Genesis 13:7
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- וַיְהִיvay·hiand it wasH1961Conj-w ¦ V-Qal-ConsecImperf-3msVerb Qal Consecutive Imperfect 3rd Singular Masculineוַandיְהִיit was
- רִיבRivquarrelingH7379N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absolute
- בֵּיןbeinbetweenH996Adj-mscAdjective Numerical Singular Masculine Construct
- רֹעֵיro·'Ei[the] herdsmen ofH7462V-Qal-Prtcpl-mpVerb Qal Participle Plural Masculine Construct
- מִקְנֵהmik·neh[the] livestock ofH4735N-mscNoun Singular Masculine Construct
- אַבְרָם'av·RamAbramH87N-proper-mNoun Proper Masculine
- וּבֵיןu·Veinand betweenH996Conj-w ¦ Adj-mscAdjective Numerical Singular Masculine Constructוּandבֵיןbetween
- רֹעֵיro·'Ei[the] herdsmen ofH7462V-Qal-Prtcpl-mpVerb Qal Participle Plural Masculine Construct
- מִקְנֵהmik·neh[the] livestock ofH4735N-mscNoun Singular Masculine Construct
- לוֹטLotLotH3876N-proper-mNoun Proper Masculine
- וְהַכְּנַעֲנִיve·ha·ke·na·'a·Niand the Canaanite[s]H3669Conj-w ¦ Art ¦ N-msNoun Gentilic Singular Masculine AbsoluteוְandהַtheכְּנַעֲנִיCanaanite[s]
- וְהַפְּרִזִּיve·hap·pe·ri·Ziand the Perizzite[s]H6522Conj-w ¦ Art ¦ N-msNoun Gentilic Singular Masculine AbsoluteוְandהַtheפְּרִזִּיPerizzite[s]
- אָז'azthenH227AdvAdverb
- יֹשֵׁבyo·Shev[was] dwellingH3427V-Qal-Prtcpl-msVerb Qal Participle Singular Masculine Absolute
- בָּאָרֶץba·'A·retzin the landH776Prep-b ¦ N-fsNoun Singular Feminine Absoluteבָּin theאָרֶץland
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
See on the biblical-era maps



Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Genesis 13:5–9. He set out his notes in a three-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
We have here an unhappy falling out between Abram and Lot, who had hitherto been inseparable companions (see Genesis 13:1, and Genesis 12:4), but now parted.
I.The occasion of their quarrel was their riches.
We read (Genesis 13:2) how rich Abram was; now here we are told (Genesis 13:5) that Lot, who went with Abram, was rich too; and therefore God blessed him with riches because he went with Abram. Note,
1.It is good being in good company, and going with those with whom God is, Zechariah 8:23.
2.Those that are partners with God's people in their obedience and sufferings shall be sharers with them in their joys and comforts, Isaiah 66:10. Now, they both being very rich, the land was not able to bear them, that they might dwell comfortably and peaceably together. So that their riches may be considered,
(1.)As setting them at a distance one from another. Because the place was too strait for them, and they had not room for their stock, it was necessary they should live asunder. Note, Every comfort in this world has its cross attending it. Business is a comfort; but it has this inconvenience in it, that it allows us not the society of those we love, so often, nor so long, as we could wish.
(2.)As setting them at variance one with another. Note, Riches are often an occasion of strife and contention among relations and neighbours. this is one of those foolish and hurtful lusts which those that will be rich fall into, 1 Timothy 6:9. Riches not only afford matter for contention, and are the things most commonly striven about, but they also stir up a spirit of contention, by making people proud and covetous. Meum and tuum - Mine and thine, are the great make-bates of the world. Poverty and travail, wants and wanderings, could not separate between Abram and Lot; but riches did. Friends are soon lost; but God is a friend from whose love neither the height of prosperity nor the depth of adversity shall separate us.
II.The immediate instruments of the quarrel were their servants.
The strife began between the herdsmen of Abram's cattle and the herdsmen of Lot's cattle, Genesis 13:7. They strove, it is probable, which should have the better pasture or the better water; and both interested their masters in the quarrel. Note, Bad servants often make a great deal of mischief in families, by the pride and passion, their lying slandering, and tale-bearing. It is a very wicked thing for servants to do ill offices between relations and neighbours, and to sow discord; those that do so are the devil's agents and their masters' worst enemies.
