TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Numbers 11:4–15. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
These verses represent things sadly unhinged and out of order in Israel, both the people and the prince uneasy.
I.Here is the people fretting, and speaking against God himself (as it is interpreted, Psa 78:19), notwithstanding his glorious appearances both to them and for them. Observe,
1.Who were the criminals.
(1.)The mixed multitude began, they fell a lusting, Num 11:4. The rabble that came with them out of Egypt, expecting only the land of promise, but not a state of probation in the way to it. They were hangers on, who took hold of the skirts of the Jews, and would go with them only because they knew not how to live at home, and were disposed to seek their fortunes (as we say) abroad. These were the scabbed sheep that infected the flock, the leaven that leavened the whole lump. Note, A few factious, discontented, ill-natured people, may do a great deal of mischief in the best societies, if great care be not taken to discountenance them. Such as these are an untoward generation, from which it is our wisdom to save ourselves, Act 2:40.
(2.)Even the children of Israel took the infection, as we are informed, Num 11:4. The holy seed joined themselves to the people of these abominations. The mixed multitude here spoken of were not numbered with the children of Israel, but were set aside as a people God made no account of; and yet the children of Israel, forgetting their own character and distinction, herded themselves with them and learned their way, as if the scum and outcasts of the camp were to be the privy-counsellors of it. The children of Israel, a people near to God and highly privileged, yet drawn into rebellion against him! O how little honour has God in the world, when even the people which he formed for himself, to show forth his praise, were so much a dishonour to him! Therefore let none think that their external professions and privileges will be their security either against Satan's temptations to sin or God's judgments for sin. See Co1 10:1, Co1 10:2, Co1 10:12.
2.What was the crime: they lusted and murmured. Though they had been lately corrected for this sin, and many of them overthrown for it, as God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah, and the smell of the fire was still in their nostrils, yet they returned to it. See Pro 27:22.
(1.)They magnified the plenty and dainties they had had in Egypt (Num 11:5), as if God had done them a great deal of wrong in taking them thence. While they were in Egypt they sighed by reason of their burdens, for their lives were made bitter to them with hard bondage; and yet now they talk of Egypt as if they had all lived like princes there, when this serves as a colour for their present discontent. But with what face can they talk of eating fish in Egypt freely, or for nought, as if it cost them nothing, when they paid so dearly for it with their hard service? They remember the cucumbers, and the melons, and the leeks, and the onions, and the garlick (precious stuff indeed to be fond of!), but they do not remember the brick-kilns and the task-masters, the voice of the oppressor and the smart of the whip. No, these are forgotten by these ungrateful people.
(2.)They were sick of the good provision God had made for them, Num 11:6. It was bread from heaven, angels' food. To show how unreasonable their complaint was, it is here described, Num 11:7-9. It was good for food, and pleasant to the eye, every grain like an orient pearl; it was wholesome food and nourishing; it was not to be called dry bread, for it tasted like fresh oil; it was agreeable (the Jews say, Wisd. 16:20) to every man's palate, and tasted as he would have it; and, though it was still the same, yet, by the different ways of dressing it, it yielded them a grateful variety; it cost them no money, nor care, for it fell in the night, while they slept; and the labour of gathering it was not worth speaking of; they lived upon free quarter, and yet could talk of Egypt's cheapness and the fish they ate there freely. Nay, which was much more valuable than all this, the manna came from the immediate power and bounty of God, not from common providence, but from special favour. It was, as God's compassion, new every morning, always fresh, not as their food who live on shipboard. While they lived on manna, they seemed to be exempted from the curse which sin has brought on man, that in the sweat of his face should he eat bread. And yet they speak of manna with such scorn, as if it were not good enough to be meat for swine: Our soul is dried away. They speak as if God dealt hardly with them in allowing them no better food. At first they admired it (Exo 16:15): What is this? "What a curious precious thing is this!" But now they despised it. Note, Peevish discontented minds will find fault with that which has no fault in it but that it is too good for them. It is very provoking to God to undervalue his favours, and to put a but upon our common mercies. Nothing but manna! Those that might be very happy often make themselves very miserable by their discontents.
