דלג לתוכן

1 Samuel 18:21

“Saul Sets a Trap with Marriage”· 1 Samuel 18:17–30Read in context
King James Version
And Saul said, I will give him her, that she may be a snare to him, and that the hand of the Philistines may be against him. Wherefore Saul said to David, Thou shalt this day be my son in law in the one of the twain.
KJV (with Strong's)
And Saul H7586 said H559, I will give H5414 him her, that she may be a snare H4170 to him, and that the hand H3027 of the Philistines H6430 may be against him. Wherefore Saul H7586 said H559 to David H1732, Thou shalt this day H3117 be my son in law H2859 in the one of the twain H8147.
Complete Jewish Bible
Sha'ul said, "I'll give her to him, so that she can entrap him, and the P'lishtim can do away with him." So Sha'ul said to David, "Today you will become my son-in-law through the second [daughter]."
Berean Standard Bible
“I will give her to David,” Saul thought, “so that she may be a snare to him, and the hand of the Philistines may be against him.” So Saul said to David, “For a second time now you can be my son-in-law.”
American Standard Version
And Saul said, I will give him her, that she may be a snare to him, and that the hand of the Philistines may be against him. Wherefore Saul said to David, Thou shalt this day be my son-in-law a second time.
World English Bible Messianic
Saul said, I will give her to him, that she may be a snare to him, and that the hand of the Philistines may be against him. Therefore Saul said to David, “You shall this day be my son-in-law a second time.”
Geneva Bible (1599)
Therefore Saul said, I wil giue him her, that she may be a snare to him, and that the hand of the Philistims may bee against him. Wherefore Saul sayde to Dauid, Thou shalt this day be my sonne in law in the one of the twayne.
Young's Literal Translation
and Saul saith, `I give her to him, and she is to him for a snare, and the hand of the Philistines is on him;' and Saul saith unto David, `By the second--thou dost become my son-in-law to-day.'
עברית · Modern
ויאמר שאול אתננה לו ותהי לו למוקש ותהי בו יד פלשתים ויאמר שאול אל דוד בשתים תתחתן בי היום׃
Translation

Study this verse

Summary

1 Samuel 18:21 starkly reveals the depths of King Saul's moral decay and escalating paranoia, exposing his malevolent intent behind offering his daughter Michal in marriage to David. Far from a genuine gesture of royal favor or alliance, Saul orchestrates this union as a calculated "snare," cunningly designed for David to fall by the hand of the Philistines, thereby eliminating his popular rival without direct culpability. This pivotal verse underscores the insidious nature of unchecked jealousy and fear, demonstrating how they corrupt a leader's heart and lead to desperate, manipulative actions.

Context

Literary Context

This verse is a critical turning point in the unfolding drama between King Saul and David, immediately following David's meteoric rise to national prominence after his miraculous victory over Goliath. Saul's initial admiration for David quickly curdled into intense jealousy and paranoia, manifesting in repeated, increasingly desperate attempts on David's life, including hurling a spear at him 1 Samuel 18:11. Earlier in this chapter, Saul had offered his elder daughter Merab to David as a reward for his military prowess, a promise he later shamefully reneged on, giving her instead to Adriel the Meholathite 1 Samuel 18:17-19. When it became known that Saul's younger daughter, Michal, harbored genuine affection for David 1 Samuel 18:20, Saul seized this development as a renewed, more cunning opportunity to ensnare David. This verse marks Saul's third distinct, and arguably most deceptive, attempt to eliminate David, setting the stage for the perilous and morally repugnant conditions of the bride-price he would subsequently demand.

