Skip to content
“Death of Jehoiada and Joash's Apostasy”· 2 Chronicles 24:15–22
Translation
King James Version
And they left the house of the LORD God of their fathers, and served groves and idols: and wrath came upon Judah and Jerusalem for this their trespass.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And they left H5800 the house H1004 of the LORD H3068 God H430 of their fathers H1, and served H5647 groves H842 and idols H6091: and wrath H7110 came upon Judah H3063 and Jerusalem H3389 for this their trespass H819.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
and they abandoned the house of ADONAI the God of their ancestors and served the sacred poles and the idols. In consequence of their guilt, [God's] anger fell on Y'hudah and Yerushalayim.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
They abandoned the house of the LORD, the God of their fathers, and served the Asherah poles and idols. So wrath came upon Judah and Jerusalem for this guilt of theirs.
Ask
American Standard Version
And they forsook the house of Jehovah, the God of their fathers, and served the Asherim and the idols: and wrath came upon Judah and Jerusalem for this their guiltiness.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
They abandoned the house of the LORD, the God of their fathers, and served the Asherah poles and the idols; and wrath came on Judah and Jerusalem for this their guiltiness.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And they left the house of the Lord God of their fathers, and serued groues and idoles: and wrath came vpon Iudah and Ierusalem, because of this their trespasse.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and they forsake the house of Jehovah, God of their fathers, and serve the shrines and the idols, and there is wrath upon Judah and Jerusalem for this their guilt.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 11,696 of 31,102 · 37.6%

Study This Verse

Summary

Following the passing of the revered High Priest Jehoiada, 2 Chronicles 24:18 chronicles a tragic turning point in the reign of King Joash and the spiritual trajectory of Judah. This pivotal verse vividly depicts the nation's profound apostasy as they, swayed by ungodly counsel, deliberately abandoned the worship of the LORD God of their fathers and embraced the detestable practices of pagan idolatry, serving "groves and idols." This spiritual trespass directly provoked the manifestation of divine wrath, which justly descended upon both Judah and Jerusalem, serving as a stark and somber testament to the severe and inevitable consequences of covenant unfaithfulness and spiritual rebellion.

Context

Literary Context

This verse is strategically positioned immediately after the account of Jehoiada's death and honorable burial (2 Chronicles 24:15-16), marking a critical pivot in the narrative of King Joash's reign. During Jehoiada's lifetime, Joash "did what was right in the eyes of the LORD" (2 Chronicles 24:2), under the High Priest's faithful guidance. Jehoiada had even orchestrated the extensive repair and restoration of the temple, ensuring proper worship was re-established (2 Chronicles 24:4-14). However, with Jehoiada's restraining influence removed, the princes of Judah approached Joash, and he "listened to them" (2 Chronicles 24:17). Verse 18 then details the immediate and catastrophic consequence of this decision: the abandonment of the true worship of Yahweh and a precipitous plunge into idolatry, setting the stage for the subsequent divine judgment and the tragic, violent end of Joash's reign (2 Chronicles 24:20-25).

Historical & Cultural Context

The events of 2 Chronicles 24:18 unfold during the period of the divided monarchy, specifically within the southern kingdom of Judah. The "groves and idols" referenced are direct allusions to the pervasive Canaanite cultic practices, particularly the worship of Baal and Asherah. Asherah poles (Hebrew: asherim) were often wooden images or sacred trees, central to fertility cults that involved ritual prostitution and, at times, child sacrifice. Such practices were explicitly and vehemently forbidden by God's covenant law, as seen in passages like Deuteronomy 16:21-22. The re-engagement with these foreign deities constituted a direct violation of the first two commandments, representing a syncretistic attempt to blend the worship of Yahweh with paganism. This was a recurring temptation and sin throughout Israel's history, leading to cycles of judgment and repentance, as evidenced in the Book of Judges. This apostasy was not merely a private spiritual lapse but a public act of rebellion against God's covenant, carrying profound political and societal implications and inevitably inviting divine judgment, often manifested through military defeat, famine, or internal strife.

