TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Matthew 2:16–18. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Here is, I. Herod's resentment of the departure of the wise men. He waited long for their return; he hopes, though they be slow, they will be sure, and he shall crush this rival at his first appearing; but he hears, upon enquiry, that they are gone off another way, which increases his jealousy, and makes him suspect they are in the interest of this new King, which made him exceedingly wroth; and he is the more desperate and outrageous for his being disappointed. Note, Inveterate corruption swells the higher for the obstructions it meets with in a sinful pursuit.
II.His political contrivance, notwithstanding this, to take off him that is born King of the Jews.
If he could not reach him by a particular execution, he doubted not but to involve him in a general stroke, which, like the sword of war, should devour one as well as another. This would be sure work; and thus those that would destroy their own iniquity must be sure to destroy all their iniquities. Herod was an Edomite, enmity to Israel was bred in the bone with him. Doeg was an Edomite, who, for David's sake, slew all the priests of the Lord. It was strange that Herod could find any so inhuman as to be employed in such a bloody and barbarous piece of work; but wicked hands never want wicked tools to work with. Little children have always been taken under the special protection, not only of human laws, but of human nature; yet these are sacrificed to the rage of this tyrant, under whom, as under Nero, innocence is the least security. Herod was, throughout his reign, a bloody man; it was not long before, that he destroyed the whole Sanhedrim, or bench of judges; but blood to the blood-thirsty is like drink to those in a dropsy; Quo plus sunt potae, plus sitiuntur aquae - The more they drink, the more thirsty they become. Herod was now about seventy years old, so that an infant, at this time under two years old, was not likely ever to give him any disturbance. Nor was he a man over fond of his own children, or of their preferment, having formerly slain two of his own sons, Alexander and Aristobulus, and his son Antipater after this, but five days before he himself died; so that it was purely to gratify his own brutish lusts of pride and cruelty that he did this. All is fish that comes to his net.
Observe, What large measures he took, 1. As to time; He slew all from two years old and under. It is probable that the blessed Jesus was at this time not a year old; yet Herod took in all the infants under two years old, that he might be sure not to miss of his prey. He cares not how many heads fall, which he allows to be innocent, provided that escape not which he supposes to be guilty. 2. As to place; He kills all the male children, not only in Bethlehem, but in all the coasts thereof, in all the villages of that city. This was being overmuch wicked, Ecc 7:17. Hate, an unbridled wrath, armed with an unlawful power, often transports men to the most absurd and unreasonable instances of cruelty. It was no unrighteous thing for God to permit this; every life is forfeited to his justice as soon as it commences; that sin which entered by one man's disobedience, introduced death with it; and we are not to suppose any thing more than that common guilt, we are not to suppose that these children were sinners above all that were in Israel, because they suffered such things. God's judgments are a great deep. The diseases and deaths of little children are proofs of original sin. But we must look upon this murder of the infants under another character: it was their martyrdom. How early did persecution commence against Christ and his kingdom! Think ye that he came to send peace on the earth? No, but a sword, such a sword as this, Mat 10:34, Mat 10:35. A passive testimony was hereby given to the Lord Jesus. As when he was in the womb, he was witnessed to by a child's leaping in the womb for joy at his approach, so now, at two years old, he had contemporary witnesses to him of the same age. They shed their blood for him, who afterwards shed his for them. These were the infantry of the noble army of martyrs. If these infants were thus baptized with blood, though it were their own, into the church triumphant, it could not be said but that, with what they got in heaven, they were abundantly recompensed for what they lost on earth. Out of the mouths of these babes and sucklings God did perfect his praise; otherwise, it is not good to the Almighty that he should thus afflict.
