Ecclesiastes 1:2
“The Words of the Preacher: All Is Vanity”Ecclesiastes 1:1–3
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- הֲבֵלha·Velfutility ofH1892N-mscNoun Singular Masculine Construct
- הֲבָלִיםha·va·LimfutilitiesH1892N-mpNoun Plural Masculine Absolute
- אָמַר'a·Marhe saidH559V-Qal-Perf-3msVerb Qal Perfect 3rd Singular Masculine
- קֹהֶלֶתko·He·letTeacherH6953N-fsNoun Singular Feminine Absolute
- הֲבֵלha·Velfutility ofH1892N-mscNoun Singular Masculine Construct
- הֲבָלִיםha·va·LimfutilitiesH1892N-mpNoun Plural Masculine Absolute
- הַכֹּלha·Kol[the] everythingH3605Art ¦ N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absoluteהַ[the]כֹּלeverything
- הָבֶלHa·vel[is] futilityH1892N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absolute
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Ecclesiastes 1:1–3. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
Here is, I. An account of the penman of this book; it was Solomon, for no other son of David was king of Jerusalem; but he conceals his name Solomon, peaceable, because by his sin he had brought trouble upon himself and his kingdom, had broken his peace with God and lost the peace of his conscience, and therefore was no more worthy of that name. Call me not Solomon, call me Marah, for, behold, for peace I had great bitterness. But he calls himself,
1.The preacher, which intimates his present character. He is Koheleth, which comes from a word which signifies to gather; but it is of a feminine termination, by which perhaps Solomon intends to upbraid himself with his effeminacy, which contributed more than any thing to his apostasy; for it was to please his wives that he set up idols, Nehemiah 13:26. Or the word soul must be understood, and so Koheleth is,
(1.)A penitent soul, or one gathered, one that had rambled and gone astray like a lost sheep, but was now reduced, gathered in from his wanderings, gathered home to his duty, and come at length to himself. The spirit that was dissipated after a thousand vanities is now collected and made to centre in God. Divine grace can make great sinners great converts, and renew even those to repentance who, after they had known the way of righteousness, turned aside from it, and heal their backslidings, though it is a difficult case. It is only the penitent soul that God will accept, the heart that is broken, not the head that is bowed down like a bulrush only for a day, David's repentance, not Ahab's. And it is only the gathered soul that is the penitent soul, that comes back from its by-paths, that no longer scatters its way to the strangers (Jeremiah 3:13), but is united to fear God's name. Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth will speak, and therefore we have here the words of the penitent, and those published. If eminent professors of religion fall into gross sin, they are concerned, for the honour of God and the repairing of the damage they have done to his kingdom, openly to testify their repentance, that the antidote may be administered as extensively as the poison.
(2.)A preaching soul, or one gathering. Being himself gathered to the congregation of saints, out of which he had by his sin thrown himself, and being reconciled to the church, he endeavours to gather others to it that had gone astray like him, and perhaps were led astray by his example. He that has done any thing to seduce his brother ought to do all he can to restore him. Perhaps Solomon called together a congregation of his people, as he had done at the dedication of the temple (1 Kings 8:2), so now at the rededicating of himself. In that assembly he presided as the people's mouth to God in prayer (Ecclesiastes 1:12); in this as God's mouth to them in preaching. God by his Spirit made him a preacher, in token of his being reconciled to him; a commission is a tacit pardon. Christ sufficiently testifies his forgiving Peter by committing his lambs and sheep to his trust. Observe, Penitents should be preachers; those that have taken warning themselves to turn and live should give warning to others not to go on and die. When thou art converted strengthen thy brethren. Preachers must be preaching souls, for that only is likely to reach to the heart that comes from the heart. Paul served God with his spirit in the gospel of his Son, Romans 1:9.
2.The son of David. His taking this title intimates,
(1.)That he looked upon it as a great honour to be the son of so good a man, and valued himself very much upon it.
