Psalm 78:10
“The Failure of Ephraim”Psalm 78:9–11
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- לֹאlo'notH3808NegParticle Negative
- שָׁמְרוּSham·ruthey keptH8104V-Qal-Perf-3cpVerb Qal Perfect 3rd Plural common gender
- בְּרִיתbe·Rit[the] covenant ofH1285N-fscNoun Singular Feminine Construct
- אֱלֹהִים'E·lo·HimGodH430N-mpNoun Plural Masculine Absolute
- וּבְתוֹרָתוֹu·ve·to·ra·Toand in his lawH8451Conj-w ¦ Prep-b ¦ N-fsc ¦ 3msNoun Singular Feminine Construct with suffixוּandבְinתוֹרָתlawוֹhis
- מֵאֲנוּme·'a·Nuthey refusedH3985V-Piel-Perf-3cpVerb Piel Perfect 3rd Plural common gender
- לָלֶכֶתla·Le·khetto walkH1980Prep-l ¦ V-Qal-InfVerb Qal Infinitive Constructלָtoלֶכֶתwalk
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Psalm 78:9–39. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
In these verses,
I.The psalmist observes the late rebukes of Providence that the people of Israel had been under, which they had brought upon themselves by their dealing treacherously with God, Psalm 78:9-11. The children of Ephraim, in which tribe Shiloh was, though they were well armed and shot with bows, yet turned back in the day of battle. This seems to refer to that shameful defeat which the Philistines gave them in Eli's time, when they took the ark prisoner, 1 Samuel 4:10, 1 Samuel 4:11. Of this the psalmist here begins to speak, and, after a long digression, returns to it again, Psalm 78:61. Well might that event be thus fresh in mind in David's time, above forty years after, for the ark, which in that memorable battle was seized by the Philistines, though it was quickly brought out of captivity, was never brought out of obscurity till David fetched it from Kirjath-jearim to his own city. Observe,
1.The shameful cowardice of the children of Ephraim, that warlike tribe, so famed for valiant men, Joshua's tribe; the children of that tribe, though as well armed as ever, turned back when they came to face the enemy. Note, Weapons of war stand men in little stead without a martial spirit, and that is gone if God be gone. Sin dispirits men and takes away the heart.
2.The causes of their cowardice, which were no less shameful; and these were,
(1.)A shameful violation of God's law and their covenant with him (Psalm 78:10); they were basely treacherous and perfidious, for they kept not the covenant of God, and basely stubborn and rebellious (as they were described, Psalm 78:8), for they peremptorily refused to walk in his law, and, in effect, told him to his face they would not be ruled by him.
(2.)A shameful ingratitude to God for the favours he had bestowed upon them: They forgot his works and his wonders, his works of wonder which they ought to have admired, Psalm 78:11. Note, Our forgetfulness of God's works is at the bottom of our disobedience to his laws.
II.He takes occasion hence to consult precedents and to compare this with the case of their fathers, who were in like manner unmindful of God's mercies to them and ungrateful to their founder and great benefactor, and were therefore often brought under his displeasure. The narrative in these verses is very remarkable, for it relates a kind of struggle between God's goodness and man's badness, and mercy, at length, rejoices against judgment.
1.God did great things for his people Israel when he first incorporated them and formed them into a people: Marvellous things did he in the sight of their fathers, and not only in their sight, but in their cause, and for their benefit, so strange, so kind, that one would think they should never be forgotten. What he did for them in the land of Egypt is only just mentioned here (Psalm 78:12), but afterwards resumed, Psalm 78:43. He proceeds here to show,
(1.)How he made a lane for them through the Red Sea, and caused them, gave them courage, to pass through, though the waters stood over their heads as a heap, Psalm 78:13. See Isaiah 63:12, Isaiah 63:13, where God is said to lead them by the hand, as it were, through the deep that they should not stumble.
