コンテンツへスキップ

1 Samuel 18:26

“Saul Sets a Trap with Marriage”· 1 Samuel 18:17–30Read in context
King James Version
And when his servants told David these words, it pleased David well to be the king's son in law: and the days were not expired.
KJV (with Strong's)
And when his servants H5650 told H5046 David H1732 these words H1697, it pleased H3474 H1697 H5869 David H1732 well to be the king's H4428 son in law H2859: and the days H3117 were not expired H4390.
Complete Jewish Bible
When his servants said these words to David, it pleased David to become the king's son-in-law. Even before the time [for him to be married],
Berean Standard Bible
When the servants reported these terms to David, he was pleased to become the king’s son-in-law. Before the wedding day arrived,
American Standard Version
And when his servants told David these words, it pleased David well to be the king’s son-in-law. And the days were not expired;
World English Bible Messianic
When his servants told David these words, it pleased David well to be the king’s son-in-law. The days were not expired;
Geneva Bible (1599)
And when his seruantes tolde Dauid these wordes, it pleased Dauid well, to be the Kings sonne in law: and the dayes were not expired.
Young's Literal Translation
And his servants declare to David these words, and the thing is right in the eyes of David, to be son-in-law to the king; and the days have not been full,
日本語 · 口語訳
サウルの家来たちが、この言葉をダビデに告げた時、ダビデは王のむこになることを良しとした。そして定めた日がまだこないうちに、
Translation
In the KJVVerse 7,703 of 31,102 · 24.8%

Study this verse

Summary

This verse encapsulates David's sincere and humble acceptance of King Saul's deceptive offer to become his son-in-law, an offer maliciously designed to lead to David's death at the hands of the Philistines. Unbeknownst to David, his prompt and successful fulfillment of the king's perilous demand not only thwarted Saul's wicked intentions but also providentially solidified David's position within the royal household, moving him closer to his divinely appointed destiny as king.

Context

Literary Context

1 Samuel 18:26 is situated within a critical narrative arc in 1 Samuel that details the escalating animosity between King Saul and David. Following David's heroic defeat of Goliath in 1 Samuel 17, David's soaring popularity ignited intense jealousy and paranoia in Saul. This chapter chronicles Saul's increasingly desperate and malevolent attempts to eliminate David. Initially, Saul resorted to direct violence, attempting to spear David (1 Samuel 18:10-11), and then indirectly by sending him into dangerous battles against the Philistines, hoping he would fall in combat (1 Samuel 18:17). When these methods failed, Saul conceived a more insidious plot: offering his younger daughter Michal's hand in marriage, not out of genuine honor, but as a calculated scheme requiring a "dowry" of one hundred Philistine foreskins (1 Samuel 18:25). Saul's true intent was for David to perish in this seemingly impossible and deadly mission. This specific verse captures David's unsuspecting, yet eager and humble, embrace of this treacherous proposal.

Historical & Cultural Context

In ancient Israel, a royal marriage was far more than a personal union; it was a significant political and social alliance. Becoming the king's son-in-law (חָתָן, chathan) conferred immense status, potentially linking one to the royal succession or at least solidifying one's position within the kingdom's elite. The custom of a "dowry" (מוֹהַר, mohar) was prevalent, typically involving a payment or service from the groom to the bride's father, demonstrating the groom's ability to provide and his worthiness. However, Saul's demand for one hundred Philistine foreskins was an unprecedented and culturally provocative requirement. It deviated drastically from traditional dowries, transforming a customary practice into a grotesque and dangerous task. The Philistines were Israel's perennial and formidable enemies, and engaging them in such a manner was fraught with peril. This demand was clearly a thinly veiled assassination attempt, cloaked under the guise of an honorable marriage proposal, highlighting Saul's desperate and manipulative nature.

Key Themes

This verse profoundly contributes to several overarching themes woven throughout 1 Samuel. Firstly, it powerfully underscores the destructive nature of Saul's unchecked jealousy and paranoia, revealing the depths of his malice and his willingness to exploit his own daughter in a murderous scheme against David. Secondly, it highlights David's unwavering humility, courage, and loyalty. Despite his burgeoning fame and the prior attempts on his life, David remained deferential to Saul, genuinely viewing the prospect of becoming the king's son-in-law as a great honor, and readily undertook the perilous task without suspicion. His earlier response in 1 Samuel 18:23 exemplifies his profound sense of unworthiness for such a high position. Most importantly, the verse implicitly reveals God's sovereign providence at work. What Saul intended for evil, God masterfully orchestrated for good, using Saul's malicious plot to further elevate David, connect him by marriage to the royal line, and demonstrate divine favor upon him, ultimately paving the way for his anointing as king in 1 Samuel 16:13. David's swift and successful completion of the task, even exceeding the demand by bringing two hundred foreskins (1 Samuel 18:27), served as undeniable proof of God's protective hand and His active involvement in David's destiny.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Pleased yâshar' H3474

