See on the biblical-era map



Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Acts 17:22–31. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
We have here St. Paul's sermon at Athens. Divers sermons we have had, which the apostles preached to the Jews, or such Gentiles as had an acquaintance with and veneration for the Old Testament, and were worshippers of the true and living God; and all they had to do with them was to open and allege that Jesus is the Christ; but here we have a sermon to heathens, that worshipped false gods, and were without the true God in the world, and to them the scope of their discourse was quite different from what it was to the other. In the former case their business was to lead their hearers by prophecies and miracles to the knowledge of the Redeemer, and faith in him; in the latter it was to lead them by the common works of providence to the knowledge of the Creator, and the worship of him. One discourse of this kind we had before to the rude idolaters of Lystra that deified the apostles (Act 14:15); this recorded here is to the more polite and refined idolaters at Athens, and an admirable discourse it is, and every way suited to his auditory and the design he had upon them.
I.He lays down this, as the scope of his discourse, that he aimed to bring them to the knowledge of the only living and true God, as the sole and proper object of their adoration. He is here obliged to lay the foundation, and to instruct them in the first principle of all religion, that there is a God, and that God is but one. When he preached against the gods they worshipped, he had no design to draw them to atheism, but to the service of the true Deity. Socrates, who had exposed the pagan idolatry, was indicted in this very court, and condemned, not only because he did not esteem those to be gods whom the city esteemed to be so, but because he introduced new demons; and this was the charge against Paul. Now he tacitly owns the former part of the charge, but guards against the latter, by declaring that he does not introduce any new gods, but reduce them to the knowledge of one God, the Ancient of days. Now,
1.He shows them that they needed to be instructed herein; for they had lost the knowledge of the true God that made them, in the worship of false gods that they had made (Deos qui rogat ille facit - He who worships the gods makes them): I perceive that in all things you are too superstitious. The crime he charges upon them is giving that glory to others which is due to God only, that they feared and worshipped demons, spirits that they supposed inhabited the images to which they directed their worship. "It is time for you to be told that there is but one God who are multiplying deities above any of your neighbours, and mingle your idolatries with all your affairs. You are in all things too superstitious - deisidaimonesteroî you easily admit every thing that comes under a show of religion, but it is that which corrupts it more and more; I bring you that which will reform it." Their neighbours praised them for this as a pious people, but Paul condemns them for it. Yet it is observable how he mollifies the charge, does not aggravate it, to provoke them. He uses a word which among them was taken in a good sense: You are every way more than ordinarily religious, so some read it; you are very devout in your way. Or, if it be taken in a bad sense, it is mitigated: "You are as it were (hōs) more superstitious than you need be;" and he says no more than what he himself perceived; theōrō - I see it, I observe it. They charged Paul with setting forth new demons: "Nay," says he, "you have demons enough already; I will not add to the number of them."
2.He shows them that they themselves had given a fair occasion for the declaring of this one true God to them, by setting up an altar, To the unknown God, which intimated an acknowledgment that there was a God who was yet to them an unknown God; and it is sad to think that at Athens, a place which was supposed to have the monopoly of wisdom, the true God was an unknown God, the only God that was unknown. "Now you ought to bed Paul welcome, for this is the God whom he comes to make known to you, the God whom you tacitly complain that you are ignorant of." There, where we are sensible we are defective and come short, just there, the gospel takes us up, and carries us on.
(1.)Various conjectures the learned have concerning this altar dedicated to the unknown God.
[1.]Some think the meaning is, To the God whose honour it is to be unknown, and that they intended the God of the Jews, whose name is ineffable, and whose nature is unsearchable. It is probable they had heard from the Jews, and from the writings of the Old Testament, of the God of Israel, who had proved himself to be above all gods, but was a God hiding himself, Isa 45:15. The heathen called the Jews' God, Deus incertus, incertum Mosis Numen - an uncertain God, the uncertain Deity of Moses, and the God without name. Now this God, says Paul, this God, who cannot by searching be found out to perfection, I now declare unto you.
[2.]Others think the meaning is, To the God whom it is our unhappiness not to know, which intimates that they would think it their happiness to know him. Some tell us that upon occasion of a plague that raged at Athens, when they had sacrificed to all their gods one after another for the staying of the plague, they were advised to let some sheep go where they pleased, and, where they lay down, to build an altar, tō prosēkonti Theō - to the proper God, or the God to whom that affair of staying the pestilence did belong; and, because they knew not how to call him, they inscribed it, To the unknown God. Others, from some of the best historians of Athens, tell us they had many altars inscribed, To the gods of Asia, Europe, and Africa - To the unknown God: and some of the neighbouring countries used to swear by the God that was unknown at Athens; so Lucian.