(2.)How he provided a guide for them through the untrodden paths of the wilderness (Psalm 78:14); he led them step by step, in the day time by a cloud, which also sheltered them from the heat, and all the night with a light of fire, which perhaps warmed the air; at least it made the darkness of night less frightful, and perhaps kept off wild beasts, Zechariah 2:5.
(3.)How he furnished their camp with fresh water in a dry and thirsty land where no water was, not by opening the bottles of heaven (that would have been a common way), but by broaching a rock (Psalm 78:15, Psalm 78:16): He clave the rocks in the wilderness, which yielded water, though they were not capable of receiving it either from the clouds above or the springs beneath. Out of the dry and hard rock he gave them drink, not distilled as out of an alembic, drop by drop, but in streams running down like rivers, and as out of the great depths. God gives abundantly, and is rich in mercy; he gives seasonably, and sometimes makes us to feel the want of mercies that we may the better know the worth of them. This water which God gave Israel out of the rock was the more valuable because it was spiritual drink. And that rock was Christ.
2.When God began thus to bless them they began to affront him (Psalm 78:17): They sinned yet more against him, more than they had done in Egypt, though there they were bad enough, Ezekiel 20:8. They bore the miseries of their servitude better than the difficulties of their deliverance, and never murmured at their taskmasters so much as they did at Moses and Aaron; as if they were delivered to do all these abominations, Jeremiah 7:10. As sin sometimes takes occasion by the commandment, so at other times it takes occasion by the deliverance, to become more exceedingly sinful. They provoked the Most High. Though he is most high, and they knew themselves an unequal match for him, yet they provoked him and even bade defiance to his justice; and this in the wilderness, where he had them at his mercy and therefore they were bound in interest to please him, and where he showed them so much mercy and therefore they were bound in gratitude to please him; yet there they said and did that which they knew would provoke him: They tempted God in their heart, Psalm 78:18. Their sin began in their heart, and thence it took its malignity. They do always err in their heart, Hebrews 3:10. Thus they tempted God, tried his patience to the utmost, whether he would bear with them or no, and, in effect, bade him do his worst. Two ways they provoked him: - (1.) By desiring, or rather demanding, that which he had not thought fit to give them: They asked meat for their lust. God had given them meat for their hunger, in the manna, wholesome pleasant food and in abundance; he had given them meat for their faith out of the heads of leviathan which he broke in pieces, Psalm 74:14. But all this would not serve; they must have meat for their lust, dainties and varieties to gratify a luxurious appetite. Nothing is more provoking to God than our quarrelling with our allotment and indulging the desires of the flesh. (2.) By distrusting his power to give them what they desired. This was tempting God indeed. They challenged him to give them flesh; and, if he did not, they would say it was because he could not, not because he did not see it fit for them (Psalm 78:19): They spoke against God. Those that set bounds to God's power speak against him. It was as injurious a reflection as could be cat upon God to say, Can God furnish a table in the wilderness? They had manna, but the did not think they had a table furnished unless they had boiled and roast, a first, a second, and a third course, as they had in Egypt, where they had both flesh and fish, and sauce too (Exodus 16:3, Numbers 11:5), dishes of meat and salvers of fruit. What an unreasonable insatiable thin is luxury! Such a mighty thing did these epicures think a table well furnished to be that they thought it was more than God himself could give them in that wilderness; whereas the beasts of the forest, and all the fowls of the mountains, are his, Psalm 50:10, Psalm 50:11. Their disbelief of God's power was so much the worse in that they did at the same time own that he had done as much as that came to (Psalm 78:20): Behold, he smote the rock, that the waters gushed out, which they and their cattle drank of. And which is easier, to furnish a table in the wilderness, which a rich man can do, or to fetch water out of a rock, which the greatest potentate on the earth cannot do? Never did unbelief, though always unreasonable, ask so absurd a question: "Can he that melted down a rock into streams of water give bread also? Or can he that has given bread provide flesh also?" Is any thing too hard for Omnipotence? When once the ordinary powers of nature are exceeded God has made bare his arm, and we must conclude that nothing is impossible with him. Be it ever so great a thing that we ask, it becomes us to own, Lord, if thou wilt, thou canst.
