Skip to content
“The Sacrifice Outside the Camp”· Hebrews 13:10–17
Translation
King James Version
For the bodies of those beasts, whose blood is brought into the sanctuary by the high priest for sin, are burned without the camp.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
For G1063 the bodies G4983 of those G5130 beasts G2226, whose G3739 blood G129 is brought G1533 into G1519 the sanctuary G39 by G1223 the high priest G749 for G4012 sin G266, are burned G2618 without G1854 the camp G3925.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
For the cohen hagadol brings the blood of animals into the Holiest Place as a sin offering, but their bodies are burned outside the camp.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Although the high priest brings the blood of animals into the Holy Place as a sacrifice for sin, the bodies are burned outside the camp.
Ask
American Standard Version
For the bodies of those beasts whose blood is brought into the holy place by the high priest as an offering for sin, are burned without the camp.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
For the bodies of those animals, whose blood is brought into the holy place by the high priest as an offering for sin, are burned outside of the camp.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
For the bodies of those beastes whose blood is brought into the Holy place by the high Priest for sinne, are burnt without the campe.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
for of those beasts whose blood is brought for sin into the holy places through the chief priest--of these the bodies are burned without the camp.
Ask
In the KJVVerse 30,253 of 31,102 · 97.3%

Study This Verse

Summary

Hebrews 13:11 provides a crucial link between the Old Covenant sacrificial system and the New Covenant reality in Christ, specifically highlighting a detail from the Day of Atonement rituals. It states that the bodies of the sin offerings, whose blood was brought into the sanctuary by the high priest for the atonement of sins, were not consumed within the holy precincts but were burned completely "without the camp." This practice underscored the profound defilement associated with sin and the necessity for its complete removal from the holy community, thereby setting the stage for understanding the nature and location of Christ's supreme sacrifice.

Context

Literary Context

Hebrews 13:11 is situated within the concluding exhortations of the Epistle to the Hebrews, following a lengthy theological exposition on the superiority of Christ's priesthood and sacrifice over the Old Covenant system. The author has meticulously argued that Jesus is a better High Priest, serving in a better sanctuary, offering a better sacrifice, and inaugurating a better covenant. Chapter 13 shifts from doctrinal exposition to practical application, urging believers to live out their faith in light of these profound truths. Verses 10-14 specifically draw a direct parallel between the Old Testament sin offerings and Jesus' suffering outside Jerusalem, calling believers to embrace the reproach of Christ. This verse serves as the immediate Old Testament precedent for the subsequent call to "go forth... without the camp, bearing his reproach" in Hebrews 13:13.

Historical & Cultural Context

The verse directly references the sacrificial practices prescribed in the Mosaic Law, particularly those for the Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur). On this most solemn day of the Israelite calendar, the high priest entered the Most Holy Place to make atonement for himself and for the sins of the people. While the blood of the bull and goat for the sin offering was brought into the sanctuary, the carcasses of these animals were taken "outside the camp" (in the wilderness) or "outside the city" (once settled in Jerusalem) and burned. This practice, detailed in Leviticus 16:27, signified the utter defilement of sin and the complete removal of its impurity from the holy community of Israel. The camp represented the sacred space where God dwelt among His people, and anything bearing the full weight of sin's impurity had to be expelled from it.

Key Themes

This verse contributes significantly to several major themes of the Epistle to the Hebrews. It reinforces the theme of the inadequacy of the Old Covenant sacrifices to truly cleanse sin, as their bodies had to be removed, signifying that the sin they bore was not truly eradicated but merely transferred and exiled. It also highlights the theme of atonement and purification, emphasizing the absolute necessity of dealing with sin's defilement. Most importantly, it serves as a powerful foreshadowing of Christ's sacrifice, setting up the direct comparison in Hebrews 13:12, where Jesus, "that he might sanctify the people with his own blood, suffered without the gate." This prophetic typology underscores the ultimate and complete nature of Christ's atoning work, which fulfills and surpasses all Old Testament shadows.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

bodies sōma' G4983

Refers to the physical remains of the sacrificial animals. In this context, it emphasizes the tangible, physical aspect of the offering that bore the defilement of sin, necessitating its removal and destruction. The burning of the bodies outside the camp highlights the completeness of the removal of that which was deemed unclean.