Historical & Cultural Context

In the ancient Near East, royal marriages were rarely solely matters of personal affection; they were primarily political instruments. Kings strategically offered their daughters to valiant warriors, influential tribal leaders, or foreign potentates to forge alliances, consolidate power, ensure loyalty, and secure dynastic succession. Saul's public offer of Michal to David, therefore, would have appeared, on the surface, to be a standard royal gesture of honor, integrating a successful warrior into the royal family. However, the underlying motive was deeply sinister. The Philistines were Israel's perennial and formidable enemies, constantly threatening their borders and national security. Saul's insidious plan to use the Philistines as the instrument of David's death was a particularly cruel and cowardly tactic. It allowed him to leverage a national threat for personal, murderous gain, all while maintaining a deceptive facade of legitimacy and avoiding direct culpability in the eyes of his people.

Key Themes

This verse powerfully illustrates several overarching themes prevalent throughout the book of 1 Samuel. Firstly, it vividly portrays Saul's escalating jealousy and paranoia, demonstrating how unchecked envy and insecurity can utterly corrupt a leader, leading to desperate, immoral, and self-destructive actions. His willingness to exploit his own daughter as bait in a murderous scheme underscores the profound depth of his moral decay and his obsessive determination to maintain power, even at the cost of his integrity and familial bonds. Secondly, the theme of deception and manipulation is starkly prominent, as Saul presents the marriage offer as a royal favor while secretly intending it to be David's death sentence. This showcases the cunning and insidious tactics employed by those consumed by sin and fear. Lastly, and implicitly, the broader narrative consistently emphasizes Divine Protection and Providence over David. Despite Saul's elaborate and malevolent schemes, they ultimately fail to thwart God's sovereign plan for David's future, as evidenced by David's continued success and the unwavering presence of the Lord with him throughout these trials (e.g., 1 Samuel 18:14).

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

snare môwqêsh' H4170

This term (מֹקֵשׁ, H4170) literally refers to a trap, net, or noose, typically used for catching birds or animals. Metaphorically, as employed here, it signifies something that causes ruin, entanglement, or spiritual downfall. Saul's intention is for Michal, or more accurately, the conditions of marrying her, to be the deceptive instrument that leads David into a perilous situation designed for his demise. The word emphasizes the cunning, insidious, and ultimately destructive nature of Saul's plot, highlighting that it is not merely an obstacle but a device specifically engineered to capture and destroy.

hand yâd' H3027

The Hebrew word (יָד, H3027) for "hand" is a common term that, while denoting a physical appendage, frequently carries a broader meaning of power, authority, agency, active involvement, or even dominion. When Saul declares "that the hand of the Philistines may be against him," he is not merely referring to their physical presence but to their active, destructive power and military might. It implies that the Philistines would be the direct agents of David's death, thereby providing Saul with plausible deniability and absolving him of direct responsibility in the eyes of the people.

twain shᵉnayim' H8147

This archaic English word (from the Hebrew שְׁנַיִם, H8147) simply means "two." In this context, the phrase "in [the one of] the twain" refers to the two daughters Saul had either previously offered or considered for David: Merab, the elder, and now Michal, the younger. It highlights Saul's persistent, though varying and increasingly treacherous, attempts to use his daughters as pawns in his ongoing scheme against David, underscoring the continuity of his malicious and manipulative intent.

Verse Breakdown

"And Saul said, I will give him her"

This opening clause presents Saul's offer as a seemingly benevolent and honorable act, a king bestowing a daughter upon a deserving warrior. However, the immediate subsequent clauses swiftly expose the deceptive and malevolent nature of this pronouncement, revealing it as a calculated maneuver rather than a genuine blessing or reward.

"that she may be a snare to him"

This is the stark, chilling revelation of Saul's true, malicious intent. The marriage is not purposed for alliance, honor, or the well-being of his daughter or David, but is explicitly designed as a trap. Michal herself, or more accurately, the perilous conditions attached to marrying her, are intended to lead David into a life-threatening situation from which Saul desperately hopes he will not return. This phrase unmasks Saul's profound duplicity and the depth of his hatred and fear.

"and that the hand of the Philistines may be against him."

