Philippians 3:7
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- ἀλλ᾽all᾽ButG235CONJConjunction
- ἅτιναhatinawhatever thingsG3748R-NPNRelative pronoun Nominative Plural Neuter
- ἦνēnwereG1510V-IAI-3SVerb Imperfect Active Indicative 3rd Singular
- μοιmoito meG3165P-1DSPersonal pronoun Dative 1st Singular
- κέρδηkerdēgainG2771N-NPNNoun Nominative Plural Neuter
- ταῦταtautatheseG3778D-APNDemonstrative pronoun Accusative Plural Neuter
- ἥγημαιhēgēmaiI have esteemedG2233V-RNI-1SVerb Perfect Middle Or Passive Deponent Indicative 1st Singular
- διὰdiabecause ofG1223PREPPreposition
- τὸνton[the]G3588T-ASMDefinite article Accusative Singular Masculine
- ΧριστὸνChristonChristG5547N-ASM-TNoun Accusative Singular Masculine Title
- ζημίαν·zēmianlossG2209N-ASFNoun Accusative Singular Feminine
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
See on the biblical-era maps


Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Philippians 3:4–8. He set out his notes in a two-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
The apostle here proposes himself for an example of trusting in Christ only, and not in his privileges as an Israelite.
I.He shows what he had to boast of as a Jew and a Pharisee.
Let none think that the apostle despised these things (as men commonly do) because he had them not himself to glory in. No, if he would have gloried and trusted in the flesh, he had as much cause to do so as any man: If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof to trust in the flesh, I more, Philippians 3:4. He had as much to boast of as any Jew of them all.
1.His birth-right privileges. He was not a proselyte, but a native Israelite: of the stock of Israel. And he was of the tribe of Benjamin, in which tribe the temple stood, and which adhered to Judah when all the other tribes revolted. Benjamin was the father's darling, and this was a favourite tribe. A Hebrew of the Hebrews, an Israelite on both sides, by father and mother, and from one generation to another; none of his ancestors had matched with Gentiles.
2.He could boast of his relations to the church and the covenant, for he was circumcised the eighth day; he had the token of God's covenant in his flesh, and was circumcised the very day which God had appointed.
3.For learning, he was a Pharisee, brought up at the feet of Gamaliel, an eminent doctor of the law: and was a scholar learned in all the learning of the Jews, taught according to the perfect manner of the laws of the fathers, Acts 22:3. He was a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee (Acts 23:6), and after the most strict sect of his religion lived a Pharisee, Acts 26:5.
4.He had a blameless conversation: Toughing the righteousness which is of the law, blameless: as far as the Pharisees' exposition of the law went, and as to the mere letter of the law and outward observance of it, he could acquit himself from the breach of it and could not be accused by any.
5.He had been an active man for his religion. As he made a strict profession of it, under the title and character of a Pharisee, so he persecuted those whom he looked upon as enemies to it. Concerning zeal, persecuting the church.
6.He showed that he was in good earnest, though he had a zeal without knowledge to direct and govern the exercise of it: I was zealous towards God, as you all are this day, and I persecuted this way unto the death, Acts 22:3, Acts 22:4. All this was enough to have made a proud Jew confident, and was stock sufficient to set up with for his justification. But,
II.The apostle tells us here how little account he made of these, in comparison of his interest in Christ and his expectations from him:
But what things were gain to me those have I counted loss for Christ (Philippians 3:7); that is, those things which he had counted gain while he was a Pharisee, and which he had before reckoned up, these he counted loss for Christ. "I should have reckoned myself an unspeakable loser of, to adhere to them, I had lost my interest in Jesus Christ." He counted them loss; not only insufficient to enrich him, but what would certainly impoverish and ruin him, if he trusted to them, in opposition to Christ. Observe, The apostle did not persuade them to do any thing but what he had himself did, to quit any thing but what he had himself quitted, nor venture on any bottom but what he himself had ventured his immortal soul upon. - Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord, Philippians 3:8. Here the apostle explains himself.
1.He tells us what it was that he was ambitious of and reached after: it was the knowledge of Christ Jesus his Lord, a believing experimental acquaintance with Christ as Lord; not a merely notional and speculative, but a practical and efficacious knowledge of him. So knowledge is sometimes put for faith: By his knowledge, or the knowledge of him, shall my righteous servant justify many, Isaiah 53:11. And it is the excellency of knowledge. There is an abundant and transcendent excellency in the doctrine of Christ, or the Christian religion above all the knowledge of nature, and improvements of human wisdom; for it is suited to the case of fallen sinners, and furnishes them with all they need and all they can desire and hope for, with all saving wisdom and saving grace.
