דלג לתוכן

1 Samuel 18:20

“Saul Sets a Trap with Marriage”· 1 Samuel 18:17–30Read in context
King James Version
And Michal Saul's daughter loved David: and they told Saul, and the thing pleased him.
KJV (with Strong's)
And Michal H4324 Saul's H7586 daughter H1323 loved H157 David H1732: and they told H5046 Saul H7586, and the thing H1697 pleased H3474 H5869 him.
Complete Jewish Bible
But Mikhal Sha'ul's daughter fell in love with David. They told Sha'ul, and it pleased him.
Berean Standard Bible
Now Saul’s daughter Michal loved David, and when this was reported to Saul, it pleased him.
American Standard Version
And Michal, Saul’s daughter, loved David: and they told Saul, and the thing pleased him.
World English Bible Messianic
Michal, Saul’s daughter, loved David; and they told Saul, and the thing pleased him.
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then Michal Sauls daughter loued Dauid: and they shewed Saul, and the thing pleased him.
Young's Literal Translation
And Michal daughter of Saul loveth David, and they declare to Saul, and the thing is right in his eyes,
עברית · Modern
ותאהב מיכל בת שאול את דוד ויגדו לשאול וישר הדבר בעיניו׃
Translation
In the KJVVerse 7,697 of 31,102 · 24.7%

Study this verse

Summary

1 Samuel 18:20 marks a critical turning point in the escalating tension between King Saul and David, revealing Michal, Saul's daughter, developing a deep and genuine affection for David. This affection, however, is immediately seized upon by Saul not as a source of paternal joy, but as a cunning strategic opportunity to ensnare and eliminate David, thereby starkly highlighting the profound contrast between Michal's pure intentions and Saul's deepening paranoia, manipulative schemes, and spiritual decline.

Context

Literary Context

This verse is strategically positioned within a rapidly unfolding narrative that chronicles David's meteoric rise to prominence and King Saul's parallel descent into jealousy and madness. Following David's iconic victory over Goliath in 1 Samuel 17, his subsequent military successes and overwhelming popularity among the Israelite populace, particularly the women who sang his praises (1 Samuel 18:7), ignited a fierce, consuming jealousy in Saul. Prior to this verse, Saul had already made several direct attempts on David's life, including hurling a spear at him (1 Samuel 18:10-11). His fear of David's rising influence was palpable, intensified by his recognition that the Lord was powerfully with David, a stark contrast to the Spirit of the Lord having departed from himself (1 Samuel 18:12). Saul had previously offered his elder daughter, Merab, to David, only to renege on the promise and give her to Adriel the Meholathite (1 Samuel 18:17-19). It is precisely within this atmosphere of political intrigue, personal animosity, and divine orchestration that Michal's unexpected love for David emerges, providing Saul with what he perceives as a new, more insidious means to achieve David's demise.

Historical & Cultural Context

The early Israelite monarchy, as vividly portrayed in 1 Samuel, was a period of nascent political structures and ongoing consolidation. In this era, marriages, especially those involving the royal family, were rarely mere personal unions; they were significant political instruments. A king's daughter could be strategically given in marriage to secure loyalty, forge alliances, or, as tragically demonstrated by Saul, to set a trap for an enemy. The custom of a "bride-price" (mohar) was deeply ingrained, often involving a dowry paid by the groom or a service rendered to the bride's father to validate the marriage covenant. Saul's subsequent demand for a bride-price of one hundred Philistine foreskins (1 Samuel 18:25) was a grotesque and unprecedented perversion of this custom, meticulously designed to ensure David's death at the hands of Israel's formidable and perennial enemies, the Philistines. This historical and cultural backdrop profoundly underscores the high stakes involved in royal marriages and illuminates the ruthless, often Machiavellian, nature of power struggles prevalent in ancient Near Eastern monarchies.