III.The aggravation of the quarrel was that the Canaanite and the Perizzite dwelt then in the land; this made the quarrel,
1.Very dangerous. If Abram and Lot cannot agree to feed their flocks together, it is well if the common enemy do not come upon them and plunder them both. Note, The division of families and churches often proves the ruin of them.
2.Very scandalous. No doubt the eyes of all the neighbours were upon them, especially because of the singularity of their religion, and the extraordinary sanctity they professed; and notice would soon be taken of this quarrel, and improvement made of it, to their reproach, by the Canaanites and Perizzites. Note, The quarrels of professors are the reproach of profession, and give occasion, as much as any thing, to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme.
IV.The making up of this quarrel was very happy.
It is best to preserve the peace, that it be not broken; but the next best is, if differences do happen, with all speed to accommodate them, and quench the fire that has broken out. The motion for staying this strife was made by Abram, though he was the senior and superior relation, Genesis 13:8.
1.His petition for peace was very affectionate: Let there be not strife, I pray thee. Abram here shows himself to be a man, (1.) of a cool spirit, that had the command of his passion, and knew how to turn away wrath with a soft answer. Those that would keep the peace must never render railing for railing. (2.) Of a condescending spirit; he was willing to beseech even his inferior to be at peace, and made the first overture of reconciliation. Conquerors reckon it their glory to give peace by power; and it is no less so to give peace by the meekness of wisdom. Note, The people of God should always approve themselves a peaceable people; whatever others are for, they must be for peace.
2.His plea for peace was very cogent. (1.) "Let there be no strife between me and thee. Let the Canaanites and Perizzites contend about trifles; but let not thee and me fall out, who know better things, and look for a better country." Note, Professors of religion should, of all others, be careful to avoid contention. You shall not be so, Luke 22:26. We have no such custom, 1 Corinthians 11:16. "Let there be no strife between me and thee, who have lived together and loved one another so long." Note, The remembrance of old friendships should quickly put an end to new quarrels which at any time happen. (2.) Let it be remembered that we are brethren, Heb. we are men brethren; a double argument. [1.] We are men; and, as men, we are mortal creatures - we may die tomorrow, and are concerned to be found in peace. We are rational creatures, and should be ruled by reason. We are men, and not brutes, men, and not children; we are sociable creatures, let us be so to the uttermost. [2.] We are brethren. Men of the same nature, of the same kindred and family, of the same religion, companions in obedience, companions in patience. Note, The consideration of our relation to each other, as brethren, should always prevail to moderate our passions, and either to prevent or put an end to our contentions. Brethren should love as brethren.
3.His proposal for peace was very fair. Many who profess to be for peace yet will do nothing towards it; but Abram hereby approved himself a real friend to peace that he proposed an unexceptionable expedient for the preserving of it: Is not the whole land before thee? Genesis 13:9. As if he had said, "Why should we quarrel for room, while there is room enough for us both?" (1.) He concludes that they must part, and is very desirous that they should part friends: Separate thyself, I pray thee, from me. What could be expressed more affectionately? He does not expel him, and force him away, but advises that he should separate himself. Nor does he charge him to depart, but humbly desires him to withdraw. Note, Those that have power to command, yet sometimes, for love's sake, and peace' sake, should rather beseech us, we may well afford to beseech one another, to be reconciled, 2 Corinthians 5:20. (2.) He offers him a sufficient share of the land they were in. Though God had promised Abram to give this land to his seed (Genesis 12:7), and it does not appear that ever any such promise was made to Lot, which Abram might have insisted on, to the total exclusion of Lot, yet he allows him to come in partner with him, and tenders an equal share to one that had not an equal right, and will not make God's promise to patronise his quarrel, nor, under the protection of that, put any hardship on his kinsman. (3.) He give him his choice, and offers to take up with his leavings: If thou wilt take the left hand, I will go to the right. There was all the reason in the world that Abram should choose first; yet he recedes from his right. Note, It is a noble conquest to be willing to yield for peace' sake; it is the conquest of ourselves, and our own pride and passion, Matthew 5:39, Matthew 5:40. It is not only the punctilios of honour, but even interest itself, that in many cases must be sacrificed to peace.
