Skip to content
“Israel’s Rebellion and Temptation”· Psalms 78:17–33
Translation
King James Version
Because they believed not in God, and trusted not in his salvation:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Because they believed H539 H8689 not in God H430, and trusted H982 H8804 not in his salvation H3444:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
because they had no faith in God, no trust in his power to save.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
because they did not believe God or rely on His salvation.
Ask
American Standard Version
Because they believed not in God, And trusted not in his salvation.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
because they didn’t believe in God, and didn’t trust in his salvation <n>[yeshuat]</n>.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Because they beleeued not in God, and trusted not in his helpe.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
For they have not believed in God, Nor have they trusted in His salvation.
Ask
Tagalog · ADB
Sapagka't sila'y hindi nagsisampalataya sa Dios, at hindi nagsitiwala sa kaniyang pagliligtas.
Ask
In the KJVVerse 15,136 of 31,102 · 48.7%

Study This Verse

Summary

Psalms 78:22 encapsulates the profound spiritual failure of ancient Israel during their wilderness wanderings, identifying their persistent unbelief and distrust in God's redemptive power as the root cause of their prolonged suffering and exclusion from the Promised Land. Despite witnessing countless divine miracles and provisions, the people repeatedly demonstrated a fundamental lack of faith in God's character and His ability to deliver on His promises, leading to severe consequences and serving as a timeless warning against spiritual apathy and doubt.

Context

Literary Context

Psalm 78 is a sweeping historical psalm, a maskil or instructional poem, attributed to Asaph. It meticulously recounts Israel's history from the Exodus through the establishment of the Davidic monarchy, serving as a didactic narrative for future generations. Preceding Psalms 78:22 are vivid descriptions of God's miraculous provisions in the wilderness, including the manna from heaven (Psalms 78:24) and water from the rock (Psalms 78:15-16). Despite these overwhelming displays of divine power and faithfulness, the people continued to test God, grumble, and doubt His capabilities, particularly regarding His ability to provide food in the wilderness. Psalms 78:22 acts as a concise summary statement, pinpointing the underlying spiritual condition—their profound lack of belief and trust—that fueled their rebellious actions and invited divine judgment. It sets the stage for the subsequent verses which detail the consequences of their unbelief, such as the sending of quail and the subsequent plague.

Historical & Cultural Context

The psalm reflects the historical period of the Exodus and the forty-year wilderness wandering, a foundational narrative for Israel's identity. During this time, the Israelites were a nomadic people, entirely dependent on divine provision in a harsh, barren environment. Their journey was marked by a series of tests and divine interventions, designed to teach them reliance on Yahweh. Culturally, the covenant relationship established at Sinai (Exodus 19) demanded exclusive loyalty and trust in God as their deliverer and provider. The failure to trust in God's "salvation" (deliverance) directly challenged the core of this covenant. Their grumbling and desire to return to Egypt (Numbers 14:1-4) illustrate a deep-seated distrust in God's plan and power, preferring known slavery over unknown freedom with God. This historical context underscores the gravity of their spiritual failure, as it occurred despite direct, undeniable evidence of God's presence and power.

Key Themes

The overarching theme of Psalm 78 is the contrast between God's enduring faithfulness and Israel's recurring faithlessness. The psalm serves as a powerful reminder of the consequences of unbelief, demonstrating how a lack of trust in God's character and promises leads to spiritual stagnation and divine discipline. It highlights the importance of remembering God's works and teaching them to future generations (Psalms 78:3-7), lest they repeat the mistakes of their ancestors. The narrative implicitly emphasizes divine patience and long-suffering in the face of human rebellion, yet it also clearly articulates that there are limits to God's forbearance, and persistent unbelief will incur judgment. This psalm, therefore, functions as a profound theological reflection on the nature of faith, the dangers of spiritual amnesia, and the unwavering character of God even amidst human failure, echoing the New Testament's warning about the peril of unbelief.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Believed not ʼâman' H539

The root אָמַן (ʼâman') signifies firmness, stability, trustworthiness, and reliability. When negated, as here, it points to a fundamental lack of conviction, a failure to stand firm in reliance upon God's character and promises. It's more than intellectual assent; it's a failure to find God reliable or to establish one's life upon Him as a secure foundation. This is the root from which "Amen" derives, meaning "so be it," expressing affirmation and certainty. Their failure to 'âman meant they did not find God to be "Amen" in their lives.

