Luke 9:53
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- καὶkaiAndG2532CONJConjunction
- οὐκouknotG3756PRT-NNegative Particle Negative
- ἐδέξαντοedexantothey did receiveG1209V-ADI-3PVerb Aorist Middle Deponent Indicative 3rd Plural
- αὐτὸνautonHimG846P-ASMPersonal pronoun Accusative Singular Masculine
- ὅτιhotibecauseG3754CONJConjunction
- τὸtotheG3588T-NSNDefinite article Nominative Singular Neuter
- πρόσωπονprosōponfaceG4383N-NSNNoun Nominative Singular Neuter
- αὐτοῦautouof HimG846P-GSMPersonal pronoun Genitive Singular Masculine
- ἦνēnwas [as]G1510V-IAI-3SVerb Imperfect Active Indicative 3rd Singular
- πορευόμενονporeuomenongoingG4198V-PNP-NSNVerb Present Middle Or Passive Deponent Participle Nominative Singular Neuter
- εἰςeistowardG1519PREPPreposition
- ἸερουσαλήμIerousalēmJerusalemG2419N-ASF-LNoun Accusative Singular Feminine Location
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
See on the biblical-era maps



Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Luke 9:51–56. He set out his notes in a three-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
This passage of story we have not in any other of the evangelists, and it seems to come in here for the sake of its affinity with that next before, for in this also Christ rebuked his disciples, because they envied for his sake. There, under colour of zeal for Christ, they were for silencing and restraining separatists: here, under the same colour, they were for putting infidels to death; and, as for that, so for this also, Christ reprimanded them, for a spirit of bigotry and persecution is directly contrary to the spirit of Christ and Christianity. Observe here,
I.The readiness and resolution of our Lord Jesus, in prosecuting his great undertaking for our redemption and salvation.
Of this we have an instance, Luke 9:51 : When the time was come that he should be received up, he stedfastly set his face to go to Jerusalem. Observe 1. There was a time fixed for the sufferings and death of our Lord Jesus, and he knew well enough when it was, and had a clear and certain foresight of it, and yet was so far from keeping out of the way that then he appeared most publicly of all, and was most busy, knowing that his time was short. 2. When he saw his death and sufferings approaching, he looked through them and beyond them, to the glory that should follow; he looked upon it as the time when he should be received up into glory (1 Timothy 3:16), received up into the highest heavens, to be enthroned there. Moses and Elias spoke of his death as his departure out of this world, which made it not formidable; but he went further, and looked upon it as his translation to a better world, which made it very desirable. All good Christians may frame to themselves the same notion of death, and may call it their being received up, to be with Christ where he is; and, when the time of their being received up is at hand, let them lift up their heads, knowing that their redemption draws nigh. 3. On this prospect of the joy set before him, he stedfastly set his face to go to Jerusalem the place where he was to suffer and die. He was fully determined to go, and would not be dissuaded; he went directly to Jerusalem, because there now his business lay, and he did not go about to other towns, or fetch a compass, which if he had done, as commonly he did, he might have avoided going through Samaria. He went cheerfully and courageously thither, though he knew the things that should befall him there. He did not fail nor was discouraged, but set his face as a flint, knowing that he should be not only justified, but glorified (Isaiah 50:7), not only not run down, but received up. How should this shame us for, and shame us out of, our backwardness to do and suffer for Christ! We draw back, and turn our faces another way from his service who stedfastly set his face against all opposition, to go through with the work of our salvation.
II.The rudeness of the Samaritans in a certain village (not named, nor deserving to be so) who would not receive him, nor suffer him to bait in their town, though his way lay through it. Observe here,
1.How civil he was to them: He sent messengers before his face, some of his disciples, that went to take up lodgings, and to know whether he might have leave to accommodate himself and his company among them; for he would not come to give offence, or if they took any umbrage at the number of his followers. He sent some to make ready for him, not for state, but convenience, and that his coming might be no surprise.
2.How uncivil they were to him, Luke 9:53. They did not receive him, would not suffer him to come into their village, but ordered their watch to keep him out. He would have paid for all he bespoke, and been a generous guest among them, would have done them good, and preached the gospel to them, as he had done some time ago to another city of the Samaritans, John 4:41. He would have been, if they pleased, the greatest blessing that ever came to their village, and yet they forbid him entrance. Such treatment his gospel and ministers have often met with. Now the reason was because his face was as though he would go to Jerusalem; they observed, by his motions, that he was steering his course that way. The great controversy between the Jews and the Samaritans was about the place of worship - whether Jerusalem or mount Gerizim near Sychar; see John 4:20. And so hot was the controversy between them that the Jews would have no dealings with the Samaritans, nor they with them, John 4:9. Yet we may suppose that they did not deny other Jews lodgings among them, no, not when they went up to the feast; for if that had been their constant practice Christ would not have attempted it, and it would have been a great way about for some of the Galileans to go to Jerusalem any other way than through Samaria. But they were particularly incensed against Christ, who was a celebrated teacher, for owning and adhering to the temple at Jerusalem, when the priests of that temple were such bitter enemies to him, which, they hoped, would have driven him to come and worship at their temple, and bring that into reputation; but when they saw that he would go forward to Jerusalem, notwithstanding this, they would not show him the common civility which probably they used formerly to show him in his journey thither.