Historical interpretation
Three Centuries of Reception
3 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Let us now consider who are the shepherds, and what living creatures they shepherd and what was the nature of the dispute between the shepherds of Abraham and those of Lot. Shepherds are those who govern the flocks. They are diligent and wise when they do not allow their animals to trample the farmlands with their feet or to damage the crops with their teeth. [They are] negligent and lazy when they do not invite their cattle to pasture on grassy fields rather than in planted areas but allow them to wander freely through the various garden crops. These shepherds then should be watchfully attentive so that what has happened through the carelessness of the negligent be not attributed to the diligent.But since we are here not speaking of visible things, let us first of all consider what kind of animal they have to shepherd. We can supply a definition of these shepherds: “they are shepherds of cattle,” says the text. Now cattle, as we have said, signify the irrational senses of the body. Who then are the shepherds of the senses, if not their masters and, in a certain sense, their rulers and guides, that is to say, the monitors of a certain way of speaking or the thoughts of our mind? If these are expert and constant in the pastoral exercise, they do not permit the flock of the senses to wander off and to stop to graze in useless or positively harmful pastures, but with wise leadership they call them back and apply the brakes of reason to block their activity when they rebel. But the bad leaders or useless disputes allow the cattle to be carried away by their own impulsiveness, to run toward the precipice, to trample on planted fields and to feed on their produce, so much so that if at present there are still fruits of virtue to be found, they destroy even these.
Notice how the abundance of their possessions proved to be a major cause for their separation, creating a division, sundering their harmony and undoing the bond of kinship. “Trouble developed between Abram’s herdsmen and Lot’s herdsmen. Now the Canaanites and the Pherezites inhabited the land at that time.” Notice how the relatives are responsible for the first signs of separation. Invariably this is the source from which springs all sorts of problems—discord among the brethren. The text says, remember, “Trouble developed between the herdsmen.” They are the ones who provide the occasion for separation, who sunder the harmony, who give evidence of bad feeling.
But Lot also, who was with Abram, had flocks of sheep, and herds, and tents; nor could the land bear them so that they might dwell together: for their substance was great, and they could not dwell together: hence there was a quarrel between the herdsmen of Abram's flocks and Lot's, and it is detailed how Lot departed from Abraham with their love preserved, preferring to separate physically from his dearest and most holy brother rather than to remain with him amidst scandals and disputes, which were troubling the weak ones; yet he in no way let his bodily separation from him separate him from the deepest love of his mind, as the following sacred history most clearly proves: where having been captured by enemies, he saved him with all his might with his men, and rightly so because Lot himself did not at all alter the course of virtue and faith, which he had been accustomed to practice with his elder brother, even living apart.
Continue studying Genesis 13:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
Abram’s herdmen and Lot’s herdmen quarrelled over the land, while the Canaanite and the Perizzite were settled all around them.
“And there was a strife”
A real dispute, rîyb, over grazing and water.
“between the herdmen of Abram’s cattle and the herdmen of Lot’s cattle:”
The servants quarrelled first, and their masters’ peace was at stake.
“and the Canaanite and the Perizzite dwelled then in the land.”
“Then” marks the time of the story. The land was already settled by others, who saw how Abram’s household behaved.
Abram Gives Way and Lot Chooses the Plain
Genesis 13:5–13
Summary
Abram and his nephew Lot come back from Egypt so rich in flocks and herds that the land between Bethel and Ai is too small for both households, and their herdmen quarrel while the Canaanite and the Perizzite live all around them. Abram, the elder, asks for peace because they are brethren, and he lets Lot choose first where to go. Lot looks out over the plain of Jordan, watered everywhere like the garden of the LORD, takes it for himself and pitches his tent toward Sodom, whose men were wicked and sinners before the LORD exceedingly. Here a man who trusts what God has promised stands beside a man who chooses by what his eyes can see.
Two households too rich for one land
The passage opens just after Abram has come back from Egypt to the place between Bethel and Ai, where he had built an altar and called on the name of the LORD (Genesis 13:1–4). He has come back very rich in livestock, silver and gold, and verse 5 adds, “And Lot also, which went with Abram, had flocks, and herds, and tents.” Lot, Lôwṭ, is Abram’s nephew. The verb “went”, hâlak, is the everyday word for walking or going, and here it describes Lot travelling at Abram’s side.
Lot’s wealth grew while he went with Abram, and God had promised to bless Abram and make him a blessing (Genesis 12:2–3). Lot shared in that blessing because he was with the man God had called. The covenant promises themselves, of land, of a great nation and of blessing for all the families of the earth, stayed with Abram alone.