The tradition of the Greek church (and we have it in the Aethiopic missal) is, that the number of the children slain was 14,000; but that is very absurd. I believe, if the births of the male children in the weekly bills were computed, there would not be found so many under two years old, in one of the most populous cities in the world, that was not near a fortieth part of it. But it is an instance of the vanity of tradition. It is strange that Josephus does not relate this story; but he wrote long after St. Matthew, and it is probable that he therefore would not relate it, because he would not so far countenance the Christian history; for he was a zealous Jew; but, to be sure, if it had not been true and well attested, he would have contested it. Macrobius, a heathen writer, tells us, that when Augustus Caesar heard that Herod, among the children he order to be slain under two years old, slew his own son, he passed this jest upon him, That it was better to be Herod's swine than his son. The usage of the country forbade him to kill a swine, but nothing could restrain him from killing his son. Some think that he had a young child at nurse in Bethlehem; others think that, through mistake, two events are confounded - the murder of the infants, and the murder of his son Antipater. But for the church of Rome to put the Holy Innocents, as they call them, into their calendar, and observe a day in memory of them, while they have so often, by their barbarous massacres, justified, and even out - one Herod, is but to do as their predecessors did, who built the tombs of the prophets, while they themselves filled up the same measure.
Some observe another design of Providence in the murder of the infants. By all the prophecies of the Old Testament it appears that Bethlehem was the place, and this the time, of the Messiah's nativity; now all the children of Bethlehem, born at this time, being murdered, and Jesus only escaping, none but Jesus could pretend to be the Messiah. Herod now thought he had baffled all the Old Testament prophecies, had defeated the indications of the star, and the devotions of the wise men, by ridding the country of this new King; having burnt the hive, he concludes he had killed the master bee; but God in heaven laughs at him, and has him in derision. Whatever crafty cruel devices are in men's hearts, the counsel of the Lord shall stand.
III.The fulfilling of scripture in this (Mat 2:17, Mat 2:18); Then was fulfilled that prophecy (Jer 31:15), A voice was heard in Ramah.
See and adore the fulness of the scripture! That prediction was accomplished in Jeremiah's time, when Nebuzaradan, after he had destroyed Jerusalem, brought all his prisoners to Ramah (Jer 40:1), and there disposed of them as he pleased, for the sword, or for captivity. Then was the cry in Ramah heard to Bethlehem (for those two cities, the one in Judah's lot, and the other in Benjamin's, were not far asunder); but now the prophecy is again fulfilled in the great sorrow that was for the death of these infants. The scripture was fulfilled,
1.In the place of this mourning. The noise of it was heard from Bethlehem to Ramah; for Herod's cruelty extended itself to all the coasts of Bethlehem, even into the lot of Benjamin, among the children of Rachel. Some think the country about Bethlehem was called Rachel, because there she died, and was buried. Rachel's sepulchre was hard by Bethlehem, Gen 35:16, Gen 35:19. Compare Sa1 10:2. Rachel had her heart much set upon children: the son she died in travail of she called Benoni - the son of her sorrow. These mothers were like Rachel, lived near Rachel's grave, and many of them descended from Rachel; and therefore their lamentations are elegantly represented by Rachel's weeping.
2.In the degree of this mourning. It was lamentation and mourning, and great mourning; all little enough to express the sense they had of this aggravated calamity. There was a great cry in Egypt when the first-born were slain, and so there was here when the youngest was slain; for whom we naturally have a particular tenderness. Here was a representation of this world we live in. We hear in it lamentation, and weeping, and mourning, and see the tears of the oppressed, some upon one account, and some upon another. Our ways lie through a vale of tears. This sorrow was so great, that they would not be comforted. They hardened themselves in it, and took a pleasure in their grief. Blessed be God, there is no occasion of grief in this world, no, not that which is supplied by sin itself, that will justify us in refusing to be comforted! They would not be comforted, because they are not, that is, they are not in the land of the living, are not as they were, in their mothers' embraces. If, indeed, they were not, there might be some excuse for sorrowing as though we had no hope; but we know they are not lost, but gone before; if we forget that they are, we lose the best ground of our comfort, Th1 4:13. Some make this grief of the Bethlehemites to be a judgment upon them for their contempt of Christ. They that would not rejoice for the birth of the Son of God, are justly made to weep for the death of their own sons; for they only wondered at the tidings the shepherds brought them, but did not welcome them.
