Luke 1:64
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- ἈνεῴχθηAneōchthēWas openedG455V-API-3SVerb Aorist Passive Indicative 3rd Singular
- δὲdethenG1161CONJConjunction
- τὸtotheG3588T-NSNDefinite article Nominative Singular Neuter
- στόμαstomamouthG4750N-NSNNoun Nominative Singular Neuter
- αὐτοῦautouof himG846P-GSMPersonal pronoun Genitive Singular Masculine
- παραχρῆμαparachrēmaimmediatelyG3916ADVAdverb
- καὶkaiandG2532CONJConjunction
- ἡhētheG3588T-NSFDefinite article Nominative Singular Feminine
- γλῶσσαglōssatongueG1100N-NSFNoun Nominative Singular Feminine
- αὐτοῦautouof himG846P-GSMPersonal pronoun Genitive Singular Masculine
- καὶkaiandG2532CONJConjunction
- ἐλάλειelaleihe was speakingG2980V-IAI-3SVerb Imperfect Active Indicative 3rd Singular
- εὐλογῶνeulogōnblessingG2127V-PAP-NSMVerb Present Active Participle Nominative Singular Masculine
- τὸνton[the]G3588T-ASMDefinite article Accusative Singular Masculine
- θεόνtheonGodG2316N-ASM-TNoun Accusative Singular Masculine Title
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
See on the biblical-era maps



Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Luke 1:57–66. He set out his notes in a three-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
In these verses, we have,
I.The birth of John Baptist, Luke 1:57.
Though he was conceived in the womb by miracle, he continued in the womb according to the ordinary course of nature (so did our Saviour): Elisabeth's full time came, that she should be delivered, and then she brought forth a son. Promised mercies are to be expected when the full time for them is come, and not before.
II.The great joy that was among all the relations of the family, upon this extraordinary occasion (Luke 1:58):
Her neighbours and her cousins heard of it; for it would be in every body's mouth, as next to miraculous. Dr. Lightfoot observes that Hebron was inhabited by priests of the family of Aaron, and that those were the cousins here spoken of; but the fields and villages about, by the children of Judah, and that those were the neighbours. Now these here discovered,
1.A pious regard to God. They acknowledged that the Lord had magnified his mercy to her, so the word is. It was a mercy to have her reproach taken away, a mercy to have her family built up, and the more being a family of priests, devoted to God, and employed for him. Many things concurred to make the mercy great - that she had been long barren, was now old, but especially that the child should be great in the sight of the Lord.
2.A friendly regard to Elisabeth. When she rejoiced, they rejoiced with her. We ought to take pleasure in the prosperity of our neighbours and friends, and to be thankful to God for their comforts as for our own.
III.The dispute that was among them concerning the naming him (Luke 1:59):
On the eighth day, as God has appointed, they came together, to circumcise the child; it was here, in Hebron, that circumcision was first instituted; and Isaac, who, like John Baptist, was born by promise, was one of the first that was submitted to it, at least the chief eyed in the institution of it. They that rejoiced in the birth of the child came together to the circumcising of him. Note, The greatest comfort we can take in our children is in giving them up to God, and recognizing their covenant-relation to him. The baptism of our children should be more our joy than their birth.
Now it was the custom, when they circumcised their children, to name them, because, when Abram was circumcised God gave him a new name, and called him Abraham; and it is not unfit that they should be left nameless till they are by name given up to God. Now,
1.Some proposed that he should be called by his father's name, Zacharias. We have not any instance in scripture that the child should bear the father's name; but perhaps it was of late come into use among the Jews, at it is with us, and they intended hereby to do honour to the father, who was not likely to have another child.
2.The mother opposed it, and would have called him John; having learned, either by inspiration of the Holy Ghost (as is most probable), or by information in writing from her husband, that God appointed this to be his name (Luke 1:60); He shall be called Johanan - Gracious, because he shall introduce the gospel of Christ, wherein God's grace shines more brightly than ever.
3.The relations objected against that (Luke 1:61): "There is none of thy kindred, none of the relations of thy family, that is called by that name; and therefore, if he may not have his father's name, yet let him have the name of some of his kindred, who will take it as a piece of respect to have such a child of wonders as this named from them." Note, As those that have friends must show themselves friendly, so those that have relations must be obliging to them in all the usual regards that are paid to kindred.
