मुख्य सामग्री पर जाएँ

1 Samuel 17:26

“David Arrives at the Camp”· 1 Samuel 17:12–30Read in context
King James Version
And David spake to the men that stood by him, saying, What shall be done to the man that killeth this Philistine, and taketh away the reproach from Israel? for who is this uncircumcised Philistine, that he should defy the armies of the living God?
KJV (with Strong's)
And David H1732 spake H559 to the men H582 that stood H5975 by him, saying H559, What shall be done H6213 to the man H376 that killeth H5221 this H1975 Philistine H6430, and taketh away H5493 the reproach H2781 from Israel H3478? for who is this uncircumcised H6189 Philistine H6430, that he should defy H2778 the armies H4634 of the living H2416 God H430?
Complete Jewish Bible
David said to the men standing with him, "What reward will be given to the man who kills this P'lishti and removes this disgrace from Isra'el? Who is this uncircumcised P'lishti anyway, that he challenges the armies of the living God?"
Berean Standard Bible
David asked the men who were standing with him, “What will be done for the man who kills this Philistine and removes this disgrace from Israel? Just who is this uncircumcised Philistine, that he should defy the armies of the living God?”
American Standard Version
And David spake to the men that stood by him, saying, What shall be done to the man that killeth this Philistine, and taketh away the reproach from Israel? for who is this uncircumcised Philistine, that he should defy the armies of the living God?
World English Bible Messianic
David spoke to the men who stood by him, saying, “What shall be done to the man who kills this Philistine, and takes away the reproach from Israel? For who is this uncircumcised Philistine, that he should defy the armies of the living God?”
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then Dauid spake to the men that stoode with him, and sayde, What shall be done to the man that killeth this Philistim, and taketh away the shame from Israel? for who is this vncircumcised Philistim, that he shoulde reuile the hoste of the liuing God?
Young's Literal Translation
And David speaketh unto the men who are standing by him, saying, `What is done to the man who smiteth this Philistine, and hath turned aside reproach from Israel? for who is this uncircumcised Philistine that he hath reproached the ranks of the living God?'
हिन्दी · HCV
दावीद ने बातें कर रहे उन सैनिकों से प्रश्न किया, “उस व्यक्ति को क्या प्रतिफल दिया जाएगा, जो इस फिलिस्तीनी का संहार कर इस्राएल के उस अपमान को मिटा देगा? क्योंकि यह अख़तनित फिलिस्तीनी होता कौन है, जो जीवन्त परमेश्वर की सेनाओं की ऐसी उपेक्षा करे?”
Translation

Study this verse

Summary

In 1 Samuel 17:26, David, a young shepherd, confronts the pervasive fear gripping the Israelite army and King Saul in the face of Goliath's audacious defiance. His indignant rhetorical question reveals a profound spiritual insight: Goliath's challenge is not merely against Israel but against the "armies of the living God." This pivotal moment showcases David's unwavering faith, his zealous concern for God's honor, and his clear understanding of Israel's covenant identity, setting the stage for his miraculous victory and foreshadowing his future role as Israel's king.

Context

Literary Context

This verse immediately follows David's arrival at the battlefield, bringing provisions to his brothers, and overhearing Goliath's daily taunts and the Israelite army's terrified response. The narrative has meticulously built up the seemingly insurmountable threat of Goliath, described in detail in 1 Samuel 17:4-11, and the paralyzing fear that has gripped Saul and all Israel for forty days, as noted in 1 Samuel 17:16. David's question is a sharp contrast to the prevailing despair, serving as the narrative's turning point. It highlights his unique spiritual perspective, distinguishing him from the fearful soldiers and setting him apart as the one who will act where others falter. His inquiry also directly precedes the famous confrontation, demonstrating that his motivation is rooted in righteous indignation rather than merely the promised reward mentioned in 1 Samuel 17:25.