The quoting of this prophecy might serve to obviate an objection which some would make against Christ, upon this sad providence. "Can the Messiah, who is to be the Consolation of Israel, be introduced with all this lamentation?" Yes, for so it was foretold, and the scripture must be accomplished. And besides, if we look further into this prophecy, we shall find that the bitter weeping in Ramah was but a prologue to the greatest joy, for it follows, Thy work shall be rewarded, and there is hope in thy end. The worse things are, the sooner they will mend. Unto them a child was born, sufficient to repair their losses.
Historical interpretation
Nine Centuries of Reception
18 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
But (we hold the contrary): for Christ, by "accepting praise out of the mouth of babes and sucklings," has declared that neither childhood nor infancy is without sensibility, -the former of which states, when meeting Him with approving shouts, proved its ability to offer Him testimony; while the other, by being slaughtered, for His sake of course, knew what violence meant.
In Bethlehem therefore all the babies were slain. These innocents who died then on Christ’s behalf became the first martyrs of Christ. David refers to them when he says, “From the mouths of nursing babies you have perfected praise because of your enemies, that you might bring ruin to the enemy.” … For in this persecution even tiny infants and nursing babies were killed on Christ’s behalf and attained to the consummate praise of martyrs. Meanwhile the wicked king Herod was destroyed, he who had usurped the realm to defend himself against the king of the heavens. Thus it is that those blessed babes have deservedly lasted beyond others. They were the first who were worthy to die on Christ’s behalf.
For Herod, as we have said, in his desire to destroy the Savior of the world, sent word to Bethlehem and commanded that all children two years of age and under be killed, figuring the age according to the time that he had learned from the magi. He thought that his edict would reach even to the Lord himself, the source of life. The Holy Spirit had already foreseen his wickedness beforehand. Solomon, speaking for the church, had said, “Who will give to you my brother, the one who nurses at the breast of his mother?” Moreover, by saying, “Who will give to you?” he was demonstrating that Herod would have no power over him who is the Lord and Prince of all powers. Thus the Lord spoke rightly when he bore witness about himself through the same Solomon: “Evil men will seek and not find me. For they hate wisdom and moreover have not partaken of the Word of God and have had no desire for it.” The Spirit also said through David: “Since you are the one who gave birth to me, you are my hope, my mother, from the time I nursed at your breast … you are my protector.” The blessed Moses also relates that Christ the Lord, an infant, could not have been killed while still nursing. He gave witness to this with his words, “You will not cook a lamb in the milk of its own mother.” In this exact statement Moses revealed the expectation that Christ our Lord would be the true Lamb of God who was to suffer at the appointed time.
"Yea," saith one, "Herod thou hast full well deprived of excuse, and proved him blood-thirsty; but thou hast not yet solved the question about the injustice of what took place. For if he did unjustly, wherefore did God permit it?" Now, what should we say to this? That which I do not cease to say continually, in church, in the market-place and everywhere; that which I also wish you carefully to keep in mind, for it is a sort of rule for us, suited to every such perplexity. What then is our rule, and what our saying? That although there be many that injure, yet is there not so much as one that is injured. And in order that the riddle may not disturb you too much, I add the solution too with all speed. I mean, that what we may suffer unjustly from any one, it tells either to the doing away of our sins, God so putting that wrong to our account; or unto the recompense of rewards.
Wherefore art thou wroth, O Herod, at being mocked of the wise men? didst thou not know that the birth was divine? didst thou not summon the chief priests? didst thou not gather together the scribes? did not they, being called, bring the prophet also with them into thy court of judgment, proclaiming these things beforehand from of old? Didst thou not see how the old things agreed with the new? Didst thou not hear that a star also ministered to these men? Didst thou not reverence the zeal of the barbarians? Didst thou not marvel at their boldness? Wast thou not horror-struck at the truth of the prophet? Didst thou not from the former things perceive the very last also? Wherefore didst thou not reason with thyself from all these things, that this event was not of the craft of the wise men, but of a Divine Power, duly dispensing all things? And even if thou wert deceived by the wise men, what is that to the young children, who have done no wrong?
"Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked of the wise men, was exceeding wroth."
