Skip to content

1 Samuel 15:19

“Obedience Is Better Than Sacrifice”1 Samuel 15:17–23

King James Version
Wherefore then didst thou not obey the voice of the LORD, but didst fly upon the spoil, and didst evil in the sight of the LORD?

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
Wherefore then didst thou not obey H8085 the voice H6963 of the LORD H3068, but didst fly H5860 upon the spoil H7998, and didst H6213 evil H7451 in the sight H5869 of the LORD H3068?

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
So why did you not obey the LORD? Why did you rush upon the plunder and do evil in the sight of the LORD?”

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
Wherefore then didst thou not obey the voice of Jehovah, but didst fly upon the spoil, and didst that which was evil in the sight of Jehovah?

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
Why then didn’t you obey the voice of the LORD, but took the plunder, and did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD?”

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
Nowe wherefore hast thou not obeyed the voyce of the Lord, but hast turned to the pray, and hast done wickedly in the sight of the Lord?

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
and why hast thou not hearkened to the voice of Jehovah--and dost fly unto the spoil, and dost do the evil thing in the eyes of Jehovah?'

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
12 Hebrew words
  1. וְלָמָּהve·La·mahand [to] why?H4100Conj-w ¦ Prep-l ¦ InterrogPronoun Interrogativeוְandלָ[to]מָּהwhy?
  2. לֹאlo'notH3808NegParticle Negative
  3. שָׁמַעְתָּsha·Ma'·tadid you listenH8085V-Qal-Perf-2msVerb Qal Perfect 2nd Singular Masculine
  4. בְּקוֹלbe·Kolto [the] voice ofH6963Prep-b ¦ N-mscNoun Singular Masculine Constructבְּtoקוֹל[the] voice of
  5. יְהוָהYah·wehYahwehH3068N-properNoun Proper Title
  6. וַתַּעַטva·Ta·'atand did you rush?H5860Conj-w ¦ V-Qal-ConsecImperf-2msVerb Qal Consecutive Imperfect 2nd Singular Masculineוַandתַּעַטdid you rush?
  7. אֶל'eltoH413PrepPreposition
  8. הַשָּׁלָלha·sha·Lalthe plunderH7998Art ¦ N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absoluteהַtheשָּׁלָלplunder
  9. וַתַּעַשׂva·Ta·'asand did you do?H6213Conj-w ¦ V-Qal-ConsecImperf-2msVerb Qal Consecutive Imperfect 2nd Singular Masculineוַandתַּעַשׂdid you do?
  10. הָרַעha·Ra'the evilH7451Art ¦ Adj-msAdjective Singular Masculine Absoluteהָtheרַעevil
  11. בְּעֵינֵיbe·'ei·Neiin [the] eyes ofH5869Prep-b ¦ N-fdcNoun Dual Feminine Constructבְּinעֵינֵי[the] eyes of
  12. יְהוָהYah·wehYahwehH3068N-properNoun Proper Title
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
In the KJVVerse 7,580 of 31,102 · 24.4%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

Samuel asks why Saul disobeyed the LORD’s voice and swooped on the plunder like a bird of prey, doing what the LORD saw as evil.

“Wherefore then didst thou not obey the voice of the LORD,”

shâmaʻ, to hear and heed. Saul had heard the command plainly, and the question shows he had no reason to give.

“but didst fly upon the spoil,”

ʻîyṭ, to swoop like a bird of prey, on shâlâl, the goods of war that lay under the ban.

“and didst evil in the sight of the LORD?”

raʻ in the LORD’s ʻayin, evil in his eye, whatever name Saul gave it.

Passage study1 Samuel 15:17–23

Obedience Is Better Than Sacrifice

17And Samuel said, When thou wast little in thine own sight, wast thou not made the head of the tribes of Israel, and the LORD anointed thee king over Israel? 18And the LORD sent thee on a journey, and said, Go and utterly destroy the sinners the Amalekites, and fight against them until they be consumed. 19Wherefore then didst thou not obey the voice of the LORD, but didst fly upon the spoil, and didst evil in the sight of the LORD? 20And Saul said unto Samuel, Yea, I have obeyed the voice of the LORD, and have gone the way which the LORD sent me, and have brought Agag the king of Amalek, and have utterly destroyed the Amalekites. 21But the people took of the spoil, sheep and oxen, the chief of the things which should have been utterly destroyed, to sacrifice unto the LORD thy God in Gilgal. 22And Samuel said, Hath the LORD as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams. 23For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry. Because thou hast rejected the word of the LORD, he hath also rejected thee from being king.

