TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Genesis 34:25–31. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Here, we have Simeon and Levi, two of Jacob's sons, young men not much above twenty years old, cutting the throats of the Shechemites, and thereby breaking the heart of their good father.
I.Here is the barbarous murder of the Shechemites.
Jacob himself was used to the sheep-hook, but his sons had got swords by their sides, as if they had been the seed of Esau, who was to live by his sword; we have them here,
1.Slaying the inhabitants of Shechem - all the males, Hamor and Shechem particularly, with whom they had been treating in a friendly manner but the other day, yet with a design upon their lives. Some think that all Jacob's sons, when they wheedled the Shechemites to be circumcised, designed to take advantage of their soreness, and to rescue Dinah from among them; but that Simeon and Levi, not content with that, would themselves avenge the injury - and they did it with a witness. Now,
(1.)It cannot be denied but that God was righteous in it. Had the Shechemites been circumcised in obedience to any command of God, their circumcision would have been their protection; but when they submitted to that sacred rite only to serve a turn, to please their prince and to enrich themselves, it was just with God to bring this upon them. Note, As nothing secures us better than true religion, so nothing exposes us more than religion only pretended to.
(2.)But Simeon and Levi were most unrighteous.
[1.]It was true that Shechem had wrought folly against Israel, in defiling Dinah; but it ought to have been considered how far Dinah herself had been accessory to it. Had Shechem abused her in her own mother's tent, it would have been another matter; but she went upon his ground, and perhaps by her indecent carriage had struck the spark which began the fire: when we are severe upon the sinner we ought to consider who was the tempter.
[2.]It was true that Shechem had done ill; but he was endeavouring to atone for it, and was as honest and honourable, ex post facto - after the deed, as the case would admit: it was not the case of the Levite's concubine that was abused to death; nor does he justify what he has done, but courts a reconciliation upon any terms.
[3.]It was true that Shechem had done ill; but what was that to all the Shechemites? Does one man sin, and will they be wroth with all the town? Must the innocent fall with the guilty? This was barbarous indeed.
[4.]But that which above all aggravated the cruelty was the most perfidious treachery that was in it. The Shechemites had submitted to their conditions, and had done that upon which they had promised to become one people with them (Gen 34:16); yet they act as sworn enemies to those to whom they had lately become sworn friends, making as light of their covenant as they did of the laws of humanity. And are these the sons of Israel? Cursed be their anger, for it was fierce.
[5.]This also added to the crime, that they made a holy ordinance of God subservient to their wicked design, so making that odious; as if it were not enough for them to shame themselves and their family, they bring a reproach upon that honourable badge of their religion; justly would it be called a bloody ordinance.
2.Seizing the prey of Shechem, and plundering the town. They rescued Dinah (Gen 34:26), and, if that was all they came for, they might have done that without blood, as appears by their own showing (Gen 34:17); but they aimed at the spoil; and, though Simeon and Levi only were the murderers, yet it is intimated that others of the sons of Jacob came upon the slain and spoiled the city (Gen 34:27), and so became accessory to the murder. In them it was manifest injustice; yet here we may observe the righteousness of God. The Shechemites were willing to gratify the sons of Jacob by submitting to the penance of circumcision, upon this principle, Shall not their cattle and their substance be ours? (Gen 34:23), and see what was the issue; instead of making themselves masters of the wealth of Jacob's family, Jacob's family become masters of their wealth. Note, Those who unjustly grasp at that which is another's justly lose that which is their own.
II.Here is Jacob's resentment of this bloody deed of Simeon and Levi, Gen 34:30.
