- English
- King James KJV
- Complete Jewish CJB
- World English WEBM
- Berean Standard BSB
- American Standard ASV
- Geneva GNV
- Young's Literal YLT
- Douay-Rheims DRC
- International
- Shqip ALB
- العربية SVD
- বাংলা BN-IRV
- မြန်မာ Judson
- 简体文 CUV-S
- 繁體中文 CUV-T
- Čeština BKR
- Nederlands STVE
- Français LSG
- Deutsch SCH
- Ελληνικά Vamvas
- ગુજરાતી GU-IRV
- Hausa HCB
- עברית Hebrew
- हिन्दी HCV
- Magyar KAROLI
- Bahasa Indonesia INDO-TB
- Italiano Diodati
- 日本語 Kougo
- 한국어 Korean
- മലയാളം MAL
- मराठी MRCV
- Norsk DNB
- فارسی OPV
- Polski BG
- Português Almeida
- Română Cornilescu
- Русский Synodal
- Español RVG
- Kiswahili Neno
- Svenska SV1917
- Tagalog TAG-ADB
- தமிழ் TCV
- తెలుగు TSA
- ภาษาไทย THAI-KJV
- Українська Ohienko
- Tiếng Việt CADMAN
- Yorùbá YCB
King James Version
And, Whosoever shall swear by the altar, it is nothing; but whosoever sweareth by the gift that is upon it, he is guilty.
Complete Jewish Bible
And you say, `If someone swears by the altar, he is not bound by his oath; but if he swears by the offering on the altar, he is bound.'
Berean Standard Bible
And you say, ‘If anyone swears by the altar, it means nothing; but if anyone swears by the gift on it, he is bound by his oath.’
American Standard Version
And, Whosoever shall swear by the altar, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gift that is upon it, he is a debtor.
World English Bible Messianic
‘Whoever swears by the altar, it is nothing; but whoever swears by the gift that is on it, he is obligated?’
Geneva Bible (1599)
And whosoeuer sweareth by the altar, it is nothing: but whosoeuer sweareth by the offering that is vpon it, offendeth.
Young's Literal Translation
`And, whoever may swear by the altar, it is nothing; but whoever may swear by the gift that is upon it--is debtor!
Translation
See on the biblical-era map



In the KJVVerse 23,937 of 31,102 · 77.0%
LawLawHistoryHistPoetryPoetProphetsProphNew TestamentNT
Study this verse
Copy as
Historical interpretation
Ten Centuries of Reception
8 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
2003004005006007008009001000110012001300
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Those who work in the fields of the gospel seek the hidden meaning of these passages of Scripture. We are not simply confiscating the higher parts of Scripture but rather looking toward its whole sense. As regards swearing, it is intended as a binding action, seeking to confirm the word concerning which something is sworn.Consider this analogy. Think of the altar as the heart and the temple as the whole of Scripture. The temple of God’s glory, spiritually understood, is the divinely inspired Scripture. The gold refers to the meanings it conveys. To swear is to witness to the Scriptures, as a validation and confirmation of the word we speak. Therefore we ought to profess the whole sense of Scripture as a confirmation of the sense which we invoke in all of our words.
Gold found outside the temple is not sanctified. Rather, that gold which is found in the temple is the measure of that which is outside it. Similarly the meaning which is found outside of the Scriptures is not holy, but it is contained in the meaning of the Scriptures. Only that sense of Scripture is sanctified which can be seen from within the temple itself, that is, within the whole of Scripture. The temple, that is, the reading of the Scriptures, makes a great and venerable sense, just as consecrated gold is valuable. So we ought not to swear by our own intellects to confirm our beliefs, as if we were creating witnesses that could judge according to the truth. But let us explore further the analogy of the temple, the gold and the altar. The altar is the place where a vow is sanctified. The altar in this passage is the heart of a man. What happens in the heart happens deeply within a person. Vows and gifts placed on the altar are clearly those placed upon the human heart. When you begin to pray, you place the vow of your prayer upon your heart, as if you had placed something upon the altar, so that you might offer your prayer to God.
Suppose you are ready to place an offering of psalms upon your heart, so as to offer to God an offering of psalms, accompanying yourself with a harp. Or suppose you are ready to give alms. You make an offering of alms upon your heart, just as if you had placed something on the altar, as you would offer your alms to God. Suppose you have proposed to fast in order to make an offering of your fasting upon your heart, as if you had placed something upon the altar.
In this way the heart of a man makes vows in a holy and venerable way. It is from the heart, that is, the altar, that the vow is offered to God. Therefore it is not possible for the offering of a man to be more honorable than his heart from which the offering is sent up.
