See on the biblical-era map


Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Kings 11:26–40. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
We have here the first mention of that infamous name Jeroboam the son of Nebat, that made Israel to sin; he is here brought upon the stage as an adversary to Solomon, whom God had expressly told (Kg1 11:11) that he would give the greatest part of his kingdom to his servant, and Jeroboam was the man. We have here an account,
I.Of his extraction, Kg1 11:26.
He was of the tribe of Ephraim, he next in honour to Judah. His mother was a widow, to whom Providence had made up the loss of a husband in a son that was active and ingenious, and (we may suppose) a great support and comfort to her.
II.Of his elevation.
It was Solomon's wisdom, when he had work to do, to employ proper persons in it. He observed Jeroboam to be a very industrious young man, one that minded his business, took a pleasure in it, and did it with all his might, and therefore he gradually advanced him, till at length he made him receiver-general for the two tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh, or perhaps put him into an office equivalent to that of lord-lieutenant of those two counties, for he was ruler of the burden, or tribute, that is, either of the taxes or of the militia of the house of Joseph. Note, Industry is the way to preferment. Seest thou a man diligent in his business, that will take care and pains, and go through with it? he shall stand before kings, and not always be on the level with mean men. Observe a difference between David, and both his predecessor and his successor: when Saul saw a valiant man he took him to himself (Sa1 14:52); when Solomon saw an industrious man he preferred him; but David's eyes were upon the faithful in the land, that they might dwell with him: if he saw a godly man, he preferred him, for he was a man after God's own heart, whose countenance beholds the upright.
III.Of his designation to the government of the ten tribes after the death of Solomon.
Some think he was himself plotting against Solomon, and contriving to rise to the throne, that he was turbulent and aspiring. The Jews say that when he was employed by Solomon in building Millo he took opportunities of reflecting upon Solomon as oppressive to his people, and suggesting that which would alienate them from his government. It is not indeed probable that he should say much to that purport, for Solomon would have got notice of it, and it would have hindered his preferment; but it is plainly intimated that he had it in his thoughts, for the prophet tells him (Kg1 11:37), Thou shalt reign according to all that thy soul desireth. But this was the cause, or rather this was the story, of the lifting up of his hand against the king: Solomon made him ruler over the tribes of Joseph, and, as he was going to take possession of his government, he was told by a prophet in God's name that he should be king, which emboldened him to aim high, and in some instances to oppose the king and give him vexation.
1.The prophet by whom this message was sent was Ahijah of Shiloh; we shall read of him again, Kg1 14:2. It seems, Shiloh was not so perfectly forsaken and forgotten of God but that, in remembrance of the former days, it was blessed with a prophet. He delivered his message to Jeroboam in the way, his servants being probably ordered to retire, as in a like case (Sa1 9:27), when Samuel delivered his message to Saul. God's word was not the less sacred and sure for being delivered to him thus obscurely, under a hedge it may be.
2.The sign by which it was represented to him was the rending of a garment into twelve pieces, and giving him ten, Kg1 11:30, Kg1 11:31. It is not certain whether the garment was Jeroboam's, as is commonly taken for granted, or Ahijah's, which is more probable: He (that is, the prophet) had clad himself with a new garment, on purpose that he might with it give him a sign. The rending of the kingdom from Saul was signified by the rending of Samuel's mantle, not Saul's, Sa1 15:27, Sa1 15:28. And it was more significant to give Jeroboam ten pieces of that which was not his own before than of that which was. The prophets, both true and false, used such signs, even in the New Testament, as Agabus, Act 21:10, Act 21:11.
3.The message itself, which is very particular,
(1.)He assures him that he shall be king over ten of the twelve tribes of Israel, Kg1 11:31. The meanness of his extraction and employment shall be no hindrance to his advancement, when the God of Israel says (by whom kings reign), I will give ten tribes unto thee.
(2.)He tells him the reason; not for his good character or deserts, but for the chastising of Solomon's apostasy: "Because he, and his family, and many of his people with him, have forsaken me, and worshipped other gods," Kg1 11:33. It was because they had done ill, not because he was likely to do much better. Thus Israel must know that it is not for their righteousness that they are made masters of Canaan, but for the wickedness of the Canaanites, Deu 9:4. Jeroboam did not deserve so good a post, but Israel deserved so bad a prince. In telling him that the reason why he rent the kingdom from the house of Solomon was because they had forsaken God, he warns him to take heed of sinning away his preferment in like manner.