Yet surely it was a case not for anger, but for fear and awe: he ought to have perceived that he was attempting impossible things. But he is not refrained. For when a soul is insensible and incurable, it yields to none of the medicines given by God. See for example this man following up his former efforts, and adding many murders to one, and hurried down the steep any whither. For driven wild by this anger, and envy, as by some demon, he takes account of nothing, but rages even against nature herself, and his anger against the wise men who had mocked him he vents upon the children that had done no wrong: venturing then in Palestine upon a deed akin to the things that had been done in Egypt. For he "sent forth," it is said, "and slew all the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had diligently inquired of the wise men."
"But what kind of sin had these children," it may be said, "that they should do it away? for touching those who are of full age, and have been guilty of many negligences, one might with show of reason speak thus: but they who so underwent premature death, what sort of sins did they by their sufferings put away?" Didst thou not hear me say, that though there were no sins, there is a recompense of rewards hereafter for them that suffer ill here? Wherein then were the young children hurt in being slain for such a cause, and borne away speedily into that waveless harbor? "Because," sayest thou, "they would in many instances have achieved, had they lived, many and great deeds of goodness" Why, for this cause He lays up for them beforehand no small reward, the ending their lives for such a cause. Besides, if the children were to have been any great persons, He would not have suffered them to be snatched away beforehand. For if they that eventually will live in continual wickedness are endured by Him with so great long-sufferings, much more would He not have suffered these to be so taken off had He foreknown they would accomplish any great things.
And these are the reasons we have to give; yet these are not all; but there are also others more mysterious than these, which He knoweth perfectly, who Himself ordereth these things. Let us then give up unto Him the more perfect understanding of this matter, and apply ourselves to what follows, and in the calamities of others let us learn to bear all things nobly. Yea, for it was no little scene of woe, which then befell Bethlehem, the children were snatched from their mother's breast, and dragged unto this unjust slaughter.
And if thou art yet faint-hearted, and not equal to controlling thyself in these things, learn the end of him who dared all this, and recover thyself a little. For very quickly was he overtaken by punishment for these things; and he paid the due penalty of such an abominable act, ending his life by a grievous death, and more pitiable than that which he now dared inflict; suffering also countless additional ills.
Here attend to me carefully. Because many things are uttered by many very idly touching these children, and the course of events is charged with injustice, and some of these express their perplexity about it in a more moderate way, others with more of audaciousness and frenzy. In order then that we may free these of their madness and those of their perplexity, suffer us to discourse a little upon this topic. Plainly, then, if this be their charge, that the children were left to be slain, they should find fault likewise with the slaughter of the soldiers that kept Peter. For as here, when the young child had fled, other children are massacred in the place of Him who was sought; even so then, too, Peter having been delivered from his prison and chains by the angel, one of like name with this tyrant, and like temper too, when he had sought him, and found him not, slew instead of him the soldiers that kept him.
"But what is this? it may be said; "why this is not a solution, but an enhancement of our difficulty." I know it too, and for this intent I bring forward all such cases, that to all I may adduce one and the same solution. What then is the solution of these things? or what fair account of them can we give? That Christ was not the cause of their slaughter, but the king's cruelty; as indeed neither was Peter to those others, but the madness of Herod.
(Verse 15, 16.) So that what was spoken by the Lord through the prophet might be fulfilled, saying: Out of Egypt I called my son. Then Herod, when he saw that he had been tricked by the wise men, became furious, and he sent and killed all the male children who were in Bethlehem and in all its districts, from two years old and under, according to the time that he had ascertained from the wise men. Let those who deny the truth of the Hebrew scriptures answer where this is read in the Septuagint translators. But since they did not find it, we will tell them it is written in the prophet Hosea (Chapter 11), as they can also confirm with the copies we recently published. However, we can reconcile (or console) this passage differently for the contentious, whose behavior the Apostle Paul denies having. And we present the testimony from Numbers, with Balaam saying: God has called him out of Egypt; His glory is like a unicorn (Numbers 23:22).
