TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Kings 14:21–31. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Judah's story and Israel's are intermixed in this book. Jeroboam out-lived Rehoboam, four or five years, yet his history is despatched first, that the account of Rehoboam's reign may be laid together; and a sad account it is.
I.Here is no good said of the king. All the account we have of him here is,
1.That he was forty-one years old when he began to reign, by which reckoning he was born in the last year of David, and had his education, and the forming of his mind, in the best days of Solomon; yet he lived not up to these advantages. Solomon's defection at last did more to corrupt him than his wisdom and devotion had done to give him good principles.
2.That he reigned seventeen years in Jerusalem, the city where God put his name, where he had opportunity enough to know his duty, if he had but had a heart to do it.
3.That his mother was Naamah, an Ammonitess; this is twice mentioned, Kg1 14:21, Kg1 14:31. It was strange that David would marry his son Solomon to an Ammonitess (for it was done while he lived), but it is probable that Solomon was in love with her, because she was Naamah, a beauty (so it signifies), and his father was loth to cross him, but it proved to have a very bad influence upon posterity. Probably she was daughter to Shobi the Ammonite, who was kind to David (Sa2 17:27), and David was too willing to requite him by matching his son into his family. None can imagine how lasting and how fatal the consequences may be of being unequally yoked with unbelievers.
4.That he had continual war with Jeroboam (Kg1 14:30), which could not but be a perpetual uneasiness to him.
5.That when he had reigned but seventeen years he died, and left his throne to his son. His father, and grandfather, and grandson, that reigned well, reigned long, forty years apiece. But sin often shortens men's lives and comforts.
II.Here is much evil said of the subjects, both as to their character and their condition.
1.See here how wicked and profane they were. It is a most sad account that is here given of their apostasy from God, Kg1 14:22-24. Judah, the only professing people God had in the world, did evil in his sight, in contempt and defiance of him and the tokens of his special presence with them; they provoked him to jealousy, as the adulterous wife provokes her husband by breaking the marriage-covenant. Their fathers had been bad enough, especially in the times of the judges, but they did abominable things, above all that their fathers had done. The magnificence of their temple, the pomp of their priesthood, and all the secular advantages with which their religion was attended, could not prevail to keep them to it. Nothing less than the pouring out of the Spirit from on high will keep God's Israel in their allegiance to him. The account here given of the wickedness of the Jews agrees with that which the apostle gives of the wickedness of the Gentile world (Rom 1:21, Rom 1:24), so that both Jew and Gentile are alike under sin, Rom 3:9.
(1.)They became vain in their imaginations concerning God, and changed his glory into an image, for they built themselves high places, images, and groves (Kg1 14:23), profaning God's name by affixing to it their images, and God's ordinances by serving their idols with them. They foolishly fancies that they exalted God when they worshipped him on high hills and pleased him when they worshipped him under the pleasant shadow of green trees.
(2.)They were given up to vile affections (as those idolaters Rom 1:26, Rom 1:27), for there were sodomites in the land (Kg1 14:24), men with men working that which is unseemly, and not to be thought of, much less mentioned, without abhorrence and indignation. They dishonoured God by one sin and then God left them to dishonour themselves by another. They profaned the privileges of a holy nation, therefore God gave them up to their own hearts' lusts, to imitate the abominations of the accursed Canaanites; and herein the Lord was righteous. And, when they did like those that were cast out, how could they expect any other than to be cast out like them?
2.See here how weak and poor they were; and this was the consequence of the former. Sin exposes, impoverishes, and weakens any people. Shishak, king of Egypt, came against them, and so far, either by force or surrender, made himself master of Jerusalem itself that he took away the treasures both of the temple and of the exchequer, of the house of the Lord and of the king's house, which David and Solomon had amassed, Kg1 14:25, Kg1 14:26. These, it is likely, tempted him to make his descent; and, to save the rest, Rehoboam perhaps tamely surrendered them, as Ahab, Kg1 20:4. He also took away the golden shields that were made but in his father's time, Kg1 14:26. These the king of Egypt carried off as trophies of his victory; and, instead of them, Rehoboam made brazen shields, which the life-guard carried before him when he went to church in state, Kg1 14:27, Kg1 14:28. This was an emblem of the diminution of his glory. Sin makes the gold become dim, changes the most fine gold, and turns it into brass. We commend Rehoboam for going to the house of the Lord, perhaps the oftener for the rebuke he had been under, and do not condemn him for going in pomp. Great men should honour God with their honour, and then they are themselves most honoured by it.