sanctuary hágion' G39

Denotes a sacred place, specifically referring to the Most Holy Place (Holy of Holies) within the tabernacle or temple, which was the dwelling place of God's presence. The blood was brought into this sacred space for atonement, contrasting sharply with the bodies that were expelled from the holy camp.

burned katakaíō' G2618

Means "to burn down (to the ground), i.e., consume wholly." This term emphasizes the complete destruction and eradication of the defiled bodies, signifying that the sin they represented was utterly removed and destroyed, rather than merely covered or contained within the community.

without éxō' G1854

An adverb meaning "out(-side, of doors)." This spatial indicator is crucial, emphasizing the physical expulsion and separation of the sin-bearing bodies from the holy community, which was symbolized by "the camp."

camp parembolḗ' G3925

Literally refers to an "encampment" or "barracks." In the Old Testament context, "the camp" represented the dwelling place of the Israelites, with the tabernacle at its center, signifying the holy community of God's people. Being "without the camp" meant being outside the sphere of holiness and purity, bearing reproach and defilement.

Verse Breakdown

"For the bodies of those beasts"

This clause introduces the subject of the verse, specifically referring to the physical remains of the sacrificial animals, not their blood. The "beasts" are the sin offerings, particularly those for the Day of Atonement, whose blood was used for atonement.

"whose blood is brought into the sanctuary by the high priest for sin"

This part clarifies the specific ritual being referenced. It highlights that while the blood (the life-giving element, symbolizing atonement) was brought into the most sacred space (the sanctuary) by the high priest to deal with sin, the bodies were treated differently. This distinction is key to the author's argument.

"are burned without the camp"

This final clause describes the fate of the bodies. They were not consumed within the holy precincts or by the priests, but were taken outside the boundaries of the holy community ("without the camp") and completely destroyed by fire. This act symbolized the complete removal and destruction of the sin that the animals had ceremonially borne, emphasizing its defiling nature and the need for its utter expulsion from God's presence and His people.

Literary Devices

The author of Hebrews employs Typology as the primary literary device in this verse. The Old Testament ritual of burning the sin offering bodies "without the camp" serves as a type or foreshadowing of Christ's suffering "without the gate" in Hebrews 13:12. This typological connection highlights the continuity of God's redemptive plan while simultaneously emphasizing the superiority and fulfillment found in Christ. The Contrast between the blood being brought into the sanctuary and the bodies being burned outside the camp is also a powerful rhetorical tool, underscoring the different aspects of the atonement process and setting up the parallel with Christ's dual role as both the atoning sacrifice and the one who bore sin's reproach. Furthermore, the vivid imagery of "burning without the camp" evokes a sense of Exclusion and Defilement, which is then reinterpreted and elevated in the context of Christ's willing identification with humanity's sin and shame.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Hebrews 13:11 profoundly connects the Old Covenant's sacrificial system to the New Covenant's fulfillment in Christ. The burning of the sin offering bodies outside the camp underscored the absolute defilement of sin and the necessity for its complete expulsion from the holy community. These offerings, having symbolically carried the people's sins, became utterly unclean and had to be removed from the presence of God and His people. This act served as a powerful visual lesson that sin cannot abide in God's presence and demands a radical separation and destruction. The author uses this specific detail to draw a direct parallel to Jesus, who, though perfectly pure, bore the full weight of humanity's sin and suffered outside the city gate, becoming "unclean" for our sake, thereby fulfilling and surpassing the Old Testament type by providing a perfect, once-for-all cleansing.

