Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
If the place which the LORD thy God hath chosen to put his name there be too far from thee, then thou shalt kill of thy herd and of thy flock, which the LORD hath given thee, as I have commanded thee, and thou shalt eat in thy gates whatsoever thy soul lusteth after.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
If the place H4725 which the LORD H3068 thy God H430 hath chosen H977 to put H7760 his name H8034 there be too far H7368 from thee, then thou shalt kill H2076 of thy herd H1241 and of thy flock H6629, which the LORD H3068 hath given H5414 thee, as I have commanded H6680 thee, and thou shalt eat H398 in thy gates H8179 whatsoever thy soul H5315 lusteth after H185.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
If the place which ADONAI your God chooses to place his name is too far away from you; then you are to slaughter animals from your cattle or sheep, which ADONAI has given you; and eat on your own property, as much as you want.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
If the place where the LORD your God chooses to put His Name is too far from you, then you may slaughter any of the herd or flock He has given you, as I have commanded you, and you may eat it within your gates whenever you want.
Ask
American Standard Version
If the place which Jehovah thy God shall choose, to put his name there, be too far from thee, then thou shalt kill of thy herd and of thy flock, which Jehovah hath given thee, as I have commanded thee; and thou mayest eat within thy gates, after all the desire of thy soul.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
If the place which the LORD your God shall choose, to put his name there, is too far from you, then you shall kill of your herd and of your flock, which the LORD has given you, as I have commanded you; and you may eat within your gates, after all the desire of your soul.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
If the place which the Lord thy God hath chosen to put his Name there, be farre from thee, then thou shalt kill of thy bullockes, and of thy sheepe which the Lord hath giuen thee, as I haue commanded thee, and thou shalt eat in thy gates, whatsoeuer thine heart desireth.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
`When the place is far from thee which Jehovah thy God doth choose to put His name there, then thou hast sacrificed of thy herd and of thy flock which Jehovah hath given to thee, as I have commanded thee, and hast eaten within thy gates, of all the desire of thy soul;
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Deuteronomy 12:21 articulates a vital divine concession within the Mosaic Law, allowing Israelites residing far from the divinely chosen central sanctuary to slaughter animals for common, non-sacrificial consumption in their local towns. This provision skillfully balanced God's foundational command for centralized worship and ritual offerings at the "place where He would put His name" with the practical realities of daily life and the inevitable geographical dispersion of the Israelite population across the Promised Land. It critically distinguished between the sacred act of sacrificial slaughter and the ordinary, secular butchery for sustenance, thereby demonstrating God's profound understanding of human needs and His benevolent provision for His people's daily lives and well-being.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Deuteronomy 12:21 is situated within Deuteronomy's extensive legal corpus (chapters 12-26), which serves as a comprehensive re-articulation and expansion of the Sinai covenant laws, specifically tailored for the new generation poised to enter and inhabit the Promised Land. Chapter 12 is particularly focused on the imperative to dismantle all pagan cultic sites and to centralize the exclusive worship of Yahweh at a single, divinely designated location. Verses such as Deuteronomy 12:5 and Deuteronomy 12:11 repeatedly underscore this command for a singular worship site, where all sacrifices, tithes, and offerings were to be brought. Deuteronomy 12:21 immediately follows instructions concerning the consumption of clean and unclean animals and precedes further regulations on the prohibition of consuming blood, thereby clarifying the boundaries of permissible meat consumption outside the strict sacrificial system. This concession is a necessary practical adjustment within the broader framework of centralized worship.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: As the Israelites prepared to transition from a nomadic existence in the wilderness to a settled, agrarian life across the vast expanse of Canaan, the command for centralized worship, while crucial for maintaining theological purity and national unity under Yahweh, presented significant logistical challenges. In the ancient Near East, the act of slaughtering an animal was frequently imbued with religious significance, often associated with offerings or rituals. Prior to this concession, the general understanding was that animals for consumption were often brought as peace offerings to the tabernacle (Leviticus 17:3-4). Therefore, Deuteronomy 12:21 represents a profound adaptation of the law to the future realities of a geographically dispersed population. It provided a vital distinction between ritual sacrifice and common, secular butchery for daily sustenance, a distinction indispensable for the practical daily life of a growing nation no longer confined to a single camp.
  • Key Themes: This verse significantly contributes to several overarching themes evident throughout Deuteronomy and the Pentateuch. Firstly, it powerfully illustrates Divine Accommodation and Provision, showcasing God's compassionate understanding of human practicality and His willingness to adapt His laws to the realities of His people's lives, even while steadfastly upholding core theological principles. Secondly, it highlights the crucial Distinction Between Sacred and Secular, clearly delineating between animals slaughtered for holy, sacrificial purposes at the divinely chosen sanctuary and those slaughtered for ordinary, daily consumption "in thy gates." This distinction was paramount for preventing the profanation of sacred rituals while still allowing for the enjoyment of God's blessings in daily life. Thirdly, the recurring phrase "the place which the LORD thy God hath chosen to put his name there" reinforces the Centrality of God's Name and Presence in Israel's worship and national identity, emphasizing the unique holiness and authority of the designated sanctuary as the focal point of their covenant relationship with Yahweh. This concession, therefore, does not undermine the central sanctuary but rather affirms its unique sacred status by creating a separate, permissible category for secular slaughter.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Chosen (Hebrew, bâchar', H977): This verb (H977) signifies a deliberate, sovereign selection by God. In the context of "the place which the LORD thy God hath chosen to put His name there," it emphasizes that the designation of the central sanctuary (which would eventually be Jerusalem) was not arbitrary or human-initiated, but a divine prerogative. This underscores God's active involvement in establishing the parameters of Israel's worship and national life, ensuring that the focal point of their spiritual identity was divinely ordained and set apart, thereby highlighting its unique holiness and authority.
  • Name (Hebrew, shêm', H8034): The word "name" (H8034) in the phrase "to put His name there" is profoundly significant. It does not imply that God's omnipresence is confined to one location, but rather that this chosen site is where God has elected to manifest His unique presence, covenant faithfulness, and authority in a special, tangible way for His people. It is the designated locus for revelation, atonement, and communal worship, where His identity, character, and reputation are uniquely proclaimed and encountered by Israel. The "name" represents God's very being and reputation, making the chosen place the consecrated site of His covenant relationship with Israel.
  • Lusteth after (Hebrew, ʼavvâh', H185): While the King James Version's "lusteth after" (H185) can carry negative connotations in modern English, the Hebrew verb ʾavvâh (specifically, the Hithpael stem, meaning "to desire for oneself") simply means "to desire," "to crave," or "to long for" in a neutral sense. In this context, it refers to a natural, legitimate appetite or craving for meat. It highlights God's benevolent provision, allowing His people to satisfy a normal physical desire for food, rather than implying a sinful or excessive craving. This demonstrates God's gracious understanding of human physical needs and the enjoyment of His creation within the bounds of His law.