4.They appealed to the father, and would try if they could possibly get to know his mind; for it was his office to name the child, Luke 1:62. They made signs to him, by which it appears that he was deaf as well as dumb; nay, it should seem, mindless of any thing, else one would think they should at first have desired him to write down his child's name, if he had ever communicated any thing by writing since he was struck. However, they would carry the matter as far as they could, and therefore gave him to understand what the dispute was which he only could determine; whereupon he made signs to them to give him a table-book, such as they then used, and with the pencil he wrote these words, His name is John, Luke 1:63. Note, "It shall be so," or, "I would have it so," but "It is so." The matter is determined already; the angel had given him that name. Observe, When Zacharias could not speak, he wrote. When ministers have their mouths stopped, that they cannot preach, yet they may be doing good as long as they have not their hands tied, that they cannot write. Many of the martyrs in prison wrote letters to their friends, which were of great use; blessed Paul himself did so. Zacharias's pitching upon the same name that Elisabeth had chosen was a great surprise to the company: They marvelled all; for they knew not that, though by reason of his deafness and dumbness they could not converse together, yet they were both guided by one and the same Spirit: or perhaps they marvelled that he wrote so distinctly and intelligently, which (the stroke he was under being somewhat like that of a palsy) he had not done before.
5.He thereupon recovered the use of his speech (Luke 1:64): His mouth was opened immediately. The time prefixed for his being silenced was till the day that these blessed things shall be fulfilled (Luke 1:20); not all the things going before concerning John's ministry, but those which relate to his birth and name (Luke 1:13). That time was now expired, whereupon the restraint was taken off, and God gave him the opening of the mouth again, as he did to Ezekiel, Ezekiel 3:27. Dr. Lightfoot compares this case of Zacharias with that of Moses, Exodus 4:24-26. Moses, for distrust, is in danger of his life, as Zacharias, for the same fault, is struck dumb; but, upon the circumcision of his child, and recovery of his faith, there, as here, the danger is removed. Infidelity closed his mouth, and now believing opens it again; he believes, therefore he speaks. David lay under guilt from the conception of his child till a few days after its birth; then the Lord takes away his sin: upon his repentance, he shall not die. So here he shall be no longer dumb; his mouth was opened, and he spoke, and praised God. Note, When God opens our lips, our mouths must show forth his praise. As good be without our speech as not use it in praising God; for then our tongue is most our glory when it is employed for God's glory.
6.These things were told all the country over, to the great amazement of all that heard them, Luke 1:65, Luke 1:66. The sentiments of the people are not to be slighted, but taken notice of. We are here told,
(1.)That these sayings were discoursed of, and were the common talk all about the hill-country of Judea. It is a pity but a narrative of them had been drawn up, and published in the world, immediately.
(2.)That most people who heard of these things were put into consternation by them: Fear came on all them that dwell round about there. If we have not a good hope, as we ought to have, built upon the gospel, we may expect that the tidings of it will fill us with fear. They believed and trembled, whereas they should have believed and triumphed.
(3.)It raised the expectations of people concerning this child, and obliged them to have their eye upon him, to see what he would come to. They laid up these presages in their hearts, treasured them up in mind and memory, as foreseeing they should hereafter have occasion to recollect them. Note, What we hear, that may be of use to us, we should treasure up, that we may be able to bring forth, for the benefit of others, things new and old, and, when things come to perfection, may be able to look back upon the presages thereof, and to say, "It was what we might expect." They said within themselves, and said among themselves, "What manner of child shall this be? What will be the fruit when these are the buds, or rather when the root is out of such a dry ground?" Note, When children are born into the world, it is very uncertain what they will prove; yet sometimes there have been early indications of something great, as in the birth of Moses, Samson, Samuel, and here of John. And we have reason to think that there were some of those living at the time when John began his public ministry who could, and did, remember these things, and relate them to others, which contributed as much as any thing to the great flocking there was after him.
Lastly, It is said, The hand of the Lord was with him; that is, he was taken under the special protection of the Almighty, from his birth, as one designed for something great and considerable, and there were many instances of it. It appeared likewise that the Spirit was at work upon his soul very early. As soon as he began to speak or go, you might perceive something in him very extraordinary. Note, God has ways of operating upon children in their infancy, which we cannot account for. God never made a soul but he knew how to sanctify it.
Historical interpretation
Seven Centuries of Reception
8 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
(Orat. vi.) The birth of John then broke the silence of Zacharias, as it follows, And his mouth was opened. For it were unreasonable when the voice of the Word had come forth, that his father should remain speechless.
For the bringing forth of saints causes the rejoicing of many; it is a common blessing; for justice is a public virtue, and therefore at the birth of a just man a sign of his future life is sent beforehand, and the grace of the virtue which is to follow is represented, being foreshadowed by the rejoicing of the neighbours.
