- English
- King James KJV
- Complete Jewish CJB
- World English WEBM
- Berean Standard BSB
- American Standard ASV
- Geneva GNV
- Young's Literal YLT
- Douay-Rheims DRC
- International
- Shqip ALB
- العربية SVD
- বাংলা BN-IRV
- မြန်မာ Judson
- 简体文 CUV-S
- 繁體中文 CUV-T
- Čeština BKR
- Nederlands STVE
- Français LSG
- Deutsch SCH
- Ελληνικά Vamvas
- ગુજરાતી GU-IRV
- Hausa HCB
- עברית Hebrew
- हिन्दी HCV
- Magyar KAROLI
- Bahasa Indonesia INDO-TB
- Italiano Diodati
- 日本語 Kougo
- 한국어 Korean
- മലയാളം MAL
- मराठी MRCV
- Norsk DNB
- فارسی OPV
- Polski BG
- Português Almeida
- Română Cornilescu
- Русский Synodal
- Español RVG
- Kiswahili Neno
- Svenska SV1917
- Tagalog TAG-ADB
- தமிழ் TCV
- తెలుగు TSA
- ภาษาไทย THAI-KJV
- Українська Ohienko
- Tiếng Việt CADMAN
- Yorùbá YCB
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Samuel 18:12–30. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Saul had now, in effect, proclaimed war with David. He began in open hostility when he threw the javelin at him. Now we are here told how his enmity proceeded, and how David received the attacks of it.
I.See how Saul expressed his malice against David.
1.He was afraid of him, Sa1 18:12. Perhaps he pretended to be afraid that David would do himself mischief, to force his way to the crown. Those that design ill against others are commonly willing to have it thought that others design ill against them. But David's withdrawal (Sa1 18:11) was a plain evidence that he was far from such a thought. However, he really stood in awe of him, as Herod feared John, Mar 6:20. Saul was sensible that he had lost the favourable presence of God himself, and that David had it, and for this reason he feared him. Note, Those are truly great and to be reverenced that have God with them. The more wisely David behaved himself the more Saul feared him, Sa1 18:15, and again Sa1 18:29. Men think the way to be feared is to hector and threaten, which makes them feared by fools only, but despised by the wise and good; whereas the way to be both feared and loved, feared by those to whom we would wish to be a terror and loved by those to whom we would wish to be a delight, is to behave ourselves wisely. Wisdom makes the face to shine and commands respect.
2.He removed him from court, and gave him a regiment in the country, Sa1 18:13. He made him captain over 1000, that he might be from under his eye, because he hated the sight of him; and that he might not secure the interest of the courtiers. Yet herein he did impolitely; for it gave David an opportunity of ingratiating himself with the people, who therefore loved him (Sa1 18:16) because he went out and came in before them, that is, he presided in the business of his country, civil as well as military, and have universal satisfaction.
3.He stirred him up to take all occasions of quarrelling with the Philistines and engaging them (Sa1 18:17), insinuating to him that hereby he would do good service to his prince (be thou valiant for me), and good service to his God (fight the Lord's battles), and a kindness to himself too, for hereby he would qualify himself for the honour he designed him, which was to marry his eldest daughter to him. This he had merited by killing Goliath, for it was promised by proclamation to him that should do that exploit (Sa1 17:25); but David was so modest as not to demand it, and now, when Saul proposed it, it was with design of mischief to him, to make him venture upon hazardous attempts, saying in his heart, Let the hand of the Philistines be upon him, hoping that he would some time or other be the death of him; yet how could he expect this when he saw that God was with him?
4.He did what he could to provoke him to discontent and mutiny, by breaking his promise with him, and giving his daughter to another when the time came that she should have been given to him, Sa1 18:19. This was as great an affront as he could possibly put upon him, and touched him both in his honour and in his love. He therefore thought David's resentment of it would break out in some indecency or other, in word or deed, which might give him an advantage against him to take him off by the course of law. Thus evil men seek mischief.
