Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Who did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Who G3739 did G4160 no G3756 sin G266, neither G3761 was guile G1388 found G2147 in G1722 his G846 mouth G4750:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
“He committed no sin,
nor was any deceit found on his lips.”
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
“He committed no sin, and no deceit was found in His mouth.”
Ask
American Standard Version
who did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth:
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
who did not sin, “neither was deceit found in his mouth.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Who did no sinne, neither was there guile found in his mouth.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
who did not commit sin, nor was guile found in his mouth,
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Peter 2:22 profoundly declares the impeccable character of Jesus Christ, asserting His absolute sinlessness and complete freedom from deceit, particularly in the context of His unjust suffering. This verse serves as a foundational statement of Christ's moral perfection, which undergirds His role as the spotless sacrifice for humanity, while simultaneously presenting Him as the supreme example for believers enduring undeserved hardship.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is embedded within Peter's broader exhortation to believers regarding their conduct, especially when facing suffering. Following a call to submit to human authorities (1 Peter 2:13-17) and an instruction for household servants to submit to their masters, even harsh ones (1 Peter 2:18), Peter introduces Christ as the ultimate paradigm. Verses 1 Peter 2:19-21 specifically commend enduring suffering for righteousness' sake, stating that Christians are called to follow in Christ's steps. 1 Peter 2:22 and the subsequent verses (up to 1 Peter 2:25) then elaborate on the nature of Christ's suffering, emphasizing His innocence and redemptive purpose, thereby providing both the motivation and the model for believers.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Peter is addressing Christians dispersed throughout Asia Minor (modern-day Turkey), who were facing various forms of social ostracization, slander, and potentially official persecution. The Roman Empire, while generally tolerant of diverse religions, viewed Christianity with suspicion due to its exclusive claims and refusal to participate in emperor worship. This often led to Christians being falsely accused and suffering unjustly. Within this context, Peter's letter provides pastoral encouragement, urging steadfastness, good conduct, and reliance on God's justice. The allusion to Isaiah 53:9 is significant, as it taps into a deeply resonant Old Testament prophecy concerning a suffering, righteous servant, a concept that would have been familiar to Jewish Christians and understood by Gentile converts through apostolic teaching.
  • Key Themes: The overarching theme in 1 Peter 2 is the call to holy living and submission in the face of an ungodly world, culminating in the example of Christ's suffering. This verse contributes to several key themes: Christ's Sinlessness, which is foundational to His atoning work and His perfect example; Suffering for Righteousness' Sake, as Christ's undeserved suffering becomes the pattern for believers; and Divine Justice, as believers are encouraged to entrust themselves to God, "who judges righteously" (1 Peter 2:23). The emphasis on Christ's truthful speech also reinforces the theme of Integrity and Witness in a hostile environment, where believers' words and actions are under scrutiny.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • sin (Greek, hamartía', G266): Meaning a missing of the mark or transgression. In this context, it denotes a complete absence of moral failure, rebellion against God's law, or any act that falls short of divine perfection. Christ's life was utterly devoid of such transgression.
  • did (Greek, poiéō', G4160): Meaning "to make or do." The use of this verb with the negative "no" (G3756, ou) emphasizes the active and complete absence of sin in Christ's life. It's not merely that sin wasn't attributed to Him, but that He actively performed no sinful deed.
  • guile (Greek, dólos', G1388): Referring to a trick, bait, wile, craft, deceit, or subtilty. This word signifies intentional deception, cunning, or treachery. Its absence in Christ's mouth highlights His absolute integrity and truthfulness in all His communication, even under duress.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Who did no sin,": This clause unequivocally asserts the perfect moral purity of Jesus Christ. It declares that His life was entirely free from any transgression against God's law or any moral failing. This sinlessness is not merely a passive state but an active demonstration, meaning He never committed an act of sin. This truth is foundational to His role as the spotless Lamb of God, capable of bearing the sins of humanity.
  • "neither was guile found in his mouth:": This second clause expands on Christ's perfection, focusing specifically on His speech. It means that no deceit, trickery, dishonesty, or malicious intent was ever discovered in anything He said. His words were always pure, truthful, and without hidden motives, even when facing His accusers and enduring immense suffering. This emphasizes His complete integrity in both action and word.