Trusted not bâṭach' H982

The Hebrew verb בָּטַח (bâṭach') conveys the idea of leaning on, feeling secure, or having confidence in someone or something. It implies a practical, experiential reliance—a sense of safety and security found in the object of trust. The negation here indicates that despite God's mighty acts, the Israelites did not practically lean on Him for their daily needs or future, nor did they feel secure in His care. Their lack of bâṭach manifested in grumbling, fear, and a desire to return to Egypt, rather than resting in God's protective and providing hand.

His salvation yᵉshûwʻâh' H3444

The noun יְשׁוּעָה (yᵉshûwʻâh') refers to deliverance, help, welfare, or victory. It encompasses God's acts of rescue and provision, both physical (e.g., deliverance from Egypt, provision of manna) and spiritual. The Israelites failed to trust in God's active, ongoing deliverance, despite having experienced it profoundly. This term is rich with implications for God's redemptive work, foreshadowing the ultimate deliverance found in the person of Jesus, whose name (Yeshua) is derived from this root.

Verse Breakdown

"Because they believed not in God"

This clause identifies the foundational spiritual deficiency. It's not merely a lack of intellectual acknowledgment of God's existence, but a profound failure to place their faith and conviction in Him. This "not believing" implies a rejection of God's revealed character, His power, and His promises, despite overwhelming evidence. It speaks to a heart condition of skepticism and doubt, a refusal to commit their trust to the One who had proven Himself faithful.

"and trusted not in his salvation"

This second clause elaborates on the first, specifying the practical manifestation of their unbelief. Their lack of trust was directed specifically at God's capacity and willingness to deliver them from their immediate circumstances and to fulfill His long-term promises. Despite being delivered from Egypt, provided for in the wilderness, and promised a land flowing with milk and honey, they did not lean on His redemptive acts or anticipate His future provision. This reveals a deep-seated insecurity and a failure to rest in God's comprehensive plan for their welfare and ultimate victory.

Literary Devices

Psalm 78:22 primarily employs Cause-and-Effect and Repetition to underscore its message. The verse itself functions as a cause for the subsequent divine judgments detailed in the psalm, clearly stating that Israel's unbelief and distrust were the direct reasons for God's displeasure and the withholding of blessings. The parallel structure of "believed not in God" and "trusted not in his salvation" uses Synonymy and Parallelism to reinforce the central idea of faithlessness. While not strictly a literary device, the verse also exemplifies Conciseness, distilling a complex spiritual failure into a potent, memorable statement. The psalm as a whole is a Historical Narrative, using the past to instruct the present, and this verse is a key interpretive lens through which to understand the entire historical account presented by Asaph.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Psalms 78:22 serves as a stark theological declaration, establishing unbelief and distrust as cardinal sins that sever the covenantal relationship and impede divine blessing. It underscores that true faith is not merely intellectual assent but a profound, active reliance on God's character and His redemptive power. The Israelites' failure to believe in God and trust in His salvation highlights the enduring tension between human responsibility and divine sovereignty, demonstrating that while God is faithful to His promises, human faithlessness can prevent the experience of His full blessings. This verse resonates deeply with the broader biblical narrative, emphasizing that faith is the fundamental posture required for a right relationship with God and for entering into His rest.