This clause precisely specifies the mechanism of the "snare." Saul intends to demand a bride-price (as revealed in the subsequent verses, 1 Samuel 18:25) that would necessitate David engaging in an exceedingly high-risk military encounter with Israel's formidable enemies, the Philistines. This is Saul's cowardly strategy to effectively send David to his death, highlighting his unwillingness to confront David directly and his willingness to sacrifice a national hero to Israel's adversaries for personal gain.

"Wherefore Saul said to David, Thou shalt this day be my son in law in [the one of] the twain."

This concluding clause depicts Saul's public presentation of the offer directly to David. He frames it as a renewed, honorable opportunity to become an integral part of the royal family, subtly referencing his previous, unfulfilled offer of Merab. This public declaration serves to maintain appearances, conceal his true, murderous intentions from David and the broader populace, and lend a veneer of legitimacy to his treachery, making his deceit even more profound.

Literary Devices

The passage employs several potent literary devices to amplify its thematic and emotional impact. Irony is profoundly evident, as Saul perverts the sacred institution of marriage—a covenant typically symbolizing union, blessing, and the continuation of life—into a deceptive instrument of murder. The offer of his own daughter, which should signify favor and alliance, is twisted into a deadly trap. There is also strong Foreshadowing, as Saul's repeated and increasingly indirect attempts to eliminate David (first the spear, then the broken promise of Merab, and now Michal and the Philistines) set the stage for the prolonged and bitter conflict that will define much of the remainder of 1 Samuel. This verse further develops Saul's Characterization, painting him as increasingly paranoid, manipulative, and morally bankrupt, standing in stark contrast to David's integrity and God-given success. The narrative also skillfully builds Dramatic Tension, as the reader is made acutely aware of Saul's sinister plot, while David remains largely unsuspecting, creating suspense about how God will continue to protect His anointed one amidst such malevolence.

Theological and Thematic Connections

1 Samuel 18:21 serves as a stark theological commentary on the destructive power of unchecked sin, particularly jealousy, fear, and pride, when allowed to fester in the human heart. Saul's actions demonstrate how these vices can lead to profound moral and spiritual decay, blinding an individual to honor, integrity, and even natural familial bonds. His attempt to manipulate divine institutions (marriage) and leverage national enemies (Philistines) for personal, murderous gain underscores the terrifying depths of human depravity when a heart is alienated from God's guiding hand and consumed by self-preservation. Yet, this passage implicitly highlights God's unwavering sovereignty and protective providence. Despite Saul's elaborate and malicious schemes, God's ultimate purpose for David's life and his anointing as king cannot be thwarted by human malice. This narrative powerfully reinforces the biblical truth that while human plans and intentions may abound, God's counsel and ultimate purpose will prevail, often turning even the most sinister intentions into opportunities for His divine plan to unfold.

Reflection and Application

This passage offers profound and enduring lessons for contemporary believers. Saul's tragic descent into treachery, fueled by corrosive jealousy and paralyzing fear, serves as a powerful and timeless warning against allowing such destructive emotions to take root and fester in our own hearts. We are called to vigilantly examine our motives, especially when confronted with situations or individuals who seem to threaten our status, security, or perceived importance. Saul's manipulative tactics remind us of the critical need to cultivate spiritual discernment, recognizing that appearances can be profoundly deceiving and that hidden, often malevolent, agendas can lurk even behind seemingly benevolent offers. In a world where manipulation, betrayal, and self-serving ambition are unfortunately common, this narrative encourages us to place our trust not in human schemes or fleeting promises, but in the unwavering faithfulness and sovereign protection of God. He is the one who ultimately safeguards His own and brings His divine purposes to fruition, even through the machinations of the wicked. Our response to perceived threats or rivals should always be rooted in faith, integrity, and prayer, rather than fear, deceit, or retaliation, mirroring David's steadfast trust in God amidst Saul's relentless and unjust pursuit.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How does Saul's unchecked envy in this passage challenge me to examine my own heart for similar destructive emotions, and what spiritual disciplines or practices can I implement to address them?
  2. In what specific ways might I be tempted to manipulate situations or people for my own perceived gain or security, and how can I resist such temptations by walking consistently in integrity and truth?
  3. How does trusting in God's unwavering sovereignty and protective hand, as powerfully demonstrated in David's life amidst Saul's schemes, help me navigate situations where I feel targeted, betrayed, or unjustly treated by others?