(2.)That he also looked upon it as a great aggravation of his sin that he had such a father, who had given him a good education and put up many a good prayer for him; it cuts him to the heart to think that he should be a blemish and disgrace to the name and family of such a one as David. It aggravated the sin of Jehoiakim that he was the son of Josiah, Jeremiah 22:15-17.
(3.)That his being the son of David encouraged him to repent and hope for mercy, for David had fallen into sin, by which he should have been warned not to sin, but was not; but David repented, and therein he took example from him and found mercy as he did. Yet this was not all; he was that son of David concerning whom God had said that though he would chasten his transgression with the rod, yet he would not break his covenant with him, Psalm 89:34. Christ, the great preacher, was the Son of David.
3.King of Jerusalem. This he mentions,
(1.)As that which was a very great aggravation of his sin. He was a king. God had done much for him, in raising him to the throne, and yet he had so ill requited him; his dignity made the bad example and influence of his sin the more dangerous, and many would follow his pernicious ways; especially as he was king of Jerusalem, the holy city, where God's temple was, and of his own building too, where the priests, the Lord's ministers, were, and his prophets who had taught him better things.
(2.)As that which might give some advantage to what he wrote, for where the word of a king is there is power. He thought it no disparagement to him, as a king, to be a preacher; but the people would regard him the more as a preacher because he was a king. If men of honour would lay out themselves to do good, what a great deal of good might they do! Solomon looked as great in the pulpit, preaching the vanity of the world, as in his throne of ivory, judging.
The Chaldee-paraphrase (which, in this book, makes very large additions to the text, or comments upon it, all along) gives this account of Solomon's writing this book, That by the spirit of prophecy he foresaw the revolt of the ten tribes from his son, and, in process of time, the destruction of Jerusalem and the house of the sanctuary, and the captivity of the people, in the foresight of which he said, Vanity of vanities, all is vanity; and to that he applies many passages in this book.
II.The general scope and design of the book.
What is it that this royal preacher has to say? That which he aims at is, for the making of us truly religious, to take down our esteem of and expectation from the things of this world. In order to this, he shows,
1.That they are all vanity, Ecclesiastes 1:2. This is the proposition he lays down and undertakes to prove: Vanity of vanities, all is vanity. It was no new text; his father David had more than once spoken to the same purport. The truth itself here asserted is, that all is vanity, all besides God and considered as abstract from him, the all of this world, all worldly employments and enjoyments, the all that is in the world (1 John 2:16), all that which is agreeable to our senses and to our fancies in this present state, which gains pleasure to ourselves or reputation with others. It is all vanity, not only in the abuse of it, when it is perverted by the sin of man, but even in the use of it. Man, considered with reference to these things, is vanity (Psalm 39:5, Psalm 39:6), and, if there were not another life after this, were made in vain (Psalm 89:47); and those things, considered in reference to man (whatever they are in themselves), are vanity. They are impertinent to the soul, foreign, and add nothing to it; they do not answer the end, nor yield any true satisfaction; they are uncertain in their continuance, are fading, and perishing, and passing away, and will certainly deceive and disappoint those that put a confidence in them. Let us not therefore love vanity (Psalm 4:2), nor lift up our souls to it (Psalm 24:4), for we shall but weary ourselves for it, Hebrews 2:13. It is expressed here very emphatically; not only, All is vain, but in the abstract, All is vanity; as if vanity were the proprium quarto modo - property in the fourth mode, of the things of this world, that which enters into the nature of them. The are not only vanity, but vanity of vanities, the vainest vanity, vanity in the highest degree, nothing but vanity, such a vanity as is the cause of a great deal of vanity. And this is redoubled, because the thing is certain and past dispute, it is vanity of vanities. This intimates that the wise man had his own heart fully convinced of and much affected with this truth, and that he was very desirous that others should be convinced of it and affected with it, as he was, but that he found the generality of men very loth to believe it and consider it (Job 33:14); it intimates likewise that we