TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Samuel 15:1–9. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Here, I. Samuel, in God's name, solemnly requires Saul to be obedient to the command of God, and plainly intimates that he was now about to put him upon a trial, in one particular instance, whether he would be obedient or no, Sa1 15:1. And the making of this so expressly the trial of his obedience did very much aggravate his disobedience. 1. He reminds him of what God had done for him: "The Lord sent me to anoint thee to be a king. God gave thee thy power, and therefore he expects thou shouldst use thy power for him. He put honour upon thee, and now thou must study how to do him honour. He made thee king over Israel, and now thou must plead Israel's cause and avenge their quarrels. Thou art advanced to command Israel, but know that thou art a subject to the God of Israel and must be commanded by him." Men's preferment, instead of releasing them from their obedience to God, obliges them so much the more to it. Samuel had himself been employed to anoint Saul, and therefore was the fitter to be send with these orders to him. 2. He tells him, in general, that, in consideration of this, whatever God commanded him to do he was bound to do it: Now therefore hearken to the voice of the Lord. Note, God's favours to us lay strong obligations upon us to be obedient to him. This we must render, Psa 116:12.
II.He appoints him a particular piece of service, in which he must now show his obedience to God more than in any thing he had done yet.
Samuel premises God's authority to the command: Thus says the Lord of hosts, the Lord of all hosts, of Israel's hosts. He also gives him a reason for the command, that the severity he must use might not seem hard: I remember that which Amalek did to Israel, Sa1 15:2. God had an ancient quarrel with the Amalekites, for the injuries they did to his people Israel when he brought them out of Egypt. We have the story, Exo 17:8, etc., and the crime is aggravated, Deu 25:18. He basely smote the hindmost of them, and feared not God. God then swore that he would have war with Amalek from generation to generation, and that in process of time he would utterly put out the remembrance of Amalek; this is the work that Saul is now appointed to do (Sa1 15:3): "Go and smite Amalek. Israel is now strong, and the measure of the iniquity of Amalek is now full; now go and make a full riddance of that devoted nation." He is expressly commanded to kill and slay all before him, man and woman, infant and suckling, and not spare them out of pity; also ox and sheep, camel and ass, and not spare them out of covetousness. Note,
1.Injuries done to God's Israel will certainly be reckoned for sooner or later, especially the opposition given them when they are coming out of Egypt.
2.God often bears long with those that are marked for ruin. The sentence passed is not executed speedily.
3.Though he bear long, he will not bear always. The year of recompence for the controversy of Israel will come at last. Though divine justice strikes slowly it strikes surely.
4.The longer judgment is delayed many times the more severe it is when it comes.
5.God chooses out instruments to do his work that are fittest for it. This was bloody work, and therefore Saul who was a rough and severe man must do it.
III.Saul hereupon musters his forces, and makes a descent upon the country of Amalek.
It was an immense army that he brought into the field (Sa1 15:4): 200,000 footmen. When he came to engage the Philistines, and the success was hazardous, he had but 600 attending him, Sa1 13:15. But now that he was to attack the Amalekites by express order from heaven, in which he was sure of victory, he had thousands at his call. But, whatever it was at other times, it was not now for the honour of Judah that their forces were numbered by themselves, for their quota was scandalously short (whatever was the reason), but a twentieth part of the whole, for they were by 10,000, when the other ten tribes (for I except Levi) brought into the field 200,000. The day of Judah's honour drew near, but had not yet come. Saul numbered them in Telaim, which signifies lambs. He numbered then like lambs (so the vulgar Latin), numbered them by the paschal lambs (so the Chaldee), allowing ten to a lamb, a way of numbering used by the Jews in the later times of their nation. Saul drew all his forces to the city of Amalek, that city that was their metropolis (Sa1 15:5), that he might provoke them to give him battle.
IV.He gave friendly advice to the Kenites to separate themselves from the Amalekites among whom they dwelt, while this execution was in doing, Sa1 15:6. Herein he did prudently and piously, and, it is probable, according to the direction Samuel gave him. The Kenites were of the family and kindred of Jethro, Moses's father-in-law, a people that dwelt in tents, which made it easy for them, upon every occasion, to remove to other lands not appropriated. Many of them, at this time, dwelt among the Amalekites, where, though they dwelt in tents, they were fortified by nature, for they put their nest in a rock, being hardy people that could live any where, and affected fastnesses, Num 24:21. Balaam had foretold that they should be wasted, Num 24:22. However, Saul must not waste them. But,
1.He acknowledges the kindness of their ancestors to Israel, when they came out of Egypt. Jethro and his family had been very helpful and serviceable to them in their passage through the wilderness, had been to them instead of eyes, and this is remembered to their posterity many ages after. Thus a good man leaves the divine blessing for an inheritance to his children's children; those that come after us may be reaping the benefit of our good works when we are in our graves. God is not unrighteous to forget the kindnesses shown to his people; but they shall be remembered another day, at furthest in the great day, and recompensed in the resurrection of the just. I was hungry, and you gave me meat. God's remembering the kindness of the Kenites' ancestors in favour to them, at the same time when he was punishing the injuries done by the ancestors of the Amalekites, helped to clear the righteousness of God in that dispensation. If he entail favours, why may he not entail frowns? He espouses his people's cause, so as to bless those that bless them; and therefore so as to curse those that curse them, Num 24:9; Gen 12:3. They cannot themselves requite the kindnesses nor avenge the injuries done them, but God will do both.
