Skip to content
“Jesus Cleanses the Temple”· John 2:13–22
Translation
King James Version
And his disciples remembered that it was written, The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And G1161 his G846 disciples G3101 remembered G3415 that G3754 it was G2076 written G1125, The zeal G2205 of thine G4675 house G3624 hath eaten G2719 me G3165 up G2719.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
(His talmidim later recalled that the Tanakh says, “Zeal for your house will devour me.” )
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
His disciples remembered that it is written: “Zeal for Your house will consume Me.”
Ask
American Standard Version
His disciples remembered that it was written, Zeal for thy house shall eat me up.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
His disciples remembered that it was written, “Zeal for your house will eat me up.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And his disciples remembred, that it was written, The zeale of thine house hath eaten me vp.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And his disciples remembered that it is written, `The zeal of Thy house did eat me up;'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All John Sites (Jerusalem)
All John Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
Jesus' First Journey from Galilee to Jerusalem
Jesus' First Journey from Galilee to Jerusalem View full PDF
John 2:13-24
John 2:13-24 View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 26,113 of 31,102 · 84.0%

Study This Verse

Summary

Following Jesus' dramatic and authoritative cleansing of the Temple, where He overturned tables and drove out merchants, His disciples recalled a specific Old Testament prophecy. This remembrance underscored the profound significance of Jesus' actions, revealing them not as random outbursts but as a direct fulfillment of Scripture, particularly Psalm 69:9. The verse highlights Jesus' intense, consuming passion and righteous indignation for the sanctity and honor of God's dwelling place, a zeal so profound it metaphorically "ate Him up."

Context

Literary Context

This verse immediately follows Jesus' first public act of cleansing the Temple, described in John 2:13-16. Having observed Jesus' forceful expulsion of merchants and money-changers, an act demonstrating remarkable authority and righteous anger, the disciples sought to understand the deeper meaning of these events. Their recollection of the prophecy from Psalm 69:9 serves as an interpretive key, providing divine validation for Jesus' actions and hinting at His messianic identity. It is a moment of dawning comprehension for the disciples, connecting Jesus' present actions to the ancient prophetic word, thereby framing His ministry within God's redemptive plan.

Historical & Cultural Context

The setting is the Jewish Passover festival in Jerusalem, a time when the Temple courts would have been bustling with pilgrims, sacrifices, and, unfortunately, extensive commercial activity. The outer court, known as the Court of the Gentiles, had become a marketplace for selling sacrificial animals and exchanging foreign currency for Temple currency, often at exorbitant rates. While these services were deemed necessary for pilgrims, their commercialization had arguably overshadowed the Temple's primary purpose as a "house of prayer for all nations" (Isaiah 56:7). Jesus' actions challenged the established religious and economic systems, directly confronting the corruption that had infiltrated the sacred space. The disciples' remembrance of Psalm 69 would have resonated deeply within a Jewish context that anticipated a zealous Messiah who would purify Israel and restore true worship.

Key Themes

This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within the Gospel of John and broader biblical theology. Firstly, it underscores Divine Authority, demonstrating Jesus' unique prerogative to act decisively in matters concerning God's house, far surpassing the authority of any mere prophet or rabbi. Secondly, it highlights the theme of Messianic Fulfillment, as the disciples recognize Jesus' actions as a direct echo of prophetic scripture, solidifying His identity as the long-awaited Messiah who would bring purification and judgment. Thirdly, the concept of Zeal for God's House is paramount, illustrating Jesus' intense, consuming passion for the purity and honor of His Father's dwelling place, contrasting sharply with the defilement He witnessed. This zeal is not merely anger, but a righteous fervor for the glory of God, a theme that resonates throughout the Old Testament concerning God's jealousy for His own name and worship (e.g., Exodus 34:14). Finally, it touches upon the Nature of True Worship, implicitly critiquing superficial or commercialized religion and calling for a return to sincere devotion and reverence for God.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

remembered mnáomai' G3415

This verb signifies more than a casual recall; it implies a deliberate act of bringing something to mind, often with a sense of understanding or recognition. Here, the disciples' remembrance of the prophecy is an act of spiritual insight, connecting Jesus' actions to God's pre-ordained plan.

zeal zēlos' G2205

Properly, "heat," this word denotes intense fervor, passion, or ardor. In this context, it is a positive, consuming passion for righteousness and the honor of God. It is a fervent, jealous devotion that tolerates no dishonor or defilement of what belongs to God.

eaten up katesthíō' G2719

This verb literally means "to eat down" or "devour." Used metaphorically here, it powerfully conveys the overwhelming and consuming nature of Jesus' zeal. His passion for God's house was so intense that it felt as if it were consuming His very being, driving Him to act decisively and without reservation.

