Hebrews 10:4
For [it is] not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.
For {G1063} it is not possible {G102} that the blood {G129} of bulls {G5022} and {G2532} of goats {G5131} should take away {G851} sins {G266}.
For it is impossible that the blood of bulls and goats should take away sins.
because it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.
For it is impossible that the blood of bulls and goats should take away sins.
Cross-References
-
Hebrews 10:11
And every priest standeth daily ministering and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins: -
Isaiah 1:11
To what purpose [is] the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the LORD: I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats. -
Isaiah 1:15
And when ye spread forth your hands, I will hide mine eyes from you: yea, when ye make many prayers, I will not hear: your hands are full of blood. -
Micah 6:6
¶ Wherewith shall I come before the LORD, [and] bow myself before the high God? shall I come before him with burnt offerings, with calves of a year old? -
Micah 6:8
He hath shewed thee, O man, what [is] good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? -
Romans 11:27
For this [is] my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins. -
1 John 3:5
And ye know that he was manifested to take away our sins; and in him is no sin.
Commentary
Hebrews 10:4 is a pivotal verse in the Book of Hebrews, succinctly stating a fundamental theological truth about the inadequacy of Old Covenant sacrifices. It serves as a bridge, explaining why a new and superior sacrifice was necessary.
Context
This verse comes within a larger argument in Hebrews, which systematically demonstrates the supremacy of Jesus Christ's priesthood and His sacrifice over the Levitical system established under the Old Covenant. Chapters 9 and 10 directly address the tabernacle, its rituals, and the repeated animal sacrifices prescribed by the Mosaic Law. The author's aim is to show that while these sacrifices were divinely ordained, they were inherently limited and could not truly perfect the worshipper or permanently remove sin. They were a foreshadowing, a temporary provision that continuously reminded the people of their sinfulness, rather than providing a definitive solution.
Key Themes and Messages
Linguistic Insights
The phrase "take away sins" uses the Greek verb aphaireō (ἀφαιρέω), which conveys the sense of completely removing, taking off, or abolishing something. This is a stronger concept than merely covering or atoning for sins in a temporary sense. The author emphasizes that animal sacrifices, no matter how meticulously performed, lacked the inherent power to achieve this definitive and permanent removal of sin from the conscience and before God. They could not provide true spiritual purification necessary for eternal salvation.
Practical Application and Significance
For believers today, Hebrews 10:4 profoundly highlights the completeness and sufficiency of Christ's sacrifice on the cross. We are no longer dependent on repeated rituals, animal offerings, or human works for the forgiveness of sins. This verse assures us that:
This verse, therefore, underscores the immense grace and superior provision found in the New Covenant established through Christ's blood, offering a definitive and eternal solution to the problem of sin.
Please note that only the commentary section is AI-generated — the main Scripture and cross-references are stored on the site and are from trusted and verified sources.