Reflection and Application

Hebrews 13:11, especially when read in conjunction with the subsequent verses, calls believers to a radical identification with Christ. Just as the sin offerings were taken outside the camp, signifying defilement and separation from the holy community, so Jesus suffered outside the city gates of Jerusalem, bearing the reproach and sin of humanity. For us today, this means embracing a counter-cultural posture, willing to step "outside the camp" of societal norms, expectations, and comforts if it means aligning ourselves more fully with Christ and His mission. It is a call to forsake the allure of worldly acceptance and embrace the "reproach of Christ," recognizing that true fellowship with Him may involve discomfort, misunderstanding, or even persecution. This passage challenges us to consider where our loyalties truly lie: within the comfortable confines of the "camp" or alongside Christ, who bore our shame outside its walls. It beckons us to live lives that reflect the transforming power of His sacrifice, seeking true purity and holiness, not through external rituals, but through genuine faith and obedience to the One who suffered for us.

Questions for Reflection

  1. What does it mean for me to "go forth... without the camp, bearing His reproach" in my daily life?
  2. In what ways might I be prioritizing worldly acceptance or comfort over identifying with Christ and His mission?
  3. How does the complete removal of sin symbolized by burning the bodies outside the camp deepen my appreciation for Christ's complete and final atonement?

FAQ

Why were the bodies of the sin offerings burned outside the camp, and not inside?

The practice of burning the bodies of specific sin offerings (like those for the Day of Atonement) "without the camp" was a crucial part of the Mosaic Law, detailed in Leviticus 16:27 and Leviticus 4:11-12. This was done to emphasize the profound defilement of sin. These animals, having symbolically borne the sins of the high priest and the community, became utterly unclean. As such, they could not remain within the holy camp, which represented the dwelling place of God among His people. Their removal and complete destruction by fire outside the camp signified the absolute necessity of expelling sin and its impurity from God's presence and from the holy community. It underscored the seriousness of sin and the radical measures required for purification, setting a powerful stage for understanding Christ's ultimate sacrifice.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Hebrews 13:11 finds its ultimate and profound fulfillment in Jesus Christ. The Old Testament ritual of burning the sin offering bodies "without the camp" was a powerful type pointing to the antitype in Christ. Just as those animals bore the defilement of sin and were expelled from the holy community, so Jesus, though sinless, bore the full weight of humanity's sin and shame. He was led outside the city gate of Jerusalem to suffer and die, specifically at Golgotha, a place of execution and public disgrace. This act was not merely a geographical detail but a profound theological statement: Jesus became the ultimate sin offering, taking on our defilement and being cast out, so that we might be brought near to God. His suffering "without the gate" in Hebrews 13:12 signifies His complete identification with our fallen state and His willingness to bear the ultimate reproach for our redemption. Through His once-for-all sacrifice, He perfectly accomplished what the Old Covenant sacrifices could only foreshadow, providing true and eternal cleansing for those who come to Him by faith, enabling us to enter the true sanctuary, the very presence of God, through His own blood.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Hebrews 13:1–17. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 17 verses
Passage under commentHebrews 13:1–17
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

The design of Christ in giving himself for us is that he may purchase to himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works. Now the apostle calls the believing Hebrews to the performance of many excellent duties, in which it becomes Christians to excel.

I.To brotherly love (Heb 13:1), by which he does not only mean a general affection to all men, as our brethren by nature, all made of the same blood, nor that more limited affection which is due to those who are of the same immediate parents, but that special and spiritual affection which ought to exist among the children of God.

1.It is here supposed that the Hebrews had this love one for another. Though, at this time, that nation was miserably divided and distracted among themselves, both about matters of religion and the civil state, yet there was true brotherly love left among those of them who believed on Christ; and this appeared in a very eminent manner presently after the shedding forth of the Holy Ghost, when they had all things common, and sold their possessions to make a general fund of subsistence to their brethren. The spirit of Christianity is a spirit of love. Faith works by love. The true religion is the strongest bond of friendship; if it be not so, it has its name for nothing.

2.This brotherly love was in danger of being lost, and that in a time of persecution, when it would be most necessary; it was in danger of being lost by those disputes that were among them concerning the respect they ought still to have to the ceremonies of the Mosaic law. Disputes about religion too often produce a decay of Christian affection; but this must be guarded against, and all proper means used to preserve brotherly love. Christians should always love and live as brethren, and the more they grow in devout affection to God their heavenly Father the more they will grow in love to one another for his sake.