Verse Breakdown

"And his disciples remembered"

This clause emphasizes the disciples' growing comprehension. Witnessing Jesus' extraordinary actions in the Temple, their minds were drawn back to the sacred texts they knew. This remembrance is not accidental but divinely orchestrated, allowing them to perceive the prophetic significance of the moment.

"that it was written"

This phrase directly points to the authority of Scripture. The disciples recognized Jesus' actions as a direct fulfillment of what had been foretold, affirming the divine origin and purpose behind His ministry. It grounds Jesus' behavior not in human impulse but in God's eternal plan.

"The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up."

This is a direct quotation from Psalm 69:9. It reveals the inner motivation of Jesus' Temple cleansing. His "zeal" for the purity and honor of God's dwelling place was so profound and consuming that it metaphorically devoured Him, compelling Him to act with righteous indignation against its desecration. This intense passion was not for personal gain but for the glory of His Father.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several significant literary devices. Foremost is Quotation/Allusion, as the disciples' remembrance directly cites Psalm 69:9, a passage widely understood as messianic. This direct quotation serves to validate Jesus' actions as divinely ordained and to highlight His identity as the promised Messiah. The phrase "hath eaten me up" functions as a powerful Metaphor, vividly conveying the overwhelming and consuming nature of Jesus' passion. It is not literal consumption but a figurative expression of total absorption and dedication. Furthermore, the Temple itself functions as Symbolism, representing not just a physical structure but the very presence and honor of God among His people. Jesus' zeal for this "house" symbolizes His ultimate concern for the integrity of God's worship and the purity of His relationship with humanity.

Theological and Thematic Connections

John 2:17 profoundly connects Jesus' identity and mission to the Old Testament's prophetic witness, particularly concerning the Messiah's role in purifying Israel and restoring true worship. Jesus' zeal mirrors God's own holy jealousy for His name and His dwelling place, demonstrating that Jesus acts with divine authority and purpose. This incident foreshadows His ultimate work of cleansing, not just a physical temple, but the hearts of humanity, establishing a new spiritual temple built on His sacrifice. The disciples' remembrance of Psalm 69:9 provides a crucial interpretive lens, affirming that Jesus' actions were not random but part of God's unfolding redemptive plan, revealing Him as the one consumed by devotion to His Father's glory.

Reflection and Application

Jesus' consuming zeal for His Father's house in John 2:17 serves as a powerful call to examine our own passion and devotion to God. If Jesus, the Son of God, was so consumed by the purity and honor of a physical temple, how much more should we, as His followers, be zealous for the spiritual temple, which is the church and our own bodies (1 Corinthians 6:19-20)? This verse challenges us to consider whether our worship is genuine, whether our lives reflect God's holiness, and whether we tolerate anything that dishonors His name within our communities or ourselves. It invites us to cultivate a fervent, active love for God's presence and purposes, allowing His desires to shape our priorities and actions, purging complacency and compromise in favor of passionate devotion.

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what areas of my life, or within my church community, might there be "tables to overturn" or "merchants to drive out" that hinder true worship and devotion to God?
  2. How does my personal "zeal" for God compare to the consuming passion Jesus demonstrated? Am I truly "eaten up" by a desire for His glory?
  3. What practical steps can I take to cultivate a deeper reverence for God's presence, both in my personal life and in corporate worship?

FAQ

Why was it important for the disciples to remember this specific Old Testament prophecy?

The disciples' remembrance of Psalm 69:9 was crucial for several reasons. Firstly, it provided a divine interpretive framework for Jesus' otherwise shocking actions. Without this prophetic context, His cleansing of the Temple might have appeared as an uncontrolled outburst or a rebellious act. Secondly, it affirmed Jesus' messianic identity. Psalm 69 is widely regarded as a messianic psalm, foretelling the suffering and zeal of the coming deliverer. By recognizing this fulfillment, the disciples began to grasp the true nature of Jesus' mission and authority. Lastly, it underscored the continuity between the Old Testament prophecies and their New Testament fulfillment, demonstrating that Jesus' life and ministry were not random but part of God's predetermined plan of redemption.

How does Jesus' zeal for the Temple relate to His broader mission?