(2.)Observe, how modestly Paul mentions this. That he might not be thought a spy, nor one that had intruded himself more than became a stranger into the knowledge of their mysteries, he tells them that he observed it as he passed by, and saw their devotions, or their sacred things. It was public, and he could not forbear seeing it, and it was proper enough to make his remarks upon the religion of the place; and observe how prudently and ingeniously he takes occasion from this to bring in his discourse of the true God. [1.] He tells them that the God he preached to them was one that they did already worship, and therefore he was not a setter forth of new or strange gods: "As you have a dependence upon him, so he has had some kind of homage from you." [2.] He was one whom they ignorantly worshipped, which was a reproach to them, who were famous all the world over for their knowledge. "Now," says he, "I come to take away that reproach, that you may worship him understandingly whom how you worship ignorantly; and it cannot but be acceptable to have your blind devotion turned into a reasonable service, that you may not worship you know not what."
II.He confirms his doctrine of one living and true God, by his works of creation and providence:
"The God whom I declare unto you to be the sole object of your devotion, and call you to the worship of, is the God that made the world and governs it; and, by the visible proofs of these, you may be led to this invisible Being, and be convinced of his eternal power and Godhead." The Gentiles in general, and the Athenians particularly, in their devotions were governed, not by their philosophers, many of whom spoke clearly and excellently well of one supreme Numen, of his infinite perfections and universal agency and dominion (witness the writings of Plato, and long after of Cicero); but by their poets, and their idle fictions. Homer's works were the Bible of the pagan theology, or demonology rather, not Plato's; and the philosophers tamely submitted to this, rested in their speculations, disputed them among themselves, and taught them to their scholars, but never made the use they ought to have made of them in opposition to idolatry; so little certainty were they at concerning them, and so little impression did these things make upon them! Nay, they ran themselves into the superstition of their country, and thought they ought to do so. Eamus ad communem errorem - Let us embrace the common error. Now Paul here sets himself, in the first place, to reform the philosophy of the Athenians (he corrects the mistakes of that), and to give them right notions of the one only living and true God, and then to carry the matter further than they ever attempted for the reforming of their worship, and the bringing them off from their polytheism and idolatry. Observe what glorious things Paul here says of that God whom he served, and would have them to serve.
1.He is the God that made the world, and all things therein; the Father almighty, the Creator of heaven and earth. This was admitted by many of the philosophers; but those of Aristotle's school denied it, and maintained "that the world was from eternity, and every thing always was from eternity, and every thing always was what now it is." Those of the school of Epicurus fancied "that the world was made by a fortuitous concourse of atoms, which, having been in perpetual motion, at length accidentally jumped into this frame." Against both these Paul here maintains that God by the operations of an infinite power, according to the contrivance of an infinite wisdom, in the beginning of time made the world and all things therein, the origin of which was owing, not as they fancied to an eternal matter, but to an eternal mind.
2.He is therefore Lord of heaven and earth, that is, he is the rightful owner, proprietor, and possessor, of all the beings, powers, and riches of the upper and lower world, material and immaterial, visible and invisible. This follows from his making heaven and earth. If he created all, without doubt he has the disposing of all: and, where he gives being, he has an indisputable right to give law.
3.He is, in a particular manner, the Creator of men, of all men (Act 17:26): He made of one blood all nations of men. He made the first man, he makes every man, is the former of every man's body and the Father of every man's spirit. He has made the nations of men, not only all men in the nations, but as nations in their political capacity; he is their founder, and disposed them into communities for their mutual preservation and benefit. He made them all of one blood, of one and the same nature; he fashions their heart alike. Descended from one and the same common ancestor, in Adam they are all akin, so they are in Noah, that hereby they might be engaged in mutual affection and assistance, as fellow-creatures and brethren. Have we not all one Father? Hath not one God created us? Mal 2:10. He hath made them to dwell on all the face of the earth, which, as a bountiful benefactor, he has given, with all its fulness, to the children of men. He made them not to live in one place, but to be dispersed over all the earth; one nation therefore ought not to look with contempt upon another, as the Greeks did upon all other nations; for those on all the face of the earth are of the same blood. The Athenians boasted that they sprung out of their own earth, were aborigines, and nothing akin by blood to any other nation, which proud conceit of themselves the apostle here takes down.
4.That he is the great benefactor of the whole creation (Act 17:25): He giveth to all life, and breath, and all things. He not only breathed into the first man the breath of life, but still breathes it into every man. He gave us these souls he formed the spirit of man within him. He not only gave us our life and breath, when he brought us into being, but he is continually giving them to us; his providence is a continued creation; he holds our souls in life; every moment our breath goes forth, but he graciously gives it us again the next moment; it is no only his air that we breathe in, but it is in his hand that our breath is, Dan 5:23. He gives to all the children of men their life and breath; for as the meanest of the children of men live upon him, and receive from him, so the greatest, the wisest philosophers and mightiest potentates, cannot live without him. He gives to all, not only to all the children of men, but to the inferior creatures, to all animals, every thing wherein is the breath of life (Gen 6:17); they have their life and breath from him, and where he gives life and breath he gives all things, all other things needful for the support of life. The earth is full of his goodness, Psa 104:24, Psa 104:27.