Key Themes

This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes woven throughout the book of 1 Samuel. Firstly, it sharply highlights the contrast between genuine affection and manipulative self-interest. Michal's love for David is portrayed as sincere and unbidden, standing in stark opposition to her father's calculating and malevolent intentions. This dichotomy underscores the moral and spiritual chasm between the characters. Secondly, it deepens the theme of Saul's escalating paranoia and spiritual decline. His "pleasure" in Michal's love is not rooted in paternal care or joy for his daughter's happiness, but in a sinister opportunity to rid himself of David, revealing how far he has fallen from God's favor and how deeply consumed he is by envy. Thirdly, the verse reinforces the pervasive theme of divine sovereignty overriding human schemes. Despite Saul's wicked designs and desperate attempts to thwart God's plan, the narrative consistently demonstrates that God continually works through these very events, even the king's malicious plots, to elevate David and establish his kingship. This powerfully illustrates that God's ultimate purposes cannot be thwarted by human evil, a truth echoed throughout the entire book of 1 Samuel.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

loved ʼâhab' H157

The Hebrew verb אָהֵב (ʼâhab) denotes a deep, genuine affection or a strong, often passionate, attachment. It is a foundational term in the Old Testament, used to describe God's covenantal love for Israel (Deuteronomy 7:8), a husband's love for his wife (Genesis 29:30), and the love between friends. Its application here to Michal emphasizes the authenticity and sincerity of her feelings for David, establishing a pure emotional connection that stands in stark contrast to the insincere and manipulative nature of her father's subsequent actions. This genuine emotion sets her apart from the political machinations and calculated relationships prevalent in the royal court.

pleased yâshar' H3474

The Hebrew verb יָשַׁר (yâshar) literally means "to be straight or even," and figuratively, "to be right, pleasant, or prosperous." While often conveying a positive sense of approval or agreement, its usage in 1 Samuel 18:20 is imbued with profound irony and a sinister undertone. Saul's "pleasure" is not born of joy for his daughter's happiness or admiration for David's character. Instead, it signifies a twisted, self-serving satisfaction derived from the perceived strategic advantage this development offers him. He immediately conceives of a way to exploit Michal's genuine love as a trap, revealing the depths of his malice, desperation, and moral corruption. His "pleasure" is a dark reflection of his inner turmoil and his desperate desire to thwart God's plan for David.

Verse Breakdown

"And Michal Saul's daughter loved David"

This opening clause immediately establishes Michal's personal agency and the authenticity of her emotion. Despite being the daughter of a king who increasingly despises David, Michal develops a sincere and unbidden affection for him. This is a significant detail, as it introduces a genuine human element of love and loyalty into a narrative otherwise dominated by political maneuvering, intense jealousy, and divine appointment. Her love is presented as an uncalculated, authentic feeling, setting her apart from the court's machinations.

"and they told Saul"

The passive construction "they told" suggests that the news of Michal's affection was not a secret, or perhaps it was intentionally brought to Saul's attention by those observing the situation within the royal household. This implies a level of public knowledge or court gossip, indicating David's growing stature and the unavoidable nature of his presence and influence in the royal court. The news reaching Saul serves as the immediate catalyst for his next, more direct, and insidious attempt to eliminate David.

"and the thing pleased him"

This final clause chillingly reveals the manipulative and malevolent nature of King Saul. His "pleasure" is not a benevolent paternal response to his daughter's happiness or a recognition of David's virtues. Instead, it is a calculating and sinister satisfaction, as he immediately perceives an opportunity to weaponize Michal's genuine affection, transforming it into a trap for David. This "pleasure" is a dark reflection of Saul's deep-seated envy, his spiritual decline, and his desperate desire to thwart God's plan for David, even if it means sacrificing his own daughter's well-being and happiness.

Literary Devices

The verse effectively employs Juxtaposition to highlight the stark contrast between Michal's pure affection and Saul's malevolent intentions. Michal's genuine "loved" stands in direct opposition to Saul's twisted "pleased," immediately signaling the profound moral and spiritual chasm between the two characters. This contrast powerfully underscores the pervasive theme of integrity versus corruption within the narrative. Furthermore, there is a strong element of Irony at play. Saul's attempt to use Michal's love as a means to destroy David ultimately backfires. David survives the ordeal, gaining a deeper connection to the royal family and inadvertently moving him closer to the throne. This divine Foreshadowing suggests that God is sovereignly working through Saul's evil intentions to advance His own purposes for David, setting the stage for future events where Saul's schemes continually fail and David's inevitable ascent to kingship is ensured, demonstrating God's unfailing hand in human affairs.