Key Themes

This verse powerfully illustrates several fundamental themes prevalent throughout the Books of Chronicles and the broader Old Testament narrative. Firstly, it highlights the theme of apostasy and spiritual decline, demonstrating the ease and speed with which a nation, even one recently experiencing revival, can abandon its covenant obligations and turn away from God, especially when godly leadership or influence is removed. Secondly, it underscores the pervasive danger and destructive nature of idolatry, presenting it as a direct affront to God's exclusive sovereignty and an invitation for His righteous wrath. The specific mention of "groves and idols" emphasizes the spiritual promiscuity and syncretism that continually plagued ancient Israel. Finally, the verse clearly articulates the theme of divine judgment and consequences for disobedience. God's "wrath" is not arbitrary but a just and holy response to covenant breaking and spiritual trespass, serving as a solemn warning that actions have inevitable repercussions, both for individuals and for nations, as detailed in the blessings and curses of Deuteronomy 28.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Left ʻâzab' H5800

The verb עָזַב (H5800, ʻâzab) means "to abandon, forsake, relinquish, leave." Its deployment here is profoundly significant, indicating a deliberate and complete withdrawal from the "house of the LORD God of their fathers." This is not merely a passive neglect but an active, willful turning away from the established covenant relationship and the very place consecrated for Yahweh's worship. This abandonment signifies a profound act of spiritual rebellion, a rejection of God's authority and His exclusive claim on their devotion, severing the bond that defined their national identity and prosperity.

Groves ʼăshêrâh' H842

The Hebrew word אֲשֵׁרָה (H842, ʼăshêrâh), often appearing in its plural form asherim, refers to the cultic poles or wooden images dedicated to Asherah, a prominent Canaanite goddess. Asherah was often worshipped as the consort of Baal and was central to pagan fertility cults. These objects and their associated practices were explicitly forbidden by Mosaic Law due to their connection with detestable rituals, including cultic prostitution and child sacrifice. The reintroduction of asherah worship signifies a deep plunge into syncretistic idolatry, directly challenging the singularity, holiness, and moral demands of Yahweh.

Trespass ʼashmâh' H819

The term אָשְׁמָה (H819, ʼashmâh) denotes guiltiness, a fault, or a serious offense that incurs divine displeasure and requires expiation. It implies a violation of a sacred trust or obligation, particularly against God's covenant. In this context, the "trespass" is the abandonment of the LORD and the embrace of idolatry—a profound breach of the covenant that justly provoked God's wrath. This ʼashmâh highlights the legal and moral culpability of Judah's actions, necessitating a deserved penalty as a consequence of their unfaithfulness.

Verse Breakdown

"And they left the house of the LORD God of their fathers"

This initial clause details the foundational act of apostasy. "They" refers to King Joash and the princes of Judah, who, after Jehoiada's death, were swayed by ungodly counsel. "The house of the LORD" symbolizes the very presence of God among His people, the designated center of true worship, covenant fidelity, and national identity. To "leave" it signifies a deliberate and conscious rejection of Yahweh's exclusive claim to their worship and the covenant relationship established with their ancestors. It marks a profound spiritual departure from their heritage and divine mandate.

"and served groves and idols"

This clause immediately follows, detailing the nature and consequence of their abandonment. Having forsaken the LORD, Judah actively turned to the worship of false gods. "Groves" (referring to Asherah poles/images) and "idols" represent the specific pagan deities and their associated cultic objects and practices, particularly those of the Canaanites. This was not merely a passive neglect of Yahweh but an active engagement in forbidden worship, a direct affront to God's holiness and a clear violation of the first two commandments of the Decalogue, demonstrating a complete spiritual betrayal.

"and wrath came upon Judah and Jerusalem for this their trespass"

This final clause declares the inevitable divine response to their actions. "Wrath" (Hebrew: qetseph) signifies God's righteous indignation and just judgment against their blatant disobedience and profound covenant breaking. This wrath was not abstract but manifested in tangible ways, as subsequent verses show through the invasion of the Syrian army and the subsequent defeat and humiliation of Judah (2 Chronicles 24:23-24). The phrase "for this their trespass" explicitly links the divine judgment to their specific sin of abandoning God and embracing idolatry, underscoring the principle of divine justice, accountability, and the direct consequences of covenant unfaithfulness.