III.The resentment which James and John expressed of this affront, Luke 9:54.
When these two heard this message brought, they were all in a flame presently, and nothing will serve them but Sodom's doom upon this village: "Lord," say they, "give us leave to command fire to come down from heaven, not to frighten them only, but to consume them."
1.Here indeed was something commendable, for they showed,
(1.)A great confidence in the power they had received from Jesus Christ; though this had not been particularly mentioned in their commission, yet they could with a word's speaking fetch fire from heaven. Theleis eipōmen - Wilt thou that we speak the word, and the thing will be done.
(2.)A great zeal for the honour of their Master. They took it very ill that he who did good wherever he came and found a hearty welcome should be denied the liberty of the road by a parcel of paltry Samaritans; they could not think of it without indignation that their Master should be thus slighted.
(3.)A submission, notwithstanding, to their Master's good will and pleasure. They will not offer to do such a thing, unless Christ give leave: Wilt thou that we do it?
(4.)A regard to the examples of the prophets that were before them. It is doing as Elias did? they would not have thought of such a thing if Elijah had not done it upon the soldiers that came to take him, once and again, 2 Kings 1:10, 2 Kings 1:12. They thought that this precedent would be their warrant; so apt are we to misapply the examples of good men, and to think to justify ourselves by them in the irregular liberties we give ourselves, when the case is not parallel.
2.But though there was something right in what they said, yet there was much more amiss, for (1.) This was not the first time, by a great many, that our Lord Jesus had been thus affronted, witness the Nazarenes thrusting him out of their city, and the Gadarenes desiring him to depart out of their coast; and yet he never called for any judgment upon them, but patiently put up with the injury. (2.) These were Samaritans, from whom better was not to be expected, and perhaps they had heard that Christ had forbidden his disciples to enter into any of the cities of the Samaritans (Matthew 10:5), and therefore it was not so bad in them as in others who knew more of Christ, and had received so many favours from him. (3.) Perhaps it was only some few of the town that knew any thing of the matter, or that sent that rude message to him, while, for aught they knew, there were many in the town who, if they had heard of Christ's being so near them, would have gone to meet him and welcomed him; and must the whole town be laid in ashes for the wickedness of a few? Will they have the righteous destroyed with the wicked? (4.) Their Master had never yet upon any occasion called for fire from heaven, nay, he had refused to give the Pharisees any sign from heaven when they demanded it (Matthew 16:1, Matthew 16:2); and why should they think to introduce it? James and John were the two disciples whom Christ had called Boanerges - sons of thunder (Mark 3:17); and will not that serve them, but they must be sons of lightning too? (5.) The example of Elias did not reach the case. Elijah was sent to display the terrors of the law, and to give proof of that, and to witness as a bold reprover against the idolatries and wickednesses of the court of Ahab, and it was agreeable enough to him to have his commission thus proved; but it is a dispensation of grace that is now to be introduced, to which such a terrible display of divine justice will not be at all agreeable. Archbishop Tillotson suggests that their being now near Samaria, where Elijah called for fire from heaven, might help to put it in their heads; perhaps at the very place; but, though the place was the same, the times were altered.
IV.The reproof he gave to James and John for their fiery, furious zeal (Luke 9:55):
He turned with a just displeasure, and rebuked them; for as many as he loves he rebukes and chastens, particularly for what they do, that is irregular and unbecoming them, under colour of zeal for him.
1.He shows them in particular their mistake: Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of; that is, (1.) "You are not aware what an evil spirit and disposition you are of; how much there is of pride, and passion, and personal revenge, covered under this pretence of zeal for your Master." Note, There may be much corruption lurking, nay, and stirring too, in the hearts of good people, and they themselves not be sensible of it. (2.) "You do not consider what a good spirit, directly contrary to this, you should be of. Surely you have yet to learn, though you have been so long learning, what the spirit of Christ and Christianity is. Have you not been taught to love your enemies, and to bless them that curse you, and to call for grace from heaven, not fire from heaven, upon them? You know not how contrary your disposition herein is to that which it was the design of the gospel you should be delivered into. You are not now under the dispensation of bondage, and terror, and death, but under the dispensation of love, and liberty, and grace, which was ushered in with a proclamation of peace on earth and good will toward men, to which you ought to accommodate yourselves, and not by such imprecations as these oppose yourselves."