He gave orders that not only the children in Bethlehem but even those in the outlying districts of the town be killed, thinking that amid the multitude of those killed would be the one he was seeking. Herod ordered those who were two years old and under to be slaughtered. He had calculated such was the time that had passed from the incarnation of Christ, taking into account the time the magi had spent on their journey and that which he had spent on the throne. But Christ was taken out of Bethlehem once night had arrived. It is not possible that the birth of Christ be the cause of the killing of the children. But the disclosure of Herod’s child-killing marked the beginning of a long string of wickedness. Even those who crucified Christ were not wicked at the time when they arrested Christ. Rather, they became wicked at the time when they undertook his murder. Yet for Christ’s sake the children will receive a good reward, fitting to their martyrdom.
(non occ.) And while he thus persecutes Christ, he furnished an army (of martyrs) clothed in white robes of the same age as the Lord.
(Serm. 220. App.) Behold how this unrighteous enemy never could have so much profited these infants by his love, as he did by his hate; for as much as iniquity abounded against them, so much did the grace of blessing abound on them.
(Serm. 373. 3.) O blessed infants! He only will doubt of your crown in this your passion for Christ, who doubts that the baptism of Christ has a benefit for infants. He who at His birth had Angels to proclaim Him, the heavens to testify, and Magi to worship Him, could surely have prevented that these should not have died for Him, had He not known that they died not in that death, but rather lived in higher bliss. Far be the thought, that Christ who came to set men free, did nothing to reward those who died in His behalf, when hanging on the cross He prayed for those who put Him to death.
(Serm. 132. App.) The Magi had seen this unknown star in the heavens, not a few days, but two years before, as they had informed Herod when he enquired. This caused him to fix two years old and under; as it follows, according to the time he had enquired of the Magi.
(Gloss. ord.) Or because he feared that the Child to whom even stars ministered, might transform His appearance to greater or under that of His own age, or might conceal all those of that age: hence it seems to be that he slew all from one day to two years old.
(de Cons. Ev. ii. 11.) Or, disturbed by pressure of still more imminent dangers, Herod's thoughts are drawn to other thoughts than the slaughter of children, he might suppose that the Magi, unable to find Him whom they had supposed born, were ashamed to return to him. So the days of purification being accomplished, they might go up in safety to Jerusalem. And who does not see that that one day they may have escaped the attention of a King occupied with so many cares, and that afterwards when the things done in the Temple came to be spread abroad, then Herod discovered that he had been deceived by the Magi, and then sent and slew the children.
Why did Christ do this? Christ is the judge of thoughts and the examiner of minds. Why did he desert those whom he knew were being sought because of himself and whom he knew would be killed for his sake? He was born a king, the king of heaven—why did he neglect the standard-bearers of his own innocence? Why did he disdain an army of the same age as himself? Why did he thus abandon those who were cut down as plunder from the same cradle as himself? Was it so that he, who would become the one king, might proceed against the forces of all his enemies? Brothers, Christ did not despise his own soldiers but promoted them and granted that they might walk in victory before they lived. He enabled them to participate in a victory without struggle. He gave to them the gift of the crown even before their bodies had grown. It was Christ’s will that they pass over vice for virtue, attain heaven before earth and share in the divine life immediately. Thus it was that Christ sent his soldiers ahead. He did not abandon them. He gathered up his ranks. He did not leave them behind.
When the infant Jesus had subdued the Magi, not by the might of His flesh, but the grace of His Spirit, Herod was exceeding wrath, that they whom he sitting on his throne had no power to move, were obedient to an Infant lying in a manger. Then by their contempt of him the Magi gave further cause of wrath. For when kings' wrath is stirred by fear for their crowns, it is a great and inextinguishable wrath. But what did he? He sent and slew all the children. As a wounded beast rends whatsoever meeteth it as if the cause of its smart, so he mocked by the Magi spent his fury on children. He said to himself in his fury, 'Surely the Magi have found the Child whom they said should be King;' for a king in fear for his crown fears all things, suspects all. Then he sent and slew all those infants, that he might secure one among so many.