The Hebrew verb יָשַׁר (yâshar), derived from a root meaning "to be straight or even," often translates as "to be right," "to be pleasant," or "to seem good." In this context, it conveys David's genuine satisfaction and approval of the proposal. It indicates that the idea of becoming the king's son-in-law was not merely acceptable but truly agreeable, honorable, and fitting in David's eyes. This stands in stark contrast to Saul's crooked and malicious intentions, highlighting David's integrity and unsuspecting nature.

Son in law châthan' H2859

The term חָתָן (châthan) is a primitive root meaning "to give (a daughter) away in marriage" or "to contract affinity by marriage." It refers specifically to a son-in-law or a bridegroom. In a royal context, this familial bond was deeply significant, implying a close connection to the king's household and potentially a claim or association with the throne. For David, a humble shepherd, this was an extraordinary elevation in status, which he received with humility and honor, rather than presuming any claim to power.

Expired mâlêʼ' H4390

The verb מָלֵא (mâlêʼ), meaning "to fill," "to be full of," or "to be at an end" or "to be expired," indicates in this context that the allotted time for David to fulfill the dowry condition had not yet run out. This phrase emphasizes David's remarkable efficiency, zeal, and promptness in accomplishing the dangerous task, demonstrating his immediate and decisive action, which further frustrated Saul's murderous designs and underscored God's enabling hand.

Verse Breakdown

"And when his servants told David these words"

This clause signifies the formal communication of King Saul's specific and highly unusual dowry demand—one hundred Philistine foreskins—to David. It underscores the official nature of the king's message and David's reception of the terms of this peculiar marriage proposal.

"it pleased David well to be the king's son in law"

This phrase reveals David's internal reaction to the proposal. Far from suspecting a trap or discerning Saul's malicious intent, David genuinely found the prospect of marrying Michal and entering the royal family honorable and desirable. His response reflects his humility, respect for the king, and his perception of the offer as a significant elevation in status and a mark of royal favor, rather than a dangerous ploy.

"and the days were not expired"

This concluding clause highlights David's swift and decisive action in fulfilling the king's demand. It means that David had already successfully completed the perilous mission before the deadline set by Saul for the dowry's delivery. This detail not only showcases David's extraordinary courage, military prowess, and unwavering commitment but also implicitly points to God's enabling hand, allowing David to accomplish the seemingly impossible task with remarkable speed and success, thereby thwarting Saul's sinister plot.

Literary Devices

The passage masterfully employs several literary devices that deepen its meaning and impact. Irony is profoundly evident, as Saul's cunning plan to eliminate David through a dangerous dowry inadvertently serves to elevate David's status, solidify his connection to the royal family, and further demonstrate God's favor upon him. What was intended for destruction becomes an instrument of divine promotion. There is also a stark contrast between Saul's hidden malice and David's genuine pleasure, unsuspecting humility, and prompt obedience, highlighting the profound moral and spiritual chasm between the two men. Furthermore, the narrative uses foreshadowing, as David's successful completion of the task and his subsequent marriage to Michal, a king's daughter, subtly hint at his future role as king, demonstrating God's hand in preparing him for the throne despite human opposition.

Theological and Thematic Connections

This verse, while seemingly simple in its declaration, is a profound testament to God's unwavering sovereignty over human schemes. Saul's deep-seated malice and calculated deception were ultimately no match for the divine plan for David. What Saul intended as a death trap, God sovereignly transformed into a stepping stone for David's ascent to the throne, demonstrating unequivocally that no human plot, however clever or wicked, can thwart the Lord's immutable purposes. This narrative powerfully illustrates that God actively works in and through the complexities of human relationships and political intrigue, often using the evil intentions of one person to accomplish His good will for another. David's humility and trust, contrasted with Saul's fear and jealousy, underscore the spiritual battle at play and God's unwavering faithfulness to His chosen one, even amidst the most perilous circumstances.