FAQ

Why did Saul use Michal as a "snare" instead of just killing David directly?

Saul's decision to use Michal as a "snare" (a trap) rather than directly killing David was a calculated move rooted in his cunning and fear of public backlash. Firstly, David was immensely popular with the people of Israel and Judah, universally beloved for his military victories and character 1 Samuel 18:16. A direct assassination would have undoubtedly sparked widespread outrage and likely a revolt, turning public opinion decisively against Saul and potentially leading to his overthrow. Secondly, Saul had already attempted to kill David directly with a spear on multiple occasions 1 Samuel 18:11, but these attempts miraculously failed, indicating God's protective hand over David. By using the Philistines as the instrument of David's demise, Saul could maintain a facade of innocence, claiming David died honorably in battle while secretly orchestrating his death. This allowed him to avoid direct culpability and public outcry, leveraging an external national enemy to achieve his murderous intent.

What does "in [the one of] the twain" mean?

The phrase "in [the one of] the twain" simply means "in one of the two." It refers to Saul's two daughters, Merab and Michal. Saul had previously offered his elder daughter Merab to David as a reward for his victory over Goliath, but then infamously reneged on that promise, giving her to Adriel the Meholathite instead 1 Samuel 18:17-19. Now, with the news that Saul's younger daughter, Michal, genuinely loved David 1 Samuel 18:20, Saul saw a renewed, albeit more insidious, opportunity to ensnare David. So, when he says to David, "Thou shalt this day be my son in law in [the one of] the twain," he is essentially re-extending a royal marriage offer, implying Michal, thereby re-establishing the prospect of David becoming part of the royal family, but with a deadly hidden agenda.

How does this event relate to God's plan for David?

This event, despite Saul's malicious and murderous intent, inadvertently served God's larger, sovereign plan for David's ascent. Saul's subsequent demand for a bride-price of 100 Philistine foreskins 1 Samuel 18:25 was explicitly designed to lead to David's death in battle. However, David not only survived this perilous task but exceeded the demand, triumphantly bringing 200 foreskins 1 Samuel 18:27. This extraordinary victory further solidified David's reputation as an unparalleled warrior and cemented his immense popularity among the people of Israel, making him even more formidable in the eyes of the populace and strengthening his legitimate claim to the throne. Thus, Saul's desperate attempt to thwart God's plan actually contributed directly to David's rise, powerfully demonstrating God's sovereign ability to use even the wicked schemes and intentions of men to accomplish His righteous and predetermined purposes.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

The treacherous plot of King Saul against David, the anointed one of God, finds profound Christ-centered fulfillment and resonance in the New Testament narrative. Saul's consuming jealousy and fear drove him to employ deceptive means and leverage external enemies to eliminate David, much as the religious and political leaders of Jesus' day, similarly motivated by envy and a perceived threat to their authority and power, conspired to eliminate God's ultimate Anointed One, Jesus Christ. Just as Saul sought to use the Philistines as a "snare" for David, so too did the Jewish leaders leverage the Roman authorities to execute Jesus, despite finding no fault in Him John 18:28-32. The betrayal by Judas, a close associate, for a price Matthew 26:14-16, chillingly echoes the manipulative and self-serving nature of Saul's deceptive offer. Yet, in both narratives, God's sovereign plan ultimately prevails. Saul's elaborate schemes against David ultimately failed to thwart God's purpose for David's kingship and the establishment of his dynasty. Likewise, the crucifixion of Jesus, though seemingly a triumph for His enemies and the culmination of their malicious plots, was in fact the predetermined, deliberate plan of God for the redemption of humanity Acts 2:23. The ultimate "snare" intended for Jesus—death on the cross—became the very means by which He triumphed decisively over sin, death, and the powers of darkness, rising victoriously to establish an eternal kingdom that no human plot or demonic scheme can ever overthrow Colossians 2:15. Jesus, the true Son of God and the ultimate Bridegroom of His Church Ephesians 5:25-27, overcame every snare and plot, securing not merely a temporary earthly throne, but eternal salvation and an everlasting inheritance for all who believe in His name.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Samuel 18:12–30. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 19 verses
Passage under comment1 Samuel 18:12–30
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Saul had now, in effect, proclaimed war with David. He began in open hostility when he threw the javelin at him. Now we are here told how his enmity proceeded, and how David received the attacks of it.