The holy Evangelist has especially remarked, that many thought the child should be called after his father Zacharias, in order that we might understand, not that any name of his kinsfolk was displeasing to his mother, but that the same word had been communicated to her by the Holy Spirit, which had been foretold by the Angel to Zacharias. And in truth, being dumb, Zacharias was unable to mention his son's name to his wife, but Elisabeth obtained by prophecy what she had not learnt from her husband. Hence it follows, And she answered, &c. Marvel not that the woman pronounced the name which she had never heard, seeing the Holy Spirit who imparted it to the Angel revealed it to her; nor could she be ignorant of the forerunner of the Lord, who had prophesied of Christ. And it well follows, And they said unto her, &c. that you might consider that the name belongs not to the family, but to the Prophet. Zacharias also is questioned, and signs made to him, as it follows, And they made signs to the father, &c. But since unbelief had so bereft him of utterance and hearing, that he could not use his voice, he spoke by his hand-writing, as it follows, And he asked for a writing table, and wrote, saying, His name is John; that is, we give no name to him who has received his name from God.
Rightly also, from that moment was his tongue loosed, for that which unbelief had bound, faith set free. Let us then also believe, in order that our tongue, which has been bound by the chains of unbelief, may be loosed by the voice of reason. Let us write mysteries by the Spirit if we wish to speak. Let us write the forerunner of Christ, not on tables of stone, but on the fleshly tablets of the heart. For he who names John, prophesies Christ. For it follows, And he spake, giving thanks.
(in Gen. Hom. 39.) The rite of circumcision was first delivered to Abraham as a sign of distinction, that the race of the Patriarch might be preserved in unmixed purity, and so might be able to obtain the promises. But now that the promise of the covenant is fulfilled, the sign attached to it is removed. So then through Christ circumcision ceased, and baptism came in its place; but first it was right that John should be circumcised; as it is said, And it came to pass, that on the eighth day, &c. For the Lord had said, Let the child of eight days be circumcised among you. (Gen. 17:13.) But this measurement of time I conceive was ordered by Divine mercy for two reasons. First, because in its most tender years the child the more easily bears the cutting of the flesh. Secondly, that from the very operation itself we might be reminded that it was done for a sign; for the young child scarcely distinguishes any of the things that are around him. But after the circumcision, the name was conferred, as it follows, And they called him. But this was done because we must first receive the seal of the Lord, then the name of man. Or, because no man except he first cast aside his fleshly lusts, which circumcision signifies, is worthy to have his name written in the book of life.
But the name John is also interpreted the grace of God. Because then by the favour of Divine grace, not by nature, Elisabeth conceived this son, they engraved the memory of the benefit on the name of the child.
When John his son was born, among his neighbors there was concern about what name he should be given. Writing tablets were offered to his father so that he himself could put down the name that he had decided upon, so that he might express in writing what he could not in speech. Then, in a wonderful manner, when he had taken the tablets in order to begin writing, his tongue was loosened, the written word gave way to speech, and he did not write “John” but spoke it. Consider, then, the merit of the holy Baptist: he gave his father back his voice, he restored the faculty of speech to the priest. Consider, I say, his merit: John unloosed the mouth that the angel had bound. What Gabriel had closed the little child unlocked.… When John is born the father suddenly becomes a prophet or priest, speech attains its use, love receives an offspring, the office recognizes the priest.
On the day of John’s circumcision, when he also received his name, “fear came upon all their neighbors, and all these words were spread abroad throughout the mountain country of Judea.” Furthermore, at the time of our Lord’s resurrection, when the Spirit had been sent down from above and the glory of his name was made known to the world by the apostles, a most salutary fear immediately struck the hearts. Not only of the Jews, who were of the neighborhood either by their physical location or by their knowledge of the law, but also those of foreign nations, even to the ends of the earth. And John’s reputation for virtue exceeded not only the whole mountain country of Judea, but also all the heights of worldly kingdoms and worldly wisdom, so that everywhere people left behind their former way of life and flocked together to attain the sacramental mysteries of his faith.
Now in an allegory, the celebration of John's birth was the beginning of the grace of the New Covenant. His neighbours and kinsfolk had rather give him the name of his father than that of John. For the Jews, who by the observance of the Law were united to him as it were by ties of kindred, chose rather to follow the righteousness which is of the Law, than receive the grace of faith. But the name of John, (i. e. the grace of God,) his mother in word, his father in writing, suffice to announce, for both the Law itself as well as the Psalms and the Prophecies, in the plainest language foretel the grace of Christ; and that ancient priesthood, by the foreshadowing of its ceremonies and sacrifices, bears testimony to the same. And well doth Zacharias speak on the eighth day of the birth of his child, for by the resurrection of the Lord, which took place on the eighth day, i. e. the day after the sabbath, (septimam sabbati.) the hidden secrets of the legal priesthood were revealed.