cannot comprehend and express the vanity of this world. But who is it that speaks thus slightly of the world? Is it one that will stand to what he says? Yes, he puts his name to it - saith the preacher. Is it one that was a competent judge? Yes, as much as ever any man was. Many speak contemptuously of the world because they are hermits, and know it not, or beggars, and have it not; but Solomon knew it. He had dived into nature's depths (1 Kings 4:33), and he had it, more of it perhaps than ever any man had, his head filled with its notions and his belly with its hidden treasures (Psalm 17:14), and he passes this judgment on it. But did he speak as one having authority? Yes, not only that of a king, but that of a prophet, a preacher; he spoke in God's name, and was divinely inspired to say it. But did he not say it in his haste, or in a passion, upon occasion of some particular disappointment? No; he said it deliberately, said it and proved it, laid it down as a fundamental principle, on which he grounded the necessity of being religious. And, as some think, one main thing he designed was to show that the everlasting throne and kingdom which God had by Nathan promised to David and his seed must be of another world; for all things in this world are subject to vanity, and therefore have not in them sufficient to answer the extent of that promise. If Solomon find all to be vanity, then the kingdom of the Messiah must come, in which we shall inherit substance.
2.That they are insufficient to make us happy. And for this he appeals to men's consciences: What profit has a man of all the pains he takes? Ecclesiastes 1:3. Observe here,
(1.)The business of this world described. It is labour; the word signifies both care and toil. It is work that wearies men. There is a constant fatigue in worldly business. It is labour under the sun; that is a phrase peculiar to this book, where we meet with it twenty-eight times. There is a world above the sun, a world which needs not the sun, for the glory of God is its light, where there is work without labour and with great profit, the work of angels; but he speaks of the work under the sun, the pains of which are great and the gains little. It is under the sun, under the influence of the sun, by its light and in its heat; as we have the benefit of the light of the day, so we have sometimes the burden and heat of the day (Matthew 20:12), and therefore in the sweat of our face we eat bread. In the dark and cold grave the weary are at rest.
(2.)The benefit of that business enquired into: What profit has a man of all that labour? Solomon says (Proverbs 14:23), In all labour there is profit; and yet here he denies that there is any profit. As to our present condition in the world, it is true that by labour we get that which we call profit; we eat the labour of our hands; but as the wealth of the world is commonly called substance, and yet it is that which is not (Proverbs 22:5), so it is called profit, but the question is whether it be really so or no. And here he determines that it is not, that it is not a real benefit, that it is not a remaining benefit. In short, the wealth and pleasure of this world, if we had ever so much of them, are not sufficient to make us happy, nor will they be a portion for us.
[1.]As to the body, and the life that now is, What profit has a man of all his labour? A man's life consists not in an abundance, Luke 12:15. As goods are increased care about them is increased, and those are increased that eat of them, and a little thing will embitter all the comfort of them; and then what profit has a man of all his labour? Early up, and never the nearer.
[2.]As to the soul, and the life that is to come, we may much more truly say, What profit has a man of all his labour? All he gets by it will not supply the wants of the soul, nor satisfy its desires, will not atone for the sin of the soul, nor cure its diseases, nor contervail the loss of it; what profit will they be of to the soul in death, in judgment, or in the everlasting state? The fruit of our labour in heavenly things is meat that endures to eternal life, but the fruit of our labour for the world is only meat that perishes.
Historical interpretation
Two Centuries of Reception
11 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Let us see what is the “vanity” to which the creation was subjected. My own opinion is, that this is nothing else than the possession of bodies, for even though the stars are composed of ether they are nevertheless material. This, it seems to me, is the reason why Solomon arraigns the whole bodily universe as being in a way burdensome and as impeding the activity of spirits, thus: “Vanity of vanities, all is vanity, said the Preacher; all is vanity.” “For,” he adds, “I looked and I saw all things that are under the sun, and behold, all is vanity.”