Literary Devices

2 Chronicles 24:18 masterfully employs several potent literary devices to convey its profound theological message. The narrative is imbued with a striking Irony, as King Joash, who was miraculously saved and raised by the High Priest Jehoiada and initially presided over a period of significant temple restoration, ultimately succumbs to the very idolatry his predecessors often struggled with, abandoning the "house of the LORD" he once diligently repaired. The phrase "house of the LORD God of their fathers" functions as powerful Symbolism, representing not just a physical structure but the entire covenant relationship, the spiritual heritage, and the divine presence among Judah, making their departure from it all the more impactful and tragic. The swift transition from Jehoiada's death to the nation's apostasy and the immediate arrival of "wrath" highlights a dramatic Cause-and-Effect relationship, emphasizing the direct, unavoidable, and divinely ordained consequences of spiritual choices. Furthermore, the explicit mention of "groves and idols" uses Metonymy or Synecdoche to represent the entire system of pagan worship, its associated abominations, and the spiritual infidelity it embodied, rather than merely the physical objects themselves.

Theological and Thematic Connections

This verse stands as a stark and enduring reminder of the biblical principle that faithfulness to God brings blessing and life, while apostasy and idolatry inevitably lead to divine judgment and desolation. It powerfully underscores God's unwavering commitment to His covenant, which demands exclusive worship and absolute obedience from His people. The "wrath" that descended upon Judah is not an arbitrary outburst but a manifestation of God's holy character, His justice responding to a profound breach of trust and a blatant rejection of His rightful sovereignty. This recurring pattern of sin leading to judgment, and repentance potentially leading to restoration, is a pervasive theological motif throughout the Old Testament, demonstrating God's consistent moral governance over His people and the nations. The abandonment of the LORD for false gods is depicted as the ultimate betrayal, akin to severing the life-giving connection to the "fountain of living waters" and turning instead to "broken cisterns that can hold no water" (Jeremiah 2:13).

Reflection and Application

The tragic narrative of 2 Chronicles 24:18 serves as a profound and timeless warning for believers today, highlighting the insidious nature of spiritual complacency and the ever-present danger of allowing external influences to corrupt one's faith. Joash's swift and dramatic decline after the death of his godly mentor, Jehoiada, underscores the critical importance of cultivating a personal, deeply rooted relationship with God that is not solely dependent on external spiritual authority, the presence of a strong leader, or the prevailing spiritual climate of a community. It reminds us that even after periods of revival or significant spiritual growth, vigilance and intentionality are required to guard against the subtle temptations of the world, which can draw our hearts away from exclusive devotion to Christ. Our faithfulness, or lack thereof, has far-reaching ripple effects, impacting not only our own spiritual well-being but also the spiritual health and trajectory of our families, communities, and future generations. We are called to consistently examine our allegiances, identify any "groves and idols" (modern-day distractions, desires, or allegiances) that compete for God's rightful place in our hearts, and ensure that our worship remains pure, undivided, and centered on the one true God.

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what areas of my life might I be subtly "leaving the house of the LORD" or allowing "groves and idols" (e.g., career, possessions, relationships, comfort, self-reliance) to compete for my ultimate devotion and affection?
  2. How does the influence of godly mentors, leaders, or even my Christian community impact my faith, and what steps am I taking to cultivate a robust, personal walk with God that can withstand their absence or external pressures?
  3. What are the potential "trespasses" in my personal life or within my community that might invite God's displeasure, and how can I actively pursue repentance, renewed faithfulness, and a deeper commitment to His covenant?

FAQ

Why was the reintroduction of "groves and idols" so offensive to God, leading to such severe wrath?