Historical & Cultural Context

The Philistines were a formidable, technologically superior enemy of Israel, frequently clashing for control of the land. Their military prowess, including their use of iron weaponry, posed a significant threat to early Israel. The practice of single combat, as proposed by Goliath in 1 Samuel 17:8-9, was a common ancient Near Eastern custom designed to minimize casualties in large-scale battles by having champions represent their respective armies. The term "uncircumcised Philistine" carries immense cultural and theological weight. Circumcision was the physical sign of God's covenant with Abraham and his descendants, established in Genesis 17:9-14, marking Israel as God's chosen people. To be "uncircumcised" was to be outside this covenant, a pagan, and thus, in David's view, entirely unqualified to defy the God of Israel. This cultural marker underscored Goliath's spiritual, not just physical, opposition.

Key Themes

David's question in this verse is a potent expression of several overarching themes in 1 Samuel and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it underscores the theme of faith versus fear, powerfully contrasting David's bold trust in God with the widespread terror among Saul's army, evident in 1 Samuel 17:11. Secondly, it highlights the paramount importance of God's honor and glory. David's primary concern is not the physical threat or the personal reward, but the "reproach from Israel" and the defiance against "the armies of the living God." This reflects a deep understanding that the battle is ultimately God's, a truth David later articulates in 1 Samuel 17:47. Thirdly, the verse emphasizes covenant identity; David's disdain for the "uncircumcised Philistine" roots his indignation in Israel's unique relationship with Yahweh. Finally, it introduces the theme of divine sovereignty and intervention, implying that God Himself will act on behalf of His people against those who defy Him, a truth echoed throughout Israel's history, such as in Exodus 14:14 and Deuteronomy 20:4.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Reproach cherpâh' H2781

This word signifies "contumely, disgrace, the pudenda; rebuke, reproach(-fully), shame." In the context of Israel's covenant with God, "reproach" refers to the deep shame and humiliation brought upon God's people, and by extension, upon God's holy name, when they are mocked, defeated, or seemingly abandoned by pagan nations. David's fervent desire to "take away the reproach from Israel" is not merely about national pride, but about vindicating the honor and reputation of Yahweh, whose name was being slandered and blasphemed by Goliath's daily taunts.

Uncircumcised ʻârêl' H6189

This term means "properly, exposed, i.e. projecting loose (as to the prepuce); used only technically,; uncircumcised (i.e. still having the prepuce uncurtailed); uncircumcised (person)." For an Israelite, circumcision was the visible, physical sign of their covenant relationship with Yahweh, marking them as distinct and holy among the nations. David uses this term as a derogatory and theologically loaded epithet to strip Goliath of any perceived power or legitimacy. It emphasizes Goliath's status as an outsider, a pagan devoid of any covenant standing or claim to God's favor, making his defiance of the "living God" all the more outrageous and blasphemous.

Defy châraph' H2778

This primitive root means "to pull off, i.e. (by implication) to expose (as by stripping); specifically, to betroth (as if a surrender); figuratively, to carp at, i.e. defame; to spend the winter; betroth, blaspheme, defy, jeopard, rail, reproach, upbraid." In this verse, Goliath's "defiance" is an act of open contempt, a verbal assault, and an act of blasphemy against the God of Israel. It implies a stripping away of honor and a public shaming. David's indignation is ignited precisely because Goliath's taunts are not just a challenge to Israel's military, but a direct and public act of "defiance" against the "armies of the living God," an act that demands a divine response.

Verse Breakdown

"And David spake to the men that stood by him, saying"

This opening clause immediately establishes David's initiative and his position among the soldiers, not as a commander, but as a young man observing the crisis. His speaking "to the men that stood by him" indicates an informal inquiry, yet one that carries profound weight and quickly draws attention. It highlights his direct engagement with the situation, unlike the passive fear of others, and sets the stage for his bold intervention.

"What shall be done to the man that killeth this Philistine, and taketh away the reproach from Israel?"

