Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
¶ But above all things, my brethren, swear not, neither by heaven, neither by the earth, neither by any other oath: but let your yea be yea; and your nay, nay; lest ye fall into condemnation.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
But G1161 above G4253 all things G3956, my G3450 brethren G80, swear G3660 not G3361, neither G3383 by heaven G3772, neither G3383 by the earth G1093, neither G3383 by any G5100 other G243 oath G3727: but G1161 let G2277 your G5216 yea G3483 be G2277 yea G3483; and G2532 your nay G3756, nay G3756; lest G3363 ye fall G4098 into G1519 condemnation G5272.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Above all, brothers, stop swearing oaths — not “By heaven,” not “By the earth,” and not by any other formula; rather, let your “Yes” be simply “Yes” and your “No” simply “No,” so that you won’t fall under condemnation.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Above all, my brothers, do not swear, not by heaven or earth or by any other oath. Simply let your “Yes” be yes, and your “No,” no, so that you will not fall under judgment.
Ask
American Standard Version
But above all things, my brethren, swear not, neither by the heaven, nor by the earth, nor by any other oath: but let your yea be yea, and your nay, nay; that ye fall not under judgment.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
But above all things, my brothers, don’t swear, neither by heaven, nor by the earth, nor by any other oath; but let your “yes” be “yes”, and your “no”, “no”; so that you don’t fall into hypocrisy.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
But before all thinges, my brethren, sweare not, neither by heauen, nor by earth, nor by any other othe: but let your yea, be yea, and your nay, nay, lest ye fall into condemnation.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And before all things, my brethren, do not swear, neither by the heaven, neither by the earth, neither by any other oath, and let your Yes be Yes, and the No, No; that under judgment ye may not fall.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

James 5:12 delivers a profound exhortation to believers, urging them to cultivate absolute integrity in their speech by refraining from all forms of oaths. Instead of relying on external vows, Christians are called to let their simple "yes" mean yes and their "no" mean no, ensuring their word is inherently trustworthy. This command serves as a foundational principle for genuine Christian living, warning against the spiritual peril of insincere or deceptive communication that could lead to condemnation.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: James 5:12 serves as a pivotal transition within the epistle, moving from a stern warning against the wealthy oppressors and a call for patient endurance in suffering (James 5:1-11) to practical ethical instructions concerning the believer's conduct. Immediately following this verse, James provides further guidance on prayer, confession, and anointing for healing (James 5:13-18). This instruction on speech integrity is deeply integrated into James's overarching theme: that genuine faith is not merely intellectual assent but is actively demonstrated through righteous living and practical obedience, particularly in areas like the control of the tongue, which he addresses extensively in James 3.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In the ancient world, and particularly within Jewish culture, oaths were commonly used to add weight and solemnity to promises or statements. People would swear by various entities, including heaven, earth, Jerusalem, or even their own heads, believing that invoking something sacred or powerful would bind their word more firmly. However, this practice often led to abuse, where individuals would use carefully worded oaths to evade truth or to make promises they had no intention of keeping. James's prohibition directly echoes the teaching of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount, indicating a consistent New Testament stance against such practices. For the Jewish Christians to whom James wrote, this would have been a direct challenge to ingrained cultural habits and a call to a higher standard of truthfulness.
  • Key Themes: James 5:12 powerfully contributes to several key themes prevalent throughout the epistle and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it underscores the theme of Integrity of Speech, asserting that a believer's word should be so reliable that no external validation is needed. This aligns with James's emphasis on the destructive power of the tongue and the need for its control, as seen in James 3:1-12. Secondly, it highlights Truthfulness as an essential characteristic of Christian faith, reflecting the very nature of God, who is truth. The simple command "let your yea be yea; and your nay, nay" demands an absolute commitment to honesty in all communication. Thirdly, the warning "lest ye fall into condemnation" points to the theme of Avoiding Hypocrisy and embracing authenticity, a recurring concern for James, who consistently calls for faith to be demonstrated through genuine actions rather than mere outward profession (James 1:22). Lastly, by forbidding oaths by creation, James implicitly reinforces God's Sovereignty over all things, echoing Jesus' teaching that one cannot make a single hair white or black (Matthew 5:36), thereby discouraging the flippant use of God's creation to validate human words.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • swear (Greek, omnȳō, G3660): This verb (G3660) refers to the act of taking an oath or making a solemn vow, often by invoking a higher power or sacred entity. In this context, it specifically prohibits the practice of binding oneself with an oath in everyday speech, implying that such an act is unnecessary for a person whose word is already trustworthy.
  • yea (Greek, naí, G3483): As a primary particle of strong affirmation (G3483), naí signifies a definitive "yes" or "verily." Its repetition ("yea be yea") is a Semitic idiom emphasizing absolute truthfulness, consistency, and reliability without any need for additional corroboration or embellishment.
  • condemnation (Greek, hypókrisis, G5272): This term (G5272) is derived from a word meaning "to act under a feigned part" or "to dissimulate." While often translated as "condemnation" in the KJV, its root meaning points to "hypocrisy" or "deceit." Thus, the warning "lest ye fall into condemnation" implies that engaging in insincere speech or oath-taking can lead one into a state of spiritual dissimulation, incurring divine judgment or the judgment of hypocrisy.