Reflection and Application

Psalms 78:22 offers a timeless mirror for self-examination, challenging believers to honestly assess the depth of their own faith and trust in God. Just as the Israelites doubted God's ability to provide in the wilderness, we often struggle to fully trust Him with our daily needs, financial security, health challenges, or uncertain futures. This verse calls us beyond a superficial acknowledgment of God to a profound, active reliance on His character, His promises, and His comprehensive "salvation" in every area of our lives. It reminds us that genuine faith is not merely intellectual assent but a practical leaning into God, a confident expectation of His faithfulness even when circumstances seem dire. By learning from Israel's costly mistakes, we are exhorted to cultivate a resilient, unwavering trust that enables us to experience the fullness of God's provision and guidance, rather than being hindered by the spiritual paralysis of doubt and unbelief.

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what specific areas of your life do you find it most challenging to fully trust God's provision or "salvation"?
  2. How does your daily life reflect a deep-seated belief in God's character and promises, or does it reveal underlying patterns of distrust?
  3. What practical steps can you take to cultivate a more profound and consistent trust in God, especially when facing uncertainty or difficulty?
  4. How might a lack of trust in God's "salvation" (deliverance) manifest in your attitudes or actions today?

FAQ

What does "salvation" mean in Psalms 78:22, and how does it relate to the New Testament concept?

In Psalms 78:22, "salvation" (Hebrew: yᵉshûwʻâh) primarily refers to God's acts of deliverance, rescue, and provision in a comprehensive sense. For the Israelites in the wilderness, this included their miraculous liberation from Egyptian bondage, the daily provision of manna and water, protection from enemies, and the promise of a land of their own. It encompassed all the ways God actively intervened to secure their welfare and future. While it includes physical deliverance, it also carries the broader sense of God's redemptive work for His people. In the New Testament, this concept of yᵉshûwʻâh finds its ultimate fulfillment in Jesus Christ. His name, Yeshua, is derived from the same Hebrew root, signifying "Yahweh saves." Therefore, the New Testament concept of salvation, while encompassing eternal spiritual deliverance from sin and death through Christ's atoning work, also includes His ongoing provision, protection, and guidance for believers, echoing the comprehensive yᵉshûwʻâh that the Israelites failed to trust in. The ultimate salvation is found in Jesus Christ, who delivers us from the power and penalty of sin.

Why did the Israelites, after witnessing so many miracles, still "believe not" and "trust not"?

The Israelites' persistent unbelief, despite witnessing extraordinary miracles like the parting of the Red Sea (Exodus 14) and the daily manna, stemmed from a deep-seated spiritual issue—a hardened heart and a lack of genuine faith. Their unbelief was not due to a lack of evidence, but a refusal to internalize that evidence and allow it to transform their hearts and actions. This resistance often arose from fear, a desire for immediate gratification, a longing for the perceived security of their past life in Egypt, and a failure to remember God's past faithfulness. Their trust was often conditional, based on immediate circumstances rather than God's unchanging character. The psalm itself attributes this to their "stubborn and rebellious heart" (Psalms 78:8), highlighting a spiritual blindness and unwillingness to fully surrender to God's will and way, a pattern that the New Testament also warns against in passages like Hebrews 3.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Psalms 78:22, with its indictment of Israel's profound unbelief and distrust in God's salvation, powerfully foreshadows the necessity of faith in the ultimate "salvation" offered through Jesus Christ. The Israelites failed to trust in God's temporal deliverance and provision, leading to their exclusion from the earthly Promised Land. This historical failure serves as a poignant type, pointing to the greater spiritual reality that without faith in Christ, humanity remains excluded from God's eternal rest and true salvation. Jesus is the ultimate yᵉshûwʻâh, the very embodiment of God's deliverance, whose name means "Yahweh saves." Where Israel failed to believe God's promises and trust in His power to save them from physical perils, believers are now called to place their trust in Christ's completed work on the cross, which delivers them from the far greater peril of sin and eternal death (Romans 10:9-10). His sacrifice is the definitive act of God's salvation, providing a new covenant grounded not in human obedience and trust, which consistently failed, but in divine grace received through faith (Ephesians 2:8-9). Thus, Psalms 78:22 stands as a stark reminder of the consequences of unbelief, driving us to embrace the perfect and complete salvation found only in the person and work of the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Psalms 78:9–39. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 31 verses
Passage under commentPsalms 78:9–39
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