5.When he was disappointed in his, he proffered him his other daughter (who it seems had a secret kindness for David, Sa1 18:20), but with this design, that she might be a snare to him, Sa1 18:21.
(1.)Perhaps he hoped that she would, even after her marriage to David, take part with her father against her husband, and give him an opportunity of doing David an unkindness. However,
(2.)The conditions of the marriage, he hoped, would be his destruction; for (so zealous will Saul seem against the Philistines) the conditions of the marriage must be that he killed 100 Philistines, and, as proofs that those he had slain were uncircumcised, he must bring in their foreskins cut off; this would be a just reproach upon the Philistines, who hated circumcision as it was an ordinance of God; and perhaps David, in doing this, would the more exasperate them against him, and make them seek to be revenged on him, which was the thing that Saul desired and designed, much more than to be avenged on the Philistines: For Saul thought to make David fall by the Philistines, Sa1 18:25. See here,
[1.]What cheats bad men put upon themselves. Saul's conscience would not suffer him, except when the evil spirit was actually upon him, to aim at David's life himself, for even he could not but conceive a horror at the thought of murdering such an innocent and excellent person; but he thought that to expose him designedly to the Philistines had nothing bad in it (Let not my hand be upon him, but the hand of the Philistines), whereas that malicious design against him was as truly murder before God as if he had slain him with his own hands.
[2.]What cheats they put upon the world. Saul pretended extraordinary kindness for David even when he aimed at his ruin, and was actually plotting it: Thou shalt be my son-in-law, says he (Sa1 18:21), notwithstanding he hated him implacably. Perhaps David refers to this when (Psa 55:21) he speaks of his enemy as one whose words were smoother than butter, but war was in his heart. It is probable that Saul's employing his servants to persuade David to enter into a treaty of a match with his daughter Michal (Sa1 18:22) arose from an apprehension that either his having cheated him about his elder daughter (Sa1 18:19) or the hardness of the terms he intended now to propose would make him decline it.
II.See how David conducted himself when the tide of Saul's displeasure ran thus high against him.
1.He behaved himself wisely in all his ways. He perceived Saul's jealousy of him, which made him very cautious and circumspect in every thing he said and did, and careful to give no offence. He did not complain of hard measure more make himself the head of a party, but managed all the affairs he was entrusted with as one that made it his business to do real service to his king and country, looking upon that to be the end of his preferment. And then the Lord was with him to give him success in all his undertakings. Though he procured Saul's ill-will by it, yet he obtained God's favour. Compare this with Psa 101:2, where it is David's promise, I will behave myself wisely; and that promise he here performed; and it is his prayer, O, when wilt thou come unto me? And that prayer God here answered: The Lord was with him. However blind fortune may seem to favour fools, God will own and bless those that behave themselves wisely.
2.When it was proposed to him to be son-in-law to the king he once and again received the proposal with all possible modesty and humility. When Saul proposed his elder daughter to him (Sa1 18:18) he said, Who am I, and what is my life? When the courtier proposed the younger, he took no notice of the affront Saul had put upon him in disposing of the elder from him, but continued in the same mind (Sa1 18:23): Seemeth it a light thing to you to be a king's son-in-law, seeing that I am a poor man and lightly esteemed? He knew Michal loved him, and yet did not offer to improve his interest in her affections for the gaining of her without her father's consent, but waited till it was proposed to him. And then see,
(1.)How highly he speaks of the honour offered him: To be son-in-law to the king. Though his king was but an upstart, in his original as mean as himself, in his management no better than he should be, yet, being a crowned head, he speaks of him and the royal family with all due respect. Note, Religion is so far from teaching us to be rude and unmannerly that it does not allow us to be so. We must render honour to whom honour is due.