2.He shows them the general design and tendency of his religion (Luke 9:56): The Son of man is not himself come, and therefore does not send you abroad to destroy men's lives, but to save them. He designed to propagate his holy religion by love and sweetness, and every thing that is inviting and endearing, not by fire and sword, and blood and slaughter; by miracles of healing, not by plagues and miracles of destruction, as Israel was brought out of Egypt. Christ came to slay all enmities, not to foster them. Those are certainly destitute of the spirit of the gospel that are for anathematizing and rooting out by violence and persecution all that are not of their mind and way, that cannot in conscience say as they say, and do as they do. Christ came, not only to save men's souls, but to save their lives too - witness the many miracles he wrought for the healing of diseases that would otherwise have been mortal, by which, and a thousand other instances of beneficence, it appears that Christ would have his disciples do good to all, to the utmost of their power, but hurt to none, to draw men into his church with the cords of a man and the bands of love, but not think to drive men into it with a rod of violence or the scourge of the tongue.
V.His retreat from this village.
Christ would not only not punish them for their rudeness, but would not insist upon his right of travelling the road (which was as free to him as to his neighbours), would not attempt to force his way, but quietly and peaceably went to another village, where they were not so stingy and bigoted, and there refreshed himself, and went on his way. Note, When a stream of opposition is strong, it is wisdom to get out of the way of it, rather than to contend with it. If some be very rude, instead of revenging it, we should try whether others will not be more civil.
Historical interpretation
Seven Centuries of Reception
8 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Because it was necessary that the true Lamb should there be offered, where the typical lamb was sacrificed; but it is said, he stedfastly set his face, that is, He went not here and there traversing the villages and towns, but kept on His way straight towards Jerusalem.
(v. Theophyl. in loc.) They thought it much juster that the Samaritans should perish for not admitting our Lord, than the fifty soldiers who tried to thrust down Elijah.
Mark that He was unwilling to be received by those who He knew had not turned to Him with a simple heart. For if He had wished, He might have made them devout, who were undevout. But God calls those whom He thinks worthy, and whom He wills He makes religious. But why they did not receive Him the Evangelist mentions, saying, Because his face was as if he would go to Jerusalem.
For they knew both that when Phineas had slain the idolaters it was counted to him for righteousness; (Numb. 25:8, Ps. 107:31) and that at the prayer of Elijah fire came down from heaven, that the injuries of the prophet might be avenged. (2 Kings 1:10, 12.)
But let him be avenged who fears. He who fears not, seeks not vengeance. At the same time the merits of the Prophets are likewise shown to have been in the Apostles, seeing that they claim to themselves the right of obtaining the same power of which the Prophet was thought worthy; and fitly do they claim that at their command fire should come down from heaven, for they were the sons of thunder.
But the Lord is not moved against them, that He might show that perfect virtue has no feeling of revenge, nor is there any anger where there is fulness of love. For weakness must not be thrust out, but assisted. Let indignation be far from the religious, let the high-souled have no desire of vengeance. Hence it follows, But he turned and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.
For we must not always punish the offender, since mercy sometimes does more good, leading thee to patience, the sinner to repentance. Lastly, those Samaritans believed the sooner, who were in this place saved from fire.
What is the meaning of what is written in the Gospel according to Luke: "And they did not receive him: because his face was going to Jerusalem" (Luke 9:53). Hastening, the Lord went to Jerusalem to fulfill the days of his assumption and to celebrate the Passover, about which he had said: "With desire I have desired to eat this Pasch with you, before I suffer" (Ibid. 22:15), and drink the cup, of which he said: "The cup which my Father hath given me, shall I not drink it?" (John 18:11). He confirmed all his doctrine on the gallows, according to what is written: "And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all things to myself." (Ibid. 12:32). He set his face steadfastly to go to Jerusalem. For it is necessary to have steadfastness and strength for one who is hurrying spontaneously toward passion. Hence to Ezekiel, to whom God had said: Son of man, thou dwellest in the midst of scorpions, and art not afraid of them: I have made thy face strong against their face (Ezekiel 2:6 and 3:9); so that if perchance the hammer of the whole earth had risen up against him, he would be like a most enduring anvil and crush the hammer, of which it is written: "How is the hammer of the whole earth broken and shattered!" (Jeremiah 50:23) And he sent messengers, that is, Angels, before his sight (Luke 9:52). For it was fitting that the Angels should minister to the Son of God. Whether he calls the Apostles Angels, because even John, the precursor of the Lord, was called an Angel (Malachi 3:1; Matthew 11:10). And when they entered a village of the Samaritans, to make ready for him, they did not receive him, because his face was going toward Jerusalem. The Samaritans and Jews are at odds with each other in enmity, and while all nations hate