Literary Devices

Peter employs several literary devices to powerfully convey Christ's impeccable character. The most prominent is Allusion, as the verse directly echoes Isaiah 53:9, which describes the Suffering Servant: "he had done no violence, neither was any deceit in his mouth." By applying this prophecy to Jesus, Peter underscores Christ's fulfillment of Old Testament messianic expectations and highlights His innocence in suffering. Furthermore, Peter uses Parallelism through the two negative clauses ("did no sin" and "neither was guile found in his mouth"), which function as a complementary pair, reinforcing the comprehensive nature of Christ's perfection. The first clause speaks to His actions, and the second to His words, together painting a complete picture of moral integrity. There is also an element of Synecdoche or Metonymy in the phrase "in his mouth," where "mouth" (stóma) stands for all of Christ's speech and communication, emphasizing the purity of His every utterance.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The profound declaration of Christ's sinlessness and truthfulness in 1 Peter 2:22 is a cornerstone of Christian theology. His perfect moral purity is not merely an admirable quality but an essential prerequisite for His atoning work. Only a sinless sacrifice could effectively bear the sins of a fallen humanity, providing a perfect propitiation that satisfies divine justice. This verse connects Christ's blameless life directly to His redemptive suffering, presenting Him as the ultimate example for believers called to endure hardship righteously. It underscores the truth that His suffering was vicarious, for our sins, not for His own.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The profound truth of Christ's sinless life and truthful speech, even in the crucible of unjust suffering, offers believers both immense comfort and a compelling challenge. We find comfort in knowing that our salvation rests upon the perfect, unblemished sacrifice of one who was truly without fault, making His atonement fully efficacious. This perfect example also challenges us to cultivate integrity in our own lives, particularly when facing adversity or false accusations. In a world often characterized by deceit and moral compromise, Christ's unwavering purity in both action and word calls us to strive for a similar integrity. When we suffer unjustly, we are not to retaliate with sin or deceit, but to entrust ourselves to God, following Christ's pattern of patient endurance and truthfulness. This verse reminds us that our witness to the world is profoundly shaped by how we respond to suffering, reflecting the character of the One who endured all for us.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does Christ's absolute sinlessness and truthfulness provide a foundation for your personal faith and hope?
  • In what specific areas of your life are you challenged to emulate Christ's integrity, especially when facing difficult circumstances or unfair treatment?
  • How does knowing that Christ "did no sin" impact your understanding of His suffering and its redemptive power?

FAQ

Why is Christ's sinlessness so important for Christian theology?

Answer: Christ's sinlessness is absolutely crucial because it is the foundational prerequisite for His atoning work. As the perfect, unblemished "Lamb of God" (John 1:29), He alone was qualified to bear the sin of the world. If Jesus had sinned, even once, He would have needed a savior Himself and would have been subject to the penalty of sin, thus rendering His sacrifice insufficient to redeem humanity. His perfect obedience and moral purity mean that His death was not for His own transgressions but entirely for ours, making Him the spotless offering that satisfies God's righteous demands (Hebrews 9:14).

How does "guile found in his mouth" relate to Christ's character?

Answer: The phrase "neither was guile found in his mouth" emphasizes Christ's complete and utter truthfulness, integrity, and lack of deceit in all His communication. "Guile" (Greek: dólos) refers to trickery, cunning, or malicious deception. This means that Jesus never spoke with hidden motives, never manipulated others with His words, and never resorted to dishonesty, even when facing intense pressure, false accusations, or the threat of death. His words were always pure, straightforward, and reflective of divine truth. This aspect of His character serves as a powerful example for believers to speak truthfully and without deceit, especially when under duress, reflecting the character of God who cannot lie (Titus 1:2).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

1 Peter 2:22 finds its profound Christ-centered fulfillment in presenting Jesus as the ultimate, spotless sacrifice who perfectly embodies the prophetic description of the Suffering Servant from Isaiah 53. His absolute sinlessness—"Who did no sin"—is not merely a moral attribute but the very qualification that enables Him to be the efficacious atonement for humanity's transgressions. He is the "Lamb without blemish or spot" (1 Peter 1:19), whose perfect life allows Him to "bear our sins in his own body on the tree" (1 Peter 2:24). Furthermore, the declaration that "neither was guile found in his mouth" underscores His complete integrity, confirming Him as the faithful and true witness (Revelation 3:14), whose words are pure truth, even in the face of false accusation and crucifixion. His suffering was not a consequence of His own sin, but a voluntary act of divine love, fulfilling God's redemptive plan to reconcile a sinful world to Himself through the perfect, blameless life and sacrificial death of His Son (2 Corinthians 5:21).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Peter 2 verses 13–25

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

The general rule of a Christian conversation is this, it must be honest, which it cannot be if there be not a conscientious discharge of all relative duties. The apostle here particularly treats of these distinctly.

