TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Luke 22:21–38. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
We have here Christ's discourse with his disciples after supper, much of which is new here; and in St. John's gospel we shall find other additions. We should take example from him to entertain and edify our family and friends with such discourse at table as is good and to the use of edifying, which may minister grace to the hearers; but especially after we have been at the Lord's table, by Christian conference to keep one another in a suitable frame. The matters Christ here discoursed of were of weight, and to the present purpose.
I.He discoursed with them concerning him that should betray him, who was now present.
1.He signifies to them that the traitor was now among them, and one of them, Luk 22:21. By placing this after the institution of the Lord's supper, though in Matthew and Mark it is placed before it, it seems plain that Judas did receive the Lord's supper, did eat of that bread and drink of that cup; for, after the solemnity was over, Christ said, Behold, the hand of him that betrayeth me is with me on the table. There have been those that have eaten bread with Christ and yet have betrayed him.
2.He foretels that the treason would take effect (Luk 22:22): Truly the Son of man goes as it was determined, goes to the place where he will be betrayed; for he is delivered up by the counsel and foreknowledge of God, else Judas could not have delivered him up. Christ was not driven to his sufferings, but cheerfully went to them. He said, Lo, I come.
3.He threatens the traitor: Woe to that man by whom he is betrayed. Note, Neither the patience of the saints under their sufferings, nor the counsel of God concerning their sufferings, will be any excuse for those that have any hand in their sufferings, or that persecute them. Though God has determined that Christ shall be betrayed and he himself has cheerfully submitted to it, yet Judas's sin or punishment is not at all the less.
4.He frightens the rest of the disciples into a suspicion of themselves, by saying that it was one of them, and not naming which (Luk 22:23): They began to enquire among themselves, to interrogate themselves, to put the question to themselves, who it was that should do this thing, that could be so base to so good a Master. The enquiry was not, Is it you? or, Is it such a one? but, Is it I?
II.Concerning the strife that was among them for precedency or supremacy.
1.See what the dispute was: Which of them should be accounted the greatest. Such and so many contests among the disciples for dignity and dominion, before the Spirit was poured upon them, were a sad presage of the like strifes for, and affections of, supremacy in the churches, after the Spirit should be provoked to depart from them. How inconsistent is this with that in the verse before! There they were enquiring which would be the traitor, and here which should be the prince. Could such an instance of humility, and such an instance of pride and vanity, be found in the same men, so near together? This is like sweet waters and bitter proceeding at the same time out of the same fountain. What a self-contradiction is the deceitful heart of man!
2.See what Christ said to this dispute. He was not sharp upon them, as might have been expected (he having so often reproved them for this very thing), but mildly showed them the sin and folly of it.
(1.)This was to make themselves like the kings of the Gentiles, who affect worldly pomp, and worldly power, Luk 22:25. They exercise lordship over their subjects, and are ever and anon striving to exercise lordship too over the princes that are about them, though as good as themselves, if they think them not so strong as themselves. Note, The exercising of lordship better becomes the kings of the Gentiles than the ministers of Christ. But observe, They that exercise authority, and take upon themselves to bear sway, and give law, they are called Benefactors - Euergetas, they call themselves so, and so their flatterers call them, and those that set themselves to serve their interests. It is pretended that they have been benefactors, and upon that account they should be admitted to have rule; nay, that in exercising authority they are benefactors. However they may really serve themselves, they would be thought to serve their country. One of the Ptolemies was surnamed Euergetes - The Benefactor. Now our Saviour, by taking notice of this, intimates,
[1.]That to do good is much more honourable than to look great; for these princes that were the terror of the mighty would not be called so, but rather the benefactors of the needy; so that, by their own confession, a benefactor to his country is much more valued than a ruler of his country.
[2.]That to do good is the surest way to be great, else they that aimed to be rulers would not have been so solicitous to be called Benefactors. This therefore he would have his disciples believe, that their greatest honour would be to do all the good they could in the world. They would indeed be benefactors to the world, by bringing the gospel to it. Let them value themselves upon that title, which they would indeed be entitled to, and then they need not strive which should be the greatest, for they would all be greater - greater blessings to mankind than the kings of the earth, that exercise lordship over them. If they have that which is confessedly the greater honour, of being benefactors, let them despise the less, of being rulers.