Verse Breakdown

  • "¶ But above all things, my brethren, swear not": James introduces this command with a strong emphasis ("above all things"), signaling its paramount importance for the Christian community. The address "my brethren" underscores the pastoral concern and familial bond within the church. The direct prohibition "swear not" sets the tone for absolute integrity in communication.
  • "neither by heaven, neither by the earth, neither by any other oath": This clause specifies the comprehensive nature of the prohibition, mirroring Jesus' teaching. It forbids swearing by any part of creation, whether celestial or terrestrial, or indeed by any other form of solemn vow. This highlights that all things belong to God and should not be used lightly to validate human speech.
  • "but let your yea be yea; and [your] nay, nay": This is the positive command that defines the standard for Christian speech. It is a Semitic idiom demanding simple, straightforward, and unwavering truthfulness. A believer's "yes" should unequivocally mean yes, and their "no" should unequivocally mean no, without any need for supplementary oaths or qualifications. Their word itself should be sufficient and reliable.
  • "lest ye fall into condemnation": This final phrase serves as a solemn warning against the spiritual consequences of failing to adhere to the command. "Condemnation" (G5272, hypókrisis) here implies falling into a state of hypocrisy or deceit, which carries the risk of divine judgment. It underscores the gravity of insincere speech and the importance of living a life of transparent truthfulness before God and others.

Literary Devices

James 5:12 employs several potent literary devices to convey its message with clarity and force. The phrase "above all things" functions as Hyperbole, emphasizing the supreme importance and priority of this command within the broader ethical framework James is presenting. The core instruction, "let your yea be yea; and [your] nay, nay," is a powerful example of Parallelism and Antithesis, creating a balanced structure that highlights the consistency required in speech and contrasts it with the untrustworthy nature of oaths. This specific phrasing is also a well-known Semitic Idiom, conveying the concept of absolute truthfulness and reliability without the need for external validation. Furthermore, the references to "heaven" and "earth" can be seen as a form of Merism, where two opposing parts represent the whole of creation, underscoring that nothing in God's domain should be invoked lightly to validate human words.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The theological implications of James 5:12 are profound, rooting the integrity of human speech in the very character of God. God Himself is the ultimate truth-teller, and His promises are always "yes" and "amen" in Christ. Therefore, for believers to emulate God's character, their words must be equally trustworthy and reliable. This command elevates everyday communication to a spiritual discipline, transforming it into an act of worship and witness. When a Christian's simple word is sufficient, it not only builds trust within the community but also serves as a powerful testimony to a watching world, demonstrating the transformative power of the Gospel. It challenges the common human tendency to embellish, exaggerate, or equivocate, calling for radical honesty that reflects the light of Christ.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