5.That he is the sovereign disposer of all the affairs of the children of men, according to the counsel of his will (Act 17:26): He hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation. See here,
(1.)The sovereignty of God's disposal concerning us: he hath determined every event, horisas, the matter is fixed; the disposals of Providence are incontestable and must not be disputed, unchangeable and cannot be altered.
(2.)The wisdom of his disposals; he hath determined what was before appointed. The determinations of the Eternal Mind are not sudden resolves, but the counterparts of an eternal counsel, the copies of divine decrees. He performeth the thing that is appointed for me, Job 23:14. Whatever comes forth from God was before all worlds hid in God.
(3.)The things about which his providence is conversant; these are time and place: the times and places of our living in this world are determined and appointed by the God that made us.
[1.]He has determined the times that are concerning us. Times to us seem changeable, but God has fixed them. Our times are in his hand, to lengthen or shorten, embitter or sweeten, as he pleases. He has appointed and determined the time of our coming into the world, and the time of our continuance in the world; our time to be born, and our time to die (Ecc 3:1, Ecc 3:2), and all that little that lies between them - the time of all our concernments in this world. Whether they be prosperous times or calamitous times, it is he that has determined them; and on him we must depend, with reference to the times that are yet before us.
[2.]He has also determined and appointed the bounds of our habitation. He that appointed the earth to be a habitation for the children of men has appointed to the children of men a distinction of habitations upon the earth, has instituted such a thing as property, to which he has set bounds to keep us from trespassing one upon another. The particular habitations in which our lot is cast, the place of our nativity and of our settlement, are of God's determining and appointing, which is a reason why we should accommodate ourselves to the habitations we are in, and make the best of that which is.
6.That he is not far from every one of us, Act 17:27. He is every where present, not only is at our right hand, but has possessed our reins (Psa 139:13), has his eye upon us at all times, and knows us better than we know ourselves. Idolaters made images of God, that they might have him with them in those images, the absurdity of which the apostle here shows; for he in an infinite Spirit, that is not far from any of us, and never the nearer, but in one sense the further off from us, for our pretending to realize or presentiate him to ourselves by any image. He is nigh unto us, both to receive the homage we render him and to give the mercies we ask of him, wherever we are, though near no altar, image, or temple. The Lord of all, as he is rich (Rom 10:12), so he is nigh (Deu 4:7), to all that call upon him. He that wills us to pray every where, assures us that he is no where far from us; whatever country, nation, or profession we are of, whatever our rank and condition in the world are, be we in a palace or in a cottage, in a crowd or in a corner, in a city or in a desert, in the depths of the sea or afar off upon the sea, this is certain, God is not far from every one of us.
7.That in him we live, and move, and have our being, Act 17:28. We have a necessary and constant dependence upon his providence, as the streams have upon the spring, and the beams upon the sun.
(1.)In him we live; that is, the continuance of our lives is owing to him and the constant influence of his providence; he is our life, and the length of our days. It is not only owing to his patience and pity that our forfeited lives are not cut off, but it is owing to his power, and goodness, and fatherly care, that our frail lives are prolonged. There needs not a positive act of his wrath to destroy us; if he suspend the positive acts of his goodness, we die of ourselves.
(2.)In him we move; it is by the uninterrupted concourse of his providence that our souls move in their outgoings and operations, that our thoughts run to and fro about a thousand subjects, and our affections run out towards their proper objects. It is likewise by him that our souls move our bodies; we cannot stir a hand, or foot, or a tongue, but by him, who, as he is the first cause, so he is the first mover.
(3.)In him we have our being; not only from him we had it at first, but in him we have it still; to his continued care and goodness we owe it, not only that we have a being and are not sunk into nonentity, but that we have our being, have this being, were and still are of such a noble rank of beings, capable of knowing and enjoying God; and are not thrust into the meanness of brutes, nor the misery of devils.
8.That upon the whole matter we are God's offspring; he is our Father that begat us (Deu 32:6, Deu 32:18), and he hath nourished and brought us up as children, Isa 1:2. The confession of an adversary in such a case is always looked upon to be of use as argumentum ad hominem - an argument to the man, and therefore the apostle here quotes a saying of one of the Greek poets, Aratus, a native of Cilicia, Paul's countryman, who, in his Phenomena, in the beginning of his book, speaking of the heathen Jupiter, that is, in the poetical dialect, the supreme God, says this of him, tou gar kai genos esmen - for we are also his offspring. And he might have quoted other poets to the purpose of what he was speaking, that in God we live and move: -
Spiritus intus alit, totamque infusa per artus
Mens agitat molem.