(2.)It was to make themselves unlike the disciples of Christ, and unlike Christ himself: "You shall not be so," Luk 22:26, Luk 22:27. "It was never intended that you should rule any otherwise than by the power of truth and grace, but that you should serve." When church-rulers affect external pomp and power, and bear up themselves by secular interests and influences, they debase their office, and it is an instance of degeneracy like that of Israel when they would have a king like the nations that were round about them, whereas the Lord was their King. See here,
[1.]What is the rule Christ gave to his disciples: He that is greater among you, that is senior, to whom precedency is due upon the account of his age, let him be as the younger, both in point of lowness of place (let him condescend to sit with the younger, and be free and familiar with them) and in point of labour and work. We say, Juniores ad labores, seniores ad honores - Let the young work, and the aged receive their honours. But let the elder take pains as well as the younger; their age and honour, instead of warranting them to take their ease, bind them to double work. And he that is chief, ho hēgoumenos - the president of the college or assembly, let him be as he that serves, hōs ho diakonōn - as the deacon; let him stoop to the meanest and most toilsome services for the public good, if there be occasion.
[2.]What was the example which he himself gave to this rule: Whether is greater, he that sitteth at meat or he that serveth? he that attendeth or he that is attended on? Now Christ was among his disciples just like one that waited at table. He was so far from taking state, or taking his ease, by commanding their attendance upon him, that he was ready to do any office of kindness and service for them; witness his washing their feet. Shall those take upon them the form of princes who call themselves followers of him that took upon him the form of a servant?
(3.)They ought not to strive for worldly honour and grandeur, because he had better honours in reserve for them, of another nature, a kingdom, a feast, a throne, for each of them, wherein they should all share alike, and should have no occasion to strive for precedency, Luk 22:28-30. Where observe,
[1.]Christ's commendation of his disciples for their faithfulness to him; and this was honour enough for them, they needed not to strive for any greater. It is spoken with an air of encomium and applause: "You are they who have continued with me in my temptations, you are they who have stood by me and stuck to me when others have deserted me and turned their backs upon me." Christ had his temptations; he was despised and rejected of men, reproached and reviled, and endured the contradiction of sinners. But his disciples continued with him, and were afflicted in all his afflictions. It was but little help that they could give him, or service that they could do him; nevertheless, he took it kindly that they continued with him, and he here owns their kindness, though it was by the assistance of his own grace that they did continue. Christ's disciples had been very defective in their duty. We find them guilty of many mistakes and weaknesses: they were very dull and very forgetful, and often blundered, yet their Master passes all by and forgets it; he does not upbraid them with their infirmities, but gives them this memorable testimonial, You are they who have continued with me. Thus does he praise at parting, to show how willing he is to make the best of those whose hearts he knows to be upright with him.
[2.]The recompence he designed them for their fidelity: I appoint, diatithemai, I bequeath, unto you a kingdom. Or thus, I appoint to you, as my Father has appointed a kingdom to me, that you may eat and drink at my table. Understand it, First, Of what should be done for them in this world. God gave his Son a kingdom among men, the gospel church, of which he is the living, quickening, ruling, Head. This kingdom he appointed to his apostles and their successors in the ministry of the gospel, that they should enjoy the comforts and privileges of the gospel, help to communicate them to others by gospel ordinances, sit on thrones as officers of the church, not only declaratively, but exhortatively judging the tribes of Israel that persist in their infidelity, and denouncing the wrath of God against them, and ruling the gospel Israel, the spiritual Israel, by the instituted discipline of the church, administered with gentleness and love. This is the honour reserved for you. Or, Secondly, Of what should be done for them in the other world, which I take to be chiefly meant. Let them go on in their services in this world; their preferments shall be in the other world. God will give them the kingdom, in which they shall be sure to have, 1. The richest dainties; for they shall eat and drink at Christ's table in his kingdom, of which he had spoken, Luk 22:16, Luk 22:18. They shall partake of those joys and pleasures which were the recompence of his services and sufferings. They shall have a full satisfaction of soul in the vision and fruition of God; and herein they shall have the best society, as at a feast, in the perfection of love. 2. The highest dignities: "You shall not only be provided for at the royal table, as Mephibosheth at David's, but you shall be preferred to the royal throne; shall sit down with me on my throne, Rev 3:21. In the great day you shall sit on thrones, as assessors with Christ, to approve of and applaud his judgment of the twelve tribes of Israel." If the saints shall judge the world (Co1 6:2), much more the church.