James 5:12 calls us to a radical commitment to truthfulness in every facet of our lives. In a world often characterized by ambiguity, spin, and broken promises, the Christian's word should stand out as a beacon of unwavering reliability. This means cultivating a reputation where our simple "yes" or "no" is enough, whether in personal conversations, business dealings, social media interactions, or public statements. It challenges us to examine our motivations for speaking, guarding against exaggeration, insincerity, or any form of deception that might subtly creep into our communication. By living this command, we not only build trust with others but, more importantly, we honor God, whose very nature is truth. Our integrity in speech becomes a powerful, silent witness to the transformative power of Christ in our lives, demonstrating that we are people of our word because we belong to the God of truth.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does my daily speech reflect the command to let my "yea be yea; and my nay, nay"?
  • In what situations am I tempted to exaggerate, embellish, or be less than fully truthful, and why?
  • How can I intentionally cultivate a reputation for unwavering honesty in all my interactions?
  • What impact would absolute truthfulness have on my relationships, professional life, and spiritual witness?

FAQ

Why does James forbid oaths when oaths are sometimes used in the Bible, even by God Himself?

Answer: James's prohibition, echoing Jesus' teaching in Matthew 5:33-37, targets the abuse of oaths in everyday speech, not all forms of solemn vows. God's oaths are perfect and self-validating, reflecting His unchanging nature and absolute truthfulness. Human oaths, however, were often used to add weight to a statement that might otherwise be doubted, or worse, to manipulate or evade truth. The point of James 5:12 is that a believer's word should always be so trustworthy that no external oath is needed to validate it. The command "let your yea be yea; and your nay, nay" means that our standard of truthfulness should be so high that our simple affirmation or denial is sufficient. This does not necessarily prohibit formal, legal oaths (e.g., in a court of law), where the purpose is to affirm truth before authority and God. Jesus Himself answered under oath before the high priest in Matthew 26:63-64, indicating that such contexts are distinct from the casual, often manipulative, oath-taking James condemns.

Does "condemnation" refer to human judgment, divine judgment, or something else?

Answer: The Greek word for "condemnation" (G5272, hypókrisis) in this context carries the primary meaning of "hypocrisy" or "deceit." Therefore, the warning "lest ye fall into condemnation" suggests a spiritual consequence: falling into a state of insincerity or dissimulation. This hypocrisy can lead to both a loss of credibility and trust among people, and more significantly, to divine judgment. God is a God of truth, and for His children to live in a state of deceit or insincerity is contrary to His nature and will. Thus, the condemnation refers primarily to the spiritual peril of living a life of hypocrisy, which ultimately incurs God's disapproval and judgment, as well as the negative consequences of a life lacking integrity.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

James's call for absolute truthfulness in speech finds its ultimate fulfillment and perfect embodiment in Jesus Christ. He is not merely a truth-teller but "the way, the truth, and the life" (John 14:6). Every word Jesus spoke was truth, and His life perfectly aligned with His declarations. He is the "Amen, the faithful and true witness" (Revelation 3:14), meaning His "yes" is the ultimate reality and guarantee of God's promises. In Christ, all of God's promises find their "Yes" and "Amen" (2 Corinthians 1:20), demonstrating that divine integrity is the foundation of all reality. As believers, we are called to reflect Christ's character, and this includes our speech. Our "yea" and "nay" should be so consistent and reliable that they bear witness to the One who is Truth incarnate, making oaths unnecessary because our word is rooted in His unwavering faithfulness.

Copy as

Commentary on James 5 verses 12–20

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

This epistle now drawing to a close, the penman goes off very quickly from one thing to another: hence it is that matters so very different are insisted on in these few verses.

