TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Genesis 34:6–17. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Jacob's sons, when they heard of the injury done to Dinah, showed a very great resentment of it, influenced perhaps rather by jealousy for the honour of their family than by a sense of virtue. Many are concerned at the shamefulness of sin that never lay to heart the sinfulness of it. It is here called folly in Israel (Gen 34:7), according to the language of after-times; for Israel was not yet a people, but a family only. Note, 1. Uncleanness is folly; for it sacrifices the favour of God, peace of conscience, and all the soul can pretend to that is sacred and honourable, to a base and brutish lust. 2. This folly is most shameful in Israel, in a family of Israel, where God is known and worshipped, as he was in Jacob's tents, by the name of the God of Israel. Folly in Israel is scandalous indeed. 3. It is a good thing to have sin stamped with a bad name: uncleanness is here proverbially called folly in Israel, Sa2 13:12. Dinah is here called Jacob's daughter, for warning to all the daughters of Israel, that they betray not themselves to this folly.
Hamor came to treat with Jacob himself, but he turns him over to his sons; and here we have a particular account of the treaty, in which, it is a shame to say, the Canaanites were more honest than the Israelites.
I.Hamor and Shechem fairly propose this match, in order to a coalition in trade.
Shechem is deeply in love with Dinah; he will have her upon any terms, Gen 34:11, Gen 34:12. His father not only consents, but solicits for him, and gravely insists upon the advantages that would follow from the union of the families, Gen 34:9, Gen 34:10. He shows no jealousy of Jacob, though he was a stranger, but rather an earnest desire to settle a correspondence with him and his family, making him that generous offer, The land shall be before you, trade you therein.
II.Jacob's sons basely pretend to insist upon a coalition in religion, when really they designed nothing less.
If Jacob had taken the management of this affair into his own hands, it is probable that he and Hamor would soon have concluded it; but Jacob's sons meditate only revenge, and a strange project they have for the compassing of it - the Shechemites must be circumcised; not to make them holy (they never intended that), but to make them sore, that they might become an easier prey to their sword.
1.The pretence was specious. "It is the honour of Jacob's family that they carry about with them the token of God's covenant with them; and it will be a reproach to those that are thus dignified and distinguished to enter into such a strict alliance with those that are uncircumcised (Gen 34:14); and therefore, if you will be circumcised, then we will become one people with you," Gen 34:15, Gen 34:16. Had they been sincere herein their proposal of these terms would have had in it something commendable; for Israelites should not intermarry with Canaanites, professors with profane; it is a great sin, or at least the cause and inlet of a great deal, and has often been of pernicious consequence. The interest we have in any persons, and the hold we have of them, should be wisely improved by us, to bring them to the love and practice of religion (He that winneth souls is wise); but then we must not, like Jacob's sons, think it enough to persuade them to submit to the external rites of religion, but must endeavour to convince them of its reasonableness, and to bring them acquainted with the power of it.
2.The intention was malicious, as appears by the sequel of the story; all they aimed at was to prepare them for the day of slaughter. Note, Bloody designs have often been covered, and carried on, with a pretence of religion; thus they have been accomplished most plausibly and most securely: but this dissembled piety is, doubtless, double iniquity. Religion is never more injured, nor are God's sacraments more profaned, than when they are thus used for a cloak of maliciousness. Nay, if Jacob's sons had not had this bloody design, I do not see how they could justify their offering the sacred sign of circumcision, the seal of God's covenant, to these devoted Canaanites, who had no part nor lot in the matter. Those had no right to the seal that had no right to the promise. It is not meet to take the children's bread, and cast it to dogs: but Jacob's sons valued not this, while they could make it serve their turn.