In Joseph is figured the order of preachers, in Mary Holy Scripture; by the Child the knowledge of the Saviour; by the cruelty of Herod the persecution which the Church suffered in Jerusalem; by Joseph's flight into Egypt the passing of the preachers to the unbelieving Gentiles, (for Egypt signifies darkness;) by the time that he abode in Egypt the space of time between the ascension of the Lord and the coming of Anti Christ; by Herod's death the extinction of jealousy in the hearts of the Jews.
(Hom. in Nat. Innocent.) In this death of the children the precious death of all Christ's martyrs is figured; that they were infants signifies, that by the merit of humility alone can we come to the glory of martyrdom; that they were slain in Bethlehem and the coasts thereof, that the persecution shall be both in Jerusalem whence the Church originated, and throughout the world; in those of two years old are figured the perfect in doctrine and works; those under that age the neophytes; that they were slain while Christ escaped, signifies that the bodies of the martyrs may be destroyed by the wicked, but that Christ cannot be taken from them.
He is not satisfied with the massacre at Bethlehem, but extends it to the adjacent villages; sparing no age from the child of one night old, to that of two years.
As God used Moses to trick Pharaoh, so, too, He used the Magi to trick Herod. For both Herod and Pharaoh were child slayers: Pharaoh slew the male children of the Hebrews in Egypt, and Herod slew the male children of the Hebrews in Bethlehem. Herod vents his wrath against the Magi upon those who had wronged him in nothing. Why were the children allowed to be slaughtered? So that Herod’s wickedness might be revealed. But perhaps you will ask me, "Why did the children suffer wrong to show Herod’s wickedness?" Listen then. They were not wronged but were made worthy of crowns. For anyone who suffers some evil here, suffers either so that his sins might be absolved, or so that his crowns might be multiplied. So it is with these children; for their suffering they will receive a greater crown in heaven.
Continue studying Matthew 2:16 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Matthew 2:16 records the horrific response of King Herod the Great upon realizing he had been outwitted by the wise men. Enraged by their failure to return and disclose the location of the newborn "King of the Jews," Herod unleashed his tyrannical power, ordering the slaughter of all male children two years old and under in Bethlehem and its surrounding regions, calculating the age range based on the information he had meticulously gathered from the wise men regarding the star's appearance. This brutal act, often termed the "Slaughter of the Innocents," underscores Herod's profound insecurity and the early, violent opposition faced by the infant Messiah.
Context
Literary Context
This verse marks a dramatic and tragic turning point in the narrative of Jesus's early life, immediately following the wise men's visit and their divinely-warned departure by an alternate route Matthew 2:12. Herod's initial feigned interest in worshiping the new king Matthew 2:8 is exposed as a murderous plot. The wise men's obedience to God's warning directly precipitates Herod's fury and subsequent decree. Crucially, this event also directly precedes Joseph's divinely-instructed flight to Egypt with Mary and Jesus Matthew 2:13-15, ensuring the child's safety and setting the stage for the fulfillment of prophecy in the subsequent verses Matthew 2:17-18. The narrative highlights the stark contrast between human malice and divine providence.
Historical & Cultural Context
King Herod the Great (ruled 37-4 BC) was a paranoid and ruthless ruler, notorious for his cruelty, even towards his own family members whom he suspected of treason. Appointed "King of the Jews" by Rome, he was deeply insecure about any potential rival to his throne. The news of a "king of the Jews" born in Bethlehem, even from foreign astrologers, would have immediately triggered his deep-seated fear of losing power. Bethlehem, a small town just a few miles south of Jerusalem, was significant as the prophesied birthplace of the Messiah Micah 5:2. The "two years old and under" timeframe reflects Herod's meticulous inquiry about the star's first appearance Matthew 2:7, indicating a calculated attempt to ensure the infant Messiah's destruction by casting a wide net. This act was consistent with Herod's known character and the political climate of the Roman-occupied Judea.
