Lumaktaw sa nilalaman

Joshua 13:14

“The Inheritance East of the Jordan”· Joshua 13:8–14Read in context
King James Version
Only unto the tribe of Levi he gave none inheritance; the sacrifices of the LORD God of Israel made by fire are their inheritance, as he said unto them.
KJV (with Strong's)
Only unto the tribe H7626 of Levi H3878 he gave H5414 none inheritance H5159; the sacrifices H801 of the LORD H3068 God H430 of Israel H3478 made by fire H801 are their inheritance H5159, as he said H1696 unto them.
Complete Jewish Bible
Only to the tribe of Levi did Moshe give no inheritance; because the offerings made by fire for ADONAI the God of Isra'el are its inheritance; as [ADONAI] had said to Moshe.
Berean Standard Bible
To the tribe of Levi, however, Moses had given no inheritance. The offerings made by fire to the LORD, the God of Israel, are their inheritance, just as He had promised them.
American Standard Version
Only unto the tribe of Levi he gave no inheritance; the offerings of Jehovah, the God of Israel, made by fire are his inheritance, as he spake unto him.
World English Bible Messianic
Only he gave no inheritance to the tribe of Levi. The offerings of the LORD, the God of Israel, made by fire are his inheritance, as he spoke to him.
Geneva Bible (1599)
Onely vnto the tribe of Leui he gaue none inheritance, but the sacrifices of the Lord God of Israel are his inheritance, as he said vnto him.
Young's Literal Translation
Only, to the tribe of Levi he hath not given an inheritance; fire-offerings of Jehovah, God of Israel, is its inheritance, as He hath spoken to it.
Tagalog · ADB
Ang lipi lamang ni Levi ang hindi niya binigyan ng mana; ang mga handog sa Panginoon, sa Dios ng Israel na pinaraan sa apoy ay siyang kaniyang mana, gaya ng sinalita niya sa kaniya.
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 6,169 of 31,102 · 19.8%

Study this verse

Summary

Joshua 13:14 provides a pivotal clarification regarding the land distribution to the Israelite tribes, specifically addressing the unique status of the tribe of Levi. While the other tribes received territorial inheritances in Canaan, the Levites were divinely designated to receive no land. Instead, their sustenance and patrimony were to come directly from "the sacrifices of the LORD God of Israel made by fire," thereby underscoring their distinct, consecrated role as ministers of the sanctuary and emphasizing God's direct faithfulness in providing for those wholly dedicated to His service and the spiritual well-being of the nation.

Context

Literary Context

This verse is strategically placed within the detailed account of the land distribution in the latter half of the book of Joshua, specifically in Joshua 13. At this juncture, Joshua is described as old and advanced in years, and God instructs him to commence the critical process of dividing the remaining unconquered land among the nine and a half tribes (Joshua 13:1). The preceding verses meticulously list the territories yet to be taken and delineate which tribes are slated to receive their inheritance (Joshua 13:2-13). Joshua 13:14 functions as a crucial parenthetical statement, interrupting the geographical descriptions to highlight the singular exception for the tribe of Levi. This reiteration of a long-standing divine decree regarding their unique status and provision sets them apart from the territorial allocations of the other tribes, emphasizing their distinct calling within the covenant community.

Historical & Cultural Context

In ancient Israelite society, land inheritance was of paramount importance. It was not merely an economic asset but a foundational element of identity, security, and a tangible fulfillment of God's covenant promises to Abraham and his descendants (Genesis 12:7). Each family and tribe was typically allotted a specific portion of the land, which was to be passed down through generations, ensuring their place and continuity within the nation. However, the tribe of Levi, descendants of Jacob's son Levi, was set apart for sacred service to Yahweh from the time of the Exodus. Their faithfulness during the golden calf incident (Exodus 32:26-29) and their subsequent consecration (Numbers 3:5-10) established their unique function as priests and temple servants. This distinct role meant they were not to be burdened with agricultural pursuits or territorial defense like the other tribes. Instead, their livelihood was intrinsically tied to the sacrificial system and the offerings brought by the other Israelites, ensuring their full dedication to their spiritual duties and their direct dependence on God's provision.