them, they are raging against each other with their own fury, while both contend for possession of the Law, and they persecute one another so much that after the Jews returned from Babylon, the Samaritans always obstructed the building of the Temple. And when even they wanted to build the Temple with them, the Jews replied: It is not lawful for us and you to build the Lord's house (1 Esdr. 4). Finally, for a great injury, the Pharisees reproached the Lord: Do you not have a demon, and are you not a Samaritan? (John 8.48). And in the parable of Jerusalem descending to Jericho, the Samaritan is placed as a sign and a miracle that he did good (Luke 10): and it is written to the Samaritan woman at the well: For Samaritans do not count themselves among the Jews (John 4.9). Therefore, the Samaritans seeing the Lord go towards Jerusalem, that is, to his enemies, as they had heard from his disciples who had come to prepare lodging, recognized him to be a Jew: and, as a Jew and a stranger, and one going to his enemies, they did not want to receive him. Although, with other understanding being submitted to us, it was the will of the Lord not to be received by the Samaritans, because he hastened to go to Jerusalem, where he was to suffer and shed his blood, so that, occupied with Samaritan hospitality and the teaching of that nation, he might not delay the day of suffering to which he had come. Hence he says in another place: "I was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel" (Matthew 15:24). And he commanded the Apostles: "Do not enter the city of Samaria" (Ibid. 10:5), wishing to remove all occasion of Jewish persecution, so that they might not afterwards say, "We have crucified him," because he had joined himself to our enemies and adversaries. Therefore his face was set towards Jerusalem. And accordingly, by another interpretation, the Samaritans did not receive him: for he was hastening to enter Jerusalem. But that they did not receive him, was of the Lord's will. Finally, the Apostles, versed in the Law, in which they knew only justice- an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth- seek to avenge the injury, and to imitate Elijah, at whose word two captains of fifty soldiers were consumed by fire: and they say to the Lord: Wilt thou, we say, that fire should come down from heaven, and consume them? (Luke 9:51). Beautifully, they say, Wilt thou, we say: for even Elijah had said: If I be a man of God, let fire come down from heaven upon thee (2 Kings 1:10). Therefore, for the effectiveness of the speech of the Apostles, it is the will of the Lord. For if He had not commanded it, the Apostles would speak in vain, asking that fire descend upon them, and in other ways. If fire descended from heaven to the injury of Elijah's servants, and consumed the Jews and not the Samaritans, how much more should the flame rage against the impious Samaritans, to the contempt of the Son of God? The Lord, who had come not to judge but to save, not in power but in humility, not in the glory of the Father but in the lowliness of man, rebukes them because they have not remembered His doctrine and the goodness of the Gospel, in which He said: 'If anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also' (Matt. 5:39) and 'Love your enemies' (Luke 6:35).
It also benefited them in another way. They were to be the instructors of the whole world and to travel through the cities and villages, proclaiming everywhere the good tidings of salvation. Of necessity, while seeking to fulfill their mission, they must fall in with wicked people who would reject the divine tidings and not receive Jesus to stay with them.… Christ rebuked them for their own good when they were enraged beyond measure at the hatred of the Samaritans. He did this so they might learn that as ministers of the divine tidings, they must rather be full of longsuffering and gentleness, not revengeful. They must not be given to wrath or savagely attack those who offend them.
When the time was near at hand in which it behoved our Lord to accomplish His life-giving Passion, and ascend up to heaven, He determines to go up to Jerusalem, as it is said, And it came to pass, &c.
And He sends messengers to make a place for Him and His companions, who when they came to the country of the Samaritans were not admitted, as it follows, And sent messengers before his face: and they went, and altered into a village of the Samaritans, to make ready for him. And they did not receive him.
But our Lord, Who knew all things before they came to pass, knowing that His messengers would not be received by the Samaritans, nevertheless commanded them to go before Him, because it was His practice to make all things conduce to the good of His disciples. Now He went up to Jerusalem as the time of His suffering drew near. In order then that they might not be offended, when they saw Him suffer, bearing in mind that they must also endure patiently when men persecute them, He ordained beforehand as a kind of prelude this refusal of the Samaritans. It was good for them also in another way. For they were to be the teachers of the world, going through towns and villages, to preach the doctrine of the Gospel, meeting sometimes with men who would not receive the sacred doctrine, allowing not that Jesus sojourned on earth with them. He therefore taught them, that in announcing the divine doctrine, they ought to be filled with patience and meekness, without bitterness, and wrath, and fierce enmity against those who had done any wrong to them. But as yet they were not so, nay, being stirred up with fervid zeal, they wished to bring down fire from heaven upon them. It follows, And when his disciples James and John saw this, they said, Lord, will thou that we command fire to come down from heaven, &c.