2.He desires them to remove their tents from among the Amalekites: Go, depart, get you down from among them. When destroying judgments are abroad God will take care to separate between the precious and the vile, and to hide the meek of the earth in the day of his anger. It is dangerous being found in the company of God's enemies, and it is our duty and interest to come out from among them, lest we share in their sins and plagues, Rev 18:4. The Jews have a saying, Woe to the wicked man and woe to his neighbour.
V.Saul prevailed against the Amalekites, for it was rather an execution of condemned malefactors than a war with contending enemies.
The issue could not be dubious when the cause was just and the call so clear: He smote them (Sa1 15:7), utterly destroyed them, Sa1 15:8. Now they paid dearly for the sin of their ancestors. God sometimes lays up iniquity for the children. They were idolaters, and were guilty of many other sins, for which they deserved to fall under the wrath of God; yet, when God would reckon with them, he fastened upon the sin of their ancestors in abusing his Israel as the ground of his quarrel. Lord, How unsearchable are thy judgments, yet how incontestable is thy righteousness!
VI.Yet he did his work by halves, Sa1 15:9.
1.He spared Agag, because he was a king like himself, and perhaps in hope to get a great ransom for him.
2.He spared the best of the cattle, and destroyed only the refuse, that was good for little. Many of the people, we may suppose, made their escape, and took their effects with them into other countries, and therefore we read of Amalekites after this; but that could not be helped. It was Saul's fault that he did not destroy such as came to his hands and were in his power. That which was now destroyed was in effect sacrificed to the justice of God, as the God to whom vengeance belongeth; and for Saul to think the torn and the sick, the lame and the lean, good enough for that, while he reserved for his own fields and his own table the firstlings and the fat, was really to honour himself more than God.
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
One surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.
But he who does not consider these things, will, contrary to justice, spare him who deserves punishment; as Saul spared Agag, and Eli his sons, “who knew not the Lord.” Such a one profanes his own dignity and that church of God which is in his parish. Such a one is esteemed unjust before God and holy men, as affording occasion of scandal to many of the newly baptized and to the catechumens; as also to the youth of both sexes, to whom a woe belongs, add “a millstone about his neck,” and drowning, on account of his guilt. For, observing what a person their governor is, through his wickedness and neglect of justice they will grow skeptical, and, indulging the same disease, will be compelled to perish with him; as was the case of the people joining with Jeroboam, and those which were in the conspiracy with Korah.
Continue studying 1 Samuel 15:9 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
1 Samuel 15:9 records King Saul's profound act of disobedience during his divinely mandated campaign against the Amalekites. Despite God's explicit command for a complete and utter destruction (the cherem or ban) of the enemy and all their possessions, Saul and the Israelite people deliberately chose to spare King Agag and the finest of the livestock and goods. They only destroyed what they deemed worthless or "vile and refuse," revealing a selective and self-serving obedience driven by human desire for spoil or glory rather than absolute submission to divine authority. This pivotal act of rebellion demonstrated Saul's unfitness for kingship and set the stage for his ultimate rejection by God.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is a critical turning point in the narrative of Saul's reign, serving as the direct evidence of his disobedience that leads to his rejection as king. It immediately follows God's unequivocal command, delivered through the prophet Samuel in 1 Samuel 15:2-3, which specified the complete annihilation of the Amalekites and all their possessions, "both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass." Saul's initial military success is noted in 1 Samuel 15:7-8, but this verse reveals the critical failure in executing the cherem fully. The subsequent verses, beginning with 1 Samuel 15:10, detail God's deep sorrow and decision to depose Saul, culminating in Samuel's famous declaration that "to obey is better than sacrifice" in 1 Samuel 15:22. Thus, 1 Samuel 15:9 acts as the hinge, presenting the specific nature of Saul's rebellion that precipitates his divine repudiation and paves the way for David's anointing.