Theological and Thematic Connections

1 Samuel 18:20 offers a profound theological insight into the intricate interplay of human will and divine sovereignty. Michal's genuine love for David, a pure and unbidden human emotion, stands in stark contrast to Saul's malicious "pleasure," which is rooted in envy, paranoia, and a desperate desire to thwart God's chosen one. Yet, the narrative powerfully demonstrates that even Saul's wicked intentions, manipulative schemes, and desperate attempts are ultimately incapable of derailing God's overarching plan for David's ascension to the throne. God orchestrates circumstances, even allowing for human evil and sin, to bring about His righteous and sovereign purposes. This verse serves as a powerful reminder that while human beings possess agency and their actions carry significant moral weight, God remains supremely sovereign over all, weaving even the threads of sin, manipulation, and opposition into the grand tapestry of His redemptive design, ensuring His ultimate will prevails.

Reflection and Application

This verse challenges us to deeply examine the intentions behind our own actions and the nature of our relationships. Michal's love, though caught in a dangerous political game, was sincere and selfless. Saul's "pleasure," however, was a sinister mask for his murderous intent, rooted in self-preservation and envy. We are called as believers to cultivate genuine, selfless love in our interactions, viewing others as image-bearers of God rather than as means to an end or opportunities for personal gain. When we inevitably encounter situations where others' motives are questionable, manipulative, or even malicious, this passage encourages us to trust implicitly in God's overarching sovereignty. Just as God worked through Saul's evil to advance David's destiny and bring about His divine plan, He can redeem and repurpose even the most difficult or manipulative circumstances in our lives for His glory and our ultimate good. It reminds us that our ultimate security and peace lie not in controlling outcomes or avoiding conflict, but in resting in God's unfailing plan and His perfect wisdom.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How do our underlying intentions (like Michal's love or Saul's malice) profoundly shape our actions and the ultimate outcomes of our relationships?
  2. In what specific ways might God be working through seemingly negative, challenging, or even manipulative situations in our lives, bringing about His purposes despite human evil or opposition?
  3. How can we intentionally cultivate genuine, selfless love in all our relationships, rather than subtly seeking personal gain, control, or manipulation over others?
  4. What profound lessons does this verse teach us about trusting God's unwavering sovereignty, even when faced with significant human opposition, deceit, or injustice?

FAQ

Why was Michal's love for David significant, especially given Saul's reaction?

Michal's love for David was profoundly significant for several reasons. Firstly, it was portrayed as genuine ("loved David"), providing a stark and poignant contrast to the manipulative and self-serving nature of her father, Saul. In a royal court often filled with political intrigue and fear, her unbidden affection stands out as a pure human emotion. Secondly, this genuine love became a crucial, albeit unintentional, catalyst for Saul's next insidious plot against David. Saul immediately perceived Michal's affection as a strategic opportunity to ensnare David, planning to use the customary bride-price as a means to send David to his death at the hands of the Philistines (1 Samuel 18:21). Thus, Michal's love, though pure in its origin, inadvertently played a pivotal role in advancing David's destiny by prompting Saul's scheme, which ultimately failed and further elevated David in the eyes of the people and within the royal family.

What does the phrase "and the thing pleased him" reveal about King Saul's character at this point in the narrative?

This phrase is profoundly revealing of Saul's rapidly deteriorating character and spiritual state. It signifies a twisted, malevolent satisfaction, not a benevolent paternal joy or a genuine concern for his daughter's happiness. Saul's "pleasure" was deeply rooted in his intense jealousy, paranoia, and fear concerning David's rising popularity and undeniable divine favor. He harbored no genuine care for Michal's well-being or David's virtue; instead, he saw her love as a strategic weakness to exploit. This reveals Saul as increasingly manipulative, devoid of genuine affection, and utterly consumed by a desperate desire to eliminate David, whom he perceived as an existential threat to his throne. It underscores his profound spiritual decline and his willingness to use even his own daughter as a pawn in his increasingly futile and desperate attempts to thwart God's sovereign plan.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