Vanity may be described as something which lacks existence but exists only in the utterance of this word. The reality behind the word is nonexistent; only the letters transmit a useless, empty sound. These meaningless sounds randomly strike the ear as in a game when we create names which lack meaning. This is one form of vanity. Another refers to persons who zealously accumulate objects with no goal in mind. For example, children’s sand buildings, the shooting at stars with arrows, trapping the wind and racing with one’s shadow while trying to reach its head. If we take another example, we see that they all fall under the term “vanity.” Often human custom calls vanity the looking towards a goal and the pursuit of something profitable; should a person do something contrary or foolish, he invests his energy to no avail. This is too is called vanity.… [And] so “vanity of vanities” demonstrates the incomparable excess of vanity.
The insubstantial is deemed “futile,” that which has existence only in the utterance of the word. No substantial object is simultaneously indicated when the term is used, but it is a kind of idle and empty sound, expressed by syllables in the form of a word, striking the ear at random without meaning, the sort of word people make up for a joke but which means nothing. This then is one sort of futility. Another sense of “futility” is the pointlessness of things done earnestly to no purpose, like the sandcastles children build, and shooting arrows at stars, and chasing the winds, and racing against one’s own shadow and trying to step on its head, and anything else of the same kind which we find done pointlessly. All these activities are included in the meaning of “futility.” … [And] so also “futility of futilities” indicates the absolute extreme of what is futile.
David, who had experienced those very glances which are dangerous for a man, aptly says that the person is blessed whose every hope is in the name of God. For such a one does not have regard to vanities and follies who always strives toward Christ and always looks upon Christ with his inner eyes. For this reason David turned to God again and said, “Turn away my eyes, that they may not see vanity.” The circus is vanity, because it is totally without profit; horse racing is vanity, because it is counterfeit as regards salvation; the theater is vanity, every game is vanity. “All things are vanity!” as Ecclesiastes said, all things that are in this world. Accordingly, let the person who wishes to be saved ascend above the world, let him seek the Word who is with God, let him flee from this world and depart from the earth. For a man cannot comprehend that which exists and exists always, unless he has first fled from here.
There is a difference between vanities; there are those that are especially so, and others that are not.…Question: [Does Ecclesiastes speak] about one and the same [kind of vanity]?
Answer: About both, about the things that are just vanity as well as about those that are a vanity of vanities. Both the things that most clearly belong to the sphere of vanity and the less obvious vanities are altogether vain in comparison with actual truth. The newborn, the little child and the boy are imperfect. Of course, they are imperfect in comparison with an adolescent, and they are all imperfect in comparison with a man.…
Question: Does he not mean by “vanity of vanities” the visible and the perceivable?
Answer: Yes, but the layperson and the astronomer do not perceive the sun in the same way. The perception of the sun by an astronomer and by a scientist is far inferior to the seeing of the invisible God and it is inferior to the knowledge that comes from God.
To those who have entered into the church of the mind and marvel in contemplation of what has come into being, the text says, Do not think that this is the ultimate end or that these are the promises that have been stored up for you. For all these things are [only] vanity of vanities before the knowledge of one’s God. For, just as it is futile for medicine [to seek] a final cure, so is it useless [to seek] after knowledge of the Holy Trinity in the ideas of the [present] ages and worlds.
What is vanity of mind? It is the being busied about vain things. And what are those vain things, but all things in the present life? Of them the Preacher says, “Vanity of vanities, all is vanity.” But a person will say, If they be vain and vanity, for what purpose were they made? If they are God’s works, how are they vain? And great is the dispute concerning these things. But listen, beloved: it is not the works of God that he calls vain; God forbid! The heaven is not vain, the earth is not vain—God forbid!—nor the sun, nor the moon and stars, nor our own body. No, all these are “very good.” But what is vain? Let us hear the Preacher himself, what he says: “I planted vineyards, I got men singers and women singers, I made pools of water, I had great possessions of herds and flocks, I gathered me also silver and gold, and I saw that these are vanity.”