Summary

Saul has come back from war with Amalek with King Agag alive and the best of the flocks and herds, though the LORD sent him to destroy them all. Samuel meets him with a reminder and a question. The LORD made Saul head of Israel’s tribes and anointed him king when he was little in his own eyes, so why did he swoop on the spoil and do evil in the LORD’s sight? Saul insists that he obeyed, and he lays the spared animals on the people, who kept them to sacrifice at Gilgal. Samuel answers with the words this passage is known for: “to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.” Rebellion stands beside witchcraft and stubbornness beside idolatry, and because Saul rejected the word of the LORD, the LORD rejected him from being king. Here we learn that God delights in people who hear his voice and do what it says, that he sees through every religious cover we put over disobedience, and that the God who lifts up the humble also holds those he lifts up to account.

What Saul was sent to do, and what he did

The chapter opens with the LORD’s command, given through Samuel, that Saul should attack Amalek and utterly destroy it, people and livestock alike (1 Samuel 15:1–3). Saul won the battle, but he and the people spared Agag and the best of the sheep and oxen and all that was good (1 Samuel 15:8–9). The LORD told Samuel that he regretted making Saul king (1 Samuel 15:10–11). When Samuel arrived, Saul’s first excuse was that the people had spared the best animals to sacrifice to the LORD (1 Samuel 15:15). These seven verses are the rest of that meeting, the point in 1 Samuel 15 where Saul’s reign is decided.

Who the Amalekites were

Amalek was a descendant of Esau (Genesis 36:12), and his people lived as nomads. Shortly after the Exodus they attacked Israel at Rephidim without provocation, and there God swore that he would wipe out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven (Exodus 17:8–16). Moses later told Israel to remember how Amalek struck the weak and weary at the rear of the march, and to blot out its memory once the LORD had given them rest (Deuteronomy 25:17–19). Saul’s campaign was the carrying out of a judgment God had declared long before, against a people whose hostility to Israel had run on ever since.

Why was the command against Amalek so severe?

The command was God’s particular judgment on one people, for a wickedness that had gone on unrepented from the wilderness to Saul’s day. A thing put under this ban, chêrem, was given over wholly to the LORD, usually by being destroyed, so that people, animals and goods all went to him and the whole of it was kept out of the soldiers’ hands. The ban kept Israel from profiting by a nation God had condemned and from being drawn into its ways, and it showed that both the victory and the judgment were the LORD’s. The law gave the same rule of devoted things for a city in Israel that turned to other gods (Deuteronomy 13:17). This was a specific judgment on a specific enemy of God’s purposes, carried out as an act of holy justice.

For Saul, Israel’s first king, the command was also a test. The armies of the nations took spoil as a matter of course and as the sign of their victory. The LORD asked Saul to take none of it, and so to show that he ruled under the LORD as Israel’s true King.

Little in thine own sight

Samuel begins with a reminder in the form of a question: “When thou wast little in thine own sight, wast thou not made the head of the tribes of Israel, and the LORD anointed thee king over Israel?” The word for little, qâṭân, means small, young or insignificant, always measured against something else. Here it is Saul’s own measure of himself. When Samuel first spoke to him of the kingdom, Saul protested that he was a Benjamite, of the smallest tribe of Israel, and that his family was the least in Benjamin (1 Samuel 9:21).

The question expects the answer yes, and it names who raised him. The LORD, Yᵉhôvâh, the covenant name of Israel’s God, took Saul from obscurity and set him over the whole nation. To anoint, mâshach, is to smear or rub with oil, and in its consecrating use it set a person apart for an office. In Israel prophets, priests and kings were anointed, and Samuel had anointed Saul with oil at the start of his reign (1 Samuel 10:1). The kingdom was the LORD’s gift, so Saul answered to the LORD for it. Israel’s king was meant to be the LORD’s servant, bound by the covenant and subject to the word of the prophet, as the law for kings had already laid down (Deuteronomy 17:14–20).