3.God justly resented the provocation and was much displeased with them (Psalm 78:21): The Lord heard this, and was wroth. Note, God is a witness to all our murmurings and distrusts; he hears them and is much displeased with them. A fire was kindled for this against Jacob; the fire of the Lord burnt among them, Numbers 11:1. Or it may be understood of the fire of God's anger which came up against Israel. To unbelievers our God is himself a consuming fire. Those that will not believe the power of God's mercy shall feel the power of his indignation, and be made to confess that it is a fearful thing to fall into his hands. Now here we are told,
(1.)Why God thus resented the provocation (Psalm 78:22): Because by this it appeared that they believed not in God; they did not give credit to the revelation he had made of himself to them, for they durst not commit themselves to him, nor venture themselves with him: They trusted not in the salvation he had begun to work for them; for then they would not thus have questioned its progress. Those cannot be said to trust in God's salvation as their felicity at last who cannot find in their hearts to trust in his providence for food convenient in the way to it. That which aggravated their unbelief was the experience they had had of the power and goodness of God, Psalm 78:23-25. He had given them undeniable proofs of his power, not only on earth beneath, but in heaven above; for he commanded the clouds from above, as one that had created them and commanded them into being; he made what use he pleased of them. Usually by their showers they contribute to the earth's producing corn; but now, when God so commanded them, they showered down corn themselves, which is therefore called here the corn of heaven; for heaven can do the work without the earth, but not the earth without heaven. God, who has the key of the clouds, opened the doors of heaven, and that is more than opening the windows, which yet is spoken of as a great blessing, Malachi 3:10. To all that by faith and prayer ask, seek, and knock, these doors shall at any time be opened; for the God of heaven is rich in mercy to all that call upon him. He not only keeps a good house, but keeps open house. Justly might God take it ill that they should distrust him when he had been so very kind to them that he had rained down manna upon them to eat, substantial food, daily, duly, enough for all, enough for each. Man did eat angels' food, such as angels, if they had occasion for food, would eat and be thankful for; or rather such as was given by the ministry of angels, and (as the Chaldee reads it) such as descended from the dwelling of angels. Every one, even the least child in Israel, did eat the bread of the mighty (so the margin reads it); the weakest stomach could digest it, and yet it was so nourishing that it was strong meat for strong men. And, though the provision was so good, yet they were not stinted, nor ever reduced to short allowance; for he sent them meat to the full. If they gathered little, it was their own fault; and yet even then they had no lack, Exodus 16:18. The daily provision God makes for us, and has made ever since we came into the world, though it has not so much of miracle as this, has no less of mercy, and is therefore a great aggravation of our distrust of God.
(2.)How he expressed his resentment of the provocation, not in denying them what they so inordinately lusted after, but in granting it to them.
[1.]Did they question his power? He soon gave them a sensible conviction that he could furnish a table in the wilderness. Though the winds seem to blow where they list, yet, when he pleased, he could make them his caterers to fetch in provisions, Psalm 78:26. He caused an east wind to blow and a south wind, either a south-east wind, or an east wind first to bring in the quails from that quarter and then a south wind to bring in more from that quarter; so that he rained flesh upon them, and that of the most delicate sort, not butchers' meat, but wild-fowl, and abundance of it, as dust, as the sand of the sea (Psalm 78:27), so that the meanest Israelite might have sufficient; and it cost them nothing, no, not the pains of fetching it from the mountains, for he let it fall in the midst of their camp, round about their habitation, Psalm 78:28. We have the account Numbers 11:31, Numbers 11:32. See how good God is even to the evil and unthankful, and wonder that his goodness does not overcome their badness. See what little reason we have to judge of God's love by such gifts of his bounty as these; dainty bits are no tokens of his peculiar favour. Christ gave dry bread to the disciples that he loved, but a sop dipped in the sauce to Judas that betrayed him.