(3.)He limits his expectations to the ten tribes only, and to them in reversion after the death of Solomon, lest he should aim at the whole and give immediate disturbance to Solomon's government. He is here told,
[1.]That two tribes (called here one tribe, because little Benjamin was in a manner lost in the thousands of Judah) should remain sure to the house of David, and he must never make any attempt upon them: He shall have one tribe (Kg1 11:32), and again (Kg1 11:36), That David may have a lamp, that is, a shining name and memory (Psa 132:17), and his family, as a royal family, may not be extinct. He must not think that David was rejected, as Saul was. No, God would not take his loving-kindness from him, as he did from Saul. The house of David must be supported and kept in reputation, for all this, because out of it the Messiah must arise. Destroy it not, for that blessing is in it.
[2.]That Solomon must keep possession during his life, Kg1 11:34, Kg1 11:35. Jeroboam therefore must not offer to dethrone him, but wait with patience till his day shall come to fall. Solomon shall be prince, all the days of his life, not for his own sake (he had forfeited his crown to the justice of God), but for David my servant's sake, because he kept my commandments. Children that do not tread in their parents' steps yet often fare the better in this world for their good parents' piety.
(4.)He gives him to understand that he will be upon his good behaviour. The grant of the crown must run quamdiu se bene gesserit - during good behaviour. "If thou wilt do what is right in my sight, I will build thee a sure house, and not otherwise" (Kg1 11:38), intimating that, if he forsook God, even his advancement to the throne would in time lay his family in the dust; whereas the seed of David, though afflicted, should not be afflicted for ever (Kg1 11:39), but should flourish again, as it did in many of the illustrious kings of Judah, who reigned in glory when Jeroboam's family was extirpated.
IV.Jeroboam's flight into Egypt, Kg1 11:40.
In some way or other Solomon came to know of all this, probably from Jeroboam's own talk of it; he could not conceal it as Saul did, nor keep his own counsel; if he had, he might have staid in his country, and been preparing there for his future advancement; but letting it be known,
1.Solomon foolishly sought to kill his successor. Had not he taught others that, whatever devices are in men's hearts, the counsel of the Lord shall stand? And yet does he himself think to defeat that counsel?
2.Jeroboam prudently withdrew into Egypt. Though God's promise would have secured him any where, yet he would use means for his own preservation, and was content to live in exile and obscurity for a while, being sure of a kingdom at last. And shall not we be so, who have a better kingdom in reserve?
Historical interpretation
Six Centuries of Reception
2 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
In the Gospel there is a proof of this mystery of unity, this inseparable bond of harmony, when the coat of the Lord Jesus Christ is not cut or rent at all. The garment is received whole and the coat taken into possession unspoiled and undivided by those who cast lots for Christ’s garment, asking who should put on Christ. Holy Scripture says of this, “But for the coat, because it was not sewn but woven from the top throughout, they said to each other: Let us not rend it but casts lots for it, whose it shall be.” He showed a unity that came from the top, that is, from heaven and the Father, a unity that could by no means be rent by one who received and possessed it. Its wholeness and unity remained solid and unbreakable forever. He who rends and divides the church cannot possess the garment of Christ. In contrast, when at Solomon’s death his kingdom and people were being rent, the prophet Ahijah, meeting King Jeroboam in the field, rent his garment into twelve pieces, saying, “Take for yourself ten pieces, for thus says the Lord: Behold, I rend the kingdom out of the hand of Solomon and will give ten scepters to you; but he shall have two scepters for my servant David’s sake, and for Jerusalem’s sake, the city that I have chosen, to put my name there.” When the twelve tribes of Israel were being rent, the prophet Ahijah rent his garment. But since Christ’s people cannot be rent, his coat, woven throughout as a single whole, was not rent by its owners. Undivided, conjoined, coherent, it proves the unbroken harmony of our people who have put on Christ. By the type and symbol of his garment he has manifested the unity of the church.