This active mind, infus'd through all the space,
Unites and mingles with the mighty mass.
- Virgil, Aeneid 6
Est Deus in nobis, agitante calescimus illo.
'Tis the Divinity that warms our hearts.
- Ovid, Fast. 6
Jupiter est quodeunque vides,
Quocunque moveris.
Where'er you look, where'er you rove
'The spacious scene is full of Jove.
- Lucan, lib. 2
But he chooses this of Aratus, as having much in a little. By this it appears not only that Paul was himself a scholar, but that human learning is both ornamental and serviceable to a gospel minister, especially for the convincing of those that are without; for it enables him to beat them at their own weapons, and to cut off Goliath's head with his own sword. How can the adversaries of truth be beaten out of their strong-holds by those that do not know them? It may likewise shame God's professing people, who forget their relation to God, and walk contrary to it, that a heathen poet could say of God, We are his offspring, formed by him, formed for him, more the care of his providence than ever any children were the care of their parents; and therefore are obliged to obey his commands, and acquiesce in his disposals, and to be unto him for a name and a praise. Since in him and upon him we live, we ought to live to him; since in him we move, we ought to move towards him; and since in him we have our being, and from him we receive all the supports and comforts of our being, we ought to consecrate our being to him, and to apply to him for a new being, a better being, an eternal well-being.
III.From all these great truths concerning God, he infers the absurdity of their idolatry, as the prophets of old had done. If this be so,
1.Then God cannot be represented by an image. If we are the offspring of God, as we are spirits in flesh, then certainly he who is the Father of our spirits (and they are the principal part of us, and that part of us by which we are denominated God's offspring) is himself a Spirit, and we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man's device, Act 17:29. We wrong God, and put an affront upon him, if we think so. God honoured man in making his soul after his own likeness; but man dishonours God if he makes him after the likeness of his body. The Godhead is spiritual, infinite, immaterial, incomprehensible, and therefore it is a very false and unjust conception which an image gives us of God, be the matter ever so rich, fold or silver; be the shape ever so curious, and be it ever so well graven by art or man's device, its countenance, posture, or dress, ever so significant, it is a teacher of lies.
2.Then he dwells not in temples made with hands, Act 17:24. He is not invited to any temple men can build for him, nor confined to any. A temple brings him never the nearer to us, nor keeps him ever the longer among us. A temple is convenient for us to come together in to worship God; but God needs not any place of rest or residence, nor the magnificence and splendour of any structure, to add to the glory of his appearance. A pious, upright heart, a temple not made with hands, but by the Spirit of God, is that which he dwells in, and delights to dwell in. See Kg1 8:27; Isa 66:1, Isa 66:2.
3.Then he is not worshipped, therapeuetai, he is not served, or ministered unto, with men's hands, as though he needed any thing, Act 17:25. He that made all, and maintains all, cannot be benefited by any of our services, nor needs them. If we receive and derive all from him, he is all-sufficient, and therefore cannot but be self-sufficient, and independent. What need can God have of our services, or what benefit can he have by them, when he has all perfection in himself, and we have nothing that is good but what we have from him? The philosophers, indeed, were sensible of this truth, that God has no need of us or our services; but the vulgar heathen built temples and offered sacrifices to their gods, with an opinion that they needed houses and food. See Job 35:5-8; Psa 50:8, etc.
4.Then it concerns us all to enquire after God (Act 17:27): That they should seek the Lord, that is, fear and worship him in a right manner. Therefore God has kept the children of men in a constant dependence upon him for life and all the comforts of life, that he might keep them under constant obligations to him. We have plain indications of God's presence among us, his presidency over us, the care of his providence concerning us, and his bounty to us, that we might be put upon enquiring, Where is God our Maker, who giveth songs in the night, who teacheth us more than the beasts of the earth, and maketh us wiser than the fowls of heaven? Job 35:10, Job 35:11. Nothing, one would think, should be more powerful with us to convince us that there is a God, and to engage us to seek his honour and glory in our services, and to seek our happiness in his favour and love, than the consideration of our own nature, especially the noble powers and faculties of our own souls. If we reflect upon these, and contemplate these, we may perceive both our relation and obligation to a God above us. Yet so dark is this discovery, in comparison with that by divine revelation, and so unapt are we to receive it, that those who have no other could but haply feel after God and find him.
(1.)It was very uncertain whether they could by this searching find out God; it is but a peradventure: if haply they might.