Verse Breakdown

  • "If the place which the LORD thy God hath chosen to put his name there be too far from thee,": This opening clause establishes the specific condition under which the concession is granted. It reiterates the foundational command for a centralized place of worship, emphasizing its divine selection and the special manifestation of God's presence ("to put His name there"). The phrase "too far from thee" explicitly acknowledges the practical geographical challenges that would inevitably arise as the Israelites settled throughout the vast Promised Land, making frequent travel to a single sanctuary for every instance of meat consumption impractical or even impossible. This demonstrates God's foresight and practical wisdom in legislating for a future reality.
  • "then thou shalt kill of thy herd and of thy flock, which the LORD hath given thee, as I have commanded thee,": This clause grants the specific permission for secular slaughter. It clearly specifies that the animals must originate "of thy herd and of thy flock," emphasizing that these are God's gracious provisions to His people. The crucial phrase "as I have commanded thee" implies that even this secular slaughter is not unregulated; rather, it must adhere to specific dietary laws (e.g., clean animals, proper bleeding as per Deuteronomy 12:23-25), thereby distinguishing it from pagan practices and maintaining a level of holiness in daily life. This is not a license for lawlessness but a regulated freedom that respects divine principles.
  • "and thou shalt eat in thy gates whatsoever thy soul lusteth after.": This concluding clause specifies both the permissible location and the extent of the consumption. "In thy gates" refers to their local towns or settlements, indicating that the slaughter and consumption are to occur within their domestic or communal sphere, distinct from the central sanctuary. "Whatsoever thy soul lusteth after" (as clarified above, meaning "desires" or "craves") underscores the generosity of God's provision, allowing the Israelites to enjoy the meat they desire for sustenance and pleasure, without the previous requirement of a sacrificial offering. This highlights God's benevolence and His profound care for the physical well-being and enjoyment of His people.