His mouth and his tongue were immediately opened, and he spoke, blessing God. And fear came upon all their neighbors. Because the voice of one crying in the wilderness was born, rightly was the father's tongue loosened. For it was not fitting that the father remain silent from praises, who rejoiced in the birth of the herald of the Word. Indeed, the lips bound by unbelief were now loosened by faith. But if anyone desires to scrutinize closely, these things also allegorically point to the celebrated nativity of John, the initiating sublimity of the grace of the New Testament. The neighbors and relatives preferred to name the father rather than John, because the Jews, who were connected to him by the observance of the law as if by kinship, rather desired to follow the justice that is from the law than to accept the grace of faith. But John, which means the grace of God, the mother strives to make known by words, the father by writing, because even the law itself, the psalms, and the prophets proclaim the grace of Christ with clear utterances, and the old priesthood testifies to him with the shadows of ritual ceremonies and sacrifices. And fittingly, Zacharias speaks on the eighth day after the child was born, because through the resurrection of the Lord, which happened on the eighth day, i.e., after the seventh of the Sabbath, the hidden secrets of the legal priesthood were revealed, and the tongue of the Jewish priests, which was bound by the chains of distrust, was loosened by the voice of rational understanding.
And because with the mother the dumb father also agreed as to the name of the child, it follows, And they all marvelled. For there was no one of this name among their kinsfolk that any one could say that they had both previously determined upon it.
Continue studying Luke 1:64 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
At once Zacharias’s mouth was opened and his tongue loosed, and the first thing he did with his restored voice was praise God.
“And his mouth was opened immediately,”
Anoígō, opened, and parachrēma, at once. The silence ended the moment he obeyed.
“and his tongue loosed,”
His speech came back whole after the months of silence.
“and he spake, and praised God.”
Eulogéō, to bless or speak well of. His first words are praise, and they lead into the Benedictus (Luke 1:68).
His Name Is John: The Birth of John the Baptist
Luke 1:57–66
Summary
Elisabeth’s time comes and she gives birth to a son, just as the angel Gabriel promised Zacharias. Her neighbours and relatives hear how the Lord has shown her great mercy, and they rejoice with her. On the eighth day they gather to circumcise the child and set about calling him Zacharias after his father. Elisabeth answers that he shall be called John. When they turn to his father with signs, Zacharias asks for a writing tablet and writes, “His name is John.” At once his mouth is opened, and his first words praise God. Fear comes on the whole neighbourhood, the news runs through the hill country of Judaea, and all who hear it wonder what this child will be, for the hand of the Lord is with him. In ten verses God keeps his word to the letter, a family obeys him against long custom, and a doubting priest is given back his voice to bless the God who kept his promise.
God keeps his promise to Elisabeth
Everything in this passage grows out of the opening of Luke’s Gospel. Zacharias, a priest, and his wife Elisabeth were old, and she had been barren. The angel Gabriel appeared to Zacharias in the temple and promised him a son who was to be named John (Luke 1:5–25, Luke 1:11–20, Luke 1:13). Zacharias doubted, and so he was struck dumb until the promise came to pass (Luke 1:18–20, Luke 1:20). Then Gabriel came to Mary, and when Mary visited Elisabeth in the hill country, the baby leapt in Elisabeth’s womb at the presence of the Messiah (Luke 1:39–45). Verse 57 is the moment all of this has been leading to.
“Elisabeth’s full time came” uses the verb plḗthō, to fill or to fulfil, with chrónos, time. The period of her pregnancy had reached its full measure, and behind the ordinary months stands the time God had appointed for this birth. Paul uses the same picture for the coming of Christ: “when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son” (Galatians 4:4). God’s promises are certain, and they arrive when he says.
Luke uses two verbs for the birth. “That she should be delivered” is tíktō, the act of giving birth, and “she brought forth a son” is gennáō, which looks at the result, a living child come into the world. The words are simple, and the simplicity carries great weight, because this son is exactly what Gabriel announced in Luke 1:13. A woman past the age of childbearing holds the child God promised.
