TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Kings 22:41–53.
Here is, I. A short account of the reign of Jehoshaphat king of Judah, of which we shall have a much fuller narrative in the book of Chronicles, and of the greatness and goodness of that prince, neither of which was lessened or sullied by any thing but his intimacy with the house of Ahab, which, upon several accounts, was a diminution to him. His confederacy with Ahab in war we have already found dangerous to him, and his confederacy with Ahaziah his son in trade sped no better. He offered to go partner with him in a fleet of merchant-ships, that should fetch gold from Ophir, as Solomon's navy did, Kg1 22:49. See Ch2 20:35, Ch2 20:36. But, while they were preparing to set sail, they were exceedingly damaged and disabled by a storm (broken at Ezion-geber), which a prophet gave Jehoshaphat to understand was a rebuke to him for his league with wicked Ahaziah (Ch2 20:37); and therefore, as we are told here (Kg1 22:49), when Ahaziah desired a second time to be a partner with him, or, if that could not be obtained, that he might but send his servants with some effects of board Jehoshaphat's ships, he refused: Jehoshaphat would not. The rod of God, expounded by the word of God, had effectually broken him off from his confederacy with that ungodly unhappy prince. Better buy wisdom dear than be without it; but experience is therefore said to be the mistress of fools because those are fools that will not learn till they are taught by experience, and particularly till they are taught the danger of associating with wicked people. Now Jehoshaphat's reign appears here to have been none of the longest, but one of the best. 1. It was none of the longest, for he reigned but twenty-five years (Kg1 22:42), but then it was in the prime of his time, between thirty-five and sixty, and these twenty-five, added to his father's happy forty-one, give us a grateful idea of the flourishing condition of the kingdom of Judah, and of religion in it, for a great while, even when things were very bad, upon all accounts, in the kingdom of Israel. If Jehoshaphat reigned not so long as his father, to balance this he had not those blemishes on the latter end of his reign that his father had (Ch2 16:9, Ch2 16:10, Ch2 16:12), and it is better for a man that has been in reputation for wisdom and honour to die in the midst of it than to outlive it. 2. Yet is was one of the best, both in respect of piety and prosperity. (1.) He did well: He did that which was right in the eyes of the Lord (Kg1 22:43), observed the commands of his God, and trod in the steps of his good father; and he persevered therein: He turned not aside from it. Yet every man's character has some but or other, so had his; the high places were not taken away, no not out of Judah and Benjamin, though those tribes lay so near Jerusalem that they might easily bring their offerings and incense to the altar there, and could not pretend, as some other of the tribes, the inconveniency of lying remote. But old corruptions are with difficulty rooted out, especially when they have formerly had the patronage of those that were good, as the high places had of Samuel, Solomon, and some others. (2.) His affairs did well. He prevented the mischiefs which had attended their wars with the kingdom of Israel, establishing a lasting peace (Kg1 22:44), which would have been a greater blessing if he had contented himself with a peace, and not carried it on to an affinity with Israel; he put a deputy, or viceroy, in Edom, so that the kingdom was tributary to him (Kg1 22:47), and therein the prophecy concerning Esau and Jacob was fulfilled, that the elder should serve the younger. And, in general, mention is made of his might and his wars, Kg1 22:45. He pleased God, and God blessed him with strength and success. His death is spoken of (Kg1 22:50), to shut up his story, yet, in the history of the kings of Israel, we find mention of him afterwards, Kg2 3:7.
II.The beginning of the story of Ahaziah the son of Ahab, Kg1 22:51-53.
His reign was very short, not two years. Some sinners God makes quick work with. It is a very bad character that is here given him. He not only kept up Jeroboam's idolatry, but the worship of Baal likewise; though he had heard of the ruin of Jeroboam's family, and had seen his own father drawn into destruction by the prophets of Baal, who had often been proved false prophets, yet he received no instruction, took no warning, but followed the example of his wicked father and the counsel of his more wicked mother Jezebel, who was still living. Miserable are the children that not only derive a stock of corruption from their parents, but are thus taught by them to trade with it; and unhappy, most unhappy parents, are those that help to damn their children's souls.
Continue studying 1 Kings 22:48 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
1 Kings 22:48 succinctly chronicles King Jehoshaphat's ambitious, yet ultimately futile, maritime endeavor to procure gold from Ophir. This verse, presented as a concise historical annotation within the broader narrative of his reign, not only highlights the king's pursuit of economic prosperity but, more profoundly, subtly foreshadows the divine judgment that would fall upon his reign due to compromised alliances, thereby underscoring the inherent fragility of human endeavors when not fully aligned with God's perfect will and wisdom.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is situated near the conclusion of King Jehoshaphat's reign, immediately following the detailed account of his ill-advised military alliance with Ahab, the wicked king of Israel, in the disastrous battle of Ramoth-Gilead (1 Kings 22:1-40). Despite Jehoshaphat's generally righteous character and his earnest efforts to promote the worship of Yahweh in Judah (as detailed in 2 Chronicles 17), his persistent tendency to form political and commercial alliances with the idolatrous kings of Israel consistently brought him into peril and incurred divine displeasure. This specific commercial enterprise, though seemingly a venture for economic gain, is presented as another instance where Jehoshaphat's judgment was flawed, ultimately leading to a complete failure. The parallel and more explicit account in 2 Chronicles 20:35-37 directly attributes the destruction of the ships to divine judgment, explicitly stating it was "because you have joined yourself with Ahaziah," Ahab's son, who "did very wickedly."