The reintroduction of "groves and idols" was profoundly offensive to God because it represented a direct, deliberate, and egregious violation of His covenant with Israel, particularly the first two commandments. God had explicitly forbidden the worship of any other gods or the making of any graven images, demanding exclusive devotion as the one true God who had delivered them from slavery and established a unique relationship with them. The "groves" (Asherah poles/images) were symbols of pagan fertility cults, often associated with immoral practices, cultic prostitution, and even child sacrifice, all of which were an abomination to the holy God of Israel. This act of syncretism—attempting to blend the worship of Yahweh with pagan deities—was seen as spiritual adultery, a profound betrayal of the unique and exclusive relationship God had initiated with His people. God's "wrath" was not an emotional outburst but a just and righteous response to this profound rebellion and covenant unfaithfulness, demonstrating His holiness, His justice, and the absolute seriousness of sin. It was a necessary corrective to uphold His moral order and to protect the integrity of His people's relationship with Him, as warned consistently throughout the Book of Deuteronomy.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

The tragic apostasy of King Joash and Judah in 2 Chronicles 24:18, culminating in divine wrath, powerfully underscores humanity's inherent tendency to stray from God and the profound inadequacy of human kingship to secure lasting faithfulness or salvation. This narrative, like many in the Old Testament, foreshadows the ultimate need for a perfect King and High Priest who would not succumb to temptation, human counsel, or spiritual compromise, and whose righteousness would secure salvation rather than judgment. Jesus Christ is the glorious fulfillment of this deep need, the true Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, whose perfect obedience and unwavering faithfulness stand in stark contrast to Joash's trespass and Judah's apostasy. Unlike Joash, who abandoned the "house of the LORD," Christ is the very temple of God, the one through whom true worship in "spirit and truth" is made eternally possible (John 4:23-24). His atoning sacrifice on the cross bore the full weight of God's righteous wrath against sin, including the "trespass" of idolatry and apostasy, thereby offering reconciliation, forgiveness, and eternal life to all who believe (Romans 5:8-9). Through Christ, believers are empowered by the Holy Spirit to turn from all "idols"—anything that competes for God's rightful place in our hearts—and to live lives of true devotion and worship, no longer subject to the cyclical pattern of apostasy and judgment that plagued ancient Israel (1 John 5:21). He is the faithful King whose eternal reign ensures unwavering righteousness and unbroken communion with God for all who are in Him.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 2 Chronicles 24:15–27. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 13 verses
Passage under comment2 Chronicles 24:15–27
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

We have here a sad account of the degeneracy and apostasy of Joash. God had done great things for him; he had done something for God; but now he proved ungrateful to his God and false to the engagements he had laid himself under to him. How has the gold become dim, and the most fine gold changed! Here we find,

I.The occasions of his apostasy.

When he did that which was right it was not with a perfect heart. He never was sincere, never acted from principle, but in compliance to Jehoiada, who had helped him to the crown, and because he had been protected in the temple and rose upon the ruins of idolatry; and therefore, when the wind turned, he turned with it.

1.His good counsellor left him, and was by death removed from him. It was a mercy to him and his kingdom that Jehoiada lived so long-130 years (Ch2 24:15), by which it appears that he was born in Solomon's time, and had lived six entire reigns before this. It was an encouragement to him to go on in that good way which Jehoiada had trained him up in to see what honour was done to Jehoiada at his death: They buried him among the kings, with this honourable encomium (perhaps it was part of the inscription on his grave-stone), that he had done good in Israel. Judah is called Israel, because, the other tribes having revolted from God, they only were Israelites indeed. Note, It is the greatest honour to do good in our generations, and those who do that which is good shall have praise of the same. He had done good towards God; not that any man's goodness can extend unto him, but he had done good towards his house, in reviving the temple service, Ch2 23:8. Note, Those do the greatest good to their country that lay out themselves in their places to promote religion. Well, Jehoiada finished his course with honour; but the little religion that Joash had was all buried in his grave, and, after his death, both king and kingdom miserably degenerated. See how much one head may sustain, and what a great judgment to any prince or people the death of godly, zealous, useful men is. See how necessary it is that, as our Saviour speaks, we have salt in ourselves, that we act in religion from an inward principle, which will carry us on through all changes. Then the loss of a parent, a minister, a friend, will not involve the loss of our religion.