(2.)If they did find out something of God, yet it was but some confused notions of him; they did but feel after him, as men in the dark, or blind men, who lay hold on a thing that comes in their way, but know not whether it be that which they are in quest of or no. It is a very confused notion which this poet of theirs has of the relation between God and man, and very general, that we are his offspring: as was also that of their philosophers. Pythagoras said, Theion genos esti brotoios - Men have a sort of a divine nature. And Heraclitus (apud Lucian) being asked, What are men? answered, Theoi thnētoi - Mortal gods; and, What are the gods? answered, athanatoi anthrōpoi - Immortal men. And Pindar saith (Nemean, Ode 6), En andrōn hen theōn genos - God and man are near a-kin. It is true that by the knowledge of ourselves we may be led to the knowledge of God, but it is a very confused knowledge. This is but feeling after him. We have therefore reason to be thankful that by the gospel of Christ we have notices given us of God much clearer than we could have by the light of nature; we do not now feel after him, but with open face behold, as in a glass, the glory of God.
IV.He proceeds to call them all to repent of their idolatries, and to turn from them, Act 17:30, Act 17:31.
This is the practical part of Paul's sermon before the university; having declared God to them (Act 17:23), he properly presses upon them repentance towards God, and would also have taught them faith towards our Lord Jesus Christ, if they had had the patience to hear him. Having shown them the absurdity of their worshipping other gods, he persuades them to go on no longer in that foolish way of worship, but to return from it to the living and true God. Observe,
1.The conduct of God towards the Gentile world before the gospel came among them: The times of this ignorance God winked at.
(1.)They were times of great ignorance. Human learning flourished more than ever in the Gentile world just before Christ's time; but in the things of God they were grossly ignorant. Those are ignorant indeed who either know not God or worship him ignorantly; idolatry was owing to ignorance.
(2.)These times of ignorance God winked at. Understand it,
[1.]As an act of divine justice. God despised or neglected these times of ignorance, and did not send them his gospel, as now he does. It was very provoking to him to see his glory thus given to another; and he detested and hated these times. So some take it. Or rather,
[2.]As an act of divine patience and forbearance. He winked at these times; he did not restrain them from these idolatries by sending prophets to them, as he did to Israel; he did not punish them in their idolatries, as he did Israel; but gave them the gifts of his providence, Act 14:16, Act 14:17. These things thou hast done, and I kept silence, Psa 50:21. He did not give them such calls and motives to repentance as he does now. He let them alone. Because they did not improve the light they had, but were willingly ignorant, he did not send them greater lights. Or, he was not quick and severe with them, but was long-suffering towards them, because they did it ignorantly, Ti1 1:13.
2.The charge God gave to the Gentile world by the gospel, which he now sent among them: He now commandeth all men every where to repent - to change their mind and their way, to be ashamed of their folly and to act more wisely, to break off the worship of idols and bind themselves to the worship of the true God. Nay, it is to turn with sorrow and shame from every sin, and with cheerfulness and resolution to every duty.
(1.)This is God's command. It had been a great favour if he had only told us that there was room left for repentance, and we might be admitted to it; but he goes further, he interposes his own authority for our good, and has made that our duty which is our privilege.
(2.)It is his command to all men, every where, - to men, and not to angels, that need it not, - to men, and not to devils, that are excluded the benefit of it, - to all men in all places; all men have made work for repentance, and have cause enough to repent, and all men are invited to repent, and shall have the benefit of it. The apostles are commissioned to preach this every where. The prophets were sent to command the Jews to repent; but the apostles were sent to preach repentance and remission of sins to all nations.
(3.)Now in gospel times it is more earnestly commanded, because more encouraged than it had been formerly. Now the way of remission is more opened than it had been, and the promise more fully confirmed; and therefore now he expects we should all repent. "Now repent; now at length, now in time, repent; for you have too long gone on in sin. Now in time repent, for it will be too late shortly."
3.The great reason to enforce this command, taken from the judgment to come. God commands us to repent, because he hath appointed a day in which he will judge the world in righteousness (Act 17:31), and has now under the gospel made a clearer discovery of a state of retribution in the other world than ever before. Observe,
(1.)The God that made the world will judge it; he that gave the children of men their being and faculties will call them to an account for the use they have made of them, and recompense them accordingly, whether the body served the soul in serving God or the soul was a drudge to the body in making provision for the flesh; and every man shall receive according to the things done in the body, Co2 5:10. The God that now governs the world will judge it, will reward the faithful friends of his government and punish the rebels.
(2.)There is a day appointed for this general review of all that men have done in time, and a final determination of their state for eternity. The day is fixed in the counsel of God, and cannot be altered; but it is his there, and cannot be known. A day of decision, a day of recompence, a day that will put a final period to all the days of time.
(3.)The world will be judged in righteousness; for God is not unrighteous, who taketh vengeance; far be it from him that he should do iniquity. His knowledge of all men's characters and actions is infallibly true, and therefore his sentence upon them incontestably just. And, as there will be no appeal from it, so there will be no exception against it.
(4.)God will judge the world by that man whom he hath ordained, who can be no other than the Lord Jesus, to whom all judgment is committed. By him God made the world, by him he redeemed it, by him he governs it, and by him he will judge it.
