TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Genesis 34:6–17. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Jacob's sons, when they heard of the injury done to Dinah, showed a very great resentment of it, influenced perhaps rather by jealousy for the honour of their family than by a sense of virtue. Many are concerned at the shamefulness of sin that never lay to heart the sinfulness of it. It is here called folly in Israel (Gen 34:7), according to the language of after-times; for Israel was not yet a people, but a family only. Note, 1. Uncleanness is folly; for it sacrifices the favour of God, peace of conscience, and all the soul can pretend to that is sacred and honourable, to a base and brutish lust. 2. This folly is most shameful in Israel, in a family of Israel, where God is known and worshipped, as he was in Jacob's tents, by the name of the God of Israel. Folly in Israel is scandalous indeed. 3. It is a good thing to have sin stamped with a bad name: uncleanness is here proverbially called folly in Israel, Sa2 13:12. Dinah is here called Jacob's daughter, for warning to all the daughters of Israel, that they betray not themselves to this folly.
Hamor came to treat with Jacob himself, but he turns him over to his sons; and here we have a particular account of the treaty, in which, it is a shame to say, the Canaanites were more honest than the Israelites.
I.Hamor and Shechem fairly propose this match, in order to a coalition in trade.
Shechem is deeply in love with Dinah; he will have her upon any terms, Gen 34:11, Gen 34:12. His father not only consents, but solicits for him, and gravely insists upon the advantages that would follow from the union of the families, Gen 34:9, Gen 34:10. He shows no jealousy of Jacob, though he was a stranger, but rather an earnest desire to settle a correspondence with him and his family, making him that generous offer, The land shall be before you, trade you therein.
II.Jacob's sons basely pretend to insist upon a coalition in religion, when really they designed nothing less.
If Jacob had taken the management of this affair into his own hands, it is probable that he and Hamor would soon have concluded it; but Jacob's sons meditate only revenge, and a strange project they have for the compassing of it - the Shechemites must be circumcised; not to make them holy (they never intended that), but to make them sore, that they might become an easier prey to their sword.
1.The pretence was specious. "It is the honour of Jacob's family that they carry about with them the token of God's covenant with them; and it will be a reproach to those that are thus dignified and distinguished to enter into such a strict alliance with those that are uncircumcised (Gen 34:14); and therefore, if you will be circumcised, then we will become one people with you," Gen 34:15, Gen 34:16. Had they been sincere herein their proposal of these terms would have had in it something commendable; for Israelites should not intermarry with Canaanites, professors with profane; it is a great sin, or at least the cause and inlet of a great deal, and has often been of pernicious consequence. The interest we have in any persons, and the hold we have of them, should be wisely improved by us, to bring them to the love and practice of religion (He that winneth souls is wise); but then we must not, like Jacob's sons, think it enough to persuade them to submit to the external rites of religion, but must endeavour to convince them of its reasonableness, and to bring them acquainted with the power of it.
2.The intention was malicious, as appears by the sequel of the story; all they aimed at was to prepare them for the day of slaughter. Note, Bloody designs have often been covered, and carried on, with a pretence of religion; thus they have been accomplished most plausibly and most securely: but this dissembled piety is, doubtless, double iniquity. Religion is never more injured, nor are God's sacraments more profaned, than when they are thus used for a cloak of maliciousness. Nay, if Jacob's sons had not had this bloody design, I do not see how they could justify their offering the sacred sign of circumcision, the seal of God's covenant, to these devoted Canaanites, who had no part nor lot in the matter. Those had no right to the seal that had no right to the promise. It is not meet to take the children's bread, and cast it to dogs: but Jacob's sons valued not this, while they could make it serve their turn.
Continue studying Genesis 34:14 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Genesis 34:14 records the cunning and deceptive response of Jacob's sons to Hamor and Shechem's proposal for intermarriage following Dinah's defilement. Cloaking their true, vengeful intentions in a veneer of religious piety, they declare their inability to give their sister to an uncircumcised man, asserting that such an act would bring an intolerable "reproach" upon their family and covenant identity, thereby setting a trap for the Hivites.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is situated at a pivotal and deeply disturbing point in the narrative of Jacob's family, immediately following the traumatic violation of Dinah by Shechem, the son of Hamor the Hivite. The initial reaction of Jacob's sons, particularly Simeon and Levi, is one of profound outrage and a burning desire for vengeance, which is explicitly stated in Genesis 34:7. Hamor and Shechem then approach Jacob and his sons with a proposal for a broad alliance, including intermarriage and shared land, seemingly offering a peaceful resolution. However, the sons' response in Genesis 34:14 is not a genuine negotiation but a calculated act of deception. Their demand for circumcision is presented as a religious and honorable condition, yet it serves as a sinister prelude to their brutal and premeditated act of retribution, which unfolds in the subsequent verses of Genesis 34.