Barrenness and God’s mercy in Israel
In Israel barrenness was a deep sorrow and was often felt as a shame, because it threatened the family line and the hope of descendants that God had promised Abraham. For a priestly household like this one, having no heir was a heavy grief. A child born after long barrenness, and in old age, was received as a special act of God. Elisabeth stands in a line of such women, with Sarah, Rebekah, Rachel and Hannah, whose wombs God opened, often for a purpose in his plan of redemption. The LORD promised Sarah a son when she was old (Genesis 18:9–15, with the promise itself at Genesis 18:10), and in due time “the LORD visited Sarah as he had said” and she bore Isaac (Genesis 21:1–2). Hannah too prayed, conceived and bore Samuel (1 Samuel 1:19–20). In each case God shows that “he hath remembered his covenant for ever” (Psalm 105:8).
Why John’s birth matters
John is the forerunner of the Messiah. Gabriel said he would turn many in Israel to the Lord and go before him “in the spirit and power of Elias”, “to make ready a people prepared for the Lord” (Luke 1:16–17, Luke 1:17). He is the messenger of whom God said through Malachi, “Behold, I will send my messenger, and he shall prepare the way before me” (Malachi 3:1), and the voice of Isaiah’s prophecy: “The voice of him that crieth in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the LORD” (Isaiah 40:3). His father will soon call him “the prophet of the Highest” (Luke 1:76). His preaching of repentance and his baptizing in the wilderness make him the bridge between the old covenant and the new. After a long time in which Israel had heard no prophet, his birth tells us that God’s long-awaited salvation is under way.
The neighbours and kinsfolk rejoice with her
Births in Israel belonged to the whole community. Family ties were strong, and neighbours and relatives shared each other’s sorrows and joys. Everyone around Elisabeth had known of her barrenness for years, so the news of this birth in her old age spread fast. The “neighbours” (períoikos) are those who lived around her. “Cousins” translates syngenḗs, which means kinsfolk or relatives in general, a wider word than our English “cousin”.
They “heard” (akoúō), and the word can carry understanding as well as hearing. They grasped what had happened, and they spoke of it as the Lord’s doing: “the Lord (kýrios) had shewed great mercy upon her.” The Greek is emegalynen eleos, “he had magnified his mercy”. Megalýnō means to make great, and éleos is mercy, the compassion that acts to help and deliver. God’s mercy to Elisabeth was abundant and plain for everyone to see. It was a free and gracious kindness, given by the God whose “mercy is on them that fear him from generation to generation”, as Mary had just sung (Luke 1:50).
“They rejoiced with her” is one word, synchaírō, to rejoice together. Her neighbours took her gladness as their own, which is a deeper thing than offering congratulations. The same joy surrounded the birth of Isaac, when Sarah said, “God hath made me to laugh, so that all that hear will laugh with me” (Genesis 21:6, in the account of Genesis 21:1–7). It is the gladness of the returned exiles: “The LORD hath done great things for us; whereof we are glad” (Psalm 126:2–3). Isaiah calls on all who love Jerusalem to “rejoice ye with Jerusalem, and be glad with her” (Isaiah 66:10), and Paul tells the church, “Rejoice with them that do rejoice” (Romans 12:15). The shared joy of these villagers was also a public witness that God had acted, and it prepared people to receive John’s ministry later.
The eighth day and the family name
“It came to pass” (gínomai, to happen or come about) “that on the eighth day they came to circumcise the child.” The eighth day, ógdoos, was fixed by God himself. He commanded Abraham, “he that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you” (Genesis 17:12), and the law of Moses repeats it: “in the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be circumcised” (Leviticus 12:3). Circumcision was the sign of the covenant, and it marked a boy’s entry into the covenant people of Israel. Zacharias and Elisabeth keep God’s law with their son from his first week.
Why the eighth day? First and simply, because God commanded it. In Jewish thought the eighth day, coming after a complete week of seven, also often stood for a new beginning, which suits a child’s entry into a covenant relationship with God.
The circumcision was also the occasion for formally naming a boy, and it was customary to name him after a respected member of the family, especially the father or grandfather, to honour the family line. So the relatives and neighbours who had gathered “called him Zacharias, after the name of his father.” The verb is kaléō, to call or to name, and it comes again and again in these verses. They meant well. They had no idea that God had already named this child.
“He shall be called John”
Elisabeth “answered and said”. The verb apokrínomai means to respond, and in Hebrew idiom it can mean to begin speaking where an answer is expected. Her answer is firm. “Not so” is ouchí, a strong form of “not”, and “but” is allá, a strong word of contrast. “He shall be called” uses kaléō in the future passive, which states the name as settled. The name she gives is the very name Gabriel gave Zacharias: “thou shalt call his name John” (Luke 1:13).
How did Elisabeth know the name?