(5.)God's raising Christ from the dead is the great proof of his being appointed and ordained the Judge of quick and dead. His doing him that honour evidenced his designing him this honour. His raising him from the dead was the beginning of his exaltation, his judging the world will be the perfection of it; and he that begins will make an end. God hath given assurance unto all men, sufficient ground for their faith to build upon, both that there is a judgment to come and that Christ will be their judge; the matter is not left doubtful, but is of unquestionable certainty. Let all his enemies be assured of it, and tremble before him; let all his friends be assured of it, and triumph in him.
(6.)The consideration of the judgment to come, and of the great hand Christ will have in that judgment, should engage us all to repent of our sins and turn from them to God. This is the only way to make the Judge our friend in that day, which will be a terrible day to all who live and die impenitent; but true penitents will then lift up their heads with joy, knowing that their redemption draws nigh.
Historical interpretation
Seventeen Centuries of Reception
4 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Paul, in the Acts of the Apostles, is recorded to have said to the Areopagites, "I perceive that ye are more than ordinarily religious. For as I passed by, and beheld your devotions, I found an altar with the inscription, To The Unknown God. Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, Him declare I unto you. God, that made the world and all things therein, seeing that He is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands; neither is worshipped with men's hands, as though He needed anything, seeing He giveth to all life, and breath, and all things; and hath made of one blood all nations of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; that they should seek God, if haply they might feel after Him, and find Him; though He be not far from every one of us: for in Him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we also are His offspring." Whence it is evident that the apostle, by availing himself of poetical examples from the Phenomena of Aratus, approves of what had been well spoken by the Greeks; and intimates that, by the unknown God, God the Creator was in a roundabout way worshipped by the Greeks; but that it was necessary by positive knowledge to apprehend and learn Him by the Son.
"Neither is worshipped with men's hands, as though he needed anything" - do you observe how, little by little, he brings in the philosophy? how he ridicules the heathen error? "seeing it is He that giveth to all life, and breath, and all things."
"Neither is worshipped by men's hands." How then was He worshipped by men's hands among the Jews? Not by hands, but by the understanding. "As though He needed anything:" since even those acts of worship He did not in this sort seek, "as having need. Shall I eat," saith He, "the flesh of bulls, or drink the blood of goats?" Neither is this enough - the having need of naught - which he has affirmed: for though this is Divine, yet a further attribute must be added. "Seeing it is He that giveth unto all, life and breath and all things." Two proofs of Godhead: Himself to have need of naught, and to supply all things to all men. Produce here Plato and all that he has philosophized about God, all that Epicurus has: and all is but trifling to this! "Giveth," he says, "life and breath." Lo, he makes Him the Creator of the soul also, not its begetter. See again how he overthrows the doctrine about matter.
I can't say for certain which bits came into Christianity from earlier religions. An enormous amount did. I should find it hard to believe Christianity if that were not so. I couldn't believe that nine hundred and ninety-nine religions were completely false and the remaining one true. In reality, Christianity is primarily the fulfillment of the Jewish religion, but also the fulfillment of what was vaguely hinted in all the religions at their best. What was vaguely seen in them all comes into focus in Christianity—just as God Himself comes into focus by becoming a man.
Continue studying Acts 17:25 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Acts 17:25, a pivotal statement from the Apostle Paul's sermon on Mars Hill, profoundly articulates the true nature of God in stark contrast to the prevailing pagan deities and human-centric worship of his Athenian audience. This verse asserts God's absolute self-sufficiency and independence, declaring that He neither requires nor is served by human hands or provisions. Instead, it reveals Him as the ultimate, benevolent Giver and Sustainer of all existence, freely providing life, breath, and every essential thing to humanity, thereby establishing humanity's utter dependence on Him and challenging any notion of reciprocal service.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is embedded within Paul's renowned address to the Athenian philosophers and intellectuals at the Areopagus, as recorded in Acts 17. Having observed their deep religious devotion, evidenced by numerous idols and even an altar dedicated "TO THE UNKNOWN GOD," Paul seizes this opportunity to introduce them to the one true God whom they unknowingly worship. His sermon begins by acknowledging their religiosity (Acts 17:22) and then systematically dismantles their polytheistic and anthropocentric views of deity. He first identifies God as the Creator of the world and everything in it, who does not dwell in man-made temples (Acts 17:24). Acts 17:25 naturally follows, extending this theological argument by asserting God's independence from human service, setting the stage for Paul's call to repentance and belief in the resurrected Christ (Acts 17:30-31).