Two things he bitterly complains of: - 1. The reproach they had brought upon him thereby: You have troubled me, put me into a disorder, for you have made me to stink among the inhabitants of the land, that is, "You have rendered me and my family odious among them. What will they say of us and our religion? We shall be looked upon as the most perfidious barbarous people in the world." Note, The gross misconduct of wicked children is the grief and shame of their godly parents. Children should be the joy of their parents; but wicked children are their trouble, sadden their hearts, break their spirits, and make them go mourning from day to day. Children should be an ornament to their parents; but wicked children are their reproach, and are as dead flies in the pot of ointment: but let such children know that, if they repent not, the grief they have caused to their parents, and the damage religion has sustained in its reputation through them, will come into the account and be reckoned for. 2. The ruin they had exposed him to. What could be expected, but that the Canaanites, who were numerous and formidable, would confederate against him, and he and his little family would become an easy prey to them? I shall be destroyed, I and my house. If all the Shechemites must be destroyed for the offence of one, why not all the Israelites for the offence of two? Jacob knew indeed that God had promised to preserve and perpetuate his house; but he might justly fear that these vile practices of his children would amount to a forfeiture, and cut off the entail. Note, When sin is in the house, there is reason to fear ruin at the door. The tender parents foresee those bad consequences of sin which the wicked children have no dread of. One would think this should have made them to relent, and they should have humbled themselves to their good father, and begged his pardon; but, instead of this, they justify themselves, and give him this insolent reply, Should he deal with our sister as with a harlot? No, he should not; but, if he do, must they be their own avengers? Will nothing less than so many lives, and the ruin of a whole city, serve to atone for an abuse done to one foolish girl? By their question they tacitly reflect upon their father, as if he would have been content to let them deal with his daughter as with a harlot. Note, It is common for those who run into one extreme to reproach and censure those who keep the mean as if they ran into the other. Those who condemn the rigour of revenge shall be misrepresented, as if they countenanced and justified the offence.
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
One surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.
Those who are brothers according to faith to the injured one, if they are in the priestly order, like Levi, are among the subjects (Simon, in fact, is interpreted as “obedience”). They are extremely displeased if somebody who is their intimate friend according to faith is offended. However, they should not proceed to demand blood, nor should they expect extremely severe punishments for the corruptors, so as not to listen to Christ, who said to them, “You have made me hateful, so that I am now evil in the eyes of all the inhabitants of the land.” It is necessary to remember what Jesus said in reproof to Peter, who was holding his sword, “Put up again your sword into its sheath: all those who take the sword shall perish with the sword.” In fact, it is not fitting for us, who are inclined toward piety in God, to be armed with swords but rather to be patient. Even though some people want to persecute us, we must reproach them to be good. We must be patient but never silent, as we must refer to him who judges rightly. Those who want to avoid destruction must be careful not to leave the tabernacle of the father, that is, the house of God, in order not to be received into the herds of the heretics and other strangers. After moving out of the father’s tabernacle, Dinah was brought to the house of Shechem. She would have never been reproached if she had stayed in the paternal houses and had lived constantly in the holy tabernacles. David declares how that thing is beautiful and very useful by singing, “One thing I have asked of the Lord, this I will earnestly seek: that I should dwell in the house of the Lord all the days of my life, that I should behold the fair beauty of the Lord and survey his temple. For in the days of my affliction he hid me in his tabernacle: he sheltered me in the secret of his tabernacle.”
Continue studying Genesis 34:30 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Genesis 34:30 captures Jacob's profound distress and pragmatic fear following the brutal and deceitful massacre of the men of Shechem by his sons, Simeon and Levi. He laments that their violent actions have rendered his family utterly abhorrent and vulnerable among the indigenous inhabitants of the land, specifically the powerful Canaanites and Perizzites. Jacob, acutely aware of his household's small number, foresees a coordinated retaliatory attack that could lead to the complete annihilation of his family and lineage, jeopardizing the very covenant promises of God.
Context
Literary Context
This verse immediately follows the shocking and morally ambiguous events of Genesis 34. Dinah, Jacob's daughter, was raped by Shechem, the son of Hamor, the Hivite prince. While Hamor and Shechem sought to make amends through marriage and integration, Simeon and Levi, Dinah's full brothers, devised a treacherous plan. They demanded that all the males of Shechem be circumcised as a condition for intermarriage. On the third day, while the men of Shechem were in pain, Simeon and Levi entered the city, slaughtered every male, plundered the city, and took their sister Dinah and other women and children captive. Jacob's reaction in Genesis 34:30 is his first direct response to his sons' extreme violence, highlighting his immediate concern for the practical consequences rather than an overt moral condemnation, which comes later in Genesis 49.