This is a rhetorical question, not born of ignorance about the promised reward (which he likely knew, as per 1 Samuel 17:25), but as an expression of his righteous indignation and a means to gauge the seriousness of the situation among the soldiers. His primary concern is "taking away the reproach," which signifies the national and spiritual disgrace brought upon Israel by Goliath's defiance. This reveals David's motivation is not primarily personal gain, but the restoration of God's honor and Israel's dignity.

"for who [is] this uncircumcised Philistine, that he should defy the armies of the living God?"

This second rhetorical question forms the core of David's outrage. The term "uncircumcised Philistine" underscores Goliath's pagan, outsider status, making his defiance all the more egregious. The phrase "armies of the living God" elevates the Israelite army from a mere human fighting force to the earthly representation of the Almighty, active, and sovereign God. David perceives Goliath's taunts not as a challenge to men, but as a direct insult and act of rebellion against the very being of Yahweh, the God who is alive and powerful.

Literary Devices

The verse is rich in Rhetorical Questions, which David employs not to seek information but to express his deep indignation and to challenge the complacent fear of the Israelite soldiers. These questions serve to highlight the absurdity of Goliath's defiance from a faith perspective. There is a strong Contrast drawn between the "uncircumcised Philistine" and "the armies of the living God," emphasizing the spiritual chasm between paganism and covenant faith, and the impotence of human might against divine power. The narrative also uses Foreshadowing, as David's bold inquiry and spiritual insight hint at his future role as Israel's king, a man after God's own heart, who would prioritize God's glory above all else. Furthermore, there's an element of Irony, as the youngest and least experienced individual on the battlefield is the only one who truly grasps the spiritual dimension of the conflict and possesses the faith to act.

Theological and Thematic Connections

David's bold question in 1 Samuel 17:26 is a profound theological statement, asserting that the true battle is spiritual, not merely physical. His indignation stems from a deep reverence for God's holy name and His covenant with Israel. He understands that Goliath's taunts are not just a challenge to Israel's military might, but a direct affront to the "living God" whom Israel serves. This perspective elevates the conflict from a national struggle to a cosmic one, where God's honor is at stake. It teaches us that true faith sees beyond the immediate, daunting circumstances to the sovereign power and character of God, motivating us to defend His glory when it is challenged. This theological conviction is a cornerstone of biblical faith, reminding believers that our ultimate allegiance is to God and His kingdom, and that His honor should be our highest priority.

Reflection and Application

David's response to Goliath's defiance in 1 Samuel 17:26 offers a timeless model for believers facing overwhelming challenges. Instead of succumbing to fear like the rest of Israel, David's faith ignited a righteous indignation, compelling him to see the "giant" not as an insurmountable obstacle, but as an affront to the "living God." This challenges us to examine our own reactions to the "giants" in our lives—whether they be personal struggles, societal injustices, or spiritual attacks. Do we view them through the lens of human limitation and fear, or through the lens of God's limitless power and His honor? David's example calls us to prioritize God's glory above our comfort or safety, to stand firm in our identity as children of the "living God," and to trust that He is actively engaged in our battles. It encourages us to ask, "Who is this challenge that it should defy the God who is for us?" and to act in faith, knowing that the battle belongs to the Lord.

Questions for Reflection

  1. What "giants" or seemingly insurmountable challenges are you facing today, and how are you currently viewing them?
  2. How does David's concern for God's honor challenge your own motivations when confronting difficulties?
  3. In what ways might you be allowing "reproach" to remain on God's name in your sphere of influence, and what steps can you take to "take it away"?
  4. How can you cultivate a deeper awareness of God as the "living God" who actively fights for His people in your daily life?

FAQ

Was David primarily motivated by the reward offered for defeating Goliath?

While a significant reward was promised, as noted in 1 Samuel 17:25, David's primary motivation, as revealed in 1 Samuel 17:26, was not personal gain but a profound concern for the honor of God and the "reproach" brought upon Israel. His indignant question, "for who [is] this uncircumcised Philistine, that he should defy the armies of the living God?", clearly indicates that his outrage stemmed from a spiritual affront. He saw Goliath's taunts as a direct insult to God, not just a military challenge. His faith and zeal for God's name far outweighed any desire for riches or status, which were merely secondary benefits of God's vindication.