Among herdsmen like Abram and Lot, wealth was counted in animals. Flocks are sheep and goats, herds are cattle, and together they gave food, milk, clothing and goods to trade. The word for tent, ʼôhel, is explained by Strong’s as a tent “clearly conspicuous from a distance”. Every tent meant people, servants and dependents as well as family, so a man’s tents showed the size of his household. Land was mostly held in common, and what a herdsman needed was the right to graze it, with good pasture always in demand.
Verse 6 gives the result: “the land was not able to bear them.” The word for land is ʼerets, and the verb “bear”, nâsâʼ, means to lift, carry or support a load. The pasture and water could carry only so much, and two such households were too heavy a load for them. The cause is given plainly: “for their substance was great”. The word rᵉkûwsh means property or goods, the things of value a person has acquired, and here it is above all livestock. The verse says twice that “they could not dwell together”, and the repeated words settle the matter.
So the trouble began with God’s blessing. The land had reached its limit before anyone quarrelled, even within the land God had promised, and the strife of verse 7 grew out of that limit. “The blessing of the LORD, it maketh rich, and he addeth no sorrow with it” (Proverbs 10:22). The blessing was good, and the hard part was the handling of so much. Jesus warns, “Take heed, and beware of covetousness: for a man’s life consisteth not in the abundance of the things which he possesseth” (Luke 12:15), and Hebrews joins contentment with the promise of God’s presence (Hebrews 13:5). Proverbs ties contention to pride (Proverbs 13:10), and the verses that follow show which of these two men held his possessions loosely.
Strife between the herdmen, in sight of the Canaanite
The quarrel broke out among the herdmen, the servants who drove and watered the animals, Abram’s men against Lot’s. The word for strife, rîyb, means a contest or dispute, whether personal or legal, and this was a real contention over grass and water. It touched the two masters as well, because their men were quarrelling on their behalf and the family’s unity was at stake.
Then comes the note, “and the Canaanite and the Perizzite dwelled then in the land.” The verb yâshab means to sit down, and so to settle or dwell. These peoples were settled in the land with their own claim on its pasture and wells, which left even less for Abram and Lot. The Kᵉnaʻanîy, the Canaanites, were a broad people often connected with trade, and the Pᵉrizzîy, the Perizzites, were the people of the open country.
Their presence also meant that the quarrel went on in front of neighbours who did not know the LORD. Abram’s household was the family God had called, and the way it lived was watched. Israel would later be told that keeping God’s law would show its wisdom and understanding in the sight of the nations (Deuteronomy 4:6–8), and Peter tells believers to live so honestly among unbelievers that, seeing their good works, they glorify God (1 Peter 2:12). The same note reminds us that the land God had promised Abram was still in other hands, and the promise waited on God to fulfil it, as he assured Abram once Lot had gone (Genesis 13:14–18).
Abram’s plea for peace: “for we be brethren”
Abram speaks first. He is the elder and the one to whom God has given the promises, and he takes the matter up himself before it grows worse. “Let there be no strife, I pray thee” is a request, softened by “I pray thee”, the Hebrew word naʼ, which means please. “Let there be” is the verb hâyâh, to be or to come to pass, and Abram asks for an end to strife between them. The word for strife here is mᵉrîybâh, a quarrel or provocation. It is a different Hebrew word from the rîyb of verse 7, though the KJV gives “strife” for both.
Abram names himself first: “between me and thee”. He takes his share of the trouble along with Lot, and only then names “my herdmen and thy herdmen”. The servants’ quarrel has become a matter between the two kinsmen, and Abram deals with it there.
His reason is “for we be brethren”. The word ʼâch means brother, and Scripture uses it widely, for a brother born of the same parents, for a near kinsman and for others bound by close ties. Lot was Abram’s nephew, and Abram reaches for the word that binds them most closely. In a patriarch’s household kin owed one another loyalty and help, all the more when they lived as strangers among other peoples.
Jesus says, “Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God” (Matthew 5:9). Paul writes, “If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men” (Romans 12:18), and he tells the Corinthians that it would be better to suffer wrong than to go to law against a brother (1 Corinthians 6:7). Proverbs says that the man who is slow to anger calms a quarrel (Proverbs 15:18). Abram is that man here. He takes the first step toward peace, and he is ready to lose something to keep it.