Key Themes

Joshua 13:14 powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Joshua and the broader Pentateuch. Firstly, it highlights the theme of Divine Provision and Faithfulness, demonstrating God's meticulous care for those consecrated to Him. It underscores His unwavering commitment to sustain the Levites directly from the offerings, fulfilling His promise to be their inheritance, as seen in Numbers 18:20-24. Secondly, the verse reinforces the Unique Priestly Role of the Levites, solidifying their distinct function as mediators between God and Israel, responsible for the tabernacle/temple service, teaching the Law, and administering the sacrificial system. Their lack of land inheritance was not a deficit but a divine designation that enabled their singular focus on spiritual duties. Finally, the concluding phrase "as he said unto them" underscores the theme of Fulfillment of God's Word, pointing back to earlier commands and promises concerning the Levites' inheritance, particularly in Deuteronomy 10:9 and Numbers 18:20, thereby emphasizing God's unwavering consistency and covenant fidelity.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Inheritance nachălâh' H5159

This term (H5159), typically referring to a landed possession or patrimony passed down through generations, takes on a unique and expanded meaning in the context of the Levites. While other tribes received a physical territory as their nachălâh, the Levites' "inheritance" was not a geographic plot but rather the "sacrifices of the LORD God of Israel made by fire." This redefinition signifies that their security, provision, and identity were not rooted in earthly possessions but directly in their relationship with and service to God, sustained by the offerings brought to Him. It represents a spiritual patrimony.

Sacrifices... made by fire ʼishshâh' H801

This term (H801) refers to the portions of the various offerings (e.g., burnt offerings, grain offerings, peace offerings, sin offerings) that were consumed by fire on the altar as an offering to God. Crucially, it also encompasses the portions designated by divine command for the priests and Levites to eat. These priestly portions, though "made by fire" in the sense of being part of the sacrificial system and presented to God, were the material means of the Levites' sustenance. This emphasizes that their livelihood came directly from God's altar, highlighting their intimate connection to the worship of Yahweh and their dependence on the offerings of the people as a sacred trust.

Said dâbar' H1696

This primitive root (H1696), meaning "to speak" or "to arrange," highlights the authoritative and deliberate nature of God's pronouncement concerning the Levites' inheritance. The phrase "as he said unto them" underscores that this arrangement was not an arbitrary decision or a new development, but a pre-ordained divine decree. It emphasizes God's consistent communication and the fulfillment of His previously declared will, reinforcing the reliability and immutability of His word.

Verse Breakdown

"Only unto the tribe of Levi he gave none inheritance;"

This initial clause establishes the unique exception for the Levites in the land distribution. It explicitly states that, unlike the other tribes who received a territorial share, the Levites were not allotted any portion of the land as a permanent, inheritable possession. This exclusion was not a punishment or oversight but a deliberate divine decree, setting them apart for a distinct purpose—a life dedicated entirely to the service of God and His people.

"the sacrifices of the LORD God of Israel made by fire [are] their inheritance, "

This clause defines what the Levites did receive as their "inheritance." Instead of land, their sustenance and provision came from the offerings presented to Yahweh. This refers to the specific portions of the various sacrifices that God commanded to be given to the priests and Levites for their food and upkeep (e.g., Numbers 18). This arrangement underscored their direct dependence on God and the people's faithfulness in bringing offerings, ensuring their ability to perform their sacred duties without distraction.

"as he said unto them."

This concluding phrase serves as a powerful affirmation of divine consistency and fidelity. It indicates that this unique arrangement for the Levites was not a new or arbitrary decision but a fulfillment of earlier commands and promises made by God himself, particularly those found in the books of Numbers and Deuteronomy. This highlights God's unwavering commitment to His covenant and His established order for the worship and service of His people, emphasizing the reliability of His word.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several significant literary devices that enrich its meaning. Contrast is prominently featured, highlighting the stark difference between the land inheritance of the other tribes and the non-land inheritance of Levi. This contrast serves to emphasize Levi's unique status, divine calling, and the distinct nature of their provision. The phrase "as he said unto them" functions as a Divine Decree or Fulfillment Motif, underscoring God's absolute authority and faithfulness in carrying out His pre-ordained plans. It ties the present reality of the land distribution back to past divine pronouncements, reinforcing the continuity and immutability of God's will. Furthermore, the concept of "sacrifices... made by fire" being an "inheritance" can be seen as a form of Metaphor or Redefinition, where the traditional understanding of a tangible, landed inheritance is transformed into a spiritual and relational one, rooted in divine provision through the very acts of worship and obedience.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Joshua 13:14 profoundly illustrates God's sovereign design for His people and His meticulous provision for those called to sacred service. It reveals that true security and inheritance are not necessarily found in earthly possessions but in a direct, dependent relationship with God and participation in His kingdom work. The Levites' unique provision from the altar offerings served as a constant reminder to all Israel that their worship and obedience directly sustained those who ministered on their behalf, fostering a communal responsibility for spiritual life. This principle extends beyond the Old Testament, teaching that God cares for His servants and that the community of faith has a role in supporting those dedicated to spiritual leadership and teaching, ensuring they are freed to focus on their divine calling.