I.See how Saul expressed his malice against David.

1.He was afraid of him, Sa1 18:12. Perhaps he pretended to be afraid that David would do himself mischief, to force his way to the crown. Those that design ill against others are commonly willing to have it thought that others design ill against them. But David's withdrawal (Sa1 18:11) was a plain evidence that he was far from such a thought. However, he really stood in awe of him, as Herod feared John, Mar 6:20. Saul was sensible that he had lost the favourable presence of God himself, and that David had it, and for this reason he feared him. Note, Those are truly great and to be reverenced that have God with them. The more wisely David behaved himself the more Saul feared him, Sa1 18:15, and again Sa1 18:29. Men think the way to be feared is to hector and threaten, which makes them feared by fools only, but despised by the wise and good; whereas the way to be both feared and loved, feared by those to whom we would wish to be a terror and loved by those to whom we would wish to be a delight, is to behave ourselves wisely. Wisdom makes the face to shine and commands respect.

2.He removed him from court, and gave him a regiment in the country, Sa1 18:13. He made him captain over 1000, that he might be from under his eye, because he hated the sight of him; and that he might not secure the interest of the courtiers. Yet herein he did impolitely; for it gave David an opportunity of ingratiating himself with the people, who therefore loved him (Sa1 18:16) because he went out and came in before them, that is, he presided in the business of his country, civil as well as military, and have universal satisfaction.

3.He stirred him up to take all occasions of quarrelling with the Philistines and engaging them (Sa1 18:17), insinuating to him that hereby he would do good service to his prince (be thou valiant for me), and good service to his God (fight the Lord's battles), and a kindness to himself too, for hereby he would qualify himself for the honour he designed him, which was to marry his eldest daughter to him. This he had merited by killing Goliath, for it was promised by proclamation to him that should do that exploit (Sa1 17:25); but David was so modest as not to demand it, and now, when Saul proposed it, it was with design of mischief to him, to make him venture upon hazardous attempts, saying in his heart, Let the hand of the Philistines be upon him, hoping that he would some time or other be the death of him; yet how could he expect this when he saw that God was with him?

4.He did what he could to provoke him to discontent and mutiny, by breaking his promise with him, and giving his daughter to another when the time came that she should have been given to him, Sa1 18:19. This was as great an affront as he could possibly put upon him, and touched him both in his honour and in his love. He therefore thought David's resentment of it would break out in some indecency or other, in word or deed, which might give him an advantage against him to take him off by the course of law. Thus evil men seek mischief.

5.When he was disappointed in his, he proffered him his other daughter (who it seems had a secret kindness for David, Sa1 18:20), but with this design, that she might be a snare to him, Sa1 18:21.

(1.)Perhaps he hoped that she would, even after her marriage to David, take part with her father against her husband, and give him an opportunity of doing David an unkindness. However,

(2.)The conditions of the marriage, he hoped, would be his destruction; for (so zealous will Saul seem against the Philistines) the conditions of the marriage must be that he killed 100 Philistines, and, as proofs that those he had slain were uncircumcised, he must bring in their foreskins cut off; this would be a just reproach upon the Philistines, who hated circumcision as it was an ordinance of God; and perhaps David, in doing this, would the more exasperate them against him, and make them seek to be revenged on him, which was the thing that Saul desired and designed, much more than to be avenged on the Philistines: For Saul thought to make David fall by the Philistines, Sa1 18:25. See here,

[1.]What cheats bad men put upon themselves. Saul's conscience would not suffer him, except when the evil spirit was actually upon him, to aim at David's life himself, for even he could not but conceive a horror at the thought of murdering such an innocent and excellent person; but he thought that to expose him designedly to the Philistines had nothing bad in it (Let not my hand be upon him, but the hand of the Philistines), whereas that malicious design against him was as truly murder before God as if he had slain him with his own hands.