Why is Goliath being "uncircumcised" so important to David?

The term "uncircumcised" was a deeply significant theological and cultural marker for Israelites. Circumcision was the physical sign of the covenant God made with Abraham, detailed in Genesis 17:9-14, distinguishing Israel as God's chosen people from all other nations. By calling Goliath "this uncircumcised Philistine," David was not merely stating a physical fact; he was declaring Goliath's status as an outsider, a pagan, someone who had no covenant relationship with the true God. This made Goliath's defiance of Israel's God all the more egregious and blasphemous in David's eyes. It underscored that Goliath had no spiritual standing to challenge the "armies of the living God."

What does David mean by "the armies of the living God"?

When David refers to "the armies of the living God," he is articulating a profound theological truth: the Israelite army is not just a human fighting force, but the earthly representation and instrument of Yahweh, the active, powerful, and ever-present God. This stands in stark contrast to the lifeless idols worshipped by the Philistines. David's phrase emphasizes God's vitality and His direct involvement in the affairs of His people. Goliath's defiance, therefore, is not merely against Saul's soldiers, but against the Almighty God Himself, who is the true commander and champion of Israel. This perspective transforms a seemingly impossible human battle into a divinely ordained victory, as God Himself would fight for His name.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

David's righteous indignation in 1 Samuel 17:26, fueled by his zeal for the honor of the "living God" against the "uncircumcised Philistine," profoundly foreshadows the ultimate champion, Jesus Christ. Just as David stood in the gap to remove the reproach from Israel and vindicate God's name, so too did Jesus confront the ultimate "giant" of sin, death, and the devil, who had defied humanity and God's holy name. The "reproach" that hung over humanity due to sin was far greater than any national disgrace, separating us from the "living God." Jesus, the true Son of David and the perfect Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world, entered the battlefield of human existence, not with a sling and stone, but with perfect obedience and sacrificial love. He, the perfectly "circumcised" one in heart, embodying the true spiritual circumcision described in Romans 2:29, confronted the powers of darkness and, through His death and resurrection, "disarmed the rulers and authorities and put them to open shame, by triumphing over them in him," as Colossians 2:15 declares. He took away our reproach, reconciled us to the "living God," and forever vindicated God's glory, demonstrating that the battle truly belongs to the Lord, and victory over sin and death is found in Him alone, as Hebrews 2:14-15 powerfully articulates.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Samuel 17:12–30. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 19 verses
Passage under comment1 Samuel 17:12–30
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Forty days the two armies lay encamped facing one another, each advantageously posted, but neither forward to engage. Either they were parleying and treating of an accommodation or they were waiting for recruits; and perhaps there were frequent skirmishes between small detached parties. All this while, twice a day, morning and evening, did the insulting champion appear in the field and repeat his challenge, his own heart growing more and more proud for his not being answered and the people of Israel more and more timorous, while God designed hereby to ripen him for destruction and to make Israel's deliverance the more illustrious. All this while David is keeping his father's sheep, but at the end of forty days Providence brings him to the field to win and wear the laurel which no other Israelite dares venture for. We have in these verses,

I.The present state of his family.

His father was old (Sa1 17:12): He went among men for an old man, was taken notice of for his great age, above what was usual at that time, and therefore was excused from pubic services, and went not in person to the wars, but sent his sons; he had the honours paid him that were due his age, his hoary head was a crown of glory to him. David's three elder brethren, who perhaps envied his place at the court, got their father to send for him home, and let them go to the camp, where they hoped to signalize themselves and eclipse him (Sa1 17:13, Sa1 17:14), while David himself was so far from being proud of the services he had done his prince, or ambitious of further preferment, that he not only returned from court to the obscurity of his father's house, but to care, and toil, and (as it proved, Sa1 17:34) the peril, of keeping his father's sheep. It was the praise of this humility that it came after he had the honour of a courtier, and the reward of it that it came before the honour of a conqueror. Before honour is humility. Now he had that opportunity of mediation and prayer, and other acts of devotion, which fitted him for what he was destined to more than all the military exercises of that inglorious camp could do.