"Vanity of vanities" said Ecclesiastes", Vanity of vanities, all is vanity." If all things that God made are truly good
then how can all things be considered vanity, and not only vanity, but even
vanity of vanities? Just as Song of
Songs means a song that stands out from amongst all songs, so we see that in
"vanity of vanities" the degree of vanity is shown. It is also written similarly in Psalm 38.6:
"Nevertheless every living man is vanity." If living man is vanity then a dead man must
be vanity of vanities. We read in Exodus
that Moses' face is glorified so much that the children of Israel are not able
to see him [Cfr Ex. 34, 30-35.]. Paul the apostle said that his glory was not
really glory when compared to the glory of righteousness: "For even that
which was made glorious had no glory in this respect, by reason of the glory
that excelleth." [II Cor. 3, 10.] We are therefore able to say that even we in
this respect, heaven, earth, the seas and all things that are contained within
its compass can be said to be good in themselves, but compared to God they are
nothing. And if I look at the candle in
a lamp and am content with its light, then afterwards when the sun has risen I
cannot discern anymore what was once bright; I will also see the light of the
stars by the light of the setting sun, so in looking at the world and the
multitudinous varieties of nature I am amazed at the greatness of the world,
but I also remember that all things will pass away and the world will grow old,
and that only God is that which has always been. On account of this realisation I am compelled
to say, not once but twice: Vanity of
vanities, all is vanity. Instead of
"vanity of vanities" the Hebrew text reads 'abal abalim' which all
manuscripts excepting that of the Septuagint translate similarly in Greek as "atmos atmidon "or" atmon "which we are able to translate as 'a breath' and 'a light
wind which is quickly dispersed'. In
this way it is shown to be vain and in no way universal by this phrase. For those things which seem to be temporal,
in fact are; but those which do not are eternal. Or since that which will give rise to vanity
has been exposed, he groans and is anxious and awaits the revelation of the
sons of God, and "now we know in part, and we prophesy in part" [I Cor. 13, 9.]. All things are and will be vain, until we
find that which is complete and perfect.
If everything that God made is very good, then how can everything be vanity—and not only vanity, but even vanity of vanities? As one song in the Song of Songs is shown to excel above all songs, so also is the magnitude of vanity demonstrated by the expression “vanity of vanities.”
By this perversity of the soul, due to sin and punishment, the whole corporeal creation becomes, as Solomon says: “Vanity of them that are vain, all is vanity. What advantage has man in all his labor which he does under the sun?” Not for nothing does he say, “of them that are vain,” for if you take away vain persons who pursue that which is last as if it were first, matter will not be vanity but will show its own beauty in its own way, a low type of beauty, of course, but not deceptive. When man fell away from the unity of God the multitude of temporal forms was distributed among his carnal senses, and his sensibilities were multiplied by the changeful variety. So abundance became laborious, and his needs, if one may say so, became abundant, for he pursues one thing after another, and nothing remains permanently with him. So what with his corn and wine and oil, his needs are so multiplied that he cannot find the one thing needful, a single and unchangeable nature, seeking which he would not err and attaining which he would cease from grief and pain. For then he would have as a consequence the redemption of his body, which no longer would be corrupted. As it is, the corruption of the body burdens the soul, and its earthly habitation forces it to think of many things; for the humble beauty of material objects is hurried along in the order in which one thing succeeds another. The reason why corporeal beauty is the lowest beauty is that its parts cannot all exist simultaneously. Some things give place and others succeed them, and all together complete the number of temporal forms and make of them a single beauty.