In these verses,

I.The psalmist observes the late rebukes of Providence that the people of Israel had been under, which they had brought upon themselves by their dealing treacherously with God, Psa 78:9-11. The children of Ephraim, in which tribe Shiloh was, though they were well armed and shot with bows, yet turned back in the day of battle. This seems to refer to that shameful defeat which the Philistines gave them in Eli's time, when they took the ark prisoner, Sa1 4:10, Sa1 4:11. Of this the psalmist here begins to speak, and, after a long digression, returns to it again, Psa 78:61. Well might that event be thus fresh in mind in David's time, above forty years after, for the ark, which in that memorable battle was seized by the Philistines, though it was quickly brought out of captivity, was never brought out of obscurity till David fetched it from Kirjath-jearim to his own city. Observe,

1.The shameful cowardice of the children of Ephraim, that warlike tribe, so famed for valiant men, Joshua's tribe; the children of that tribe, though as well armed as ever, turned back when they came to face the enemy. Note, Weapons of war stand men in little stead without a martial spirit, and that is gone if God be gone. Sin dispirits men and takes away the heart.

2.The causes of their cowardice, which were no less shameful; and these were,

(1.)A shameful violation of God's law and their covenant with him (Psa 78:10); they were basely treacherous and perfidious, for they kept not the covenant of God, and basely stubborn and rebellious (as they were described, Psa 78:8), for they peremptorily refused to walk in his law, and, in effect, told him to his face they would not be ruled by him.

(2.)A shameful ingratitude to God for the favours he had bestowed upon them: They forgot his works and his wonders, his works of wonder which they ought to have admired, Psa 78:11. Note, Our forgetfulness of God's works is at the bottom of our disobedience to his laws.

II.He takes occasion hence to consult precedents and to compare this with the case of their fathers, who were in like manner unmindful of God's mercies to them and ungrateful to their founder and great benefactor, and were therefore often brought under his displeasure. The narrative in these verses is very remarkable, for it relates a kind of struggle between God's goodness and man's badness, and mercy, at length, rejoices against judgment.

1.God did great things for his people Israel when he first incorporated them and formed them into a people: Marvellous things did he in the sight of their fathers, and not only in their sight, but in their cause, and for their benefit, so strange, so kind, that one would think they should never be forgotten. What he did for them in the land of Egypt is only just mentioned here (Psa 78:12), but afterwards resumed, Psa 78:43. He proceeds here to show,

(1.)How he made a lane for them through the Red Sea, and caused them, gave them courage, to pass through, though the waters stood over their heads as a heap, Psa 78:13. See Isa 63:12, Isa 63:13, where God is said to lead them by the hand, as it were, through the deep that they should not stumble.

(2.)How he provided a guide for them through the untrodden paths of the wilderness (Psa 78:14); he led them step by step, in the day time by a cloud, which also sheltered them from the heat, and all the night with a light of fire, which perhaps warmed the air; at least it made the darkness of night less frightful, and perhaps kept off wild beasts, Zac 2:5.

(3.)How he furnished their camp with fresh water in a dry and thirsty land where no water was, not by opening the bottles of heaven (that would have been a common way), but by broaching a rock (Psa 78:15, Psa 78:16): He clave the rocks in the wilderness, which yielded water, though they were not capable of receiving it either from the clouds above or the springs beneath. Out of the dry and hard rock he gave them drink, not distilled as out of an alembic, drop by drop, but in streams running down like rivers, and as out of the great depths. God gives abundantly, and is rich in mercy; he gives seasonably, and sometimes makes us to feel the want of mercies that we may the better know the worth of them. This water which God gave Israel out of the rock was the more valuable because it was spiritual drink. And that rock was Christ.