Historical & Cultural Context
In the ancient Near East, family honor was paramount, forming the bedrock of social identity and standing. The defilement of Dinah was not merely a personal affront but a profound public disgrace (a "reproach" or cherpâh) upon Jacob's entire household, demanding a response to restore honor. Circumcision, as established in Genesis 17:9-14, was the physical sign of God's covenant with Abraham and his descendants, marking them as a distinct and holy people set apart for Yahweh. To intermarry with the uncircumcised was seen as a blurring of this sacred boundary and a potential dilution of their unique identity. While the Hivites likely viewed intermarriage as a means of assimilation and strengthening alliances, Jacob's sons exploited the cultural significance of honor and the religious imperative of circumcision to manipulate their adversaries, knowing that the physical pain of circumcision would render the Hivite men vulnerable.
Key Themes
Genesis 34:14 contributes significantly to several major themes within the book of Genesis and the broader Pentateuch. It highlights the theme of covenant identity and distinctiveness, underscoring the early importance of circumcision as a boundary marker between God's chosen people and the surrounding nations, a theme that would later be codified in Mosaic Law (e.g., Deuteronomy 7:3-4). The verse also powerfully illustrates the theme of honor and shame (cherpâh), demonstrating how deeply embedded these concepts were in ancient society and how they could drive extreme actions. Most critically, it introduces the dark themes of deception and vengeance within the family of Jacob, revealing the moral failings even of those within the covenant line. This incident serves as a stark warning against the perversion of religious principles for ungodly ends, contrasting sharply with the divine justice and mercy that God consistently demonstrates throughout the patriarchal narratives, even amidst human sinfulness.
Exposition and Analysis
The statement of Jacob's sons, "And they said unto them, We cannot do this thing, to give our sister to one that is uncircumcised; for that [were] a reproach unto us," reveals a complex interplay of covenant identity, cultural honor, and sinister deception.
Key Word Analysis
This word, derived from a root meaning "to speak," encompasses a wide range of meanings including "word," "matter," "affair," "deed," or "business." In this context, "this thing" refers to the entire proposition of intermarriage and alliance with the Hivites. The use of dâbâr here emphasizes the weighty nature of the "matter" being discussed, which for Jacob's sons was not merely a social arrangement but a profound issue touching upon their identity and honor.
This term literally refers to the "prepuce" or "foreskin" and, by extension, to an "uncircumcised" person. In ancient Israelite thought, to be uncircumcised was to be outside the covenant community of God, a Gentile, and often viewed with disdain. It was a physical mark that signified spiritual and communal separation. Jacob's sons strategically invoke this highly significant religious and cultural distinction to justify their refusal, presenting it as an insurmountable barrier to intermarriage, while secretly planning their vengeful act.
This powerful word signifies "contumely," "disgrace," "shame," "humiliation," or "public scandal." It conveys a deep sense of dishonor that wounds one's reputation and standing in the community. Dinah's defilement had already brought immense cherpâh upon Jacob's household. The sons' claim that giving their sister to an uncircumcised man would be a further "reproach" indicates their acute awareness of social honor and their manipulation of this cultural value. They are not merely stating a fact but appealing to a profound sense of public shame to make their demand seem legitimate and compelling to the Hivites.
Verse Breakdown
"And they said unto them,"
This opening clause establishes the direct communication between Jacob's sons (specifically Simeon and Levi, though presented as a collective "they") and Hamor and Shechem. It sets the stage for the deceptive negotiation that is about to unfold.
"We cannot do this thing,"
This statement expresses an absolute refusal, framed as an impossibility rather than a choice. The "thing" refers to the proposed intermarriage and alliance. By stating they "cannot" rather than "will not," they subtly imply that their hands are tied by a higher principle, lending a false air of integrity to their subsequent condition.
"to give our sister to one that is uncircumcised;"
Here, the specific and seemingly insurmountable obstacle is revealed: the uncircumcised status of Shechem and, by extension, the Hivite men. This clause leverages the profound religious and cultural significance of circumcision as the sign of the Abrahamic covenant, presenting it as the non-negotiable barrier to any union.
"for that [were] a reproach unto us:"
This final clause provides the justification for their refusal, rooted in the concept of honor and shame. Giving their sister to an uncircumcised man would, in their stated view, bring deep disgrace and public humiliation upon their family, compounding the existing dishonor from Dinah's defilement. This appeal to cherpâh (reproach) is a calculated rhetorical device, designed to make their demand for circumcision appear as a matter of unavoidable principle and profound family honor, thereby masking their true, malicious intent.