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
One surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.
Our Lord and Savior had come for this end, to take on himself humanity’s sins. God “made him who had committed no sin to be sin for our sake.” For this reason, he came down into the world and took on the person of sinners and depraved people. He willed to be born from the stock of Solomon, whose sins have been recorded, and from Rehoboam, whose transgressions are reported, and from the rest of them, many of whom “did evil in the sight of the Lord.”
Continue studying 1 Kings 14:21 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
1 Kings 14:21 introduces Rehoboam, the son of Solomon, as the first king of the southern kingdom of Judah after the division of Israel. The verse provides crucial regnal information, detailing his age at ascension and the length of his seventeen-year reign in Jerusalem. Critically, it highlights Jerusalem's unique status as the city divinely chosen by the LORD to establish His name, while also subtly foreshadowing future spiritual challenges for the Davidic line by mentioning Rehoboam's mother, Naamah, an Ammonitess.
Context
Literary Context
This verse immediately follows the detailed account of Jeroboam's reign over the northern kingdom of Israel, including his establishment of idolatrous worship centers at Dan and Bethel, and the prophetic judgment against him (1 Kings 12:25-14:20). With 1 Kings 14:21, the narrative shifts focus entirely to the southern kingdom of Judah, marking a new phase in the book's dual monarchy history. It serves as the formal introduction to Rehoboam's reign, parallel to how Jeroboam's reign was introduced, establishing the foundational details for the subsequent narrative of Judah's kings. The preceding chapters have meticulously laid out the reasons for the kingdom's division, primarily Solomon's idolatry and Rehoboam's arrogant refusal to heed the people's plea for lighter burdens, setting the stage for the distinct spiritual and political trajectories of the two kingdoms.
Historical & Cultural Context
Rehoboam's ascension occurs in the immediate aftermath of the united monarchy's collapse, a momentous historical event. The mention of his age (41) and length of reign (17 years) is standard biblical practice for royal records, providing chronological anchors. Jerusalem's designation as "the city which the LORD did choose...to put his name there" underscores its theological and political centrality, particularly for the Davidic covenant, which promised an enduring dynasty and a perpetual lamp in Jerusalem (e.g., 1 Kings 11:36). Culturally, the identity of the queen mother was highly significant in ancient Near Eastern monarchies, often wielding considerable influence. The explicit mention of Naamah as an "Ammonitess" is therefore not a mere genealogical detail but a potent theological statement. Ammonites were historical enemies of Israel, descendants of Lot through an incestuous union (Genesis 19:38), and were explicitly forbidden from entering the assembly of the LORD (e.g., Deuteronomy 23:3-6). This foreign, forbidden lineage of the queen mother immediately signals a potential for spiritual compromise and syncretism within the royal household, echoing Solomon's own downfall due to his foreign wives (e.g., 1 Kings 11:1-8).
Key Themes
This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in 1 Kings. Firstly, it highlights the theme of Divine Sovereignty and Judgment, as the kingdom's division and Rehoboam's limited reign are direct consequences of God's judgment against Solomon's apostasy, yet also a demonstration of His faithfulness to the Davidic covenant by preserving a remnant in Judah (e.g., 1 Kings 11:11-13). Secondly, the emphasis on Jerusalem as God's chosen city reinforces the theme of God's Enduring Presence and Covenant Faithfulness, even amidst human failure and national fragmentation. Jerusalem remains the designated place for true worship and the anchor of the Davidic line. Thirdly, the mention of Naamah the Ammonitess introduces the critical theme of Foreign Influence and Spiritual Compromise. This detail foreshadows the pervasive spiritual decline and idolatry that would plague Rehoboam's reign and much of Judah's subsequent history, illustrating the constant temptation for Israel to assimilate with surrounding pagan cultures rather than maintaining its distinct covenant identity (e.g., 1 Kings 14:22-24).
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This verb (H977) signifies a deliberate, sovereign act of selection or election. When applied to God, it emphasizes His divine prerogative and purpose. In the context of Jerusalem, it means God actively and intentionally set apart this city from all others for a specific, sacred purpose—to be the central place for His worship and the dwelling of His name. This choice was not based on Jerusalem's inherent merit but on God's covenantal faithfulness and redemptive plan.