Samuel’s reminder goes to the root of the trouble. The humility that marked Saul at the start has given way to pride and self-will, and pride goes before destruction (Proverbs 16:18). God keeps the same rule all through Scripture. Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted (Matthew 23:12), and God resists the proud and gives grace to the humble (James 4:6). In the very next chapter he chooses David, and tells Samuel that the LORD looks on the heart (1 Samuel 16:7).

For us, to be little in our own sight is to know that every strength, gift and success we have comes from God. It is a humble dependence on him, and it sits comfortably with confidence in the abilities he gives. Paul learned that Christ’s power is made perfect in weakness, so that when he was weak, then he was strong (2 Corinthians 12:9–10).

Why did God choose Saul if he knew Saul would fail?

God knew the end of Saul’s reign from its beginning, and he worked through Saul’s own choices toward his larger purpose. Scripture lays the failure at Saul’s door, in his disobedience, self-will and pride, and God had given him both the help and the opportunity to do right. Saul’s reign also taught Israel, as it became a kingdom, what a king must be: a faithful servant of God, whatever his gifts in battle. It taught the lesson of this passage too, that obedience comes before sacrifice. Through it all God’s plan was moving toward the King who would obey him perfectly.

The command, and the swoop on the spoil

Samuel restates the command so that it stands plainly beside what Saul did. “And the LORD sent thee on a journey”. The word for journey, derek, is a road, from a root meaning to tread, and it is used figuratively for a course of action. Saul’s campaign was a mission the LORD gave and a path the LORD laid out for him.

The command was to “utterly destroy the sinners the Amalekites”. The word for sinners, chaṭṭâʼ, names people: a criminal, or one accounted guilty. God names the Amalekites as guilty, and their long record of hostility gives the reason for the sentence. To utterly destroy, châram, is to devote something by a ban, especially to destruction, and here the ban covered everyone and everything Amalek had. Then comes “fight against them until they be consumed”. The verb kâlâh means to end, be finished, perish or consume, and the fighting was to go on until Amalek came to its end. The psalmist says that God has commanded his precepts to be kept diligently (Psalm 119:4), and the command Saul received was as clear as a command can be.

Verse 19 asks why. “Wherefore then didst thou not obey the voice of the LORD”. The verb shâmaʻ means to hear, and it carries the sense of attention and obedience, a hearing that leads to doing. Saul had heard the command and understood it, so his failure lay in his will. The voice he disregarded was the LORD’s own, which made his disobedience an offence against God himself.

“But didst fly upon the spoil”. The verb ʻîyṭ means to swoop down upon, the way a bird of prey drops on its victim, and it pictures the greedy haste with which Saul and his men fell on the plunder. The spoil, shâlâl, is the goods taken in war. This spoil was under the ban, so in seizing it Israel took what had been given over to the LORD for destruction, and the swoop shows a heart that put gain first. The same swoop shows itself today whenever someone grabs at what God has forbidden: cutting corners in business for profit, indulging sinful pleasures, clinging to possessions when God calls for generosity, or chasing ambition at the cost of integrity.

“And didst evil in the sight of the LORD”. The word for evil, raʻ, means bad, and evil in the moral sense, and the word for sight, ʻayin, is the eye. Saul could call his choice practical, or even devout, since the animals were meant for the altar, and the LORD’s eye judged it evil. God judges by his revealed will and by the heart. Proverbs says the same, that the LORD prefers righteousness and justice to sacrifice (Proverbs 21:3).

“I have obeyed”: Saul’s defence

Saul’s reply begins, “Yea, I have obeyed the voice of the LORD”. The verb for “said”, ʼâmar, is the ordinary word for speaking, and the “Yea” is emphatic, “indeed” or “surely”. Saul answers Samuel’s question in Samuel’s own words, with the same verb shâmaʻ, and he claims full obedience. He may have been trying to convince Samuel, and he may have half convinced himself.