Literary Devices

Deuteronomy 12:21 skillfully employs several literary devices to convey its profound message. Most notably, it demonstrates Divine Accommodation, where God, in His infinite wisdom and compassion, adapts His perfect law to the practical limitations and realities of human existence. While the overarching principle of centralized worship remains paramount, God makes a gracious concession for daily life, demonstrating His understanding of human geography and convenience. There is also a clear Contrast established between the sacred sphere of the central sanctuary, where ritual sacrifices are exclusively performed, and the secular sphere of "thy gates," where animals may be slaughtered for common food. This distinction is vital for maintaining the holiness of the sanctuary while permitting the enjoyment of God's provisions in daily life. Furthermore, the phrase "the place which the LORD thy God hath chosen to put His name there" functions as a Leitwort or recurring motif throughout Deuteronomy 12, emphasizing the singular, divinely appointed nature of the worship site and reinforcing its theological significance even as practical exceptions are made for daily life.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Deuteronomy 12:21 offers a profound glimpse into God's character as both sovereign and deeply compassionate. While He establishes absolute commands for worship and holiness, He simultaneously demonstrates a profound understanding of human practicalities and geographical limitations. This verse reveals a God who is not a rigid taskmaster but a benevolent Father who thoughtfully provides for the daily needs and legitimate desires of His children. It underscores the principle that not all interaction with the created order needs to be ritualistically consecrated to be blessed by God; daily sustenance, when pursued within His broader moral and dietary framework, is also part of His gracious provision. This distinction between sacred and secular slaughter, while unique to the Mosaic covenant's sacrificial system, sets a precedent for understanding how God's principles can be applied with wisdom and flexibility in different contexts, allowing for both fervent devotion and practical daily living.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Deuteronomy 12:21 provides a powerful and enduring reminder that God's laws are not arbitrary burdens but are thoughtfully given for our ultimate good, often incorporating profound wisdom and compassion for our inherent human limitations. This verse encourages us to perceive God as deeply concerned with both our spiritual devotion and our practical, everyday well-being. It challenges us to thoughtfully consider how we balance our unwavering commitment to corporate worship and essential spiritual disciplines with the unavoidable realities of our daily lives, demanding work, and family responsibilities. Just as God graciously made provision for the Israelites' physical sustenance, He continues to provide for our needs today, inviting us to live all of life under His benevolent gaze. We are called to honor God not only in our sacred spaces and dedicated times but also, and equally importantly, in the mundane moments, within our homes and workplaces, recognizing that His boundless grace extends to every single aspect of our existence.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does this verse deepen my understanding of God's character, particularly His perfect balance of holiness and compassionate understanding?
  • In what specific areas of my life do I need to more clearly distinguish between "sacred" and "secular" activities in a way that truly honors God while living practically?
  • How can I apply the principle of divine accommodation to my own spiritual walk, trusting that God meets me where I am while continually calling me to greater growth and devotion?
  • What legitimate "desires" or "cravings" in my life (whether physical, emotional, or relational) can I confidently bring before God, trusting in His faithful provision and blessing?

FAQ

Did this verse abolish the need for sacrifices at the central sanctuary?

Answer: No, this verse did not abolish the need for sacrifices at the central sanctuary. On the contrary, it reinforced the unique sacredness of the "place which the LORD thy God hath chosen to put His name there" by clearly distinguishing between animals slaughtered for ritual sacrifice and those slaughtered for common, secular consumption. All sacrificial offerings, peace offerings, burnt offerings, and tithes were still strictly commanded to be brought to the central sanctuary (Deuteronomy 12:6). Deuteronomy 12:21 simply provided a necessary concession for daily life, acknowledging that it would be impractical for every Israelite to travel to the distant sanctuary every time they wished to eat meat. It allowed for the enjoyment of God's provision for food without in any way profaning the sacred sacrificial system or diminishing its importance.