[2.]Did they defy his justice and boast that they had gained their point? He made them pay dearly for their quails; for, though he gave them their own desire, they were not estranged from their lust (Psalm 78:29, Psalm 78:30); their appetite was insatiable; they were well filled and yet they were not satisfied; for they knew not what they would have. Such is the nature of lust; it is content with nothing, and the more it is humoured the more humoursome it grows. Those that indulge their lust will never be estranged from it. Or it intimates that God's liberality did not make them ashamed of their ungrateful lustings, as it would have done if they had had any sense of honour. But what came of it? While the meat was yet in their mouth, rolled under the tongue as a sweet morsel, the wrath of God came upon them and slew the fattest of them (Psalm 78:31), those that were most luxurious and most daring. See Numbers 11:33, Numbers 11:34. They were fed as sheep for the slaughter: the butcher takes the fattest first. We may suppose there were some pious and contented Israelites, that did eat moderately of the quails and were never the worse; for it was not the meat that poisoned them, but their own lust. Let epicures and sensualists here read their doom. The end of those who make a god of their belly is destruction, Philippians 3:19. The prosperity of fools shall destroy them, and their ruin will be the greater.
4.The judgments of God upon them did not reform them, nor attain the end, any more than his mercies (Psalm 78:32): For all this, they sinned still; they murmured and quarrelled with God and Moses as much as ever. Though God was wroth and smote them, yet they went on frowardly in the way of their heart (Isaiah 57:17); they believed not for his wondrous works. Though his works of justice were as wondrous and as great proofs of his power as his works of mercy, yet they were not wrought upon by them to fear God, nor convinced how much it was their interest to make him their friend. Those hearts are hard indeed that will neither be melted by the mercies of God nor broken by his judgments.
5.They persisting in their sins, God proceeded in his judgments, but they were judgments of another nature, which wrought not suddenly, but slowly. He punished them not now with such acute diseases as that was which slew the fattest of them, but a lingering chronical distemper (Psalm 78:33): Therefore their days did he consume in vanity in the wilderness and their years in trouble. By an irreversible doom they were condemned to wear out thirty-eight tedious years in the wilderness, which indeed were consumed in vanity; for in all those years there was not a step taken nearer Canaan, but they were turned back again, and wandered to and fro as in a labyrinth, not one stroke struck towards the conquest of it: and not only in vanity, but in trouble, for their carcases were condemned to fall in the wilderness and there they all perished but Caleb and Joshua. Note, Those that sin still must expect to be in trouble still. And the reason why we spend our days in so much vanity and trouble, why we live with so little comfort and to so little purpose, is because we do not live by faith.
6.Under these rebukes they professed repentance, but they were not cordial and sincere in this profession.
(1.)Their profession was plausible enough (Psalm 78:34, Psalm 78:35): When he slew them, or condemned them to be slain, then they sought him; they confessed their fault, and begged his pardon. When some were slain others in a fright cried to God for mercy, and promised they would reform and be very good; then they returned to God, and enquired early after him. So one would have taken them to be such as desired to find him. And they pretended to do this because, however they had forgotten it formerly, now they remembered that God was their rock and therefore now that they needed him they would fly to him and take shelter in him, and that the high God was their Redeemer, who brought them out of Egypt and to whom therefore they might come with boldness. Afflictions are sent to put us in mind of God as our rock and our redeemer; for, in prosperity, we are apt to forget him.
(2.)They were not sincere in this profession (Psalm 78:36, Psalm 78:37): They did but flatter him with their mouth, as if they thought by fair speeches to prevail with him to revoke the sentence and remove the judgment, with a secret intention to break their word when the danger was over; they did not return to God with their whole heart, but feignedly, Jeremiah 3:10. All their professions, prayers, and promises, were extorted by the rack. It was plain that they did not mean as they said, for they did not adhere to it. They thawed in the sun, but froze in the shade. They did but lie to God with their tongues, for their heart was not with him, was not right with him, as appeared by the issue, for they were not stedfast in his covenant. They were not sincere in their reformation, for they were not constant; and, by thinking thus to impose upon a heart-searching God, they really put as great an affront upon him as by any of their reflections.