Jesus' zeal for the Temple in John 2:17 is a microcosm of His entire mission. It demonstrates His unwavering commitment to His Father's honor and His righteous opposition to anything that defiles God's holy name or corrupts true worship. This act of cleansing foreshadows His ultimate mission to cleanse humanity from sin through His atoning sacrifice on the cross. Just as He sought to restore the physical Temple to its intended purpose, He came to restore humanity's relationship with God, making us living temples of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 3:16). His zeal for the Temple was not an isolated incident but an expression of His profound love for God and His passion for the redemption and purification of His people.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

John 2:17, with its reference to Jesus' consuming zeal for His Father's house, finds its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment not merely in Jesus' purification of a physical building, but in His very person and redemptive work. Jesus Himself is the true Temple, the dwelling place of God among humanity (John 1:14). His zeal, which "ate Him up," foreshadows His total devotion unto death for the glory of God and the salvation of humanity. The defilement of the Temple, which provoked His righteous anger, points to the deeper defilement of sin in the human heart, which only He could cleanse. His subsequent declaration that He would rebuild "this temple" in three days (John 2:19-21) explicitly connects His death and resurrection to the establishment of a new, spiritual temple—His body, the church. Through His perfect sacrifice, Jesus inaugurated a new covenant where access to God is no longer limited to a physical structure but is found in Him, the ultimate High Priest (Hebrews 4:14-16) who perfectly embodies divine zeal and cleanses us to become living stones in God's spiritual house (1 Peter 2:5).

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers John 2:12–22. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 11 verses
Passage under commentJohn 2:12–22
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Here we have,

I.The short visit Christ made to Capernaum, Joh 2:12.

It was a large and populous city, about a day's journey from Cana; it is called his own city (Mat 9:1), because he made it his head-quarters in Galilee, and what little rest he had was there. It was a place of concourse, and therefore Christ chose it, that the fame of his doctrine and miracles might thence spread the further. Observe,

1.The company that attended him thither: his mother, his brethren, and his disciples. Wherever Christ went,

(1.)He would not go alone, but would take those with him who had put themselves under his guidance, that he might instruct them, and that they might attest his miracles.

(2.)He could not go alone, but they would follow him, because they liked the sweetness either of his doctrine or of his wine, Joh 6:26. His mother, though he had lately given her to understand that in the works of his ministry he should pay no more respect to her than to any other person, yet followed him; not to intercede with him, but to learn of him. His brethren also and relations, who were at the marriage and were wrought upon by the miracle there, and his disciples, who attended him wherever he went. It should seem, people were more affected with Christ's miracles at first than they were afterwards, when custom made them seem less strange.

2.His continuance there, which was at this time not many days, designing now only to begin the acquaintance he would afterwards improve there. Christ was still upon the remove, would not confine his usefulness to one place, because many needed him. And he would teach his followers to look upon themselves but as sojourners in this world, and his ministers to follow their opportunities, and go where their work led them. We do not now find Christ in the synagogues, but he privately instructed his friends, and thus entered upon his work by degrees. It is good for young ministers to accustom themselves to pious and edifying discourse in private, that they may with the better preparation, and greater awe, approach their public work. He did not stay long at Capernaum, because the passover was at hand, and he must attend it at Jerusalem; for every thing is beautiful in its season. The less good must give way to the greater, and all the dwellings of Jacob must give place to the gates of Zion.

II.The passover he kept at Jerusalem; it is the first after his baptism, and the evangelist takes notice of all the passovers he kept henceforward, which were four in all, the fourth that at which he suffered (three years after this), and half a year was now past since his baptism. Christ, being made under the law, observed the passover at Jerusalem; see Exo 23:17. Thus he taught us by his example a strict observance of divine institutions, and a diligent attendance on religious assemblies. He went up to Jerusalem when the passover was at hand, that he might be there with the first. It is called the Jews' passover, because it was peculiar to them (Christ is our Passover); now shortly God will no longer own it for his. Christ kept the passover at Jerusalem yearly, ever since he was twelve years old, in obedience to the law; but now that he has entered upon his public ministry we may expect something more from him than before; and two things we are here told he did there: -

1.He purged the temple, Joh 2:14-17. Observe here,

(1.)The first place we find him in at Jerusalem was the temple, and, it should seem, he did not make any public appearance till he came thither; for his presence and preaching there were that glory of the latter house which was to exceed the glory of the former, Hag 2:9. It was foretold (Mal 3:1): I will send my messenger, John Baptist; he never preached in the temple, but the Lord, whom ye seek, he shall suddenly come to his temple, suddenly after the appearing of John Baptist; so that this was the time, and the temple the place, when, and where, the Messiah was to be expected.