It would be false to affirm that our Savior did not know what was about to happen, because he knows all things. He knew, of course, that the Samaritans would not receive his messengers. There can be no doubt of this. Why then did he command them to go before him? It was his custom to benefit diligently the holy apostles in every possible way, and because of this, it was his practice sometimes to test them.… On this occasion, he also tested them. He knew that the Samaritans would not receive those who went forward to announce that he would stay with them. He still permitted them to go that this again might be a way of benefiting the holy apostles.What was the purpose of this occurrence? He was going up to Jerusalem, as the time of his passion was already drawing near. He was about to endure the scorn of the Jews. He was about to be destroyed by the scribes and Pharisees and to suffer those things that they inflicted upon him when they went to accomplish all of violence and wicked boldness. He did not want them to be offended when they saw him suffering. He also wanted them to be patient and not to complain greatly, although people would treat them rudely. He, so to speak, made the Samaritans’ hatred a preparatory exercise in the matter. They had not received the messengers.…
For their benefit, he rebuked the disciples and gently restrained the sharpness of their wrath, not permitting them to grumble violently against those who sinned. He rather persuaded them to be patient and to cherish a mind that is unmovable by anything like this.
Let then the Heathen cease to mock the Crucified, as if He were a man, who it is plain, as God, both foresaw the time of His crucifixion, and going voluntarily to be crucified, sought with stedfast face, that is, with resolute and undaunted mind, the spot where He was to be crucified.
Or the Samaritans see that our Lord is going to Jerusalem, and do not receive Him. For the Jews have no dealings with the Samaritans, (John 4:9.) as John shows.
For holy men who well knew that that death which detaches the soul from the body was not to be feared, still because of their feelings who feared it, punished some sins with death, that both the living might be struck with a wholesome dread, and those who were punished with death might receive harm not from death itself but from sin, which would be increased were they to live.
The Lord blames them, not for following the example of the holy Prophet, but for their ignorance in taking vengeance while they were yet inexperienced, perceiving that they did not desire correction from love, but vengeance from hatred. After that He had taught them what it was to love their neighbour as themselves, and the Holy Ghost also had been infused into them, there were not lacking these punishments, though far less frequent than in the Old Testament, because the Son of man came not to destroy men's lives, but to save them. As if He said, And do you therefore who are sealed with His Spirit, imitate also His actions, now determining charitably, hereafter judging justly.
But if one understands that they did not receive Him for this reason, because He had determined to go to Jerusalem, an excuse is found for them, who did not receive Him. But we must say, that in the words of the Evangelist, And they did not receive him, is implied that He did not go into Samaria, but afterwards as if some one had asked St. Luke, he explained in these words, why they did not receive Him. And He went not to them, i. e. not that He was unable, but that He did not wish to go there, but rather to Jerusalem.
Continue studying Luke 9:53 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
The Samaritan villagers refuse to welcome Jesus because he is plainly on his way to Jerusalem, the rival of their own place of worship.
“And they did not receive him,”
Déchomai, to receive or welcome. The villagers refused hospitality to Jesus and his company.
“because his face was as though he would go to Jerusalem.”
Prósōpon with poreúomai, “to go”, and Hierousalḗm, Jerusalem. His purpose was plain to see, and to Samaritans who worshipped on Gerizim it meant siding with their rival.
Jesus Sets His Face Toward Jerusalem
Luke 9:51–56
Summary
The time is drawing near for Jesus to be received up into heaven, and he “stedfastly set his face to go to Jerusalem”, the city where his suffering, death, resurrection and ascension wait for him. He sends messengers ahead into a village of the Samaritans to make ready for him, and the villagers refuse to receive him because he is plainly bound for Jerusalem. James and John ask whether they should call down fire from heaven on the village, as Elijah did. Jesus turns and rebukes them, saying that the Son of man came to save men’s lives, and the whole company goes on to another village. In six verses we see the Lord’s resolve to go to the cross for us, the refusal he meets on the way, and the patient mercy that marks his coming.
A turning point: the road to Jerusalem begins
“And it came to pass” translates egeneto de, a phrase Luke often uses to open a new and important development, and this one turns the whole Gospel. Until now Jesus has worked mainly in Galilee and the regions around it. From this verse Luke follows him on the way to Jerusalem, in a long section often called the Travel Narrative (Luke 9:51–19:27), and much of his teaching in Luke, with many of his parables, is given on this road. Every word of it is spoken by a man who knows where the road ends.
The verse follows closely on the Transfiguration (Luke 9:28–36). On the mountain Moses and Elijah appeared with Jesus in glory and “spake of his decease which he should accomplish at Jerusalem” (Luke 9:31). The Greek word behind “decease” is exodos, his departure, which takes in his death, resurrection and ascension together. With that path confirmed from heaven, Jesus now sets out to accomplish it.