I. The case of subjects. Christians were not only reputed innovators in religion, but disturbers of the state; it was highly necessary, therefore, that the apostle should settle the rules and measures of obedience to the civil magistrate, which he does here, where,

1.The duty required is submission, which comprises loyalty and reverence to their persons, obedience to their just laws and commands, and subjection to legal penalties.

2.The persons or objects to whom this submission is due are described, (1.) More generally: Every ordinance of man. Magistracy is certainly of divine right; but the particular form of government, the power of the magistrate, and the persons who are to execute this power, are of human institution, and are governed by the laws and constitutions of each particular country; and this is a general rule, binding in all nations, let the established form of be what it will. (2.) Particularly: To the king, as supreme, first in dignity and most eminent in degree; the king is a legal person, not a tyrant: or unto governors, deputies, proconsuls, rulers of provinces, who are sent by him, that is, commissioned by him to govern.

3.The reasons to enforce this duty are,

(1.)For the Lord's sake, who had ordained magistracy for the good of mankind, who has required obedience and submission (Rom 13:1-14), and whose honour is concerned in the dutiful behavior of subjects to their sovereigns.

(2.)From the end and use of the magistrate's office, which are, to punish evil-doers, and to praise and encourage all those that do well. They were appointed for the good of societies; and, where this end is not pursued, the fault is not in their institution but their practice. [1.] True religion is the best support of civil government; it requires submission for the Lord's sake, and for conscience' sake. [2.] All the punishments, and all the magistrates in the world, cannot hinder but there will be evil-doers in it. [3.] The best way the magistrate can take to discharge his own duty, and to amend the world, is to punish well and reward well.

(3.)Another reason why Christians should submit to the evil magistrate is because it is the will of God, and consequently their duty; and because it is the way to put to silence the malicious slanders of ignorant and foolish men, Pe1 2:15. Learn, [1.] The will of God is, to a good man, the strongest reason for any duty. [2.] Obedience to magistrates is a considerable branch of a Christian's duty: So is the will of God. [3.] A Christian must endeavour, in all relations, to behave himself so as to put to silence the unreasonable reproaches of the most ignorant and foolish men. [4.] Those who speak against religion and religious people are ignorant and foolish.

(4.)He reminds them of the spiritual nature of Christian liberty. The Jews, from Deu 17:15, concluded that they were bound to obey no sovereign but one taken from their own brethren; and the converted Jews thought they were free from subjection by their relation to Christ. To prevent their mistakes, the apostle tells the Christians that they were free, but from what? Not from duty or obedience to God's law, which requires subjection to the civil magistrate. They were free spiritually from the bondage of sin and Satan, and the ceremonial law; but they must not make their Christian liberty a cloak or covering for any wickedness, or for the neglect of any duty towards God or towards their superiors, but must still remember they were the servants of God. Learn, [1.] All the servants of Christ are free men (Joh 8:36); they are free from Satans' dominion, the law's condemnation, the wrath of God, the uneasiness of duty, and the terrors of death. [2.] The servants of Jesus Christ ought to be very careful not to abuse their Christian liberty; they must not make it a cover or cloak for any wickedness against God or disobedience to superiors.

4.The apostle concludes his discourse concerning the duty of subjects with four admirable precepts: - (1.) Honour all men. A due respect is to be given to all men; the poor are not to be despised (Pro 17:5); the wicked must be honoured, not for their wickedness, but for any other qualities, such as wit, prudence, courage, eminency of employment, or the hoary head. Abraham, Jacob, Samuel, the prophets, and the apostles, never scrupled to give due honour to bad men. (2.) Love the brotherhood. All Christians are a fraternity, united to Christ the head, alike disposed and qualified, nearly related in the same interest, having communion one with another, and going to the same home; they should therefore love one another with an especial affection. (3.) Fear God with the highest reverence, duty, and submission; if this be wanting, none of the other three duties can be performed as they ought. (4.) Honour the king with that highest honour that is peculiarly due to him above other men.