(2.)How humbly he speaks of himself: Who am I? This did not proceed from a mean, abject, sneaking spirit, for when there was occasion he made it appear that he had as high a sense of honour as most men; nor was it from his jealousy of Saul (though he had reason enough to fear a snake under the green grass), but from him true and deep humility: Who am I, a poor man, and lightly esteemed? David had as much reason as any man to value himself. He was of an ancient and honourable family of Judah, a comely person, a great statesman and soldier; his achievements were great, for he had won Goliath's head and Michal's heart. He knew himself destined by the divine counsels to the throne of Israel, and yet, Whom am I, and what is my life? Note, It well becomes us, however God has advanced us, always to have low thoughts of ourselves. He that humbleth himself shall be exalted. And, if David thus magnified the honour of being son-in-law to the king, how should we magnify the honour of being sons (not in law, but in gospel) to the King of kings! Behold what manner of love the Father has bestowed upon us! Who are we that we should be thus dignified?
3.When the slaying of 100 Philistines was made the condition of David's marrying Saul's daughter he readily closed with it (Sa1 18:26): It pleased David well to be the king's son-in-law upon those terms; and, before the time given him for the action had expired, he doubled the demand, and slew 200, Sa1 18:27. He would not seem to suspect that Saul designed his hurt by it (though he had reason enough), but would rather act as if Saul had meant to consult his honour, and therefore cheerfully undertook it, as became a brave soldier and a true lover, though we may suppose it uneasy to Michal. David hereby discovered likewise,
(1.)A great confidence in the divine protection. He knew God was with him, and therefore, whatever Saul hoped, David did not fear falling by the Philistines, though he must needs expose himself much by such an undertaking as this.
(2.)A great zeal for the good of his country, which he would not decline any occasion of doing service to, though with the hazard of his life.
(3.)A right notion of honour, which consists not so much in being preferred as in deserving to be so. David was then pleased with the thoughts of being the king's son-in-law when he found the honour set at this high price, being more solicitous how to merit it than how to obtain it; nor could he wear it with satisfaction till he had won it.
4.Even after he was married he continued his good services to Israel. When the princes of the Philistines began to move towards another war David was ready to oppose them, and behaved himself more wisely than all the servants of Saul, Sa1 18:30. The law dispensed with men from going to war the first year after they were married (Deu 24:5), but David loved his country too well to make use of that dispensation. Many that have shown themselves forward to serve the public when they have been in pursuit of preferment have declined it when they have gained their point; but David acted from more generous principles.
III.Observe how God brought good to David out of Saul's project against him.
1.Saul gave him his daughter to be a snare to him, but in this respect that marriage was a kindness to him, that his being Saul's son-in-law made his succeeding him much the less invidious, especially when so many of his sons were slain with him, Sa1 31:2.
2.Saul thought, by putting him upon dangerous services, to have him taken off, but that very thing confirmed his interest in the people; for the more he did against the Philistines the better they loved him, so that his name was much set by (Sa1 18:30), which would make his coming to the crown the more easy. Thus God makes even the wrath of man to praise him and serves his designs of kindness to his own people by it.
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
One surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.