(2.)The first work we find him at in the temple was the purging of it; for so it was foretold there (Mal 3:2, Mal 3:3): He shall sit as a refiner and purify the sons of Levi. Now was come the time of reformation. Christ came to be the great reformer; and, according to the method of the reforming kings of Judah, he first purged out what was amiss (and that used to be passover-work too, as in Hezekiah's time, Ch2 30:14, Ch2 30:15, and Josiah's, Kg2 23:4, etc.), and then taught them to do well. First purge out the old leaven, and then keep the feast. Christ's design in coming into the world was to reform the world; and he expects that all who come to him should reform their hearts and lives, Gen 35:2. And this he has taught us by purging the temple. See here,

[1.]What were the corruptions that were to be purged out. He found a market in one of the courts of the temple, that which was called the court of the Gentiles, within the mountain of that house. There, First, They sold oxen, and sheep, and doves, for sacrifice; we will suppose, not for common use, but for the convenience of those who came out of the country, and could not bring their sacrifices in kind along with them; see Deu 14:24-26. This market perhaps had been kept by the pool of Bethesda (Joh 5:2), but was admitted into the temple by the chief priests, for filthy lucre; for, no doubt, the rents for standing there, and fees for searching the beasts sold there, and certifying that they were without blemish, would be a considerable revenue to them. Great corruptions in the church owe their rise to the love of money, Ti1 6:5, Ti1 6:10. Secondly, They changed money, for the convenience of those that were to pay a half-shekel in specie every year, by way of poll, for the service of the tabernacle (Exo 30:12), and no doubt they got by it.

[2.]What course our Lord took to purge out those corruptions. He had seen these in the temple formerly, when he was in a private station; but never went about to drive them out till now, when he had taken upon him the public character of a prophet. He did not complain to the chief priests, for he knew they countenanced those corruptions. But he himself,

First, Drove out the sheep and oxen, and those that sold them, out of the temple. He never used force to drive any into the temple, but only to drive those out that profaned it. He did not seize the sheep and oxen for himself, did not distrain and impound them, though he found them damage faissant - actual trespassers upon his Father's ground; he only drove them out, and their owners with them. He made a scourge of small cords, which probably they had led their sheep and oxen with, and thrown them away upon the ground, whence Christ gathered them. Sinners prepare the scourges with which they themselves will be driven out from the temple of the Lord. He did not make a scourge to chastise the offenders (his punishments are of another nature), but only to drive out the cattle; he aimed no further than at reformation. See Rom 13:3, Rom 13:4; Co2 10:8.

Secondly, He poured out the changers' money, to kerma - the small money - the Nummorum Famulus. In pouring out the money, he showed his contempt of it; he threw it to the ground, to the earth as it was. In overthrowing the tables, he showed his displeasure against those that make religion a matter of worldly gain. Money-changers in the temple are the scandal of it. Note, In reformation, it is good to make thorough work; he drove them all out; and not only threw out the money, but, in overturning the tables, threw out the trade too.

Thirdly, He said to them that sold doves (sacrifices for the poor), Take these things hence. The doves, though they took up less room, and were a less nuisance than the oxen and sheep, yet must not be allowed there. The sparrows and swallows were welcome, that were left to God's providence (Psa 84:3), but not the doves, that were appropriated to man's profit. God's temple must not be made a pigeon-house. But see Christ's prudence in his zeal. When he drove out the sheep and oxen, the owners might follow them; when he poured out the money, they might gather it up again; but, if he had turned the doves flying, perhaps they could not have been retrieved; therefore to them that sold doves he said, Take these things hence. Note, Discretion must always guide and govern our zeal, that we do nothing unbecoming ourselves, or mischievous to others.

Fourthly, He gave them a good reason for what he did: Make not my Father's house a house of merchandise. Reason for conviction should accompany force for correction.

a.Here is a reason why they should not profane the temple, because it was the house of God, and not to be made a house of merchandise. Merchandise is a good thing in the exchange, but not in the temple. This was, (a.) to alienate that which was dedicated to the honour of God; it was sacrilege; it was robbing God. (b.) It was to debase that which was solemn and awful, and to make it mean. (c.) It was to disturb and distract those services in which men ought to be most solemn, serious, and intent. It was particularly an affront to the sons of the stranger in their worship to be forced to herd themselves with the sheep and oxen, and to be distracted in their worship by the noise of a market, for this market was kept in the court of the Gentiles. (d.) It was to make the business of religion subservient to a secular interest; for the holiness of the place must advance the market, and promote the sale of their commodities. Those make God's house a house of merchandise, [a.] Whose minds are filled with cares about worldly business when they are attending on religious exercises, as those, Amo 8:5; Eze 33:31. [b.] Who perform divine offices for filthy lucre, and sell the gifts of the Holy Ghost, Act 8:18.