II. The case of servants wanted an apostolical determination as well as that of subjects, for they imagined that their Christian liberty set them free from their unbelieving and cruel masters; to this the apostle answers, Servants, be subject, Pe1 2:18. By servants he means those who were strictly such, whether hired, or bought with money, or taken in the wars, or born in the house, or those who served by contract for a limited time, as apprentices. Observe,

1.He orders them to be subject, to do their business faithfully and honestly, to conduct themselves, as inferiors ought, with reverence and affection, and to submit patiently to hardships and inconveniences. This subjection they owe to their masters, who have a right to their service; and that not only to the good and gentle, such as use them well and abate somewhat of their right, but even to the crooked and perverse, who are scarcely to be pleased at all. Learn, (1.) Servants ought to behave themselves to their masters with submission, and fear of displeasing them. (2.) The sinful misconduct of one relation does not justify the sinful behaviour of the other; the servant is bound to do his duty, though the master be sinfully froward and perverse. (3.) Good people are meek and gentle to their servants and inferiors. Our holy apostle shows his love and concern for the souls of poor servants, as well as for higher people. Herein he ought to be imitated by all inferior ministers, who should distinctly apply their counsels to the lower, the meaner, the younger, and the poorer sort of their hearers, as well as others.

2.Having charged them to be subject, he condescends to reason with them about it.

(1.)If they were patient under their hardships, while they suffered unjustly, and continued doing their duty to their unbelieving and untoward masters, this would e acceptable to God, and he would reward all that they suffered for conscience towards him; but to be patient when they were justly chastised would deserve no commendation at all; it is only doing well, and suffering patiently for that, which is acceptable with God, Pe1 2:19, Pe1 2:20. Learn, [1.] There is no condition so mean but a man may live conscientiously in it, and glorify God in it; the meanest servant may do so. [2.] The most conscientious persons are very often the greatest sufferers. For conscience towards God, they suffer wrongfully; they do well, and suffer for it; but sufferers of this sort are praiseworthy, they do honour to God and to religion, and they are accepted of him; and this is their highest support and satisfaction. [3.] Deserved sufferings must be endured with patience: If you are buffeted for your faults, you must take it patiently. Sufferings in this world are not always pledges of our future happiness; if children or servants be rude and undutiful, and suffer for it, this will neither be acceptable with God nor procure the praise of men.

(2.)More reasons are given to encourage Christian servants to patience under unjust sufferings, Pe1 2:21. [1.] From their Christian calling and profession: Hereunto were you called. [2.] From the example of Christ, who suffered for us, and so became our example, that we should follow his steps, whence learn, First, Good Christians are a sort of people called to be sufferers, and therefore they must expect it; by the terms of Christianity they are bound to deny themselves, and take up the cross; they are called by the commands of Christ, by the dispensations of Providence, and by the preparations of divine grace; and, by the practice of Jesus Christ, they are bound to suffer when thus called to it. Secondly, Jesus Christ suffered for you, or for us; it was not the Father that suffered, but he whom the Father sanctified, and sent into the world, for that end; it was both the body and soul of Christ that suffered, and he suffered for us, in our stead and for our good, Pe1 2:24. Thirdly, The sufferings of Christ should quiet us under the most unjust and cruel sufferings we meet with in the world. He suffered voluntarily, not for himself, but for us, with the utmost readiness, with perfect patience, from all quarters, and all this though he was God - man; shall not we sinners, who deserve the worst, submit to the light afflictions of this life, which work for us unspeakable advantages afterwards?

3.The example of Christ's subjection and patience is here explained and amplified: Christ suffered, (1.) Wrongfully, and without cause; for he did no sin, Pe1 2:22. He had done no violence, no injustice or wrong to any one - he wrought no iniquity of any sort whatever; neither was guile found in his mouth (Isa 53:9), his words, as well as his actions, were all sincere, just, and right. (2.) Patiently: When he was reviled, he reviled not again (Pe1 2:23); when they blasphemed him, mocked him, called him foul names, he was dumb, and opened not his mouth; when they went further, to real injuries, beating, buffeting, and crowning him with thorns, he threatened not; but committed both himself and his cause to God that judgeth righteously, who would in time clear his innocency, and avenge him on his enemies. Learn, [1.] Our Blessed Redeemer was perfectly holy, and so free from sin that no temptation, no provocation whatsoever, could extort from him so much as the least sinful or indecent word. [2.] Provocations to sin can never justify the commission of it. The rudeness, cruelty, and injustice of enemies, will not justify Christians in reviling and revenge; the reasons for sin can never be so great, but we have always stronger reasons to avoid it. [3.] The judgment of God will determine justly upon every man and every cause; and thither we ought, with patience and resignation, to refer ourselves.