Reflection and Application

The account of David and Saul's escalating conflict, culminating in Saul's deceptive marriage offer, provides profound and enduring insights for believers today. It serves as a powerful reminder that even when we are unaware of the dangers or malicious intentions lurking in the hearts of others, God's protective hand remains steadfast and sovereign. David walked unknowingly into a trap, yet God not only preserved him but masterfully used the very mechanism of the trap to further His divine purposes. This should instill in us a deep and abiding trust in God's sovereign care, knowing that He can turn even the most sinister human plots into opportunities for His glory and our ultimate good. David's humility in accepting the king's offer, despite his already proven valor, and his immediate, courageous obedience to a dangerous command, serve as a compelling model for our own walk of faith. We are called to live with integrity, humility, and prompt obedience, trusting that God will navigate us through life's perils and use every circumstance, whether seemingly good or bad, to shape us into Christlikeness and advance His kingdom. Our ultimate security lies not in our ability to avoid all danger, but in resting in the unfailing wisdom, power, and faithfulness of God.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How does David's unsuspecting acceptance of Saul's offer challenge your own tendency to be suspicious or cynical in difficult situations?
  2. In what ways have you personally witnessed God turn what was intended for harm into something good in your own life or in the lives of those you know?
  3. How can David's humility and prompt obedience, even in a risky situation, inspire your response to challenging circumstances or difficult authorities today?
  4. What does this passage teach you about the futility of human schemes when they are set against God's sovereign plan?

FAQ

Why did Saul offer Michal to David if he wanted to kill him?

Saul's offer of his daughter Michal was a deceptive and malicious tactic born out of his intense jealousy and fear of David. He had previously attempted to kill David directly with a spear (1 Samuel 18:10-11) and by sending him into battle hoping he would be killed by the Philistines (1 Samuel 18:17). When these direct and indirect methods failed, he devised a more cunning and insidious plot. He offered Michal's hand in marriage, but demanded an extraordinary and gruesome "dowry" of one hundred Philistine foreskins (1 Samuel 18:25). Saul's true intention was that David would perish in the dangerous mission of fighting the Philistines to obtain such a challenging and provocative dowry, thereby eliminating his rival without directly implicating himself in David's death.

What was the significance of the "dowry" of Philistine foreskins?

In ancient Israelite culture, a dowry (מוֹהַר, mohar) was typically a payment or gift from the groom to the bride's father, often in silver, livestock, or service, signifying the groom's ability to provide for his wife and his worthiness. However, Saul's demand for one hundred Philistine foreskins was highly unusual, culturally provocative, and deeply sinister. It was not a traditional dowry but a grotesque and dangerous task designed to be a death sentence. The Philistines were uncircumcised and bitter, formidable enemies of Israel. The demand was meant to force David into a perilous confrontation where Saul fully expected him to be killed, thus removing the perceived threat David posed to his throne. David's remarkable success in bringing two hundred foreskins (1 Samuel 18:27) not only fulfilled the demand but also highlighted his extraordinary military prowess and, more importantly, God's protective hand over him, turning Saul's evil plan into David's further exaltation.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

The narrative of David's elevation despite Saul's relentless malice powerfully foreshadows the ultimate story of Christ, the true Son of David. Just as David, God's anointed one, faced relentless opposition and schemes intended for his destruction, yet God sovereignly used these very trials to establish him in his earthly kingdom, so too did Jesus, the ultimate King, come into a world hostile to God's rule. He faced the malicious plots of religious and political leaders who sought His death, believing they could thwart God's redemptive plan. Yet, their ultimate act of malice—the crucifixion—was precisely the means by which God accomplished humanity's salvation, turning a death trap into the path to eternal life and victory over sin and death (Colossians 2:14-15). Just as David's "dowry" of Philistine foreskins demonstrated his victory over Israel's enemies and secured his marriage to the king's daughter, Christ's sacrificial death on the cross served as the ultimate "dowry," securing His bride, the Church, through His triumph over sin and death, thereby cleansing and sanctifying her for Himself (Ephesians 5:25-27). What human evil intended for destruction, God used for the greatest good, ultimately exalting Christ to the highest place, where He reigns forever as King of kings and Lord of lords (Philippians 2:9-11). David's story is a profound type, pointing to the greater reality of God's unwavering faithfulness to His Messiah, who, through suffering and death, secured an eternal kingdom and an everlasting covenant with His people.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Samuel 18:12–30. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 19 verses
Passage under comment1 Samuel 18:12–30
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Saul had now, in effect, proclaimed war with David. He began in open hostility when he threw the javelin at him. Now we are here told how his enmity proceeded, and how David received the attacks of it.

I.See how Saul expressed his malice against David.