Here God’s mercy is absolutely evident. Even though he knew how wicked Jeroboam was, [God] appoints him king in order to show that, as far as it depends on him, his gifts are never denied but showered on everyone. Humans themselves, however, refuse them deliberately.
Continue studying 1 Kings 11:32 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
1 Kings 11:32 encapsulates a pivotal moment in Israel's history, revealing God's profound tension between righteous judgment and unwavering covenant faithfulness. Following King Solomon's grievous apostasy through widespread idolatry and foreign alliances, God declares the tearing away of the kingdom from his son. Yet, this verse introduces a significant tempering of that judgment: one tribe, primarily Judah, with Jerusalem as its capital, will remain under the Davidic dynasty. This preservation is explicitly stated to be "for my servant David's sake" and "for Jerusalem's sake," highlighting God's steadfast commitment to His covenant promises and His sovereignly chosen city, even in the face of profound human failure.
CONTEXT
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
As seen in "my servant David," this term (H5650) signifies more than just a general follower; it denotes a special, intimate relationship of loyal devotion and divine appointment. "My servant David" is a title of honor and covenant privilege, emphasizing David's unique status before God, despite his own failures. It is on the basis of this established covenant relationship that God extends mercy to David's lineage, even when his descendants falter. This highlights God's faithfulness to His chosen instruments.
The name (H1732) itself, meaning "loving," points to the individual with whom God established an unconditional covenant. The preservation of one tribe is explicitly "for David's sake," underscoring that God's action is rooted in His commitment to the Davidic covenant, rather than any merit or lack thereof in Solomon or his son. This emphasizes the enduring nature of God's promises to His chosen one, ensuring the continuity of the lineage through which the Messiah would come.
This verb (H977), meaning "to try, select," or "elect," is used in reference to Jerusalem ("the city which I have chosen"). Its use highlights God's sovereign initiative and deliberate selection of Jerusalem. It implies a special, unique relationship and purpose for Jerusalem, setting it apart from all other cities. This divine election is not based on the city's inherent qualities but on God's will and His plan for His dwelling place and the center of His worship, which is crucial for the unfolding of His redemptive history.
Verse Breakdown
"(But he shall have one tribe"
This clause refers to Solomon's son, Rehoboam, and reveals the extent of God's mercy amidst judgment. While the majority of the kingdom (ten tribes) will be torn away, a significant portion—"one tribe"—will remain under the Davidic dynasty. This "one tribe" primarily refers to Judah, though the tribe of Benjamin and parts of the Levitical priesthood would also align with the Southern Kingdom. This preservation is vital for the continuity of the Davidic line and the future of God's redemptive plan.
"for my servant David's sake"
This phrase provides the primary theological justification for the tempered judgment. God's faithfulness to His unconditional covenant with David (2 Samuel 7) is the overriding factor. Despite Solomon's profound disobedience and apostasy, God's word to David remains inviolable and secure. This underscores that God's promises are grounded in His unchanging character, not in human performance or merit.
"and for Jerusalem's sake"
This is the second explicit reason for the preservation. Jerusalem was not merely a political capital; it was the city God had specifically chosen as the place for His name to dwell, where the Temple was built, and where His presence was uniquely manifested among His people. Its preservation ensures the continued existence of the divinely ordained center of worship and the future unfolding of God's redemptive plan, particularly the Messianic hope.
"the city which I have chosen out of all the tribes of Israel:)"
This final clause reiterates and emphasizes Jerusalem's unique status and divine election. God's choice of Jerusalem was an act of sovereign will, distinguishing it from all other places within Israel. This election signifies its pivotal and enduring role in God's redemptive history, serving as the spiritual and geographical anchor for the Davidic covenant and the future Messianic hope.
Literary Devices
The verse employs several significant literary devices that enrich its meaning and impact. Contrast is prominently featured, juxtaposing the impending severe judgment of kingdom division with the gracious preservation of one tribe. This highlights the profound tension between God's righteous justice in response to sin and His unwavering mercy rooted in His covenant promises. The deliberate repetition of the phrase "for...sake" ("for my servant David's sake, and for Jerusalem's sake") functions as an emphatic anaphora, underscoring the two foundational and non-negotiable reasons for God's tempered judgment. This rhetorical device reveals God's deep commitment to His prior covenants and His chosen entities. The entire verse is delivered as part of a divine oracle or prophetic pronouncement, emphasizing its origin directly from God and thus its absolute authority, certainty, and divine purpose. Furthermore, the language is steeped in covenantal themes, particularly highlighting the unconditional nature of the Davidic covenant, thereby demonstrating God's steadfastness even when human partners fail to uphold their end.
