TRV
- English
- King James KJV
- Complete Jewish CJB
- World English WEBM
- Berean Standard BSB
- American Standard ASV
- Geneva GNV
- Young's Literal YLT
- Douay-Rheims DRC
- International
- Shqip ALB
- العربية SVD
- বাংলা BN-IRV
- မြန်မာ Judson
- 简体文 CUV-S
- 繁體中文 CUV-T
- Čeština BKR
- Nederlands STVE
- Français LSG
- Deutsch SCH
- Ελληνικά Vamvas
- ગુજરાતી GU-IRV
- Hausa HCB
- עברית Hebrew
- हिन्दी HCV
- Magyar KAROLI
- Bahasa Indonesia INDO-TB
- Italiano Diodati
- 日本語 Kougo
- 한국어 Korean
- മലയാളം MAL
- मराठी MRCV
- Norsk DNB
- فارسی OPV
- Polski BG
- Português Almeida
- Română Cornilescu
- Русский Synodal
- Español RVG
- Kiswahili Neno
- Svenska SV1917
- Tagalog TAG-ADB
- தமிழ் TCV
- తెలుగు TSA
- ภาษาไทย THAI-KJV
- Українська Ohienko
- Tiếng Việt CADMAN
- Yorùbá YCB
See on the biblical-era map
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 2 Chronicles 20:31–37.
We are now drawing towards the close of the history of Jehoshaphat's reign, for a further account of which those who lived when this book was published were referred to an authentic history of it, written by Jehu the prophet (Ch2 19:2), which was then extant, Ch2 20:34. This was the general character of his reign, that he did that which was right in the sight of the Lord, kept close to the worship of God himself and did what he could to keep his people close to it. But two things are here to be lamented: - 1. The people still retained a partiality for the high places, Ch2 20:33. Those that were erected to the honour of strange gods were taken away (Ch2 17:6); but those where the true God was worshipped, being less culpable, were thought allowable, and Jehoshaphat was loth to disoblige the people so far as to take them away, for as yet they had not prepared their hearts to serve the God of their fathers. They complied with Jehoshaphat's reformation because they could not for shame do otherwise, but they were not hearty in it, did not direct their hearts to God in it, did not act in it from any good principle nor with any zeal or resolution: and the best magistrates cannot bring to pass what they would, in reformation, when the people are cool in it. 2. Jehoshaphat himself still retained a partiality for the house of Ahab, because he had married his son to a daughter of that family, though he had been plainly reproved for it and had like to have smarted for it. He saw and knew that Ahaziah, the son of Ahab, did very wickedly, and therefore could not expect to prosper; yet he joined himself with him, not in war, as with his father, but in trade, became his partner in an East India fleet bound for Ophir, Ch2 20:35, Ch2 20:36. There is an emphasis laid upon the time - after this, after God had done such great things for him, without any such scandalous and pernicious confederacies, given him not only victory, but wealth, yet after this to go and join himself with a wicked king was very ungrateful. After God had given him such a deliverance as this should he again break God's commandments, and join in affinity with the people of these abominations? What could he expect but that God should be angry with him? Ezr 9:13, Ezr 9:14. Yet he sends to him, to show him his error and bring him to repentance, (1.) By a prophet, who foretold the blasting of his project, Ch2 20:37. And, (2.) By a storm, which broke the ships in the port before they set sail, by which he was warned to break off his alliance with Ahaziah; and it seems he took the warning, for, when Ahaziah afterwards pressed him to join with him, he would not, Kg1 22:49. See how pernicious a thing it is to join in friendship and society with evil-doers. It is a hard matter to break off from it. A man may much better keep himself from being taken in the snare than recover himself out of it.
Continue studying 2 Chronicles 20:37 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Second Chronicles 20:37 records the solemn prophetic declaration delivered by Eliezer, son of Dodavah, against King Jehoshaphat of Judah. This divine pronouncement meticulously explains the catastrophic failure of Jehoshaphat's ambitious naval enterprise: the ships, meticulously constructed for a lucrative voyage to Tarshish, were utterly shattered. The prophet unequivocally attributes this disaster to Jehoshaphat's ill-advised and spiritually compromising alliance with Ahaziah, the wicked king of Israel, thereby underscoring God's unwavering disapproval of unholy partnerships and spiritual compromise, even when engaged in by an otherwise generally righteous monarch.