His defence is built from partial truths. “I have gone the way which the LORD sent me” uses derek, the same word as “journey” in verse 18, with yâlak, to walk. He did march to Amalek and fight, so the road was right, and the course of action the LORD set for that road was the part he abandoned. “I have brought Agag the king of Amalek” is offered as part of his obedience, and it is the plainest admission of disobedience in the verse. Agag was a king, melek, under the same ban as his people, and Saul brought him home alive. Saul may have wanted him as a trophy to lead in triumph, or as a hostage or a piece in politics, and Scripture leaves the reason unstated. Finally, “I have utterly destroyed the Amalekites” uses châram, the very verb of the command. Many Amalekites had died, and yet with their king alive and the best of their flocks in Israel’s hands, Saul was stretching the word of the command to fit what he had done.

Jesus asks why people call him Lord, Lord, and leave undone what he says (Luke 6:46), and James writes that whoever keeps the whole law and stumbles in one point is guilty of all (James 2:10). Partial obedience is disobedience in God’s eyes.

Verse 21 shifts the blame. “But the people took of the spoil, sheep and oxen”. Saul names the people, and the people did share in the wrong, since the failure to keep the decree was a common one. The spoil, shâlâl, is again the plunder of war. “The chief of the things which should have been utterly destroyed” uses the word chêrem, the thing devoted, set apart from common use and given over to God, usually for destruction. They took the best of it, the very things most plainly meant for the ban.

“To sacrifice unto the LORD thy God in Gilgal”. To sacrifice, zâbach, is to slaughter an animal, usually as an offering. Saul gives a pious reason for keeping what God had condemned, as though a good intention could make a disobedient act holy. Moses had told Israel to keep God’s command whole, adding to it and taking from it alike forbidden (Deuteronomy 12:32), and Jesus quoted the prophet against people who honour God with their lips while their hearts are far from him (Matthew 15:8–9). Saul also says “the LORD thy God”, as if he were speaking of Samuel’s God, which may hint at how far he had drifted from the God he was meant to obey.

Gilgal deepens the sorrow of it. It was Israel’s first camp after crossing the Jordan into the land (Joshua 4:19). There the new generation was circumcised, the LORD rolled away the reproach of Egypt, and Israel kept its first Passover in the land (Joshua 5:2–10). A place of covenant renewal and faithful worship was now to host a sacrifice taken from disobedience.

Did the people believe they were doing right?

Their motives were most likely mixed. Some among the people may sincerely have thought an offering to the LORD a good use of the best animals. Others were covering greed with piety, or going along with Saul, who may have wanted the best for himself or for a triumph. Either way they had taken what God had commanded to be destroyed, and Samuel’s answer shows that God saw the disobedience beneath the devotion. A sincere belief built on setting aside God’s plain word is a mistaken one.

To obey is better than sacrifice

Samuel answers with a question of his own: “Hath the LORD as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the LORD?” The word for delight, chêphets, means pleasure, delight or desire. Burnt offerings, ʻôlâh, were burned whole on the altar, and sacrifices, zebach, covered a wider class, including peace offerings that the worshipper shared in eating. Both were costly, and both were given by God himself in the law of Moses. The question has an obvious answer, and Samuel gives it.

“Behold” calls Saul to look and listen. “To obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.” Better, ṭôwb, is the ordinary word for good, used here to rank one thing above another. To obey is shâmaʻ once more, the verb of Samuel’s charge in verse 19 and of Saul’s claim in verse 20. To hearken, qâshab, is to listen attentively, with action following. The fat, cheleb, was the richest part of the animal and was offered to God as the best of the sacrifice. The two lines say the same thing twice, in the manner of Hebrew poetry, and so they make a saying that is easy to remember. Saul came with the best of Amalek’s flocks, and Samuel tells him that the finest part of the finest ram weighs less with the LORD than an ear that listens to him and a will that does what it hears.

