TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Commentary on Judges 1 verses 21–36
We are here told upon what terms the rest of the tribes stood with the Canaanites that remained.
I. Benjamin neglected to drive the Jebusites out of that part of the city of Jerusalem which fell to their lot, Jdg 1:21. Judah had set them a good example, and gained them great advantages by what they did (Jdg 1:9), but they did not follow the blow for want of resolution.
II. The house of Joseph,
1.Bestirred themselves a little to get possession of Beth-el, Jdg 1:22. That city is mentioned in the tribe of Benjamin, Jos 18:22. Yet it is spoken of there (Jdg 1:13) as a city in the borders of that tribe, and, it should seem, the line went through it, so that one half of it only belonged to Benjamin, the other half to Ephraim; and perhaps the activity of the Ephraimites at this time, to recover it from the Canaanites, secured it entirely to them henceforward, or at least the greatest part of it, for afterwards we find it so much under the power of the ten tribes (and Benjamin was none of them) that Jeroboam set up one of his calves in it. In this account of the expedition of the Ephraimites against Beth-el observe,
(1.)Their interest in the divine favour: The Lord was with them, and would have been with the other tribes if they would have exerted their strength. The Chaldee reads it here, as in many other places, The Word of the Lord was their helper, namely, Christ himself, the captain of the Lord's host, now that they acted separately, as well as when they were all in one body.
(2.)The prudent measures they took to gain the city. They sent spies to observe what part of the city was weakest, or which way they might make their attack with most advantage, Jdg 1:23. These spies got very good information from a man they providentially met with, who showed them a private way into the town, which was left unguarded because, being not generally known, no danger was suspected on that side. And here, [1.] He is not to be blamed for giving them this intelligence if he did it from a conviction that the Lord was with them, and that by his donation the land was theirs of right, any more than Rahab was for entertaining those whom she knew to be enemies of her country, but friends of God. Nor, [2.] Are those to be blamed who showed him mercy, gave him and his family not only their lives, but liberty to go wherever they pleased: for one good turn requires another. But, it seems, he would not join himself to the people of Israel, he feared them rather than loved them, and therefore he removed after a colony of the Hittites, which, it should seem, had gone into Arabia and settled there upon Joshua's invasion of the country; with them this man chose to dwell, and among them he built a city, a small one, we may suppose, such as planters commonly build, and in the name of it preserved the ancient name of his native city, Luz, an almond-tree, preferring this before its new name, which carried religion in it, Bethel - the house of God.
(3.)Their success. The spies brought or sent notice of the intelligence they had gained to the army, which improved their advantages, surprised the city, and put them all to the sword, v. 25. But,
2.Besides this achievement, it seems, the children of Joseph did nothing remarkable (1.) Manasseh failed to drive out the Canaanites from several very considerable cities in their lot, and did not make any attempt upon them, Jdg 1:27. But the Canaanites, being in possession, were resolved not to quit it; they would dwell in that land, and Manasseh had not resolution enough to offer to dispossess them; as if there was no meddling with them unless they were willing to resign, which it was not to be expected they ever would be. Only as Israel got strength they got ground, and served themselves, both by their contributions and by their personal services, Jdg 1:28, Jdg 1:35. (2.) Ephraim likewise, though a powerful tribe, neglected Gezer a considerable city, and suffered the Canaanites to dwell among them (Jdg 1:29), which, some think, intimates their allowing them a quiet settlement, and indulging them with the privileges of an unconquered people, not so much as making them tributaries.
III. Zebulun, perhaps inclining to the sea-trade, for it was foretold that it should be a haven for ships, neglected to reduce Kitron and Nahalol (Jdg 1:30), and only made the inhabitants of those places tributaries to them.
IV. Asher quitted itself worse than any of the tribes (Jdg 1:31, Jdg 1:32), not only in leaving more towns than any of them in the hands of the Canaanites, but in submitting to the Canaanites instead of making them tributaries; for so the manner of expression intimates, that the Asherites dwelt among the Canaanites, as if the Canaanites were the more numerous and the more powerful, would still be lords of the country, and the Israelites must be only upon sufferance among them.