4.Lest any should think, from what is said, Pe1 2:21-23, that Christ's death was designed merely for an example of patience under sufferings, the apostle here adds a more glorious design and effect of it: Who his own self, etc., where note, (1.) The person suffering - Jesus Christ: His own self - in his own body. The expression his own self is emphatic, and necessary to show that he verified all the ancient prophecies, to distinguish him from the Levitical priests (who offered the blood of others, but he by himself purged our sins, Heb 1:3), and to exclude all others from participation with him in the work of man's redemption: it is added, in his body; not but that he suffered in his soul (Mat 26:38), but the sufferings of the soul were inward and concealed, when those of the body were visible and more obvious to the consideration of these suffering servants, for whose sake this example is produced. (2.) The sufferings he underwent were stripes, wounds, and death, the death of the cross - servile and ignominious punishments! (3.) The reason of his sufferings: He bore our sins, which teaches, [1.] That Christ, in his sufferings, stood charged with our sins, as one who had undertaken to put them away by the sacrifice of himself, Isa 53:6. [2.] That he bore the punishment of them, and thereby satisfied divine justice. [3.] That hereby he takes away our sins, and removes them away from us; as the scape-goat did typically bear the sins of the people on his head, and then carried them quite away, (Lev 16:21, Lev 16:22), so the Lamb of God does first bear our sins in his own body, and thereby take away the sins of the world, Joh 1:29. (4.) The fruits of Christ's sufferings are, [1.] Our sanctification, consisting of the death, the mortification of sin, and a new holy life of righteousness, for both which we have an example, and powerful motives and abilities also, from the death and resurrection of Christ. [2.] Our justification. Christ was bruised and crucified as an expiatory sacrifice, and by his stripes we are healed. Learn, First, Jesus Christ bore the sins of all his people, and expiated them by his death upon the cross. Secondly, No man can depend safely upon Christ, as having borne his sin and expiated his guilt, till he dies unto sin and lives unto righteousness.