The prophets after Samuel come back to this again and again. Through Hosea the LORD says, “I desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings” (Hosea 6:6). David says that the sacrifices God wants are a broken spirit and a contrite heart (Psalm 51:16–17), and Micah asks what the LORD requires of his people and answers with justice, mercy and a humble walk with God (Micah 6:6–8). The law had told Israel to follow the LORD and obey his voice (Deuteronomy 13:4), and through Jeremiah the LORD gives the same charge, “Obey my voice” (Jeremiah 7:23).

Does this make sacrifice and worship worthless?

Samuel puts sacrifice in its place, as something that rests on obedience and flows from it. God himself instituted Israel’s sacrifices as the way of atonement, thanksgiving and fellowship with him, and he delights in worship that comes from an obedient heart. What Samuel rebukes is sacrifice used as a cover for disobedience or offered in place of it. When Hosea says “not sacrifice”, he means that an offering with the heart missing from it is empty. The sacrifice itself was good.

Rebellion, idolatry and a rejected king

Samuel now names Saul’s sin for what it is. “For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft”. The word for rebellion, mᵉrîy, carries the sense of bitterness and so of open defiance against a rightful authority. Witchcraft is qeçem, divination or sorcery, and the word for sin, chaṭṭâʼâh, means sin and is also used for the sin offering. The law had forbidden divination and every such practice as an abomination to the LORD (Deuteronomy 18:10–12).

“And stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry”. Stubbornness, pâtsar, is obstinacy, a refusal to yield to a command. Iniquity, ʼâven, means nothingness, trouble or wickedness, and idolatry is tᵉrâphîym, the household idols or images that stood for a turning away from the worship of the LORD alone. Saul’s stubborn insistence on his own way set up his own will in the place that belonged to God.

Then comes the sentence: “Because thou hast rejected the word of the LORD, he hath also rejected thee from being king.” The verb mâʼaç, to reject, spurn, despise or cast off, stands twice, and the two halves of the sentence answer each other. Saul cast off the dâbâr, the word of the LORD, and the LORD cast him off from being melek, king. The judgment fits the sin exactly. It ended God’s favour on Saul’s reign and on any dynasty after him, and in the next chapter the LORD sends Samuel to anoint another king (1 Samuel 16:1), one who would have the wholehearted obedience Saul lacked.

Why are rebellion and stubbornness compared with witchcraft and idolatry?

Witchcraft and idolatry both seek guidance, power or loyalty from something other than the one true God, and both put something in his place. Rebellion does the same with the self. It says in effect, “My will is above God’s will,” and it tries to steer events apart from his revealed word, just as divination does. Saul consulted no medium and bowed to no image here, yet the spirit of what he did was the same, a refusal of God’s rule.

Does God reject people today as he rejected Saul?

The rejection in this verse is from being king, and what Saul lost was his throne and his line. For believers, salvation in Christ rests on grace received through faith (Ephesians 2:8–9). Persistent disobedience still has consequences, among them the loss of blessing, fruitfulness and opportunities to serve, and the Lord’s discipline, which he gives to those he loves (Hebrews 12:5–11). Scripture warns believers against hardening their hearts (Hebrews 3:7–19), and it shows obedience as the mark of love for Christ. God’s desire toward a rebellious heart is always repentance and restoration.

Christ, the King who obeyed

Saul was anointed king, and he lost the kingdom through pride and disobedience. Jesus is the King who humbled himself. Though he was God, he “made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men,” and he obeyed even to death on a cross (Philippians 2:6–8). He was anointed by the Spirit to preach good news to the poor, heal the brokenhearted and set captives free (Luke 4:18–19). He came down from heaven to do the will of the one who sent him (John 6:38), and doing that will and finishing his work was his meat (John 4:34).

In him obedience and sacrifice meet. He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29), and his offering of himself was itself the doing of the Father’s will (Hebrews 10:5–10). He learned obedience and became the source of eternal salvation to all who obey him (Hebrews 5:8–9). By one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, and by the obedience of one many are made righteous (Romans 5:19). Saul kept back what lay under the ban, and Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law (Galatians 3:13) by bearing that curse himself. Through his death he destroyed the power of death (Hebrews 2:14), and he disarmed principalities and powers and triumphed over them (Colossians 2:15). Where Saul was rejected, God raised Christ and set him far above every rule and authority (Ephesians 1:20–22), and all of it comes from God’s love for the world (John 3:16).