(3.)They could not be satisfied unless they had flesh to eat. They brought flocks and herds with them in great abundance out of Egypt; but either they were covetous, and could not find in their hearts to kill them, lest they should lessen their flocks (they must have flesh as cheap as they had bread, or they would not be pleased), or else they were curious, beef and mutton would not please them; they must have something more nice and delicate, like the fish they did eat in Egypt. Food would not serve; they must be feasted. They had feasted with God upon the peace-offerings which they had their share of; but it seems God did not keep a table good enough for them, they must have daintier bits than any that came to his altar. Note, It is an evidence of the dominion of the carnal mind when we are solicitous to have all the delights and satisfactions of sense wound up to the height of pleasurableness. Be not desirous of dainties, Pro 23:1-3. If God gives us food convenient, we ought to be thankful, though we do not eat the fat and drink the sweet.
(4.)They distrusted the power and goodness of God as insufficient for their supply: Who will give us flesh to eat? taking it for granted that God could not. Thus this question is commented upon, Psa 78:19, Psa 78:20, Can he provide flesh also? though he had given them flesh with their bread once, when he saw fit (Exo 16:13), and they might have expected that he would do it again, and in mercy, if, instead of murmuring, they had prayed. Note, It is an offence to God to let our desires go beyond our faith.
(5.)They were eager and importunate in their desires; they lusted a lust, so the word is, lusted greatly and greedily, till they wept again for vexation. So childish were the children of Israel, and so humoursome, that they cried because they had not what they would have and when they would have it. They did not offer up this desire to God, but would rather be beholden to any one else than to him. We should not indulge ourselves in any desire which we cannot in faith turn into prayer, as we cannot when we ask meat for our lust, Psa 78:18. For this sin the anger of the Lord was kindled greatly against them, which is written for our admonition, that we should not lust after evil things as they lusted, Co1 10:6.
(6.)Flesh is good food, and may lawfully be eaten; yet they are said to lust after evil things. What is lawful of itself becomes evil to us when it is what God does not allot to us and yet we eagerly desire it.
II.Moses himself, though so meek and good a man, is uneasy upon this occasion: Moses also was displeased. Now,
1.It must be confessed that the provocation was very great. These murmurings of theirs reflected great dishonour upon God, and Moses laid to heart the reproaches cast on himself; they knew that he did his utmost for their good, and that he neither did nor could do any thing without a divine appointment; and yet to be thus continually teased and clamoured against by an unreasonable ungrateful people would break in upon the temper even of Moses himself. God considered this, and therefore we do not find that he chided him for his uneasiness.
2.Yet Moses expressed himself otherwise than became him upon this provocation, and came short of his duty both to God and Israel in these expostulations.
(1.)He undervalues the honour God had put upon him, in making him the illustrious minister of his power and grace, in the deliverance and guidance of that peculiar people, which might have been sufficient to balance the burden.
(2.)He complains too much of a sensible grievance, and lays too near his heart a little noise and fatigue. If he could not bear the toil of government, which was but running with the footman, how would he bear the terrors of war, which was contending with horses? He might easily have furnished himself with considerations enough to enable him to slight their clamours, and make nothing of them.
(3.)He magnifies his own performances, that all the burden of the people lay upon him; whereas God himself did in effect ease him of all the burden. Moses needed not to be in care to provide quarters for them, or victuals; God did all. And, if any difficult case happened, he needed not to be in any perplexity, while he had the oracle to consult, and in it the divine wisdom to direct him, the divine authority to back him and bear him out, and almighty power itself to dispense rewards and punishments.
(4.)He is not so sensible as he ought to be of the obligation he lay under, by virtue of the divine commission and command, to do the utmost he could for his people, when he suggests that because they were not the children of his body therefore he was not concerned to take a fatherly care of them, though God himself, who might employ him as he pleased, had appointed him to be a father to them.