V. Naphtali also permitted the Canaanites to live among them (Jdg 1:33), only by degrees they got them so far under as to exact contributions from them.
VI. Dan was so far from extending his conquests where his lot lay that, wanting spirit to make head against the Amorites, he was forced by them to retire into the mountains and inhabit the cities there, but durst not venture into the valley, where, it is probable, the chariots of iron were, Jdg 1:34. Nay, and some of the cities in the mountains were kept against them, Jdg 1:35. Thus were they straitened in their possessions, and forced to seek for more room at Laish, a great way off, Jdg 18:1, etc. In Jacob's blessing Judah is compared to a lion, Dan to a serpent; now observe how Judah with his lion-like courage prospered and prevailed, but Dan with all his serpenting subtlety could get no ground; craft and artful management do not always effect the wonders they pretend to. What Dan came short of doing, it seems, his neighbours the Ephraimites in part did for him; they put the Amorites under tribute, Jdg 1:35.
Upon the whole matter it appears that the people of Israel were generally very careless both of their duty and interest in this thing; they did not what they might have done to expel the Canaanites and make room for themselves. And, 1. It was owing to their slothfulness and cowardice. They would not be at the pains to complete their conquests; like the sluggard, that dreamed of a lion in the way, a lion in the streets, they fancied insuperable difficulties, and frightened themselves with winds and clouds from sowing and reaping. 2. It was owing to their covetousness; the Canaanites' labour and money would do them more good (they thought) than their blood, and therefore they were willing to let them live among them, that they might make a hand of them. 3. They had not that dread and detestation of idolatry which they ought to have had; they thought it a pity to put these Canaanites to the sword, though the measure of their iniquity was full, thought it would be no harm to let them live among them, and that they should be in no danger from them. 4. The same thing that kept their fathers forty years out of Canaan kept them now out of the full possession of it, and that was unbelief. Distrust of the power and promise of God lost them their advantages, and ran them into a thousand mischiefs.
Continue studying Judges 1:27 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Judges 1:27 meticulously records the failure of the tribe of Manasseh to fully dispossess the indigenous Canaanite inhabitants from several strategically vital cities within their divinely allotted territory, specifically Bethshean, Taanach, Dor, Ibleam, and Megiddo. This particular instance of incomplete obedience serves as a stark illustration of a pervasive theme throughout Judges 1, highlighting Israel's widespread reluctance or inability to complete the conquest as explicitly commanded by God. This critical lapse in covenant fidelity inevitably set the stage for the profound spiritual and moral compromises, cycles of apostasy, and subsequent oppression that would tragically define the entire period of the Judges.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: Judges 1 functions as an indispensable bridge between the triumphant, unified conquest narratives under Joshua and the fragmented, often disobedient, and morally declining era that characterizes the rest of the book. While the book of Joshua concludes with the land apportioned and a call to unwavering faithfulness, Judges 1 immediately confronts the reader with the stark reality of Israel's widespread failure to fully occupy their inheritance. The chapter systematically details the incomplete conquests of various tribes, frequently employing the recurring, somber refrain "did not drive out" or "could not drive out." This pattern establishes a tone of missed opportunity, partial obedience, and profound disobedience. Verse 27 specifically highlights Manasseh's particular lapse, mirroring the broader pattern of compromise that, as the book unfolds, directly leads to the tragic cycles of apostasy, divine judgment, foreign oppression, and subsequent deliverance by judges. This foundational chapter thus provides the crucial theological explanation for why the tumultuous period of the Judges was necessary, revealing that the seeds of future spiritual and national decline were sown in these initial acts of unfaithfulness.
Historical & Cultural Context: The period immediately following the death of Joshua, roughly spanning the 14th to 13th centuries BCE, saw the Israelite tribes attempting to consolidate their hold on the Promised Land. The cities enumerated in Judges 1:27—Bethshean, Taanach, Dor, Ibleam, and Megiddo—were not minor settlements but highly strategic strongholds. They were predominantly located in the fertile Jezreel Valley (also known as the Plain of Esdraelon) and along the vital coastal plain, controlling crucial trade routes and rich agricultural lands. These Canaanite cities were typically well-fortified and often possessed superior military technology, notably iron chariots, which presented a formidable challenge to the Israelite forces, as explicitly noted in Judges 1:19. Furthermore, Canaanite culture was characterized by pervasive polytheism, abhorrent idolatry (including the worship of Baal and Asherah), cultic prostitution, and the horrific practice of child sacrifice. God's repeated and emphatic command to completely drive out these inhabitants (e.g., Deuteronomy 7:1-5) was not an arbitrary act of cruelty but a divine imperative designed to protect Israel's spiritual purity and covenant fidelity from the profoundly corrupting influence of pagan practices.