[2.]What cheats they put upon the world. Saul pretended extraordinary kindness for David even when he aimed at his ruin, and was actually plotting it: Thou shalt be my son-in-law, says he (Sa1 18:21), notwithstanding he hated him implacably. Perhaps David refers to this when (Psa 55:21) he speaks of his enemy as one whose words were smoother than butter, but war was in his heart. It is probable that Saul's employing his servants to persuade David to enter into a treaty of a match with his daughter Michal (Sa1 18:22) arose from an apprehension that either his having cheated him about his elder daughter (Sa1 18:19) or the hardness of the terms he intended now to propose would make him decline it.

II.See how David conducted himself when the tide of Saul's displeasure ran thus high against him.

1.He behaved himself wisely in all his ways. He perceived Saul's jealousy of him, which made him very cautious and circumspect in every thing he said and did, and careful to give no offence. He did not complain of hard measure more make himself the head of a party, but managed all the affairs he was entrusted with as one that made it his business to do real service to his king and country, looking upon that to be the end of his preferment. And then the Lord was with him to give him success in all his undertakings. Though he procured Saul's ill-will by it, yet he obtained God's favour. Compare this with Psa 101:2, where it is David's promise, I will behave myself wisely; and that promise he here performed; and it is his prayer, O, when wilt thou come unto me? And that prayer God here answered: The Lord was with him. However blind fortune may seem to favour fools, God will own and bless those that behave themselves wisely.

2.When it was proposed to him to be son-in-law to the king he once and again received the proposal with all possible modesty and humility. When Saul proposed his elder daughter to him (Sa1 18:18) he said, Who am I, and what is my life? When the courtier proposed the younger, he took no notice of the affront Saul had put upon him in disposing of the elder from him, but continued in the same mind (Sa1 18:23): Seemeth it a light thing to you to be a king's son-in-law, seeing that I am a poor man and lightly esteemed? He knew Michal loved him, and yet did not offer to improve his interest in her affections for the gaining of her without her father's consent, but waited till it was proposed to him. And then see,

(1.)How highly he speaks of the honour offered him: To be son-in-law to the king. Though his king was but an upstart, in his original as mean as himself, in his management no better than he should be, yet, being a crowned head, he speaks of him and the royal family with all due respect. Note, Religion is so far from teaching us to be rude and unmannerly that it does not allow us to be so. We must render honour to whom honour is due.

(2.)How humbly he speaks of himself: Who am I? This did not proceed from a mean, abject, sneaking spirit, for when there was occasion he made it appear that he had as high a sense of honour as most men; nor was it from his jealousy of Saul (though he had reason enough to fear a snake under the green grass), but from him true and deep humility: Who am I, a poor man, and lightly esteemed? David had as much reason as any man to value himself. He was of an ancient and honourable family of Judah, a comely person, a great statesman and soldier; his achievements were great, for he had won Goliath's head and Michal's heart. He knew himself destined by the divine counsels to the throne of Israel, and yet, Whom am I, and what is my life? Note, It well becomes us, however God has advanced us, always to have low thoughts of ourselves. He that humbleth himself shall be exalted. And, if David thus magnified the honour of being son-in-law to the king, how should we magnify the honour of being sons (not in law, but in gospel) to the King of kings! Behold what manner of love the Father has bestowed upon us! Who are we that we should be thus dignified?