Luke does not tell us. Most likely Zacharias, though he could not speak, had passed on the angel’s word to her, perhaps by writing as he does in Luke 1:63, or God may have made it known to her directly. Either way, her answer is faith and obedience. With her husband silent beside her, she says aloud the name God chose, against the custom of the whole family, and the fact that the mother speaks the name while the father who doubted cannot is part of the wonder of the scene.
“There is none of thy kindred that is called by this name”
The relatives “said” (épō) what everyone was thinking. Syngéneia is kindred, the family as a whole, and their point is that in all of Elisabeth’s family nobody was called (kaléō) John. In a culture where names carried weight and honoured one’s ancestors, a name with no family history was surprising. Without knowing it they put their finger on the truth about this child. His calling as the forerunner of the Messiah (Luke 3:4) had no precedent in any family, and his name came from God.
God names and calls his servants before they are born. The Servant in Isaiah says, “The LORD hath called me from the womb; from the bowels of my mother hath he made mention of my name” (Isaiah 49:1). To Jeremiah God said, “Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations” (Jeremiah 1:5). Paul speaks of God, “who separated me from my mother’s womb, and called me by his grace” (Galatians 1:15). God’s plans run higher than our customs: “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD” (Isaiah 55:8–9).
What does the name John mean?
John, in Greek Iōánnēs, comes from the Hebrew Yochanan, which means “the LORD is gracious” or “God has shown favour”. The name fits him well. His birth was God’s grace to two old people who had waited long, and his whole ministry announced the grace of God that was coming in Jesus. “The law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ” (John 1:17), the Word made flesh, “full of grace and truth” (John 1:14). His father’s song will say that John goes before the Lord “to give knowledge of salvation unto his people by the remission of their sins” (Luke 1:76–77).
Zacharias writes the name
“They made signs to his father” uses enneúō, from a root meaning to nod, so they asked by gestures and nods. “How he would have him called” uses thélō, a word for what a person wills or chooses. They were asking for the father’s decision, since in their custom the father had the final say in naming his son.
Why did they ask by signs, when he could have been handed something to write on? Luke gives no reason. Perhaps they took it that he could understand and answer with a gesture, or writing simply did not occur to them at once. What the signs do show is how complete his silence was, and they lead straight to the moment when he writes.
“He asked for a writing table.” Aitéō is a deliberate request, and Zacharias seeks out the means to obey. The writing table, pinakidion, was a small wooden tablet, usually coated with wax, used for notes, messages and legal declarations, a common tool of the day for someone who could not speak. He “wrote” (gráphō), “saying, His name is John” (Iōánnēs). The writing is a public declaration that ends the dispute and agrees with Elisabeth and with the angel. He writes the name as something already decided, because God had decided it. After months of silence that followed his doubt, this is his act of faith and submission.
God had named children before they were born. He told Abraham, “Sarah thy wife shall bear thee a son indeed; and thou shalt call his name Isaac” (Genesis 17:19), and the angel would tell Joseph to call Mary’s son Jesus, “for he shall save his people from their sins” (Matthew 1:21). The relatives had their plans for the name, and God’s counsel stood, as the proverb says: “There are many devices in a man’s heart; nevertheless the counsel of the LORD, that shall stand” (Proverbs 19:21).
“And they marvelled all.” Thaumázō is to wonder, to be astonished. Everyone present wondered at the unexpected name, at how decisively the speechless father settled it, and at what happened next.
His mouth was opened, and he praised God
“His mouth was opened immediately, and his tongue loosed.” Anoígō is to open, and God opened what he had closed. Parachrēma, immediately, means on the spot. The moment Zacharias wrote the name, his speech came back whole, just as Gabriel had said it would when the things he promised were performed (Luke 1:20). For a priest whose service included speaking prayers and blessings, being struck dumb had been a heavy and public loss, and its sudden reversal was a public sign of God’s power and faithfulness before the whole gathering.
“He spake, and praised God.” The word is eulogéō, to speak well of, to bless or give thanks. With his first breath of speech after all those months, Zacharias blesses God. His praise grows into the prophecy that follows, the Benedictus (Luke 1:67–79, Luke 1:68–79), in which he speaks of his son’s calling as the prophet of the Highest (Luke 1:76).
Why was Zacharias struck dumb, and why was he healed at this moment?
He doubted Gabriel’s promise that his old, barren wife would bear a son (Luke 1:18–20). His silence was both a sign that the promise was true and a discipline for his unbelief, and it lasted through the months of Elisabeth’s pregnancy. It ended the moment he obeyed God’s word about the name. God disciplined him in love and then restored him in grace, and the man who had doubted now speaks only praise.