“When the time was come that he should be received up”
Luke’s word behind “time” is hēméra, “day”, used here of an appointed period. The days God had set were running their course, and everything that would happen in Jerusalem belonged to his plan.
“Received up” translates análēpsis, a noun from a verb meaning “to take up”, and it names his ascension. Luke tells of that day in Acts: “while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight” (Acts 1:9–11). Here the word gathers up the whole of what lay ahead, his Passion, crucifixion and resurrection as well as his return to the Father, because all of it was the way to his glory. John speaks of the same moment: “when Jesus knew that his hour was come that he should depart out of this world unto the Father, having loved his own which were in the world, he loved them unto the end” (John 13:1).
What it means that he “stedfastly set his face”
The verb stērízō comes from a root meaning “to set fast”, and it means to make firm, establish or fix. Jesus, quite literally, made his face firm. Prósōpon is the front of something: the face, the countenance, a person’s presence. Together they make the Hebraism “to set one’s face”, a way of speaking that comes from the Old Testament prophets, and it means a firm resolve to go somewhere whatever stands in the way. The Servant of the Lord says in Isaiah, “For the Lord GOD will help me; therefore shall I not be confounded: therefore have I set my face like a flint, and I know that I shall not be ashamed” (Isaiah 50:7). Jesus is that Servant, and his face is set the same way.
He went knowing what waited for him. Later on this road he takes the twelve aside and tells them that in Jerusalem he will be delivered to the Gentiles, mocked, scourged and put to death, and that he will rise again on the third day (Luke 18:31–33). Jerusalem was the heart of Israel’s worship, the city of the Temple and the focus of the people’s hopes for the Messiah. It was also where opposition to Jesus was fiercest, and where prophets had been rejected and killed. Jesus says so himself: “it cannot be that a prophet perish out of Jerusalem” (Luke 13:33). He goes up to the city as the Passover lambs went up, to be sacrificed.
His resolve is obedience to the Father and love for us. Paul says that Christ “humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross” (Philippians 2:5–8). Hebrews looks to Jesus, “who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame” (Hebrews 12:2), and says that being made perfect “he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him” (Hebrews 5:9). The road Jesus sets out on here is the road of our redemption.
Messengers sent into a village of the Samaritans
Jesus prepares for the journey in a plain, practical way. He “sent messengers before his face”, that is, ahead of him. The word is ángelos, from a verb meaning “to bring tidings”. It is also the word for an angel, and here it means human messengers sent on ahead to announce his coming, much as John the Baptist went before him to prepare his way. They “entered”, eisérchomai, “to go in”, a Samaritan village “to make ready for him”. Hetoimázō means to prepare, and here that meant practical arrangements such as lodging, food and a place to rest. The Son of God travelled with a company of followers who needed somewhere to eat and sleep, and he planned for it. Jesus later sends out the seventy in the same manner, “two and two before his face into every city and place, whither he himself would come” (Luke 10:1).
The striking thing is where he sent them. Many Jews kept away from Samaria altogether, and Jesus sent his messengers straight into a Samaritan village to ask for a welcome. He had already spoken openly with the Samaritan woman at the well and ministered to her (John 4:4–42).
Why the Samaritans refused to receive him
The quarrel between Jews and Samaritans was centuries old. The Samaritans descended from Israelites of the northern kingdom who intermarried with foreign settlers after the Assyrian conquest in 722 BC. Like the Jews they traced their line to Jacob and held to the law of Moses, but they worshipped on Mount Gerizim, where they had their own temple, and set aside much of the rest of the Jewish Scriptures. Jews regarded them as heretics and half-breeds whose worship was illegitimate, and many Jews travelling between Galilee and Judea took a longer route through Perea to avoid Samaria. The Samaritan woman put it plainly: “the Jews have no dealings with the Samaritans” (John 4:9).
So when the villagers “did not receive him”, they refused him hospitality, shelter and passage. Déchomai means to receive or accept, and to welcome a guest, and turning travellers away was a serious breach of the welcome expected in Israel. Luke gives the reason: “his face was as though he would go to Jerusalem”. The same word, prósōpon, stands here as in verse 51, joined to poreúomai, “to go” or “to travel”. His face was set toward the city, and they saw it. To them a Jew bound for Jerusalem, the rival centre of worship, was taking Jerusalem’s side against Gerizim, so they turned him away.
This is the first refusal Jesus meets on the road, and it looks ahead to the greater rejection waiting for him in Jerusalem, which would end at the cross. Isaiah had foretold it of the Servant: “He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief” (Isaiah 53:3–7).
Why James and John asked to call down fire
James and John “saw” the refusal, eídō, the ordinary verb for seeing. These are the brothers Jesus had named Boanerges, “The sons of thunder” (Mark 3:17), a name that likely reflected their fiery and impetuous temper, and this request shows it. They call Jesus “Lord” and ask “wilt thou”, with thélō, “to will” or “to wish”, so they recognise his authority and want his leave. What they want leave to do is to “consume” the village. Analískō comes from a root meaning “to use up”, and it means to destroy utterly, to make an end of something.