This primitive root (H7760) means "to put" or "to set." In the phrase "to put his name there," it signifies God's active establishment of His presence, ownership, and authority in Jerusalem. It does not mean God's infinite being is confined to a physical space, but rather that Jerusalem, and specifically the Temple within it, was the designated place where God would reveal His character, receive worship, and establish His covenant relationship with His people. It signifies a unique, localized manifestation of divine presence and a point of contact between God and humanity.
This ethnonym (H5985) identifies Naamah as a woman from the nation of Ammon. The Ammonites were perennial adversaries of Israel, known for their pagan worship, including child sacrifice (e.g., Molech worship). Their exclusion from the assembly of the LORD (Deuteronomy 23:3-6) underscores the severity of intermarriage with them. Her nationality immediately signals a potential source of spiritual contamination within the royal family, a direct violation of Mosaic Law, and a continuation of the very sin that led to Solomon's downfall and the kingdom's division.
Verse Breakdown
"And Rehoboam the son of Solomon reigned in Judah."
This clause formally introduces the new king and establishes his lineage as a direct descendant of Solomon, linking him to the Davidic dynasty. It also specifies his domain as "Judah," clearly delineating the southern kingdom after the split, distinguishing it from the northern kingdom of Israel now ruled by Jeroboam. This immediately sets the stage for the separate histories of the two kingdoms.
"Rehoboam [was] forty and one years old when he began to reign, and he reigned seventeen years in Jerusalem,"
This provides essential regnal data. His age at ascension (41) suggests a mature, experienced individual, making his initial poor judgment (1 Kings 12) even more striking. The seventeen-year reign provides a chronological marker for the period of his rule, and "in Jerusalem" reaffirms the city's status as the capital of the Davidic kingdom.
"the city which the LORD did choose out of all the tribes of Israel, to put his name there."
This is a crucial theological statement embedded within historical reporting. It affirms Jerusalem's unique divine election, emphasizing that its significance is not merely political or strategic, but rooted in God's sovereign choice. It was the designated place where God would manifest His presence, receive worship, and establish His covenantal relationship with His people, serving as the spiritual heart of the Davidic kingdom.
"And his mother's name [was] Naamah an Ammonitess."
This seemingly simple genealogical detail carries profound theological weight. The mention of Naamah's foreign, forbidden nationality immediately raises a red flag. Given the Deuteronomic prohibitions against intermarriage with such peoples and the explicit warnings about their idolatrous influence, her background foreshadows the spiritual struggles, syncretism, and unfaithfulness that would characterize Rehoboam's reign and much of Judah's subsequent history. It highlights the ongoing spiritual battle within the Davidic line, despite God's covenant promises.
Literary Devices
1 Kings 14:21 employs several effective literary devices. Juxtaposition is prominent, setting the divinely chosen status of Jerusalem ("the city which the LORD did choose...to put his name there") against the problematic background of Rehoboam's mother, Naamah, an "Ammonitess." This contrast immediately creates tension, highlighting the purity of God's choice versus the potential for human compromise and spiritual impurity within the very heart of the Davidic monarchy. This detail also serves as powerful foreshadowing. The mention of Naamah's nationality, a people explicitly forbidden for intermarriage due to their idolatry, subtly but effectively hints at the spiritual decline and unfaithfulness that will characterize Rehoboam's reign, as explicitly detailed in the subsequent verses (1 Kings 14:22-24). The verse also demonstrates concise reporting, packing a significant amount of historical, genealogical, and theological information into a single sentence, a characteristic feature of biblical historical narratives that convey maximum meaning with minimal words. Finally, the embedded theological statement about Jerusalem's divine election functions as a theological anchor, reminding the reader of God's steadfast purposes even amidst the unfolding narrative of human failure and national division.
Theological and Thematic Connections
1 Kings 14:21 is a microcosm of the larger theological narrative in Kings, illustrating the tension between God's unwavering covenant faithfulness and humanity's persistent disobedience. Despite the dramatic division of the kingdom due to Solomon's idolatry and Rehoboam's folly, God's promise to David remains anchored in Jerusalem, the city where He chose to put His name. This verse underscores that while human actions have profound consequences, they do not ultimately thwart God's sovereign plan. The inclusion of Naamah's Ammonite heritage, however, immediately signals the ongoing spiritual battle within the royal house, a direct consequence of Solomon's unfaithfulness and a harbinger of the idolatry that will plague Judah. It highlights the pervasive danger of foreign influences and the constant need for covenant fidelity, demonstrating that even those within the lineage of promise are susceptible to spiritual compromise if they do not guard against unholy alliances.