What does "eat in thy gates" mean?

Answer: "Eat in thy gates" refers to consuming meat within one's local town or settlement, outside the immediate confines of the central sanctuary. In ancient Israelite cities, the "gates" were far more than mere entry points; they often served as vital public spaces for gathering, commerce, and legal proceedings. Thus, "in thy gates" signifies the domestic or common sphere of life, distinctly opposed to the sacred, cultic sphere of the tabernacle or temple. This phrase underscores the explicit permission to slaughter and consume meat for ordinary sustenance in their own communities, without the previous requirement of bringing the animal to the distant, divinely chosen place for a sacrificial offering. It vividly highlights the practical shift from a more nomadic, centralized camp life to a settled, geographically dispersed national life in the Promised Land.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Deuteronomy 12:21, with its profound emphasis on a divinely chosen place for God's name to dwell and the gracious provision for daily sustenance, finds its ultimate and glorious fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. The "place which the LORD thy God hath chosen to put His name there" ultimately points beyond any physical temple or sanctuary to Christ Himself, who is the true and perfect dwelling place of God among humanity. As John 1:14 so profoundly declares, "The Word became flesh and made His dwelling among us," literally "tabernacled" among us. In Christ, God's very name, His complete presence, and His full character are perfectly revealed and made accessible to all, no longer limited by geographical distance or the necessity of physical pilgrimage. He is the ultimate "Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world!" (John 1:29) whose singular, perfect sacrifice on the cross fulfills and transcends all the Old Testament sacrificial laws, providing complete and eternal atonement and direct, unhindered access to God for all who believe (Hebrews 10:10-14). Furthermore, just as God graciously provided physical sustenance for His people in the wilderness and the Promised Land, Jesus identifies Himself as the "bread of life" (John 6:35), offering spiritual nourishment that satisfies the deepest desires of the soul, far surpassing mere physical cravings. Through Him, believers are no longer bound by the limitations of distance or ritual, but can "eat" and partake of His life-giving presence wherever they are, finding spiritual sustenance and intimate communion with God in every aspect of their "gates" or daily lives.

Copy as

Commentary on Deuteronomy 12 verses 5–32

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

There is not any one particular precept (as I remember) in all the law of Moses so largely pressed and inculcated as this, by which they are all tied to bring their sacrifices to that one altar which was set up in the court of the tabernacle, and there to perform all the rituals of their religion; for, as to moral services, then, no doubt, as now, men might pray every where, as they did in their synagogues. The command to do this, and the prohibition of the contrary, are here repeated again and again, as we teach children: and yet we are sure that there is in scripture no vain repetition; but all this stress is laid upon it, 1. Because of the strange proneness there was in the hearts of the people to idolatry and superstition, and the danger of their being seduced by the many temptations which they would be surrounded with. 2. Because of the great use which the observance of this appointment would be of to them, both to prevent the introducing of corrupt customs into their worship and to preserve among them unity and brotherly love, that, meeting all in one place, they might continue both of one way and of one heart. 3. Because of the significancy of this appointment. They must keep to one place, in token of their belief of those two great truths, which we find together (Ti1 2:5), That there is one God, and one Mediator between God and man. It not only served to keep up the notion of the unity of the Godhead, but was an intimation to them (though they could not stedfastly discern it) of the one only way of approach to God and communion with him, in and by the Messiah.

Let us now reduce this long charge to its proper heads.

