See on the biblical-era map



Study This Verse
Commentary on Genesis 26 verses 34–35
Here is, 1. Esau's foolish marriage - foolish, some think, in marrying two wives together, for which perhaps he is called a fornicator (Heb 12:16), or rather in marrying Canaanites, who were strangers to the blessing to Abraham, and subject to the curse of Noah, for which he is called profane; for hereby he intimated that he neither desired the blessing nor dreaded the curse of God. 2. The grief and trouble it created to his tender parents. (1.) It grieved them that he married without asking, or at least without taking, their advice and consent: see whose steps those children tread in who either contemn or contradict their parents in disposing of themselves. (2.) It grieved them that he married the daughters of Hittites, who had no religion among them; for Isaac remembered his father's care concerning him, that he should by no means marry a Canaanite. (3.) It should seem, the wives he married were provoking in their conduct towards Isaac and Rebekah; those children have little reason to expect the blessing of God who do that which is a grief of mind to their good parents.
See how much can be learned from these few words. I mean, why did it indicate to us Esau’s age? Not idly, but for us to learn from it Isaac’s advanced years and the fact that he was now well beyond his prime. You see, if we recall what was said before, that at the time he married Rebekah he was in fact forty years old, whereas when the children were born he was sixty, we will realize that now at a hundred he had reached the height of old age. Since, in fact, it is next about to recount to us that because of his age he had poor eyesight, accordingly it indicates his age to us so that we might be in a position to know precisely Isaac’s time of life. So it said, “Now, Esau was forty.”Then for us to learn the boy’s indiscretion in taking brides from races he should not have, it revealed to us that one was from the race of the Hittites, the other from the Hivites. Yet knowing as Esau did the pains taken by the patriarch in giving express orders to his servant to select a bride for Isaac from his own tribe and the fact that their mother Rebekah came from Haran, he should not have set his mind on any such thing. In order, however, to show from the outset the undisciplined character of Esau’s behavior, he took those wives before seeking advice. And for us to learn their intractable nature Scripture says, “They were at odds with Isaac and Rebekah.” What could be more galling than this antipathy when they were due to show complete respect and not only did not do this but were even prepared for hostility?
Continue studying Genesis 26:35 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Genesis 26:35 succinctly captures the profound and persistent emotional distress experienced by Isaac and Rebekah, Esau's parents, as a direct consequence of his marital choices. By taking two Hittite women as wives, Esau disregarded the foundational covenant principles of their lineage, which aimed to preserve spiritual purity and distinctiveness, thereby causing his parents deep and continuous sorrow.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The verse employs several significant literary devices. The phrase "grief of mind" itself functions as a Euphemism or Understatement, subtly conveying a much deeper and more pervasive spiritual anguish than a mere annoyance. The Hebrew môrâh rûwach (bitterness of spirit) suggests a constant, nagging irritation and profound sorrow that permeates their inner being, far beyond simple parental disappointment. This emotional state also serves as Foreshadowing, hinting at the future conflicts and divisions within the family, particularly the rivalry between Jacob and Esau, and the eventual separation of their lineages. It also foreshadows the later Mosaic Law's strong prohibitions against intermarriage with pagan nations, underscoring the spiritual danger of such unions for the covenant people. Furthermore, there is a subtle Irony in the name "Isaac" (meaning "laughter"), as the one whose birth brought joy and laughter now experiences profound grief due to his son's choices, contrasting the promise with the present reality.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
The "grief of mind" experienced by Isaac and Rebekah over Esau's marriages powerfully illustrates the profound spiritual and emotional consequences of choices that deviate from God's covenant principles. It underscores the deep parental anguish that can arise when children make decisions that threaten the spiritual integrity of the family and compromise the foundational values of their faith. This sorrow highlights the importance of spiritual compatibility in marriage, not merely as a cultural preference but as a vital component for preserving a godly heritage and ensuring the continuation of God's purposes through a distinct people. Ultimately, this verse serves as a sober reminder that personal choices, especially in foundational areas like marriage, have far-reaching implications, impacting not only individuals but also their families and the broader community of faith.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
This ancient verse offers several timeless lessons for modern readers. It underscores the profound impact that marital choices have, not only on the individuals involved but also on their immediate families and spiritual legacy. It validates the deep concern and sometimes sorrow parents feel for their children's life choices, especially those that touch upon core values and spiritual commitments. For believers today, it serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of living a life distinct from worldly values, particularly in foundational relationships like marriage, to honor God and maintain spiritual integrity. Discerning partners who share and uphold one's spiritual convictions is crucial for a harmonious home and a strong spiritual foundation for future generations. It calls us to consider how our choices reflect our commitment to God's covenant and how they impact those we love most.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was Esau's marriage to Hittite women such a problem for Isaac and Rebekah?
Answer: Esau's marriages were problematic because they violated a long-standing family and covenant principle established by Abraham. Abraham had explicitly ensured Isaac married from his own kindred (as seen in Genesis 24:3-4) to preserve the spiritual purity and distinctiveness of their lineage, which was crucial for God's covenant promises. The Hittite women were from a pagan culture, and their foreign customs and idolatrous practices posed a direct threat to the spiritual integrity of Isaac and Rebekah's family, causing them deep and ongoing distress. Their presence represented a spiritual compromise that jeopardized the unique identity of the covenant people.
What does "grief of mind" truly mean in the Hebrew?
Answer: The KJV phrase "grief of mind" translates the Hebrew môrâh rûwach (מֹרַת רוּחַ), which literally means "bitterness of spirit" or "vexation of spirit." It signifies a profound, internal, and persistent sorrow or anguish, rather than a fleeting annoyance. The word môrâh (grief) comes from a root meaning "to be bitter," and rûwach (mind) refers to the inner spirit or disposition. Thus, it suggests that Esau's wives were a continuous source of spiritual distress and irritation that deeply affected Isaac and Rebekah's inner peace and well-being, a constant "bitterness" in their "spirit."
Does this verse suggest that God cares about whom we marry today?
Answer: Yes, this verse, along with many other passages in Scripture, strongly implies that God cares deeply about whom His people marry. While the specific cultural context of "kindred" has changed, the underlying principle of spiritual compatibility and distinctiveness remains. The New Testament similarly warns against being "unequally yoked with unbelievers" (as seen in 2 Corinthians 6:14), emphasizing that marriage should ideally be between those who share a common faith and commitment to Christ. This is to foster spiritual unity, prevent compromise, and ensure that the family unit can effectively honor God and raise future generations in His ways, avoiding the "grief of mind" that comes from spiritual misalignment.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The "grief of mind" experienced by Isaac and Rebekah over Esau's choices highlights the persistent struggle in the Old Covenant to maintain spiritual purity and distinctiveness through human effort and adherence to lineage. This sorrow foreshadows the deeper grief caused by humanity's ongoing rebellion against God, which necessitated a perfect solution. In Christ, the ultimate heir of the Abrahamic covenant (as prophesied in Galatians 3:16), the true spiritual family is formed, not by ethnic lineage or human choice alone, but by faith in Him. He establishes a new covenant where spiritual kinship transcends earthly boundaries, uniting believers from every nation into one body, the Church (as seen in Ephesians 2:19-22). Through His atoning work on the cross, Christ addresses the root cause of all "grief of mind"—sin—offering true peace and the promise of a perfectly distinct and pure people, united in Him, free from the burdens of spiritual compromise and the consequences of unwise choices (as described in Colossians 1:21-22). He is the true spiritual "kinsman-redeemer" who brings an end to the "bitterness of spirit" caused by sin and separation from God.