In like manner the custom which the Jews had of swearing by the Heaven He reprobates. For they did not, as they supposed, avoid the danger of taking an oath by God, because, Whose sweareth by heaven, sweareth by the throne of God, and by him that sitteth thereon.
Now an oath is in confirmation of somewhat that has been spoken. The oath here then may signify testimony of Scripture which we produce in confirmation of that word which we speak. So that Divine Scripture is the temple of God, the gold is the meaning which it contains. As the gold which is outside the Temple is not sanctified, so all thoughts which are without divine Scripture, however admirable they may seem, are not hallowed. We ought not therefore to bring any speculations of our own for the confirmation of doctrine, unless such as we can show are hallowed by being contained in divine Scripture. The altar is the human heart, which is the chief thing in man. The offerings and gifts that are hid upon the altar, are every thing which are done in the heart, as to pray, to sing, to do alms, to fast. Every offering of a man then is sanctified by his heart, by which the offering is made. There cannot therefore be a more honourable offering than the heart of man, out of which the offering proceeds. If then one's conscience does not smite him, he has confidence towards God, not by reason of his gifts, but so to speak because he has rightly ordered the altar of his heart. Thirdly, we may say that over the temple, that is over every Scripture, and over the altar, that is over every heart, there is a certain meaning which is called the Heaven, the throne of God Himself, in which we shall be able to see the things that are revealed face to face, when that which is perfect is come.
For since Christ is come, reliance upon the Law is vain; for not Christ by the Law, but the Law by Christ, is sanctified, in whom it rests as on a seat or throne; so are they fools and blind, who, overlooking the sanctifier, pay honour to the things sanctified.
As by making broad phylacteries and fringes they sought after the reputation of sanctity, and made this again a means of gain, so now He charges them with being teachers of wickedness by their fraudulent pretence of tradition. For when in any dispute or quarrel, or ambiguous cause, one swore by the temple, and was afterwards convicted of falsehood, he was not held guilty. This is what is meant by that, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing, that is, he owes nothing, But if he had sworn by the gold, or by the money which was offered to the Priests in the temple, he was immediately compelled to pay down that by which he had sworn.
Again, if one swore by the altar, none held him guilty of perjury; but if he swore by the gift or the victims or the other things which are offered to God upon the altar, this they exacted most rigorously. And all this they did not out of fear of God, but out of covetousness. Thus the Lord charges them with both folly and fraud, inasmuch as the altar is much greater than the victims which are sanctified by the altar.
(Verse 16 onwards) Woe to you, blind guides, who say, 'Whoever swears by the temple is nothing, but whoever swears by the gold of the temple is bound by his oath.' Fools and blind! For which is greater, the gold or the temple that sanctifies the gold? And, 'Whoever swears by the altar is nothing, but whoever swears by the gift that is on it is obligated.' Blind! For which is greater, the gift or the altar that sanctifies the gift? Therefore, whoever swears on the altar, swears on it and on all things that are above it. And whoever swears in the temple, swears in it and in him who dwells in it. And whoever swears in heaven, swears on the throne of God and on him who sits on it. Above, as it seemed to us, we have explained what the tradition of the Pharisees meant, saying: Whatever gift is from me will benefit you: now the double tradition of the Pharisees, enticing to one occasion of greed, is condemned, so that they may be proved to do everything for gain and not for the fear of God. For just as in the phylacteries and fringes, by enlarged expectations of holiness, it was trying to capture glory, and was seeking gains through the opportunity of glory, so another tradition found fault with the teachers of impiety. If anyone were to swear in the temple during a dispute, or in some argument, or in a doubtful case, and later be convicted of lying, they were not held accountable for the crime. But if they were to swear on gold and money, which was offered to the priests in the temple, they were immediately compelled to fulfill what they had sworn. Again: If anyone swore upon the altar, no one held him guilty of perjury; but if he swore falsely on a gift, or on offerings, that is, on victims and on fine flour and on the rest, which are offered to God upon the altar, these were most diligently sought after. Therefore, the Lord reproached them both for foolishness and deceit, because the temple is much greater than the gold that is sanctified by the temple, and the altar is greater than the offerings that are sanctified by the altar. But they did it not out of fear of God, but out of greed for riches.
(Quæst. Ev. i. 34.) The temple and altar we may also understand of Christ Himself; the gold and the gifts, of the praise and sacrifice of prayer which we offer in Him and through Him. For not He by them, but they by Him, are sanctified.