I. It is here promised that when they were settled in Canaan, when they had rest from their enemies, and dwelt in safety, God would choose a certain place, which he would appoint to be the centre of their unity, to which they should bring all their offerings, Deu 12:10, Deu 12:11. Observe, 1. If they just be tied to one place, they should not be left in doubt concerning it, but should certainly know what place it was. Had Christ intended, under the gospel, to make any one place such a seat of power as Rome pretends to be, we should not have been left so destitute of instruction as we are concerning the appointed place. 2. God does not leave it to them to choose the place, lest the tribes should have quarrelled about it, each striving, for their secular advantage, to have it among them; but he reserves the choice to himself, as he does the designation of the Redeemer and the institution of holy ordinances. 3. He does not appoint the place now, as he had appointed mounts Gerizim and Ebal, for the pronouncing of the blessings and curses (Deu 11:29), but reserves the doing of it till hereafter, that hereby they might be made to expect further directions from heaven, and a divine conduct, after Moses should be removed. The place which God would choose is said to be the place where he would put his name, that is, which he would have to be called his, where his honour should dwell, where he would manifest himself to his people, and make himself known, as men do by their names, and where he would receive addresses, by which his name is both praised and called upon. It was to be his habitation, where, as King of Israel, he would keep court, and be found by all those that reverently sought him. The ark was the token of God's presence, and where that was put there God put his name, and that was his habitation. It contained the tables of the law; for none must expect to receive favours from God's hand but those that are willing to receive the law from his mouth. The place which God first chose for the ark to reside in was Shiloh; and, after that place had sinned away its honours, we find the ark at Kirjath-jearim and other places; but at length, in David's time, it was fixed at Jerusalem, and God said concerning Solomon's temple, more expressly than ever he had said concerning any other place, This I have chosen for a house of sacrifice, Ch2 7:12. Compare Ch2 6:5. Now, under the gospel, we have no temple that sanctifies the gold, no altar that sanctifies the gift, but Christ only; and, as to the places of worship, the prophets foretold that in every place the spiritual incense should be offered, Mal 1:11. And our Saviour has declared that those are accepted as true worshippers who worship God in sincerity and truth, without regard either to this mountain or Jerusalem, Joh 4:23.

II. They are commanded to bring all their burnt-offerings and sacrifices to this place that God would choose (Deu 12:6 and again Deu 12:11): Thither shall you bring all that I command you; and (Deu 12:14), There thou shalt offer thy burnt offerings; and (Deu 12:27), The flesh and the blood must be offered upon the altar of the Lord thy God. And of their peace-offerings, here called their sacrifices, though they were to eat the flesh, yet the blood was to be poured out upon the altar. By this they were taught that sacrifices and offerings God did not desire, nor accept, for their own sake, nor for any intrinsic worth in them, as natural expressions of homage and adoration; but that they received their virtue purely from that altar on which they were offered, as it typified Christ; whereas prayers and praises, as much more necessary and valuable, were to be offered every day by the people of God wherever they were. A devout Israelite might honour God, and keep up communion with him, and obtain mercy from him, though he had not an opportunity, perhaps, for many months together, of bringing a sacrifice to his altar. But this signified the obligation we Christians are under to offer up all our spiritual sacrifices to God in the name of Jesus Christ, hoping for acceptance only upon the score of his mediation, Pe1 2:5.

III. They are commanded to feast upon their hallowed things before the Lord, with holy joy. They must not only bring to the altar the sacrifices which were to be offered to God, but hey must bring to the place of the altar all those things which they were appointed by the law to eat and drink, to the honour of God, in token of their communion with him, Deu 12:6. Their, tithes, and heave-offerings of their hand, that is, their first-fruits, their vows, and free-will-offerings, and firstlings, all those things which were to be religiously made use of either by themselves or by the priests and Levites, must be brought to the place which God would choose; as all the revenues of the crown, from all parts of the kingdom, are brought into the exchequer. And (Deu 12:7): There you shall eat before the Lord, and rejoice in all that you put your hands unto; and again (Deu 12:12), You shall rejoice before the Lord, you, and your sons, and your daughters. Observe here, 1. That what we do in the service of God and to his glory redounds to our benefit, if it be not our own fault. Those that sacrifice to God are welcome to eat before him, and to feast upon their sacrifices: he sups with us, and we with him, Rev 3:20. If we glorify God, we edify ourselves, and cultivate our own minds, through the grace of God, by the increase of our knowledge and faith, the enlivening of devout affections, and the confirming of gracious habits and resolutions: thus is the soul nourished. 2. That work for God should be done with holy joy and cheerfulness. You shall eat and rejoice, Deu 12:7, and again, Deu 12:12 and Deu 12:18. (1.) Now while they were before the Lord they must rejoice, Deu 12:12. It is the will of God that we should serve him with gladness; none displeased him more than those that covered his altar with tears. Mal 2:13. See what a good Master we serve, who has made it our duty to sing at our work. Even the children and servants must rejoice with them before God, that the services of religion might be a pleasure to them, and not a task or drudgery. (2.) They must carry away with them the grateful relish of that delight which they found in communion with God; they must rejoice in all that they put their hands unto, Deu 12:7. Some of the comfort which they must take with them into their common employments; and, being thus strengthened in soul, whatever they did they must do it heartily and cheerfully. And this holy pious joy in God and his goodness, with which we are to rejoice evermore, would be the best preservative against the sin and snare of vain and carnal mirth and a relief against the sorrows of the world.