What is that vanity, if not devotion to riches and the pursuit of worldly pleasures? This is confirmed through Solomon, who says, “Vanity of vanities, and all is vanity.” Therefore, dearly beloved, let no one put his confidence in the vanity of this world. That vanity, as you see, is something standing with insecure footing. Devotion to it is short-lived and empty, and its beauty is like smoke in a wind. The comeliness of its countenance is like that which you see when you look on the beauty of that vine which had its early summer blossoms in well-constituted abundance yet cannot bring forth the actual fruit of the promised grape harvest. While it brings forth too much, it incurs the reproach of perpetual sterility.
Continue studying Ecclesiastes 1:2 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
The Preacher’s opening cry declares that everything in this life is vanity of vanities, utterly fleeting and empty like a breath when it is sought for its own sake.
“Vanity of vanities,”
Hebel is breath or vapour, and so futility, something fleeting and unsatisfying. Doubled, it is a superlative: utter vanity.
“saith the Preacher,”
ʼÂmar is the plain verb for saying. The force of the verse comes from the words he says and from the man who says them.
“vanity of vanities; all is vanity.”
The cry is repeated and then widened to everything under the sun, every pursuit sought as an end in itself. The book’s last word on it is to fear God and keep his commandments (Ecclesiastes 12:13–14).
Passage studyEcclesiastes 1:1–3
Vanity of Vanities, Saith the Preacher
Summary
Ecclesiastes opens by naming its speaker, the Preacher, the son of David and king in Jerusalem, a man who had every wisdom, wealth and power this world can give. His first words are his verdict on all of it: “Vanity of vanities; all is vanity.” Then he asks the question his whole book explores: what lasting profit does a man have from all his toil under the sun? These three verses tell us honestly how fleeting earthly life and labour are, and the book they open leads us to fear God, who alone gives our lives and our work a worth that lasts. In Christ, the greater Son of David, that answer is complete.
Who is the Preacher, the son of David?
The first verse works like a title page, naming whose words follow. “The words” translates dâbâr, which means word or speech, and in a separate sense a matter, affair or thing. Here it stands for the Preacher’s teaching as a whole, the body of observations and conclusions about life that fill the book.
“The Preacher” is qôheleth, a title unique to this book. It comes from a root meaning to assemble or gather, and in form it is a feminine participle, “one who assembles”, though it names a man. The feminine may point to an office or role, the work of teaching. The title fits both sides of what he does. He gathers people to hear him, as a lecturer or speaker, and he gathers wisdom, sayings and experience to set before them. The Hebrew title, Koheleth, is used as the speaker’s pen name, and English Bibles render it “the Preacher”.
He is “the son of David”, bên meaning son, and “king in Jerusalem”. Together these titles point to Solomon, David’s son, who reigned over Israel from Jerusalem from about 970 to 931 BC. God gave Solomon wisdom and largeness of heart, and his fame spread to the nations round about (1 Kings 4:29–34). His reign was a time of peace and prosperity, and he built the temple in Jerusalem (1 Kings 6). The book of Proverbs opens in almost the same words: “The proverbs of Solomon the son of David, king of Israel” (Proverbs 1:1).
This gives weight to all that follows. The man about to call everything vanity had wisdom, wealth, power and pleasure in full measure, in the capital city of God’s people. When he weighs life under the sun and finds it wanting, he speaks from the height of human achievement, as one who has seen it all. If a king of his standing still had to search for lasting meaning, every one of us shares that longing.
Did Solomon write Ecclesiastes?
The book names its speaker only by his titles, and it has long been received as Solomon’s words. Believers differ on how to take that. Some hold that Solomon wrote it himself, out of his own testing of everything his wealth and wisdom could reach. Others hold that a later wise man of Israel, writing perhaps after the exile, spoke in Solomon’s voice as the Preacher, and they point to features of the book’s language. On either reading these are God’s words, and the Preacher speaks with the authority of a king who knew wisdom and had tasted all the world could offer.