Key Themes: Judges 1:27 powerfully encapsulates several pivotal themes central to the book of Judges and the overarching biblical narrative. Foremost among these is the critical distinction between partial obedience and complete obedience. God's command to dispossess all the inhabitants was unequivocal. Manasseh's failure, consistent with that of other tribes, reveals a profound lack of wholehearted commitment to God's explicit instructions, leading directly to the consequences of compromise. The concluding phrase, "but the Canaanites would dwell in that land," is far more than a mere statement of fact; it is a profound harbinger of the spiritual and moral decline that inevitably follows. The continued presence of the Canaanites served as a persistent temptation to idolatry, intermarriage, and syncretism, ultimately becoming a "snare" and "thorn in your sides," precisely as prophesied by the Angel of the Lord in Judges 2:3. This verse also subtly underscores a pervasive lack of faith and resolve among the Israelites. Despite God's unwavering promise of victory and His demonstrated power in the initial conquest, they seemingly lacked the courage or conviction to fully trust Him for the complete dispossessing, perhaps preferring the perceived ease of coexistence or fearing the military might of their adversaries. This sets the stage for the recurring pattern of Israel's spiritual decline and their desperate cries for divine deliverance throughout the subsequent narratives of the book.
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
Judges 1:27 masterfully employs several potent literary devices to convey its critical message. The most prominent is Repetition, specifically the repeated negative construction "Neither did... nor..." followed by a precise Catalogue or Litany of un-conquered cities. This sustained repetition emphasizes the widespread, systematic, and pervasive nature of Manasseh's failure, underscoring that this was not an isolated incident but a deeply ingrained pattern of disobedience. The cumulative effect of this enumeration creates a profound sense of disappointment and highlights the grave implications of their unfaithfulness. There is also a strong element of Juxtaposition: the implied divine command for complete conquest and purification of the land is starkly contrasted with the actual, tragic outcome of Israel's partial obedience and compromise. Finally, the concluding phrase, "but the Canaanites would dwell in that land," functions as powerful Foreshadowing. It subtly yet definitively predicts the future troubles and the cyclical nature of apostasy and oppression that will define the entire period of the Judges, where these remaining inhabitants indeed become a persistent source of spiritual corruption and military subjugation for Israel, as explicitly stated and elaborated upon in Judges 2:3.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Judges 1:27 is a pivotal verse that connects directly to the foundational covenant relationship between God and Israel, established through Abraham's call and solemnly ratified at Mount Sinai. God had unequivocally promised the land to Israel as an inheritance and commanded them to completely dispossess its inhabitants to preserve their unique identity as His holy nation, distinct and set apart from the corrupting influences of paganism. This verse reveals Israel's profound failure to fully embrace their divine calling, demonstrating a critical lapse in both faith and obedience. Their partial conquest was not merely a military setback but a profound spiritual compromise that allowed the very influences God sought to protect them from to remain deeply embedded within their borders. This failure directly contravened explicit divine commands given through Moses (e.g., Deuteronomy 7:2) and solemn warnings issued by Joshua (e.g., Joshua 23:13). The immediate and devastating consequences of this compromise are vividly evident in the subsequent narrative of Judges, where the remaining Canaanites become a "snare" and "thorn" to Israel, leading to recurring cycles of idolatry, oppression, and divine judgment, as clearly articulated in Judges 2:3.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
Judges 1:27 serves as a timeless and profound warning against the insidious dangers of partial obedience and spiritual compromise. Just as Manasseh's failure to fully dispossess the Canaanites led to long-term spiritual degradation and national struggles for Israel, so too can our own unwillingness to fully surrender areas of our lives to God's complete authority invite ongoing spiritual battles, hinder our growth in holiness, and diminish our effectiveness for His kingdom. This passage compels us to engage in honest and thorough self-examination, prompting us to identify the "Canaanites" in our own spiritual "territory"—stubborn sins, ungodly habits, worldly influences, unyielded ambitions, or areas of our heart—that we have knowingly or unknowingly allowed to remain. While the physical conquest of nations is no longer our calling, the spiritual battle against sin, the flesh, and the desires of the world remains intensely real (Ephesians 6:12). We are called to wholehearted devotion, trusting God for complete victory over every stronghold that seeks to undermine our walk with Him. This requires not just an initial act of faith, but sustained resolve, vigilant obedience, and unwavering reliance on divine power, recognizing that compromise, however seemingly small or insignificant, can have far-reaching and detrimental consequences for our spiritual purity, peace, and effectiveness in fulfilling God's purposes.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was it so important for Israel to drive out the Canaanites completely?