b.Here is a reason why he was concerned to purge it, because it was his Father's house. And, (a.) Therefore he had authority to purge it, for he was faithful, as a Son over his own house. Heb 3:5, Heb 3:6. In calling God his Father, he intimates that he was the Messiah, of whom it was said, He shall build a house for my name, and I will be his Father, Sa2 7:13, Sa2 7:14. (b.) Therefore he had a zeal for the purging of it: "It is my Father's house, and therefore I cannot bear to see it profaned, and him dishonoured." Note, If God be our Father in heaven, and it be therefore our desire that his name may be sanctified, it cannot but be our grief to see it polluted. Christ's purging the temple thus may justly be reckoned among his wonderful works. Inter omnia signa quae fecit Dominus, hoc mihi videtur esse mirabilius - Of all Christ's wonderful works this appears to me the most wonderful. - Hieron. Considering, [a.] That he did it without the assistance of any of his friends; probably it had been no hard matter to have raised the mob, who had a great veneration for the temple, against these profaners of it; but Christ never countenanced any thing that was tumultuous or disorderly. There was one to uphold, but his own arm did it. [b.] That he did it without the resistance of any of his enemies, either the market-people themselves, or the chief priests that gave them their licences, and had the posse templi - temple force, at their command. But the corruption was too plain to be justified; sinners' own consciences are reformers' best friends; yet that was not all, there was a divine power put forth herein, a power over the spirits of men; and in this non-resistance of theirs that scripture was fulfilled (Mal 3:2, Mal 3:3), Who shall stand when he appeareth?

Fifthly, Here is the remark which his disciples made upon it (Joh 2:17): They remembered that it was written, The Zeal of thine house hath eaten me up. They were somewhat surprised at first to see him to whom they were directed as the Lamb of God in such a heat, and him whom they believed to be the King of Israel take so little state upon him as to do this himself; but one scripture came to their thoughts, which taught them to reconcile this action both with the meekness of the Lamb of God and with the majesty of the King of Israel; for David, speaking of the Messiah, takes notice of his zeal for God's house, as so great that it even ate him up, it made him forget himself, Psa 69:9. Observe, 1. The disciples came to understand the meaning of what Christ did, by remembering the scriptures: They remembered now that it was written. Note, The word of God and the works of God do mutually explain and illustrate each other. Dark scriptures are expounded by their accomplishment in providence, and difficult providences are made easy by comparing them with the scriptures. See of what great use it is to the disciples of Christ to be ready and mighty in the scriptures, and to have their memories well stored with scripture truths, by which they will be furnished for every good work, 2. The scripture they remembered was very apposite: The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up. David was in this a type of Christ that he was zealous for God's house, Psa 132:2, Psa 132:3. What he did for it was with all his might; see Ch1 29:2. The latter part of that verse (Psa 69:9) is applied to Christ (Rom 15:3), as the former part of it here. All the graces that were to be found among the Old Testament saints were eminently in Christ, and particularly this of zeal for the house of God, and in them, as they were patterns to us, so they were types of him. Observe, (1.) Jesus Christ was zealously affected to the house of God, his church: he loved it, and was always jealous for its honour and welfare. (2.) This zeal did even eat him up; it made him humble himself, and spend himself, and expose himself. My zeal has consumed me, Psa 119:139. Zeal for the house of God forbids us to consult our own credit, ease, and safety, when they come in competition with our duty and Christ's service, and sometimes carries on our souls in our duty so far and so fast that our bodies cannot keep pace with them, and makes us as deaf as our Master was to those who suggested, Spare thyself. The grievances here redressed might seem but small, and such as should have been connived at; but such was Christ's zeal that he could not bear even those that sold and bought in the temple. Si ibi ebrios inveniret quid faceret Dominus! (saith St. Austin.) If he had found drunkards in the temple, how much more would he have been displeased!

2.Christ, having thus purged the temple, gave a sign to those who demanded it to prove his authority for so doing. Observe here,

(1.)Their demand of a sign: Then answered the Jews, that is the multitude of the people, with their leaders. Being Jews, they should rather have stood by him, and assisted him to vindicate the honour of their temple; but, instead of this, they objected against it. note, Those who apply themselves in good earnest to the work of reformation must expect to meet with opposition. When they could object nothing against the thing itself, they questioned his authority to do it: "What sign showest thou unto us, to prove thyself authorized and commissioned to do these things?" It was indeed a good work to purge the temple; but what had he to do to undertake it, who was in no office there? They looked upon it as an act of jurisdiction, and that he must prove himself a prophet, yea, more than a prophet. But was not the thing itself sign enough? His ability to drive so many from their posts, without opposition, was a proof of his authority; he that was armed with such a divine power was surely armed with a divine commission. What ailed these buyers and sellers, that they fled, that they were driven back? Surely it was at the presence of the Lord (Psa 114:5, Psa 114:7), no less a presence.