Historical & Cultural Context
The command to destroy the Amalekites, known as the cherem or "ban," was rooted in their ancient and unprovoked attack on the Israelites during their exodus from Egypt, as recorded in Exodus 17:8-16. God had sworn to utterly blot out the remembrance of Amalek, a decree reiterated in Deuteronomy 25:17-19. This was not merely a tribal conflict but a divinely ordained judgment against a people who had consistently opposed God's chosen nation and His redemptive purposes. In ancient Near Eastern warfare, the cherem was a practice where spoils of war, or even entire populations, were dedicated to a deity, often through destruction, to prevent defilement or to acknowledge divine ownership. For Israel, it represented a test of their absolute loyalty to Yahweh, demonstrating that their battles were His, and their victories were not for personal gain but for His glory. Saul's failure to adhere to this sacred ban thus constituted a severe breach of covenant fidelity and a direct challenge to God's authority.
Key Themes
1 Samuel 15 is replete with profound theological themes. Foremost among them is the absolute necessity of complete obedience to God's revealed will, starkly contrasted with Saul's partial and self-serving compliance. This narrative powerfully illustrates that "partial obedience is disobedience" in God's eyes, as He demands the heart's full surrender, not merely outward conformity. Another crucial theme is the tension between the sovereignty of God and human autonomy, where Saul's decision to spare the "good" livestock and Agag demonstrates a preference for human reasoning and perceived benefit over divine wisdom and command. This chapter also vividly portrays the consequences of disobedience, showing how a single act of rebellion can have far-reaching implications, leading to God's rejection of Saul as king, a pivotal moment in Israel's history that prepared the way for David's anointing. Finally, the narrative underscores the nature of true worship, emphasizing that genuine devotion is expressed through unwavering obedience rather than through ritualistic sacrifices offered from ill-gotten gains, as famously articulated by Samuel in 1 Samuel 15:22.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This verb means "to commiserate," "to pity," or "to spare." In this context, it signifies a deliberate act of withholding destruction, directly contrary to the divine command. It implies a human choice to show mercy or preserve something for personal gain, overriding God's explicit instructions for utter destruction. Saul's act of sparing Agag and the best of the livestock was not an oversight but a conscious decision.
This primitive root means "to seclude," and specifically (by a ban) "to devote to religious uses (especially destruction)." It is the verb form of cherem, signifying a complete consecration of something to God, often through its annihilation, particularly in the context of nations under divine judgment. Saul's failure to ḥāram everything meant he did not fully dedicate the spoils and people to God as commanded, treating them instead as common plunder or personal assets.
This word means "despised" or "worthless." It describes the lowest quality or what was considered utterly without value. This term, used in stark contrast to "all that was good," highlights Saul's selective obedience, demonstrating that he and the people only fulfilled the command where it cost them nothing, destroying only what held no perceived worth to them.
Verse Breakdown
"But Saul and the people spared Agag, and the best of the sheep, and of the oxen, and of the fatlings, and the lambs, and all [that was] good, and would not utterly destroy them:"
This opening clause immediately highlights the direct violation of God's command. The inclusion of "Saul and the people" suggests a shared culpability, though Saul, as king, bears ultimate responsibility for leading this disobedience. The specific listing of "Agag" (the Amalekite king) and various categories of prime livestock ("best of the sheep," "oxen," "fatlings," "lambs") underscores the deliberate nature of their choice. They did not merely overlook a few items but intentionally preserved the most valuable assets and the enemy king, likely for a triumphant display, personal gain, or sacrificial offerings, all of which were explicitly forbidden under the cherem. The phrase "would not utterly destroy them" directly contradicts the divine mandate, revealing a conscious act of rebellion against the Lord's clear instructions.
"but every thing [that was] vile and refuse, that they destroyed utterly."
This contrasting clause further emphasizes the partial and self-serving nature of their obedience. They did indeed "utterly destroy" some things, but only what was deemed "vile and refuse"—that is, worthless, despised, or of no practical use or value (the Hebrew for "refuse," mâçaç, H4549, implies something rejected or melted away, thus worthless). This selective destruction exposes the hypocrisy of their actions. They fulfilled the letter of the law only where it cost them nothing, demonstrating a fundamental misunderstanding or disregard for the spirit of God's command, which demanded total devotion and renunciation of self-interest in the execution of His judgment.
Literary Devices
The verse employs several powerful literary devices to convey its critical message. Juxtaposition is central, starkly contrasting what Saul and the people "spared" (the best, the valuable, the king) with what they "destroyed utterly" (the vile, the refuse, the worthless). This contrast immediately highlights their selective and self-serving obedience. The detailed enumeration of the spared livestock ("sheep," "oxen," "fatlings," "lambs") emphasizes the extent of their covetousness and the deliberate nature of their transgression, leaving no ambiguity about what was preserved. The repetition of the concept of "utterly destroy" (or its negation) further underscores the divine command that was violated. Furthermore, the narrative functions as a form of foreshadowing, as this act of disobedience directly sets the stage for God's subsequent rejection of Saul as king, making this verse a pivotal turning point in the unfolding drama of the early monarchy.