II.To hospitality:

Be not forgetful to entertain strangers for his sake, Heb 13:2. We must add to brotherly kindness charity. Here observe,

1.The duty required - to entertain strangers, both those that are strangers to the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers to our persons, especially those who know themselves to be strangers here and are seeking another country, which is the case of the people of God, and was so at this time: the believing Jews were in a desperate and distressed condition. But he seems to speak of strangers as such; though we know not who they are, nor whence they come, yet, seeing they are without any certain dwelling place, we should allow them room in our hearts and in our houses, as we have opportunity and ability.

2.The motive: Thereby some have entertained angels unawares; so Abraham did (Gen. 18), and Lot (Gen. 19), and one of those that Abraham entertained was the Son of God; and, though we cannot suppose this will ever be our case, yet what we do to strangers, in obedience to him, he will reckon and reward as done to himself. Mat 25:35, I was a stranger, and you took me in. God has often bestowed honours and favours upon his hospitable servants, beyond all their thoughts, unawares.

III.To Christian sympathy: Remember those that are in bonds, Heb 13:3. Here observe,

1.The duty - to remember those that are in bonds and in adversity.

(1.)God often orders it so that while some Christians and churches are in adversity others enjoy peace and liberty. All are not called at the same time to resist unto blood.

(2.)Those that are themselves at liberty must sympathize with those that are in bonds and adversity, as if they were bound with them in the same chain: they must fell the sufferings of their brethren.

2.The reason of the duty: As being yourselves in the body; not only in the body natural, and so liable to the like sufferings, and you should sympathize with them now that others may sympathize with you when your time of trial comes; but in the same mystical body, under the same head, and if one member suffer all the rest suffer with it, Co1 12:26. It would be unnatural in Christians not to bear each other's burdens.

IV.To purity and chastity, Heb 13:4. Here you have,

1.A recommendation of God's ordinance of marriage, that it is honourable in all, and ought to be so esteemed by all, and not denied to those to whom God has not denied it. It is honourable, for God instituted it for man in paradise, knowing it was not good for him to be alone. He married and blessed the first couple, the first parents of mankind, to direct all to look unto God in that great concern, and to marry in the Lord. Christ honoured marriage with his presence and first miracle. It is honourable as a means to prevent impurity and a defiled bed. It is honourable and happy, when persons come together pure and chaste, and preserve the marriage bed undefiled, not only from unlawful but inordinate affections.

2.A dreadful but just censure of impurity and lewdness: Whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.

(1.)God knows who are guilty of such sins, no darkness can hide them from him.

(2.)He will call such sins by their proper names, not by the names of love and gallantry, but of whoredom and adultery, whoredom in the single state and adultery in the married state.

(3.)He will bring them into judgment, he will judge them, either by their own consciences here, and set their sins in order before them for their deep humiliation (and conscience, when awakened, will be very severe upon such sinners), or he will set them at his tribunal at death, and in the last day; he will convict them, condemn them, and cast them out for ever, if they die under the guilt of this sin.

V.To Christian contentment, Heb 13:5, Heb 13:6. Here observe,

1.The sin that is contrary to this grace and duty - covetousness, an over eager desire of the wealth of this world, envying those who have more than we. This sin we must allow no place in our conversation; for, though it be a secret lust lurking in the heart, if it be not subdued it will enter into our conversation, and discover itself in our manner of speaking and acting. We must take care not only to keep this sin down, but to root it out of our souls.

2.The duty and grace that is contrary to covetousness - being satisfied and pleased with such things as we have; present things, for past things cannot be recalled, and future things are only in the hand of God. What God gives us from day to day we must be content with, though it fall short of what we have enjoyed heretofore, and though it do not come up to our expectations for the future. We must be content with our present lot. We must bring our minds to our present condition, and this is the sure way to contentment; and those who cannot do it would not be contented though God should raise their condition to their minds, for the mind would rise with the condition. Haman was the great court-favourite, and yet not contented - Ahab on the throne, and yet not contented - Adam in paradise, and yet not contented; yea, the angels in heaven, and yet not contented; but Paul, though abased and empty, had learned in every state, in any state, therewith to be content.