7.God hereupon, in pity to them, put a stop to the judgments which were threatened and in part executed (Psalm 78:38, Psalm 78:39): But he, being full of compassion, forgave their iniquity. One would think this counterfeit repentance should have filled up the measure of their iniquity. What could be more provoking than to lie thus to the holy God, than thus to keep back part of the price, the chief part? Acts 5:3. And yet he, being full of compassion, forgave their iniquity thus far, that he did not destroy them and cut them off from being a people, as he justly might have done, but spared their lives till they had reared another generation which should enter into the promised land. Destroy it not, for a blessing is in it, Isaiah 65:8. Many a time he turned his anger away (for he is Lord of his anger) and did not stir up all his wrath, to deal with them as they deserved: and why did he not? Not because their ruin would have been any loss to him, but,
(1.)Because he was full of compassion and, when he was going to destroy them, his repentings were kindled together, and he said, How shall I give thee up, Ephraim? How shall I deliver thee, Israel? Hosea 11:8.
(2.)Because, though they did not rightly remember that he was their rock, he remembered that they were but flesh. He considered the corruption of their nature, which inclined them to evil, and was pleased to make that an excuse for his sparing them, though it was really no excuse for their sin. See Genesis 6:3. He considered the weakness and frailty of their nature, and what an easy thing it would be to crush them: They are as a wind that passeth away and cometh not again. They may soon be taken off, but, when they are gone, they are gone irrecoverably, and then what will become of the covenant with Abraham? They are flesh, they are wind; whence it were easy to argue they may justly, they may immediately, be cut off, and there would be no loss of them: but God argues, on the contrary, therefore he will not destroy them; for the true reason is, He is full of compassion.
Historical interpretation
Historical reception
1 surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.
But what that is which he says, "they have been turned back in the day of war," the following words do teach, wherein he has most clearly explained this: "they have not kept," he says, "the testament of God, and in His law they would not walk" [Psalm 78:10]. Behold what is, "they have been turned back in the day of war:" they have not kept the testament of God. When they were bending and shooting bows, they did also utter the words of most forward promise, saying, "Whatsoever things the Lord our God has spoken we will do, and we will hear." [Exodus 19:8] "They have been turned back in the day of war:" because the promise of obedience not hearing but temptation does prove. But he whose spirit has been trusted with God, keeps hold on God, who is faithful, and "does not suffer him to be tempted above that which he is able; but will make with the temptation a way of escape also," [1 Corinthians 10:13] that he may be able to endure, and may not be turned back in the day of war....Therefore these men have been thus branded: "a generation," he says, "which has not directed their heart." It has not been said, works, but heart. For when the heart is directed, the works are right; but when the heart is not directed, the works are not right, even though they seem to be right. And how the crooked generation has not directed the heart, has sufficiently been shown, when he says, "and the spirit thereof has not been trusted with God." For God is right: and therefore by cleaving to the right, as to an immutable rule, the heart of a man can be made right, which in itself was crooked....
Continue studying Psalm 78:10 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
They broke the covenant God had made with them and refused to walk in the way his law laid out, a willing turn away from his instruction.
“They kept not the covenant of God,”
“They” carries on from Ephraim, who stand for all Israel. The covenant is the one made at Sinai, with blessings for obedience and curses for disobedience.
“and refused to walk in his law;”
A chosen turning from the path God laid out. The second line adds to the first to show that the breach was willing.
Passage studyPsalm 78:9–11
Ephraim Turns Back and Forgets God’s Works
Summary
Psalm 78 is a long teaching psalm in which Asaph retells Israel’s history so that the generations to come will trust God. In these three verses he stops on a picture of failure. The men of Ephraim, armed and carrying bows, turned back in the day of battle. The next two verses give the reason: they kept not the covenant of God, they refused to walk in his law, and they forgot the works and wonders he had shown them. Their weapons were real, and the weakness was in their hearts. The passage teaches that strength without trust in God gives way when it is tested, and that forgetting what God has done is where disobedience begins.