Saul spared what God had condemned, and those who belong to Christ are called by the Spirit to put to death the deeds of the body (Romans 8:13) and their earthly members (Colossians 3:5). Our wrestling is against spiritual powers of wickedness, beyond flesh and blood (Ephesians 6:12), and in Christ we are more than conquerors (Romans 8:37). Offered through him, our own lives become a living sacrifice that God accepts (Romans 12:1).

The God who delights to be heard

This passage shows us a God who lifts up the small, who speaks plainly, and who delights to be heard. Saul received a kingdom when he thought little of himself, and the same God still gives grace to the humble. The LORD told Saul exactly what he wanted, and he has told us in his word what pleases him, so the obedience he asks of us is an answer to a voice we have already heard.

The passage also shows how readily disobedience dresses itself up, in a half-truth, in blame laid on others, in an offering at a holy place. The LORD sees through all of it, and he prizes a listening heart above the richest gift we could bring. That would be a heavy word on its own, for every one of us has fallen short of it. The King Saul failed to be has come. Jesus obeyed perfectly, offered himself as the sacrifice the Father willed, and by his obedience many are made righteous. His own words gather it up: “If ye love me, keep my commandments” (John 14:15). The obedience God delights in is the answer of people he has already loved and saved.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers 1 Samuel 15:10–23. He set out his notes in a three-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 14 verses
Passage under comment1 Samuel 15:10–23
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Saul is here called to account by Samuel concerning the execution of his commission against the Amalekites; and remarkable instances we are here furnished with of the strictness of the justice of God and the treachery and deceitfulness of the heart of man. We are here told,

I.What passed between God and Samuel, in secret, upon this occasion, 1 Samuel 15:10, 1 Samuel 15:11.

1.God determines Saul's rejection, and acquaints Samuel with it: It repenteth me that I have set up Saul to be king. Repentance in God is not, as it is in us, a change of his mind, but a change of his method or dispensation. He does not alter his will, but wills an alteration. The change was in Saul: He has turned back from following me; this construction God put upon the partiality of his obedience, and the prevalency of his covetousness. And hereby he did himself make God his enemy. God repented that he had given Saul the kingdom and the honour and power that belonged to it: but he never repented that he had given any man wisdom and grace, and his fear and love; these gifts and callings of God are without repentance.

2.Samuel laments and deprecates it. It grieved Samuel that Saul had forfeited God's favour, and that God had resolved to cast him off; and he cried unto the Lord all night, spent a whole night in interceding for him, that this decree might not go forth against him. When others were in their beds sleeping, he was upon his knees praying and wrestling with God. He did not thus deprecate his own exclusion from the government; nor was he secretly pleased, as many a one would have been, that Saul, who succeeded him, was so soon laid aside, but on the contrary prayed earnestly for his establishment, so far was he from desiring that woeful day. The rejection of sinners is the grief of good people; God delights not in their death, nor should we.

II.What passed between Samuel and Saul in public.

Samuel, being sent of God to him with these heavy tidings, went, as Ezekiel, in bitterness of soul, to meet him, perhaps according to an appointment when Saul went forth on this expedition, for Saul had come to Gilgal (1 Samuel 15:12), the place where he was made king (1 Samuel 11:15), and were now he would have been confirmed if he had approved himself well in the trial of his obedience. But Samuel was informed that Saul had set up a triumphal arch, or some monument of his victory, at Carmel, a city in the mountains of Judah, seeking his own honour more than the honour of God, for he set up this place (or hand, as the word is) for himself (he had more need to have been repenting of his sin and making his peace with God than boasting of his victory), and also that he had marched in great state to Gilgal, for this seems to be intimated in the manner of expression: He has gone about, and passed on, and gone down, with a great deal of pomp and parade. There Samuel gave him the meeting, and,

1.Saul makes his boast to Samuel of his obedience, because that was the thing by which he was now to signalize himself (1 Samuel 15:13): "Blessed be thou of the Lord, for thou sendest me upon a good errand, in which I have had great success, and I have performed the commandment of the Lord." It is very likely, if his conscience had now flown in his face at this time and charged him with disobedience, he would not have been so forward to proclaim his disobedience; for by this he hoped to prevent Samuel's reproving him. Thus sinners think, by justifying themselves, to escape being judged of the Lord; whereas the only way to do that is by judging ourselves. Those that boast most of their religion may be suspected of partiality and hypocrisy in it.

