Skip to content

Amos 5:24

“God Rejects Empty Worship”Amos 5:21–27

King James Version
But let judgment run down as waters, and righteousness as a mighty stream.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
But let judgment H4941 run down H1556 as waters H4325, and righteousness H6666 as a mighty H386 stream H5158.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
But let justice roll on like a river, and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
But let justice roll down as waters, and righteousness as a mighty stream.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
But let justice roll on like rivers, and righteousness like a mighty stream.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
And let iudgement runne downe as waters, and righteousnesse as a mightie riuer.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
And roll on as waters doth judgment, And righteousness as a perennial stream.

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
6 Hebrew words
  1. וְיִגַּלve·yi·Galand it may roll onH1556Conj-w ¦ V-Niphal-ConjImperf-3msVerb Niphal Conjunction+Imperfect 3rd Singular Masculineוְandיִגַּלit may roll on
  2. כַּמַּיִםka·Ma·yimlike [the] waterH4325Prep-k ¦ N-mpNoun Plural Masculine Absoluteכַּlike [the]מַּיִםwater
  3. מִשְׁפָּטmish·PatjusticeH4941N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absolute
  4. וּצְדָקָהu·tze·da·Kahand righteousnessH6666Conj-w ¦ N-fsNoun Singular Feminine Absoluteוּandצְדָקָהrighteousness
  5. כְּנַחַלke·Na·challike a wadiH5158Prep-k ¦ N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absoluteכְּlikeנַחַלa wadi
  6. אֵיתָן'ei·Tanever-flowingH386Adj-msAdjective Singular Masculine Absolute
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation differences
Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 22,448 of 31,102 · 72.2%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

In place of empty ritual God asks for justice to roll on like waters and righteousness like a stream that flows strongly all year.

“But let judgment run down as waters,”

The turn of the whole passage. Justice in the courts and in daily dealings is to roll on freely, open to everyone, as water runs down a slope.

“and righteousness as a mighty stream.”

Upright character and conduct, lasting through every season like a stream that stays full when the wadis have dried up.

Passage studyAmos 5:21–27

God Rejects Worship Without Justice

21I hate, I despise your feast days, and I will not smell in your solemn assemblies. 22Though ye offer me burnt offerings and your meat offerings, I will not accept them: neither will I regard the peace offerings of your fat beasts. 23Take thou away from me the noise of thy songs; for I will not hear the melody of thy viols. 24But let judgment run down as waters, and righteousness as a mighty stream. 25Have ye offered unto me sacrifices and offerings in the wilderness forty years, O house of Israel? 26But ye have borne the tabernacle of your Moloch and Chiun your images, the star of your god, which ye made to yourselves. 27Therefore will I cause you to go into captivity beyond Damascus, saith the LORD, whose name is The God of hosts.

Summary

The LORD tells the northern kingdom of Israel that he hates their feast days, refuses their offerings and wants their songs taken out of his hearing, because the people who worship so busily are crushing the poor and keeping idols. What he asks for is judgment running down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream. He then reminds them of the forty years in the wilderness, names the idols they have carried, and announces the sentence: captivity beyond Damascus, spoken by the LORD whose name is The God of hosts.

A prosperous kingdom at worship while the poor are crushed

Amos spoke these words to the northern kingdom of Israel around 760–750 BC, in the reign of Jeroboam II (about 793–753 BC). Amos himself was a shepherd and a gatherer of figs from the southern kingdom of Judah, called by God to confront the north. It was a time of wealth, political stability and expanding borders, and the wealth gathered at the top. The rich exploited the poor, bribes bent the courts, and the needy were turned aside in the gate, all of which the verses just before this passage condemn (Amos 5:7–13).

Through all of it the people kept up their religion. They held the feasts, brought sacrifices and sang at shrines such as Bethel, Gilgal and Dan, where the worship of the LORD was blended with the idolatry of the nations around them and where the monarchy had sanctioned golden calves. They trusted that festivals and sacrifices would keep God’s favour whatever their lives were like.

The chapter opens with a funeral lament over Israel (Amos 5:1–3) and then pleads, “Seek ye me, and ye shall live” (Amos 5:4–6). Our passage closes a woe spoken over those who long for the day of the LORD, and it gives God’s own verdict on the religion of a people who had refused to seek him. The book began with oracles against the surrounding nations and against Israel (Amos 1–2), and Amos had already mocked this zealous, unrighteous worship by urging the people on to more of it at Bethel and Gilgal (Amos 4:4–5).