Scripture often speaks of the mouth as God’s to open. When Moses protested that he was slow of speech, the LORD answered that he himself had made man’s mouth, and promised, “I will be with thy mouth, and teach thee what thou shalt say” (Exodus 4:11–12). David prayed, “O Lord, open thou my lips; and my mouth shall shew forth thy praise” (Psalm 51:15). Isaiah foretold a day when “the tongue of the dumb” would sing (Isaiah 35:5–6), and Jesus opened the mouths of the dumb in his ministry (Matthew 9:32–33, Mark 7:32–35). Through Christ believers too “offer the sacrifice of praise to God continually” (Hebrews 13:15).
Fear and talk through the hill country
“Fear came on all that dwelt round about them.” Phóbos can mean alarm or fright, and here it is reverent awe, the humble response of people who know God has been at work among them. Gínomai, “came”, says that this awe came upon them, called out by what God had done. It is close kin to “the fear of the LORD”, which “is the beginning of wisdom” (Proverbs 9:10, Psalm 111:10). The church after Pentecost knew the same thing: “fear came upon every soul: and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles” (Acts 2:43).
“All these sayings were noised abroad.” Dialaléō joins “through” and “to speak”, and means to talk something over throughout a company, to make it widely known. “Sayings” is rhēma, which here covers the whole story: the birth to old parents, the father’s silence, the name, and his voice restored. The talk went “throughout all the hill country of Judaea” (oreinós Ioudaía), the high central country of Judaea where Zacharias and Elisabeth lived, the same hill country Mary had travelled to (Luke 1:39). These were close-knit rural villages where news travelled from one to the next by word of mouth. Luke’s repeated “all” stresses how widely the story was known. The shepherds would later spread the news of Jesus’ birth in the same way, and “all they that heard it wondered” (Luke 2:17–18).
“What manner of child shall this be?”
“All they that heard them” (akoúō again) “laid them up in their hearts”. The heart, kardía, is the inner person, the seat of thought, feeling and will. To lay these things up there is to keep them, turn them over and remember them as works of God. Mary did the same with the events of Jesus’ birth: “But Mary kept all these things, and pondered them in her heart” (Luke 2:19).
Their question, “What manner of child shall this be!”, is full of wonder and expectation. A birth marked by such signs told them that God had a special purpose for this boy, though they could only wait to see it. Isaac and Samuel had come in the same way, to parents who had waited long.
The hand of the Lord was with him
The last sentence is Luke’s own statement, and it answers the people’s wonder. “The hand of the Lord” (cheír, hand, with kýrios, Lord) is an Old Testament way of speaking about God’s active power, presence, favour and protection. Moses warned Pharaoh, “the hand of the LORD is upon thy cattle” (Exodus 9:3). “The hand of the LORD was on Elijah” when he ran before Ahab’s chariot (1 Kings 18:46), and Ezekiel says, “the hand of the LORD was strong upon me” (Ezekiel 3:14). In Acts the same words describe the Lord’s power with the first preachers: “the hand of the Lord was with them: and a great number believed” (Acts 11:21). For John it means that God was guarding, guiding and preparing him from infancy for the work he was born to do. Gabriel had said he would be “filled with the Holy Ghost, even from his mother’s womb” (Luke 1:15), and like Jeremiah and Paul he was set apart by God before he was born.
John and the One he came to announce
Everything about John points past himself. His preaching would fulfil Isaiah’s word about preparing the way of the Lord (Luke 3:3–6, Luke 3:4–6). He would point to Jesus and say, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). He told the crowds that the one coming after him would baptize them “with the Holy Ghost, and with fire” (Matthew 3:11), and he said of Jesus, “He must increase, but I must decrease” (John 3:30).
John’s birth was a wonder, and Jesus’ conception was a greater one, by the Holy Ghost coming upon Mary (Luke 1:34–35). John’s name was given by God, and so was the name of Jesus, which God has exalted as “a name which is above every name” (Philippians 2:9–11). John was circumcised on the eighth day, and in Christ believers receive “the circumcision made without hands” (Colossians 2:11–12). The great mercy shown to Elisabeth points to the mercy of God, “who is rich in mercy”, toward sinners dead in sin whom he has made alive with Christ (Ephesians 2:4–5). The joy of her neighbours looks ahead to the angel’s “good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people” (Luke 2:10). And the news that ran through the hills of Judaea looks ahead to the gospel that Jesus sent out to “all nations” (Matthew 28:19–20).