IV. They are commanded to be kind to the Levites. Did they feast with joy? The Levites must feast with them, and rejoice with them, Deu 12:12, and again, Deu 12:18; and a general caution (Deu 12:19), Take heed that thou forsake not the Levite as long as thou livest. There were Levites that attended the altar as assistants to the priests, and these must not be forsaken, that is, the service they performed must be constantly adhered to; no other altar must be set up than that which God appointed; for that would be to forsake the Levites. But this seems to be spoken of the Levites that were dispersed in the country to instruct the people in the law of God, and to assist them in their devotions; for it is the Levite within their gates that they are here commanded to make much of. It is a great mercy to have Levites near us, within our gates, that we may ask the law at their mouth, and at our feasts to be a check upon us, to restrain excesses. And it is the duty of people to be kind to their ministers that give them good instructions and set them good examples. As long as we live we shall need their assistance, till we come to that world where ordinances will be superseded; and therefore as long as we live we must not forsake the Levites. The reason given (Deu 12:12) is because the Levite has no part nor inheritance with you, so that he cannot grow rich by husbandry or trade; let him therefore share with you in the comfort of your riches. They must give the Levites their tithes and offerings, settled on them by the law, because they had no other maintenance.

V. They are allowed to eat common flesh, but not the flesh of their offerings, in their own houses, wherever they dwelt. What was any way devoted to God they must not eat at home, Deu 12:13, Deu 12:17. But what was not so devoted they might kill and eat of at their pleasure, Deu 12:15. And this permission is again repeated, Deu 12:20-22. It should seem that while they were in the wilderness they did not eat the flesh of any of those kinds of beasts that were used in sacrifice, but what was killed at the door of the tabernacle, and part of it presented to God as a peace-offering, Lev 17:3, Lev 17:4. But when they came to Canaan, where they must live at a great distance from the tabernacle, they might kill what they pleased for their own use of their flocks and herds, without bringing part to the altar. This allowance is very express, and repeated, lest Satan should take occasion from that law which forbade the eating of their sacrifices at their own houses to suggest to them, as he did to our first parents, hard thoughts of God, as if he grudged them: Thou mayest eat whatsoever thy soul lusteth after. There is a natural regular appetite, which it is lawful to gratify with temperance and sobriety, not taking too great a pleasure in the gratification, nor being uneasy if it be crossed. The unclean, who might not eat of the holy things, yet might eat of the same sort of flesh when it was only used as common food. The distinction between clean persons and unclean was sacred, and designed for the preserving of the honour of their holy feasts, and therefore must not be brought into their ordinary meals. This permission has a double restriction: - 1. They must eat according to the blessing which God had given them, Deu 12:15. Note, It is not only our wisdom, but our duty, to live according to our estates, and not to spend above what we have. As it is unjust on the one hand to hoard what should be laid out, so it is much more unjust to lay out more than we have; for what is not our own must needs be another's, who is thereby robbed and defrauded. And this, I say, is much more unjust, because it is easier afterwards to distribute what has been unduly spared, and so to make a sort of restitution for the wrong, than it is to repay to wife, and children, and creditors, what has been unduly spent. Between these two extremes let wisdom find the mean, and then let watchfulness and resolution keep it. 2. They must not eat blood (Deu 12:16, and again, Deu 12:23): Only be sure that thou eat not the blood (Deu 12:24), Thou shalt not eat it; and (Deu 12:25), Thou shalt not eat it, that it may go well with thee. When they could not bring the blood to the altar, to pour it out there before the Lord, as belonging to him, they must pour it out upon the earth, as not belonging to them, because it was the life, and therefore, as an acknowledgment, belonged to him who gives life, and, as an atonement, belonged to him to whom life is forfeited. Bishop Patrick thinks one reason why they were forbidden thus strictly the eating of blood was to prevent the superstitions of the old idolaters about the blood of their sacrifices, which they thought their demons delighted in, and by eating of which they imagined that they had communion with them.