Theological and Thematic Connections
This verse serves as a profound theological statement on the nature of obedience and the unwavering character of God. It underscores that God demands complete and unreserved obedience, not partial compliance based on human discretion, perceived benefit, or self-interest. Saul's failure reveals a fundamental flaw in his understanding of kingship: he saw himself as autonomous, able to modify divine commands, rather than as a steward fully subject to God's absolute authority. This act of disobedience is not merely a minor transgression but a deep-seated rebellion, prioritizing personal gain and human glory over the divine will. It teaches us that true faith is demonstrated not by what we offer to God from our own choosing, but by our willingness to surrender entirely to His specific instructions, even when they seem counter-intuitive or costly. God's holiness and His right to absolute sovereignty are paramount, and any compromise with His command is seen as an affront to His character and an act of spiritual rebellion.
Reflection and Application
The account of Saul's disobedience in 1 Samuel 15:9 offers timeless and challenging lessons for believers today. It forces us to confront the subtle dangers of partial obedience, where we may fulfill some of God's commands while selectively ignoring others that are inconvenient, costly, or simply do not align with our personal desires or perceived wisdom. Like Saul, we can rationalize our actions, perhaps believing we have a "better" way or that our motives (like offering sacrifices from the spoils) justify our deviation from God's clear instructions. This verse calls us to a radical self-examination, prompting us to ask where we might be holding back from God, sparing aspects of our lives, our resources, or our ambitions that He has called us to "utterly destroy" or surrender. It reminds us that God desires our whole heart and our complete submission, not just our outward religious performance or a portion of our lives. True spiritual maturity is marked by a willingness to obey God fully, even when it means sacrificing our own preferences, comfort, or perceived advantage, trusting that His ways are always higher and ultimately for our good and His glory.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was God's command to "utterly destroy" so absolute and seemingly harsh?
God's command to "utterly destroy" (the cherem) was a specific divine judgment against the Amalekites, rooted in their historical and persistent wickedness. They were the first nation to attack Israel after their exodus from Egypt, striking the weak and weary at the rear (Exodus 17:8-16). This act was seen as an assault on God Himself and His redemptive plan for His people. Furthermore, Amalek later became a symbol of persistent opposition to God's people throughout Israel's history. The cherem was not a general command for all warfare but a unique, divinely ordained act of judgment, similar to the destruction of Jericho (Joshua 6:17-21). It served to demonstrate God's absolute sovereignty, His righteous judgment against sin, and to prevent Israel from being corrupted by the pagan practices and idolatry of the condemned nations. It was a test of Israel's complete devotion to Yahweh, ensuring they understood that the victory and the spoils belonged to Him alone.
Did Saul's actions truly warrant such a severe consequence as losing his kingship?
Yes, in the context of biblical kingship and covenant, Saul's disobedience was profoundly serious. His failure to "utterly destroy" the Amalekites and their possessions was not a minor oversight but a direct act of rebellion against God's explicit command. As the first king of Israel, Saul was meant to represent God's authority and lead the people in complete obedience. His actions demonstrated a lack of trust in God's wisdom, a preference for his own will or the people's desires over God's, and a fundamental misunderstanding of his role as God's anointed. Samuel explicitly states in 1 Samuel 15:23 that "rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry." This indicates that Saul's disobedience was not just a mistake but a profound spiritual rebellion, akin to idolatry, which directly challenged God's supreme authority. Such a challenge from the king was intolerable for the theocratic nation of Israel and necessitated his rejection.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
While 1 Samuel 15:9 highlights Saul's profound failure in obedience, it ultimately points forward to the perfect obedience of Jesus Christ, the true King of Israel. Saul's selective destruction and preservation of the "good" revealed his self-interest and compromised kingship, but Christ perfectly executed the Father's will, even to the point of death on the cross. Where Saul failed to utterly destroy the enemies of God and their corrupting influence, Jesus, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, utterly destroyed the power of sin and death through His sacrifice, fulfilling the ultimate cherem against the spiritual enemies of humanity (Hebrews 2:14-15). Saul's desire for human glory and spoil contrasts sharply with Christ's self-emptying humility and obedience, even to the point of death on a cross (Philippians 2:5-8). Moreover, the judgment executed upon Amalek foreshadows the final, complete judgment that Christ will bring upon all unrighteousness at His second coming (Revelation 19:11-16). Unlike Saul, who was rejected for his disobedience, Jesus is the perfectly obedient Son, whose submission to the Father's will, even in suffering, secured our salvation and established His eternal kingdom, where He reigns supreme, having perfectly accomplished all that the Father commanded (John 6:38). He is the King who truly "utterly destroys" all that is vile and refuse in the spiritual realm, making all things new.