Context
Literary Context
This verse serves as a climactic conclusion to a significant episode in Jehoshaphat's reign, immediately following the description of his joint shipping venture with Ahaziah, king of Israel, detailed in 2 Chronicles 20:35-36. It stands in striking theological and narrative contrast to the preceding account of God's miraculous deliverance of Judah from the Moabite and Ammonite invasion, a victory achieved through Jehoshaphat's profound faith, prayer, and worship, as recounted in 2 Chronicles 20:1-30. While Jehoshaphat consistently demonstrates remarkable faith and leadership in times of national crisis, his persistent weakness for forming alliances with the idolatrous northern kingdom of Israel is a recurring and problematic theme throughout his reign. He had previously allied with Ahaziah's father, Ahab, for a military campaign, for which he received a severe prophetic rebuke from Jehu, son of Hanani (see 2 Chronicles 19:2). This repeated pattern highlights a crucial flaw in an otherwise commendable reign, demonstrating that even seemingly good intentions, such as fostering economic prosperity, cannot justify spiritual compromise. The destruction of the ships is thus presented as a direct, immediate, and tangible divine consequence, reinforcing the Chronicler's overarching theological emphasis on prompt retribution for both obedience and disobedience within the covenant.
Historical & Cultural Context
King Jehoshaphat (c. 870-846 BC) was a generally righteous and influential king of Judah, renowned for his extensive religious reforms, the establishment of an organized judicial system, and his significant military strength. In stark contrast, Ahaziah (c. 850-849 BC) was the son of the notorious Ahab and Jezebel, and he continued their legacy of Baal worship and profound wickedness in Israel. The proposed joint venture to Tarshish, launched from Ezion-geber (a vital Red Sea port located on the Gulf of Aqaba), indicates an ambitious attempt to engage in lucrative long-distance maritime trade, likely seeking valuable metals such as silver and gold. Such voyages were exceedingly ambitious, costly, and required considerable resources and specialized expertise for their time. Historically, "Tarshish" is often identified with a distant port, possibly in modern-day Spain, known for its immense wealth and extensive trade networks. However, the alliance itself fundamentally crossed a critical religious and cultural boundary. For a king like Jehoshaphat, who was deeply committed to Yahweh worship and the Mosaic covenant, forming such a deep and intimate partnership with an idolatrous king like Ahaziah constituted a direct violation of the covenant principles of separation and holiness, even if it promised significant economic benefit.
Key Themes
The primary theological message powerfully conveyed in this verse and its immediate context is the severe consequences of unholy alliances. Despite Jehoshaphat's overall faithfulness to Yahweh, his repeated willingness to "join himself" with the wicked kings of Israel consistently brought divine disfavor and tangible loss. This incident serves as a potent illustration of divine judgment and intervention, demonstrating God's active and direct involvement in human affairs and His absolute intolerance for spiritual compromise within His covenant people. The destruction of the ships was not an accidental occurrence or a mere natural disaster but a direct, targeted act of the Lord, serving as an unmistakable sign of His displeasure. Furthermore, the presence and pronouncement of Eliezer, the prophet, highlight the crucial theme of prophetic warning and explanation. God does not act arbitrarily but consistently communicates His will and the underlying reasons for His actions through His chosen messengers, providing clarity, accountability, and an opportunity for repentance. This narrative also powerfully reinforces the broader biblical principle of God's holiness and the necessity of separation for His people, unequivocally emphasizing that spiritual integrity and covenant faithfulness must always take precedence over any perceived material or political advantages, a theme frequently echoed throughout the Old Testament, such as in Deuteronomy 7:1-6, and later profoundly reaffirmed in the New Testament.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This verb (H5012) signifies speaking under direct divine inspiration, delivering a message that originates directly from God. It emphasizes that Eliezer's words were not merely human opinion, political commentary, or personal speculation, but an authoritative and binding declaration of the Lord's will and judgment. The prophet functions as God's authentic mouthpiece, ensuring that the king and the people understand the divine origin and profound gravity of the message, leaving no room for misinterpretation regarding its source or authority.
This verb (H2266) means to bind, unite, or associate closely, implying a deep, intentional, and often intimate partnership or alliance, rather than a casual or superficial encounter. The use of this specific word highlights the problematic and profound nature of Jehoshaphat's relationship with Ahaziah, indicating a level of intimacy, shared purpose, and common endeavor that directly violated God's command for His people to remain distinct and separated from idolatrous nations and their practices. It suggests a fusion of interests and a blurring of spiritual boundaries that God found utterly unacceptable.
This strong verb (H7665) means to shatter, break into pieces, or utterly destroy. It conveys a sense of complete, decisive, and irreversible destruction, rendering the ships entirely unusable for their intended purpose. The passive voice ("the ships were broken") strongly implies divine agency, reinforcing the preceding prophetic declaration that "the LORD hath broken thy works." This was not a random accident, a natural storm, or a structural failure, but a direct, targeted, and intentional act of God's judgment, ensuring the complete and unequivocal failure of the compromised venture.