Abram gives Lot the first choice
“Is not the whole land before thee?” Abram asks. “Land” is ʼerets, the same word as in verse 6, and “before thee” is built on pânîym, the face, a word plural in form that is always used as a singular. The land lay open before Lot’s face, and the question expects the answer yes: there is room enough for both if they part.
“Separate thyself, I pray thee, from me” uses pârad, which means to break through, to spread out or to separate. Abram proposes a clear parting, and once again he asks with “I pray thee”. Then he makes his offer: “if thou wilt take the left hand, then I will go to the right; or if thou depart to the right hand, then I will go to the left.” The right hand was the side of strength, honour and preference, and the left could stand for the north, though here the two simply name the ways open to them. Abram turns the offer round so that it covers every choice Lot might make, and he binds himself in advance to take whatever Lot leaves.
Why did Abram let Lot choose first?
Abram trusted God to provide for him, whatever ground was left to him. As the elder he would normally have chosen first, and God had already promised this land to his seed (Genesis 12:7). He set that right aside for the sake of peace with his kinsman, because his security rested on God’s covenant, and the soil came second. God renewed that covenant as soon as Lot had gone. Paul asks the same humility of believers when he tells them to count others better than themselves and to look to the things of others as well as their own (Philippians 2:3–4).
Must a believer always give way in a dispute?
This passage shows a believer giving up his own advantage in a quarrel over pasture, because he valued peace with his brother above the better land. It holds him up as a pattern of taking the first step toward peace and of humble leadership. Where truth or justice is at stake, the same wisdom may call a believer to stand firm. Parting was the right answer here because this quarrel grew out of a land too small for both, and other quarrels may need reconciliation, mediation or forgiveness. In every case the aim is the peace Abram sought, reached in a way that honours God and the other person.
What Lot saw in the plain of Jordan
“And Lot lifted up his eyes” is a common Hebrew way of saying that someone looked deliberately, taking in the whole view. He “beheld all the plain of Jordan”. The word for plain, kikkâr, means a circle, and so a round district, here the flat, fertile land around the Jordan.
It was “well watered every where”. The word mashqeh comes from a root meaning to cause to drink. The plain drew on a steady supply of water, while the highlands waited on the rain, and for a man with great flocks and herds that was the strongest pull of all.
Two comparisons show how rich the plain looked. It was “even as the garden of the LORD”, and the word gan, garden, comes from a verb meaning to fence in or protect, so it is an enclosed and cultivated place. The garden of the LORD is Eden (Genesis 2:8–9). It was also “like the land of Egypt”, the well-watered Nile Delta that Lot had just left. “As thou comest unto Zoar” marks how far the plain reached, toward its southern end.
Lot weighed the land by what he could see, while Abram rested on what God had said. Eden was where man lived with God in obedience, and what drew Lot to the plain was its fruitfulness alone. “There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death” (Proverbs 14:12). John reminds believers that the world passes away, and he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever (1 John 2:15–17).
Why does the verse mention the destruction of Sodom here?
The words “before the LORD destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah” tell the reader at once what lay hidden from Lot. The plain was lovely then and would be ruined later, and verse 13 gives the reason. The verb shâchath means to decay or to ruin, and here it is the ruin the LORD himself brought on those cities. We watch Lot choose already knowing where his choice leads, and so we see how short his sight was. God’s view of a place and its people is the true one, and outward plenty can hide deep wickedness and a coming judgment.
Lot chooses the plain and pitches his tent toward Sodom
“Then Lot chose him all the plain of Jordan.” The verb bâchar means to try, and so to select after weighing what is offered. Lot chose deliberately, he took all of it, and he took it “him”, for himself.
“And Lot journeyed east.” Twice before in Genesis, going east has meant going away from God. The cherubim were placed at the east of the garden when man was driven out of Eden (Genesis 3:24), and Cain went out from the presence of the LORD to dwell in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden (Genesis 4:16). Lot’s move east fits that pattern as a step away from the place of God’s promise, and it brought him nearer to the wicked cities.
“And they separated themselves the one from the other.” This is pârad again, the same verb Abram used in verse 9. The parting he proposed now took place, and from here the two men’s lives run in different directions. Lot’s road would end in his flight from Sodom on the day it was destroyed (Genesis 19:1–26).