“I hate, I despise your feast days”

God opens with two strong verbs set side by side. To hate, sânêʼ, is to hold something in strong personal aversion, and to despise, mâʼaç, is to spurn or reject it. Together they tell Israel that God is pushing their worship away from himself. The “feast days” (chaggim) are the yearly pilgrimage festivals of Passover, Weeks and Tabernacles, the three feasts the law appointed (Deuteronomy 16:16). The “solemn assemblies” (ʻătsârâh) are the sacred gatherings that went with them. They were meant to be glad occasions for remembering God’s faithfulness to his covenant.

“I will not smell” comes from the language of sacrifice. The verb rûwach means to blow or breathe, and so to smell or perceive. When Noah offered his sacrifice after the flood, the LORD smelled a sweet savour, which was the sign that he accepted it (Genesis 8:21). Here God speaks in the same human terms to say the opposite. The smoke goes up from Israel’s altars, and he refuses to take any pleasure in it. The rites that were meant to rise to him as a pleasing aroma have become offensive to him. The two halves of the verse say one thing in two ways, as Hebrew poetry often does, and the second half presses the first further.

The offerings God refuses

Verse 22 goes through Israel’s sacrifices one kind at a time. The verb for “offer”, ʻâlâh, means to go up or ascend, and the burnt offerings (‘olot) were the sacrifices wholly consumed on the altar, a sign of complete devotion and of atonement. The smoke went up as it always had, and God’s acceptance stayed where it was. The “meat offerings” (minchâh) are what is now usually called grain offerings. The word means a gift or tribute, and in worship it names a bloodless offering of flour, oil and frankincense, usually brought freely in thanksgiving or devotion. The “peace offerings” (shelem) were fellowship offerings. Part went to God, part to the priests, and the worshippers ate the rest together in a meal that spoke of peace and communion with him. The “fat beasts” (mᵉrîyʼ) show that Israel was bringing its best and costliest animals.

Each of these was a rightful part of the law of Moses, and God turns each one away. “I will not accept them” uses râtsâh, to be pleased with something or to accept it. “Neither will I regard” uses nâbaṭ, to look or gaze at something, and so to have regard for it. God declines even to look at the finest animals they bring. Israel thought that the quality and cost of a sacrifice would win his favour, so the mention of the fat beasts is pointed. The best that money can buy leaves God unmoved when the life behind it is unjust.

Why would God reject what he himself commanded?

The fault lay in the worshippers, and the feasts and sacrifices themselves remained God’s own institutions. He appointed the feasts in the law (Leviticus 23) as times for his people to remember his faithfulness, give thanks and worship him. The sacrifices were to be brought with a contrite heart, in repentance, as part of a covenant that also demanded justice and righteousness. Israel had cut the two apart. They oppressed the poor, perverted justice and served idols, and all the while they performed their religious duties with great care. Offerings brought that way had become an insult, an attempt to keep God content while the sin went on. So his hatred falls on worship that is corrupted, insincere and cut off from right living, the form of religion with its substance gone.

“Take thou away from me the noise of thy songs”

After the feasts and the sacrifices, God turns to the music. “Take thou away” is çûwr, to turn aside or remove, and here it is a command (sūr mēʿālay in the Hebrew, “take away from me”). God wants the singing removed from his presence. He calls their songs (shīreyḵā) “noise”, hâmôwn, a word for a tumult or the sound of a crowd. What Israel offered as devotion reached him as a din.

The “melody” (zimrāh) of the “viols” (nəḇāleḵā), stringed instruments used in worship, is the beauty and feeling of their music, and God says of it, “I will not hear.” The verb shâmaʻ means to hear, and often to hear with attention and a response. Every sound reaches God, so this is his decision to withhold acceptance and answer from their worship.

Does God hate music in worship?

Scripture is full of music that pleases God. The Psalms are songs, Moses and Israel sang to the LORD at the sea (Exodus 15:1–21), and Paul tells the church to sing to the Lord with grace in their hearts (Colossians 3:16). What God rejects in Amos is the singing of people whose hearts were far from him and whose lives were full of injustice. The songs and instruments stand in this verse for the whole act of worship, and the “noise” is the emptiness of that worship in God’s ears.