(5.)He takes too much to himself when he asks, Whence should I have flesh to give them (Num 11:13), as if he were the housekeeper, and not God. Moses gave them not the bread, Joh 6:32. Nor was it expected that he should give them the flesh, but as an instrument in God's hand; and if he meant, "Whence should God have it for them?" he too much limited the power of the Holy One of Israel.
(6.)He speaks distrustfully of the divine grace when he despairs of being able to bear all this people, Num 11:14. Had the work been much less, he could not have gone through it in his own strength; but had it been much greater, through God strengthening him, he might have done it.
(7.)It was worst of all passionately to wish for death, and desire to be killed out of hand, because just at this time his life was made a little uneasy to him, Num 11:15. Is this Moses? Is this the meekest of all the men on the earth? The best have their infirmities, and fail sometimes in the exercise of that grace for which they are most eminent. But God graciously overlooked Moses's passion at this time, and therefore we must not be severe in our animadversions upon it, but pray, Lord, lead us not into temptation.
Continue studying Numbers 11:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Numbers 11:11 encapsulates a profoundly raw and human moment of despair from Moses, the divinely appointed leader of Israel. Overwhelmed by the incessant grumbling and demands of the Israelite people in the wilderness, Moses pours out his heart to the LORD, questioning why God has seemingly afflicted him and why he has not found favor, to the extent that the crushing burden of leading such a rebellious nation has been laid solely upon him. This lament powerfully illustrates the immense pressure of spiritual leadership and the profound vulnerability even of God's most faithful servants.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is situated within a critical turning point in the book of Numbers, immediately following a fresh wave of Israelite complaining. Chapters 10 and 11 detail the Israelites' departure from Mount Sinai, where they had received the Law and established the covenant. Almost immediately, their journey is marked by discontent. First, the people complain about hardship, leading to a consuming fire from the LORD, as described in Numbers 11:1-3. This is quickly followed by the "rabble" (mixed multitude) among them, and then the Israelites themselves, expressing a strong craving for meat, lamenting the consistent provision of manna and recalling the varied diet they enjoyed in Egypt, as detailed in Numbers 11:4-6. This persistent, ungrateful grumbling, coupled with the sheer logistical and spiritual weight of leading such a vast and rebellious multitude, pushes Moses to his breaking point, eliciting this direct and desperate cry to God. The events immediately following this lament include God's promise to provide meat (quail) and His instruction to Moses to gather seventy elders to share the burden of leadership, as recorded in Numbers 11:16-17.
Historical & Cultural Context
The setting is the harsh and unpredictable wilderness, a desolate environment that amplified the people's dependence on divine provision and their propensity for complaint. The Israelites were a massive population, numbering potentially in the millions, making the task of leading, feeding, watering, and governing them an unparalleled logistical and pastoral challenge. Moses, as the sole intermediary between God and His people, bore the unique and immense responsibility for their spiritual well-being, their physical sustenance, and their adherence to the covenant. In the ancient Near East, leaders were often seen as divinely appointed, but the scale of Moses' task and the character of the people he led were exceptional. The cultural expectation was that a leader would provide for his people, and Moses, despite God's miraculous provision, felt personally accountable for their constant dissatisfaction and spiritual backsliding, a burden that few leaders in history have ever had to carry.