III.Concerning Peter's denying him. And in this part of the discourse we may observe,
1.The general notice Christ gives to Peter of the devil's design upon him and the rest of the apostles (Luk 22:31): The Lord said, Simon, Simon, observe what I say; Satan hath desired to have you, to have you all in his hands, that he may sift you as wheat. Peter, who used to be the mouth of the rest in speaking to Christ, is here made the ear of the rest; and what is designed for warning to them all (all you shall be offended, because of me) is directed to Peter, because he was principally concerned, being in particular manner struck at by the tempter: Satan has desired to have you. Probably Satan had accused the disciples to God as mercenary in following Christ, and aiming at nothing else therein but enriching and advancing themselves in this world, as he accused Job. "No," saith God, "they are honest men, and men of integrity." "Give me leave to try them," saith Satan, "and Peter particularly." He desired to have them, that he might sift them, that he might show them to be chaff, and not wheat. The troubles that were now coming upon them were sifting, would try what there was in them: but this was not all; Satan desired to sift them by his temptations, and endeavoured by those troubles to draw them into sin, to put them into a loss and hurry, as corn when it is sifted to bring the chaff uppermost, or rather to shake out the wheat and leave nothing but the chaff. Observe, Satan could not sift them unless God gave him leave: He desired to have them, as he begged of God a permission to try and tempt Job. Exētēsato - "He has challenged you, has undertaken to prove you a company of hypocrites, and Peter especially, the forwardest of you." Some suggest that Satan demanded leave to sift them as their punishment for striving who should be greatest, in which contest Peter perhaps was very warm: "Leave them to me, to sift them for it."
2.The particular encouragement he gave to Peter, in reference to this trial: "I have prayed for thee, because, though he desires to have them all, he is permitted to make his strongest onset upon thee only: thou wilt be most violently assaulted, but I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not, that it may not totally and finally fail." Note,
(1.)If faith be kept up in an hour of temptation, though we may fall, yet we shall not be utterly cast down. Faith will quench Satan's fiery darts.
(2.)Though there may be many failings in the faith of true believers, yet there shall not be a total and final failure of their faith. It is their seed, their root, remaining in them.
(3.)It is owing to the mediation and intercession of Jesus Christ that the faith of his disciples, though sometimes sadly shaken, yet is not sunk. If they were left to themselves, they would fail; but they are kept by the power of God and the prayer of Christ. The intercession of Christ is not only general, for all that believe, but for particular believers (I have prayed for thee), which is an encouragement for us to pray for ourselves, and an engagement upon us to pray for others too.
3.The charge he gives to Peter to help others as he should himself be helped of God: "When thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren; when thou art recovered by the grace of God, and brought to repentance, do what thou canst to recover others; when thou hast found they faith kept from failing, labour to confirm the faith of others, and to establish them; when thou hast found mercy with God thyself, encourage others to hope that they also shall find mercy." Note,
(1.)Those that have fallen into sin must be converted from it; those that have turned aside must return; those that have left their first love must do their first works.
(2.)Those that through grace are converted from sin must do what they can to strengthen their brethren that stand, and to prevent their falling; see Psa 51:11-13; Ti1 1:13.
4.Peter's declared resolution to cleave to Christ, whatever it cost him (Luk 22:33): Lord, I am ready to go with thee, both into prison and to death. This was a great word, and yet I believe no more than he meant at this time, and thought he should make good too. Judas never protested thus against denying Christ, though often warned of it; for his heart was as fully set in him to the evil as Peter's was against it. Note, All the true disciples of Christ sincerely desire and design to follow him, whithersoever he goes, and whithersoever he leads them, though into a prison, though out of the world.
5.Christ's express prediction of his denying him thrice (Luk 22:34): "I tell thee, Peter (thou dost not know thine own heart, but must be left to thyself a little, that thou mayest know it, and mayest never trust to it again), the cock shall not crow this day before thou even deny that thou knowest me." Note, Christ knows us better than we know ourselves, and knows the evil that is in us, and will be done by us, which we ourselves do not suspect. It is well for us that Christ knows where we are weak better than we do, and therefore where to come in with grace sufficient; that he knows how far a temptation will prevail, and therefore when to say, Hitherto shall it come, and no further.
IV.Concerning the condition of all the disciples.
1.He appeals to them concerning what had been, Luk 22:35. He had owned that they had been faithful servants to him, Luk 22:28. Now he expects, at parting, that they should acknowledge that he had been a kind and careful Master to them ever since they left all to follow him: When I sent you without purse, lacked you any thing?