2.Bad counsellors got about him, insinuated themselves into his affections, wheedled him, flattered him, made obeisance to him, and, instead of condoling, congratulated him upon the death of his old tutor, as his release from the discipline he had been so long under, unworthy a man, a king. They tell him he must be priest-ridden no longer, he is now discharged from grave lessons and restraints, he may do as he pleases: and (would you think it?) the princes of Judah were the men that were so industrious to debauch him, Ch2 24:17. His father and grandfather were corrupted by the house of Ahab, from whom no better could be expected. But that the princes of Judah should be seducers to their king was very sad. But those that incline to the counsels of the ungodly will never want ungodly counsellors. They made obeisance to the king, flattered him into an opinion of his absolute power, promised to stand by him in making his royal will and pleasure pass for a law, any divine precept or institution to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding. And he hearkened to them: their discourse pleased him, and was more agreeable than Jehoiada's dictates used to be. Princes and inferior people have been many a time thus flattered into their ruin by those who have promised them liberty and dignity, but who have really brought them into the greatest servitude and disgrace.

II.The apostasy itself:

They left the house of God, and served groves and idols, Ch2 24:18. The princes, it is likely, had a request to the king, which they tell him they durst not offer while Jehoiada lived; but now they hope it will give no offence: it is that they may set up the groves and idols again which were thrown down in the beginning of his reign, for they hate to be always confined to the dull old-fashioned service of the temple. And he not only gave them leave to do it themselves, but he joined with them. The king and princes, who, a little while ago, were repairing the temple, now forsook the temple; those who had pulled down groves and idols now themselves served them. So inconstant a thing is man and so little confidence is to be put in him!

III.The aggravations of this apostasy and the additions of guilt to it.

God sent prophets to them (Ch2 24:19) to reprove them for their wickedness, and to tell them what would be in the end thereof, and so to bring them again unto the Lord. It is the work of ministers to bring people, not to themselves, but to God - to bring those again to him who have gone a whoring from him. In the most degenerate times God left not himself without witness; though they had dealt very disingenuously with God, yet he sent prophets to them to convince and instruct them, and to assure them that they should find favour with him if yet they would return; for he would rather sinners should turn and live than go on and die, and those that perish shall be left inexcusable. The prophets did their part: they testified against them; but, few or none received their testimony.

1.They slighted all the prophets; they would not give ear, were so strangely wedded to their idols that no reproofs, warnings, threatenings, nor any of the various methods which the prophets took to convince them would reclaim them. Few would hear them, fewer would heed them, but fewest of all would believe them or be governed by them.

2.They slew one of the most eminent, Zechariah the son of Jehoiada, and perhaps others. Concerning him observe,

(1.)The message which he delivered to them in the name of God, Ch2 24:20. The people were assembled in the court of the temple (for they had not quite left it), probably on occasion of some solemn feast, when this Zechariah, being filled with the spirit of prophecy, and known (it is likely) to be a prophet, stood up in some of the desks that were in the court of the priests, and very plainly, but without any provoking language, told the people of their sin and what would be the consequences of it. He did not impeach any particular persons, nor predict any particular judgments, as sometimes the prophets did, but as inoffensively as possible reminded them of what was written in the law. Let them but look into their Bibles, and there they would find, [1.] The precept they broke: "You transgress the commandments of the Lord, you know you do so, in serving groves and idols: and why will you so offend God and wrong yourselves?" [2.] The penalty they incurred: "You know, if the word of God be true, you cannot prosper in this evil way; never expect to do ill and fare well. Nay, you find already that because you have forsaken the Lord he hath forsaken you, as he told you he would," Deu 29:25; Deu 31:16, Deu 31:17. This is the work of ministers, by the word of God, as a lamp and a light, to expose the sin of men and expound the providences of God.