Why did armed Ephraim turn back in battle?
“The children of Ephraim” are the tribe descended from Ephraim, one of the two sons of Joseph. The word for children, bên, means a son in the widest sense, and so it covers all of a man’s descendants. The name ʼEphrayim means “double fruit”, and the tribe grew into one of the most numerous, influential and militarily strong tribes in Israel. It later became the leading tribe of the northern kingdom, so that “Ephraim” often stands in Scripture for the whole of the north.
The verse takes care to show that these men were ready. The word behind “being armed”, nâshaq, most often means to kiss, and it is also used of being armed, which is plainly its sense here. Under “carrying” stands râmâh, to hurl and specifically to shoot, so these were bowmen equipped to fight. The bow, qesheth, takes its name from bending, and it was one of the chief weapons of that day. The same word can stand for strength, which is exactly what Ephraim held in its hands.
Then comes the turn. The verb hâphak means to turn about or over, and by implication to change or overturn. In the day of battle it means that the archers wheeled round and fled from the enemy. The “day”, yôwm, is a day or a span of time, and here it is the moment of hostile encounter, qᵉrâb, the very hour all their preparation was for. A large, well-armed tribe was expected to win, and that is why their retreat is so striking.
Asaph gives the reason in the next two verses. The flight on the battlefield matched a turning away from God’s promised help that had already taken place in their hearts, because they had broken his covenant and forgotten his works. All through the days of the judges, Israel’s success in battle was bound up with obedience and trust in the LORD, and Proverbs gives the same rule for every life: “Trust in the LORD with all thine heart” (Proverbs 3:5–6). The letter to the Hebrews describes the believer’s steadfastness in words that answer this verse: “But we are not of them who draw back unto perdition; but of them that believe to the saving of the soul” (Hebrews 10:38–39).
Which battle was it?
The psalm leaves the battle unnamed. It most likely has in view a pattern of defeats in the days of the judges or the early kings, when Israel’s strength so often proved too weak whenever God’s help was missing. Asaph’s concern is the reason for the retreat, and he tells it as a warning to every later generation.
Was it wrong for Ephraim to be armed?
Ephraim’s readiness was real, and the verse records the bows to show how much was in their hands. Preparing well is wise, and God often works through means that people have made ready. What failed Ephraim was confidence placed in the weapons themselves, because victory and lasting success come from God alone. Paul tells believers to take up the whole armour of God for their own conflict (Ephesians 6:10–13).
Why is Ephraim singled out?
Ephraim was a leading tribe, and naming it shows that even the strongest part of Israel could fall into unbelief. Its failure here also prepares for the close of the psalm, where God rejects Ephraim and chooses Judah and David to lead his people (Psalm 78:67–72).
What covenant did they break?
The “they” of verses 10 and 11 follows on from Ephraim in verse 9. Ephraim stands here for the whole people, and the charge reaches back to the generations who saw God’s deliverance and received his law.
“They kept not the covenant of God” names the heart of the failure. The verb shâmar properly means to hedge about, as with thorns, and so to guard, protect, observe and take heed. To keep God’s covenant was to guard it as a precious thing and to watch over its terms in daily life, and Israel left it unguarded.
The covenant, bᵉrîyth, is a compact, alliance or league. The origin of the word is uncertain, and Strong’s connects it with cutting, because a covenant was made by passing between pieces of flesh. In Scripture it is often a binding agreement set up by a greater party with a lesser one, as when God made his covenant with Abraham. The word for God here is ʼĕlôhîym, and the covenant of God is the one he made with Israel at Mount Sinai after bringing them out of Egypt (Exodus 19–24). There Israel became his own treasured people, a kingdom of priests (Exodus 19:5–6). God promised to be their God and to bless them, and Israel was bound to obey his laws, from the Ten Commandments to the statutes for worship, justice and daily life. The covenant carried blessings for obedience and curses for disobedience (Deuteronomy 28:15).