2.He shows how he had quitted his privileges as a Jew and a Pharisee: Yea doubtless; his expression rises with a holy triumph and elevation, alla men oun ge kai. There are five particles in the original: But indeed even also do I count all things but loss. He had spoken before of those things, his Jewish privileges: here he speaks of all things, all worldly enjoyments and mere outward privileges whatsoever, things of a like kind or any other kind which could stand in competition with Christ for the throne in his heart, or pretend to merit and desert. There he had said that he did count them but loss; but it might be asked, "Did he continue still in the same mind, did he not repent his renouncing them?" No, now he speaks in the present tense: Yea doubtless, I do count them but loss. But it may be said, "It is easy to say so; but what would he do when he came to the trial?" Why he tells us that he had himself practised according to this estimate of the case: For whom I have suffered the loss of all things. He had quitted all his honours and advantages, as a Jew and a Pharisee, and submitted to all the disgrace and suffering which attended the profession and preaching of the gospel. When he embarked in the bottom of the Christian religion, he ventured all in it, and suffered the loss of all for the privileges of a Christian. Nay, he not only counted them loss, but dung, skubala - offals thrown to dogs; they are not only less valuable than Christ, but in the highest degree contemptible, when they come in competition with him. Note, The New Testament never speaks of saving grace in any terms of diminution, but on the contrary represents it as the fruits of the divine Spirit and the image of God in the soul of man; as a divine nature, and the seed of God: and faith is called precious faith; and meekness is in the sight of God of great price, 1 Peter 3:4; 2 Peter 1:1, etc.
Historical interpretation
Two Centuries of Reception
3 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
But "those things which he had once accounted gain," and which he enumerates in the preceding verse-"trust in the flesh," the sign of "circumcision," his origin as "an Hebrew of the Hebrews," his descent from "the tribe of Benjamin," his dignity in the honours of the Pharisee -he now reckons to be only "loss" to himself; (in other words, ) it was not the God of the Jews, but their stupid obduracy, which he repudiates.
But these very words are favorable to the Law, and how they are so, shall be hence manifest. Let us attend accurately to his very words. He said not, The Law is loss: but "I counted it loss." But when he spake of gain, he said not, I counted them, but "they were gain." But when he spake of loss he said, "I counted": and this rightly; for the former was naturally so, but the latter became so, from my opinion. "What then? Is it not so?" says he. It is loss for Christ.
And how has the law become gain? And it was not counted gain, but was so. For consider how great a thing it was, to bring men, brutalized in their nature, to the shape of men. If the law had not been, grace would not have been given. Wherefore? Because it became a sort of bridge; for when it was impossible to mount on high from a state of great abasement, a ladder was formed. But he who has ascended has no longer need of the ladder; yet he does not despise it, but is even grateful to it. For it has placed him in such a position, as no longer to require it. And yet for this very reason, that he doth not require it, it is just that he should acknowledge his obligation, for he could not fly up. And thus is it with the Law, it hath led us up on high; wherefore it was gain, but for the future we esteem it loss. How? Not because it is loss, but because grace is far greater. For as a poor man, that was in hunger, as long as he has silver, escapes hunger, but when he finds gold, and it is not allowable to keep both, considers it loss to retain the former, and having thrown it away, takes the gold coin; so also here; not because the silver is loss, for it is not; but because it is impossible to take both at once, but it is necessary to leave one. Not the Law then is loss, but for a man to cleave to the Law, and desert Christ. Wherefore it is then loss when it leads us away from Christ. But if it sends us on to Him, it is no longer so. For this cause he saith "loss for Christ"; if for Christ, it is not so naturally.
Wherefore he added; "howbeit what things were gain to me, these have I counted loss for Christ."
Such a course of life, so strictly regulated, and entered upon from earliest childhood, such unblemished extraction, such dangers, plots, labors, forwardness, did Paul renounce, "counting them but loss," which before were "gain," that he might "win Christ." But we do not even contemn money, that we may "win Christ," but prefer to fail of the life to come rather than of the good things of the present life. And yet this is nothing else than loss; for tell me now, let us examine in detail the conditions of riches, and see whether it be not loss accompanied with trouble, and without any gain.