2.When God began thus to bless them they began to affront him (Psa 78:17): They sinned yet more against him, more than they had done in Egypt, though there they were bad enough, Eze 20:8. They bore the miseries of their servitude better than the difficulties of their deliverance, and never murmured at their taskmasters so much as they did at Moses and Aaron; as if they were delivered to do all these abominations, Jer 7:10. As sin sometimes takes occasion by the commandment, so at other times it takes occasion by the deliverance, to become more exceedingly sinful. They provoked the Most High. Though he is most high, and they knew themselves an unequal match for him, yet they provoked him and even bade defiance to his justice; and this in the wilderness, where he had them at his mercy and therefore they were bound in interest to please him, and where he showed them so much mercy and therefore they were bound in gratitude to please him; yet there they said and did that which they knew would provoke him: They tempted God in their heart, Psa 78:18. Their sin began in their heart, and thence it took its malignity. They do always err in their heart, Heb 3:10. Thus they tempted God, tried his patience to the utmost, whether he would bear with them or no, and, in effect, bade him do his worst. Two ways they provoked him: - (1.) By desiring, or rather demanding, that which he had not thought fit to give them: They asked meat for their lust. God had given them meat for their hunger, in the manna, wholesome pleasant food and in abundance; he had given them meat for their faith out of the heads of leviathan which he broke in pieces, Psa 74:14. But all this would not serve; they must have meat for their lust, dainties and varieties to gratify a luxurious appetite. Nothing is more provoking to God than our quarrelling with our allotment and indulging the desires of the flesh. (2.) By distrusting his power to give them what they desired. This was tempting God indeed. They challenged him to give them flesh; and, if he did not, they would say it was because he could not, not because he did not see it fit for them (Psa 78:19): They spoke against God. Those that set bounds to God's power speak against him. It was as injurious a reflection as could be cat upon God to say, Can God furnish a table in the wilderness? They had manna, but the did not think they had a table furnished unless they had boiled and roast, a first, a second, and a third course, as they had in Egypt, where they had both flesh and fish, and sauce too (Exo 16:3, Num 11:5), dishes of meat and salvers of fruit. What an unreasonable insatiable thin is luxury! Such a mighty thing did these epicures think a table well furnished to be that they thought it was more than God himself could give them in that wilderness; whereas the beasts of the forest, and all the fowls of the mountains, are his, Psa 50:10, Psa 50:11. Their disbelief of God's power was so much the worse in that they did at the same time own that he had done as much as that came to (Psa 78:20): Behold, he smote the rock, that the waters gushed out, which they and their cattle drank of. And which is easier, to furnish a table in the wilderness, which a rich man can do, or to fetch water out of a rock, which the greatest potentate on the earth cannot do? Never did unbelief, though always unreasonable, ask so absurd a question: "Can he that melted down a rock into streams of water give bread also? Or can he that has given bread provide flesh also?" Is any thing too hard for Omnipotence? When once the ordinary powers of nature are exceeded God has made bare his arm, and we must conclude that nothing is impossible with him. Be it ever so great a thing that we ask, it becomes us to own, Lord, if thou wilt, thou canst.