Verse Breakdown
"Then Eliezer the son of Dodavah of Mareshah prophesied against Jehoshaphat, saying"
This opening clause meticulously introduces the divine messenger and the specific recipient of the prophecy. Eliezer, identified by his lineage and hometown (Mareshah, a town in Judah), is presented as God's chosen and authorized instrument to deliver a direct, confrontational, and divinely inspired message to King Jehoshaphat. His role here powerfully underscores the consistent theological theme prevalent in the book of Chronicles: God actively communicates with His kings through prophets, holding them directly accountable for their actions and choices.
"Because thou hast joined thyself with Ahaziah, the LORD hath broken thy works"
This is the theological core of the prophecy, articulating with absolute clarity the precise reason for God's judgment and explicitly identifying the divine agent. Jehoshaphat's deliberate alliance ("joined thyself") with Ahaziah, the notoriously wicked king of Israel, is unequivocally named as the direct cause of the impending disaster. The powerful declaration "the LORD hath broken thy works" directly attributes the failure of the enterprise to God's active, personal intervention, making it abundantly clear that the destruction of the shipping venture is a direct, inescapable consequence of the king's disobedience and spiritual compromise. "Thy works" refers specifically to the entire commercial enterprise undertaken in partnership with Ahaziah.
"And the ships were broken, that they were not able to go to Tarshish"
This concluding clause describes the immediate, tangible, and specific outcome of God's judgment. The ships, which had been meticulously constructed and prepared for a potentially lucrative voyage to the distant port of Tarshish, were rendered utterly unusable. The destruction was so complete and decisive ("that they were not able to go") that the entire ambitious commercial endeavor was thwarted and brought to nothing. This demonstrates the effectiveness, precision, and thoroughness of God's judgment, directly targeting and dismantling the very fruit of the unholy alliance, thereby preventing its success.
Literary Devices
The primary literary device at play in 2 Chronicles 20:37 is Prophecy, where Eliezer functions as a direct conduit for God's authoritative word, delivering a specific message of divine judgment. This prophecy is structured as a clear Cause and Effect statement, explicitly linking Jehoshaphat's action of "joining himself with Ahaziah" to the divine consequence: "the LORD hath broken thy works." This direct and undeniable correlation underscores the fundamental biblical principle of divine retribution for disobedience, a foundational theological theme consistently emphasized throughout the Chronicler's work. Furthermore, the passage powerfully employs Divine Intervention, portraying God as an active, sovereign agent in human affairs, directly intervening to thwart the plans and endeavors of kings when they deviate from His holy will. The destruction of the ships is thus presented not as a natural disaster or an unfortunate accident, but as a precise and targeted act of God's judgment. There is also a subtle yet poignant Irony embedded within the narrative: Jehoshaphat, a king who generally sought the Lord and had recently experienced miraculous deliverance, repeatedly falls into the same pattern of compromising alliances, and his pursuit of material gain through ungodly means ultimately results in significant material loss.
Theological and Thematic Connections
The account of Eliezer's prophecy and the subsequent destruction of Jehoshaphat's ships serves as a profound theological statement about God's absolute holiness and His unwavering intolerance for spiritual compromise among His covenant people. It underscores that while God is indeed merciful, gracious, and slow to anger, He is also perfectly just and demands uncompromising obedience, particularly concerning the purity, distinctiveness, and spiritual integrity of His covenant community. Even a king like Jehoshaphat, who generally walked faithfully in the ways of the Lord and experienced great blessings and miraculous deliverance, faced direct divine discipline when he allowed pragmatic considerations or the pursuit of worldly gain to override the clear divine command to remain separate from ungodly influences. This narrative powerfully teaches that true prosperity and enduring success, from God's eternal perspective, are fundamentally rooted in faithful obedience and unwavering spiritual integrity, not in alliances or endeavors that compromise one's commitment to Him. God's direct intervention powerfully demonstrates His ultimate sovereignty over all human endeavors and His unyielding commitment to upholding His divine standards, even if it means thwarting well-intentioned but misguided human plans.
Reflection and Application
The narrative of Jehoshaphat's broken ships offers a timeless and profoundly relevant lesson for believers today, compelling us to critically examine the nature of our associations and partnerships. This applies to every sphere of life: business ventures, personal relationships, educational pursuits, and even ministry collaborations. Just as Jehoshaphat's alliance with Ahaziah brought divine disfavor and the ruin of his ambitious enterprise, so too can our compromises with worldly values, ungodly influences, or unbiblical practices lead to spiritual barrenness, frustrating endeavors, and a discernible lack of God's blessing on our efforts. The passage challenges us to prioritize spiritual integrity and unwavering obedience to God's commands for separation and holiness above any perceived material advantage, social acceptance, or pragmatic benefit. It serves as a stark reminder that God's ways are infinitely higher than our ways, and His divine wisdom far surpasses our most astute human calculations. True, lasting success, from a divine perspective, is found not in worldly alliances but in walking humbly with God, trusting implicitly in His provision, and steadfastly refusing to dilute our faith or compromise our convictions for the sake of fleeting worldly gain.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was Jehoshaphat, a generally good king, punished for this alliance?