(1.)He owns that he had sent them out in a very poor and bare condition, barefoot, and with no money in their purses, because they were not to go far, nor be out long; and he would thus teach them to depend upon the providence of God, and, under that, upon the kindness of their friends. If God thus send us out into the world, let us remember that better than we have thus begun low.
(2.)Yet ye will have them own that, notwithstanding this, they had lacked nothing; they then lived as plentifully and comfortably as ever; and they readily acknowledged it: "Nothing, Lord; I have all, and abound." Note,
[1.]It is good for us often to review the providences of God that have been concerning us all our days, and to observe how we have got through the straits and difficulties we have met with.
[2.]Christ is a good Master, and his service a good service; for though his servants may sometimes be brought low, yet he will help them; and though he try them, yet will he not leave them. Jehovah-jireh.
[3.]We must reckon ourselves well done by, and must not complain, but be thankful, if we have had the necessary supports of life, though we have had neither dainties nor superfluities, though we have lived from hand to mouth, and lived upon the kindness of our friends. The disciples lived upon contribution, and yet did not complain that their maintenance was precarious, but owned, to their Master's honour, that it was sufficient; they had wanted nothing.
2.He gives them notice of a very great change of their circumstances now approaching. For,
(1.)He that was their Master was now entering upon his sufferings, which he had often foretold (Luk 22:37): "Now that which is written must be fulfilled in me, and this among the rest, He was numbered among the transgressors - he must suffer and die as a malefactor, and in company with some of the vilest of malefactors. This is that which is yet to be accomplished, after all the rest, and then the things concerning me, the things written concerning me, will have an end; then I shall say, It is finished." Note, It may be the comfort of suffering Christians, as it was of a suffering Christ, that their sufferings were foretold, and determined in the counsels of heaven, and will shortly determine in the joys of heaven. They were written concerning them, and they will have an end, and will end well, everlastingly well.
(2.)They must therefore expect troubles, and must not think now to have such an easy and comfortable life as they had had; no, the scene will alter. They must now in some degree suffer with their Master; and, when he is gone, they must expect to suffer like him. The servant is not better than his Lord.
[1.]They must not now expect that their friends would be so kind and generous to them as they had been; and therefore, He that has a purse, let him take it, for he may have occasion for it, and for all the good husbandry he can use.
[2.]They must now expect that their enemies would be more fierce upon them than they had been, and they would need magazines as well as stores: He that has no sword wherewith to defend himself against robbers and assassins (Co2 11:26) will find a great want of it, and will be ready to wish, some time or other, that he had sold his garment and bought one. This is intended only to show that the times would be very perilous, so that no man would think himself safe if he had not a sword by his side. But the sword of the Spirit is the sword which the disciples of Christ must furnish themselves with. Christ having suffered for us, we must arm ourselves with the same mind (Pe1 4:1), arm ourselves with an expectation of trouble, that it may not be a surprise to us, and with a holy resignation to the will of God in it, that there may be no opposition in us to it: and then we are better prepared than if we had sold a coat to buy a sword. The disciples hereupon enquire what strength they had, and find they had among them two swords (Luk 22:38), of which one was Peter's. The Galileans generally travelled with swords. Christ wore none himself, but he was not against his disciples' wearing them. But he intimates how little he would have them depend upon this when he saith, It is enough, which some think is spoken ironically: "Two swords among twelve men! you are bravely armed indeed when our enemies are now coming out against us in great multitudes, and every one with a sword!" Yet two swords are sufficient for those who need none, having God himself to be the shield of their help and the sword of their excellency, Deu 33:29.
Historical interpretation
Nine Centuries of Reception
13 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
The devil also asked for power to tempt the apostles, since he did not have it except with divine permission. In the Gospel, the Lord said to Peter, “Behold, Satan has desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat; but I have prayed for you, that your faith may not fail.” That is to say, the devil could not have so much power as to be able to endanger the faith of Peter. We thus see that the threat to our faith as well as its protection are in the power of God.
For in the case of Peter, too, he gives you proof that he is a jealous God, when he destined the apostle, after his presumptuous protestations of zeal, to a flat denial of him, rather than prevent his fall. The Christ of the prophets was destined, moreover, to be betrayed with a kiss, for He was the Son indeed of Him who was "honoured with the lips" by the people.