(2.)The barbarous treatment they gave him for his kindness and faithfulness in delivering this message to them, Ch2 24:21. By the conspiracy of the princes, or some of their party, and by the commandment of the king, who thought himself affronted by this fair warning, they stoned him to death immediately, not under colour of law, accusing him as a blasphemer, a traitor, or a false prophet, but in a popular tumult, in the court of the house of the Lord - as horrid a piece of wickedness as perhaps any we read of in all the history of the kings. The person was sacred - a priest, the place sacred - the court of the temple (the inner court, between the porch and the altar), the message yet more sacred, and we have reason to think that they knew it came from the spirit of prophecy. The reproof was just, the warning fair, both backed with scripture, and the delivery very gentle and tender; and yet so impudently and daringly do they defy God himself that nothing less than the blood of the prophet can satisfy their indignation at the prophecy. Be astonished, O heavens! at this, and tremble, O earth! that ever such villany should be committed by men, by Israelites, in contempt and violation of every thing that is just, honourable, and sacred - that a king, a king in covenant with God, should command the murder of one whom it was his office to protect and countenance! The Jews say there were seven transgressions in this; for they killed a priest, a prophet, a judge, they shed innocent blood, and polluted the court of the temple, the sabbath, and the day of expiation: for on that day, their tradition says, this happened.

(3.)The aggravation of this sin, that this Zechariah, who suffered martyrdom for his faithfulness to God and his country, was the son of Jehoiada, who had done so much good in Israel, and particularly had been as a father to Joash, Ch2 24:22. The affront done by it to God, and the contempt put on religion, are not so particularly taken notice of as the ingratitude there was in it to the memory of Jehoiada. He remembered not the kindness of the father, but slew the son for doing his duty, and what the father would have done if he had been there. Call a man ungrateful, and you can call him no worse.

(4.)The dying martyr's prophetic imprecation of vengeance upon his murderers: The Lord look upon it, and require it! This came not from a spirit of revenge, but a spirit of prophecy: He will require it. This would be the continual cry of the blood they shed, as Abel's blood cried against Cain: "Let the God to whom vengeance belongs demand blood for blood. He will do it, for he is righteous." This precious blood was quickly reckoned for in the judgments that came upon this apostate prince; it came into the account afterwards in the destruction of Jerusalem by the Chaldeans - their misusing the prophets was that which brought upon them ruin without remedy (Ch2 36:16); nay, our Saviour makes the persecutors of him and his gospel answerable for the blood of this Zechariah; so loud, so long, does the blood of the martyrs cry. See Mat 23:35. Such as this is the cry of the souls under the altar (Rev 6:10), How long ere thou avenge our blood? For it shall not always go unrevenged.

IV.The judgments of God which came upon Joash for this aggravated wickedness of his.

1.A small army of Syrians made themselves masters of Jerusalem, destroyed the princes, plundered the city, and sent the spoil of it to Damascus, Ch2 24:23, Ch2 24:24. God's people, while they kept in with God, had often been conquerors when the enemy had the advantage of the greater number; but now, on the contrary, an inconsiderable handful of Syrians routed a very great host of Israelites, because they had forsaken the Lord God of their fathers, and then they were not only put upon the level with their enemies, but opposed them with the utmost disadvantage; for their God not only departed from them, but turned to be their enemy and fought against them. The Syrians were employed as instruments in God's hand to execute judgments against Joash, though they little thought so, Isa 10:6, Isa 10:7, and see Deu 32:30.

2.God smote him with great diseases, of body, or mind, or both, either like his grandfather (Ch2 21:18), or, like Saul, an evil spirit from God troubling him. While he was plagued with the Syrians he thought that, if he could but get clear of them, he should do well enough. But, before they departed from him, God smote him with diseases. If vengeance pursue men, the end of one trouble will but be the beginning of another.