Answer: God's command to completely drive out the Canaanites was fundamentally rooted in His absolute holiness and His fervent desire to protect Israel's covenant purity and unique identity as His chosen people. Canaanite culture was deeply entrenched in abhorrent idolatry, pervasive polytheism, the horrific practice of child sacrifice, and various forms of sexual immorality, all of which were a profound abomination to Yahweh. Allowing these inhabitants to remain would inevitably lead to Israel adopting their pagan practices, corrupting their worship of the one true God, and ultimately breaking their sacred covenant with Him. This was explicitly and repeatedly warned against in passages such as Deuteronomy 7:1-6 and Exodus 34:15-16. The continued presence of the Canaanites was designed by God to be a constant temptation and a spiritual snare, leading Israel away from monotheistic worship and into cycles of sin, idolatry, and divine judgment, as tragically seen throughout the book of Judges.
What was the significance of the specific cities mentioned in Judges 1:27 (Bethshean, Taanach, Dor, Ibleam, Megiddo)?
Answer: The cities listed in Judges 1:27 were not random settlements but highly strategic and economically vital locations that controlled crucial regions within Israel's allotted territory. Bethshean, Taanach, Ibleam, and Megiddo were all situated in or near the fertile Jezreel Valley (also known as the Plain of Esdraelon), which was a critical agricultural area and a major international trade route connecting Egypt to Mesopotamia. Control of this valley was essential for economic prosperity, agricultural output, and military dominance. These cities were also renowned for being well-fortified and often possessed advanced military technology, such as formidable iron chariots, which posed a significant challenge to the Israelite forces, as explicitly noted in Judges 1:19. Dor was an important coastal city, further highlighting the strategic and economic value of the un-conquered areas. Manasseh's failure to dispossess these strongholds meant that key arteries of communication, trade, and military control remained in enemy hands, fragmenting Israel's territory and leaving them perpetually vulnerable to ongoing pagan influence, cultural assimilation, and future military oppression.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The tragic narrative of Israel's partial conquest, powerfully exemplified by Manasseh's failure in Judges 1:27, profoundly foreshadows the absolute necessity for a perfect, complete, and decisive deliverer—Jesus Christ. Where Israel, the earthly people of God, failed to fully dispossess their physical enemies and purify the promised land, Christ, as the true Israel and the ultimate Joshua, achieves a complete and utterly decisive spiritual conquest. He does not merely "drive out" some enemies or partially subdue a few strongholds; He utterly defeats the powers of darkness, sin, and death itself. Through His atoning sacrifice on the cross and His glorious resurrection, Jesus disarms all principalities and powers, triumphing over them publicly (Colossians 2:15). He is the one who, unlike Manasseh, fully takes possession of the spiritual inheritance for His people, liberating them from the dominion of sin and the power of Satan (Hebrews 2:14-15). Where Israel's partial obedience led to cycles of compromise, spiritual decay, and recurring oppression, Christ's perfect obedience and complete victory enable all believers to live as "more than conquerors" through Him who loved them (Romans 8:37), inheriting true spiritual freedom and the promise of eternal life in a kingdom where all enemies have been fully and eternally dispossessed.