Continue studying Philippians 3:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
Everything Paul once counted as gain, his birth, his religion and his record, he now counts as loss for the sake of Christ.
“But what things were gain to me,”
Everything in verses 5 and 6, the privileges of birth and the achievements of effort alike.
“those I counted loss”
A considered judgment in the language of profit and loss, moving the old assets to the debit side.
“for Christ.”
For his sake and because of him. Christ is the reason for the reckoning and its measure.
Paul Counts His Pedigree as Loss
Philippians 3:4–11
Summary
Paul has just warned the church at Philippi about teachers who wanted Gentile believers circumcised, and here he answers them from his own life. If anyone could trust in birth, religion and a good record, Paul could. He was circumcised on the eighth day, born an Israelite of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of the Hebrews and a Pharisee, so zealous that he persecuted the church, and blameless in the righteousness of the law. He once counted all of that as gain. Since meeting Christ he counts it as loss, even as dung, beside the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus as his Lord. What he wants now is to be found in Christ with the righteousness that comes from God by faith, to know Christ in the power of his resurrection and the fellowship of his sufferings, and to reach the resurrection of the dead.
Why Paul sets out his credentials
These verses answer a warning. In Philippians 3:1–3 Paul tells the church to beware of “dogs”, of “evil workers” and of “the concision”, people who mutilate the flesh. They were most likely Judaizers, Jewish Christians who insisted that Gentile converts be circumcised and keep the law of Moses in order to be saved, or to reach a higher righteousness. The church at Philippi was mostly Gentile, and the same dispute ran through the whole early church, as the council at Jerusalem in Acts 15 and Paul’s letter to the Galatians show. Paul wrote to Philippi from prison, probably in Rome, around AD 60–62.
Paul meets these teachers on their own ground, and he calls what they offered “confidence in the flesh”. The word for confidence, pepoíthēsis, means confidence or trust. The verb translated “trust” later in the verse, peíthō, means to persuade or convince, and in its perfect and passive forms to trust, to rely on or to be convinced, and pepoíthēsis goes with that perfect sense of trusting. Flesh, sárx, in Paul’s letters often means human nature as it is apart from the Spirit of God. Here it takes in everything a person might lean on before God from his own side: ancestry, ritual, effort, religious performance and moral record.
“If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more.” Paul says this to strip such boasting of its value, since he had more of these grounds than any of his opponents and gave them all up. His judgment on confidence in the flesh comes from deep personal experience, and the Judaizers could hardly claim he misunderstood a life he had lived better than they had. There is irony in the care with which he lays out his credentials, only to count them as loss three verses later. The repeated word “flesh” keeps every one of them on the human side.
What Paul gives up is the hope of being accepted by God for what we are by birth or what we have done, and Scripture says the same plainly elsewhere. No one is justified by the works of the law (Romans 3:20). Paul writes to the Galatians, “Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ” (Galatians 2:16), and to the Ephesians, “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast” (Ephesians 2:8–9). God has made Christ our wisdom, righteousness, sanctification and redemption (1 Corinthians 1:30–31), so all our trust and all the glory go to him.
Paul’s pedigree, item by item
Paul’s list runs from what he received at birth to what he gave himself to by choice: first circumcision, race and tribe, then his culture and language, then his party, his zeal and his record. Each item would have impressed the men troubling Philippi. Each also stood for something real in first-century Jewish life, where lineage, the law (above all circumcision) and the careful keeping of tradition marked a righteous man.
Born into the covenant
“Circumcised the eighth day” places Paul inside the covenant from birth. Circumcision, peritomḗ, can mean the rite, the state of being circumcised, or the circumcised people. God commanded Abraham that every male child be circumcised at eight days old (Genesis 17:12), and Paul’s parents kept that command to the day. So he was a born Jew who received the covenant sign exactly as prescribed, set apart from proselytes who received it later in life as converts.
“Of the stock of Israel” names his race. Génos means kin, offspring, nation or stock. Paul descended from Jacob, whom God renamed Israel, and he belonged to God’s chosen people by birthright, of unmixed descent.
“Of the tribe of Benjamin” adds honour to that descent. Benjamin was a distinguished tribe. It gave Israel its first king, Saul, whose name Paul also bore as his Hebrew name, its land lay close to Jerusalem, and the tribe was remembered for its loyalty.