Vanity of vanities
The Preacher’s first words after his title are the thesis of the whole book. “Vanity” translates hebel, whose base sense is breath or vapour. In Scripture it almost always carries a figurative sense: futility, something transitory and unsatisfactory, and sometimes a worthless idol. The picture behind it is something that looks substantial for a moment and then is gone, like a breath, leaving nothing behind.
“Vanity of vanities”, hebel hebalim, is the Hebrew way of forming a superlative, as “Holy of Holies” means the holiest place. So the phrase means utter vanity, the uttermost futility. The Preacher says it twice and then widens it to everything: “all is vanity.” Every human endeavour, achievement, pleasure and pursuit under the sun comes under that word when it is sought as an end in itself.
“Saith” is ʼâmar, the ordinary verb for saying, which can also mean to tell or to command. The weight of the verse lies in what he says. He states a conclusion drawn from long observation and experience, and the chapters that follow show how he reached it, as he tests wisdom, pleasure, wealth, toil and power one after another and finds that none of them gives lasting satisfaction.
Other Scripture speaks of man’s life in the same way. David prays, “verily every man at his best state is altogether vanity” (Psalm 39:5). Isaiah sets the passing of all flesh against what lasts: “The grass withereth, the flower fadeth: but the word of our God shall stand for ever” (Isaiah 40:6–8). Paul counts everything that was gain to him as loss for Christ (Philippians 3:7–8). And Paul also writes, in the KJV’s English word, that “the creature was made subject to vanity”, so that the whole creation groans as it waits for its deliverance (Romans 8:20–22). The emptiness the Preacher sees belongs to a world estranged from its Creator.
Is Ecclesiastes a pessimistic book?
Ecclesiastes is honest, and its honesty leads somewhere good. The Preacher tells the truth about the limits of life when it is weighed by earthly measures alone, and he shows how empty it is to look for final satisfaction in anything apart from God. That sobering verdict clears the way for the book’s conclusion: “Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man. For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil” (Ecclesiastes 12:13–14).
So “all is vanity” is a hard truth meant to turn us toward God. The Preacher is realistic about this world in order to point beyond it, and the book’s dark tone serves that purpose. It calls us to look past the created to the Creator for our purpose.
What profit hath a man of all his labour?
Verse 3 turns the declaration into a question, the one the Preacher pursues through the rest of the book. “Profit” is yithrôwn, from a root meaning to be preeminent or to gain. It has a ring of trade about it: surplus, net gain, advantage, what is left on the balance when all the costs are paid. The Preacher is asking what lasting return a person has after spending effort, years and life itself.
“A man” is ʼâdâm, a human being, or humanity as a whole. The question concerns every person, because labour and striving are common to us all. “Labour” is ʻâmâl, toil and wearing effort, and also worry and grief. It is work that wears down the body and the mind, the long and often frustrating striving that fills so much of human life.
In Israel, hard work, wealth and wisdom were rightly esteemed, and people expected them to lead to a good life. The Preacher presses further and asks whether any of them yields lasting happiness or an enduring legacy. He asks it as a rhetorical question, and later he gives his own answer after testing his great works: “Then I looked on all the works that my hands had wrought, and on the labour that I had laboured to do: and, behold, all was vanity and vexation of spirit, and there was no profit under the sun” (Ecclesiastes 2:11). A psalm makes the same point about wealth, for wise men die and leave their riches to others, and “man being in honour abideth not” (Psalm 49:10–12). The verses that follow this one describe the wearying rounds of life and nature that keep turning while nothing truly changes (Ecclesiastes 1:3–11).
What does “under the sun” mean?
“Under the sun” marks out the Preacher’s field of view: life as it is lived and seen on the earth, everything that happens in this passing, material world. The phrase is a hallmark of Ecclesiastes and comes almost thirty times. He uses it of what he watches: “there is no new thing under the sun” (Ecclesiastes 1:9), and “I saw under the sun the place of judgment, that wickedness was there” (Ecclesiastes 3:16). Within those limits, judged by what human eyes can see, our labour leaves no surplus that lasts, and its frustrations stand out. Each time the phrase returns, it reminds us of the edge of the Preacher’s view, and that the lasting answer must come from the God who is above the sun.