VI. They are forbidden to keep up either their own corrupt usages in the wilderness or the corrupt usages of their predecessors in the land of Canaan.

1.They must not keep up those improper customs which they had got into in the wilderness, and which were connived at in consideration of the present unsettledness of their condition (Deu 12:8, Deu 12:9): You shall not do after all the things that we do here this day. Never was there a better governor than Moses, and one would think never a better opportunity of keeping up good order and discipline than now among the people of Israel, when they lay so closely encamped under the eye of their governor; and yet it seems there was much amiss and many irregularities had crept in among them. We must never expect to see any society perfectly pure and right, and as it should be till we come to the heavenly Canaan. They had sacrifices and religious worship, courts of justice and civil government, and, by the stoning of the man that gathered sticks on the sabbath day, it appears there was great strictness used in guarding the most weighty matters of the law; but being frequently upon the remove, and always at uncertainty, (1.) They could none of them observe the solemn feasts, and the rites of cleansing, with the exactness that the law required. And, (2.) Those among them that were disposed to do amiss had opportunity given them to do it unobserved by the frequent interruptions which their removals gave to the administration of justice. But (says Moses) when you come to Canaan, you shall not do as we do here. Note, When the people of God are in an unsettled condition, that may be tolerated and dispensed with which would by no means be allowed at another time. Cases of necessity are to be considered while the necessity continues; but that must not be done in Canaan which was done in the wilderness. While a house is in the building a great deal of dirt and rubbish are suffered to lie by it, which must all be taken away when the house is built. Moses was now about to lay down his life and government, and it was a comfort to him to foresee that Israel would be better in the next reign than they had been in his.

2.They must not worship the Lord by any of those rites or ceremonies which the notions of Canaan had made use of in the service of their gods, Deu 12:29-32. They must not so much as enquire into the modes and forms of idolatrous worship. What good would it do to them to know those depths of Satan? Rev 2:24. It is best to be ignorant of that which there is danger of being infected by. They must not introduce the customs of idolaters, (1.) Because it would be absurd to make those their patterns whom God had made their slaves and captives, cut off, and destroyed from before them. The Canaanites had not flourished and prospered so much in the service of their gods as that the Israelites should be invited to take up their customs. Those are wretchedly besotted indeed who will walk in the way of sinners, after they have seen their end. (2.) Because some of their customs were most barbarous and inhuman, and such as trampled, not only upon the light and law of nature, but upon natural affection itself, as burning their sons and their daughters in the fire to their gods (Deu 12:31), the very mention of which is sufficient to make it odious, and possess us with a horror of it. (3.) Because their idolatrous customs were an abomination to the Lord, and the translating of them into his worship would make even that an abomination and an affront to him by which they should give him honour, and by which they hoped to obtain his favour. The case is bad indeed when the sacrifice itself has become an abomination, Pro 15:8. He therefore concludes (Deu 12:32) with the same caution concerning the worship of God which he had before given concerning the word of God (Deu 4:2): "You shall not add thereto any inventions of your own, under pretence of making the ordinance either more significant or more magnificent, nor diminish from it, under pretence of making it more easy and practicable, or of setting aside that which may be spared; but observe to do all that, and that only, which God has commanded." We may then hope in our religious worship to obtain the divine acceptance when we observe the divine appointment. God will have his own work done in his own way.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 5–32. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Deuteronomy 12:21 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.