“An Hebrew of the Hebrews” speaks of his culture and language. Paul kept the Hebrew tongue (in practice probably Aramaic, the common Semitic language of the day) and the customs of his fathers, which set him apart from Hellenistic Jews who had taken up the Greek language and Greek ways.
A Pharisee
“As touching the law, a Pharisee” brings the list to Paul’s own devotion. Strong’s explains the name Pharisaîos as “a separatist”, one wholly given to religion. The Pharisees were the most respected and zealous party in Judaism. They studied and applied the written law of Moses and their oral traditions with great care, and they held that strict obedience to the law was the way to righteousness and to the redemption of the nation. Paul was trained under the honoured teacher Gamaliel (Acts 22:3–5), and before the council in Jerusalem he still spoke of himself as a Pharisee (Acts 23:6).
Zeal that persecuted the church
Verse 6 adds two things Paul did. Zeal, zēlos, comes from a word meaning to boil, and it is fervour, ardour, a burning devotion. Paul’s zeal burned for God’s honour and for the traditions of his fathers, and it drove him to persecute the church. The verb diṓkō means to pursue, and by implication to persecute. Paul hunted believers down and tried to destroy their communities in a forceful campaign (Galatians 1:13–14).
People ask how a man so devoted to God could persecute God’s people. Paul believed that the followers of Jesus, with their crucified Messiah and their salvation apart from the law, were blasphemers who threatened the foundations of Judaism, and he thought he was serving God by stamping them out (Acts 26:9–11). His persecution came from religious conviction, sincere and wholly mistaken. Paul later wrote words about his own people that describe his former self exactly: “For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge. For they being ignorant of God’s righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God” (Romans 10:2–4). Zeal has to be joined to knowledge and truth. The grace that met Paul on the road to Damascus (Acts 9:1–19) made the persecutor of the church its most ardent apostle, and he gives thanks for that mercy in 1 Timothy 1:12–16.
What did Paul mean by blameless?
Paul means that, judged by the righteousness the law sets out, his record was spotless and beyond accusation. Ámemptos means irreproachable, faultless, unblamable. By the outward standard of the law and its traditions, and in the eyes of his peers, he had kept every requirement. The righteousness “which is in the law” is the standing a man gains by strict obedience to its commands. Paul names that same righteousness in verse 9 as “mine own righteousness, which is of the law”, and he lays it down. Outward blamelessness leaves sin unatoned for and the heart unchanged. Christ meets the law’s demands by keeping it perfectly himself, and he is “the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth” (Romans 10:2–4).
Gain counted as loss
Verse 7 is the turning point of the passage: “But what things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ.” Every item of verses 5 and 6 belongs to “what things”: his circumcision, his descent, his tribe, his Hebrew heritage, his place among the Pharisees, his zeal and his blamelessness. By the standards of his society and his own former understanding they were real advantages, the things that gave him status, identity and standing before God and men.
Paul describes the change in the language of accounts. Gain, kérdos, is profit or advantage, what a trader makes. Loss, zēmía, is damage or detriment, a loss suffered. The verb “counted”, hēgéomai, means to lead, and figuratively to deem or consider. Paul has weighed his old assets and entered them on the other side of the ledger. The word “for” is diá with Christ as its object in the accusative, and in that construction it means “for the sake of” or “because of”. Christ is the reason for the new reckoning, and he is the standard by which everything else is measured.
Paul came to this reckoning when he met the risen Christ on the road to Damascus (Acts 9:1–19). The cost was real. Giving up the very things that defined him meant losing his standing and facing the hostility of his former peers.
His reckoning follows the mind of Christ that he set before the Philippians in the chapter before: “Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross” (Philippians 2:5–8). Christ laid aside his glory for our salvation, and his loss on the cross became our gain of righteousness, reconciliation and eternal life. Jesus taught that whoever loses his life for his sake will find it (Matthew 16:25).
Was the law a bad thing?
Paul honours the law as God’s own gift: “Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good” (Romans 7:12). His heritage and the law became loss to him when they were trusted for righteousness or used as grounds for boasting, because then they stood in the way of Christ. Set beside the far greater worth of Christ and of the righteousness that comes by faith in him, they count as loss. Jesus came to fulfil the law (Matthew 5:17), and the sign of circumcision finds its fulfilment in the circumcision of the heart (Romans 2:29). Christ is himself the true Israel, God’s servant (Isaiah 49:3), and our identity now rests on being a new creature in him (2 Corinthians 5:17).
The surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord
“Yea doubtless” is emphatic, and verse 8 takes the reckoning of verse 7 further in three ways. Paul’s counting is present and continuing: “I count”. It takes in “all things”, everything earthly, along with the credentials he has listed. And it uses a far stronger word for their worth.
The reason is “the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord”. Excellency renders hyperéchō, to hold oneself above, to excel, and as a participle used like a noun, superiority. The knowledge of Christ stands above everything Paul once valued, beyond comparison. Knowledge, gnōsis, is knowing, the act of knowing, and its object here is a person. Paul calls him “my Lord”, kýrios, his own Master, so this knowledge is personal and belongs to a living relationship with Christ. In Christ “are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge” (Colossians 2:3).
“For whom I have suffered the loss of all things” moves from counting to what actually happened. The verb zēmióō means to suffer damage or to experience loss. Paul lost his reputation, his comfort and security, and the career he might have had in Judaism, and on his journeys he met physical hardship, prison and rejection. In a Roman world that prized honour, status and material gain, his words would have sounded shocking.
Why does Paul call his gains dung?
Paul reaches for the strongest word he can to show how worthless his old gains are beside Christ. Skýbalon, which Strong’s defines as “what is thrown to the dogs”, means refuse, rubbish or dung, something fit only to be thrown away. A loss sits on the debit side of a ledger, and dung is something to get rid of. The blunt word makes the point unforgettable: anything that competes with Christ for first place deserves to be discarded.
What it means to win Christ
“That I may win Christ” gives the purpose of all the counting and losing. The verb kerdaínō means to gain, and it answers the “gain” of verse 7: Paul let his gains go so that he might gain Christ himself. To gain Christ is to gain his righteousness (verse 9), eternal life in him (John 3:16) and close fellowship with him, every blessing of salvation in one person. Jesus told of a man who found treasure hidden in a field and sold all he had to buy it, and of a merchant who sold everything for one pearl of great price (Matthew 13:44–46). Paul speaks of carrying this treasure in earthen vessels (2 Corinthians 4:7).
Two kinds of righteousness
Verse 9 gives the deepest reason for Paul’s new reckoning, and it lies at the heart of the gospel. “And be found in him” states what Paul wants above all. Heurískō means to find, and to be found is to be discovered or recognized as one truly is. Paul wants to be found “in him”, en with autós, his whole standing defined by his union with Christ.
Then he sets two kinds of righteousness side by side. Righteousness, dikaiosýnē, means equity of character or act, and in Paul’s letters justification, a right standing before God and acceptance by him.
The first is “mine own righteousness, which is of the law”. “Mine own” is emós, simply “my, mine”. It is the righteousness Paul could call his because he produced it by keeping the law, nómos, the law of Moses. He had pursued it and excelled in it, as verse 6 says, and now he counts it insufficient.
The second is “that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith”. Faith, pístis, is persuasion, credence and conviction, and especially reliance upon Christ for salvation. “Through” is diá again, here naming the channel, and “by faith” uses epí, upon, naming the basis: this righteousness comes to us through faith and rests upon faith. “Of God” is ek with theós. Ek means from or out of, and the KJV’s “of” here means the same as “from”: God is the source of this righteousness, and it comes to us as his gift. Christós is Christ, the one in whom all of it is found.
What God gives is the righteousness of Christ himself. Christ kept the law perfectly, lived a sinless life, and offered himself as the spotless Lamb of God (John 1:29). In his death he bore the penalty for our unrighteousness, and his resurrection showed his victory over sin and death. He was made sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God (2 Corinthians 5:21). God credits, or imputes, Christ’s righteousness to everyone who trusts him. The law itself reveals our sin (Romans 3:20). Paul sets out the righteousness of God that comes through faith in Jesus Christ in Romans 3:21–28, and he calls it the righteousness of God revealed in the gospel (Romans 1:17). It brings peace with God through Christ (Ephesians 2:13–16). This truth sets believers free from the impossible burden of earning what can only be given, and it anchors our hope in God’s unfailing grace.
Faith in Christ, or the faithfulness of Christ?