(in Reg. Brev. ad int. 8.) We must know then, that God sometimes allows the rash to receive a fall, as a remedy to previous self-confidence. But although the rash man seems to have committed the same offence with other men, there is no slight difference. For the one has sinned by reason of certain secret assaults and almost against his will, but the others, having no care either for themselves or God, knowing no distinction between sin and virtuous actions. For the rash needing some assistance, in regard to this very thing in which he has sinned ought to suffer reproof. But the others, having destroyed all the good of their soul, must be afflicted, warned, rebuked, or made subject to punishment, until they acknowledge that God is a just Judge, and tremble.
And every one vehemently affirming that they would not forsake Him, I Peter adding this promise, that I would even die with Him, He said, "Verily I say unto thee, Before the cock crows, thou shall thrice deny that thou knowest me."
Beware then of boasting, beware of the world; he is commanded to strengthen his own brethren, who said, Master, we have left all, and followed thee. (Matt. 19:27.)
Now Peter although earnest in spirit, yet still weak in bodily inclination, is declared about to deny his Lord; for he could not equal the constancy of the Divine will. Our Lord's Passion has rivals, but no equal.
Peter, though ready in spirit, was still weak in the body and was being prepared emotionally to deny the Lord; for he could not match the steadfastness of divine intention. The passion of the Lord has imitators, but not equals. Thus, I do not criticize him for his denial, but praise him for his tears. It is one thing to share in a common human condition, and another to possess a special virtue. And therefore, he is instructed to be cautious, not forced to deny.
(Hom. 82. in Matt.) Now He said not, 'I have granted,' but I have prayed. For He speaks humbly as approaching unto His Passion, and that He may manifest His human nature. For He who had spoken not in supplication, but by authority, Upon this rock I will build my Church, and I will give thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven, (Matt. 16:18.) how should He have need of prayer that He might stay one agitated soul? He does not say, "I have prayed that thou deny not," but that thou do not abandon thy faith.
The Savior once to Peter showed
What hidden power this bird may have,
And warned that ere the cock would crow
Himself three times must be denied.
For evil deeds are ever done
Before that herald of the dawn
Enlightens humankind and brings
An end to error and to sin.
Forthwith he wept his bitter fall
Whose lying lips denied the Christ,
The while his heart was innocent,
And steadfast faith his soul preserved.
And never more such word he spoke,
By slip of tongue or conscious fault,
For mindful of the crowing cock,
The just man ceased from ways of sin.
Hence all now hold in firm belief
That in the stillness of the night
When loudly crows the joyful cock
Our Lord came back from hell’s dim shore.
(de Con. Ev. l. iii. c. 2.) Now what is here said concerning the foregoing denial of Peter is contained in all the Evangelists, but they do not all happen to relate it upon the same occasion in the discourse. Matthew and Mark subjoin it after our Lord had departed from the house where He had eaten the Passover, but Luke and John before He went out from thence. But we may easily understand either that the two former used these words, recapitulating them, or the two others anticipating them: only it rather moves us, that not only the words but even the sentences of our Lord, in which Peter being troubled used that boast of dying either for or with our Lord, are given so differently, as rather to compel us to believe that he thrice uttered his boast at different parts of our Lord's discourse, and that he was thrice answered by our Lord, that before the cock crowed he should deny Him thrice.
In the passion of his zeal, Peter professed steadfastness and endurance to the last extremity, saying that he would courageously resist the terrors of death and count chains as nothing. In so doing, he erred from what was right. When the Savior told Peter that he would be weak and contradict the Lord, he should not have loudly protested the contrary. The Truth could not lie. Peter should have rather asked strength from Christ, either that he might not suffer this or that he might be rescued immediately from harm. He was fervent in spirit, warm in his love toward Christ, and of unrestrained zeal in rightly performing those duties which fit a disciple in his service to his master. Peter declares that he will endure to the last extremity. Christ rebuked him for foolishly speaking against what was foreknown and for his unreasonable haste in contradicting the Savior's words. For this reason he says, "Truly I tell you, that the rooster will not crow tonight, until you have three times denied me." This proved true. Let us not think highly of ourselves, even if we see ourselves greatly distinguished for our virtues. Let us rather offer the praises of our thanks to Christ who redeems us and who grants us even the desire to be able to act correctly.