Historical & Cultural Context
Athens in the first century CE was a vibrant intellectual and religious center, home to diverse philosophical schools such as the Epicureans (who believed gods were detached and indifferent) and the Stoics (who saw divinity as an impersonal force within the universe). The city was renowned for its numerous temples, altars, and idols, reflecting a polytheistic worldview where gods often had human-like needs, requiring sacrifices, offerings, and elaborate rituals to appease them or gain their favor. Many believed that human worship or temple construction somehow "served" or "benefited" the gods. Paul's declaration in Acts 17:25 directly confronts this cultural understanding, challenging the very foundation of their religious practices and philosophical assumptions about divine necessity and human agency.
Key Themes
Acts 17:25 significantly contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Acts and broader biblical theology. It profoundly asserts God's Self-Sufficiency (Aseity), highlighting His complete independence and self-existence, encapsulated in the phrase "as though he needed any thing." God does not require anything from humanity—including our worship, temples, or sacrifices—to fulfill His own being or purpose. This stands in stark contrast to the pagan deities who were often depicted as dependent on human offerings or confined to man-made structures, a concept echoed in Psalm 50:10-12. Furthermore, the verse emphasizes God as the Ultimate Giver and Sustainer, stating "seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things." He is the supreme source of all existence and provision, actively providing every necessity, from the very essence of life and breath (reminiscent of God breathing life into Adam in Genesis 2:7) to all material blessings. This truth reveals humanity's utter dependence on Him, a theme consistently affirmed throughout Scripture, such as in Colossians 1:17 where it is stated that in Christ "all things hold together." Finally, the verse offers a powerful Critique of Idolatry and Misconceptions of Worship. Paul's opening statement, "Neither is worshipped with men's hands," directly condemns the practice of idolatry and the notion that God can be contained, served, or manipulated by human artifacts or rituals alone. True worship is not about fabricating or providing for God out of His perceived need, but about acknowledging His sovereignty, receiving from His abundance, and responding with gratitude. This concept challenges the very foundation of pagan worship and aligns with the commandment against making graven images.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
Meaning "to wait upon menially," "to adore (God)," or "to relieve (of disease)." In this context, it carries the sense of rendering service or homage as if God needed tending, provision, or assistance. Paul emphatically denies this, stating that God is not dependent on human service in the way a physical being or a pagan deity might be. The implication is that God does not require human "therapy" or "service" to be complete or sustained.
Meaning "to require additionally," or "to want further." This word directly conveys the idea of lacking something or being deficient. Paul uses it to underscore God's absolute self-sufficiency (aseity), emphasizing that God is not in a state of deficiency that human actions or offerings could remedy. He is entirely complete in Himself.
Meaning "to give" in a very wide application, including bestowing, delivering, or granting. This verb highlights God's active role as the benevolent source and provider. It stands in direct contrast to the idea of God needing to receive, establishing Him as the ultimate Giver from whom all life and sustenance flow. This emphasizes His generosity and humanity's complete reliance on His provision.
Verse Breakdown
"Neither is worshipped with men's hands"
This opening clause directly challenges the anthropocentric and idolatrous practices prevalent in Athens. "Worshipped" (therapeúō) here implies serving or rendering homage as if God required something. The phrase "with men's hands" (cheirōn anthrōpōn) refers to human effort, labor, and craftsmanship, particularly in the creation of idols and temples. Paul asserts that the true God is not served or honored in a way that suggests He is dependent on human fabrication or physical service, contrasting Him with idols made by human hands.
"as though he needed any thing"
This clause provides the theological rationale for the preceding statement. The Greek word for "needed" (prosdéomai) signifies a lack or a requirement for something additional. Paul is making a profound statement about God's aseity – His inherent self-existence and complete independence. God is not deficient in any way; He does not have needs that humans can fulfill. This directly refutes the pagan notion of gods requiring sustenance or appeasement from their worshippers.
"seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things;"
This final clause presents the ultimate proof of God's self-sufficiency and His true nature as the supreme Provider. Rather than needing anything from humanity, God is the one who freely gives everything to humanity. "Life" (zōḗ) refers to existence itself, "breath" (pnoḗ) to the vital principle that sustains it, and "all things" (panta) encompasses every other necessity and blessing. This highlights God's active role as the benevolent Creator and Sustainer, making humanity utterly dependent on His gracious provision for every aspect of their being and existence.