Therefore, Saul said to David: Behold my daughter Merab, etc. Above, where Saul, through the anointing of holy chrism and the governance of the kingdom, holds the type of Christ, we understood the two daughters of Saul to signify the peoples, who, begotten for salvation by faith in Christ and love, are perfected by the chastisement of body and mind; or certainly, the greater to designate the Synagogue, and the lesser, the Church. However, in this place, because the order of surrounding affairs has changed, David indeed designates the Lord Christ, but Saul, envying him, designates the people of the Jews. Rightly, the elder daughter, who was promised to David but not given, signifies that part of his people which, greater in number and power, was promised as if to be joined to a strong and desirable hand of a bridegroom, when the predecessors of that part, namely the scribes, priests, Pharisees, and elders of the people, would flock to his hearing, call him a good teacher, and not only that but also uniquely wise as a master, whether for the sake of learning or tempting him, would frequent him with questions. However, she was not given to him but to another, when those same teachers, seeking to be called Rabbi by men, forced as many as they could to listen to them instead. The younger daughter, who by loving David deserved to be given to him, is indeed that portion of the Jewish people which, both in smallness and contempt, preferred to follow, love, and hear the Lord Savior rather than the scribes and lawyers, hearing from him: "Do not be afraid, little flock, for it has pleased your Father to give you the kingdom" (Luke 12). Therefore, the Pharisees and other leaders of the Jews said to Christ: Behold, we entrust the greater part of the subjected Synagogue to you for teaching, just see to it that, being strong in spirit, you fight with word for the freedom of the people, who are commanded to keep the law of God and serve Him alone. For we know that you are truthful and do not care for anyone; for you do not regard the person of man, but teach the way of God in truth. Is it lawful to give tribute to Caesar, or not? (Matthew 22; Mark 12) They said this, however, in the presence of the ministers of Herod, so that if he forbade giving tribute, they, punishing him, might seem exempt from his death.
Continue studying 1 Samuel 18:17 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
1 Samuel 18:17 marks a pivotal and ominous shift in King Saul's relationship with David, exposing the depth of his escalating jealousy and treacherous intentions. Outwardly, Saul extends an offer to David: the hand of his elder daughter, Merab, in marriage, seemingly fulfilling a previous royal promise for David's heroic defeat of Goliath. However, this seemingly honorable proposal is a calculated and sinister trap, contingent upon David's continued valiant service in "the LORD'S battles," a condition Saul hopes will lead to David's death at the hands of the Philistines, thereby absolving himself of direct culpability for David's demise.
Context
Literary Context
This verse immediately follows David's meteoric rise in popularity after his victory over Goliath, which profoundly ignited King Saul's envy. The narrative explicitly states in 1 Samuel 18:8-9 that "Saul eyed David from that day forward." Prior to this, Saul had publicly promised great wealth, tax exemption, and the hand of his daughter to the man who defeated Goliath, as recorded in 1 Samuel 17:25. While the offer of Merab appears to be a fulfillment of this pledge, the latter half of 1 Samuel 18:17 explicitly reveals Saul's true, malevolent motive. This revelation sets the stage for a series of increasingly desperate and cunning attempts by Saul to eliminate David, including the subsequent offer of Michal in 1 Samuel 18:21, underscoring the escalating conflict between the two men.
Historical & Cultural Context
In the ancient Near East, royal marriages were far more than personal unions; they were strategic political alliances designed to consolidate power, reward loyal subjects, or integrate successful military leaders into the royal family. Saul's offer of Merab would typically be perceived as a supreme honor, elevating David's social standing and binding him to the monarchy. Simultaneously, the Philistines were the perennial and most formidable adversaries of Israel, posing a continuous and existential military threat. Sending a warrior into battle against them was a standard, albeit dangerous, expectation for military leaders. However, Saul's specific, stated intent to use this customary military engagement as a veiled assassination plot reveals a profound perversion of both royal duty and patriarchal responsibility, highlighting how cultural norms could be cynically exploited for personal malice.
Key Themes
This verse powerfully illustrates several critical themes prevalent throughout the book of 1 Samuel. Firstly, it underscores Saul's deepening treachery and moral decline, revealing how his initial admiration for David has mutated into murderous envy. His words, outwardly pious in commanding David to "fight the LORD'S battles," are inwardly malicious, starkly contrasting with his earlier, more righteous leadership. Secondly, the passage highlights the destructive power of unchecked envy, demonstrating how it can corrupt even a king, driving him to irrational and wicked schemes against an innocent and loyal servant. Thirdly, it subtly introduces the theme of divine protection over David, as despite Saul's cunning plots, God consistently preserves His chosen one, foreshadowing David's eventual ascension to the throne. Finally, the ironic use of "fighting the LORD'S battles" by Saul, who has largely abandoned God's will, juxtaposed with David's genuine embodiment of this commitment (as seen in 1 Samuel 17:45-47), underscores the contrast between Saul's declining spiritual state and David's unwavering devotion to God's purposes.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This word describes a force, whether of men, means, or other resources, encompassing an army, wealth, virtue, valor, or strength. When Saul instructs David to "be thou valiant," he ostensibly acknowledges David's proven military skill and courage, evident in his victory over Goliath. However, the profound irony lies in Saul's desire for David's "valiance" to lead him to his death, twisting a commendable attribute into a fatal trap. The term often describes a "man of valor" or "woman of valor" (e.g., Proverbs 31:10), implying not just physical strength but also character, effectiveness, and moral fortitude.