3.When the slaying of 100 Philistines was made the condition of David's marrying Saul's daughter he readily closed with it (Sa1 18:26): It pleased David well to be the king's son-in-law upon those terms; and, before the time given him for the action had expired, he doubled the demand, and slew 200, Sa1 18:27. He would not seem to suspect that Saul designed his hurt by it (though he had reason enough), but would rather act as if Saul had meant to consult his honour, and therefore cheerfully undertook it, as became a brave soldier and a true lover, though we may suppose it uneasy to Michal. David hereby discovered likewise,

(1.)A great confidence in the divine protection. He knew God was with him, and therefore, whatever Saul hoped, David did not fear falling by the Philistines, though he must needs expose himself much by such an undertaking as this.

(2.)A great zeal for the good of his country, which he would not decline any occasion of doing service to, though with the hazard of his life.

(3.)A right notion of honour, which consists not so much in being preferred as in deserving to be so. David was then pleased with the thoughts of being the king's son-in-law when he found the honour set at this high price, being more solicitous how to merit it than how to obtain it; nor could he wear it with satisfaction till he had won it.

4.Even after he was married he continued his good services to Israel. When the princes of the Philistines began to move towards another war David was ready to oppose them, and behaved himself more wisely than all the servants of Saul, Sa1 18:30. The law dispensed with men from going to war the first year after they were married (Deu 24:5), but David loved his country too well to make use of that dispensation. Many that have shown themselves forward to serve the public when they have been in pursuit of preferment have declined it when they have gained their point; but David acted from more generous principles.

III.Observe how God brought good to David out of Saul's project against him.

1.Saul gave him his daughter to be a snare to him, but in this respect that marriage was a kindness to him, that his being Saul's son-in-law made his succeeding him much the less invidious, especially when so many of his sons were slain with him, Sa1 31:2.

2.Saul thought, by putting him upon dangerous services, to have him taken off, but that very thing confirmed his interest in the people; for the more he did against the Philistines the better they loved him, so that his name was much set by (Sa1 18:30), which would make his coming to the crown the more easy. Thus God makes even the wrath of man to praise him and serves his designs of kindness to his own people by it.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Three Centuries of Reception

2 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

2 quotes · AD 735–1022
Early Medieval
8009001000

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

AD 735BedeEarly MedievalSourceCommentary on Samuel
Therefore Saul said to David: “In two things you will be my son-in-law today,” etc. Ignoring the words of Saul, which clearly signify the hypocrisy of scribes and Pharisees with their deceit and fraud, by which they sought to entrap the Lord, let us instead scrutinize more closely the mighty deeds of blessed David, because he became Saul’s son-in-law in two things, namely, by killing the giant and by bringing the foreskins of Philistine slain. Clearly signifying him who, in order to adopt the Church from the Jews, first nullified the snares and strength of the ancient enemy and delivered it into light; and thereafter proposed to the same Church the examples of converted Gentiles to be emulated. For it was from the Gentiles, whose faith the Lord showed to be emulated by the Jews, when he said: "Amen, I say to you, I have not found such great faith in Israel" (Matthew VIII). From the Gentiles came she who merited to hear from Christ: "O woman, great is your faith; let it be done for you as you wish" (Matthew XV). From the Gentiles were those who, having come up among others to worship at the feast, said to Philip: "Sir, we wish to see Jesus" (John XII). From the Gentiles was also that centurion who, when the Lord gave up His Spirit, stood alone with his company, while all the Jews who were present remained silent, and feared and glorified God, saying: “Truly this man was the Son of God” (Mark XV). Certainly, when Saul, weaving deceit, said:
AD 1022Symeon the New TheologianEarly MedievalSourceDISCOURSES 4.2
Why did Saul seek to apprehend and kill David whom he had formerly honored as himself and greatly loved as a benefactor? Was it by nature or out of an evil will? Obviously it was out of ill will. No one is born evil by nature, since God did not create evil works but things that were very good. Or, rather, he did so since he is good, and that not by disposition and choice but in nature and in truth.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Samuel 18:21 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8