I. The sin of swearing is cautioned against: But above all things, my brethren, swear not, etc., Jam 5:12. Some understand this too restrictedly, as if the meaning were, "Swear not at your persecutors, at those that reproach you and say all manner of evil of you; be not put into a passion by the injuries they do you, so as in your passion to be provoked to swear." This swearing is no doubt forbidden here: and it will not excuse those that are guilty of this sin to say they sear only when they are provoked to it, and before they are aware. But the apostle's warning extends to other occasions of swearing as well as this. Some have translated the words, pro pantōn - before all things; and so have made sense of this place to be that they should not, in common conversation, before every thing they say, put an oath. All customary needless swearing is undoubtedly forbidden, and all along in scripture condemned, as a very grievous sin. Profane swearing was very customary among the Jews, and, since this epistle is directed in general to the twelve tribes scattered abroad (as before has been observed), we may conceive this exhortation sent to those who believed not. It is hard to suppose that swearing should be one of the spots of God's children, since Peter, when he was charged with being a disciple of Christ and would disprove the charge, cursed and swore, thereby thinking most effectually to convince them that he was no disciple of Jesus, it being well known of such that they durst not allow themselves in swearing; but possibly some of the looser sort of those who were called Christians might, among other sins here charged upon them, be guilty also of this. It is a sin that in later years has most scandalously prevailed, even among those who would be thought above all others entitled to the Christian name and privileges. It is very rare indeed to hear of a dissenter from the church of England who is guilty of swearing, but among those who glory in their being of the established church nothing is more common; and indeed the most execrable oaths and curses now daily wound the ears and hearts of all serious Christians. James here says,

1.Above all things, swear not; but how many are there who mind this the least of all things, and who make light of nothing so much as common profane swearing! But why above all things is swearing here forbidden? (1.) Because it strikes most directly at the honour of God and most expressly throws contempt upon his name and authority. (2.) Because this sin has, of all sins, the least temptation to it: it is not gain, nor pleasure, nor reputation, that can move men to it, but a wantonness in sinning, and a needless showing an enmity to God. Thy enemies take thy name in vain, Psa 139:20. This is a proof of men's being enemies to God, however they may pretend to call themselves by his name, or sometimes to compliment him in acts of worship. (3.) Because it is with most difficulty left off when once men are accustomed to it, therefore it should above all things be watched against. And, (4.) "Above all things swear not, for how can you expect the name of God should be a strong tower to you in your distress if you profane it and play with it at other times?" But (as Mr. Baxter observes) "all this is so far from forbidding necessary oaths that it is but to confirm them, by preserving the due reverence of them." And then he further notes that "The true nature of an oath is, by our speech, to pawn the reputation of some certain or great thing, for the averring of a doubted less thing; and not (as is commonly held) an appeal to God or other judge." Hence it was that swearing by the heavens, and by the earth, and by the other oaths the apostle refers to, came to be in use. The Jews thought if they did but omit the great oath of Chi-Eloah, they were safe. But they grew so profane as to swear by the creature, as if it were God; and so advanced it into the place of God; while, on the other hand, those who swear commonly and profanely by the name of God do hereby put him upon the level with every common thing.

2.But let your yea be yea, and your nay nay; lest you fall into condemnation; that is, "let it suffice you to affirm or deny a thing as there is occasion, and be sure to stand to your word, an be true to it, so as to give no occasion for your being suspected of falsehood; and then you will be kept from the condemnation of backing what you say or promise by rash oaths, and from profaning the name of God to justify yourselves. It is being suspected of falsehood that leads men to swearing. Let it be known that your keep to truth, and are firm to your word, and by this means you will find there is no need to swear to what you say. Thus shall you escape the condemnation which is expressly annexed to the third commandment: The Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain."