Lest the eleven should be boastful, and impute it to their own strength, that they almost alone among so many thousands of the Jews were said to have continued with our Lord in His temptations, He shows them, that if they had not been protected by the aid of their Master succouring them, they would have been beaten down by the same storm as the rest. Hence it follows, And the Lord said unto Simon, Simon, behold, Satan hath desired thee, that he may sift thee as wheat. That is, he hath longed to tempt you and to shake you, as he who cleanses wheat by winnowing. Wherein He teaches that no man's faith is tried unless God permits it.
As if to say, As I by prayer protected your faith that it should not fail, so do you remember to sustain the weaker brethren, that they despair not of pardon.
Because the Lord said He had prayed for Peter's faith, Peter conscious of present affection and fervent faith, but unconscious of his coming fall, does not believe he could in any way fall from Christ. As it follows, And he said unto him, Lord, I am ready to go with thee to prison and to death.
He said to him: "Lord, I am ready to go with you both to prison and to death." But he said: "I tell you, Peter, the cock will not crow today until you deny three times that you know me." Because the Lord had said that he had prayed for Peter's faith, he, aware of his present fervent affection and faith, but ignorant of his future fall, did not believe that he could in any way fail him. But he who alone knows what is in man, so that no faithful person may either confidently trust in their own stability or carelessly distrust their fall, foretells as God the manner, time, and number of his denial, and as a merciful one promises the help of his protection.
Now this was said to Peter, because he was bolder than the rest, and might feel proud because of the things which Christ had promised.
For albeit thou art for a time shaken, yet thou boldest stored up, a seed of faith; though the spirit has shed its leaves in temptation, yet the root is firm. Satan then seeks to harm thee, because he is envious of my love for thee, but notwithstanding that I have prayed for thee, thou shalt fall. Hence it follows, And when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren. As if He says, After that thou hast wept and repented thy denial of Me, strengthen thy brethren, for I have deputed thee to be the head of the Apostles. For this befits thee who art with Me, the strength and rock of the Church. And this must be understood not only of the Apostles who then were, but of all the faithful who were about to be, even to the end of the world; that none of the believers might despair, seeing that Peter though an Apostle denied his Lord, yet afterwards by penitence obtained the high privilege of being the Ruler (ἐπιστάτης) of the world.
He burns forth indeed with too much love, and promises what is impossible to him. But it behoved him as soon as he heard from the Truth that he was to be tempted, to be no longer confident. Now the Lord, seeing that Peter spoke boastfully, reveals the nature of his temptation, namely, that he would deny Him; I tell thee, Peter, the cock shall not crow this day, before that thou thrice deny, &c.
From hence we draw a great doctrine, that human resolve is not sufficient without the Divine support. For Peter with all his zeal, nevertheless when forsaken of God was overthrown by the enemy.
Continue studying Luke 22:34 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Luke 22:34 records Jesus' solemn prophecy to Peter during the Last Supper, directly refuting Peter's confident boast of loyalty. Jesus declares that before the cock crows that very day, Peter will deny knowing Him three times. This poignant exchange underscores the stark contrast between human self-assurance and divine foreknowledge, setting the stage for Peter's profound failure and subsequent restoration, a pivotal moment revealing both human frailty and Christ's unwavering grace.
Context
Literary Context
This prophecy immediately follows Peter's fervent declaration of unwavering loyalty and readiness to face prison and death with Jesus, as recorded in Luke 22:33. The disciples had just concluded a dispute about who among them was the greatest (Luke 22:24-30), a discussion Jesus reframed with a teaching on servant leadership and a promise of future authority. Amidst these intimate, yet imperfect, moments in the Upper Room, Jesus turns to Peter, singling him out for a specific warning about an impending spiritual sifting (Luke 22:31-32), indicating His deep awareness of the trials Peter would face and His intercession on Peter's behalf, even before the denial. This prophecy thus serves as a direct, personal challenge to Peter's self-confidence, immediately preceding Jesus' arrest and trial, and foreshadowing the immense pressure Peter would soon experience.
Historical & Cultural Context
The setting is Jerusalem during the Passover, a time of heightened religious and political tension. Jesus and His disciples are observing the Passover meal, a deeply symbolic event commemorating Israel's liberation from slavery. The "cock crow" was a well-understood time marker in ancient Jewish and Roman society. While it literally refers to a rooster's crow, it also designated the third watch of the night (from midnight to approximately 3 AM), known as gallicinium (Latin for "cockcrow"). This specific timing emphasizes the immediacy and unexpected nature of Peter's denial, occurring within hours of his fervent pledge. The public nature of the trials and the presence of Roman and Jewish authorities would have created an atmosphere of fear and intimidation, contributing to the pressure Peter would face. Peter, a Galilean, might have felt particularly vulnerable in the Jerusalem court setting, where his accent could betray him.