Continue studying Genesis 34:9 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Genesis 34:9 records Hamor, prince of the Hivites, presenting a formal proposal to Jacob's family for widespread intermarriage between their two peoples. This offer, made in the immediate aftermath of Shechem's defilement of Dinah, aims to forge a deep, lasting social and economic alliance, driven by Hamor's desire for integration and mutual benefit, yet it tragically serves as a deceptive prelude to the violent retribution planned by Jacob's sons.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is a crucial part of the unfolding drama in Genesis 34, immediately following the defilement of Dinah by Shechem, Hamor's son, as recounted in Genesis 34:2. Hamor's proposal in Genesis 34:9 represents the Hivite attempt to resolve the crisis and secure a future alliance. It sets the stage for the deceptive response of Jacob's sons in Genesis 34:13-17, where they feign agreement to the terms, ultimately leading to the massacre of the Shechemites in Genesis 34:25-29. The entire chapter highlights the profound consequences of sin and the complex, often violent, dynamics of intergroup relations in the ancient world.
Historical & Cultural Context
In the ancient Near East, intermarriage was a common and powerful tool for forging political, economic, and social alliances between different tribes or city-states. Hamor's proposal reflects this practice, aiming to integrate the Hivites of Shechem with Jacob's prosperous and growing family. Such unions were not merely personal but involved entire communities, often leading to shared resources, defense pacts, and cultural exchange. The Hivites, a Canaanite people, would have viewed Jacob's family as a significant, albeit nomadic, entity with considerable wealth in livestock and possessions, making an alliance highly desirable for their own advancement and security.
Key Themes
Genesis 34:9 contributes significantly to several key themes within the book of Genesis and the broader biblical narrative. It underscores the theme of covenantal distinctiveness and the challenge of maintaining purity for God's chosen people, even before the formal giving of the Mosaic Law, which would later explicitly forbid intermarriage with pagan nations (e.g., Deuteronomy 7:3). The passage also highlights the devastating consequences of sin, demonstrating how one act of violence (Dinah's defilement) can trigger a chain reaction of further sin, including deceit and mass murder. Furthermore, it touches upon the theme of human schemes versus divine providence, showing how human attempts to resolve conflict or secure advantage through manipulation and violence often lead to tragic outcomes, contrasting with God's sovereign plan for His people.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
From the primitive root H2859, meaning "to give (a daughter) away in marriage; hence (generally) to contract affinity by marriage." This word signifies more than just individual unions; it implies a deep, comprehensive familial integration, aiming for a merging of entire households and communities, creating a lasting bond of affinity.
From the primitive root H5414, a versatile verb meaning "to give" in the widest variety of applications, including to put, make, bestow, or grant. In this context, it refers to the act of formally handing over daughters for marriage, a significant transaction in ancient society that solidified alliances and transferred social status.
From the primitive root H3947, meaning "to take" in a wide variety of applications, including to accept, receive, or acquire. Here, it refers to the reciprocal act of receiving daughters in marriage, completing the proposed exchange and symbolizing the mutual integration of the two groups.
Verse Breakdown
"And make ye marriages with us"
This opening clause is Hamor's primary proposition, directly inviting Jacob's family into a comprehensive marital alliance. The use of the plural "ye" indicates an offer for the entire household, not just Shechem and Dinah. It signifies a desire for deep social and economic integration, aiming to merge the two communities into one.
"and give your daughters unto us"
This specifies the first part of the reciprocal arrangement. Hamor proposes that Jacob's family provide their daughters to the Hivite men as wives. This act would signify the transfer of Jacob's family's women into Hivite households, strengthening the Hivite lineage and potentially their social standing.
"and take our daughters unto you"
This completes the reciprocal proposal, indicating that Jacob's sons and men should, in turn, take Hivite daughters as their wives. This mutual exchange of women would cement the alliance, creating intertwined family trees and fostering a sense of shared community and mutual obligation.
Literary Devices
The verse employs Reciprocity and Repetition to emphasize the comprehensive nature of Hamor's proposal. The phrases "give your daughters unto us, and take our daughters unto you" clearly outline a mutual exchange, highlighting the balanced, albeit self-serving, nature of the proposed alliance. This reciprocal structure underscores Hamor's vision of complete integration. Furthermore, the verse functions as a powerful piece of Dramatic Irony. Hamor's seemingly benevolent and straightforward diplomatic overture, intended to resolve conflict and secure advantage, is met with a cunning and deceptive response from Jacob's sons, who are already plotting violent retribution. The reader is aware of the sons' true intentions, making Hamor's earnest proposal tragically ironic and a prelude to the devastating events that follow.