2.Samuel convicts him by a plain demonstration of his disobedience. "Hast thou performed the commandment of the Lord? What means then the bleating of the sheep?" 1 Samuel 15:14. Saul would needs have it thought than God Almighty was wonderfully beholden to him for the good service he had done; but Samuel shows him that God was so far from being a debtor to him that he had just cause of action against him, and produces for evidence the bleating of the sheep, and the lowing of the oxen, which perhaps Saul appointed to bring up the rear of his triumph, but Samuel appears to them as witnesses against him. He needed not go far to disprove his professions. The noise the cattle made (like the rust of silver, James 5:3) would be a witness against him. Note, It is no new thing for the plausible professions and protestations of hypocrites to be contradicted and disproved by the most plain and undeniable evidence. Many boast of their obedience to the command of God; but what mean then their indulgence of the flesh, their love of the world, their passion and uncharitableness, and their neglect of holy duties, which witness against them?

3.Saul insists upon his own justification against this charge, 1 Samuel 15:15. The fact he cannot deny; the sheep and oxen were brought from the Amalekites. But,

(1.)It was not his fault, for the people spared them; as if they durst have done it without the express orders of Saul, when they knew it was against the express orders of Samuel. Note, Those that are willing to justify themselves are commonly very forward to condemn others, and to lay the blame upon any rather than take it to themselves. Sin is a brat that nobody cares to have laid at his doors. It is the sorry subterfuge of an impenitent heart, that will not confess its guilt, to lay the blame on those that were tempters, or partners, or only followers in it.

(2.)It was with a good intention: "It was to sacrifice to the Lord thy God. He is thy God, and thou wilt not be against any thing that is done, as this is, for his honour." This was a false plea, for both Saul and the people designed their own profit in sparing the cattle. But, if it had been true, it would still have been frivolous, for God hates robbery for burnt-offering. God appointed these cattle to be sacrificed to him in the field, and therefore will give those no thanks that bring them to be sacrificed at his altar; for he will be served in his own way, and according to the rule he himself has prescribed. Nor will a good intention justify a bad action.

4.Samuel overrules, or rather overlooks, his plea, and proceeds, in God's name, to give judgment against him. He premises his authority. What he was about to say was what the Lord had said to him (1 Samuel 15:16), otherwise he would have been far from passing so severe a censure upon him. Those who complain that their ministers are too harsh with them should remember that, while they keep to the word of God, they are but messengers, and must say as they are bidden, and therefore be willing, as Saul himself here was, that they should say on. Samuel delivers his message faithfully.

(1.)He reminds Saul of the honour of God had done him in making him king (1 Samuel 15:17), when he was little in his own sight. God regarded the lowness of his state and rewarded the lowliness of his spirit. Note, Those that are advanced to honour and wealth ought often to remember their mean beginnings, that they may never think highly of themselves, but always study to do great things for the God that had advanced them.

(2.)He lays before him the plainness of the orders he was to execute (1 Samuel 15:18): The Lord sent thee on a journey; so easy was the service, and so certain the success, that it was rather to be called a journey than a war. The work was honourable, to destroy the sworn enemies of God and Israel; and had he denied himself, and set aside the consideration of his own profit so far as to have destroyed all that belonged to Amalek, he would have been no loser by it at last, nor have gone this warfare on his own charges. God would no doubt have made it up to him, so that he should have no need of spoil. And therefore,

(3.)He shows him how inexcusable he was in aiming to make a profit of this expedition, and to enrich himself by it (1 Samuel 15:19): "Wherefore then didst thou fly upon the spoil, and convert that to thy own use which was to have been destroyed for God's honour?" See what evil the love of money is the root of; but see what is the sinfulness of sin, and that in it which above any thing else makes it evil in the sight of the Lord. It is disobedience: Thou didst not obey the voice of the Lord.