1.He was afraid of him, Sa1 18:12. Perhaps he pretended to be afraid that David would do himself mischief, to force his way to the crown. Those that design ill against others are commonly willing to have it thought that others design ill against them. But David's withdrawal (Sa1 18:11) was a plain evidence that he was far from such a thought. However, he really stood in awe of him, as Herod feared John, Mar 6:20. Saul was sensible that he had lost the favourable presence of God himself, and that David had it, and for this reason he feared him. Note, Those are truly great and to be reverenced that have God with them. The more wisely David behaved himself the more Saul feared him, Sa1 18:15, and again Sa1 18:29. Men think the way to be feared is to hector and threaten, which makes them feared by fools only, but despised by the wise and good; whereas the way to be both feared and loved, feared by those to whom we would wish to be a terror and loved by those to whom we would wish to be a delight, is to behave ourselves wisely. Wisdom makes the face to shine and commands respect.

2.He removed him from court, and gave him a regiment in the country, Sa1 18:13. He made him captain over 1000, that he might be from under his eye, because he hated the sight of him; and that he might not secure the interest of the courtiers. Yet herein he did impolitely; for it gave David an opportunity of ingratiating himself with the people, who therefore loved him (Sa1 18:16) because he went out and came in before them, that is, he presided in the business of his country, civil as well as military, and have universal satisfaction.

3.He stirred him up to take all occasions of quarrelling with the Philistines and engaging them (Sa1 18:17), insinuating to him that hereby he would do good service to his prince (be thou valiant for me), and good service to his God (fight the Lord's battles), and a kindness to himself too, for hereby he would qualify himself for the honour he designed him, which was to marry his eldest daughter to him. This he had merited by killing Goliath, for it was promised by proclamation to him that should do that exploit (Sa1 17:25); but David was so modest as not to demand it, and now, when Saul proposed it, it was with design of mischief to him, to make him venture upon hazardous attempts, saying in his heart, Let the hand of the Philistines be upon him, hoping that he would some time or other be the death of him; yet how could he expect this when he saw that God was with him?

4.He did what he could to provoke him to discontent and mutiny, by breaking his promise with him, and giving his daughter to another when the time came that she should have been given to him, Sa1 18:19. This was as great an affront as he could possibly put upon him, and touched him both in his honour and in his love. He therefore thought David's resentment of it would break out in some indecency or other, in word or deed, which might give him an advantage against him to take him off by the course of law. Thus evil men seek mischief.

5.When he was disappointed in his, he proffered him his other daughter (who it seems had a secret kindness for David, Sa1 18:20), but with this design, that she might be a snare to him, Sa1 18:21.

(1.)Perhaps he hoped that she would, even after her marriage to David, take part with her father against her husband, and give him an opportunity of doing David an unkindness. However,

(2.)The conditions of the marriage, he hoped, would be his destruction; for (so zealous will Saul seem against the Philistines) the conditions of the marriage must be that he killed 100 Philistines, and, as proofs that those he had slain were uncircumcised, he must bring in their foreskins cut off; this would be a just reproach upon the Philistines, who hated circumcision as it was an ordinance of God; and perhaps David, in doing this, would the more exasperate them against him, and make them seek to be revenged on him, which was the thing that Saul desired and designed, much more than to be avenged on the Philistines: For Saul thought to make David fall by the Philistines, Sa1 18:25. See here,

[1.]What cheats bad men put upon themselves. Saul's conscience would not suffer him, except when the evil spirit was actually upon him, to aim at David's life himself, for even he could not but conceive a horror at the thought of murdering such an innocent and excellent person; but he thought that to expose him designedly to the Philistines had nothing bad in it (Let not my hand be upon him, but the hand of the Philistines), whereas that malicious design against him was as truly murder before God as if he had slain him with his own hands.

[2.]What cheats they put upon the world. Saul pretended extraordinary kindness for David even when he aimed at his ruin, and was actually plotting it: Thou shalt be my son-in-law, says he (Sa1 18:21), notwithstanding he hated him implacably. Perhaps David refers to this when (Psa 55:21) he speaks of his enemy as one whose words were smoother than butter, but war was in his heart. It is probable that Saul's employing his servants to persuade David to enter into a treaty of a match with his daughter Michal (Sa1 18:22) arose from an apprehension that either his having cheated him about his elder daughter (Sa1 18:19) or the hardness of the terms he intended now to propose would make him decline it.

II.See how David conducted himself when the tide of Saul's displeasure ran thus high against him.