“Let judgment run down as waters”

Verse 24 turns on the word “But”. Having refused the feasts, the offerings and the songs, God says what he does want, and it is the best-known line in the book.

“Judgment”, mishpâṭ, is justice as it is carried out: a verdict given, the law applied fairly, disputes settled impartially and rights upheld, especially for those who are unable to defend themselves. “Righteousness”, tsᵉdâqâh, is rightness of character and conduct, a life that conforms to God’s own holy character and standards. The two belong together. Mishpâṭ is justice in action, and tsᵉdâqâh is the uprightness from which that justice flows.

“Run down” is gâlal, to roll. Justice is to roll on like water going downhill, constantly, reaching everything in its path. The “mighty stream” joins nachal, a stream, with ʼêythân, mighty or enduring. A seasonal wadi runs for a while and then dries up, and God asks for a stream that flows all year with force and carves its own path. Water also gives life, cleanses and makes things grow, so the picture is of justice that is plentiful, life-giving and too strong to hold back. The second line of the verse repeats and strengthens the first, so that the public side of justice and the moral side of righteousness flow together through the community.

Is this about personal morality or a whole society?

The verse speaks to both, and its main weight falls on the life of the whole community. Amos was speaking to a nation about its courts, its trade and its shrines, and waters and a mighty stream are a picture of something shared and widespread. Each person’s righteous acts feed that stream, and the call is for justice and righteousness to mark the public life and institutions of God’s people.

How the verse is rightly used today

Amos 5:24 is often quoted in calls for justice. In its own setting it is God’s answer to feasts and offerings brought by people who trod down the poor. Its principle stands in full: God refuses the worship of those who deal unjustly. Believers are to let judgment and righteousness mark their dealings, their decisions and their care for the poor, and above all to seek the LORD, who said, “Seek ye me, and ye shall live.”

The same word from the other prophets and from Jesus

Amos is saying what Scripture says throughout. Samuel told Saul that “to obey is better than sacrifice” (1 Samuel 15:22). Through Isaiah God says he is weary of the sacrifices and assemblies of a people whose hands are unclean, and he tells them to seek judgment and relieve the oppressed (Isaiah 1:11–17). Micah asks what offering a man should bring before the LORD and answers with what the LORD requires: to do justly, to love mercy and to walk humbly with God (Micah 6:6–8). Hosea speaks of God desiring mercy above sacrifice (Hosea 6:6), David says that the sacrifice God wants is a broken spirit (Psalm 51:16–17), and Proverbs sets doing righteousness and justice above sacrifice (Proverbs 21:3).

Jesus brought the same charge against the religious leaders of his day. He said of them that they honoured God with their lips while their heart was far from him, so that their worship was in vain (Matthew 15:8–9), and he pronounced a woe on the scribes and Pharisees for careful outward religion that left out justice, mercy and faithfulness (Matthew 23:23).

“Have ye offered unto me sacrifices... forty years?”

God now reaches back to the beginning of the nation. The “wilderness”, midbar, is the desert Israel crossed for forty years after the Exodus, where God fed them with manna (Exodus 16:1–35), tested them and made his covenant with them. “Sacrifices” is zebach, the flesh of a slaughtered animal offered to God, often with a shared meal that spoke of communion with him. “Offerings” is minchah again, the bloodless gift of grain. Between them the two words cover the whole of Israel’s worship. “O house of Israel” addresses the northern kingdom as a people, so the charge is national as well as personal.

The question is asked to make a point, and the point is a history. Those same forty years were full of grumbling and rebellion, and the golden calf was made at the foot of the mountain where the covenant was given (Exodus 32). The divided worship of Amos’s day was an old pattern. Israel took pride in its religious heritage, and God answers that pride by pointing to what the heritage actually held. His long patience with them stands behind the judgment he is about to announce.

Did Israel bring no sacrifices at all in the wilderness?

Israel did sacrifice in the wilderness. Burnt offerings and peace offerings were made at Sinai when the covenant was sealed (Exodus 24:5), and the Passover was kept in the wilderness in the second year (Numbers 9:1–5). God’s question is about the words “unto me”. It asks whose the offerings truly were and what spirit they were brought in. Sacrifices were made, and they were mixed with idolatry and brought by rebellious hearts, so that they were never wholly his. The next verse names the rival gods.

