Genesis 34:23

KJV

[Shall] not their cattle and their substance and every beast of theirs [be] ours? only let us consent unto them, and they will dwell with us.

KJV (with Strong's)

Shall not their cattle {H4735} and their substance {H7075} and every beast {H929} of theirs be ours? only let us consent {H225} unto them, and they will dwell {H3427} with us.

Complete Jewish Bible

Won't their cattle, their possessions and all their animals be ours? Only let's consent to do what they ask, and then they will live with us."

Berean Standard Bible

Will not their livestock, their possessions, and all their animals become ours? Only let us consent to them, and they will dwell among us.”

American Standard Version

Shall not their cattle and their substance and all their beasts be ours? only let us consent unto them, and they will dwell with us.

Commentary

### SUMMARY
Genesis 34:23 presents the manipulative argument employed by Hamor, the prince of Shechem, and his son Shechem, to persuade their city's men to undergo circumcision. They cunningly framed the painful ritual as a strategic economic maneuver, promising that the extensive material wealth of Jacob’s family—their "cattle and their substance and every beast of theirs"—would eventually become the collective property of the Shechemites. This proposal was made under the guise of accepting the terms put forth by Jacob's sons, who were, unbeknownst to the Shechemites, secretly plotting a brutal act of vengeance.

### CONTEXT
* **Literary Context:** Genesis 34:23 is a pivotal moment within a deeply disturbing narrative that begins with the defilement of Dinah, Jacob's only recorded daughter, by Shechem, the son of Hamor, the Hivite prince ([see Genesis 34:2](/genesis/34-2 "The Defilement of Dinah")). Following this act, Jacob's sons, particularly Simeon and Levi, devise a treacherous plan. They respond to Hamor and Shechem's proposal for intermarriage and assimilation with a deceptive condition: all males in Shechem must be circumcised ([see Genesis 34:15](/genesis/34-15 "The Deceptive Demand for Circumcision")). Verse 23 is part of Hamor and Shechem's persuasive speech to their own people, attempting to convince them to undergo the painful and culturally significant ritual by appealing to their materialistic desires. This verse sets the stage for the violent retribution that follows, highlighting the Shechemites' fatal misjudgment and the sons' ruthless cunning. The chapter concludes with Jacob's strong disapproval of his sons' extreme actions, underscoring the moral ambiguity and tragic consequences of their vengeance.
* **Historical & Cultural Context:** In the ancient Near East, intermarriage and assimilation between tribes or clans were common ways to form alliances and expand influence. However, circumcision was a unique and deeply significant practice for the descendants of Abraham, serving as the physical sign of God's covenant with them ([see Genesis 17:10-14](/genesis/17-10-14 "The Covenant of Circumcision")). For the Shechemites, a non-Israelite people, undergoing circumcision would have been an extraordinary and painful act, likely viewed as a profound cultural and religious conversion. The proposal for them to do so for economic gain, as presented by Hamor and Shechem, reveals a pragmatic, opportunistic mindset common in tribal societies where wealth (especially livestock) and population size were direct indicators of power and prosperity. The narrative also reflects the strong emphasis on family honor and the severe consequences for its violation in ancient cultures, which fueled the sons' vengeful response.
* **Key Themes:** This verse contributes to several overarching themes in Genesis 34 and the broader book. Firstly, it powerfully illustrates the theme of **deception and treachery**, as both Jacob's sons and the Shechemite leaders engage in manipulative tactics. The sons use a sacred covenant sign as a pretext for violence, while Hamor and Shechem exploit their people's covetousness. Secondly, the narrative highlights the destructive consequences of **materialism over morality**. Hamor and Shechem's willingness to subject their entire male population to a painful ritual for purely economic gain exposes a profound moral compromise, demonstrating how the pursuit of worldly wealth can blind individuals to ethical considerations and lead to disaster. Finally, the chapter, including this verse, serves as a stark example of the **cycle of sin and its devastating repercussions**, where one act of violence begets another, leading to widespread suffering and loss, a theme echoed throughout the early narratives of Genesis, such as the story of [Cain and Abel](/genesis/4 "Cain's Sin and Its Consequences").

### EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
In Genesis 34:23, Hamor and Shechem articulate their calculated appeal to the Shechemite men, framing the proposed circumcision as a financially advantageous move. Their argument is a masterclass in manipulation, designed to convince their people that by agreeing to Jacob's family's terms, they would not only gain new inhabitants but also absorb their considerable assets.