II. As Christians we are taught to suit ourselves to the dispensations of Providence (Jam 5:13): Is any among you afflicted? Let him pray. Is any merry? Let him sing psalms. Our condition in this world is various; and our wisdom is to submit to its being so, and to behave as becomes us both in prosperity and under affliction. Sometimes we are in sadness, sometimes in mirth; God has set these one over against the other that we may the better observe the several duties he enjoins, and that the impressions made on our passions and affections may be rendered serviceable to our devotions. Afflictions should put us upon prayer, and prosperity should make us abound in praise. Not that prayer is to be confined to a time of trouble, nor singing to a time of mirth; but these several duties may be performed with special advantage, and to the happiest purposes, at such seasons. 1. In a day of affliction nothing is more seasonable than prayer. The person afflicted must pray himself, as well as engage the prayers of others for him. Times of affliction should be praying times. To this end God sends afflictions, that we may be engaged to seek him early; and that those who at other times have neglected him may be brought to enquire after him. The spirit is then most humble, the heart is broken and tender; and prayer is most acceptable to God when it comes from a contrite humble spirit. Afflictions naturally draw out complaints; and to whom should we complain but to God in prayer? It is necessary to exercise faith and hope under afflictions; and prayer is the appointed means both for obtaining and increasing these graces in us. Is any afflicted? Let him pray. 2. In a day of mirth and prosperity singing psalms is very proper and seasonable. In the original it is only said sing, psalletō, without the addition of psalms or any other word: and we learn from the writings of several in the first ages of Christianity (particularly from a letter of Pliny's, and from some passages in Justin Martyr and Tertullian) that the Christians were accustomed to sing hymns, either taken out of scripture, or of more private composure, in their worship of God. Though some have thought that Paul's advising both the Colossians and Ephesians to speak to one another psalmois kai humnois kai ōdais pneumatikais - in psalms, and hymns, and spiritual songs, refers only to the compositions of scripture, the psalms of David being distinguished in Hebrew by Shurim, Tehillim, and Mizmorim, words that exactly answer these of the apostle. Let that be as it will, this however we are sure of, that the singing of psalms is a gospel ordinance, and that our joy should be holy joy, consecrated to God. Singing is so directed to here as to show that, if any be in circumstances of mirth and prosperity, he should turn his mirth, though alone, and by himself, in this channel. Holy mirth becomes families and retirements, as well as public assemblies. Let our singing be such as to make melody with our hearts unto the Lord, and God will assuredly be well pleased with this kind of devotion.

III. We have particular directions given as to sick persons, and healing pardoning mercy promised upon the observance of those directions. If any be sick, they are required, 1. To send for the elders, presbuterous tēs ekkēsias - the presbyters, pastors or ministers of the church, Jam 5:14, Jam 5:15. It lies upon sick people as a duty to send for ministers, and to desire their assistance and their prayers. 2. It is the duty of ministers to pray over the sick, when thus desired and called for. Let them pray over him; let their prayers be suited to his case, and their intercessions be as becomes those who are affected wit his calamities. 3. In the times of miraculous healing, the sick were to be anointed with oil in the name of the Lord. Expositors generally confine this anointing with oil to such as had the power of working miracles; and, when miracles ceased, this institution ceased also. In Mark's gospel we read of the apostle's anointing with oil many that were sick, and healing them, Mar 6:13. And we have accounts of this being practiced in the church two hundred years after Christ; but then the gift of healing also accompanied it, and, when the miraculous gift ceased, this rite was laid aside. The papists indeed have made a sacrament of this, which they call the extreme unction. They use it, not to heal the sick, as it was used by the apostles; but as they generally run counter to scripture, in the appointments of their church, so here they ordain that this should be administered only to such as are at the very point of death. The apostle's anointing was in order to heal the disease; the popish anointing is for the expulsion of the relics of sin, and to enable the soul (as they pretend) the better to combat with the powers of the air. When they cannot prove, by any visible effects, that Christ owns them in the continuance of this rite, they would however have people to believe that the invisible effects are very wonderful. But it is surely much better to omit this anointing with oil than to turn it quite contrary to the purposes spoken of in scripture. Some protestants have thought that this anointing was only permitted or approved by Christ, not instituted. But it should seem, by the words of James here, that it was a thing enjoined in cases where there was faith for healing. And some protestants have argued for it with this view. It was not to be commonly used, not even in the apostolical age; and some have thought that it should not be wholly laid aside in any age, but that where there are extraordinary measures of faith in the person anointing, and in those who are anointed, an extraordinary blessing may attend the observance of this direction for the sick. However that be, there is one thing carefully to be observed here, that the saving of the sick is not ascribed to the anointing with oil, but to prayer: The prayer of faith shall save the sick, etc., Jam 5:15. So that, 4. Prayer over the sick must proceed fRom. and be accompanied with, a lively faith. There must be faith both in the person praying and in the person prayed for. In a time of sickness, it is not the cold and formal prayer that is effectual, but the prayer of faith. 5. We should observe the success of prayer. The Lord shall raise up; that is, if he be a person capable and fit for deliverance, and if God have any thing further for such a person to do in the world. And, if he have committed sins, they shall be forgiven him; that is, where sickness is sent as a punishment for some particular sin, that sin shall be pardoned, and in token thereof the sickness shall be removed. As when Christ said to the impotent man, Go and sin no more, lest a worse thing come unto thee, it is intimated that some particular sin was the cause of his sickness. The great thing therefore we should beg of God for ourselves and others in the time of sickness is the pardon of sin. Sin is both the root of sickness and the sting of it. If sin be pardoned, either affliction shall be removed in mercy or we shall see there is mercy in the continuance of it. When healing is founded upon pardon, we may say as Hezekiah did: Thou hast, in love to my soul, delivered it from the pit of corruption, Isa 38:17. When you are sick and in pain, it is most common to pray and cry, O give me ease! O restore me to health! But your prayer should rather and chiefly be, O that God would pardon my sins!