The idols Israel carried

Verse 26 uncovers what lay beneath the busy worship. “Ye have borne” is nâsâʼ, to lift or carry. Israel carried these objects about, in processions or for private devotion, and there is a bitter turn in it: the people whom God had carried were carrying gods of their own. The first two commandments forbid exactly this, any other god before the LORD and any image made to be worshipped (Exodus 20:3–5).

The “images” are tselem, figures made to represent a god, and the plural points to a number of them. “The star of your god” uses kôwkâb, the ordinary word for a star, and it ties this worship to the heavens. Moses had warned Israel against being drawn to worship the sun, moon and stars (Deuteronomy 4:19). “Which ye made to yourselves” closes the charge with ʻâsâh, the common verb for making or doing. These gods came from Israel’s own hands and from the nations around them, while the worship of the LORD rests on what he has revealed and commanded. Outward religion had hidden all this from other people, and God saw through it to where the people’s hearts were given.

Who are Moloch and Chiun?

“Moloch” translates the Hebrew melek, which is the word for a king. Here it names the god of the Ammonites and Canaanites who was known for the sacrifice of children, which the law forbids outright (Leviticus 18:21). That Israel carried his shrine shows how far the idolatry had gone, and the title sits in sharp contrast with the true King whose demands are righteous.

“Chiun”, Kîyûwn, comes from a root meaning to set up, and the word properly means a statue or idol. It is used for a heathen god, and the phrase “the star of your god” marks him as a star god. He is often identified with the planet Saturn, though that identification is less certain than Moloch’s. The Greek Old Testament gives the name as Rephan, and that is the form Stephen uses when he quotes this verse to the council, telling them that God gave Israel up to worship the host of heaven (Acts 7:42–43).

Why is an idol given a “tabernacle”?

The word here is çikkûwth, an idolatrous booth or shrine, and it is a different word from the one used for the Tabernacle of the LORD (mishkan). It means a small portable shrine or tent that housed an idol. The “tabernacle” stands for the whole cult that went with it. Because it was carried, this worship went wherever the people went. It may have been kept in private, at pagan festivals, or quietly alongside the public worship of the LORD, and either way it shows a personal and settled attachment to these gods.

Captivity beyond Damascus

“Therefore” ties the sentence to everything before it: the injustice, the hollow worship and the idols. “I will cause you to go” makes God himself the one who sends the nation away. He is bringing the exile about. “Captivity” is gâlâh, a word whose first meaning is to uncover or strip bare, and which came to mean going into exile. It carries the shame and helplessness of a people removed from their land by force.

Damascus, the Aramean capital, was a place every Israelite knew. “Beyond” is hâlᵉʼâh, “to the distance”, far away. Past Damascus lay Mesopotamia and the rising empire of Assyria, which deported the peoples it conquered and scattered them far from home to break their identity as nations. The prophecy came true in 722 BC, when the king of Assyria took Samaria and carried Israel away (2 Kings 17:6). The law had warned of this from the start. Among the curses for breaking the covenant, Moses said that the LORD would scatter them among all people (Deuteronomy 28:64). So the exile shows God keeping his word in judgment as surely as he keeps it in blessing.

Why does God sign the sentence “The God of hosts”?

“Saith the LORD” marks the sentence as God’s own word, with Amos only its messenger. The LORD, Yᵉhôvâh, then gives his name as “The God of hosts”, joining ʼĕlôhîym, God, with tsâbâʼ, an army or host. He commands the armies of heaven and of earth and rules the nations and their history. The seraphim cry this same title in Isaiah’s vision: “Holy, holy, holy, is the LORD of hosts” (Isaiah 6:3). The one who pronounces the exile has every army at his command, Assyria’s included, so the sentence is certain.

Christ and the worship God accepts

The sacrifices Israel abused were always a shadow of something greater. They were unable to perfect the worshipper or take away sin (Hebrews 10:1–4). Jesus is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29). He offered himself once, the final and sufficient sacrifice (Hebrews 9:26–28), and his blood cleanses the conscience as the blood of animals never could (Hebrews 9:11–14). His offering was the opposite of an empty rite. It was an act of perfect obedience and love, “an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweetsmelling savour” (Ephesians 5:2), the pleasing aroma that Israel’s altars had ceased to send up.