Breaking it was a rejection of who they were as God’s people and of the one who had set them free. The generation that received the law in the wilderness broke it again and again, through idolatry, complaining and rebellion, and they were kept out of the promised land (Numbers 14:22–23).
What does it mean to walk in his law?
“Refused to walk in his law” shows that the breach was willing. The verb mâʼên means to refuse, and a refusal is a choice made with the way in plain view. To walk, yâlak, is used both literally and figuratively, and walking in the law means letting it guide each step of life, as a traveller keeps to a road. The law, tôwrâh, is a precept or statute, especially the Ten Commandments or the five books of Moses, and it carries the broad sense of instruction and teaching. God gave it for Israel’s good, to lead them into blessing in the land, and Moses set the choice before them: “choose life” (Deuteronomy 30:19–20).
The second line of the verse says again what the first said and sharpens it. Breaking the covenant and refusing the law are one failure seen from two sides.
Believers in Christ are not under the law of Moses as the way of salvation. Walking in his law now means living by God’s will made known in Christ, in the power of the Holy Spirit, and Jesus ties it to love: “If ye love me, keep my commandments” (John 14:15).
What did they forget?
“And forgat his works” goes to the root. The verb shâkach means to forget, and Strong’s describes it as mislaying something, being oblivious of it from want of memory or attention. What they let slip were God’s works, ʻălîylâh, a word used of God’s mighty exploits, and his wonders. The word under “wonders” is pâlâʼ, which properly means perhaps to separate or distinguish, and by implication to be great, difficult or wonderful. These were deeds that displayed God’s power and majesty and were meant to fill people with awe.
Together the two words cover all that God had done, his steady care and his astonishing acts. The generation of the exodus had seen the plagues on Egypt, the parting of the Red Sea (Exodus 14), the manna given day by day (Exodus 16), the water from the rock (Exodus 17) and the covenant at Sinai. They had been led by the pillar of cloud and fire and kept safe from their enemies. The verses that follow in the psalm go on to tell of the Red Sea and the manna (Psalm 78:12–29).
“That he had shewed them” makes the guilt heavier. The word behind “shewed” is râʼâh, the common verb for seeing, so these deeds were things the people had witnessed with their own eyes. They had firsthand knowledge of God’s faithfulness and power, and still they let it go.
Was Israel’s forgetting simple loss of memory?
Israel’s forgetting was a failure to keep God’s deeds in mind so that they shaped how the people trusted and lived. They had seen his mighty acts and chose to live apart from what they had seen, and the wilderness record shows where that led, in the rebellion at Kadesh Barnea (Numbers 14) and in Moses’ warnings against forgetting God once they were settled in the land (Deuteronomy 8). Forgetting of this kind is a moral and spiritual failure, and it bears fruit in ingratitude, unbelief and disobedience.
Memory stood at the centre of Israel’s life. Remembering God’s mighty acts shaped their worship and their faithfulness to the covenant, and feasts such as Passover were given so that the people would remember. Moses warned them to beware lest they forget the LORD who brought them out of Egypt (Deuteronomy 6:12). In the days of the judges the warning came true, for “there arose another generation after them, which knew not the LORD, nor yet the works which he had done for Israel” (Judges 2:10).
The psalm’s own opening sets out the goal these verses fall short of. Each generation was to tell God’s works to the next, “That they might set their hope in God, and not forget the works of God, but keep his commandments” (Psalm 78:7). Verses 10 and 11 describe the reverse: a people who kept not his covenant and forgat his works.
Why does the psalm tell this story?