(2.)Christ's answer to this demand, Joh 2:19. He did not immediately work a miracle to convince them, but gave them a sign in something to come, the truth of which must appear by the event, according to Deu 18:21, Deu 18:22.

Now, [1.] The sign that he gives them is his own death and resurrection. He refers them to that which would be, First, His last sign. If they would not be convinced by what they saw and heard, let them wait. Secondly, The great sign to prove him to be the Messiah; for concerning him it was foretold that he should be bruised (Isa 53:5), cut off (Dan 9:26), and yet that he should not see corruption, Psa 16:10. These things were fulfilled in the blessed Jesus, and therefore truly he was the Son of God, and had authority in the temple, his Father's house.

[2.]He foretels his death and resurrection, not in plain terms, as he often did to his disciples, but in figurative expressions; as afterwards, when he gave this for a sign, he called it the sign of the prophet Jonas, so here, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. Thus he spoke in parables to those who were willingly ignorant, that they might not perceive, Mat 13:13, Mat 13:14. Those that will not see shall not see. Nay, this figurative speech used here proved such a stumbling-block to them that it was produced in evidence against him at his trial to prove him a blasphemer. Mat 26:60, Mat 26:61. Had they humbly asked him the meaning of what he said, he would have told them, and it had been a savour of life unto life to them, but they were resolved to cavil, and it proved a savour of death unto death. They that would not be convinced were hardened, and the manner of expressing this prediction occasioned the accomplishment of the prediction itself. First, He foretels his death by the Jews' malice, in these words, Destroy you this temple; that is, "You will destroy it, I know you will. I will permit you to destroy it." Note, Christ, even at the beginning of his ministry, had a clear foresight of all his sufferings at the end of it, and yet went on cheerfully in it. It is good, at setting out, to expect the worst. Secondly, He foretels his resurrection by his own power: In three days I will raise it up. There were others that were raised, but Christ raised himself, resumed his own life.

[3.]He chose to express this by destroying and re-edifying the temple, First, Because he was now to justify himself in purging the temple, which they had profaned; as if he had said, "You that defile one temple will destroy another; and I will prove my authority to purge what you have defiled by raising what you will destroy." The profaning of the temple is the destroying of it, and its reformation its resurrection. Secondly, Because the death of Christ was indeed the destruction of the Jewish temple, the procuring cause of it; and his resurrection was the raising up of another temple, the gospel church, Zac 6:12. The ruins of their place and nation (Joh 11:48) were the riches of the world. See Amo 9:11; Act 15:16.

(3.)Their cavil at this answer: "Forty and six years was this temple in building, Joh 2:20. Temple work was always slow work, and canst thou make such quick work of it?" Now here,

[1.]They show some knowledge; they could tell how long the temple was in building. Dr. Lightfoot computes that it was just forty-six years from the founding of Zerubbabel's temple, in the second year of Cyrus, to the complete settlement of the temple service, in the 32nd year of Artaxerxes; and the same from Herod's beginning to build this temple, in the 18th year of his reign, to this very time, when the Jews said that this as just forty-six years: ōkodomēthē - hath this temple been built.

[2.]They show more ignorance, First, Of the meaning of Christ's words. Note, Men often run into gross mistakes by understanding that literally which the scripture speaks figuratively. What abundance of mischief has been done by interpreting, This is my body, after a corporal and carnal manner! Secondly, Of the almighty power of Christ, as if he could do no more than another man. Had they known that this was he who built all things in six days they would not have made it such an absurdity that he should build a temple in three days.

(4.)A vindication of Christ's answer from their cavil. The difficulty is soon solved by explaining the terms: He spoke of the temple of his body, Joh 2:21. Though Christ had discovered a great respect for the temple, in purging it, yet he will have us know that the holiness of it, which he was so jealous for, was but typical, and leads us to the consideration of another temple of which that was but a shadow, the substance being Christ, Heb 9:9; Col 2:17. Some think that when he said, Destroy this temple, he pointed to his own body, or laid his hand upon it; however, it is certain that he spoke of the temple of his body. Note, The body of Christ is the true temple, of which that at Jerusalem was a type.

[1.]Like the temple, it was built by immediate divine direction: "A body hast thou prepared me," Ch1 28:19.

[2.]Like the temple, it was a holy house; it is called that holy thing.

[3.]It was, like the temple, the habitation of God's glory; there the eternal Word dwelt, the true shechinah. He is Emmanuel - God with us.