3.What reason Christians have to be contented with their lot.

(1.)God hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee, Heb 13:5, Heb 13:6. This was said to Joshua (Jos 1:5), but belongs to all the faithful servants of God. Old Testament promises may be applied to New Testament saints. This promise contains the sum and substance of all the promises. I will never, no, never leave thee, nor ever forsake thee. Here are no fewer than five negatives heaped together, to confirm the promise; the true believer shall have the gracious presence of God with him in life, at death, and for ever.

(2.)From this comprehensive promise they may assure themselves of help from God: So that we may boldly say, The Lord is my helper; I will not fear what man shall do unto me, Heb 13:6. Men can do nothing against God, and God can make all that men do against his people to turn to their good.

VI.To the duty Christians owe to their ministers, and that both to those that are dead and to those that are yet alive.

1.To those that are dead: Remember those that have had the rule over you, Heb 13:7. Here observe,

(1.)The description given of them. They were such as had the rule over them, and had spoken to them the word of God; their guides and governors, who had spoken to them the word of God. Here is the dignity to which they were advanced - to be rulers and leaders of the people, not according to their own will, but the will and word of God; and this character they filled up with suitable duty: they did not rule at a distance, and rule by others, but they ruled by personal presence and instruction, according to the word of God.

(2.)The duties owing to them, even when they were dead.

[1.]"Remember them - their preaching, their praying, their private counsel, their example."

[2.]"Follow their faith; be stedfast in the profession of the faith they preached to you, and labour after the grace of faith by which they lived and died so well. Consider the end of their conversation, how quickly, how comfortably, how joyfully, they finished their course!" Now this duty of following the same true faith in which they had been instructed the apostle enlarges much upon, and presses them earnestly to it, not only from the remembrance of their faithful deceased guides, but from several other motives.

First, From the immutability and eternity of the Lord Jesus Christ. Though their ministers were some dead, others dying, yet the great head and high priest of the church, the bishop of their souls, ever lives, and is ever the same; and they should be stedfast and immovable, in imitation of Christ, and should remember that Christ ever lives to observe and reward their faithful adherence to his truths, and to observe and punish their sinful departure from him. Christ is the same in the Old Testament day, in the gospel day, and will be so to his people for ever.

Secondly, From the nature and tendency of those erroneous doctrines that they were in danger of falling in with.

a.They were divers and various (Heb 13:9), different from what they had received from their former faithful teachers, and inconsistent with themselves.

b.They were strange doctrines: such as the gospel church was unacquainted with foreign to the gospel.

c.They were of an unsettling, distracting nature, like the wind by which the ship is tossed, and in danger of being driven from its anchor, carried away, and split upon the rocks. They were quite contrary to that grace of God which fixes and establishes the heart, which is an excellent thing. These strange doctrines keep the heart always fluctuating and unsettled.

d.They were mean and low as to their subject. They were about external, little, perishing things, such as meats and drinks, etc.

e.They were unprofitable. Those who were most taken with them, and employed about them, got no real good by them to their own souls. They did not make them more holy, nor more humble, nor more thankful, nor more heavenly.

f.They would exclude those who embraced them from the privileges of the Christian altar (Heb 13:10): We have an altar. This is an argument of the great weight, and therefore the apostle insists the longer upon it. Observe,

(a.)The Christian church has its altar. It was objected against the primitive Christians that their assemblies were destitute of an altar; but this was not true. We have an alter, not a material altar, but a personal one, and that is Christ; he is both our altar, and our sacrifice; he sanctifies the gift. The altars under the law were types of Christ; the brazen altar of the sacrifice, the golden altar of his intercession.

(b.)This altar furnishes out a feast for true believers, a feast upon the sacrifice, a feast of fat things, spiritual strength and growth, and holy delight and pleasure. The Lord's table is not our altar, but it is furnished with provision from the altar. Christ our passover is sacrificed for us (Co1 5:7), and it follows, therefore let us keep the feast. The Lord's supper is the feast of the gospel passover.