II.The orders his father gave him to go and visit his brethren in the camp.

He did not himself ask leave to go, to satisfy his curiosity, or to gain experience and make observations; but his father sent him on a mean and homely errand, on which any of his servants might have gone. He must carry some bread and cheese to his brethren, ten loaves with some parched corn for themselves (Sa1 17:17) and ten cheeses (which, it seems, he thought too good for them) for a present to their colonel, Sa1 17:18. David must still be the drudge of the family, though he was to be the greatest ornament of it. He had not so much as an ass at command to carry his load, but must take it on his back, and yet run to the camp. Jesse, we thought, was privy to his being anointed, and yet industriously kept him thus mean and obscure, probably to hide him from the eye of suspicion and envy, knowing that he was anointed to a crown in reversion. He must observe how his brethren fared, whether they were not reduced to short allowance, now that the encampment continued so long, that, if need were, he might send them more provisions. And he must take their pledge, that is, if they had pawned any thing, he must redeem it; take notice of their company, so some observe, whom they associate with, and what sort of life they lead. Perhaps David, like Joseph, had formerly brought to his father their evil report, and now he sends him to enquire concerning their manners. See the care the pious parents about their children when they are abroad from them, especially in places of temptation; they are solicitous how they conduct themselves, and particularly what company they keep. Let children think of this, and conduct themselves accordingly, remembering that, when they are from under their parents' eye, they are still under God's eye.

III.David's dutiful obedience to his father's command.

His prudence and care made him be up early (Sa1 17:20), and yet not to leave his sheep without a keeper, so faithful was he in a few things and therefore the fitter to be made ruler over many things, and so well had he learnt to obey before he pretended to command. God's providence brought him to the camp very seasonably, when both sides had set the battle in array, and, as it should seem, were more likely to come to an engagement than they had yet been during all the forty days, Sa1 17:21. Both sides were now preparing to fight. Jesse little thought of sending his son to the army just at that critical juncture, but the wise God orders the time and all the circumstances of actions and affairs so as to serve his designs of securing the interests of Israel and advancing the men after his own heart. Now observe here,

1.How brisk and lively David was, Sa1 17:22. What articles he brought he honestly took care of, and left them with those that had the charge of the bag and baggage; but, though he had come a long journey with a great load, he ran into the army, to see what was doing there, and to pay his respects to his brethren. Seest thou a man thus diligent in his business, he is in the way of preferment, he shall stand before kings.

2.How bold and daring the Philistine was, Sa1 17:23. Now that the armies were drawn out into a line of battle he appeared first to renew his challenge, vainly imagining that he was in the eager chase of his own glory and triumph, whereas really he was but courting his own destruction.

3.How timorous and faint-hearted the men of Israel were. Though they had, for forty days together, been used to his haughty looks and threatening language, and, having seen no execution done by either, might have learned to despise both, yet, upon his approach, they fled from him and were greatly afraid, Sa1 17:24. One Philistine could never thus have chased 1000 Israelites, and put 10,000 to flight, unless their Rock, being treacherously forsaken by them, had justly sold them, and shut them up, Deu 32:30.

4.How high Saul bid for a champion. Though he was the tallest of all the men of Israel, and, if he had not been so, while he kept close to God might himself have safely taken up the gauntlet which this insolent Philistine threw down, yet, the Spirit of the Lord having departed from him, he durst not do it, nor press Jonathan to do it; but whoever will do it shall have as good preferment as he can give him, Sa1 17:25. If the hope of wealth and honour will prevail with any man to expose himself so far, it is proclaimed that the bold adventurer, if he come off, shall marry the king's daughter and have a good portion with her; but, as it should seem, whether he come off or no, his father's house shall be free in Israel, from all toll, tribute, custom, and services to the crown, or shall be ennobled and advanced to the peerage.