#### Key Word Analysis
* **Cattle (Hebrew, _miqneh'_):** From H4735, this term specifically refers to "something bought, i.e. property, but only livestock; abstractly, acquisition." In this context, it emphasizes the significant herds and flocks belonging to Jacob's prosperous household, which constituted a primary form of wealth and sustenance in the ancient world. Hamor and Shechem are appealing to the tangible, visible signs of wealth that would enrich their community.
* **Substance (Hebrew, _qinyân'_):** From H7075, this word denotes "creation, i.e. (concretely) creatures; also acquisition, purchase, wealth." Unlike `miqneh`, `qinyân` is a broader term encompassing all forms of acquired property, including not just livestock but also servants, precious metals, and other movable goods. Its inclusion alongside "cattle" and "beast" underscores the comprehensive nature of the wealth the Shechemites coveted, signifying all that Jacob's family had accumulated.
* **Consent (Hebrew, _ʼûwth'_):** From H225, this primitive root means "properly, to come, i.e. (implied) to assent." In this verse, it highlights the Shechemites' willingness to agree to the terms proposed by Jacob's sons. However, this "consent" is not born of genuine desire for peace or spiritual alignment, but is explicitly swayed by the promise of illicit material gain, revealing the profound moral compromise of the Shechemite leaders and their people.

#### Verse Breakdown
* **"Shall not their cattle and their substance and every beast of theirs be ours?"**: This rhetorical question is the core of Hamor and Shechem's persuasive strategy. By listing "cattle," "substance," and "every beast," they comprehensively describe Jacob's family's wealth, appealing directly to the materialistic desires of their townsmen. The question implies an obvious "yes," suggesting that the acquisition of this wealth is a natural and desirable outcome of the proposed integration. It frames the circumcision, a painful and culturally alien act, as a small price to pay for significant economic benefit.
* **"only let us consent unto them, and they will dwell with us."**: This clause presents the condition for the promised acquisition of wealth. The phrase "consent unto them" (from H225, `ʼûwth`) indicates a willing agreement to the terms, specifically the circumcision. The subsequent phrase, "and they will dwell with us" (from H3427, `yâshab`), implies full integration and cohabitation. The Shechemite leaders envision a future where, through intermarriage and shared residency, Jacob's family's prosperity would naturally merge with and enhance their own, solidifying their community's power and affluence. This reveals their short-sighted focus on material gain over the ethical implications of the agreement.

#### Literary Devices
The verse primarily employs **Rhetorical Question** ("Shall not their cattle...be ours?") to persuade the Shechemite men by presenting the acquisition of wealth as an undeniable and attractive outcome. This technique is designed to elicit an affirmative response, making the proposed circumcision seem like a logical and beneficial decision. Furthermore, the repetition and comprehensive listing of "cattle and their substance and every beast of theirs" serves as a form of **Enumeration** or **Accumulation**, emphasizing the vastness and desirability of Jacob's family's possessions. This highlights the Shechemite leaders' materialistic motivations and their attempt to appeal to the covetousness of their people. The entire passage also functions as **Dramatic Irony**, as the audience knows the true, vengeful intentions of Jacob's sons, while the Shechemites remain tragically unaware, making their economic calculation a fatal error.

### THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
The narrative of Genesis 34, and particularly verse 23, serves as a stark theological commentary on the destructive nature of sin, especially when fueled by covetousness and deceit. The Shechemite leaders' willingness to compromise their people's well-being for material gain, coupled with Jacob's sons' cynical misuse of a sacred covenant sign for vengeance, reveals a profound moral bankruptcy on all sides. This episode underscores the tragic consequences when human actions are driven by self-interest and worldly desires rather than by divine principles of justice, truth, and grace. It is a powerful reminder that true peace and prosperity cannot be built on foundations of treachery or the exploitation of others.

* [Proverbs 1:19](/proverbs/1-19 "The Peril of Ill-Gotten Gain"): "So are the ways of every one that is greedy of gain; which taketh away the life of the owners thereof."
* [1 Timothy 6:10](/1_timothy/6-10 "The Root of All Evil"): "For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows."
* [James 4:1-2](/james/4-1-2 "The Source of Conflicts"): "From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members? Ye lust, and have not: ye kill, and desire to have, and cannot obtain: ye fight and war, yet ye have not, because ye ask not."

### REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
Genesis 34:23 stands as a timeless warning against the seductive power of materialism and the perilous path of making decisions based solely on the promise of quick wealth. It challenges us to critically examine our own motivations, both individually and communally, when faced with opportunities that promise gain but may compromise our integrity or the well-being of others. The Shechemites' tragic downfall, rooted in their covetousness, reminds us that prioritizing tangible assets over ethical considerations, genuine relationships, or spiritual principles can lead to unforeseen and devastating consequences. True and lasting prosperity, whether personal or societal, is never built on deception, exploitation, or the pursuit of illicit gain. Instead, it is founded on righteousness, truth, and a commitment to the welfare of all, reflecting the wisdom that "better is a little with righteousness than great revenues without right" ([Proverbs 16:8](/proverbs/16-8 "Righteousness and Riches")). This narrative compels us to consider the long-term ripple effects of our choices and to seek God's wisdom in discerning true value from fleeting worldly allure.

#### Questions for Reflection
* **How might the pursuit of material gain blind individuals or communities to moral and ethical considerations today?**
* **In what ways might we be tempted to compromise our values or spiritual commitments for perceived worldly advantages?**
* **What lessons can we draw from the Shechemites' fate regarding the importance of discerning true intentions and building relationships on a foundation of trust rather than self-interest?**

### FAQ
**Why did Hamor and Shechem believe Jacob's wealth would become theirs?**

Answer: Hamor and Shechem operated under the assumption that through intermarriage and the full integration of Jacob's family into their community, the substantial wealth of Jacob's prosperous household—including his numerous flocks, herds, and other possessions—would naturally merge with and enrich their own. They envisioned a future where the two groups would become one people, and thus, Jacob's assets would become collective Shechemite property. Their perspective was purely economic and opportunistic, viewing Jacob's family as a valuable acquisition rather than as individuals with whom to form a genuine covenant or relationship. This is evident in their rhetorical question in [Genesis 34:23](/genesis/34-23 "Hamor and Shechem's Economic Argument"), which highlights their covetous focus on the material gain.

**What is the significance of circumcision in this narrative?**

Answer: Circumcision held profound significance as the physical sign of God's covenant with Abraham and his descendants, symbolizing their unique relationship with God and their identity as a set-apart, holy people ([see Genesis 17:9-14](/genesis/17-9-14 "The Sign of the Abrahamic Covenant")). In Genesis 34, however, this sacred ritual is tragically desecrated and misused. Jacob's sons, particularly Simeon and Levi, exploit it as a deceptive means to exact vengeance for their sister Dinah's defilement, using it as a pretext for a violent attack. Conversely, Hamor and Shechem view it merely as a painful prerequisite for material gain, a transactional cost for acquiring Jacob's wealth. This narrative thus highlights the profound spiritual danger when a holy sign is treated as a mere cultural custom or a tool for worldly advantage, rather than a symbol of genuine spiritual commitment and obedience to God.

### CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The tragic events of Genesis 34, particularly the materialistic deception highlighted in verse 23, vividly expose the depths of humanity's fallen state, characterized by covetousness, treachery, and violence. In stark contrast to the false covenant and treacherous peace offered by both parties in Shechem, Jesus Christ establishes a new and true covenant, not based on ritualistic manipulation or the pursuit of worldly gain, but on His own perfect and atoning sacrifice. Where the Shechemites sought earthly wealth and Jacob's sons sought vengeful satisfaction, Christ offers spiritual riches and genuine forgiveness, breaking the cycle of sin and violence through His redemptive work on the cross ([see Colossians 2:13-14](/colossians/2-13-14 "Forgiveness and the Abolition of the Law")). He is the ultimate fulfillment of the covenant, offering true reconciliation and peace that transcends material possessions or deceptive schemes. His kingdom is "not of this world" ([John 18:36](/john/18-36 "Jesus' Kingdom Is Not of This World")), and He invites humanity into a relationship built on truth, grace, and eternal life, a life free from the destructive grip of covetousness and vengeance that plagued the characters in Genesis 34 ([see Matthew 6:19-21](/matthew/6-19-21 "Treasures in Heaven")).

Note: Commentary is generated by AI with a directive for Biblical fidelity. Always rely on the Holy Spirit for discernment. The Scripture text and cross-references are from verified, non-AI sources.

Cross-References

Proverbs 1:12

Let us swallow them up alive as the grave; and whole, as those that go down into the pit:

Proverbs 1:13

We shall find all precious substance, we shall fill our houses with spoil:

1 Timothy 6:6

¶ But godliness with contentment is great gain.

1 Timothy 6:10

For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.

John 6:26

Jesus answered them and said, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Ye seek me, not because ye saw the miracles, but because ye did eat of the loaves, and were filled.

John 6:27

Labour not for the meat which perisheth, but for that meat which endureth unto everlasting life, which the Son of man shall give unto you: for him hath God the Father sealed.

Proverbs 23:4

¶ Labour not to be rich: cease from thine own wisdom.