Christ, the greater Son of David
A son of David who reigned in Jerusalem and searched for lasting meaning points us to the true Son of David. Matthew opens his Gospel with “The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David” (Matthew 1:1), and Jesus reigns as King over all creation. The Preacher’s wisdom was vast, yet it showed the need for something beyond human reach. Christ is “the power of God, and the wisdom of God” (1 Corinthians 1:24), the one “in whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge” (Colossians 2:3). God has made him unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption (1 Corinthians 1:30). He is the Word who was with God in the beginning and by whom all things were made (John 1:1–3), and he says, “I am the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6).
Earthly kingdoms pass away, but Jesus says, “My kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36), and his reign is free of the decay that marks them. Against the breath-like pleasures of this world he offers living water: “whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst” (John 4:13–14).
Jesus also asks a question about profit, and it carries the Preacher’s question to its deepest point: “For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?” (Matthew 16:26). He measures gain by the eternal destiny of the soul. And Paul gives believers the answer to verse 3: “your labour is not in vain in the Lord” (1 Corinthians 15:58). Work done in Christ and for his glory becomes service with eternal worth. Its reward is “an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away” (1 Peter 1:4), and “a crown of glory that fadeth not away” (1 Peter 5:4), a true and lasting profit that nothing under the sun can supply.
Labour that lasts
These verses give us a true account of the world. The things our age urges us to gather, wealth, status, power and even knowledge, pass like a breath when they are chased for their own sake, and a king who had them all says so plainly. That truth is a kindness, because it frees us from a treadmill that never ends.
The same book that calls all things vanity goes on to point us to the God who gives them, so that his gifts, even the plain ones of daily life, can be received with joy. In Christ our work has a purpose that reaches past the sun, and the Lord who calls us to fear him has promised that labour done for him is never lost. On that foundation a life is built that will not dissipate like breath.
Ecclesiastes 1:1
“The words”
Dâbâr, word or speech, here the Preacher’s whole teaching gathered into one book.
“of the Preacher,”
Qôheleth, the one who assembles, a teacher who gathers hearers and gathers wisdom to give them. The form is feminine, though it names a man, and may point to his office.
“the son of David,”
Bên, son. With the next phrase it points to Solomon, and the same pairing opens Proverbs (Proverbs 1:1).
“king in Jerusalem.”
He speaks from the seat of Israel’s power, with access to everything the world could give, which is why his verdict on it carries such weight.
Ecclesiastes 1:2 This verse
“Vanity of vanities,”
Hebel is breath or vapour, and so futility, something fleeting and unsatisfying. Doubled, it is a superlative: utter vanity.
“saith the Preacher,”
ʼÂmar is the plain verb for saying. The force of the verse comes from the words he says and from the man who says them.
“vanity of vanities; all is vanity.”
The cry is repeated and then widened to everything under the sun, every pursuit sought as an end in itself. The book’s last word on it is to fear God and keep his commandments (Ecclesiastes 12:13–14).
Ecclesiastes 1:3
“What profit hath a man”
Yithrôwn is surplus or net gain, what is left over after all the cost. ʼÂdâm makes the question one for every human being. The question expects the reader to see that there is no lasting gain within the world’s own terms (Ecclesiastes 2:11).
“of all his labour”
ʻÂmâl is toil that wearies, with worry and grief in it, the burdensome striving of daily life.
“which he taketh under the sun?”
The book’s recurring phrase for life as it is lived and seen on earth. Jesus asks a deeper question of profit, measured by the soul (Matthew 16:26), and in the Lord our labour is not in vain (1 Corinthians 15:58).
Last revised