(c.)Those who adhere to the tabernacle or the Levitical dispensation, or return to it again, exclude themselves from the privileges of this altar, from the benefits purchased by Christ. If they serve the tabernacle, they are resolved to subject themselves to antiquated rites and ceremonies, to renounce their right to the Christian altar; and this part of the argument he first proves and then improves.

[a.]He proves that this servile adherence to the Jewish state is a bar to the privileges of the gospel altar; and he argues thus: - Under the Jewish law, no part of the sin-offering was to be eaten, but all must be burnt without the camp while they dwelt in tabernacles, and without the gates when they dwelt in cities: now, if they will still be subject to that law, they cannot eat at the gospel-altar; for that which is eaten there is furnished from Christ, who is the great sin-offering. Not that it is the very sin-offering itself, as the papists affirm; for then it was not to be eaten, but burnt; but the gospel feast is the fruit and procurement of the sacrifice, which those have no right to who do not acknowledge the sacrifice itself. And that it might appear that Christ was really the antitype of the sin-offering, and, as such, might sanctify or cleanse his people with his own blood, he conformed himself to the type, in suffering without the gate. This was a striking specimen of his humiliation, as if he had not been fit either for sacred or civil society! And this shows how sin, which was the meritorious cause of the sufferings of Christ, is a forfeiture of all sacred and civil rights, and the sinner a common plague and nuisance to all society, if God should be strict to mark iniquity. Having thus shown that adherence to the Levitical law would, even according to its own rules, debar men from the Christian altar, he proceeds,

[b.]To improve this argument (Heb 13:13-15) in suitable advices. First, Let us go forth therefore unto him without the camp; go forth from the ceremonial law, from sin, from the world, from ourselves, our very bodies, when he calls us. Secondly, Let us be willing to bear his reproach, be willing to be accounted the offscouring of all things, not worthy to live, not worthy to die a common death. This was his reproach, and we must submit to it; and we have the more reason because, whether we go forth from this world to Christ or no, we must necessarily go forth in a little time by death; for here we have no continuing city. Sin, sinners, death, will not suffer us to continue long here; and therefore we should go forth now by faith, and seek in Christ the rest and settlement which this world cannot afford us, Heb 13:14. Thirdly, Let us make a right use of this altar; not only partake of the privileges of it, but discharge the duties of the altar, as those whom Christ has made priests to attend on this altar. Let us bring our sacrifices to this altar, and to this our high priest, and offer them up by him, Heb 13:15, Heb 13:16. Now what are the sacrifices which we must bring and offer on this altar, even Christ? Not any expiatory sacrifices; there is no need of them. Christ has offered the great sacrifice of atonement, ours are only the sacrifices of acknowledgment; and they are, 1. The sacrifice of praise to God, which we should offer up to God continually. In this are included all adoration and prayer, as well as thanksgiving; this is the fruit of our lips; we must speak forth the praises of God from unfeigned lips; and this must be offered only to God, not to angels, nor saints, nor any creature, but to the name of God alone; and it must be by Christ, in a dependence upon his meritorious satisfaction and intercession. 2. The sacrifice of alms-deeds, and Christian charity: To do good, and to communicate, forget now; for with such sacrifices God is well pleased, Heb 13:16. We must, according to our power, communicate to the necessities of the souls and bodies of men; not contenting ourselves to offer the sacrifice of our lips, mere words, but the sacrifice of good deeds; and these we must lay down upon this altar, not depending upon the merit of our good deeds, but of our great high priest; and with such sacrifices as these, adoration and alms thus offered up, God is well pleased; he will accept the offering with pleasure, and will accept and bless the offers through Christ.

2.Having thus told us the duty Christians owe to their deceased ministers, which principally consists in following their faith and not departing from it, the apostle tells us what is the duty that people owe to their living ministers (Heb 13:17) and the reasons of that duty:

(1.)The duty - to obey them, and submit themselves to them. It is not an implicit obedience, or absolute submission, that is here required, but only so far as is agreeable to the mind and will of God revealed in his word; and yet it is truly obedience and submission, and that not only to God, but to the authority of the ministerial office, which is of God as certainly, in all things belonging to that office, as the authority of parents or of civil magistrates in the things within their sphere. Christians must submit to be instructed by their ministers, and not think themselves too wise, too good, or too great, to learn from them; and, when they find that ministerial instructions are agreeable to the written word, they must obey them.