Literary Devices
The primary literary device at play in Genesis 34:14 is Irony. The sons of Jacob present a seemingly pious and principled objection rooted in their covenant identity (circumcision as a sign of distinction), claiming that intermarriage with the uncircumcised would bring "reproach." However, this stated concern for honor and religious purity is deeply ironic, as their true motive is not to uphold the covenant but to exact brutal vengeance. They manipulate a sacred sign of God's covenant for a deceptive and violent end, turning a symbol of blessing and separation into a tool for bloodshed. This Dramatic Irony is evident to the reader, who knows the sons' true intentions (foreshadowed in Genesis 34:13) while the Hivites remain oblivious, making their subsequent downfall even more tragic. Furthermore, the concept of Reproach itself functions as a powerful motif, highlighting the cultural significance of honor and shame in the ancient world, and how the perception of dishonor can drive extreme and sinful actions.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Genesis 34:14 is a crucial text for understanding the early development of covenant identity and the dangers of religious hypocrisy. While circumcision was indeed the physical sign of God's covenant with Abraham, distinguishing his descendants, Jacob's sons perverted this sacred mark. They used a legitimate religious principle as a pretext for deceit and a means to execute a brutal, premeditated act of vengeance, demonstrating that outward adherence to religious law without inward righteousness is a profound moral failure. This narrative foreshadows later biblical themes concerning the importance of Israel's distinctiveness from the nations, but also serves as a stark warning against using God's commands to justify human sin and self-serving ambition.
Reflection and Application
Genesis 34:14 serves as a potent and uncomfortable mirror for believers today, challenging us to examine the purity of our motives behind outwardly religious actions. While it is vital for Christians to maintain a distinct identity, uphold God's truth, and live by His principles, this verse powerfully illustrates the severe perversion that occurs when those principles are used as a pretext for deceit, manipulation, or vengeance. Jacob's sons prioritized their own wrath and perceived honor over God's character, justice, and mercy, demonstrating how even outwardly pious acts can mask deeply sinful intentions. True faith calls for integrity, transparency, and a commitment to justice and mercy that reflects God's heart, not cunning and violence. We are called to live distinct lives, marked not by physical rituals alone, but by a "circumcision of the heart" that transforms our inner being (Romans 2:29), leading us to reflect God's righteousness and love in all our dealings, rather than using spiritual truths to justify ungodly ends.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was circumcision so important to Jacob's sons in this context?
For Jacob's sons, circumcision was not merely a physical act but the foundational sign of God's covenant with Abraham, marking his descendants as God's chosen people, set apart from the surrounding nations. To give their sister to an uncircumcised man was seen as a profound defilement of this sacred identity and a public disgrace or "reproach" (H2781 cherpâh) in their eyes. However, their stated concern for this covenant sign was largely a deceptive pretense for their vengeful plot, as they used it to manipulate the Hivites.
Did Jacob's sons act righteously by upholding the covenant sign?
While the principle of maintaining covenant distinctiveness was valid and would later be codified in Mosaic Law, their motivation was profoundly corrupted by deceit, malice, and vengeance. They used a sacred requirement as a pretext for a violent and sinful act, demonstrating that outward adherence to religious law without inward righteousness is a perversion. Their actions were condemned by Jacob himself in Genesis 34:30-31 and ultimately did not honor God. The narrative highlights the danger of religious hypocrisy.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The outward sign of circumcision, so zealously (though deceptively) upheld by Jacob's sons as a mark of distinction and a barrier to the "uncircumcised," points forward to the spiritual reality fulfilled in Christ. The Old Covenant's physical mark symbolized separation and belonging to God, but it could not truly transform the heart or prevent sin and hypocrisy, as tragically demonstrated by Simeon and Levi. Christ establishes a New Covenant where true "circumcision" is not physical but of the heart, a spiritual work performed by the Spirit, not by human hands or external law (Romans 2:29). Through His atoning sacrifice, Jesus breaks down the dividing wall of hostility between Jew and Gentile, overcoming the "reproach" of being outside the covenant. He creates one new humanity in Himself, reconciling both groups to God in one body through the cross (Ephesians 2:11-16). Unlike Jacob's sons, who sought honor through violent retribution and deceit, Christ achieved true honor and redemption through humble suffering and self-sacrifice on the cross (Philippians 2:8-9), offering a path to reconciliation and peace that utterly transcends the cycle of vengeance and human-driven "reproach."