The temple pertains to God's glory, and to man's spiritual salvation, but the gold of the temple though it pertains to the glory of God, yet does it more so to the delight of man, and the profit of the Priests. The Jews then pronounced the gold which delighted them, and the gifts which fed them, to be more holy than the temple, that they might make men more disposed to offer gifts, than to pour out prayers in the temple. Whence the Lord suitably reproves them in these words. Yet have some Christians at present an equally foolish notion. See, they say, in any suit if one swear by God, it seems nought; but if one swear by the Gospel, he seems to have done some great thing. To whom we shall say in like manner, Ye fools and blind! the Scriptures were written because of God, God is not because of the Scriptures. Greater therefore is God, than what is hallowed by Him.
(non occ.) And lest their infatuation should go so far, that they should affirm that the gold was more holy than the temple, and the gift than the altar, He argues on another ground, that in the oath which is sworn by the temple and the altar is contained the oath by the gold or by the gift.
(ord.) For whoso swears by the creature that is subject, swears by the Divinity that rules over the creation.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying Matthew 23:18 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
In Matthew 23:18, Jesus continues His scathing indictment of the scribes and Pharisees, exposing their profound spiritual blindness and deeply entrenched hypocrisy, specifically regarding their convoluted and self-serving teachings on oaths. This particular verse highlights their flawed legalistic distinctions, asserting that an oath sworn by the altar itself was considered non-binding, while an oath sworn by the offering or "gift" placed upon the altar was deemed obligatory, thereby revealing a system designed to manipulate religious commitments for personal advantage rather than upholding divine truth.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is situated within the broader context of Jesus's final and most forceful public denunciation of the religious leaders of His day, recorded in Matthew chapter 23. Following a series of seven "woes" (or pronouncements of judgment) that began in Matthew 23:13, Jesus systematically dismantles their self-righteousness, legalism, and their egregious misguidance of the people. Specifically, Matthew 23:16-22 targets their convoluted system of oaths, where they distinguished between what made an oath valid or void. Jesus uses their own logic to expose its absurdity and spiritual perversion, demonstrating that their distinctions were not rooted in genuine reverence for God but in a desire to control and profit from religious practice.
Historical & Cultural Context
During the Second Temple period, oaths were a common and significant part of Jewish life, used to affirm truth, make promises, or seal agreements. However, the scribes and Pharisees had developed an intricate casuistry around oaths, creating a hierarchy of binding power based on the object sworn by. This system allowed them to declare certain oaths non-binding if they were inconvenient, while insisting on the validity of others, often those involving financial gain or personal advantage. Their teachings reflected a legalistic mindset that prioritized external observance and technicalities over the spirit of the law and true integrity. The Temple and its altar were central to Jewish worship, and the offerings placed upon the altar were consecrated to God. The Pharisees' distinction inverted the logical and theological order, valuing the derivative (the gift) over the sanctifying agent (the altar), which revealed a profound spiritual misdirection.
Key Themes
The central theme illuminated by this verse is the Hypocrisy and Spiritual Blindness of the religious leaders. Their teaching demonstrated a profound lack of spiritual discernment, prioritizing the lesser (the gift) over the greater (the altar) which sanctified these items. Jesus exposes this as an attempt to find loopholes around their commitments, revealing a heart far from true reverence for God. Another key theme is the Integrity of Oaths and Speech. Jesus emphasizes that an oath, regardless of its specific wording, ultimately appeals to God, who is the ultimate source of truth and authority. Their distinctions were an evasion of truthfulness. His broader teaching on oaths, as seen in the Sermon on the Mount, advises against swearing at all, advocating for simple truthfulness: "Let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay" (Matthew 5:37). Finally, the verse touches on the Sanctity of God's Presence and Sacred Spaces. The altar itself was consecrated and made holy by God's presence and purpose (Exodus 29:37). The gift placed upon it derived its sanctity from the altar, not the other way around. By valuing the gift over the altar, the Pharisees inverted the true order of holiness, demonstrating their focus on human offerings rather than divine sanctity.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This verb signifies to take or declare an oath, binding oneself by a solemn promise, often invoking a divine witness. In this context, it highlights the act of making a sacred vow, which the Pharisees then attempted to categorize as binding or non-binding based on arbitrary distinctions.
This strong negative particle means "not even one," "none at all," or "of no consequence." When applied to an oath sworn by the altar, it reveals the Pharisees' teaching that such an oath carried no legal or moral obligation, effectively rendering it void and allowing for deceit.
This verb primarily means "to owe" or "to be indebted," but figuratively, it extends to "being under obligation," "ought," "must," "should," and morally, "to fail in duty" or "be bound." Here, it directly contrasts with "nothing," indicating that an oath sworn by the gift did incur a binding obligation or debt, exposing their self-serving criteria.