Historical & Cultural Context
Jacob's family, though growing, was still a relatively small, nomadic clan dwelling as sojourners in the land of Canaan. This land was already inhabited by various established peoples, including the Canaanites and Perizzites, who were distinct ethnic and political entities. Maintaining peaceful relations with these larger, more powerful indigenous groups was crucial for the survival and security of Jacob's household. The act of slaughtering an entire city, even in response to a grave offense, was an extreme violation of inter-clan and inter-tribal norms, inviting severe retaliation. Such an act would have been seen as an act of war, making Jacob's family a legitimate target for vengeance from surrounding communities who would perceive them as a dangerous and unpredictable threat. The fear of being "few in number" was a very real concern for a vulnerable group in a region where alliances and numerical strength dictated survival.
Key Themes
Genesis 34:30 contributes significantly to several key themes within the broader narrative of Genesis. It underscores the consequences of human sin and unchecked vengeance, demonstrating how even a justified desire for retribution can lead to disproportionate and dangerous outcomes that imperil the innocent. It highlights the precariousness of the patriarch's position as he strives to protect his family and ensure the continuity of the covenant line in a hostile environment, a theme seen also in Abraham's interactions with the Canaanites in Genesis 13:7. Furthermore, the verse subtly introduces the theme of divine protection amidst human folly, as subsequent events in Genesis 35:5 reveal God's intervention to prevent the very disaster Jacob feared, emphasizing that the ultimate security of the covenant people rests not in their own strength or cunning, but in God's sovereign hand.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
Jacob states, "Ye have troubled me." The Hebrew word ʻâkar signifies a deep disturbance, a roiling or stirring up, often implying a state of distress, affliction, or bringing trouble upon someone. It suggests that Simeon and Levi's actions have not merely inconvenienced Jacob but have profoundly unsettled his peace and jeopardized his entire existence, creating a turbulent and dangerous situation for his household.
Jacob laments, "to make me to stink among the inhabitants of the land." The Hebrew verb bâʼash literally means "to smell bad" or "to become foul." Figuratively, as used here, it powerfully conveys the idea of becoming utterly abhorrent, detestable, or odious in the eyes of others. It implies a profound moral and social disgrace that would incite intense revulsion and hostility, making Jacob's family a legitimate target for violent retribution.
Jacob describes himself as "few in number." The word math (H4962) refers to an adult or man, often used in the plural to denote a small group of people. It is reinforced by miçpâr (H4557), which means "number" or "count," often implying a limited or small quantity. Together, these terms emphasize Jacob's acute awareness of his family's numerical inferiority compared to the surrounding populations, highlighting their extreme vulnerability to attack.
Verse Breakdown
"And Jacob said to Simeon and Levi"
This direct address singles out the two sons primarily responsible for the massacre, indicating Jacob's clear understanding of their culpability and his immediate confrontation with them. It highlights the gravity of their actions and Jacob's personal distress.
"Ye have troubled me to make me to stink among the inhabitants of the land, among the Canaanites and the Perizzites"
Jacob expresses his profound dismay, stating that his sons' actions have made his family utterly detestable and repugnant to the surrounding peoples. The naming of the "Canaanites and the Perizzites" underscores his awareness of the specific, powerful, and potentially hostile groups with whom they now have a grievously broken relationship, posing an immediate threat to their safety and reputation.
"and I [being] few in number, they shall gather themselves together against me, and slay me; and I shall be destroyed, I and my house"
This clause reveals the core of Jacob's fear: his family's numerical inferiority makes them an easy target for a united retaliatory attack. He foresees complete annihilation, not just of himself, but of his entire household, which represents the continuity of his lineage and the covenant promises God had made to him. This is a desperate cry born of a realistic assessment of their perilous situation.
Literary Devices
The passage employs several literary devices to convey Jacob's profound distress. Hyperbole is evident in Jacob's declaration that his family will "stink" among the inhabitants, an exaggerated expression of their utter detestability and the extreme social and moral revulsion they have incurred. This vivid imagery emphasizes the severity of their tarnished reputation. Additionally, there is strong Foreshadowing in Jacob's fear of annihilation. While God providentially prevents this immediate disaster (as seen in Genesis 35:5), Jacob's words also foreshadow the later dispersion and diminished tribal inheritances of Simeon and Levi, which Jacob prophesies in Genesis 49:5-7, linking their future fate to their violent actions in Shechem.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Genesis 34:30 powerfully illustrates the far-reaching and often destructive consequences of human sin, particularly when driven by uncontrolled anger and vengeance. While the initial offense against Dinah was heinous, Simeon and Levi's disproportionate and deceitful retribution created an even greater existential threat to Jacob's entire family, demonstrating that human attempts at justice, when unguided by divine wisdom, can lead to deeper peril and dishonor. Jacob's fear underscores the immense responsibility of a patriarch to protect his family and ensure the continuity of the covenant line, a burden he keenly feels in this moment of extreme vulnerability. Yet, the broader narrative reminds us that even amidst human folly and fear, God's providential care for His covenant people remains steadfast.