Historical & Cultural Context
King Jehoshaphat ruled over the Southern Kingdom of Judah from approximately 870 to 845 BC. His attempt to launch a maritime expedition for gold from Ophir intentionally echoes the immensely successful ventures of King Solomon, who, centuries prior, had amassed vast wealth through similar expeditions originating from Eziongeber (1 Kings 9:26-28). Eziongeber was a strategically vital port city located at the northern tip of the Gulf of Aqaba, an arm of the Red Sea, making it a crucial nexus for trade routes extending into the Arabian Peninsula and potentially further east. The phrase "ships of Tharshish" (or Tarshish) in this context did not necessarily imply that the ships were destined for or originated from the distant city of Tarshish in Spain. Instead, it referred to a specific class of large, sturdy, deep-sea vessels capable of undertaking long-distance voyages and carrying substantial cargo, thus signifying a highly ambitious and significant undertaking on Jehoshaphat's part. Ophir itself was a legendary, though geographically uncertain, source of immense quantities of gold, along with other precious commodities like almug wood and precious stones, making it an exceptionally coveted trade destination in the ancient Near East.
Key Themes
The narrative surrounding Jehoshaphat's reign, particularly this incident, powerfully illustrates several enduring theological themes. Firstly, it highlights the severe consequences of unholy alliances, demonstrating that even a generally righteous king like Jehoshaphat could face divine displeasure and practical failure when compromising with wickedness and idolatry (2 Chronicles 19:2). Secondly, it underscores the fragility and transience of earthly wealth and human ambition. Despite Jehoshaphat's considerable investment and grand plans for national prosperity, the ships were utterly destroyed before they could even embark on their journey, emphasizing that material pursuits are ultimately subject to divine sovereignty and often prove fleeting (Proverbs 27:1). Finally, the incident subtly yet profoundly points to divine sovereignty over human plans, revealing that God's overarching purposes ultimately prevail, even through the thwarting of well-intentioned but misguided human endeavors (Proverbs 16:9).
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
The name of the king of Judah, meaning "Jehovah-judged" or "Yahweh has judged." This etymology is particularly poignant in the context of this verse, as the failure of his enterprise is explicitly linked to divine judgment in the parallel account, underscoring that God indeed judged his actions, particularly his alliances.
A famed, though geographically debated, region renowned in the ancient world for its exceptionally abundant supply of high-quality gold, as well as other precious commodities like almug wood and precious stones. Its mention here signifies the immense wealth and prestige associated with successful trade expeditions to this fabled land, echoing the unparalleled prosperity achieved during Solomon's reign through similar ventures.
This verb means "to burst," "to break (down, off, in pieces, up)," or "to crush." In this context, it denotes a complete and catastrophic destruction of the ships. The passive voice emphasizes that the ships were acted upon, implying an external force, which the parallel account clarifies as divine intervention. The swift and total nature of this "breaking" highlights the immediate and undeniable failure of the entire enterprise.
Verse Breakdown
"Jehoshaphat made ships of Tharshish"
This clause establishes King Jehoshaphat's proactive and significant involvement in initiating and funding this ambitious commercial enterprise. The construction of "ships of Tharshish" (large, ocean-going vessels) indicates a substantial investment of national resources, labor, and time, reflecting his desire to emulate the economic success of previous kings, particularly Solomon, and to bolster Judah's wealth and international standing.
"to go to Ophir for gold"
This specifies the clear and singular objective of the expedition: to acquire gold from the fabled and highly coveted land of Ophir. This pursuit of material wealth was a common ambition for ancient monarchs, as gold symbolized immense power, national prosperity, and prestige. The phrase highlights the king's focus on external, tangible riches as a source of strength.
"but they went not; for the ships were broken at Eziongeber"
This crucial concluding clause introduces a stark contrast and reveals the immediate and complete failure of the venture. The concise declaration "but they went not" underscores the utter futility of the entire effort, as the expedition never even commenced. The reason provided, "for the ships were broken at Eziongeber," indicates a catastrophic event that occurred at their home port. The parallel account in 2 Chronicles 20:37 clarifies that this destruction was not an accident but a direct act of divine judgment, prophesied by the prophet Eliezer, due to Jehoshaphat's unholy alliance with Ahaziah, the wicked king of Israel.