Verse 12 sets the two men side by side. “Abram dwelled in the land of Canaan”, the land God had called him to (Genesis 12:1) and promised to give him. The verb is yâshab, the same word used of the Canaanite and the Perizzite in verse 7. Abram lived on in the land of promise among its peoples, trusting God for what he could see and what he could not yet hold. “Lot dwelled in the cities of the plain”, the towns of that well-watered district: Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, Zeboiim and Bela, which is Zoar. They were rich cities and deeply corrupt ones.
What does “pitched his tent toward Sodom” mean?
Lot set up his camp near Sodom, facing the city, close enough to feel its pull while he still lived in a tent. “Pitched his tent” is the verb ʼâhal, formed from the word for tent. Sodom, Çᵉdôm, is a name Strong’s derives from a root meaning to scorch, and explains as a burnt district. By Genesis 19:1 Lot is sitting in the gate of Sodom, living as one of its men. The road from a tent pitched toward the city to a seat in its gate shows how a believer drifts, a little at a time, until he belongs to a place he once only looked at.
Scripture warns about that drift. Proverbs tells us to keep our heart with all diligence (Proverbs 4:23), and Paul warns that bad company corrupts good character (1 Corinthians 15:33). Jesus says, “No man can serve two masters” (Matthew 6:24), and James calls the friendship of the world enmity with God (James 4:4).
The men of Sodom, wicked before the LORD
Verse 13 follows straight after Lot’s choice: “But the men of Sodom were wicked and sinners before the LORD exceedingly.” The plain looked like the garden of the LORD, and its people were evil, so this verse shows Lot’s shrewd-looking choice for the danger it was.
“Wicked” is raʻ, the common word for evil or bad, from a root meaning to break or to be evil. “Sinners” is chaṭṭâʼ, from the verb meaning to miss the mark, and it names a person, “a criminal, or one accounted guilty”. The plural speaks of the whole people. Together the two words describe men who were evil in character and guilty before God. “Before the LORD” means in his sight and under his judgment, and all they did lay open to him. “Exceedingly” is mᵉʼôd, very, greatly, exceedingly, and it marks the great degree of their sin.
God saw it all, he was patient, and his judgment came at last. Later he tells Abraham that the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great and their sin very grievous, and that he will go down and see (Genesis 18:20–21). The whole account of that judgment, and of Lot’s rescue, follows in Genesis 18–19. Proverbs says that he that walketh with wise men shall be wise (Proverbs 13:20), and Lot had chosen his neighbours by their pasture.
What were the sins of Sodom?
Scripture names them in other places. Ezekiel lists Sodom’s pride, fulness of bread and abundance of idleness, her neglect of the poor and needy, and the haughtiness and abomination of her people (Ezekiel 16:49–50). Genesis 19 shows the men of the city trying to force themselves on the visitors in Lot’s house, who were angels. Jude sets Sodom and Gomorrah forth as an example of the vengeance of eternal fire (Jude 1:7). Their sin reached into pride, plenty, idleness, hardness toward the needy and sexual violence.
Christ our peace and our inheritance
Abram’s offer points ahead to Christ. Abram gave up his rights to make peace with his kinsman, and Christ, “being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: but made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant” (Philippians 2:6–7). He made peace between God and those who were his enemies (Romans 5:10), breaking down “the middle wall of partition” between peoples (Ephesians 2:14–16) and reconciling all things to himself by the blood of his cross (Colossians 1:20). In him believers are made brethren: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:28). He has given his people the ministry of reconciliation (2 Corinthians 5:18–20).
The promise Abram trusted when he let Lot choose also finds its answer in Christ. Paul says the seed promised to Abraham is Christ (Galatians 3:16), and all the promises of God in him are yea, and in him Amen (2 Corinthians 1:20). Lot chose the best of the world for himself, and Christ chose the cross, giving himself for our sins to deliver us from this present evil world (Galatians 1:4).
Sodom’s judgment points ahead as well. Christ bore the punishment of our sin, as Isaiah foretold (Isaiah 53:5–6), and those justified by his blood are saved from wrath through him (Romans 5:8–9). He will come again in glory to judge the nations (Matthew 25:31–33), and God sent him so that whoever believes in him should have everlasting life (John 3:16–18). Paul’s call to “come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord” (2 Corinthians 6:17) speaks to the danger Lot walked into. Paul also says that “the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal” (2 Corinthians 4:18), and “we walk by faith, not by sight” (2 Corinthians 5:7).