Key Themes
Numbers 11:11 contributes significantly to several overarching themes within the book of Numbers and the Pentateuch. It powerfully illustrates The Burden of Leadership, showing the crushing weight and profound isolation that can accompany divine calling, especially when leading a rebellious and ungrateful people. Moses' lament underscores the theme of Human Vulnerability and Lament, revealing that even the most divinely appointed and steadfast leaders are susceptible to despair and are permitted to express their deepest frustrations honestly to God. This moment highlights the tension between God's faithfulness and Israel's persistent unfaithfulness, a recurring motif throughout the wilderness narrative. Furthermore, Moses' plea sets the stage for God's compassionate response, demonstrating God's Patience and Provision not only for the people's physical needs but also for His struggling servant, as seen in the subsequent appointment of the seventy elders to share the leadership load, detailed in Numbers 11:16-17. This episode also subtly reinforces the theme of Divine Sovereignty and Human Responsibility, as Moses grapples with the task God has given him, ultimately seeking divine intervention for a burden he feels he cannot bear alone.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This verb, from the root H7489, properly means "to spoil (literally, by breaking to pieces)," and figuratively, "to make (or be) good for nothing, i.e., bad (physically, socially or morally)." Here, Moses uses it in a deeply personal and almost accusatory sense, perceiving God's actions (or perceived inaction in alleviating his burden) as causing him profound distress and hardship. It's not necessarily an accusation of God's moral evil, but rather an expression of his intense suffering and a questioning of why God has allowed such a grievous situation to befall His servant, the one He called.
This noun, H2580, denotes "graciousness, i.e., subjective (kindness, favor) or objective (beauty)." Moses' question, "wherefore have I not found favour in thy sight," expresses a profound sense of abandonment or a perceived loss of God's special, benevolent regard. He feels as though the divine grace that once empowered and sustained him in his leadership has somehow been withdrawn, leaving him to bear an unbearable weight alone. It's a poignant plea for the restoration of that special, enabling relationship with God.
This word, H4853, literally means "a burden; specifically, tribute, or (abstractly) porterage." It can refer to a physical weight, but also to a heavy responsibility, an oracle, or a prophetic utterance (something "carried" by a prophet). In this context, it vividly portrays the crushing, oppressive nature of the responsibility Moses feels for the entire nation. It's a weight that is both physical (the logistics of leadership) and spiritual (the people's rebellion and unfaithfulness), an overwhelming load that threatens to crush him.
Verse Breakdown
"And Moses said unto the LORD"
This opening establishes the direct, personal, and profoundly intimate nature of the communication. Moses, the one who spoke "face to face" with God, now pours out his heart in raw honesty, addressing the divine source of his calling and his current affliction. This is not a casual complaint but a desperate cry to the sovereign God.
"Wherefore hast thou afflicted thy servant?"
This is a rhetorical question born of deep anguish and perplexity. Moses is not seeking a theological explanation as much as he is expressing his pain and questioning the perceived injustice of his situation. He feels distressed and burdened, and he attributes this state directly to God's allowance or orchestration of circumstances, highlighting his feeling of being overwhelmed by the divine assignment.
"and wherefore have I not found favour in thy sight"
This parallels the first question, intensifying the lament. It suggests a feeling of being overlooked, abandoned, or no longer held in God's special regard. Moses feels isolated and unsupported, questioning why the divine grace that sustained him through previous trials seems absent now, leaving him vulnerable and struggling.
"that thou layest the burden of all this people upon me?"
This clause reveals the core of Moses' complaint. The "burden of all this people" refers to the immense, overwhelming responsibility for their physical needs, their spiritual state, their constant grumbling, and their rebellious hearts. He feels this entire, crushing weight has been placed solely on his shoulders by God, leading to his profound despair and sense of being utterly alone in this impossible task.
Literary Devices
Numbers 11:11 is a powerful expression of lament, a common biblical genre. Moses employs Rhetorical Question with his repeated "wherefore" (Hebrew, lamah'), not necessarily seeking a direct answer but rather expressing profound anguish, perplexity, and a sense of injustice. These questions underscore his deep emotional distress and his struggle to reconcile God's character with his current suffering. The verse also utilizes Hyperbole when Moses refers to "all this people," emphasizing the immense scale of his responsibility and the overwhelming nature of the task, a slight exaggeration born of his despair, yet powerfully conveying his internal state. Furthermore, the phrase "layest the burden" functions as a potent Metaphor, portraying the emotional, spiritual, and logistical weight of leadership as a heavy, physical load that is crushing him. This vivid imagery effectively conveys the oppressive reality of his situation.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Moses' raw lament in Numbers 11:11 offers profound theological insights into the nature of divine calling, human weakness, and God's compassionate response. It reminds us that even the most faithful and divinely appointed leaders are not immune to the crushing weight of responsibility, despair, and a sense of being overwhelmed. Moses' honest outpouring to God, rather than a sign of weakness, is an act of profound faith, demonstrating his continued reliance on the LORD as the ultimate source of his calling and his only hope for relief. God does not rebuke Moses for his complaint but responds by providing a solution: the appointment of seventy elders to share the burden, illustrating God's understanding of human limitations and His provision of community and shared responsibility in leadership. This episode underscores that God's grace is sufficient not only for the task but also for the one performing it, even when they reach their breaking point.