Reflection and Application

Joshua 13:14 offers profound insights for believers today, reminding us that our ultimate inheritance is not in material wealth or earthly security, but in God Himself and the spiritual blessings He bestows. Just as the Levites were freed from worldly pursuits to focus entirely on God's service, believers are called to prioritize the Kingdom of God and His righteousness, trusting that He will provide for all our needs (Matthew 6:33). This verse challenges us to consider what we truly value as our "inheritance"—is it earthly gain, or is it the privilege of serving God and experiencing His direct provision? It also highlights the reciprocal relationship within the body of Christ: just as the Israelites supported the Levites through their offerings, believers today are called to generously support those who minister the Word and serve the church, enabling them to devote themselves fully to their calling. Our spiritual "offerings" of time, talent, and treasure contribute to the sustenance and flourishing of God's work in the world, reflecting our dependence on God and our commitment to His purposes.

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what ways do I tend to seek my "inheritance" or security in earthly possessions rather than in God's provision and calling?
  2. How does the Levites' dedication to service, unburdened by land, challenge my own priorities and commitments in my spiritual walk?
  3. What is my role in supporting those who are dedicated to full-time ministry or spiritual service in my community, and how can I do so more intentionally?

FAQ

Why did the tribe of Levi not receive a land inheritance like the other tribes of Israel?

The tribe of Levi did not receive a territorial land inheritance because they were uniquely consecrated by God for sacred service. From the time of the Exodus, particularly after their faithfulness during the golden calf incident (Exodus 32:26-29), the Levites were set apart to serve in the tabernacle and later the temple, ministering to the Lord and to the people of Israel. Their duties included carrying the ark, maintaining the sanctuary, performing sacrifices, teaching the Law, and leading worship. To ensure their full dedication to these spiritual responsibilities, God decreed that their "inheritance" would be the "sacrifices of the LORD God of Israel made by fire," meaning they would be sustained by the portions of the offerings brought by the other tribes (Numbers 18:20-24). This arrangement freed them from agricultural or territorial concerns, allowing them to focus entirely on their priestly and ministerial functions, thereby emphasizing their direct dependence on God's provision and the community's support as a testament to His faithfulness.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

The unique provision for the Levites in Joshua 13:14, where their inheritance was the "sacrifices of the LORD," finds its ultimate and profound fulfillment in Jesus Christ. The Levites, through their priestly service and reliance on the sacrificial system, foreshadowed the perfect and eternal High Priest, Jesus, who did not inherit earthly land but rather offered Himself as the ultimate "sacrifice of the LORD." His once-for-all sacrifice on the cross (Hebrews 9:26) abolished the need for the Levitical system, becoming the true and living way for humanity to approach God (Hebrews 10:19-20). Moreover, just as the Levites' sustenance came from the offerings, so too does our spiritual life and eternal "inheritance" come directly from Christ's finished work. He is our true portion, our spiritual sustenance, and the very essence of our eternal life (John 6:51). Through His perfect priesthood, Christ has granted believers an inheritance not of perishable land, but of eternal life, adoption into God's family, and a share in His divine nature (Ephesians 1:11; 1 Peter 1:4). In Christ, we are all made a "royal priesthood" (1 Peter 2:9), called to offer spiritual sacrifices of praise and service, finding our ultimate provision and purpose in Him, who is our all in all (Colossians 3:11).

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Joshua 13:7–33. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 27 verses
Passage under commentJoshua 13:7–33
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Here we have, I. Orders given to Joshua to assign to each tribe its portion of this land, including that which was yet unsubdued, which must be brought into the lot, in a believing confidence that it should be conquered when Israel was multiplied so as to have occasion for it (Jos 13:7): Now divide this land. Joshua thought all must be conquered before any must be divided. "No," said, God, "there is as much conquered as will serve your turn for the present; divide this, and make your best of it, and wait for the remainder hereafter." Note, We must take the comfort of what we have, though we cannot compass all we would have. Observe,

1.The land must be divided among the several tribes, and they must not always live in common, as now they did. Which way soever a just property is acquired, it is the will of that God who has given the earth to the children of men that there should be such a thing, and that every man should know his own, and not invade that which is another's. The world must be governed, not by force, but right, by the law of equity, not of arms.

2.That it must be divided for an inheritance, though they got it by conquest.

(1.)The promise of it came to them as an inheritance from their fathers; the land of promise pertained to the children of promise, who were thus beloved for their fathers' sakes, and in performance of the covenant with them.