Theological and Thematic Connections
This verse is a powerful testament to the enduring nature of God's covenant faithfulness amidst human failure. It reveals a God who, though just in His judgment of sin, is also rich in mercy, tempering His wrath with grace for the sake of His prior commitments. The preservation of the Davidic line and Jerusalem is not a mere political maneuver but a crucial step in the unfolding drama of salvation history, ensuring the lineage through which the Messiah would come. It teaches us that while our disobedience has real and painful consequences, God's ultimate purposes and promises are secure, anchored in His unchanging character rather than our fleeting obedience. This divine steadfastness provides profound assurance that God will bring His redemptive plan to its glorious completion, regardless of human shortcomings.
Reflection and Application
1 Kings 11:32 offers both profound comfort and a sobering warning for believers today. It reminds us that while our sin carries real consequences and can disrupt our lives and relationships, God's ultimate purposes for His people and His world are unshakeable. His faithfulness is not dependent on our perfection but on His own character and His eternal covenant promises. This truth should inspire both humility and hope: humility, knowing that our disobedience grieves God and has real repercussions for ourselves and those around us, and hope, trusting that even in our darkest moments of failure, God remains true to His word. We are called to live in faithful obedience, striving to honor God in all things, but when we stumble, we find solace in the God who, for the sake of His own name and His Son, Jesus Christ, remains faithful to His redemptive plan. This verse encourages us to look beyond immediate circumstances to God's overarching faithfulness, which guarantees the ultimate triumph of His kingdom and His purposes for us.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was only one tribe preserved for Solomon's son, and why was it Judah?
The preservation of "one tribe" (primarily Judah, along with Benjamin and some Levites) for Solomon's son, Rehoboam, was a direct act of divine grace and faithfulness, tempering the judgment pronounced against Solomon. God had made an unconditional promise to David that his house and kingdom would endure forever (2 Samuel 7:16). Preserving Judah ensured the continuity of the Davidic dynasty, through which the Messiah would eventually come. It was not a reward for Solomon's son, but a demonstration of God's unwavering commitment to His covenant with David and His chosen city, Jerusalem, which was located within Judah's territory. This act ensured that the lineage of the promised King would remain intact, fulfilling God's long-term redemptive plan.
What does "for my servant David's sake" mean if David himself sinned?
The phrase "for my servant David's sake" does not imply that David was sinless or that God's faithfulness was contingent on David's perfect obedience. David, too, committed grievous sins (e.g., 2 Samuel 11). Rather, it refers to God's unconditional covenant with David, which was an act of divine grace and sovereign election (2 Samuel 7:8-16). God chose David and established an eternal dynasty through him, not because of David's merit, but because of God's own character and purpose. Thus, the preservation of the Davidic line is a testament to God's faithfulness to His own word and His unchangeable nature, even when His human partners fail. It underscores that God's promises are ultimately secured by His character, not by human performance.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
1 Kings 11:32 finds its ultimate and glorious fulfillment in Jesus Christ, the true Son of David and the King whose kingdom will have no end. The preservation of "one tribe" and the Davidic line, "for my servant David's sake," directly points to the coming of the Messiah. Jesus, born of the tribe of Judah (Matthew 1:1), is the promised heir to David's throne, fulfilling the eternal covenant God made with David (Luke 1:32-33). While Solomon's kingdom was tragically divided due to his sin, Jesus establishes a spiritual kingdom that is indivisible, eternal, and universal, extending His dominion over all peoples, nations, and languages (Daniel 7:14). The "Jerusalem's sake" aspect also finds its culmination in Christ, who is the foundation of the New Jerusalem, the heavenly city where God dwells perfectly and eternally with His redeemed people (Revelation 21:2-3). Thus, this Old Testament passage, steeped in judgment and grace, serves as a vital prophetic thread, demonstrating God's unwavering commitment to His redemptive plan, which culminates in the person and work of Jesus Christ, the faithful King who secures an eternal kingdom for all who believe.