Shared joy, a name obeyed, and a mouth opened in praise
The God of this passage is faithful to the day and the detail. What he told Zacharias in the temple came to pass in the birth, in the name and in the opened mouth. When his promises to you seem long in coming, you can remember Elisabeth’s “full time” and trust that his times are set.
Elisabeth’s neighbours give a simple pattern for life together. When God is good to someone near you, you can take their joy as your own and give God the glory for it, as Paul says to rejoice with them that do rejoice.
Elisabeth and Zacharias also show what it looks like to hold to God’s word when the whole family expects something else. Their obedience cost them a little honour among their kin, and it opened the way for one of the clearest signs of God’s hand in the whole story.
And Zacharias shows how God deals with his children who stumble. He doubted, he bore God’s discipline for months, and when he obeyed, God restored him at once. His first words were praise. Like the people of the hill country, you can lay up what God has done in your heart and keep wondering at the hand of the Lord on those he calls.
Luke 1:57
“Now Elisabeth’s full time came”
Plḗthō with chrónos: the appointed time was filled up, the time God had set for the birth he promised.
“that she should be delivered;”
Tíktō, the act of giving birth. The long wait of an old, once-barren woman is over.
“and she brought forth a son.”
Gennáō looks at the result, a living son, exactly as Gabriel told Zacharias in Luke 1:13.
Luke 1:58
“And her neighbours and her cousins heard”
The períoikos lived around her, and the syngenḗs were her kinsfolk in general. Hearing (akoúō) here includes grasping what it meant.
“how the Lord had shewed great mercy upon her;”
Literally the Lord “magnified his mercy” (megalýnō, éleos), making his compassion great and plain to all.
“and they rejoiced with her.”
Synchaírō, to rejoice together. They shared her gladness as Sarah’s neighbours shared hers (Genesis 21:6).
Luke 1:59
“And it came to pass, that on the eighth day”
Gínomai, it happened. The eighth day (ógdoos) was set by God for circumcision (Genesis 17:12, Leviticus 12:3).
“they came to circumcise the child;”
Relatives and neighbours gathered for the covenant sign, which brought the boy into the covenant people.
“and they called him Zacharias, after the name of his father.”
Naming (kaléō) took place at the circumcision, and naming a son after his father honoured the family line.
Luke 1:60
“And his mother answered and said,”
Apokrínomai, to respond. Elisabeth speaks up for the speechless father.
“Not so;”
Ouchí, an emphatic no to the family’s plan.
“but he shall be called John.”
Allá sets the contrast sharply, and the future passive of kaléō states the name as settled. John, Iōánnēs, means “the LORD is gracious”.
Luke 1:61
“And they said unto her,”
Épō, to speak. The objection came from the gathered relatives together.
“There is none of thy kindred”
Syngéneia, the family as a whole, whose names a new son was expected to carry on.
“that is called by this name.”
A name with no family precedent, fitting for a child whose calling had no precedent either.
Luke 1:62
“And they made signs to his father,”
Enneúō, to nod or gesture. Zacharias had been unable to speak since the temple (Luke 1:20).
“how he would have him called.”
Thélō, his will or choice. The father had the final say over the name.
Luke 1:63
“And he asked for a writing table,”
Aitéō, a deliberate request. The pinakidion was a small, usually wax-coated wooden tablet.
“and wrote, saying, His name is John.”
Gráphō, to write. The father’s written word agrees with the mother and the angel and ends the matter.
“And they marvelled all.”
Thaumázō, to wonder or be astonished, and everyone present did.
Luke 1:64 This verse
“And his mouth was opened immediately,”
Anoígō, opened, and parachrēma, at once. The silence ended the moment he obeyed.
“and his tongue loosed,”
His speech came back whole after the months of silence.
“and he spake, and praised God.”
Eulogéō, to bless or speak well of. His first words are praise, and they lead into the Benedictus (Luke 1:68).
Luke 1:65
“And fear came on all that dwelt round about them:”
Phóbos with gínomai: reverent awe came upon the neighbourhood at what God had done.
“and all these sayings were noised abroad”
Dialaléō, talked over throughout. The rhēma are the whole story of the birth, the name and the restored voice.
“throughout all the hill country of Judaea.”
The high country of Judaea where the family lived, which Mary had visited (Luke 1:39).
Luke 1:66
“And all they that heard them laid them up in their hearts,”
The kardía is the inner person. They kept and pondered these things, as Mary did (Luke 2:19).
“saying, What manner of child shall this be!”
Wonder and expectation that God had a special purpose for him.
“And the hand of the Lord was with him.”
Luke’s own word: the cheír of the kýrios, God’s power, presence and protection, was on John from infancy.
Last revised