3.His own servants conspired against him. Perhaps he began to hope his disease would be cured - he was but a middle-aged man and might recover it; but he that cometh up out of the pit shall fall into the snare. When he thought he should escape death by sickness he met it by the sword. They slew him in his bed for the blood of the sons of Jehoiada, by which it should seem that he did not only slay Zechariah, but others of the sons of Jehoiada for his sake. Perhaps those that slew him intended to take vengeance for that blood; but, whether they did or not, this was what God intended in permitting them to slay him. Those that drink the blood of the saints shall have their own blood given them to drink, for they are worthy. The regicides are here named (Ch2 24:26), and it is observable that the mothers of them both were foreigners, one an Ammonitess and the other a Moabitess. The idolatrous kings, it is likely, countenanced those marriages which the law prohibited for the prevention of idolatry; and see how they resulted in their own destruction.

4.His people would not bury him in the sepulchres of the kings because he had stained his honour by his mal-administration. Let him not be written with the righteous, Psa 69:28. These judgments are called the burdens laid upon him (Ch2 24:27), for the wrath of God is a heavy burden, too heavy for any man to bear. Or it may be meant of the threatenings denounced against him by the prophets, for those are called burdens. Usually God sets some special marks of his displeasure upon apostates in this life, for warning to all to remember Lot's wife.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Five Centuries of Reception

3 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

3 quotes · AD 258–735
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly Medieval
300400500600700

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

AD 258CyprianAnte-NiceneSourceEpistle LIV.17
But if there are some who think that they can return to the Church not with prayers but with threats, or suppose that they can make a way for themselves, not with lamentation and atonements, but with terrors, let them take it for certain that against such the Church of the Lord stands closed; nor does the camp of Christ, unconquered and firm with the Lord's protection, yield to threats. The priest of God holding fast the Gospel and keeping Christ's precepts may be slain; he cannot be conquered. Zacharias, God's priest, suggests and furnishes to us examples of courage and faith, who, when he could not be terrified with threats and stoning, was slain in the temple of God, at the same time crying out and saying, what we also cry out and say against the heretics, "Thus saith the Lord, Ye have forsaken the ways of the Lord, and the Lord will forsake you."
AD 435John CassianPost-NiceneSourceINSTITUTES 12.21
Some such thing we read of in the book of Chronicles. For Joash the king of Judah at the age of seven was summoned by Jehoiada the priest to the kingdom and by the witness of Scripture is commended for all his actions as long as the aforesaid priest lived. But hear what Scripture relates of him after Jehoiada’s death and how he was puffed up with pride and given over to a most disgraceful state. “But after the death of Jehoiada the princes went in and worshiped the king: and he was soothed by their services and hearkened to them. And they forsook the temple of the Lord, the God of their fathers, and served groves and idols, and great wrath came on Judah and Jerusalem because of this sin.” And after a little: “When a year was come about, the army of Syria came up against him: and they came to Judah and Jerusalem and killed all the princes of the people, and they sent all the spoils to the king to Damascus. And whereas there came a very small number of the Syrians, the Lord delivered into their hands an infinite multitude, because they had forsaken the Lord the God of their fathers; and on Joash they executed shameful judgments. And departing they left him in great diseases.” You see how the consequence of pride was that he was given over to shocking and filthy passions. For he who is puffed up with pride and has permitted himself to be worshiped as God, is (as the apostle says) “given over to shameful passions and a reprobate mind to do those things that are not convenient.” And because, as Scripture says, “everyone who exalts his heart is unclean before God,” he who is puffed up with swelling pride of heart is given over to most shameful confusion to be deluded by it, that when thus humbled he may know that he is unclean through impurity of the flesh and knowledge of impure desires, a thing that he had refused to recognize in the pride of his heart; and also that the shameful infection of the flesh may disclose the hidden impurity of the heart, which he contracted through the sin of pride, and that through the patent pollution of his body he may be proved to be impure, who did not formerly see that he had become unclean through the pride of his spirit.
AD 735BedeEarly MedievalSourceHomilies on the Gospels 1.3
Zechariah was son of high priest Jehoiada, a man who was likewise very holy. They stoned Zechariah between the temple and the altar, as the Lord himself bore witness when he made mention of the blessed martyrs in the Gospel.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Chronicles 24:18 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.