Literary Devices
Paul's statement in Acts 17:25 masterfully employs several literary devices to convey its profound theological message. Central to its impact is Antithesis, which creates a sharp contrast between two opposing ideas: God not being worshipped as though He needs anything, versus God giving life, breath, and all things. This stark opposition highlights God's unique nature as the ultimate Giver, not a receiver in need. The phrase "as though he needed any thing" functions as a Rhetorical Question or an implied refutation, challenging the audience's preconceived notions about deity without explicitly asking a question. It subtly mocks the absurdity of imagining the divine Creator as having needs. Furthermore, the enumeration of "life, and breath, and all things" is a form of Merism, where two contrasting or complementary parts (life and breath, representing the essence of existence) are used to signify the whole ("all things"). This emphasizes the comprehensive and holistic nature of God's provision. Finally, the entire verse serves as a powerful Didactic Statement, instructing the Athenian audience and all subsequent readers about the true character of God and the nature of genuine worship, moving them away from idolatry towards a proper understanding of the divine.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Acts 17:25 is a foundational declaration of God's absolute sovereignty and self-sufficiency, a concept known as His aseity. It dismantles anthropocentric views of divinity, asserting that the Creator is not dependent on His creation for His existence, well-being, or glory. Instead, all creation is utterly dependent on Him. This truth reorients worship from a transactional model—where humans give to God out of His perceived need—to a relational one, where humans respond with gratitude and adoration to the God who freely gives all. It underscores that God's glory is intrinsic, not augmented by human effort, and that our service is a response to His abundant grace, not a means to fulfill His deficiencies. This verse thus serves as a powerful theological corrective, redirecting human focus from what we can offer God to what God has already, and continues to, lavishly provide.
Reflection and Application
Acts 17:25 calls us to a radical re-evaluation of our relationship with God and the nature of true worship. If God needs nothing from us, then our worship is not about satisfying His lack, but about expressing our overflowing gratitude for His boundless generosity. This truth liberates us from the burden of trying to earn God's favor or provide for His needs, shifting our focus to receiving His grace and living in humble dependence. It reminds us that our very existence, every breath, and every good thing we possess is a gift from His hand. This understanding should cultivate profound humility, recognizing our utter reliance on the Creator, and inspire a life of worship that flows from a heart transformed by His giving, rather than from a sense of obligation or an attempt to manipulate Him. It challenges us to examine whether our worship truly acknowledges His sovereignty and self-sufficiency, or if it subtly reflects a human-centric view where we imagine God somehow benefits from our actions.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Does this verse mean that God doesn't care about our worship or our good deeds?
No, absolutely not. Acts 17:25 does not diminish the importance of worship or good deeds; rather, it redefines their nature and purpose. Paul is clarifying why we worship and serve God. We do not worship Him because He needs anything from us to be complete or sustained. Instead, we worship Him because He is the self-sufficient, all-sufficient Creator and Sustainer who freely gives us "life, and breath, and all things." Our worship and good deeds are therefore not transactional payments or attempts to fill a divine void, but rather grateful responses to His inherent glory and boundless generosity. True worship, as Jesus taught in John 4:24, is "in spirit and truth," flowing from a heart that recognizes God for who He truly is: the independent, benevolent Giver.
How does this verse relate to the biblical commands for tithing and giving offerings?
This verse provides the theological foundation for understanding biblical giving. When we give our tithes and offerings, it is not because God is lacking or because our contributions somehow make Him richer or more powerful. As Psalm 24:1 declares, "The earth is the LORD'S, and the fulness thereof; the world, and they that dwell therein." God already owns everything. Our giving is an act of worship, a tangible expression of our gratitude, trust, and obedience to the One who has already given us everything, including "life, and breath, and all things." It acknowledges His sovereignty over our resources and demonstrates our dependence on His continued provision, aligning our hearts with His generous nature.
Is Paul saying that God doesn't need temples or churches, and therefore they are irrelevant?
Paul's statement "Neither is worshipped with men's hands" (referring to man-made structures like temples) in Acts 17:25 and Acts 17:24 certainly challenges the pagan notion that God is confined to or dependent upon physical structures. However, it does not render places of worship irrelevant. Instead, it elevates the understanding of God. While God does not need a physical building, He does command His people to gather for worship, fellowship, and instruction (Hebrews 10:25). The church building, therefore, serves as a practical gathering place for the community of believers—the true "temple" of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 3:16). The emphasis shifts from the physical structure as a dwelling for God to the spiritual community as the living embodiment of His presence and mission on earth.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Acts 17:25, with its profound declaration of God's self-sufficiency and His role as the ultimate Giver of "life, and breath, and all things," finds its most glorious and complete fulfillment in Jesus Christ. Jesus is the very embodiment of God's giving nature, not needing anything from humanity yet freely bestowing the greatest gifts. He is the one through whom "all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible... all things were created through him and for him" (Colossians 1:16). Indeed, it is "in him all things hold together" (Colossians 1:17), demonstrating His active and ongoing role in sustaining life and existence, echoing the "life, and breath, and all things" of Acts 17:25. Furthermore, Jesus revealed the ultimate act of God's giving: He "did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many" (Mark 10:45). His sacrifice on the cross was not a payment God needed from us, but a gift God gave to us, demonstrating His love while we were still sinners (Romans 5:8). Through Christ, we receive not only physical life and breath but also eternal life (John 10:10) and the Holy Spirit, enabling us to offer true worship "in spirit and truth" (John 4:23-24), a worship that flows from gratitude for His sovereign grace, not from a perceived need on His part.