IV. Christians are directed to confess their faults one to another, and so to join in their prayers with an for one another, Jam 5:16. Some expositors connect this with Jam 5:14. As if when sick people send for ministers to pray over them they should then confess their faults to them. Indeed, where any are conscious that their sickness is a vindictive punishment of some particular sin, and they cannot look for the removal of their sickness without particular applications to God for the pardon of such a sin, there it may be proper to acknowledge and tell his case, that those who pray over him may know how to plead rightly for him. But the confession here required is that of Christians to one another, and not, as the papists would have it, to a priest. Where persons have injured one another, acts of injustice must be confessed to those against whom they have been committed. Where persons have tempted one another to sin or have consented in the same evil actions, there they ought mutually to blame themselves and excite each other to repentance. Where crimes are of a public nature, and have done any public mischief, there they ought to be more publicly confessed, so as may best reach to all who are concerned. And sometimes it may be well to confess our faults to some prudent minister or praying friend, that he may help us to plead with God for mercy and pardon. But then we are not to think that James puts us upon telling every thing that we are conscious is amiss in ourselves or in one another; but so far as confession is necessary to our reconciliation with such as are at variance with us, or for gaining information in any point of conscience and making our own spirits quiet and easy, so far we should be ready to confess our faults. And sometimes also it may be of good use to Christians to disclose their peculiar weaknesses and infirmities to one another, where there are great intimacies and friendships, and where they may help each other by their prayers to obtain pardon of their sins and power against them. Those who make confession of their faults one to another should thereupon pray with and for one another. The Jam 5:13 directs persons to pray for themselves: Is any afflicted let him pray; the Jam 5:14 directs to seek for the prayers of ministers; and the Jam 5:16 directs private Christians to pray one for another; so that here we have all sorts of prayer (ministerial, social, and secret) recommended.