1.He behaved himself wisely in all his ways. He perceived Saul's jealousy of him, which made him very cautious and circumspect in every thing he said and did, and careful to give no offence. He did not complain of hard measure more make himself the head of a party, but managed all the affairs he was entrusted with as one that made it his business to do real service to his king and country, looking upon that to be the end of his preferment. And then the Lord was with him to give him success in all his undertakings. Though he procured Saul's ill-will by it, yet he obtained God's favour. Compare this with Psa 101:2, where it is David's promise, I will behave myself wisely; and that promise he here performed; and it is his prayer, O, when wilt thou come unto me? And that prayer God here answered: The Lord was with him. However blind fortune may seem to favour fools, God will own and bless those that behave themselves wisely.

2.When it was proposed to him to be son-in-law to the king he once and again received the proposal with all possible modesty and humility. When Saul proposed his elder daughter to him (Sa1 18:18) he said, Who am I, and what is my life? When the courtier proposed the younger, he took no notice of the affront Saul had put upon him in disposing of the elder from him, but continued in the same mind (Sa1 18:23): Seemeth it a light thing to you to be a king's son-in-law, seeing that I am a poor man and lightly esteemed? He knew Michal loved him, and yet did not offer to improve his interest in her affections for the gaining of her without her father's consent, but waited till it was proposed to him. And then see,

(1.)How highly he speaks of the honour offered him: To be son-in-law to the king. Though his king was but an upstart, in his original as mean as himself, in his management no better than he should be, yet, being a crowned head, he speaks of him and the royal family with all due respect. Note, Religion is so far from teaching us to be rude and unmannerly that it does not allow us to be so. We must render honour to whom honour is due.

(2.)How humbly he speaks of himself: Who am I? This did not proceed from a mean, abject, sneaking spirit, for when there was occasion he made it appear that he had as high a sense of honour as most men; nor was it from his jealousy of Saul (though he had reason enough to fear a snake under the green grass), but from him true and deep humility: Who am I, a poor man, and lightly esteemed? David had as much reason as any man to value himself. He was of an ancient and honourable family of Judah, a comely person, a great statesman and soldier; his achievements were great, for he had won Goliath's head and Michal's heart. He knew himself destined by the divine counsels to the throne of Israel, and yet, Whom am I, and what is my life? Note, It well becomes us, however God has advanced us, always to have low thoughts of ourselves. He that humbleth himself shall be exalted. And, if David thus magnified the honour of being son-in-law to the king, how should we magnify the honour of being sons (not in law, but in gospel) to the King of kings! Behold what manner of love the Father has bestowed upon us! Who are we that we should be thus dignified?

3.When the slaying of 100 Philistines was made the condition of David's marrying Saul's daughter he readily closed with it (Sa1 18:26): It pleased David well to be the king's son-in-law upon those terms; and, before the time given him for the action had expired, he doubled the demand, and slew 200, Sa1 18:27. He would not seem to suspect that Saul designed his hurt by it (though he had reason enough), but would rather act as if Saul had meant to consult his honour, and therefore cheerfully undertook it, as became a brave soldier and a true lover, though we may suppose it uneasy to Michal. David hereby discovered likewise,

(1.)A great confidence in the divine protection. He knew God was with him, and therefore, whatever Saul hoped, David did not fear falling by the Philistines, though he must needs expose himself much by such an undertaking as this.

(2.)A great zeal for the good of his country, which he would not decline any occasion of doing service to, though with the hazard of his life.

(3.)A right notion of honour, which consists not so much in being preferred as in deserving to be so. David was then pleased with the thoughts of being the king's son-in-law when he found the honour set at this high price, being more solicitous how to merit it than how to obtain it; nor could he wear it with satisfaction till he had won it.

4.Even after he was married he continued his good services to Israel. When the princes of the Philistines began to move towards another war David was ready to oppose them, and behaved himself more wisely than all the servants of Saul, Sa1 18:30. The law dispensed with men from going to war the first year after they were married (Deu 24:5), but David loved his country too well to make use of that dispensation. Many that have shown themselves forward to serve the public when they have been in pursuit of preferment have declined it when they have gained their point; but David acted from more generous principles.

III.Observe how God brought good to David out of Saul's project against him.

1.Saul gave him his daughter to be a snare to him, but in this respect that marriage was a kindness to him, that his being Saul's son-in-law made his succeeding him much the less invidious, especially when so many of his sons were slain with him, Sa1 31:2.

2.Saul thought, by putting him upon dangerous services, to have him taken off, but that very thing confirmed his interest in the people; for the more he did against the Philistines the better they loved him, so that his name was much set by (Sa1 18:30), which would make his coming to the crown the more easy. Thus God makes even the wrath of man to praise him and serves his designs of kindness to his own people by it.

Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Samuel 18:26 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8