5.The apostle concludes his advice to Christian servants, by putting them in mind of the difference between their former and present condition, Pe1 2:25. They were as sheep going astray, which represents, (1.) Man's sin: he goes astray; it is his own act, he is not driven, but does voluntary go astray. (2.) His misery: he goes astray from the pasture, from the shepherd, and from the flock, and so exposes himself to innumerable dangers. (3.) Here is the recovery of these by conversion: But are now returned. The word is passive, and shows that the return of a sinner is the effect of divine grace. This return is from all their errors and wanderings, to Christ, who is the true careful shepherd, that loves his sheep, and laid down his life for them, who is the most vigilant pastor, and bishop, or overseer of souls. Learn, [1.] Sinners, before their conversion, are always going astray; their life is a continued error. [2.] Jesus Christ is the supreme shepherd and bishop of souls, who is always resident with his flock, and watchful over them. [3.] Those that expect the love and care of this universal pastor must return to him, must die unto sin, and live unto righteousness.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 13–25. Public domain.
Copy as
Polycarp of SmyrnaAD 155
Epistle to the Philippians 8
Let us then continually persevere in our hope, and the earnest of our righteousness, which is Jesus Christ, "who bore our sins in His own body on the tree," "who did no sin, neither was guile found in His mouth," but endured all things for us, that we might live in Him. Let us then be imitators of His patience; and if we suffer for His name's sake, let us glorify Him. For He has set us this example in Himself, and we have believed that such is the case.
TertullianAD 220
An Answer to the Jews
Therefore He did not maledictively adjudge Christ to this passion, but drew a distinction, that whoever, in any sin, had incurred the judgment of death, and died suspended on a tree, he should be "cursed by God," because his own sins were the cause of his suspension on the tree. On the other hand, Christ, who spoke not guile from His mouth, and who exhibited all righteousness and humility, not only (as we have above recorded it predicted of Him) was not exposed to that kind of death for his own deserts, but (was so exposed) in order that what was predicted by the prophets as destined to come upon Him through your means might be fulfilled; just as, in the Psalms, the Spirit Himself of Christ was already singing, saying, "They were repaying me evil for good; " and, "What I had not seized I was then paying in full; " They exterminated my hands and feet; " and, "They put into my drink gall, and in my thirst they slaked me with vinegar; " "Upon my vesture they did cast (the) lot; " just as the other (outrages) which you were to commit on Him were foretold,-all which He, actually and thoroughly suffering, suffered not for any evil action of His own, but "that the Scriptures from the mouth of the prophets might be fulfilled.
Augustine of HippoAD 430
AGAINST JULIAN 5.15.57
Note that the apostle holds this statement that Christ did no sin sufficient to prove that there was no sin in him. He who did not sin could not have had sin in him.… Certainly the adult man would have committed sin if there had been sin in the infant. Apart from him there is no one who has not committed sin after reaching his majority, and the reason for this is that there is no one who is without sin at the beginning of infancy.
Cyril of AlexandriaAD 444
SERMONS 45.9
Since human flesh became that of the Word of God, its subjection to corruption has come to an end. He put an end to the sickness of loving pleasure. The only-begotten Word of God has not done this for himself, for his motive is not his own pleasure, but obviously he has done it for us.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
ON DIVINE PROVIDENCE 10.26
Christ was nailed to the cross, paying the penalty not for his own sins but paying the debt of our nature. For our nature was in debt after transgressing the laws of its maker. And since it was in debt and unable to pay, the creator himself in his wisdom devised a way of paying the debt. By taking a human body as capital, he invested it wisely and justly in paying the debt and thereby freeing human nature.
OecumeniusAD 990
Commentary on 1 Peter
For to this you were called, because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that you should follow His steps: who committed no sin, nor was deceit found in His mouth; who, when He was reviled, did not revile in return; when He suffered, He did not threaten, but committed Himself to Him who judges righteously; who Himself bore our sins in His own body on the tree, that we, having died to sins, might live for righteousness; by whose stripes you were healed. For you were like sheep going astray, but have now returned to the Shepherd and Overseer of your souls.
"but committed Himself to Him who judges righteously," namely God, who gives to each according to their works (Rom. 2:6): this is just. But perhaps someone will say: How does Peter now say that the Lord, when he was being reviled, did not return reviling, and when he was suffering evil, did not threaten? Yet we see him calling some Jews dogs (Matt. 7:16; 15:26), and blind Pharisees (Matt. 15:14; 22:16), and threatening the Jews when he said: "It would be better for that man if he had not been born;" (Matt. 26:34) and: "It will be more tolerable for Sodom than for that city;" (Matt. 10:15) and: "Where their worm does not die," (Mark 9:48) and countless other things. We will say, therefore, that he does not say the Lord did not speak reviling, or did not threaten: but, when he was being reviled, he says he did not return reviling, and when he was suffering evil, he did not threaten. But although he might have uttered some reviling, he was not opposing those who reviled him, but reproaching and rebuking those who did not convert. However, when he was affected by reproaches and heard: "You have a demon," (Jn. 7:20; 8:48) and: "By the prince of demons he casts out demons," (Matt. 7:24; 9:34) and: "Behold, a glutton and a wine-drinker," (Matt. 9:19) did he direct reviling against them, saying something reproachful against them? Not at all, but he indeed said to them: "If I cast out demons by Beelzebul, by whom do your sons cast them out?" (Matt. 7:27) Indeed, this man, a ravenous eater and drinker of wine, opposed the parable of the indignant children in the marketplace against those with whom they conspired, that when they played the flutes, they did not dance; when they sang lamentations, they did not weep. However, crucified and afflicted by punishments, he prayed rather than threatened the Jew before he would betray, and being affected by some evil, he threatened, restraining him from evil intent. Similarly, he showed those who would not receive the disciples that they would suffer something worse than the Sodomites: partly indeed urging them towards hospitality, partly opening a place for the preaching of the Gospel through fear. Therefore, he did not threaten these things while he was being afflicted by evils; and the word of Peter concerning the Lord's mercy is very true, saying that he did not bring any accusation against anyone while they attempted to accuse him.
"As dead to sins." For having become estranged by sins, (ταῖς ἁμαρτίαις ἀπογενόμενοι), it is taken for ἀποθάνοντες, that is, dead.
"by whose stripes you were healed." For having been scourged by Pilate, he also bore scourges in the body.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Peter 2:22 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.