Key Themes
Luke 22:34 contributes significantly to several major themes within the Gospel of Luke and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it powerfully illustrates Divine Foreknowledge and Sovereignty. Jesus' precise prediction of Peter's denial, including the number of times and the timing, demonstrates His omniscient knowledge and His sovereign control over events, even amidst His own impending suffering and betrayal. This highlights His divine nature, as seen in other prophecies He made, such as His own death and resurrection (Luke 9:22). Secondly, the verse underscores Human Frailty and Overconfidence. Peter's boast in Luke 22:33 reveals a common human tendency to overestimate one's spiritual strength and underestimate the power of temptation or fear. His subsequent failure serves as a stark reminder that even the most devoted followers are susceptible to weakness when faced with intense pressure, emphasizing the need for humility and reliance on God's grace. Thirdly, it is a clear example of Prophecy and Fulfillment. This verse is a precise, verifiable prophecy that is literally fulfilled within hours, as meticulously recounted in Luke 22:54-62 and parallel accounts in other Gospels. This fulfillment reinforces the reliability and authority of Jesus' words and the unfolding of God's predetermined plan.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This verb (G2036) typically refers to speaking or saying by word or writing, often in a definite past tense. In this context, it signifies Jesus' direct and authoritative declaration to Peter, a pronouncement of truth rather than a casual remark. It carries the weight of a divine oracle.
This verb (G533) means "to deny utterly," "to disown," or "to abstain." It implies a complete and emphatic repudiation. Peter's denial would not be a mere oversight but a deliberate and forceful rejection of his association with Jesus, driven by fear and self-preservation.
This verb (G1492) primarily means "to see" (literally or figuratively), but in its perfect tense (as used here), it carries the meaning "to know" or "to be aware." When Peter denies knowing Jesus, he is not merely claiming ignorance of His identity, but disavowing any personal relationship or acquaintance with Him, a profound betrayal of their intimate bond.
Verse Breakdown
"And he said, 'I tell thee, Peter,'"
This opening establishes the speaker as Jesus and the direct recipient as Peter, emphasizing the personal and specific nature of this prophecy. The phrase "I tell thee" (Greek, legō soi) signifies a solemn and authoritative declaration, demanding Peter's full attention and implying the certainty of what is to follow. It highlights Jesus' direct engagement with Peter's earlier boast.
"the cock shall not crow this day,"
This clause sets the precise temporal boundary for the prophecy's fulfillment. The "cock crow" refers to the literal crowing of a rooster, a common sound marking the approach of dawn, but also, as noted in the context, a specific watch of the night. The phrase "this day" emphasizes the immediacy of the event, indicating that Peter's denial would occur within the very same 24-hour period that was just beginning, before the next full sunrise.
"before that thou shalt thrice deny that thou knowest me.'"
This final clause details the specific act and its repetition. "Thrice" (Greek, tris) underscores the complete and public nature of Peter's disavowal. The act of "denying that thou knowest me" signifies a profound betrayal, a public renunciation of his relationship with Jesus, not merely a failure to acknowledge Him. This prediction directly contradicts Peter's earlier fervent pledge of loyalty and readiness to die for Jesus, highlighting the stark reality of human weakness under pressure.
Literary Devices
Luke 22:34 is rich with literary devices that amplify its dramatic and theological impact. The primary device is Prophecy, as Jesus foretells a future event with absolute precision, demonstrating His divine omniscience and control over unfolding circumstances. This prophecy also functions as Foreshadowing, preparing the reader for the inevitable and painful reality of Peter's failure, which will occur later in the narrative. There is profound Irony present: Peter, the rock upon whom Jesus would build His church, is predicted to crumble under pressure, directly contradicting his confident self-assessment. This highlights the ironic contrast between Peter's bold declaration and his impending weakness. Furthermore, the "cock crow" can be seen as a form of Symbolism, not just a literal time marker, but a symbolic alarm clock that awakens Peter to the devastating reality of his betrayal and the truth of Jesus' words. It marks a moment of profound spiritual awakening and bitter repentance for Peter.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Luke 22:34 is a profound theological statement on the nature of divine knowledge and human frailty. It reveals Jesus' perfect foreknowledge, not as a deterministic force that negates human free will, but as an expression of His comprehensive understanding of all things, including the choices and weaknesses of His closest disciples. This foreknowledge does not prevent Peter's denial, but it frames it within a larger divine plan that includes grace and restoration. Peter's failure, though devastating, becomes a powerful testament to the depth of God's mercy and the transformative power of repentance, demonstrating that even profound human weakness can be redeemed and used for God's glory. The incident serves as a timeless warning against spiritual pride and self-reliance, urging believers to cultivate humility and a constant dependence on Christ's sustaining power, knowing that His grace is sufficient even in our deepest failures.