Verse Breakdown
"And, Whosoever shall swear by the altar, it is nothing"
Jesus quotes the Pharisees' teaching, which held that an oath made by the altar itself was not binding. This reveals their arbitrary distinction, as the altar was the sacred object that consecrated the gifts placed upon it. To them, the altar's intrinsic holiness was less significant than the material offerings.
"but whosoever sweareth by the gift that is upon it, he is guilty"
In stark contrast, the Pharisees taught that an oath sworn by the "gift" or offering on the altar was binding. This highlights their misplaced values, prioritizing the material offering (which often had monetary value or was a direct contribution) over the sacred structure that sanctified it. The term "guilty" here implies that one is obligated, indebted, or bound by such an oath, making them liable for its fulfillment.
Literary Devices
Jesus employs Irony and Contrast to expose the Pharisees' spiritual bankruptcy. The Irony lies in their assertion that the altar, the very instrument of consecration and the focal point of sacrifice, held no binding power for an oath, while the gift, which derived its holiness from the altar, did. This inversion of spiritual logic is highlighted by the sharp Contrast between "it is nothing" and "he is guilty." Jesus uses their own convoluted reasoning to demonstrate their profound Spiritual Blindness, as they failed to grasp the foundational principle that the greater sanctifies the lesser. Their system was a perversion of true reverence, prioritizing material gain or convenience over the sanctity of God's presence and the integrity of one's word.
Theological and Thematic Connections
This verse powerfully underscores the dangers of religious legalism and externalism, revealing a heart that seeks loopholes rather than genuine obedience. The Pharisees' system of oaths was a symptom of their broader theological error: they valued human traditions and material offerings above the divine source of holiness and truth. Jesus's condemnation reaffirms that all oaths, regardless of their specific wording or object, ultimately invoke God's name and character, making them inherently binding. True integrity of speech stems from a heart devoted to truth, not from a meticulous adherence to self-serving distinctions. This teaching aligns with the broader biblical emphasis on internal purity over external ritual, and the call for believers to embody truthfulness in all their interactions.
Reflection and Application
Jesus's denunciation of the Pharisees' oath system serves as a timeless warning against hypocrisy and spiritual blindness. For believers today, it challenges us to examine the authenticity of our faith and the integrity of our words. Are we seeking to live by the spirit of God's law, or are we, like the Pharisees, looking for technicalities and loopholes to justify our actions or avoid uncomfortable truths? Our "yes" should genuinely mean "yes," and our "no" should mean "no," reflecting a heart that values truth and commitment above all else. This requires a deep commitment to honesty in all areas of life, recognizing that our words carry weight and reflect on the God we serve. It also calls us to discern what truly holds value in God's eyes, prioritizing His holiness and truth over any human-made traditions or material offerings.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did the Pharisees make such a distinction between swearing by the altar and swearing by the gift on it?
The Pharisees' distinction was rooted in a legalistic system that sought to control the binding nature of oaths. They likely considered the "gift" (an offering, often of monetary value) to be more directly tied to a tangible, measurable commitment or a personal transaction, whereas the altar itself was a general sacred object. By declaring an oath by the altar as "nothing," they could potentially avoid inconvenient obligations, while an oath by the gift, which might involve a financial pledge or a specific offering, was deemed binding. This allowed them to manipulate religious commitments for their own convenience or gain, demonstrating a focus on external appearances and material value rather than the inherent sanctity of God's presence or the integrity of one's word. Jesus exposes this as a perversion of true spiritual understanding, highlighting their spiritual blindness and hypocrisy, as seen in Matthew 23:16-17.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Jesus's condemnation of the Pharisees' hypocritical oath system in Matthew 23:18 finds its ultimate fulfillment in His own person and work. He is the embodiment of perfect integrity and truth, the "Amen, the faithful and true witness" (Revelation 3:14). Unlike the Pharisees who sought to manipulate truth through arbitrary distinctions, Jesus consistently spoke with unparalleled authority and truthfulness, affirming that His "yes" was always "yes" (2 Corinthians 1:20). Furthermore, the very altar and gifts the Pharisees debated find their spiritual culmination in Christ. He is the ultimate "gift" given by God for the sins of the world (John 3:16), and His body is the true Temple (John 2:19-21) and the altar upon which the perfect, once-for-all sacrifice was offered (Hebrews 13:10). Through His perfect life, sacrificial death, and resurrection, Jesus fulfills the law's demands for truth and integrity, making human attempts at self-righteousness and legalistic distinctions utterly meaningless in comparison to the boundless grace and truth found in Him.