The narrative of 1 Samuel 18:20, with its intricate dance between genuine love, human malice, and divine sovereignty, finds its most profound Christ-centered fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. Saul's desperate, manipulative attempts to thwart David's anointing and ultimate kingship, even through schemes involving his own daughter, powerfully foreshadow the world's opposition to God's ultimate and eternal King, Jesus Christ. Just as Saul sought to destroy David, humanity, in its fallen state and spiritual blindness, rejected and ultimately crucified the Messiah (Acts 2:23). Yet, in a divine irony far grander and more redemptive than any found in 1 Samuel, God used the very act of the crucifixion—the ultimate human act of malice, rejection, and apparent defeat—as the preordained means to accomplish His glorious redemptive plan for all humanity (Colossians 2:15). Christ's path to His eternal throne was not through political maneuvering, human power, or the manipulation of others, but through humble obedience, profound suffering, and ultimate self-sacrifice (Philippians 2:8-11). Thus, Michal's genuine love, tragically caught in a web of deceit, and Saul's futile attempts to control destiny, both powerfully point to the greater, overarching truth that God's plan for His anointed King, Jesus, cannot be thwarted by any human design, demonic power, or worldly opposition, but is perfectly fulfilled through His sovereign and unshakeable will.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Samuel 18:12–30. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 19 verses
Passage under comment1 Samuel 18:12–30
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Saul had now, in effect, proclaimed war with David. He began in open hostility when he threw the javelin at him. Now we are here told how his enmity proceeded, and how David received the attacks of it.

I.See how Saul expressed his malice against David.

1.He was afraid of him, Sa1 18:12. Perhaps he pretended to be afraid that David would do himself mischief, to force his way to the crown. Those that design ill against others are commonly willing to have it thought that others design ill against them. But David's withdrawal (Sa1 18:11) was a plain evidence that he was far from such a thought. However, he really stood in awe of him, as Herod feared John, Mar 6:20. Saul was sensible that he had lost the favourable presence of God himself, and that David had it, and for this reason he feared him. Note, Those are truly great and to be reverenced that have God with them. The more wisely David behaved himself the more Saul feared him, Sa1 18:15, and again Sa1 18:29. Men think the way to be feared is to hector and threaten, which makes them feared by fools only, but despised by the wise and good; whereas the way to be both feared and loved, feared by those to whom we would wish to be a terror and loved by those to whom we would wish to be a delight, is to behave ourselves wisely. Wisdom makes the face to shine and commands respect.

2.He removed him from court, and gave him a regiment in the country, Sa1 18:13. He made him captain over 1000, that he might be from under his eye, because he hated the sight of him; and that he might not secure the interest of the courtiers. Yet herein he did impolitely; for it gave David an opportunity of ingratiating himself with the people, who therefore loved him (Sa1 18:16) because he went out and came in before them, that is, he presided in the business of his country, civil as well as military, and have universal satisfaction.

3.He stirred him up to take all occasions of quarrelling with the Philistines and engaging them (Sa1 18:17), insinuating to him that hereby he would do good service to his prince (be thou valiant for me), and good service to his God (fight the Lord's battles), and a kindness to himself too, for hereby he would qualify himself for the honour he designed him, which was to marry his eldest daughter to him. This he had merited by killing Goliath, for it was promised by proclamation to him that should do that exploit (Sa1 17:25); but David was so modest as not to demand it, and now, when Saul proposed it, it was with design of mischief to him, to make him venture upon hazardous attempts, saying in his heart, Let the hand of the Philistines be upon him, hoping that he would some time or other be the death of him; yet how could he expect this when he saw that God was with him?

4.He did what he could to provoke him to discontent and mutiny, by breaking his promise with him, and giving his daughter to another when the time came that she should have been given to him, Sa1 18:19. This was as great an affront as he could possibly put upon him, and touched him both in his honour and in his love. He therefore thought David's resentment of it would break out in some indecency or other, in word or deed, which might give him an advantage against him to take him off by the course of law. Thus evil men seek mischief.