Theological and Thematic Connections
The proposal in Genesis 34:9, though seemingly a practical solution to a social crisis, exposes deeper theological tensions. It highlights the recurring biblical theme of the purity and distinctiveness of God's people. While the explicit Mosaic Law forbidding intermarriage with pagan nations was yet to be given, the patriarchal narratives already demonstrate an underlying concern for maintaining a separate identity for Abraham's descendants, who carried the promise of the covenant. Hamor's offer, therefore, represents a potential compromise of this nascent covenantal identity, challenging Jacob's family to consider their unique calling. This narrative also powerfully illustrates the pervasive consequences of sin, showing how one act of defilement (Dinah's rape) can spiral into a complex web of deceit, violence, and moral compromise, demonstrating humanity's brokenness and desperate need for divine intervention.
Reflection and Application
Genesis 34:9, set within its ancient context, provides profound insights into the complexities of human relationships, negotiations, and the far-reaching consequences of both sin and compromise. For believers today, it serves as a cautionary tale, urging profound discernment when forming deep relationships, especially marriage. The narrative implicitly warns against the dangers of being unequally yoked with those who do not share a foundational commitment to God's truth and ways. Such unions, though seemingly advantageous or expedient, can lead to spiritual compromise, moral dilemmas, and unforeseen complications that undermine one's walk with God. Furthermore, the passage underscores the perilous ripple effects of sin, demonstrating how a single transgression can initiate a tragic chain of events, highlighting the critical importance of integrity, righteousness, and reliance on divine wisdom over human schemes in all our dealings.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did Hamor propose intermarriage with Jacob's family?
Hamor's proposal was primarily strategic and opportunistic. He sought to integrate his people with Jacob's prosperous family for significant economic and social gain, as he explicitly states in Genesis 34:10. He viewed Jacob's household as wealthy in flocks and goods, believing that widespread intermarriage would create a lasting, mutually beneficial alliance, allowing the Hivites to share in Jacob's prosperity and consolidate their position in the land.
Was intermarriage always forbidden for God's people in the Bible?
While explicit, comprehensive prohibitions against intermarriage with specific pagan nations were later codified in the Mosaic Law (e.g., Deuteronomy 7:3), the underlying principle of maintaining spiritual distinctiveness and covenantal purity was present from early on. The narrative in Genesis 34 highlights the inherent tension and potential for spiritual compromise when God's people intermarry with those outside the covenant, even before formal laws were given. The concern was not merely ethnic, but primarily theological—to prevent the adoption of idolatrous practices and to preserve the unique identity of the people through whom God's promises would be fulfilled.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The tragic events surrounding Genesis 34:9, marked by human sin, deceit, and violence, powerfully underscore humanity's desperate need for a true and righteous mediator and a perfect covenant. Hamor's failed attempt at human-orchestrated unity through intermarriage and the sons' subsequent sinful retribution reveal the brokenness of a world apart from God's perfect plan and the futility of human efforts to achieve lasting peace or true reconciliation on their own terms. Christ, however, fulfills the longing for genuine unity and reconciliation, not through strategic alliances or violent conquest, but through His atoning sacrifice on the cross. He is the ultimate "marriage" maker, uniting disparate peoples—Jew and Gentile—into one new humanity, His Church, by breaking down the dividing wall of hostility (Ephesians 2:14). Unlike the compromised unions proposed by Hamor, Christ establishes a pure and holy bride, the Church (Ephesians 5:25-27), called to be distinct and set apart for Him, free from the defilement of the world, united in a covenant of grace that transcends all human schemes and failures. Through Him, we are truly "one" (John 17:20-23), not by human arrangement, but by divine redemption.