3.God justly resented the provocation and was much displeased with them (Psa 78:21): The Lord heard this, and was wroth. Note, God is a witness to all our murmurings and distrusts; he hears them and is much displeased with them. A fire was kindled for this against Jacob; the fire of the Lord burnt among them, Num 11:1. Or it may be understood of the fire of God's anger which came up against Israel. To unbelievers our God is himself a consuming fire. Those that will not believe the power of God's mercy shall feel the power of his indignation, and be made to confess that it is a fearful thing to fall into his hands. Now here we are told,

(1.)Why God thus resented the provocation (Psa 78:22): Because by this it appeared that they believed not in God; they did not give credit to the revelation he had made of himself to them, for they durst not commit themselves to him, nor venture themselves with him: They trusted not in the salvation he had begun to work for them; for then they would not thus have questioned its progress. Those cannot be said to trust in God's salvation as their felicity at last who cannot find in their hearts to trust in his providence for food convenient in the way to it. That which aggravated their unbelief was the experience they had had of the power and goodness of God, Psa 78:23-25. He had given them undeniable proofs of his power, not only on earth beneath, but in heaven above; for he commanded the clouds from above, as one that had created them and commanded them into being; he made what use he pleased of them. Usually by their showers they contribute to the earth's producing corn; but now, when God so commanded them, they showered down corn themselves, which is therefore called here the corn of heaven; for heaven can do the work without the earth, but not the earth without heaven. God, who has the key of the clouds, opened the doors of heaven, and that is more than opening the windows, which yet is spoken of as a great blessing, Mal 3:10. To all that by faith and prayer ask, seek, and knock, these doors shall at any time be opened; for the God of heaven is rich in mercy to all that call upon him. He not only keeps a good house, but keeps open house. Justly might God take it ill that they should distrust him when he had been so very kind to them that he had rained down manna upon them to eat, substantial food, daily, duly, enough for all, enough for each. Man did eat angels' food, such as angels, if they had occasion for food, would eat and be thankful for; or rather such as was given by the ministry of angels, and (as the Chaldee reads it) such as descended from the dwelling of angels. Every one, even the least child in Israel, did eat the bread of the mighty (so the margin reads it); the weakest stomach could digest it, and yet it was so nourishing that it was strong meat for strong men. And, though the provision was so good, yet they were not stinted, nor ever reduced to short allowance; for he sent them meat to the full. If they gathered little, it was their own fault; and yet even then they had no lack, Exo 16:18. The daily provision God makes for us, and has made ever since we came into the world, though it has not so much of miracle as this, has no less of mercy, and is therefore a great aggravation of our distrust of God.

(2.)How he expressed his resentment of the provocation, not in denying them what they so inordinately lusted after, but in granting it to them.

[1.]Did they question his power? He soon gave them a sensible conviction that he could furnish a table in the wilderness. Though the winds seem to blow where they list, yet, when he pleased, he could make them his caterers to fetch in provisions, Psa 78:26. He caused an east wind to blow and a south wind, either a south-east wind, or an east wind first to bring in the quails from that quarter and then a south wind to bring in more from that quarter; so that he rained flesh upon them, and that of the most delicate sort, not butchers' meat, but wild-fowl, and abundance of it, as dust, as the sand of the sea (Psa 78:27), so that the meanest Israelite might have sufficient; and it cost them nothing, no, not the pains of fetching it from the mountains, for he let it fall in the midst of their camp, round about their habitation, Psa 78:28. We have the account Num 11:31, Num 11:32. See how good God is even to the evil and unthankful, and wonder that his goodness does not overcome their badness. See what little reason we have to judge of God's love by such gifts of his bounty as these; dainty bits are no tokens of his peculiar favour. Christ gave dry bread to the disciples that he loved, but a sop dipped in the sauce to Judas that betrayed him.

[2.]Did they defy his justice and boast that they had gained their point? He made them pay dearly for their quails; for, though he gave them their own desire, they were not estranged from their lust (Psa 78:29, Psa 78:30); their appetite was insatiable; they were well filled and yet they were not satisfied; for they knew not what they would have. Such is the nature of lust; it is content with nothing, and the more it is humoured the more humoursome it grows. Those that indulge their lust will never be estranged from it. Or it intimates that God's liberality did not make them ashamed of their ungrateful lustings, as it would have done if they had had any sense of honour. But what came of it? While the meat was yet in their mouth, rolled under the tongue as a sweet morsel, the wrath of God came upon them and slew the fattest of them (Psa 78:31), those that were most luxurious and most daring. See Num 11:33, Num 11:34. They were fed as sheep for the slaughter: the butcher takes the fattest first. We may suppose there were some pious and contented Israelites, that did eat moderately of the quails and were never the worse; for it was not the meat that poisoned them, but their own lust. Let epicures and sensualists here read their doom. The end of those who make a god of their belly is destruction, Phi 3:19. The prosperity of fools shall destroy them, and their ruin will be the greater.