[4.]The temple was the place and medium of intercourse between God and Israel: there God revealed himself to them; there they presented themselves and their services to him. Thus by Christ God speaks to us, and we speak to him. Worshippers looked towards that house, Kg1 8:30, Kg1 8:35. So we must worship God with an eye to Christ.

(5.)A reflection which the disciples made upon this, long after, inserted here, to illustrate the story (Joh 2:22): When he was risen from the dead, some years after, his disciples remembered that he had said this. We found them, Joh 2:17, remembering what had been written before of him, and here we find them remembering what they had heard from him. Note, The memories of Christ's disciples should be like the treasure of the good house-holder, furnished with things both new and old, Mat 13:52. Now observe,

[1.]When they remembered that saying: When he was risen from the dead. It seems, they did not at this time fully understand Christ's meaning, for they were as yet but babes in knowledge; but they laid up the saying in their hearts, and afterwards it became both intelligible and useful. Note, It is good to hear for the time to come, Isa 42:23. The juniors in years and profession should treasure up those truths of which at present they do not well understand either the meaning or the use, for they will be serviceable to them hereafter, when they come to greater proficiency. It was said of the scholars of Pythagoras that his precepts seemed to freeze in them till they were forty years old, and then they began to thaw; so this saying of Christ revived in the memories of his disciples when he was risen from the dead; and why the? First, Because then the Spirit was poured out to bring things to their remembrance which Christ had said to them, and to make them both easy and ready to them, Joh 14:26. That very day that Christ rose form the dead he opened their understandings, Luk 24:45. Secondly, Because then this saying of Christ was fulfilled. When the temple of his body had been destroyed and was raised again, and that upon the third day, then they remembered this among other words which Christ had said to this purport. Note, It contributes much to the understanding of the scripture to observe the fulfilling of the scripture. The event will expound the prophecy.

[2.]What use they made of it: They believed the scripture, and the word that Jesus had said; their belief of these was confirmed and received fresh support and vigour. They were slow of heart to believe (Luk 24:25), but they were sure. The scripture and the word of Christ are here put together. not because they concur and exactly agree together, but because they mutually illustrate and strengthen each other. When the disciples saw both what they had read in the Old Testament, and what they had heard from Christ's own mouth, fulfilled in his death and resurrection, they were the more confirmed in their belief of both.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Four Centuries of Reception

8 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

8 quotes · AD 407–804
Post-NiceneEarly Medieval
400500600700800

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

Another Evangelist writes, that as He cast them out, He said, Make not my Father's house "a den of thieves," but this one, "(Make not My Father's house) an house of merchandise."

They do not in this contradict each other, but show that he did this a second time, and that both these expressions were not used on the same occasion, but that He acted thus once at the beginning of His ministry, and again when He had come to the very time of His Passion. Therefore, (on the latter occasion,) employing more strong expressions, He spoke of it as (being made) "a den of thieves," but here at the commencement of His miracles He does not so, but uses a more gentle rebuke; from which it is probable that this took place a second time.

"And wherefore," says one, "did Christ do this same, and use such severity against these men, a thing which He is nowhere else seen to do, even when insulted and reviled, and called by them 'Samaritan' and 'demoniac'? for He was not even satisfied with words only, but took a scourge, and so cast them out." Yes, but it was when others were receiving benefit, that the Jews accused and raged against Him; when it was probable that they would have been made savage by His rebukes, they showed no such disposition towards Him, for they neither accused nor reviled Him.
AD 407John Chrysostomas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Hom. xxiii. in Joan. c. 2) Lo, He speaks of God as His Father, and they are not angry, for they think He means it in a common sense. But afterwards when He spoke more openly, and showed that He meant equality, they were enraged. In Matthew's account too, (c. 21) on driving them out, He says, Ye have made it (My Father's house) a den of thieves. (21:13.) This was just before His Passion, and therefore He uses severer language. But the former being at the beginning of His miracles, His answer is milder and more indulgent.

(Hom. xxiii. 2) But why did Christ use such violence? He was about to heal on the Sabbath day, and to do many things which appeared to them transgressions of the Law. That He might not appear therefore to be acting contrary to God, He did this at His own peril; and thus gave them to understand, that He who exposed Himself to such peril to defend the decency of the house, did not despise the Lord of that house. For the same reason, to show His agreement with God, He said not, the Holy house, but, My Father's house. It follows, And His disciples remembered what was written; The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up.
Since he was about to heal on the Sabbath day, and to do many such things which were thought by them transgressions of the Law, in order that He might not seem to do this as though He had come to be some rival God and opponent of His Father, He takes occasion hence to correct any such suspicion of theirs. For One who had exhibited so much zeal for the House was not likely to oppose Him who was Lord of the House, and who was worshiped in it. No doubt even the former years during which He lived according to the Law, were sufficient to show His reverence for the Legislator, and that He came not to give contrary laws; yet since it was likely that those years were forgotten through lapse of time, as not having been known to all because He was brought up in a poor and mean dwelling, He afterwards does this in the presence of all, (for many were present because the feast was nigh at hand,) and at great risk. For he did not merely "cast them out," but also "overturned the tables," and "poured out the money," giving them by this to understand, that He who threw Himself into danger for the good order of the House could never despise his Master. Had He acted as He did from hypocrisy, He should only have advised them; but to place Himself in danger was very daring. For it was no light thing to offer Himself to the anger of so many market-folk, to excite against Himself a most brutal mob of petty dealers by His reproaches and His blows, this was not the action of a pretender, but of one choosing to suffer everything for the order of the House.