Literary Devices
1 Kings 22:48 employs several subtle but potent literary devices. There is a profound sense of Irony in Jehoshaphat's ambitious pursuit of wealth being immediately and utterly thwarted at the very outset. He invests heavily in grand ships for a lucrative voyage, only for them to be destroyed before leaving port, highlighting the futility of human endeavors when not aligned with divine favor. The verse also functions as a form of Foreshadowing within the broader narrative of Jehoshaphat's reign. Although the precise reason for the destruction is not explicitly stated here (it is in the parallel account in 2 Chronicles 20:37), the immediate and complete failure hints at a divine hand, subtly suggesting that not all human plans, even those of a generally righteous king, will prosper, especially when compromised by ungodly alliances. Furthermore, the "broken ships" can be seen as Symbolism for the brokenness, futility, and divine judgment that result from unholy alliances and a misplaced trust in earthly ventures over divine wisdom and integrity.
Theological and Thematic Connections
The account of Jehoshaphat's failed maritime expedition serves as a powerful theological lesson on the absolute sovereignty of God over human ambition and the severe consequences of spiritual compromise. Despite Jehoshaphat's generally good character and his commendable efforts to reform Judah and promote true worship, his repeated willingness to forge alliances with wicked, idolatrous kings like Ahab and Ahaziah consistently led him into trouble and incurred divine disapproval. This incident vividly demonstrates that even well-intentioned economic pursuits can be subject to God's direct judgment if they are rooted in or facilitated by ungodly partnerships. It profoundly underscores the biblical principle that true prosperity, security, and lasting success come not from worldly ventures pursued in disobedience or compromise, but from aligning completely with God's will and maintaining spiritual integrity. God's active intervention, even to the point of destroying ships, reveals His unwavering role in directing the affairs of nations and individuals, ensuring that His righteous purposes ultimately prevail and that His people learn the critical importance of walking in faithful obedience.
Reflection and Application
The narrative of Jehoshaphat's broken ships provides profound and enduring lessons for believers today. It challenges us to deeply examine the motivations, methods, and partnerships behind our own ambitions, whether in our professional careers, ministry endeavors, or personal relationships. We are called to earnestly seek God's guidance and blessing in all our undertakings, understanding that not every opportunity, no matter how lucrative or promising it appears, is necessarily aligned with His perfect will or conducive to our spiritual flourishing. The swift and complete failure of Jehoshaphat's grand venture serves as a potent and sobering reminder of the transient nature of earthly riches and the inherent futility of pursuing them outside of God's leading or in compromise with ungodly influences. It compels us to prioritize spiritual integrity, discerning relationships, and faithful obedience over worldly gain or temporary advantage. Ultimately, our true security and lasting treasure are found not in what we accumulate or achieve in this life, but in our unwavering relationship with the Lord and our steadfast obedience to His commands. We must cultivate a deeper trust in God's sovereignty, recognizing that His providence extends even to the thwarting of our meticulously laid plans, often for our protection, correction, or redirection to a path that is more glorifying to Him.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why were Jehoshaphat's ships broken at Eziongeber, and what is the significance of this failure?
While 1 Kings 22:48 states simply that the ships "went not; for the ships were broken at Eziongeber," the parallel and more explicit account in 2 Chronicles 20:35-37 provides the crucial theological explanation. The prophet Eliezer, son of Dodavah of Mareshah, rebuked Jehoshaphat for his unholy alliance with Ahaziah, king of Israel, who "did very wickedly." Eliezer declared, "Because you have joined yourself with Ahaziah, the Lord has destroyed your works." Therefore, the destruction of the ships was not a mere accident or natural disaster but a direct act of divine judgment, a consequence of Jehoshaphat's spiritual compromise and his association with a wicked king. The profound significance of this event lies in its demonstration of God's active sovereignty over human endeavors, particularly when those endeavors are tainted by spiritual compromise or disobedience. It powerfully underscores that even a righteous king's plans can be thwarted by God when they involve association with wickedness, serving as a potent warning against being "unequally yoked" (2 Corinthians 6:14).
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The narrative of Jehoshaphat's failed pursuit of earthly gold, thwarted by divine judgment due to his compromised alliances, finds profound Christ-centered fulfillment. Jehoshaphat's ambition to secure wealth and stability through human means, ultimately ending in brokenness and futility, stands in stark contrast to Christ, who is the true and everlasting treasure. While Jehoshaphat sought perishable gold from Ophir, Jesus Christ offers imperishable riches, eternal life, and the true wealth of God's kingdom (Matthew 6:19-21). The broken ships at Eziongeber symbolize the futility of human efforts and the devastating consequences of spiritual compromise, pointing to the perfect obedience of Christ, whose redemptive work was never "broken" but perfectly accomplished on the cross, securing our complete and eternal redemption (John 19:30). Unlike Jehoshaphat, who repeatedly leaned on worldly alliances and suffered the consequences, Christ is the faithful King who never compromises with sin, and in Him, all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge are hidden, freely available to those who believe (Colossians 2:3). Our true "gold" is not found in distant lands or fleeting earthly ventures, but in the person of Jesus Christ, who is our ultimate provision, our unshakable security, and the perfect fulfillment of all our righteous desires (Philippians 3:7-8). He is the one in whom all things hold together, and through whom God's purposes are perfectly achieved (Colossians 1:17).