Jesus also lived the justice and righteousness that Israel failed to show. He blessed those who “hunger and thirst after righteousness” (Matthew 5:6). In the synagogue he read Isaiah’s words about good news for the poor and liberty for the captives as his own mission (Isaiah 61:1–2, Luke 4:18–19), and he gave his followers the command to love one another as the mark by which they would be known (John 13:34–35). The righteousness God demands he also provides in Christ, who was made sin for us so that we might be made the righteousness of God in him (2 Corinthians 5:21).

Through him a new kind of worship is opened. Jesus said that the true worshippers worship the Father “in spirit and in truth” (John 4:23–24), and he is himself the way to the Father, the truth and the life (John 14:6). In the new covenant God writes his law on the hearts of his people (Jeremiah 31:31–34). Believers offer their own selves as living sacrifices (Romans 12:1–2), along with the sacrifice of praise, doing good and sharing with others, “for with such sacrifices God is well pleased” (Hebrews 13:15–16).

Christ answers the idols of verse 26 as well. He is the true Light (John 1:9), set against the star of a god that led Israel astray, and he claims an undivided heart: “No man can serve two masters” (Matthew 6:24). The gospel turns people “from idols to serve the living and true God” (1 Thessalonians 1:9–10).

Israel’s captivity also pictures the deeper exile of all people from God through sin, whose wages is death (Romans 6:23). The God of hosts who pronounced that judgment sent his Son to end it. At the cross Christ triumphed over the powers that held us (Colossians 2:15), and God has delivered us from the power of darkness and brought us into the kingdom of his dear Son, in whom we have redemption (Colossians 1:13–14). The story ends with the exile over for good, God dwelling with his people and wiping away every tear (Revelation 21:3–4).

Worship and life held together

This passage shows us a God who looks through our worship to the life behind it. Feasts, costly gifts and beautiful music all pass before him, and what he weighs is whether the people offering them deal justly, love their neighbour and belong to him alone. That is searching, and it is also good news about who God is. He cares how the poor are treated in the gate, and a full sanctuary does nothing to buy his silence about it.

The passage also gives us a way to test our own religion that is kinder than it first sounds. God is asking for something whole: a heart that seeks him, hands that do right, and songs that come from both. Attendance, giving and singing are his gifts, and they please him when they are the overflow of a life that is his through the week. The idols of verse 26 have quieter forms now, such as wealth, comfort, success and the approval of others, and anything that takes first place in our affection and trust is a god we have made for ourselves.

In Christ none of this is left as a bare demand. He is the sacrifice God accepted, and the Spirit he gives is the source of the stream Amos saw, so that justice and righteousness can flow from people who have first received righteousness as a gift. The plea that stands before this passage still stands: “Seek ye me, and ye shall live.”

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Amos 5:21–27. He set out his notes in a two-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 7 verses
Passage under commentAmos 5:21–27
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

The scope of these verses is to show how little God valued their shows of devotion, nay, how much he detested them, while they went on in their sins. Observe,

I.How unpleasing, nay, how displeasing, their hypocritical services were to God.

They had their feast-days at Bethel, in imitation of those at Jerusalem, in which they pretended to rejoice before God. They had their solemn assemblies for religious worship, in which they put on the gravity of those who come before God as his people come, and sit before him as his people sit. They offered to God burnt-offerings, to the honour of God, together with the meat-offerings which by the law were to be offered with them; they offered the peace-offerings, to implore the favour of God, and they offered them of the fat beasts that they had, Amos 5:21, Amos 5:22. In imitation likewise of the temple-music, they had the noise of their songs and the melody of their viols (Amos 5:23), vocal and instrumental music, with which they praised God. With these services they hoped to make God amends for the sins they had committed, and to obtain leave to go on in sin; and therefore they were so far from being acceptable to God that they were abominable. He hated, he despised, their feast-days, not only despised them as no valuable services done to him, but hated them as an affront and provocation to him, as we hate to see men dissemble with us, pretend a respect for us when really they have none. Nothing more hateful, more despicable, than hypocrisy. He that blesseth his friend with a loud voice, it shall be counted a curse, when it appears that his heart is not with him. God will not smell in their solemn assemblies, for there is nothing in them that is grateful to him, but a great deal that is offensive. Their sacrifices are not to him of a sweet smelling savour, as Noah's was, Genesis 8:21. He will not accept them; he will not regard them, will not take any notice of them; he will not hear the melody of their viols; for, when sin is a jar in the harmony, it grates in his ears: "Take it away," says God, "I cannot bear it." Now this intimates,

1.That sacrifice itself is of small account with God in comparison with moral duties; to love God and our neighbour is better than all burnt offering and sacrifice.