5.How much concerned David was to assert the honour of God and Israel against the impudent challenges of this champion. He asked what reward was promised to him that should slay this Philistine (Sa1 17:26), though he knew already, not because he was ambitious of the honour, but because he would have it taken notice of, and reported to Saul, how much he resented the indignity hereby done to Israel and Israel's God. He might have presumed so far upon his acquaintance and interest at court as to go himself to Saul to offer his service; but his modesty would not let him do this. It was one of his own rules, before it was one of his son's proverbs, Put not forth thyself in the presence of the king, and stand not in the place of great men (Pro 25:6); yet his zeal put him upon that method which he hoped would bring him into this great engagement. Two considerations, it seems, fired David with a holy indignation: - (1.) That the challenger was one that was uncircumcised, a stranger to God and out of covenant with him. (2.) That the challenged were the armies of the living God, devoted to him, employed by him and for him, so that the affronts offered to them reflected upon the living God himself, and that he could not bear. When therefore some had told him what was the reward proposed for killing the Philistine (Sa1 17:27) he asked others (Sa1 17:30), with the same resentment, which he expected would at length come to Saul's ear.

6.How he was brow-beaten and discouraged by his eldest brother Eliab, who, taking notice of his forwardness, fell into a passion upon it, and gave David very abusive language, Sa1 17:28. Consider this,

(1.)As the fruit of Eliab's jealousy. He was the eldest brother, and David the youngest, and perhaps it had been customary with him (as it is with too many elder brothers) to trample upon him and take every occasion to chide him. But those who thus exalt themselves over their juniors may perhaps live to see themselves, by a righteous providence, abased, and those to whom they are abusive exalted. Time may come when the elder may serve the younger. But Eliab was now vexed that his younger brother should speak those bold words against the Philistine which he himself durst not say. He knew what honour David had already had in the court, and, if he should now get honour in the camp (from which he thought he had found means effectually to seclude him, Sa1 17:15), the glory of his elder brethren would be eclipsed and stained; and therefore (such is the nature of jealousy) he would rather that Goliath should triumph over Israel than that David should be the man that should triumph over him. Wrath is cruel and anger is outrageous, but who can stand before envy, especially the envy of a brother, the keenness of which Jacob, and Joseph, and David experienced? See Pro 18:19. It is very ill-favoured language that Eliab here gives him; not only unjust and unkind, but, at this time, basely ungrateful; for David was now sent by his father, as Joseph by his, on a kind of visit to his brethren. Eliab intended, in what he said, not only to grieve and discourage David himself, and quench that noble fire which he perceived glowing in his breast, but to represent him to those about him as an idle proud lad, not fit to be taken notice of. He gives them to understand that his business was only to keep sheep, and falsely insinuates that he was a careless unfaithful shepherd; though he had left his charge in good hands (Sa1 17:20), yet he must tauntingly be asked, With whom hast thou left those few sheep? Though he came down now to the camp in disobedience to his father and kindness to his brethren, and Eliab knew this, yet his coming is turned to his reproach: "Thou hast come down, not to do any service, but to gratify thy own curiosity, and only to look about thee;" and thence he will infer the pride and naughtiness of his heart, and pretends to know it as certainly as if he were in his bosom. David could appeal to God concerning his humility and sincerity (Psa 17:3; Psa 131:1) and at this time gave proofs of both, and yet could not escape this hard character from his own brother. See the folly, absurdity, and wickedness, of a proud and envious passion; how groundless its jealousies are, how unjust its censures, how unfair its representations, how bitter its invectives, and how indecent its language. God, by his grace, keep us from such a spirit!