Reflection and Application
1 Kings 14:21 offers profound insights for contemporary reflection and application. Firstly, it reminds us that our heritage and the influences within our families, particularly our parents, can significantly shape our spiritual trajectory. While Rehoboam's mother was an Ammonitess, it is not an automatic condemnation, but a warning about the potential for spiritual compromise and the need for intentional discipleship within the home. This calls us to consider the spiritual environment we cultivate for ourselves and our families, recognizing that associations and influences can either draw us closer to God or lead us astray. Secondly, the verse highlights God's unwavering faithfulness to His promises, even when His people are unfaithful. Despite the failures of Solomon and Rehoboam, God did not abandon Jerusalem or the Davidic line. This provides immense comfort and hope, reminding us that God's plans are not contingent on our perfect performance but on His steadfast character. We are called to trust in His faithfulness even when our circumstances or our own failures seem to contradict His promises. Finally, it underscores the critical importance of leadership, both spiritual and secular. Rehoboam's reign, marked by a divided heart and compromised decisions, serves as a cautionary tale for those in positions of influence, emphasizing the profound impact of their choices on the well-being and spiritual health of those they lead.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why is Rehoboam's mother's nationality, "Ammonitess," specifically mentioned in this verse?
The mention of Naamah as an "Ammonitess" is highly significant, not merely a genealogical detail. It serves as a crucial theological warning and foreshadowing. The Ammonites were a people explicitly forbidden for Israelites to intermarry with or admit into the assembly of the LORD (e.g., Deuteronomy 23:3-6), primarily because of their pagan religious practices, including the worship of Molech, which involved child sacrifice. By highlighting Naamah's background, the biblical author subtly indicates a source of spiritual compromise within the royal household from the very beginning of Judah's independent monarchy. This echoes the downfall of Solomon himself, whose foreign wives led him into idolatry (e.g., 1 Kings 11:1-8), and foreshadows the widespread idolatry and unfaithfulness that would characterize Rehoboam's reign and much of Judah's subsequent history (e.g., 1 Kings 14:22-24). It underscores the ongoing spiritual battle for the purity of Israel's worship and covenant fidelity.
What is the significance of Jerusalem being "the city which the LORD did choose...to put his name there"?
This phrase underscores Jerusalem's unique and divinely ordained status. It signifies that Jerusalem, and specifically the Temple built within it, was the singular, divinely appointed place where God chose to manifest His presence, receive worship, and establish His covenant relationship with His people. It's not that God's infinite being is confined to Jerusalem, but rather that He designated it as the central point of contact between Himself and Israel, the place where His character and authority would be uniquely revealed. This choice was foundational to the Davidic covenant, promising an enduring dynasty and a perpetual lamp in Jerusalem (e.g., 2 Samuel 7:13). Even amidst the kingdom's division and the subsequent spiritual failures of its kings, God's election of Jerusalem remained steadfast, demonstrating His faithfulness to His promises despite human sin.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
1 Kings 14:21, while seemingly a straightforward historical record, contains profound Christ-centered implications. The phrase "Jerusalem, the city which the LORD did choose...to put his name there" points forward to the ultimate dwelling place of God's name and presence, not in a physical city or temple, but in the person of Jesus Christ. As John 1:14 declares, "the Word became flesh and dwelt among us," literally "tabernacled" among us, signifying that Jesus Himself is the true Temple, the ultimate locus of God's presence. In Him, "all the fullness of the Godhead dwells bodily" (Colossians 2:9). Furthermore, Rehoboam's lineage, despite his flaws and the kingdom's division, is part of the unbroken Davidic line that ultimately leads to Jesus, the Messiah, as affirmed in Matthew 1:7. The mention of Naamah the Ammonitess, a forbidden foreign influence, highlights the spiritual brokenness and need for redemption that characterized even the chosen lineage. This underscores the radical nature of Christ's inclusive gospel, which breaks down barriers between Jew and Gentile, bringing all who believe into a new, spiritual family, not based on earthly heritage but on being born of God (John 1:12-13). Jesus, the true King, perfectly fulfills the divine purpose for which Jerusalem was chosen, for it is in Him that God's name is truly glorified, and through His sacrifice in that very city, He establishes a new covenant and an eternal kingdom that will never be divided or compromised by sin.