Reflection and Application
Moses' lament in Numbers 11:11 serves as a powerful and enduring model for all believers, especially those in leadership roles. It grants us permission to be utterly honest with God about our struggles, our frustrations, and our deepest despair, knowing that He is compassionate and understands our human limitations. We are not expected to maintain a façade of unwavering strength, but rather to bring our authentic selves, our burdens, and our questions directly to the One who called us. This passage reminds us that leadership, whether in the church, family, or community, is inherently burdensome and often isolating. It calls us to cultivate empathy for those who lead, to pray for them, and to actively support them, recognizing the immense pressures they face. Ultimately, Moses' experience teaches us that God, in His wisdom and grace, often provides relief not through supernatural removal of the burden, but through the provision of community, shared responsibility, and the empowering presence of His Spirit, enabling us to carry what we could not alone.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did Moses feel "afflicted" by God, rather than by the people?
Moses perceived his suffering and overwhelming burden as ultimately coming from God because it was God who had called him to this impossible task and placed him in this position of singular responsibility. While the immediate cause of his distress was the people's grumbling, Moses directed his lament to the LORD, questioning God's wisdom or purpose in allowing such an overwhelming situation to persist and in not providing him with sufficient "favor" or relief. It's not an accusation of God being evil, but a cry of perplexity and pain directed at the ultimate orchestrator of his life and calling. He felt God had "laid" this burden upon him, implying divine agency in his affliction and a longing for God's intervention, as seen in the subsequent events of Numbers 11.
Did God rebuke Moses for his complaint and despair?
No, God did not rebuke Moses for his honest and desperate complaint. Instead, God responded with compassion and a practical solution. He instructed Moses to gather seventy elders from among the people, upon whom He would put some of the Spirit that was on Moses, enabling them to share the burden of leadership, as detailed in Numbers 11:16-17. This demonstrates God's understanding of human limitations, His willingness to provide support for His servants, and His grace in equipping leaders rather than crushing them under impossible loads. God validated Moses' feelings by providing a tangible response to his plea for help, showing His compassionate care for His servant.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Moses' profound lament in Numbers 11:11, though born of human weakness, powerfully foreshadows the ultimate burden-bearer, Jesus Christ. Moses, as the mediator of the Old Covenant and the shepherd of a rebellious people, experienced the crushing weight of their sin and unfaithfulness. Yet, his burden was ultimately shared and alleviated by God's provision of elders. In stark contrast, Jesus bore the ultimate burden of humanity's sin and rebellion alone. He was the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, carrying a weight infinitely greater than Moses could ever conceive. While Moses cried out in anguish, Jesus too experienced profound human despair and agony in Gethsemane, sweating drops of blood as He contemplated the cup of suffering, as recorded in Luke 22:44. Yet, unlike Moses who sought relief from his burden, Jesus willingly embraced the cross, fully submitting to the Father's will, knowing it was the only way to accomplish salvation. Where Moses felt a loss of "favor," Jesus always did what pleased the Father (John 8:29), even in His suffering. He is the Good Shepherd who lays down His life for the sheep (John 10:11), and He now invites all who are weary and burdened to come to Him, promising rest for their souls (Matthew 11:28-30). Jesus, the ultimate leader, bore the burden of our sin so that we might find eternal favor and rest in Him.