This primitive root means "to feed on" or "to consume," and by implication, "to battle" (as destruction). Saul's command to "fight the LORD'S battles" uses this verb, signifying active engagement in conflict. While outwardly a noble charge, Saul's intent transforms this command into a death sentence. The word emphasizes the destructive nature of warfare, which Saul hopes will be directed at David.
This primitive word refers to the open hand, indicating power, means, direction, or control. Saul's chilling declaration, "Let not mine hand be upon him, but let the hand of the Philistines be upon him," powerfully uses this term twice. It signifies his desire to avoid direct culpability, shifting the instrument of death from his own authority to the power and means of his enemies, the Philistines. The "hand" here represents agency and responsibility for the intended act.
Verse Breakdown
"And Saul said to David, Behold my elder daughter Merab, her will I give thee to wife:"
This initial clause presents the public facade of Saul's offer. It appears to be a direct fulfillment of the royal promise made to the victor over Goliath. The offer of Merab, as the elder daughter, would traditionally be a significant honor, designed to integrate David into the royal family and legitimize his rapidly rising status. This part of the verse skillfully sets up the deception that is about to be revealed.
"only be thou valiant for me, and fight the LORD'S battles."
This is the stated condition for the proposed marriage. On the surface, it sounds like a noble and patriotic charge: David is expected to continue his courageous military service on behalf of the king and for the divine purposes of Israel. However, the restrictive conjunction "only" subtly hints at a specific, perhaps excessive or perilous, expectation. Saul is not merely requesting continued service but demanding a level of dangerous engagement that he secretly hopes will result in David's death in combat.
"For Saul said, Let not mine hand be upon him, but let the hand of the Philistines be upon him."
This crucial parenthetical statement, likely a divine or narrative revelation of Saul's inner monologue and true intent, strips away all pretense from the honorable offer. It exposes the cold, calculating, and murderous nature of his plot. Saul explicitly desires David's demise but wishes to avoid direct culpability or the political fallout of a regicide. He prefers the Philistines to be the instruments of his malice, confirming the profound treachery inherent in his entire proposition.
Literary Devices
The passage masterfully employs several literary devices to convey its profound meaning and Saul's corrupt character. Irony is central, as Saul's public offer of his daughter and the noble command to "fight the LORD'S battles" are diametrically opposed to his private, murderous intent. This creates a stark contrast between appearance and reality. Juxtaposition is evident in the immediate placement of Saul's outwardly honorable declaration next to his privately sinister thought, highlighting the deep chasm between his words and his heart. The narrator's direct revelation of Saul's inner motive ("For Saul said...") serves as a powerful form of omniscient narration, granting the reader privileged access to the king's true character and exposing his duplicity. Furthermore, this verse serves as foreshadowing, indicating the beginning of Saul's relentless and increasingly desperate attempts to eliminate David, which will define much of the subsequent narrative in 1 Samuel.
Theological and Thematic Connections
This verse is a poignant illustration of the destructive power of human sin, particularly envy and fear, when unchecked in a position of authority. Saul's actions demonstrate a profound departure from righteous leadership, revealing a heart consumed by self-preservation rather than devotion to God's will. The theological truth that emerges is God's unwavering sovereignty and protection over His chosen servant, even amidst the most cunning human plots. Despite Saul's attempts to manipulate circumstances for David's demise, God's plan for David's life and his eventual kingship remains inviolable. This narrative underscores that no human scheme, however clever or malicious, can thwart the divine purpose.