Psalm 78 is a maskil, a psalm of instruction, and Asaph opens it by calling God’s people to hear his teaching (Psalm 78:1–8). His aim is that the generation to come, the children yet to be born, should know God’s works and tell them to their own children (Psalm 78:6). He surveys Israel’s history from the exodus through the wilderness, the conquest and the judges to the reign of David. He tells the failures so that the children will be unlike their fathers, “a stubborn and rebellious generation” (Psalm 78:8). Ephraim’s retreat, the broken covenant and the forgotten wonders are history told as a lesson.
The same history, running through the whole of Psalm 78, sets God’s patience and faithfulness again and again beside his people’s unfaithfulness. His purposes for them stood firm through it all. The letter to the Hebrews gives Christians the same warning, against an evil, unbelieving heart (Hebrews 3:12).
How does Christ answer Ephraim’s failure?
Ephraim retreated in the day of battle. Christ faced the greatest battle of all, against sin, death and the powers of darkness, and he held firm all the way to the cross in perfect trust in his Father. He went into it armed with the word of God and his own sinless life, offered as the sacrifice for sin. Paul says of the cross that “having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it” (Colossians 2:15). All who belong to him by faith are “more than conquerors through him that loved us” (Romans 8:37), and he is “the author and finisher of our faith” (Hebrews 12:2). Our standing firm rests on his victory.
Israel kept not the covenant, and Christ kept the law perfectly, giving the obedience Israel failed to give (Matthew 5:17). By his death he made the new covenant: “This cup is the new testament in my blood” (Luke 22:20). Israel’s history showed the limits of a law written on stone to change the heart, and God promised a covenant in which he would write his law on the hearts and minds of his people (Jeremiah 31:31–33). Hebrews repeats that promise (Hebrews 10:16) and calls the new covenant a better one (Hebrews 8:7–13). Ezekiel speaks of a new heart and a new spirit given by God (Ezekiel 36:26–27), and Paul says that what the law requires is fulfilled in those who walk after the Spirit (Romans 8:3–4).
Where Israel forgot, Christ gives his people a meal of remembrance. At his table we remember the greatest of God’s works, for Jesus said, “this do in remembrance of me” (Luke 22:19). He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29), and in him all the promises of God are yea (2 Corinthians 1:20). The Spirit who lives in believers helps them to remember and to keep their eyes on him.
The God who shows his works
These verses speak plainly about human failure, and in the same breath they show who God is. He is the God who acts for his people and lets them see it: “his works, and his wonders that he had shewed them”. He binds himself to them by covenant and gives them his law as a road to walk in. When they turn back, he goes on teaching, and he has their story told to the next generation so that his works will be remembered.
What God showed Israel in Egypt and the wilderness he has shown us more fully in Christ, whose cross is the greatest of his works. Ephraim’s bows failed them in the day of battle, and the one who held firm all the way to the cross has won the battle for us. The answer to forgetting is remembering, and God himself has given us the means in his word, in the Lord’s Supper and in his Spirit within.
Psalm 78:9
“The children of Ephraim,”
The tribe descended from Joseph’s son Ephraim, one of the strongest in Israel, whose name often stands for the northern kingdom.
“being armed, and carrying bows,”
Equipped for battle and ready to shoot, so everything the fight required was in their hands.
“turned back in the day of battle.”
They fled at the very moment of combat. In the psalm this is a failure of courage that comes from a failure of faith in God’s power to give the victory.
Psalm 78:10 This verse
“They kept not the covenant of God,”
“They” carries on from Ephraim, who stand for all Israel. The covenant is the one made at Sinai, with blessings for obedience and curses for disobedience.
“and refused to walk in his law;”
A chosen turning from the path God laid out. The second line adds to the first to show that the breach was willing.
Psalm 78:11
“And forgat his works,”
God’s mighty deeds for Israel from Egypt onward, which they let slip from their minds and from their lives.
“and his wonders”
His astonishing acts, such as the plagues, the parting of the Red Sea and the water from the rock.
“that he had shewed them.”
They had seen these things for themselves, which makes their forgetting all the more to blame.
Last revised