(2.)As a trial of David's meekness, patience and constancy. A short trial it was, and he approved himself well in it; for,

[1.]He bore the provocation with admirable temper (Sa1 17:29): "What have I now done? What fault have I committed, for which I should thus be chidden? Is there not a cause for my coming to the camp, when my father sent me? Is there not a cause for my resenting the injury done to Israel's honour by Goliath's challenges?" He had right and reason on his side, and knew it, and therefore did not render railing for railing, but with a soft answer turned away his brother's wrath. This conquest of his own passion was in some respects more honourable than his conquest of Goliath. He that hath rule over his own spirit is better than the mighty. It was no time for David to quarrel with his brother when the Philistines were upon them. The more threatening the church's enemies are the more forbearing her friends should be with one another.

[2.]He broke through the discouragement with admirable resolution. He would not be driven off from his thoughts of engaging the Philistine by the ill-will of his brother. Those that undertake great and public services must not think it strange if they be discountenanced and opposed by those from whom they had reason to expect support and assistance; but must humbly go on with their work, in the face not only of their enemies' threats, but of their friends' slights and suspicions.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Historical Reception

2 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

2 quotes · AD 407–542
Post-Nicene
400500

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

AD 407John ChrysostomPost-NiceneSourceHOMILIES ON GENESIS 46.9-10
If you don’t mind, however, let us refer to a theme in our preaching earlier, so that by bringing the whole story to mind we may learn that nothing is stronger than the person protected by help from on high, and nothing is more vulnerable than the person deprived of this help, surrounded though he may be with countless armies. So this man David, quite young though he was and living in his father’s house on account of his immaturity, heard the call of destiny for his virtue to become conspicuous; he was urged by his father to observe his brothers; he obeyed and was sent off to them. So, after coming on the scene to observe them, he saw the battle line drawn against the foreigner Goliath and the whole people of Saul’s company withdrawing in fright and the king himself placed in particular danger. For a while he was happy to be an onlooker and went to see the strange and unusual sight of one person pitted against so many thousands. But his brothers could not tolerate the manliness of his bearing; they were moved to hatred and said to him, “Have you come for no other reason than to see the war.” You haven’t really come to observe us.Notice, however, his good sense and great restraint. Instead of saying anything rash to them, anything harsh, he extinguished the flame of their hatred; he mollified their hatred by saying, “Isn’t it only a word?” I mean, surely you haven’t observed me taking position in the ranks? I simply wanted to watch and find out the source of this man’s extraordinary frenzy. “After all, who is this foreigner who reproaches the ranks of the living God?” Then, on hearing the man’s awful arrogance and the unspeakable cowardice of those who had gone with Saul, he said, “What will be given to the man who cuts off his head?” He showed great boldness of spirit through these words and caused amazement in every one. Realizing this, Saul sent for the young man, who had experience of nothing other than shepherding, and when he saw his age he made fun of him. Then he learned from him how he dealt with bears when they raided his flocks; you see, this remarkable young man was obliged to describe this, not out of a wish to blow his own trumpet but because he had no choice if the king was to be inspired with courage and to have regard not for the poor impression he gave but for the faith concealed within him and the assistance from on high that made the young man stronger than the grown-ups, the unarmed stronger than the armed men, the shepherd than the soldiers.
AD 542Caesarius of ArlesPost-NiceneSourceSERMON 121.3
Now when David came, one of his brothers rebuked him, saying, “Why did you leave those few sheep and come to the battle?” This elder brother, maliciously chiding David who typified our Lord, signified the Jewish people who jealously slandered Christ the Lord even though he had come for the salvation of the human race, for they frequently chastised him with many insults. “Why did you leave the sheep and come to the battle?” Does it not seem to you as though through his lips the devil is speaking in envy of the salvation of humankind? It is as though he said to Christ: “Why did you leave the ninety-nine sheep who had strayed and come looking for the one which was lost, in order that you might call him back to your sheepfold, after freeing him with the staff of the cross from the hand of the spiritual Goliath, that is, from the power of the devil?” “Why did you leave those few sheep?” He spoke the truth, although in a wicked and haughty spirit. Jesus intended to leave the ninety-nine sheep, as was already said, in order to seek the one and to bring it back to his sheepfold, that is, to the company of the angels.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Samuel 17:26 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8