(2.)The motives to this duty.

[1.]They have the rule over the people; their office, though not magisterial, yet is truly authoritative. They have no authority to lord it over the people, but to lead them in the ways of God, by informing and instructing them, explaining the word of God to them, and applying it to their several cases. They are not to make laws of their own, but to interpret the laws of God; nor is their interpretation to be immediately received without examination, but the people must search the scriptures, and so far as the instructions of their minister are according to that rule they ought to receive them, not as the word of men, but, as they are indeed, the word of God, that works effectually in those that believe.

[2.]They watch for the souls of the people, not to ensnare them, but to save them; to gain them, not to themselves, but to Christ; to build them up in knowledge, faith, and holiness. They are to watch against every thing that may be hurtful to the souls of men, and to give them warning of dangerous errors, of the devices of Satan, of approaching judgments; they are to watch for all opportunities of helping the souls of men forward in the way to heaven.

[3.]They must give an account how they have discharged their duty, and what has become of the souls committed to their trust, whether any have been lost through their neglect, and whether any of them have been brought in and built up under their ministry.

[4.]They would be glad to give a good account of themselves and their hearers. If they can then give in an account of their own fidelity and success, it will be a joyful day to them; those souls that have been converted and confirmed under their ministry will be their joy, and their crown, in the day of the Lord Jesus.

[5.]If they give up their account with grief, it will be the people's loss as well as theirs. It is the interest of hearers that the account their ministers give of them may be with joy, and not with grief. If faithful ministers be not successful, the grief will be theirs, but the loss will be the people's. Faithful ministers have delivered their own souls, but a fruitless and faithless people's blood and ruin will be upon their own heads.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Six Centuries of Reception

10 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

10 quotes · AD 373–990
Post-NiceneEarly Medieval
4005006007008009001000

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

AD 373Ephrem the SyrianPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 13
The body of the beasts was an example for our Lord, and our Lord is an example for us, so that “we may go forth outside the camp,” that is, go out and become evangelists of his preaching, “and bear the abuse he endured.”
In the next place he takes away the sacrifice from the type, and directs his discourse to the prototype, saying, "The bodies of those beasts whose blood is brought into the sanctuary by the High Priest, are burned without the camp." Then those things were a type of these and thus Christ, suffering "without," fulfilled all.