And therefore not by His actions only, but by His words, He shows his agreement with the Father; for He saith not "the Holy House," but "My Father's House." See, He even calls Him, "Father," and they are not wroth; they thought He spoke in a general way: but when He went on and spoke more plainly, so as to set before them the idea of His Equality, then they become angry.
"They," His disciples, it says, "Remembered that it is written, The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up."

But the Jews did not remember the Prophecy, and said, "What sign showest Thou unto us?" both grieving that their shameful traffic was cut off, and expecting by these means to stop Him, and also desiring to challenge Him to a miracle, and to find fault with what He was doing.
"Then the disciples remembered that it was written, The zeal of Thine house hath eaten me up:" because by this zeal of God's house, the Lord cast these men out of the temple. Brethren, let every Christian among the members of Christ be eaten up with zeal of God's house. Who is eaten up with zeal of God's house? He who exerts himself to have all that he may happen to see wrong there corrected, desires it to be mended, does not rest idle: who if he cannot mend it, endures it, laments it. The grain is not shaken out on the threshing-floor that it may enter the barn when the chaff shall have been separated. If thou art a grain, be not shaken out from the floor before the putting into the granary; lest thou be picked up by the birds before thou be gathered into the granary. For the birds of heaven, the powers of the air, are waiting to snatch up something off the threshing-floor, and they can snatch up only what has been shaken out of it. Therefore, let the zeal of God's house eat thee up: let the zeal of God's house eat up every Christian, zeal of that house of God of which he is a member. For thy own house is not more important than that wherein thou hast everlasting rest. Thou goest into thine own house for temporal rest, thou enterest God's house for everlasting rest. If, then, thou busiest thyself to see that nothing wrong be done in thine own house, is it fit that thou suffer, so far as thou canst help, if thou shouldst chance to see aught wrong in the house of God, where salvation is set before thee, and rest without end? For example, seest thou a brother rushing to the theatre? Stop him, warn him, make him sorry, if the zeal of God's house doth eat thee up. Seest thou others running and desiring to get drunk, and that, too, in holy places, which is not decent to be done in any place? Stop those whom thou canst, restrain whom thou canst, frighten whom thou canst, allure gently whom thou canst: do not, however, rest silent. Is it a friend? Let him be admonished gently. Is it a wife? Let her be bridled with the utmost rigor. Is it a maid-servant? Let her be curbed even with blows. Do whatever thou canst for the part thou bearest; and so thou fulfillest, "The zeal of Thy house hath eaten me up." But if thou wilt be cold, languid, having regard only to thyself, and as if thyself were enough to thee, and saying in thy heart, What have I to do with looking after other men's sins? Enough for me is the care of my own soul: this let me keep undefiled for God;-come, does there not recur to thy mind the case of that servant who hid his talent and would not lay it out? Was he accused because he lost it, and not because he kept it without profit? So hear ye then, my brethren, that ye may not rest idle. I am about to give you counsel: may He who is within give it; for though it be through me, it is He that gives it. You know what to do, each one of you, in his own house, with his friend, his tenant, his client, with greater, with less: as God grants an entrance, as He opens a door for His word, do not cease to win for Christ; because you were won by Christ.
AD 735Bedeas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Early MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(in loc.) His disciples seeing this most fervent zeal in Him, remembered that it was from zeal for His Father's house that our Saviour drove the ungodly from the temple.
AD 804Alcuin of Yorkas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Early MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
Zeal, taken in a good sense, is a certain fervour of the Spirit, by which the mind, all human fears forgotten, is stirred up to the defence of the truth.

To take the passage mystically, God enters His Church spiritually every day, and marks each one's behaviour there. Let us be careful then, when we are in God's Church, that we indulge not in stories, or jokes, or hatreds, or lusts, lest on a sudden He come and scourge us, and drive us out of His Church.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying John 2:17 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.