Key Themes
Matthew 2:16 powerfully contributes to several key themes within the Gospel of Matthew and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it vividly portrays Herod's Tyranny and Insecurity, showcasing the extreme lengths to which worldly power will go to protect its perceived dominion against God's appointed King. Secondly, it highlights the theme of Opposition to Christ from Birth, demonstrating that the arrival of God's salvation immediately provokes fierce resistance from the forces of evil, foreshadowing the rejection and suffering Jesus would endure throughout His ministry and ultimately on the cross. Thirdly, despite the tragedy, the verse implicitly emphasizes God's Unfailing Providence and Protection, as the infant Jesus was already safely in Egypt due to divine warning Matthew 2:13. Finally, this event, though horrific, serves as a direct catalyst for the Fulfillment of Prophecy, specifically Jeremiah's lament over Rachel weeping for her children, as noted in the subsequent verses Matthew 2:17-18 referencing Jeremiah 31:15.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
From en and paízō, meaning "to jeer at, i.e., deride." Herod perceived the wise men's non-return as a personal affront, a public humiliation where he felt scorned and made a fool of. This feeling of being outwitted fueled his intense rage and desperate, violent reaction.
From thymós, meaning "to put in a passion, i.e., enrage." The KJV's "exceeding wroth" (with G3029, lían, meaning "much, exceedingly") accurately conveys the intensity of Herod's anger. This was not mere displeasure but a profound, boiling fury that drove him to commit an atrocity. It speaks to an uncontrolled, violent outburst of wrath.
From anás and hairesis, meaning "to take up, i.e., adopt; by implication, to take away (violently), i.e., abolish, murder." This verb emphasizes the violent and decisive nature of Herod's command. It was a deliberate act of murder, intended to eradicate a perceived threat to his power, highlighting the brutal reality of his reign.
Verse Breakdown
"Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked of the wise men, was exceeding wroth,"
This opening clause establishes the catalyst for Herod's heinous act. The word "Then" (G5119, tóte) indicates a direct consequence of the wise men's departure. Herod's perception of being "mocked" (G1702, empaízō) by the wise men's failure to return as instructed, combined with his inherent paranoia, ignited an "exceeding wroth" (G3029 lían and G2373 thymóō) rage. This wrath was not simply anger but a passionate, violent fury, typical of his tyrannical character when his authority or security was challenged.
"and sent forth, and slew all the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof,"
Driven by his uncontrollable rage, Herod immediately "sent forth" (G649, apostéllō) his soldiers to execute his terrible decree. The object of his fury was "all the children" (G3816, paîs) in Bethlehem (G965, Bēthleém), the prophesied birthplace of the Messiah, and "in all the coasts thereof" (G3725, hórion), meaning the surrounding districts or borders. This indicates a widespread, indiscriminate slaughter, targeting an entire demographic within a specific geographical area to ensure the elimination of the perceived threat.
"from two years old and under, according to the time which he had diligently enquired of the wise men."
This final clause specifies the age range of the victims and the basis for Herod's calculation. The phrase "from two years old (G1332, dietḗs) and under (G2736, kátō)" reveals Herod's meticulous and cruel planning. He had "diligently enquired" (G198, akribóō) from the wise men about the precise "time" (G5550, chrónos) the star had first appeared (G3739, hós). This detail underscores his cunning and determination to eliminate any potential rival, even if it meant the massacre of innocent children, based on his precise estimation of the infant Messiah's age.
Literary Devices
Matthew 2:16 employs several potent literary devices to convey its profound message. The most prominent is Dramatic Irony, as Herod's meticulous plan to destroy the "King of the Jews" is ultimately thwarted by God's prior intervention, having already led Joseph, Mary, and Jesus to safety in Egypt Matthew 2:13. Herod's perceived triumph is, in reality, a futile act against divine will. The "Slaughter of the Innocents" itself serves as powerful Symbolism, representing the clash between the forces of evil (Herod's tyrannical power) and the innocent purity of God's redemptive plan. The extreme nature of Herod's "exceeding wroth" can be seen as Hyperbole in its emotional intensity, emphasizing the unchecked, destructive nature of human sin and paranoia when confronted by divine truth. Furthermore, this horrific event functions as Foreshadowing, hinting at the intense opposition and suffering that Jesus would face throughout His life and ministry, culminating in His crucifixion, yet ultimately leading to His triumph over evil.