Faith, sight and the God who keeps his promise
These verses set two blessed men side by side, each facing a land too small for what God had given them. Abram held his rights loosely because he held God’s promise firmly, and he gave away the first choice for the sake of peace with his brother. Lot looked at the plain and took the best of what he could see. As soon as Lot had gone, God spoke to Abram again and renewed his promise of the land and of numerous descendants (Genesis 13:14–18).
So the passage shows us a God who blesses his people richly, and whose gifts call for wisdom and humility in those who hold them. He sees what the eye misses, and the plain that looked like Eden was known to him as the home of men who were sinners before him exceedingly. He keeps faith with the one who gives way for peace. Jesus’ word to us rests on the same truth: “But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you” (Matthew 6:33).
Genesis 13:5
“And Lot also,”
“Also” sets Lot’s wealth beside Abram’s in verse 2, so that two large households now stand side by side.
“which went with Abram,”
Lot had come with Abram out of Egypt and up to Bethel, and his prosperity grew under the blessing God had promised Abram.
“had flocks, and herds, and tents.”
Sheep and goats, cattle, and the tents of the people who tended them, the whole of a herdsman’s wealth in three words.
Genesis 13:6
“And the land was not able to bear them,”
Pasture and water were too little for both households at once.
“that they might dwell together:”
Living side by side had become impossible on that ground.
“for their substance was great,”
The reason lies in the size of their possessions, the fruit of God’s blessing.
“so that they could not dwell together.”
The phrase comes round a second time, and the matter is settled before anyone speaks.
Genesis 13:7 This verse
“And there was a strife”
A real dispute, rîyb, over grazing and water.
“between the herdmen of Abram’s cattle and the herdmen of Lot’s cattle:”
The servants quarrelled first, and their masters’ peace was at stake.
“and the Canaanite and the Perizzite dwelled then in the land.”
“Then” marks the time of the story. The land was already settled by others, who saw how Abram’s household behaved.
Genesis 13:8
“And Abram said unto Lot,”
The elder speaks first, and he speaks to Lot directly.
“Let there be no strife, I pray thee, between me and thee,”
A humble request, and Abram puts himself into it.
“and between my herdmen and thy herdmen;”
He names the quarrel where it started and asks that it end there too.
“for we be brethren.”
Kinship is his reason, a bond that outweighs any pasture.
Genesis 13:9
“Is not the whole land before thee?”
A question that expects yes, since there is room enough to part in peace.
“separate thyself, I pray thee, from me:”
Abram proposes the parting himself, gently.
“if thou wilt take the left hand, then I will go to the right;”
He binds himself in advance to whatever Lot chooses.
“or if thou depart to the right hand, then I will go to the left.”
The offer is turned round so that every choice is covered, the right hand of honour included.
Genesis 13:10
“And Lot lifted up his eyes,”
A deliberate look, taking in the whole view.
“and beheld all the plain of Jordan,”
The kikkâr, the round district along the Jordan.
“that it was well watered every where,”
Water was what a herdsman with great flocks needed most.
“before the LORD destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah,”
A word from the narrator, looking ahead: the beauty Lot saw would end in ruin.
“even as the garden of the LORD, like the land of Egypt,”
Two pictures of rich, watered land, Eden and the Nile.
“as thou comest unto Zoar.”
This marks how far the plain reached.
Genesis 13:11
“Then Lot chose him all the plain of Jordan;”
He takes the whole of it, and he takes it for himself.
“and Lot journeyed east:”
The direction of Eden’s gate and of Cain’s going out from the presence of the LORD.
“and they separated themselves the one from the other.”
Abram’s proposal is carried out, and their paths divide from here.
Genesis 13:12
“Abram dwelled in the land of Canaan,”
The land of the promise, still held by its peoples.
“and Lot dwelled in the cities of the plain,”
Lot’s life moves toward the towns.
“and pitched his tent toward Sodom.”
Still a tent-dweller, he faces the city he would later live in.
Genesis 13:13
“But the men of Sodom”
“But” sets the people against the lovely land of verse 10.
“were wicked and sinners”
Evil men, and men accounted guilty.
“before the LORD exceedingly.”
In God’s own sight, and to a very great degree.
Last revised