2.That the sacrifice of the wicked is really an abomination to him, Proverbs 15:8. Dissembled piety is double iniquity, and so it will be found when, if any place in hell be hotter than another, that will be the hypocrite's portion.

II.What it was that he required in order to the acceptableness of their sacrifices and without which no sacrifice would be acceptable (Amos 5:24): Let judgment run down as waters, among you, and righteousness as a mighty stream, that is 1. "Let there be a general reformation of manners among you; let religion (God's judgment) and righteousness have their due influence upon you; let your land be watered with it, and let it bear down all the opposition of vice and profaneness; let it run wide as overflowing waters, and yet run strong as might stream." (2.) "In particular, let justice be duly administered by magistrates and rulers; let not the current of it be stopped by partiality and bribery, but let it come freely as waters do, in the natural course; let it be pure as running waters, not muddied with corruption or whatever may pervert justice; let it run like a might stream, and not suffer itself to be obstructed, or its course retarded, by the fear of man; let all have free access to it as a common stream, and have benefit by it as trees planted by the rivers of waters." The great thing laid to Israel's charge was turning judgment into wormwood (Amos 5:7); in that matter therefore they must reform, Zechariah 7:9. This was what God desired more than sacrifices, Hosea 6:6; 1 Samuel 15:22.

III.What little stress God had laid upon the law of sacrifices, though it was his own law, in comparison with the moral precepts (Amos 5:25):

"Did you offer unto me sacrifices in the wilderness forty years? No, you did not." For the greatest part of that time sacrifice was very much neglected, because of the unsettledness of their state; after the second year, the passover was not kept till they came into Canaan, and other institutions were in like manner intermitted; and yet, because God will have mercy and not sacrifice, he never imputed the omission to them as their fault, but continued his care of them and kindness to them: it was not that, but their murmuring and unbelief, for which God was displeased with them. He that so owned his people, though they did not sacrifice, when in other things they kept close to him, will certainly disown them, though they do sacrifice, if in other things they depart from him. But, though ritual sacrifices may thus be dispensed with, spiritual sacrifices will not; even justice and honesty will not excuse for the want of prayer and praise, a broken heart and the love of God. Stephen quotes this passage (Acts 7:42), to show the Jews that they ought not to think it strange that ceremonial law was repealed when from the beginning it was comparatively made light of. Compare Jeremiah 7:22, Jeremiah 7:23.

II.What little reason they had to expect that their sacrifices should be acceptable to God, when they and their fathers had been all along addicted to the worship of other gods. So some take Amos 5:25, "Did you offer to me sacrifices, that is, to me only? No, and therefore not at all to me acceptably;" for the law of worshipping the Lord our God is, Him only we must serve. "But you have borne the tabernacle of your Moloch (Amos 5:26), little shrines that you made to carry about with you, pocket-idols for your private superstition, when you durst not be seen to do it publicly. You have had the images of your Moloch - your king" (probably representing the sun, that sits king among the heavenly bodies), "and Chiun, or Remphan" (as Stephen calls it, Acts 7:43, after the Septuagint), which it is supposed, represented Saturn, the highest of the seven planets. The worship of the sun, moon, and stars, was the most ancient, most general, and most plausible idolatry. They made to themselves the star of their God, some particular star which they took to be their god, or the name of which they gave to their god. This idolatry Israel was from the beginning prone to (Deuteronomy 4:19); and those that retain an affection for false gods cannot expect the favour of the true God.