While Jehoshaphat was indeed largely a righteous king who initiated significant religious reforms and consistently sought the Lord, his repeated alliances with the idolatrous kings of Israel (first Ahab, then Ahaziah) represented a profound spiritual compromise. God's holiness demands a clear separation from wickedness and idolatry, and even good intentions (such as pursuing economic prosperity or political stability) cannot justify disobedience to this fundamental covenant principle. The "punishment" in this context was not an act of condemnation leading to eternal damnation, but rather divine discipline, lovingly intended to correct Jehoshaphat and to teach him (and, by extension, future generations) the paramount importance of spiritual purity and unwavering trust in God alone. It powerfully demonstrates that God holds His leaders to a high standard and that even His most faithful servants are not exempt from the tangible consequences of their choices when they deviate from His perfect will, as also seen in the parallel account in 1 Kings 22:48-49.
What was the purpose of the ships going to Tarshish?
The ships were intended for a grand commercial voyage, likely for lucrative long-distance trade. Tarshish was a renowned and distant port, frequently associated in ancient literature with rich mineral resources (such as silver, iron, tin, and lead) and extensive, profitable trade routes. The venture, launched from Ezion-geber, a vital Red Sea port, suggests a significant commercial ambition to expand Judah's wealth and influence through maritime trade, potentially bypassing traditional land routes and establishing a new economic frontier. This was a substantial and costly economic undertaking, and its dramatic failure due to direct divine intervention powerfully highlighted God's absolute sovereignty over even the most ambitious and meticulously planned human endeavors.
Is there a parallel account of this event in other biblical books?
Yes, a parallel account of this event is found in 1 Kings 22:48-49. While both accounts largely agree on the destruction of the ships and Jehoshaphat's involvement, there is a slight difference in the specific details and emphasis. 1 Kings 22:48 states that "Jehoshaphat made ships of Tarshish to go to Tarshish for gold: but they went not; for the ships were broken at Ezion-geber." This account does not explicitly mention Ahaziah's direct involvement in the building of the ships, nor does it include Eliezer's prophecy as the explicit reason for their breaking, though it does mention Ahaziah's desire to send his servants with Jehoshaphat's. 2 Chronicles 20:36-37 clarifies that Jehoshaphat "joined himself with Ahaziah" in the making of the ships and explicitly attributes their destruction to Eliezer's prophecy against this unholy alliance, thereby providing the crucial theological rationale for the event. The Chronicler's emphasis on the prophetic word and the divine reason for the breaking aligns perfectly with his broader theological agenda of highlighting the direct consequences of obedience and disobedience within the covenant.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The narrative of Jehoshaphat's compromised alliance and the subsequent divine judgment on his works finds profound and multi-faceted Christ-centered fulfillment. While Jehoshaphat, representing a type of the flawed human king, repeatedly fell into the spiritual trap of unholy alliances, Jesus Christ perfectly embodied absolute and unwavering separation from sin and compromise. He lived a life of impeccable and unwavering obedience to the Father, never "joining Himself" with the world's corrupt systems or its ungodly ways, even when intensely tempted by promises of worldly power or earthly gain (see Matthew 4:1-11). The "breaking" of Jehoshaphat's works serves as a powerful shadow and prefigurement of the ultimate judgment on sin that Christ bore on the cross. On the cross, Jesus was profoundly "broken" for us (as prophesied in Isaiah 53:5), taking upon Himself the full weight of divine wrath against all human compromise, sin, and rebellion. He did this so that those who are "joined" to Him by faith would not have their works broken by divine judgment, but rather made fruitful and eternally enduring. Through our spiritual union with Christ, we are called to be a people set apart, holy, and distinct from the world, explicitly warned not to be unequally yoked with unbelievers (as powerfully articulated in 2 Corinthians 6:14). Our "Tarshish" is no longer the pursuit of fleeting earthly wealth through compromised means, but the faithful advancement of God's eternal kingdom and the glorification of Christ through lives of unwavering obedience and genuine spiritual integrity, knowing with absolute certainty that in Him, all our true "works" are blessed, purified, and will ultimately endure for eternity (see 1 Corinthians 3:12-14).