Reflection and Application
1 Samuel 18:17 offers a sobering lesson on the insidious nature of envy and the critical importance of discerning true motives. Saul's outwardly honorable offer, cloaked in religious language ("fight the LORD'S battles"), serves as a potent reminder that not all seemingly good opportunities or requests come from pure hearts. We are called to cultivate spiritual discernment, relying on God's wisdom to navigate complex relationships and evaluate proposals, especially when they involve significant commitments or risks. This passage also powerfully illustrates the destructive path of unchecked jealousy, which can corrupt even those in positions of power and lead to desperate, unethical actions. For believers, it reinforces the comforting truth that God's protective hand is upon His servants, and His purposes will ultimately prevail over any human plotting or malice. Even when facing opposition that appears insurmountable or comes from unexpected sources, our ultimate trust must remain in the Lord, who is faithful to preserve and guide His own according to His perfect will.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did Saul offer Merab to David if he intended to harm him?
Saul's offer of Merab was a calculated act of deception, designed to achieve David's death without Saul directly implicating himself. By offering his daughter, Saul appeared to be honoring a previous royal promise (from 1 Samuel 17:25) and integrating David into the royal family. However, the condition attached—that David prove his valor by fighting the Philistines—was a strategic trap. Saul hoped that the Philistines, Israel's formidable enemies, would kill David in battle, thereby removing his rival while allowing Saul to maintain a facade of innocence and honor. This cunning scheme reveals the depth of Saul's fear and malice, as he sought to use external forces to accomplish his wicked desires.
What is the significance of Saul telling David to "fight the LORD'S battles" when his own heart was so corrupt?
The phrase "fight the LORD'S battles" carries significant theological weight, referring to wars fought under divine command and for God's purposes, with the expectation of divine assistance. For Saul to use this sacred language while harboring murderous intent is deeply ironic and highlights his profound spiritual decline. It demonstrates his hypocrisy and his willingness to manipulate religious rhetoric to achieve his personal, sinful agenda. While David genuinely fought for the Lord (as seen in 1 Samuel 17:45-47), Saul, by this point, was acting out of personal malice and fear, not divine mandate. This stark contrast underscores the vast difference between outward religious observance and a true heart devoted to God.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The narrative of Saul's treacherous plot against David in 1 Samuel 18:17, where an innocent and righteous servant is targeted by a king consumed by envy, powerfully foreshadows the ultimate treachery faced by the true King of Israel, Jesus Christ. Just as David was sent into perilous battles with the hope that he would perish, so too was Jesus sent into the ultimate battle against sin and death, not merely by human malice, but by the sovereign and redemptive plan of God. The "LORD'S battles" that David was commanded to fight find their ultimate and decisive fulfillment in Christ, who truly fought and won the spiritual war against the powers of darkness. While Saul sought David's death to preserve his own earthly throne, God orchestrated Christ's death on the cross, not as a defeat, but as the ultimate victory that secured salvation for all humanity. The treachery of Saul, who desired David's demise at the hands of the Philistines, finds its profound parallel in the betrayal of Judas and the unjust condemnation by the religious authorities, leading to Christ's crucifixion by the Roman authorities (see Matthew 26:14-16 and John 19:10-11). Yet, just as God protected David and ultimately elevated him to the throne, so too did God raise Jesus from the dead, seating Him at His right hand as King of kings and Lord of lords, demonstrating that no human plot or earthly power can thwart the divine will (see Philippians 2:8-11 and Acts 2:23-24). Christ, the true Valiant One, fought the ultimate "LORD'S battle" and emerged victorious, securing eternal life and an everlasting kingdom for all who believe.