V. The great advantage and efficacy of prayer are declared and proved: The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much, whether he pray for himself or for others: witness the example of Elias, Jam 5:17, Jam 5:18. He who prays must be a righteous man; not righteous in an absolute sense (for this Elias was not, who is here made a pattern to us), but righteous in a gospel sense; not loving nor approving of any iniquity. If I regard iniquity in my heart, the Lord will not hear my prayer, Psa 66:18. Further, the prayer itself must be a fervent, in-wrought, well-wrought prayer. It must be a pouring out of the heart to God; and it must proceed from a faith unfeigned. Such prayer avails much. It is of great advantage to ourselves, it may be very beneficial to our friends, and we are assured of its being acceptable to God. It is good having those for friends whose prayers are available in the sight of God. The power of prayer is here proved from the success of Elijah. This may be encouraging to us even in common cases, if we consider that Elijah was a man of like passions with us. He was a zealous good man and a very great man, but he had his infirmities, and was subject to disorder in his passions as well as others. In prayer we must not look to the merit of man, but to the grace of God. Only in this we should copy after Elijah, that he prayed earnestly, or, as it is in the original, in prayer he prayed. It is not enough to say a prayer, but we must pray in prayer. Our thoughts must be fixed, our desires firm and ardent, and our graces in exercise; and, when we thus pray in prayer, we shall speed in prayer. Elijah prayed that it might not rain; and God heard him in his pleading against an idolatrous persecuting country, so that it rained not on the earth for the space of three years and six months. Again he prayed, and the heaven gave rain, etc. Thus you see prayer is the key which opens and shuts heaven. To this there is an allusion, Rev 11:6, where the two witnesses are said to have power to shut heaven, that it rain not. This instance of the extraordinary efficacy of prayer is recorded for encouragement even to ordinary Christians to be instant and earnest in prayer. God never says to any of the seed of Jacob, Seek my face in vain. If Elijah by prayer could do such great and wonderful things, surely the prayers of no righteous man shall return void. Where there may not be so much of a miracle in God's answering our prayers, yet there may be as much of grace.