(2.)The possession of it was to be transmitted by them, as an inheritance to their children. Frequently, what is got by force is soon lost again; but Israel, having an incontestable title to this land by the divine grant, might see it hereby secured as an inheritance to their seed after them, and that God kept this mercy for thousands.

3.That Joshua must not divide it by his own will. Though he was a very wise, just, and good man, it must not be left to him to give what he pleased to each tribe; but he must do it by lot, which referred the matter wholly to God, and to his determination, for he it is that appoints the bounds of our habitation, and every man's judgment must proceed from him. But Joshua must preside in this affair, must manage this solemn appeal to Providence, and see that the lot was drawn fairly and without fraud, and that every tribe did acquiesce in it. The lot indeed causeth contention to cease, Pro 18:18. But, if upon this lot any controversy should arise, Joshua by his wisdom and authority must determine it, and prevent any ill consequences of it. Joshua must have the honour of dividing the land,

(1.)Because he had undergone the fatigue of conquering it: and when, through his hand, each tribe received its allotment, they would thereby be made the more sensible of their obligations to him. And what a pleasure must it needs be to a man of such a public spirit as Joshua was to see the people that were so dear to him eating of the labour of his hands!

(2.)That he might be herein a type of Christ, who has not only conquered for us the gates of hell, but has opened to us the gates of heaven, and, having purchased the eternal inheritance for all believers, will in due time put them all in possession of it.

II.An account is here given of the distribution of the land on the other side Jordan among the Reubenites, and Gadites, and half the tribe of Manasseh. Observe,

1.How this account is introduced. It comes in,

(1.)As the reason why this land within Jordan must be divided only to the nine tribes and a half, because the other two and a half were already provided for.

(2.)As a pattern to Joshua in the work he had now to do. He had seen Moses distribute that land, which would give him some aid in distributing this, and thence he might take his measure; only this was to be done by lot, but it should seem Moses did that himself, according to the wisdom given unto him.

(3.)As an inducement to Joshua to hasten the dividing of this land, that the nine tribes and a half might not be kept any longer than was necessary out of their possession, since their brethren of the two tribes and a half were so well settled in theirs; and God their common Father would not have such a difference made between his children.

2.The particulars of this account.

(1.)Here is a general description of the country that was given to the two tribes and a half, which Moses gave them, even as Moses gave them, Jos 13:8. The repetition implies a ratification of the grant by Joshua. Moses settled this matter, and, as Moses settled it, so shall it rest; Joshua will not, under any pretence whatsoever, go about to alter it. And a reason is intimated why he would not, because Moses was the servant of the Lord, and acted in this matter by secret direction from him and was faithful as a servant. Here we have,

[1.]The fixing of the boundaries of this country, by which they were divided from the neighbouring nations, Jos 13:9, etc. Israel must know their own and keep to it, and may not, under pretence of their being God's peculiar people, encroach upon their neighbours, and invade their rights and properties, to which they had a good and firm title by providence, though not, as Israel, a title by promise.

[2.]An exception of one part of this country from Israel's possession, though it was in their grant, namely, the Geshurites and the Maachathites, Jos 13:13. They had not leisure to reduce all the remote and obscure corners of the country in Moses's time, and afterwards they had no mind to it, being easy with what they had. Thus those who are not straitened in God's promises are yet straitened in their own faith, and prayers, and endeavours.

(2.)A very particular account of the inheritances of these two tribes and a half, how they were separated from each other, and what cites, with the towns, villages, and fields, commonly known and reputed to be appurtenances to them, belonged to each tribe. This is very fully and exactly set down in order that posterity might, in reading this history, be the more affected with the goodness of God to their ancestors, when they found what a large and fruitful country, and what abundance of great and famous cities, he put them in possession of (God's grants look best when we descend to the particulars); and also that the limits of every tribe being punctually set down in this authentic record disputes might be prevented, and such contests between the tribes as commonly happen where boundaries have not been adjusted nor this matter brought to a certainty. And we have reason to think that the register here prescribed and published of the lot of each tribe was of great use to Israel in after-ages, was often appealed to, and always acquiesced in, for the determining of meum and tuum - mine and thine.