Reflection and Application
Luke 22:34 offers profound insights for contemporary believers, serving as a powerful mirror reflecting our own potential for spiritual overconfidence and the necessity of humility. Peter's boast and subsequent fall remind us that fervent declarations of faith, while commendable, must be tempered with a realistic understanding of our own limitations and the insidious nature of temptation. We are called not to rely on our own strength or resolve, but to cultivate a deep, abiding dependence on Christ, recognizing that true faithfulness flows from His empowering grace, not our inherent capabilities. When we inevitably stumble or fail, as Peter did, this passage offers a message of hope: Jesus' foreknowledge of our failures is accompanied by His intercession for our faith (Luke 22:32), and His plan includes our restoration and strengthening. This encourages us to approach our spiritual walk with both earnest commitment and humble reliance, always looking to Christ for strength and forgiveness.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did Jesus tell Peter this, knowing it would happen? Was it to shame him?
Jesus' prophecy was not intended to shame Peter but to prepare him, demonstrate divine foreknowledge, and ultimately reveal His profound grace. By foretelling Peter's denial, Jesus affirmed His omniscience, showing that even Peter's most significant failure was within God's sovereign plan. More importantly, Jesus immediately followed this prophecy with a prayer for Peter's faith not to fail and a command to strengthen his brothers after he turned back (Luke 22:32). This indicates that Jesus' purpose was redemptive: to allow Peter to experience the depth of his own weakness, leading to genuine repentance and a stronger, more humble faith, which would then equip him to lead others. It was a painful but necessary lesson for Peter's spiritual formation and future leadership.
What is the significance of "the cock shall not crow this day"?
The phrase "the cock shall not crow this day" serves as a precise and immediate time marker for the prophecy's fulfillment. In the context of ancient Jewish and Roman practices, the "cockcrow" (Latin: gallicinium) was not only the literal crowing of a rooster but also designated the third watch of the night, typically occurring between midnight and 3 AM. This detail underscores the swiftness and unexpected nature of Peter's denial, as it would occur within hours of his confident boast and before the new day had fully dawned. Its significance lies in its exact fulfillment, highlighting the accuracy of Jesus' prophecy and the unfolding of God's plan even in moments of human failure.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Luke 22:34 powerfully points to Christ in several profound ways. Firstly, it underscores Jesus' divine omniscience and sovereignty. His ability to precisely predict Peter's triple denial, including the specific timing before the cockcrow, unequivocally demonstrates His divine nature. This is not merely human foresight but an attribute of God who knows the end from the beginning (Isaiah 46:10). Even in His deepest suffering, Jesus remains in control, fulfilling His prophetic role as the Messiah. Secondly, this passage highlights Jesus' unwavering grace and pastoral heart. Despite knowing Peter's impending failure, Jesus does not condemn him but prays for him (Luke 22:32), expressing a deep compassion that extends beyond human weakness. This foreshadows His ultimate redemptive work on the cross, where He bears the sins of all, including Peter's denial and our own failures (1 Peter 2:24). Finally, Peter's denial and subsequent restoration by Jesus after the resurrection (John 21:15-19) powerfully illustrate the transformative power of Christ's grace. Peter's failure, though painful, became a crucible that refined his faith, stripping away self-reliance and leading him to a deeper dependence on Christ. This experience prepared him to become a foundational leader of the early church, boldly proclaiming the gospel (Acts 2:14-41), a testament to Christ's ability to redeem and empower even those who stumble. Thus, Luke 22:34 is not just a story of human failure, but a profound revelation of Christ's perfect knowledge, enduring love, and redemptive power, offering hope and restoration to all who, like Peter, falter yet return to Him.