VI. This epistle concludes with an exhortation to do all we can in our places to promote the conversion and salvation of others, Jam 5:19, Jam 5:20. Some interpret these verses as an apology which the apostle is making for himself that he should so plainly and sharply reprove the Jewish Christians for their many faults and errors. And certainly James gives a very good reason why he was so much concerned to reclaim them from their errors, because in thus doing he should save souls, and hide a multitude of sins. But we are not to restrain this place to the apostle's converting such as erred from the truth; no, nor to other ministerial endeavours of the like nature, since it is said, "If any err, and one convert him, let him be who he will that does so good an office for another, he is therein an instrument of saving a soul from death." Those whom the apostle here calls brethren, he yet supposes liable to err. It is no mark of a wise or a holy man to boast of his being free from error, or to refuse to acknowledge when he is in an error. But if any do err, be they ever so great, you must not be afraid to show them their error; and, be they ever so weak and little, you must not disdain to make them wiser and better. If they err from the truth, that is, from the gospel (the great rule and standard of truth), whether it be in opinion or practice, you must endeavour to bring them again to the rule. Errors in judgment and in life generally go together. There is some doctrinal mistake at the bottom of every practical miscarriage. There is no one habitually bad, but upon some bad principle. Now to convert such is to reduce them from their error, and to reclaim them from the evils they have been led into. We are not presently to accuse and exclaim against an erring brother, and seek to bring reproaches and calamities upon him, but to convert him: and, if by all our endeavours we cannot do this, yet we are nowhere empowered to persecute and destroy him. If we are instrumental in the conversion of any, we are said to convert them, though this be principally and efficiently the work of God. And, if we can do no more towards the conversion of sinners, yet we may do this - pray for the grace and Spirit of God to convert and change them. And let those that are in any way serviceable to convert others know what will be the happy consequence of their doing this: they may take great comfort in it at present, and they will meet with a crown at last. He that is said to err from the truth in Jam 5:19 is described as erring in his way in Jam 5:20, and we cannot be said to convert any merely by altering their opinions, unless we can bring them to correct and amend their ways. This is conversion - to turn a sinner from the error of his ways, and not to turn him from one party to another, or merely from one notion and way of thinking to another. He who thus converteth a sinner from the error of his ways shall save a soul from death. There is a soul in the case; and what is done towards the salvation of the soul shall certainly turn to good account. The soul being the principal part of the man, the saving of that only is mentioned, but it includes the salvation of the whole man: the spirit shall be saved from hell, the body raised from the grave, and both saved from eternal death. And then, by such conversion of heart and life, a multitude of sins shall be hid. A most comfortable passage of scripture is this. We learn hence that though our sins are many, even a multitude, yet they may be hid or pardoned; and that when sin is turned from or forsaken it shall be hid, never to appear in judgment against us. Let people contrive to cover or excuse their sin as they will, there is no way effectually and finally to hide it but by forsaking it. Some make the sense of this text to be, that conversion shall prevent a multitude of sins; and it is a truth beyond dispute that many sins are prevented in the party converted, many also may be prevented in others that he may have an influence upon, or may converse with. Upon the whole, how should we lay out ourselves with all possible concern for the conversion of sinners! It will be for the happiness and salvation of the converted; it will prevent much mischief, and the spreading and multiplying of sin in the world; it will be for the glory and honour of God; and it will mightily redound to our comfort and renown in the great day. Those that turn many to righteousness, and those who help to do so, shall shine as the stars for ever and ever.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 12–20. Public domain.
Copy as
John ChrysostomAD 407
CATENA
What if someone swears an oath and claims that he was forced to do so? The fear of God is more powerful than any force. For though you may start out by swearing all kinds of promises, you will not keep any of them. Moreover, you would not dare to swear or give an oath in matters of human law, which you accept whether you want to or not. You would certainly never claim that you were forced into doing so. Now the person who has heard the blessings of God and who has prepared himself as Christ has commanded will never claim any need to do anything of the kind, for he is respected and honored by all. What is needed beyond a simple yes and no? An oath adds nothing to these, for no one has to be told that evil is the source of both excess and its deficient opposite. An oath is a form of excess.
Cyril of AlexandriaAD 444
CATENA
Let the witness of our life be stronger than an oath, and if some shameless person dares to ask an oath from you, let your yes be yes and your no be no, instead of swearing an oath. James forbids us to swear by heaven or by earth for this reason, that we should not give the creation more value than it has by deifying it. For those who swear, swear by something greater than themselves, as the apostle says.
Leander of SevilleAD 601
THE TRAINING OF NUNS 29 (19)
Jesus said: “Let your yes be yes and your no, no.” Any more than this is evil. So do not swear for good reason, because that is evil. It is said to be evil because the need of an oath comes from an unsure conscience. It is necessary to extract an oath from one whose sincerity is in doubt, but why should you bind yourself by an involuntary oath when you are bound to show with your lips the sincerity of your heart? Speak the truth from your heart and you will not need an oath.
BedeAD 735
Homilies on the Gospels 2.23
This is the judgment to which Herod fell victim, so that he found that he had either to break his oath or commit another shameful act in order to avoid breaking it.
OecumeniusAD 990
Commentary on James
But above all, my brothers, do not swear, neither by heaven, nor by earth, nor by any other oath. But let your yes be yes, and your no be no, so that you do not fall into hypocrisy.
But someone will say: If someone is compelled to swear, what should be done? We say that the fear of God will be stronger than the necessity imposing force. However, someone might doubt, since the old law holds that those who swear by the name of the Lord are worthy of praise, how does grace forbid this? Therefore, we say that the old law, leading the Jews not to swear by idols, commanded them to swear by God: just as it also commanded them to sacrifice to God, withdrawing them from sacrificing to idols: where it sufficiently taught the worship of God, then it also rejected sacrifices as useless: not seeking the sacrifice of animals, but a repentant soul as a sacrifice. But what is that? It is one that is entirely set ablaze with the fire of love through the modesty of the spirit, such as was also the soul of Paul, who, because some of the faithful were offended, was wondrously kindled.
"But let your yes be yes." This means your deposit should be firm and reaffirmed, and denial in those things that do not correspond to the act.
"That they may not fall into hypocrisy." The term hypocrisy refers to condemnation, that is, the condemnation that follows those who incessantly and without selection swear: and by the habit of swearing, they are led to perjury. Or even the term hypocrisy in this context has a specific meaning (for example, simulation) which is different from what it appears. How then does one who swears fall into hypocrisy? For in swearing, one is believed to be truthful, but by subsequent transgression, he is found to be lying instead of truthful. Or also because ναὶ, that is yes, is not presented for confirmation, nor is οὐ, that is no, in response to what does not correspond to the act. However, swearing by God is prohibited because of perjury; but swearing by heaven and the rest, so that these may not be referred to divine honor. For whoever swears, swears by the greater.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying James 5:12 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.