Reflection and Application
Genesis 34:30 serves as a stark reminder of the profound and often unintended consequences of our actions, especially those born of unchecked emotion like anger or a desire for vengeance. Jacob's lament highlights that our decisions can have devastating ripple effects, not only on ourselves but also on our families, communities, and the witness we bear. It challenges us to consider the long-term implications of our responses to injustice, urging prudence, wisdom, and a reliance on God's righteous judgment rather than our own impulsive retribution. For believers, this passage underscores the importance of seeking justice through means that honor God, recognizing that unbridled retaliation can bring greater dishonor to His name and imperil those we are called to protect. Ultimately, it encourages us to cultivate a spirit of forgiveness and to trust in God's sovereign protection, even when circumstances seem dire, remembering that true security and vindication are found in His faithfulness, not in human strength or cunning.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was Jacob more concerned about his family's safety than the moral implications of his sons' actions?
Jacob's immediate reaction in Genesis 34:30 primarily reflects a pragmatic and existential concern for the survival of his entire household. As a sojourner "few in number" in a hostile land, the massacre of Shechem's males by Simeon and Levi posed an imminent threat of annihilation, making his family "stink" (odious) to the powerful surrounding tribes. While Jacob undoubtedly understood the moral implications of their deceit and violence, his most pressing fear was the immediate danger to the covenant line. His deeper moral condemnation of their actions is more explicitly expressed later in his life, during his patriarchal blessings in Genesis 49:5-7, where he denounces their cruel anger and prophesies their dispersion.
What does the phrase "make me to stink" signify in this context?
The KJV phrase "make me to stink" is a direct and vivid translation of the Hebrew verb bâʼash (בָּאַשׁ), which literally means "to become foul," "to be abhorrent," or "to emit a bad odor." In Genesis 34:30, it powerfully conveys the idea of becoming utterly detestable, repugnant, and morally disgraced in the eyes of others. It implies not just a bad reputation, but a profound social and moral revulsion that would incite anger, hostility, and a desire for violent retribution from the surrounding Canaanites and Perizzites, making Jacob's family a legitimate target for their wrath and a source of deep dishonor.
How does this event relate to Jacob's later prophecies concerning Simeon and Levi?
The violent actions of Simeon and Levi in Genesis 34 and Jacob's immediate fear in Genesis 34:30 directly foreshadow Jacob's prophetic words in Genesis 49:5-7. In his deathbed blessings, Jacob condemns Simeon and Levi's "instruments of cruelty," stating, "Cursed be their anger, for it was fierce; and their wrath, for it was cruel." He prophesies their dispersion: "I will divide them in Jacob, and scatter them in Israel." This demonstrates that Jacob's initial fear was not just pragmatic but also rooted in a deep moral disapproval that had lasting spiritual and territorial consequences for the future tribal inheritances of Simeon and Levi, highlighting God's ultimate justice.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
While Genesis 34:30 vividly portrays the destructive consequences of human sin, vengeance, and the precariousness of life without divine intervention, it implicitly points to humanity's desperate need for a true deliverer and a perfect mediator. Jacob's profound fear of annihilation underscores the vulnerability of humanity under the curse of sin, where even attempts at justice can lead to greater chaos and the threat of complete destruction. Unlike Jacob's sons, whose actions brought the threat of destruction upon their own house, Christ, the ultimate Son of God, perfectly fulfills the role of a righteous avenger, not by human violence or deceit, but by bearing the full wrath of God against sin on the cross. He became "stink" (odious) in the eyes of God, taking on the full weight of our sin, so that we might become the righteousness of God in Him (2 Corinthians 5:21). Through His perfect sacrifice, He secured true peace and reconciliation, establishing a new covenant people who are truly safe and reconciled, not by their own strength or vengeance, but by His perfect, atoning work. His kingdom is not built on the sword or human retribution, but on grace, offering a security and an inheritance far beyond what Jacob could ever achieve for his family (Ephesians 2:14-16).