4.The judgments of God upon them did not reform them, nor attain the end, any more than his mercies (Psa 78:32): For all this, they sinned still; they murmured and quarrelled with God and Moses as much as ever. Though God was wroth and smote them, yet they went on frowardly in the way of their heart (Isa 57:17); they believed not for his wondrous works. Though his works of justice were as wondrous and as great proofs of his power as his works of mercy, yet they were not wrought upon by them to fear God, nor convinced how much it was their interest to make him their friend. Those hearts are hard indeed that will neither be melted by the mercies of God nor broken by his judgments.

5.They persisting in their sins, God proceeded in his judgments, but they were judgments of another nature, which wrought not suddenly, but slowly. He punished them not now with such acute diseases as that was which slew the fattest of them, but a lingering chronical distemper (Psa 78:33): Therefore their days did he consume in vanity in the wilderness and their years in trouble. By an irreversible doom they were condemned to wear out thirty-eight tedious years in the wilderness, which indeed were consumed in vanity; for in all those years there was not a step taken nearer Canaan, but they were turned back again, and wandered to and fro as in a labyrinth, not one stroke struck towards the conquest of it: and not only in vanity, but in trouble, for their carcases were condemned to fall in the wilderness and there they all perished but Caleb and Joshua. Note, Those that sin still must expect to be in trouble still. And the reason why we spend our days in so much vanity and trouble, why we live with so little comfort and to so little purpose, is because we do not live by faith.

6.Under these rebukes they professed repentance, but they were not cordial and sincere in this profession.

(1.)Their profession was plausible enough (Psa 78:34, Psa 78:35): When he slew them, or condemned them to be slain, then they sought him; they confessed their fault, and begged his pardon. When some were slain others in a fright cried to God for mercy, and promised they would reform and be very good; then they returned to God, and enquired early after him. So one would have taken them to be such as desired to find him. And they pretended to do this because, however they had forgotten it formerly, now they remembered that God was their rock and therefore now that they needed him they would fly to him and take shelter in him, and that the high God was their Redeemer, who brought them out of Egypt and to whom therefore they might come with boldness. Afflictions are sent to put us in mind of God as our rock and our redeemer; for, in prosperity, we are apt to forget him.

(2.)They were not sincere in this profession (Psa 78:36, Psa 78:37): They did but flatter him with their mouth, as if they thought by fair speeches to prevail with him to revoke the sentence and remove the judgment, with a secret intention to break their word when the danger was over; they did not return to God with their whole heart, but feignedly, Jer 3:10. All their professions, prayers, and promises, were extorted by the rack. It was plain that they did not mean as they said, for they did not adhere to it. They thawed in the sun, but froze in the shade. They did but lie to God with their tongues, for their heart was not with him, was not right with him, as appeared by the issue, for they were not stedfast in his covenant. They were not sincere in their reformation, for they were not constant; and, by thinking thus to impose upon a heart-searching God, they really put as great an affront upon him as by any of their reflections.