Theological and Thematic Connections
The "Slaughter of the Innocents" in Matthew 2:16 is a stark reminder of the profound conflict between the kingdom of God and the kingdoms of this world. Herod's desperate act of infanticide, driven by fear and a lust for power, illustrates the depth of human depravity and the violent resistance that God's redemptive plan often provokes. Theologically, it underscores that the arrival of the Messiah, the true King, would not be met with universal welcome but with fierce opposition from those whose earthly authority felt threatened. Yet, amidst this horrific tragedy, the narrative subtly reinforces God's sovereign control. Even as human wickedness reaches its nadir, God's purposes cannot be thwarted, and His protection over His Son is absolute, demonstrating that His plan unfolds precisely as foretold, even through the darkest of human actions.
Reflection and Application
Matthew 2:16, though a difficult passage, offers profound lessons for reflection and application in the life of a believer. It serves as a sobering reminder that evil is a tangible, destructive force in the world, often targeting the most vulnerable. Herod's paranoia and unchecked power illustrate the devastating consequences when human authority is wielded without moral restraint or submission to God. For us, this passage calls for a heightened awareness of spiritual opposition; just as Christ faced hostility from birth, so too may His followers encounter resistance when seeking to live out God's will. Yet, it also powerfully affirms God's unwavering sovereignty and protective care. Even in the face of unimaginable suffering and injustice, God's ultimate plan cannot be thwarted. We are called to trust in His providence, to value and protect all human life, and to stand against the forces of injustice and oppression, knowing that God is ultimately in control and will bring about His righteous kingdom.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
How many children were killed in the Slaughter of the Innocents?
The Bible does not provide a specific number of children killed in Bethlehem. Matthew's account simply states "all the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from two years old and under." Bethlehem was a relatively small town in the first century. While some historical estimates, particularly from later traditions, have ranged into the thousands, modern scholars generally suggest that the actual number of male children under two years old in Bethlehem and its immediate vicinity would have been much smaller, likely in the dozens. The theological significance of the event lies not in the precise number, but in the horrific nature of Herod's act, the fulfillment of prophecy, and the demonstration of the world's early opposition to Christ.
Why did God allow such a horrific event to happen?
This is a profound theological question that touches upon the problem of evil. The Bible teaches that God is sovereign, but He also allows human beings to exercise their free will, which can lead to acts of great wickedness, as seen in Herod's case. While the suffering of the innocent is deeply distressing, the narrative in Matthew 2 emphasizes God's overarching control and purpose. Even amidst this tragedy, God's plan for the Messiah's safety was already in motion Matthew 2:13, and the event itself fulfilled prophecy Matthew 2:17-18. The allowance of such evil highlights the reality of sin in a fallen world and underscores the desperate need for a Savior, whose ultimate victory over sin and death would bring true justice and redemption.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The "Slaughter of the Innocents" in Matthew 2:16, though a dark chapter, finds its profound Christ-centered fulfillment in several ways. Herod's desperate attempt to destroy the infant King foreshadows the world's persistent rejection and hostility towards Jesus throughout His earthly ministry, culminating in His crucifixion. The innocent children of Bethlehem, tragically sacrificed, become a poignant prefigurement of the ultimate innocent Lamb of God, Jesus Christ, who would truly "take away the sin of the world" John 1:29. His escape to Egypt, divinely orchestrated, echoes Israel's exodus, but Jesus is the true and greater Israel, the Son called "out of Egypt" Matthew 2:15, fulfilling Hosea 11:1, who would lead His people out of the bondage of sin and death. Ultimately, Herod's futile rage against the Christ child underscores the impotence of worldly power against God's eternal plan. The resurrection of Jesus is the definitive triumph over all the forces of darkness and death, including the spirit of tyranny and murder embodied by Herod, demonstrating that no earthly power can thwart the purposes of the true King, who has "destroyed him who has the power of death, that is, the devil" Hebrews 2:14-15. The conflict initiated in Bethlehem finds its resolution in Christ's ultimate victory.