Paul’s words “the faith of Christ” name Christ as the one on whom this righteousness depends, and believers differ on exactly how. Some believers hold that the phrase means faith in Christ, the trust we place in him, since Paul’s letters speak so often of believing in Jesus and the same verse ends “by faith”. Others hold that it means Christ’s own faithfulness, his perfect obedience and finished work, on which our faith relies. On either reading the righteousness comes from God, rests on Christ, and is received by faith.
Knowing Christ in his power and his sufferings
Verse 10 turns from what Paul receives to what he longs for. “That I may know him” uses ginṓskō, the common verb meaning to know, to come to know, to perceive or understand. Often it means simply having information, and what gives it its depth here is its object: Paul wants to know Christ himself, in the power of his resurrection, the fellowship of his sufferings and conformity to his death. That is knowledge gained by living in union with him. The one he longs to know is the Son of God made flesh, in whom the Father is perfectly made known (John 14:9). Jesus said, “And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent” (John 17:3).
“The power of his resurrection” is the power that raised Jesus from the dead. Dýnamis means ability, force or might, including miraculous power. That power is at work in believers now, because the Spirit of him who raised Jesus gives life to our mortal bodies (Romans 8:11). It enables us to overcome sin and live a new life: “Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life” (Romans 6:3–5).
“The fellowship of his sufferings” means sharing in them. Koinōnía is partnership, participation, communion and sharing, and páthēma is suffering. Paul means the hardships, persecution and self-denial that come with following Christ and spreading his gospel, which draw a believer closer to him. He writes of sharing in Christ’s sufferings (2 Corinthians 1:5) and of carrying about in the body the dying of Jesus (2 Corinthians 4:10–11), and he lists his own labours, beatings and dangers in 2 Corinthians 11:23–28. For the Philippians, who knew hardship themselves, suffering for Christ was a way into deeper union with him and a part in his mission.
Do believers suffer for sin as Christ did?
The fellowship of his sufferings is our share in the hardship of following Christ in a fallen world. Christ’s own suffering on the cross was unique, a single perfect sacrifice offered once for sin (Hebrews 9:28). He “was wounded for our transgressions” (Isaiah 53:5), the sinless Lamb of God bearing the weight of our sin. Our sufferings add nothing to that atonement. They are the cost of belonging to him, and they deepen our communion with him and refine our faith.
Being made conformable unto his death
“Being made conformable unto his death” describes a continuing process, the shaping of a believer into the likeness of Christ’s death. It means dying daily to self, to worldly desire and to the power of sin, in the same obedience and readiness to give up everything that took Christ to the cross. Paul says of himself that he is crucified with Christ and that Christ lives in him (Galatians 2:20). Sharing Christ’s death in this way is the road by which his resurrection life is seen in us.
Attaining the resurrection of the dead
Verse 11 names where knowing Christ leads: “If by any means I might attain unto the resurrection of the dead.” The phrase “if by any means” is eí pōs, “if” and “somehow”. To attain, katantáō, means to arrive at, to reach a destination. The resurrection is the goal at the end of Paul’s road, and he is moving toward it with purpose. The word for resurrection here, exanástasis, means a rising again from the dead. Paul means the bodily resurrection of believers, Christ’s final triumph over death for all who are in him.
Christ’s own resurrection is the guarantee of ours. Jesus said, “I am the resurrection, and the life” (John 11:25), and the word at the empty tomb was, “He is not here, but is risen” (Luke 24:6–7). Christ is the firstfruits, and those who are his will follow him (1 Corinthians 15:20–23). He has won the victory over death (1 Corinthians 15:54–57), and he will give us glorified bodies like his own (Philippians 3:20–21). Believers are already united with Christ in his death and resurrection through baptism (Romans 6:3–5), and that union looks forward to the raising of the body. In the meantime our minds are set on things above, where Christ is (Colossians 3:1–4).
This hope was contested in Paul’s day. Many Greeks found bodily resurrection absurd, and at Athens some mocked when Paul spoke of it (Acts 17:32). Among the Jews its nature was debated, with the Pharisees and Sadducees on opposite sides (Acts 23:8). Paul makes the resurrection the goal of his whole life, against the scoffers and the half-believers alike.
Was Paul unsure he would be raised?