Here he makes it plain too that He suffered voluntarily, showing that those things were not accidental, but even the Divine arrangement itself was of a suffering "without." He suffered without, but His Blood was borne up into Heaven. Thou seest then that we partake of Blood which has been carried into the Holy Place, the True Holy Place; of the Sacrifice of which the Priest alone had the privilege. We therefore partake of the Truth, the Reality. If then we partake not of "reproach" only but of sanctification, the "reproach" is the cause of the sanctification. For as He was reproached, so also are we. If we go forth "without" therefore, we have fellowship with Him.
"For the bodies of those beasts whose blood is brought into the sanctuary by the High Priest for sin, are burned without the camp. Wherefore Jesus also, that He might sanctify the people with His own blood, suffered" (he says) "without the gate." Seest thou the type shining forth? "For sin," he says, and "suffered without the gate."
AD 458Theodoret of CyrusPost-NiceneSourceINTERPRETATION OF HEBREWS 13
So let us despise things of this life and look forward to those that are stable and permanent.
AD 458Theodoret of CyrusPost-NiceneSourceINTERPRETATION OF HEBREWS 13
Look at the type, compare it with the reality and perceive the similarity. The law required a red heifer to be sacrificed, and the high priest to take some of its blood and sprinkle the mercy seat seven times with his finger. Burning the heifer itself outside the camp, they took the ashes and with them purified those people called impure. This acted as a type of the saving passion. The word red here means the body from Adam in the Hebrew language. He was fixed to the cross outside the gate. His blood purifies our souls; in place of the dust we have the life giving body.
AD 458Theodoret of CyrusPost-NiceneSourceINTERPRETATION OF HEBREWS 13
“Outside the camp” means, Let our way of life be beyond the law, and let us bear the reproaches for the one who saved us.
AD 461Leo the GreatPost-NiceneSourceSERMON 59.5
“Christ, our paschal lamb, has been sacrificed,” as the apostle says. Offering himself to the Father as a new and real sacrifice of reconciliation, he was crucified—not in the temple whose due worship is now completed, nor within the enclosure of the city which was to be destroyed because of its crime, but “outside the camp.” That way, as the mystery of the ancient sacrifices was ceasing, a new victim would be put on a new altar, and the cross of Christ would be the altar not of the temple, but of the world.
AD 700Isaac of NinevehEarly MedievalSourceASCETICAL HOMILIES 37
The Lord Redeemer very rightly commanded whoever would follow Him to strip himself and leave the world; for a man ought first to cast off from himself the causes of slackness, and then approach the work. When the Lord Himself began to wage war with the devil, He fought him in the arid desert. Paul also exhorts those who take up the cross of Christ to go forth from the city, saying: “Let us go forth unto Him without the city and take up His reproach, for He suffered without the city.” For by setting himself apart from the world and what pertains to it, a man speedily forgets his former habits and his mode of life and he will not struggle long with these. But if he should draw near to the world and its possessions, he will speedily enfeeble the strength of his mind. Wherefore one must know that separation from the world greatly aids a man and guides him on the way of progress in the fierce and saving struggle. It is proper, then, and helpful in this struggle if a monk’s cell be in a poor and mean condition, and if his cell be empty and devoid of everything that could incite in him the desire of ease. For when the causes of slackness are distant from a man, he is not endangered by the twofold warfare, that is, the one which is both inward and outward. See how much easier is the struggle when a man desires things that are afar off than when the very things themselves are close at hand and by their sight inflame the thoughts; for the struggle in the latter case is twofold.
AD 893Photios I of ConstantinopleEarly MedievalSourceFRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 13.10-13
This is spoken to those who would still be at a loss, asking, “How do you say, ‘you have an altar’? For what was offered on it?” It is Christ himself whom you neglect above and below and fail to see that he was sacrificed, since his sacrifice and offering took place for the world, although he himself has not been sacrificed on your altar. For it is manifest that “he suffered outside” the city of Jerusalem. Therefore he says to them, “Yes, he suffered outside, but through this very fact it has rather been accomplished that ‘we have an altar.’ For even among you ‘the bodies’ of the sacrificial victims ‘are burned’ not on the altars themselves, but ‘outside the camp.’ And still for this reason ‘he suffered outside the gate,’ so that he might sanctify all and not merely the priests. And if the sacrifice took place for all, how could it not have been an altar?” But the statement “in order to sanctify the people” gives a different interpretation. He says, “I said that ‘those serving the temple do not have authority to eat’ from our altar, not because this is impossible for them, but because in their opinion they reject themselves as unworthy, since—due to the mercy of Christ—not only is it not forbidden, but for this very reason he once suffered.” He says, “ ‘He suffered outside the gate to sanctify the people,’ not this people or that one but all the people and to grant them to have the authority to eat also from this altar.”
"For the bodies of those animals, whose blood is brought into." Then Paul shows the solemn things among the Jews, being types of our own, and he says that those sacrifices were nothing, of which the people were prevented from partaking; but neither do the high priests of our law partake of our sacrifice; for those were the ones that they typified. Just as in the sacrifices offered for sin, the blood was brought into the holy place by the high priest; the bodies were burned outside the camp; so also Christ, suffering for the sins of the world, brought his own blood into the holy place to the Father as high priest; but his body was crucified outside the city of Jerusalem, because the bodies of the sacrifices for sin were burned outside the camp. Therefore, this blood is brought in by our high priest to our altar. Thus, it is not permitted for the Jewish high priests to eat from that altar.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Hebrews 13:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.