7.God hereupon, in pity to them, put a stop to the judgments which were threatened and in part executed (Psa 78:38, Psa 78:39): But he, being full of compassion, forgave their iniquity. One would think this counterfeit repentance should have filled up the measure of their iniquity. What could be more provoking than to lie thus to the holy God, than thus to keep back part of the price, the chief part? Act 5:3. And yet he, being full of compassion, forgave their iniquity thus far, that he did not destroy them and cut them off from being a people, as he justly might have done, but spared their lives till they had reared another generation which should enter into the promised land. Destroy it not, for a blessing is in it, Isa 65:8. Many a time he turned his anger away (for he is Lord of his anger) and did not stir up all his wrath, to deal with them as they deserved: and why did he not? Not because their ruin would have been any loss to him, but,

(1.)Because he was full of compassion and, when he was going to destroy them, his repentings were kindled together, and he said, How shall I give thee up, Ephraim? How shall I deliver thee, Israel? Hos 11:8.

(2.)Because, though they did not rightly remember that he was their rock, he remembered that they were but flesh. He considered the corruption of their nature, which inclined them to evil, and was pleased to make that an excuse for his sparing them, though it was really no excuse for their sin. See Gen 6:3. He considered the weakness and frailty of their nature, and what an easy thing it would be to crush them: They are as a wind that passeth away and cometh not again. They may soon be taken off, but, when they are gone, they are gone irrecoverably, and then what will become of the covenant with Abraham? They are flesh, they are wind; whence it were easy to argue they may justly, they may immediately, be cut off, and there would be no loss of them: but God argues, on the contrary, therefore he will not destroy them; for the true reason is, He is full of compassion.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Historical Reception

One surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.

1 quote · AD 430
Lastly, when both these things have been briefly touched, afterwards he is evidently following out the order of the narrative. "Because they believed not in God, nor hoped in His saving health" [Psalm 78:22]. For when he had told why fire was lighted in Jacob, and anger went up upon Israel, that is to say, "because they believed not in God, nor hoped in His saving health:" immediately subjoining the evident blessings for which they were ungrateful, he says, "and He commanded the clouds above, and opened the doors of Heaven" [Psalm 78:23]. "And He rained upon them manna to eat, and gave them bread of Heaven" [Psalm 78:24]. "Bread of angels man did eat: dainties He sent them in abundance" [Psalm 78:25]. He brought over the South Wind from Heaven, and in His virtue He led in the South West Wind [Psalm 78:26]. "And He rained upon them fleshes like dust, and winged fowls like the sand of the sea" [Psalm 78:27]. "And they fell in the midst of their camp, around their tabernacles" [Psalm 78:28]. "And they ate and were filled exceedingly; and their desire He brought to them: they were not deprived of their desire" [Psalm 78:29]. Behold why He had delayed. But what He had delayed let us hear. "Yet the morsel was in their mouths, and the anger of God came down upon them" [Psalm 78:30]. Behold what He had delayed. For before "He delayed:" and afterwards, "fire was lighted in Jacob and anger went up upon Israel." He had delayed therefore in order that He might first do what they had believed that He could not do, and then might bring upon them what they deserved to suffer. For if they placed their hope in God, not only would their desires of the flesh but also those of the spirit have been fulfilled. For he that..."opened the doors of Heaven, and rained upon them manna to eat," that He might fill the unbelieving, is not without power to give to believers Himself the true Bread from Heaven, which the manna did signify: which is indeed the food of Angels, whom being incorruptible the Word of God does incorruptibly feed: the which in order that man might eat, He became flesh, and dwelled in us. [John 1:44] For Himself the Bread by means of the Evangelical clouds is being rained over the whole world, and, the hearts of preachers like heavenly doors, being opened, is being preached not to a murmuring and tempting synagogue, but to a Church believing and putting hope in Him. He is able also to feed the feeble faith of such as tempt not, but believe, with the signs of words uttered by the flesh and speeding through the air, as though it were fowls: not however with such as come from the north, where cold and mist do prevail, that is to say, eloquence which is pleasing to this world, but by bringing over the South Wind from Heaven; whither, except to the earth? In order that they who are feeble in faith, by hearing things earthly may be nourished up to receive things heavenly....
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Psalms 78:22 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.