5.When he was disappointed in his, he proffered him his other daughter (who it seems had a secret kindness for David, Sa1 18:20), but with this design, that she might be a snare to him, Sa1 18:21.

(1.)Perhaps he hoped that she would, even after her marriage to David, take part with her father against her husband, and give him an opportunity of doing David an unkindness. However,

(2.)The conditions of the marriage, he hoped, would be his destruction; for (so zealous will Saul seem against the Philistines) the conditions of the marriage must be that he killed 100 Philistines, and, as proofs that those he had slain were uncircumcised, he must bring in their foreskins cut off; this would be a just reproach upon the Philistines, who hated circumcision as it was an ordinance of God; and perhaps David, in doing this, would the more exasperate them against him, and make them seek to be revenged on him, which was the thing that Saul desired and designed, much more than to be avenged on the Philistines: For Saul thought to make David fall by the Philistines, Sa1 18:25. See here,

[1.]What cheats bad men put upon themselves. Saul's conscience would not suffer him, except when the evil spirit was actually upon him, to aim at David's life himself, for even he could not but conceive a horror at the thought of murdering such an innocent and excellent person; but he thought that to expose him designedly to the Philistines had nothing bad in it (Let not my hand be upon him, but the hand of the Philistines), whereas that malicious design against him was as truly murder before God as if he had slain him with his own hands.

[2.]What cheats they put upon the world. Saul pretended extraordinary kindness for David even when he aimed at his ruin, and was actually plotting it: Thou shalt be my son-in-law, says he (Sa1 18:21), notwithstanding he hated him implacably. Perhaps David refers to this when (Psa 55:21) he speaks of his enemy as one whose words were smoother than butter, but war was in his heart. It is probable that Saul's employing his servants to persuade David to enter into a treaty of a match with his daughter Michal (Sa1 18:22) arose from an apprehension that either his having cheated him about his elder daughter (Sa1 18:19) or the hardness of the terms he intended now to propose would make him decline it.

II.See how David conducted himself when the tide of Saul's displeasure ran thus high against him.

1.He behaved himself wisely in all his ways. He perceived Saul's jealousy of him, which made him very cautious and circumspect in every thing he said and did, and careful to give no offence. He did not complain of hard measure more make himself the head of a party, but managed all the affairs he was entrusted with as one that made it his business to do real service to his king and country, looking upon that to be the end of his preferment. And then the Lord was with him to give him success in all his undertakings. Though he procured Saul's ill-will by it, yet he obtained God's favour. Compare this with Psa 101:2, where it is David's promise, I will behave myself wisely; and that promise he here performed; and it is his prayer, O, when wilt thou come unto me? And that prayer God here answered: The Lord was with him. However blind fortune may seem to favour fools, God will own and bless those that behave themselves wisely.

2.When it was proposed to him to be son-in-law to the king he once and again received the proposal with all possible modesty and humility. When Saul proposed his elder daughter to him (Sa1 18:18) he said, Who am I, and what is my life? When the courtier proposed the younger, he took no notice of the affront Saul had put upon him in disposing of the elder from him, but continued in the same mind (Sa1 18:23): Seemeth it a light thing to you to be a king's son-in-law, seeing that I am a poor man and lightly esteemed? He knew Michal loved him, and yet did not offer to improve his interest in her affections for the gaining of her without her father's consent, but waited till it was proposed to him. And then see,

(1.)How highly he speaks of the honour offered him: To be son-in-law to the king. Though his king was but an upstart, in his original as mean as himself, in his management no better than he should be, yet, being a crowned head, he speaks of him and the royal family with all due respect. Note, Religion is so far from teaching us to be rude and unmannerly that it does not allow us to be so. We must render honour to whom honour is due.