“If by any means” expresses Paul’s intense desire and earnest striving, the longing of a man ready to go through any hardship to reach the goal. He was confident of his salvation in Christ, and earlier in the letter he could say that for him to die would be gain (Philippians 1:21). The “somehow” looks at the road, which may lead through suffering and even death, and Paul is ready to take it. He goes on at once to say that he presses toward the mark (Philippians 3:12–14), picturing the Christian life as a race with a clear finish, and the full union with Christ that the resurrection brings is the prize he longs for.
The gain that outweighs every loss
These verses show a man who had every advantage that birth and religion could give, and who found all of it worth less than Christ. They show us God, who gives as a gift the righteousness that only he can give, and who gives it in his Son. Whatever we might be tempted to lean on before him today belongs on the same list as Paul’s pedigree: a Christian upbringing, years of church attendance, our service, our moral record or our knowledge of theology. God’s verdict over us rests on Christ, and his righteousness is credited to everyone who trusts him.
The passage also shows what knowing Christ holds. It holds the power that raised him from the dead, a share in his sufferings, the shaping of our lives into the pattern of his death, and at the end the resurrection of the dead. Paul counted every earlier gain as loss because he had found someone worth more than all of it together. The same Lord is offered to us, and in him the loss of all things becomes the way to gain everything.
Philippians 3:4
“Though I might also have confidence in the flesh.”
Paul grants that if human credentials counted before God, he would qualify as well as anyone. He sets himself up as the prime example of a man with every worldly reason to trust in them.
“If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh,”
A challenge to anyone who thinks his own record is enough, the Judaizers above all. The second “flesh” keeps every ground of confidence on the human side.
“I more:”
Two words, and the colon opens the list that follows. Paul surpassed his opponents on their own terms, so his giving it all up carries authority.
Philippians 3:5
“Circumcised the eighth day,”
As Genesis 17:12 commands, so Paul was a born Jew, inside the covenant from his eighth day.
“of the stock of Israel,”
A descendant of Jacob, an Israelite by birthright.
“of the tribe of Benjamin,”
The tribe of King Saul, whose name Paul bore.
“an Hebrew of the Hebrews;”
Hebrew in language and custom, set apart from Greek-speaking Jews.
“as touching the law, a Pharisee;”
In his relation to the law he belonged to its strictest keepers, who held to the written law and the oral traditions alike.
Philippians 3:6
“Concerning zeal, persecuting the church;”
The proof of his zeal was the harm he did to the church. In his former mind this counted as a credential.
“touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.”
By the law’s outward standard and the judgment of his peers, his record was faultless. Verse 9 gives his later verdict on that righteousness.
Philippians 3:7 This verse
“But what things were gain to me,”
Everything in verses 5 and 6, the privileges of birth and the achievements of effort alike.
“those I counted loss”
A considered judgment in the language of profit and loss, moving the old assets to the debit side.
“for Christ.”
For his sake and because of him. Christ is the reason for the reckoning and its measure.
Philippians 3:8
“Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss”
An emphatic yes that widens the reckoning from his credentials to everything, and puts it in the present.
“for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord:”
The surpassing worth of knowing Christ, whom Paul calls his own Lord.
“for whom I have suffered the loss of all things,”
What he counted as loss, he has also actually lost.
“and do count them but dung,”
Refuse, fit only to be thrown away, and his strongest word in the passage.
“that I may win Christ,”
The aim of all the loss: Christ himself, with all that comes with him.
Philippians 3:9
“And be found in him,”
Recognized as one who is in Christ, with his whole standing in that union.
“not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law,”
The righteousness Paul could produce by keeping the law, which he no longer rests on.
“but that which is through the faith of Christ,”
Righteousness that reaches us through faith in Christ, or through Christ’s faithfulness, as believers differ.
“the righteousness which is of God by faith:”
From God as its source, and received upon the ground of faith.
Philippians 3:10
“That I may know him,”
Christ himself is the object of Paul’s longing.
“and the power of his resurrection,”
The power that raised Jesus, at work in believers now through the Spirit.
“and the fellowship of his sufferings,”
A share in the hardship that following him brings.
“being made conformable unto his death;”
Being shaped, day by day, into the likeness of his death.
Philippians 3:11
“If by any means”
Earnest longing, ready for whatever road leads there.
“I might attain unto”
Arriving at a destination at the end of a journey.
“the resurrection of the dead.”
The raising of the body at the last, the goal toward which the whole passage moves.
Last revised