[1.]We have here the lot of the tribe of Reuben, Jacob's first-born, who, though he had lost the dignity and power which pertained to the birthright, yet, it seems, had the advantage of being first served. Perhaps those of that tribe had an eye to this in desiring to be seated on that side Jordan, that, since they could not expect the benefit of the best lot, they might have the credit of the first. Observe, First, In the account of the lot of this tribe mention is made of the slaughter, 1. Of Sihon, king of the Amorites, who reigned in this country, and might have kept it and his life if he would have been neighbourly, and have suffered Israel to pass through his territories, but, by attempting to oppose them, justly brought ruin upon himself, Num 21:21, etc. 2. Of the princes of Midian, who were slain afterwards in another war (Num 31:8), and yet are here called dukes of Sihon, and are said to be smitten with him, because they were either tributaries to him, or, in his opposition to Israel, confederates with him, and hearty in his interests, and his fall made way for theirs not long after. 3. Of Balaam particularly, that would, if he could, have cursed Israel, and was soon after recompensed according to the wickedness of his endeavour (Psa 28:4), for he fell with those that set him on. This was recorded before (Num 31:8), and is here repeated, because the defeating of Balaam's purpose to curse Israel was the turning of that curse into a blessing, and was such an instance of the power and goodness of God as was fit to be had in everlasting remembrance. See Mic 6:5. Secondly, Within the lot of this tribe was that Mount Pisgah from the top of which Moses took his view of the earthly Canaan and his flight to the heavenly. And not far off thence Elijah was when he was fetched up to heaven in a chariot of fire. The separation of this tribe from the rest, by the river Jordan, was that which Deborah lamented; and the preference they gave to their private interests above the public was what she censured, Jdg 5:15, Jdg 5:16. In this tribe lay Heshbon and Sibmah, famed for their fruitful fields and vineyards. See Isa 16:8, Isa 16:9; Jer 48:32. This tribe, with that of Gad, was sorely shaken by Hazael king of Syria (Kg2 10:33), and afterwards dislodged and carried into captivity, twenty years before the general captivity of the ten tribes by the king of Assyria, Ch1 5:26.

[2.]The lot of the tribe of Gad, Jos 13:24-28. This lay north of Reuben's lot; the country of Gilead lay in this tribe, so famous for its balm that it is thought strange indeed if there be no balm in Gilead, and the cities of Jabesh-Gilead and Ramoth-Gilead which we often read of in scripture. Succoth and Penuel, which we read of in the story of Gideon, were in this tribe; and that forest which is called the wood of Ephraim (from the slaughter Jephthah made there of the Ephraimites), in which Absalom's rebellious army was beaten, while his father David lay at Mahanaim, one of the frontier-cities of this tribe, Jos 13:26. Sharon, famous for roses, was in this tribe. And within the limits of this tribe lived those Gadarenes that loved their swine better than their Saviour, fitter to be called Girgashites than Israelites.

[3.]The lot of the half-tribe of Manasseh, Jos 13:29-31. Bashan, the kingdom of Og, was in this allotment, famous for the best timber, witness the oaks of Bashan - and the best breed of cattle, witness the bulls and rams of Bashan. This tribe lay north of Gad, reached to Mount Hermon, and had in it part of Gilead. Mispeh was in this half-tribe, and Jephthah was one of its ornaments; so was Elijah, for in this tribe was Thisbe, whence he is called the Tishbite; and Jair was another. In the edge of the tribe stood Chorazin, honoured with Christ's wondrous works, but ruined by his righteous woe for not improving them.

[4.]Twice in this chapter it is taken notice of that to the tribe of Levi Moses gave no inheritance (Jos 13:14, Jos 13:33), for so God had appointed, Num 18:20. If they had been appointed to a lot entire by themselves, Moses would have served them first, not because it was his own tribe, but because it was God's; but they must be provided for in another manner; their habitations must be scattered in all the tribes, and their maintenance brought out of all the tribes, and God himself was the portion both of their inheritance and of their cup, Deu 10:9; Deu 18:2.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Historical Reception

One surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.

1 quote · AD 253
Neither Moses nor Jesus [Joshua], however, gave an inheritance to the Levites, because “the Lord God himself is their inheritance.” What else can we understand by this, except that in the church of the Lord there are certain persons who precede all the rest by the strength of their spirit and on account of their merits? The Lord himself is said to be their inheritance. And if it is proper to venture into such things and unveil a profound secret, let us see what the figure of priests or Levites secretly discloses, in case there is something. For among every people—I speak of those who are saved—the great majority are no doubt those who please the Lord through good works, honest ways and acceptable deeds because they simply believe in and fear God. But there are a few persons, exceedingly rare, who give attention to wisdom and to knowledge, keep their mind clean and pure, and cultivate noble virtues for their souls. Through the influence of teaching, they can then illuminate the way for the other more simple ones to walk to and arrive at salvation. These persons are probably designated here under the name of Levites and priests, whose heritage is said to be the Lord himself, who is wisdom, which they dearly loved above all other things.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Joshua 13:14 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8