“Even as Elias did” points to a story they all knew. Hēlías is the Greek form of Elijah’s name. When King Ahaziah sent a captain with fifty soldiers to take the prophet, Elijah answered, “If I be a man of God, then let fire come down from heaven, and consume thee and thy fifty”, and the fire fell, and fell again on a second company (2 Kings 1:9–12). To James and John the village’s refusal was an insult to their Lord and an affront to God, and Elijah gave them a precedent for answering it.
Their request also shows what they still expected. Many Jews of their day longed for a Messiah who would free Israel from Rome, restore David’s kingdom and bring swift judgment on Israel’s enemies. Even his closest disciples were still learning that he came as the suffering Servant, “to seek and to save that which was lost” (Luke 19:10). Their zeal for his honour was real, and it ran ahead of wisdom.
Jesus turned and rebuked them
“But he turned, and rebuked them.” Jesus faces them and answers at once. Epitimáō means to express strong disapproval, or to give a command with a threat behind it, and Jesus uses that firmness against the very wish to destroy.
His words go beneath the request to its source: “Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.” The verb for “know” is eídō, the same verb Luke used for “saw” in verse 54. Strong’s calls it a primary verb, properly “to see”, and in this form it means to know. Pneûma is breath or wind, and by extension a spirit. Here it means the inner disposition that drives what a person says and does. James and John thought they were zealous for God, and in fact anger at being refused and a wish for retribution were driving them. They were strangers to their own hearts, and they had yet to learn the spirit that belongs to those who follow Jesus, the Spirit of God, who brings love, patience and a longing to save.
Why would Jesus refuse to do what Elijah did?
Jesus came, at his first coming, to save, and he says so in the next breath: “For the Son of man is not come to destroy men’s lives, but to save them.” John says the same of the Father’s purpose in sending him: “For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved” (John 3:17). Elijah’s fire was God’s judgment on an idolatrous king and the soldiers sent to seize his prophet, and it was right in its place. Jesus has come in the time of God’s patience, when the Lord is “not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance” (2 Peter 3:9).
Jesus does speak of fire: “I am come to send fire on the earth” (Luke 12:49). The fire he brings is the purifying work of the Holy Spirit and the judgment of sin, which fell on him at the cross. For those who reject him he has a different word. He taught his followers, “Love your enemies, bless them that curse you” (Matthew 5:44), and Paul tells believers to leave judgment to God, who says, “Vengeance is mine; I will repay” (Romans 12:19). Peter writes of Christ that “when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed himself to him that judgeth righteously” (1 Peter 2:23). On the cross, with his enemies around him, Jesus prayed, “Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do” (Luke 23:34). That is the spirit he was teaching James and John, and it is God’s own: “God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8).
The Son of man came to save men’s lives
“For”, gár, gives the reason for the rebuke. “Son of man”, huiós tou ánthrōpou, joins huiós, “son”, and ánthrōpos, “man” or “human being”. It is the name Jesus used for himself most often. It speaks of his true humanity, and it also recalls Daniel’s vision of “one like the Son of man” who came with the clouds of heaven and was given “dominion, and glory, and a kingdom” (Daniel 7:13–14). The one who holds that authority uses it to save.
“Is come” is érchomai, to come or go, and here it speaks of the reason for his whole coming among us. “Destroy” is apóllymi, built from apó and the base of ólethros, and it means to destroy fully, to perish or to lose. Luke uses it of the sheep that is lost and then found (Luke 15:4). “Lives” is psychḗ, breath, the life that animates a person. “But” is allá, which marks a strong contrast, and “save” is sṓzō, to save, deliver, preserve, rescue or heal. It covers deliverance of every kind, from the salvation of the soul to the healing of the body and rescue from danger.
The line sums up Jesus’ whole purpose. Paul says, “Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners” (1 Timothy 1:15), and Jesus says, “I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly” (John 10:10). He is “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29), and through him God has reconciled us to himself (2 Corinthians 5:18–19). The one who refused to destroy the Samaritans went on to Jerusalem and let himself be put to death there, so that sinners might live.
Why do some Bibles leave out these words?
The words from “For the Son of man” to “save them” stand in later Greek manuscripts, which the KJV follows, while the earliest manuscripts, such as Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus, lack them. For that reason the ESV and NIV leave them out of the text. They may have been added by a scribe, to make Jesus’ purpose plain after the disciples’ request or to match sayings found elsewhere, such as “For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost” (Matthew 18:11) and John 3:17. Those who weigh the manuscripts generally prefer the shorter reading, because scribes were more likely to add words than to drop them. Whichever reading is original, what the words say is taught throughout the New Testament, and Luke records Jesus saying the same thing in Luke 19:10.