(2.)How humbly he speaks of himself: Who am I? This did not proceed from a mean, abject, sneaking spirit, for when there was occasion he made it appear that he had as high a sense of honour as most men; nor was it from his jealousy of Saul (though he had reason enough to fear a snake under the green grass), but from him true and deep humility: Who am I, a poor man, and lightly esteemed? David had as much reason as any man to value himself. He was of an ancient and honourable family of Judah, a comely person, a great statesman and soldier; his achievements were great, for he had won Goliath's head and Michal's heart. He knew himself destined by the divine counsels to the throne of Israel, and yet, Whom am I, and what is my life? Note, It well becomes us, however God has advanced us, always to have low thoughts of ourselves. He that humbleth himself shall be exalted. And, if David thus magnified the honour of being son-in-law to the king, how should we magnify the honour of being sons (not in law, but in gospel) to the King of kings! Behold what manner of love the Father has bestowed upon us! Who are we that we should be thus dignified?

3.When the slaying of 100 Philistines was made the condition of David's marrying Saul's daughter he readily closed with it (Sa1 18:26): It pleased David well to be the king's son-in-law upon those terms; and, before the time given him for the action had expired, he doubled the demand, and slew 200, Sa1 18:27. He would not seem to suspect that Saul designed his hurt by it (though he had reason enough), but would rather act as if Saul had meant to consult his honour, and therefore cheerfully undertook it, as became a brave soldier and a true lover, though we may suppose it uneasy to Michal. David hereby discovered likewise,

(1.)A great confidence in the divine protection. He knew God was with him, and therefore, whatever Saul hoped, David did not fear falling by the Philistines, though he must needs expose himself much by such an undertaking as this.

(2.)A great zeal for the good of his country, which he would not decline any occasion of doing service to, though with the hazard of his life.

(3.)A right notion of honour, which consists not so much in being preferred as in deserving to be so. David was then pleased with the thoughts of being the king's son-in-law when he found the honour set at this high price, being more solicitous how to merit it than how to obtain it; nor could he wear it with satisfaction till he had won it.

4.Even after he was married he continued his good services to Israel. When the princes of the Philistines began to move towards another war David was ready to oppose them, and behaved himself more wisely than all the servants of Saul, Sa1 18:30. The law dispensed with men from going to war the first year after they were married (Deu 24:5), but David loved his country too well to make use of that dispensation. Many that have shown themselves forward to serve the public when they have been in pursuit of preferment have declined it when they have gained their point; but David acted from more generous principles.

III.Observe how God brought good to David out of Saul's project against him.

1.Saul gave him his daughter to be a snare to him, but in this respect that marriage was a kindness to him, that his being Saul's son-in-law made his succeeding him much the less invidious, especially when so many of his sons were slain with him, Sa1 31:2.

2.Saul thought, by putting him upon dangerous services, to have him taken off, but that very thing confirmed his interest in the people; for the more he did against the Philistines the better they loved him, so that his name was much set by (Sa1 18:30), which would make his coming to the crown the more easy. Thus God makes even the wrath of man to praise him and serves his designs of kindness to his own people by it.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Three Centuries of Reception

2 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

2 quotes · AD 735–1022
Early Medieval
8009001000

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

AD 735BedeEarly MedievalSourceCommentary on Samuel
And it was reported to Saul, and it pleased him, etc. The envious leaders of the Jews, recognizing that the crowd loved the Lord and flocked with diligent intention to hear Him, which they detested in other matters, began to be pleased in this one part, thinking that they could reprimand Him by frequently teaching in words and catching something from His mouth, so they might accuse Him and deliver Him to the nations to be killed; even thinking that God’s wisdom is subject to that sentence: In the multitude of words, you shall not escape sin (Prov. X). And they said: Let us permit Him to teach, that it may be a stumbling block to Him, and we be innocent of His blood: let the hand of the Romans be upon Him, as we accuse Him of undermining our nation, forbidding tributes to be given to Caesar, and declaring Himself to be Christ.
AD 1022Symeon the New TheologianEarly MedievalSourceDISCOURSES 4.2
Why did Saul seek to apprehend and kill David whom he had formerly honored as himself and greatly loved as a benefactor? Was it by nature or out of an evil will? Obviously it was out of ill will. No one is born evil by nature, since God did not create evil works but things that were very good. Or, rather, he did so since he is good, and that not by disposition and choice but in nature and in truth.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Samuel 18:20 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8