V.What punishment God would inflict upon them for their persisting in idolatry (Amos 5:27):

I will cause you to go into captivity beyond Damascus. They were led captive by Satan into idolatry, and therefore God caused them to go into captivity among idolaters, and hurried them into a strange land, since they were so fond of strange gods. They were carried beyond Damascus. Their captivity by the Assyrians was far beyond that by the Syrians; for, if less judgments do not work that for which they were sent, God will send greater. Or the captivity of Israel under Shalmaneser was far beyond that of Damascus under Tiglath-pileser, and much more grievous and destructive, which was foretold Amos 1:5. For, as the sins of God's professing people are greater than the sins of others, so it may be expected that their punishments will be proportionable. We find the spoil of Damascus and that of Samaria carried off together by the king of Assyria, Isaiah 8:4. Stephen reads it, I will carry you away beyond Babylon (Acts 7:43), further than Judah shall be carried, so far further as not to return. And, to make this sentence appear both the more certain and the more dreadful, he that passes it calls himself the Lord, whose name is, The God of hosts, and who is therefore able to execute the sentence, having hosts at command.

Historical interpretation

Two Centuries of Reception

4 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

4 quotes · AD 407–651
Post-NiceneEarly Medieval
400500600

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

d. AD 407John ChrysostomPost-NiceneSourceDISCOURSES AGAINST JUDAIZING CHRISTIANS 4:6
This brings us to a conclusion on another matter of great importance. The observances regarding sacrifices, sabbaths, new moons, and all such things prescribed by the Jewish way of life of that day—they are not essential. Even when they were observed they could make no great contribution to virtue; nor when neglected could they make the excellent person worthless or degrade in any way the sanctity of his soul. People of old, while still on earth, manifested by their piety a way of life that rivals the way the angels live. Yet they followed none of these observances, they slew no beasts in sacrifice, they kept no fast, they made no display of fasting. They were so pleasing to God that they surpassed this fallen human nature of ours and, by the lives they lived, drew the whole world to a knowledge of God.
d. AD 420JeromePost-NiceneSourceCommentary on Amos
(Verse 24) And judgment will be revealed like water, and justice like a strong torrent. LXX: And it will roll like water, and justice like an impassable torrent. Just as water, when it flows downhill, uncovers what it previously covered and exposes it to the eyes of all, so will the judgment and justice of God, which once judged His own people, be revealed to all, and it will be carried like the strongest torrent. Whatever it seizes, it drags along with it, and it does not allow anything to stand in its way. But the judgment of the wicked is tossed like water according to the Septuagint; for it does not stand in one opinion, but is carried about by every wind of doctrine, condemning what it had once approved, and considering what it had formerly praised as worthless. Their justifications are compared not to pure and clear springs and rivers, but to turbid and muddy torrents, which do not have their own waters, but collect them from rocks, cliffs, and brambles. Whoever wishes to cross them will immediately be seized and thrown headlong, and with his feet overthrown, will not be able to say: He established my feet upon a rock (Ps. 123:5). For he will walk upon the sands, which do not have a foundation, and when he will be in danger, he will speak according to the Hebrews: A torrent has passed over my soul (Ps. 39:3). On the contrary, the judgments of the just are firm and unchanging, not flowing like water, and justice does not rush like an impassable torrent: The thoughts of the just are judgments (Prov. XII, 5).
d. AD 444Cyril of AlexandriaPost-NiceneSourceCommentary on Amos
And judgment shall roll down as water, and righteousness as an impassable torrent. The righteous verdict against them will be like an impassable torrent, that is, dragging away what falls into it and sparing nothing. For when God drives someone into destruction and troubles, who is the one who will save? Who is the one who will help and deliver from judgment? Or what way will there be, by which if one passed through, he might be outside of the evils? None at all. "For who will turn back the high hand?" And, "If he shuts a man in, who can open it?" according to what is written.
d. AD 651Braulio of ZaragozaEarly MedievalSourceLETTER 18
I am pierced by one wound and tortured with much grief, the bond of bitterness does not permit the tongue to perform its function, and it is easier to weep than to talk. Lo, one affliction comes upon another affliction and contrition upon contrition, “as if a man were to flee from a lion, and a bear should meet him,” or howl at being struck by a scorpion, “and a snake should bite him,” so completely am I dejected and afflicted with the misery of sorrow. I confess, madam, that every time I try to write to you about the passing of our lady Basilla of blessed memory, I am overcome with bitterness and experience a dullness in my mind, a heaviness in my sense and slowness in my tongue, because while I was occupied with grief, my mind was moved by death.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Amos 5:24 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8