They went on to another village
“And they went to another village.” Luke uses poreúomai here, the same verb he used in verse 53 for Jesus’ going to Jerusalem, and the journey simply goes on. Kaí, “and”, joins this quiet ending to Jesus’ words. Eis is “to”, héteros is “another”, and kṓmē is “village”. Jesus leaves the Samaritan village in peace and carries his mission elsewhere, and the moving on is itself the lesson he has just taught. He is patient with those who turned him away, as the LORD has always been: “The LORD is merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and plenteous in mercy” (Psalm 103:8).
What this road shows of Christ
This short scene holds the shape of the gospel. Jesus sets his face toward the city where he will be rejected and killed, and he goes because he loves the people he came to save. On the way he is refused by people his own nation despised, and he answers them with patience and keeps walking toward the cross that would be for them too.
The village that shut its door on him stayed within reach of his mercy. After his resurrection he sent his disciples to be his witnesses “both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth” (Acts 1:8), and Acts 8 tells how the gospel was preached in Samaria. His command to “teach all nations” (Matthew 28:19) takes in every people. Christ “is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us” (Ephesians 2:14), so that “ye are all one in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:28), and God’s purpose is to “gather together in one all things in Christ” (Ephesians 1:10).
The rebuke of James and John was mercy as well. The Lord corrected them and took them on with him to the next village, still teaching them the spirit of his kingdom. When we are wronged and want to see our opponents punished, these verses set before us the Son of man, who came to save men’s lives and who prayed for the men who crucified him.
Luke 9:51
“And it came to pass,”
Luke’s egeneto de, his usual way of opening an important new development. Here it opens the long journey to Jerusalem.
“when the time was come”
The appointed days, hēméra, were running their course. God set the timing of all that followed.
“that he should be received up,”
Análēpsis, his being taken up into heaven, with the suffering, death and resurrection that led to it.
“he stedfastly set his face”
In Luke’s Greek, estērixen to prosōpon autou: stērízō, “to make firm”, with prósōpon, “face”. The Hebraism means fixed resolve, as in “I set my face like a flint” (Isaiah 50:7).
“to go to Jerusalem,”
The city of the Temple, where the prophets were rejected and where Jesus would suffer, die and rise again.
Luke 9:52
“And sent messengers before his face:”
Ángelos, the word also used for angels, here means men sent ahead to announce him.
“and they went, and entered”
Eisérchomai, “to go in”. The messengers did what they were sent to do.
“into a village of the Samaritans,”
Samaria lay between Galilee and Judea, and many Jews avoided it. Jesus sent his messengers straight in.
“to make ready for him.”
Hetoimázō, to prepare: lodging, food and rest for Jesus and those travelling with him.
Luke 9:53 This verse
“And they did not receive him,”
Déchomai, to receive or welcome. The villagers refused hospitality to Jesus and his company.
“because his face was as though he would go to Jerusalem.”
Prósōpon with poreúomai, “to go”, and Hierousalḗm, Jerusalem. His purpose was plain to see, and to Samaritans who worshipped on Gerizim it meant siding with their rival.
Luke 9:54
“And when his disciples James and John saw this,”
Eídō, to see. The two brothers Jesus called “sons of thunder” (Mark 3:17) watched the refusal.
“they said, Lord, wilt thou”
Thélō, to will or wish. They ask for his permission, and so they honour his authority even in their anger.
“that we command fire to come down from heaven,”
They borrow Elijah’s words, “let fire come down from heaven” (2 Kings 1:9–12).
“and consume them,”
Analískō, to use up or destroy utterly. They wanted the village wiped out.
“even as Elias did?”
Hēlías, the Greek form of Elijah, the prophet whose fire fell on the king’s soldiers.
Luke 9:55
“But he turned, and rebuked them,”
Epitimáō, strong disapproval. Jesus turns to face them and stops the request at once.
“and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.”
Eídō again, here “to know”, and pneûma, spirit. Their anger came from a spirit foreign to his, and they had yet to see it in themselves.
Luke 9:56
“For the Son of man is not come”
Gár, “for”, gives the reason. Huiós tou ánthrōpou is the name Jesus used for himself most often, and érchomai speaks of his coming into the world.
“to destroy men’s lives,”
Apóllymi, to destroy fully or lose, with psychḗ, life, of ánthrōpos, men.
“but to save them.”
Allá, “but”, and sṓzō, to save, rescue and heal. These words are missing from the earliest manuscripts, and their truth stands throughout Scripture (Luke 19:10).
“And they went to another village.”
Kaí, poreúomai, eis, héteros and kṓmē: “and they went to another village”. Jesus moves on in peace, and the journey to Jerusalem continues.
Last revised