5.Saul repeats his vindication of himself, as that which, in defiance of conviction, he resolved to abide by, 1 Samuel 15:20, 1 Samuel 15:21. He denies the charge (1 Samuel 15:20): "Yea, I have obeyed, I have done all I should do;" for he had done all which he thought he needed to do, so much wiser was he in his own eyes than God himself. God bade him kill all, and yet he puts in among the instances of his obedience that he brought Agag alive, which he thought was as good as if he had killed him. Thus carnal deceitful hearts think to excuse themselves from God's commandments with their own equivalents. He insists upon it that he has utterly destroyed the Amalekites themselves, which was the main thing intended; but, as to the spoil, he owns it should have been utterly destroyed; so that he knew his Lord's will, and was under no mistake about the command. But he thought that would be wilful waste; the cattle of the Midianites was taken for a prey in Moses's time (Numbers 31:32, etc.), and why not the cattle of the Amalekites now? Better it should be prey to the Israelites than to the fowls of the air and the wild beasts; and therefore he connived at the people's carrying it away. But it was their doing and not his; and, besides, it was for sacrifice to the Lord here at Gilgal, whither they were now bringing them. See what a hard thing it is to convince the children of disobedience of their sin and to strip them of their fig-leaves.

6.Samuel gives a full answer to his apology, since he did insist upon it, 1 Samuel 15:22, 1 Samuel 15:23. He appeals to his own conscience: Has the Lord as great delight in sacrifices as in obedience? Though Saul was not a man of any great acquaintance with religion, yet he could not but know this,

(1.)That nothing is so pleasing to God as obedience, no, not sacrifice and offering, and the fat of rams. See here what we should seek and aim at in all the exercises of religion, even acceptance with God, that he may delight in what we do. If God be well pleased with us and our services, we are happy, we have gained our point, but otherwise to what purpose is it? Isaiah 1:11. Now here we are plainly told that humble, sincere, and conscientious obedience to the will of God, is more pleasing and acceptable to him than all burnt-offerings and sacrifices. A careful conformity to moral precepts recommends us to God more than all ceremonial observances, Micah 6:6-8; Hosea 6:6. Obedience is enjoyed by the eternal law of nature, but sacrifice only by a positive law. Obedience was the law of innocency, but sacrifice supposes sin come into the world, and is but a feeble attempt to take that away which obedience would have prevented. God is more glorified and self more denied by obedience than by sacrifice. It is much easier to bring a bullock or lamb to be burnt upon the altar than to bring every high thought into obedience to God and the will subject to his will. Obedience is the glory of angels (Psalm 103:20), and it will be ours.

(2.)That nothing is so provoking to God as disobedience, setting up our wills in competition with his. This is here called rebellion and stubbornness, and is said to be as bad as witchcraft and idolatry, 1 Samuel 15:23. It is as bad to set up other gods as to live in disobedience to the true God. Those that are governed by their own corrupt inclinations, in opposition to the command of God, do, in effect, consult the teraphim (as the word here is for idolatry) or the diviners. It was disobedience that made us all sinners (Romans 5:19), and this is the malignity of sin, that it is the transgression of the law, and consequently it is enmity to God, Romans 8:7. Saul was a king, but if he disobey the command of God, his royal dignity and power will not excuse him from the guilt of rebellion and stubbornness. It is not the rebellion of the people against their prince, but of a prince against God, that this text speaks of.

7.He reads his doom: in short, "Because thou has rejected the word of the Lord, hast despised it (so the Chaldee), hast made nothing of it (so the Septuagint), hast cast off the government of it, therefore he has rejected thee, despised and made nothing of thee, but cast thee off from being king. He that made thee king has determined to unmake thee again." Those are unfit and unworthy to rule over men who are not willing that God should rule over them.

Historical interpretation

Historical reception

2 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

2 quotes · AD 373–435
Post-Nicene
400

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

d. AD 373Athanasius of AlexandriaPost-NiceneSourceLETTER TO THE BISHOPS OF EGYPT 1.11
And when Saul was charged with negligence and a breach of the law, he did not benefit his cause by alleging his conduct on other matters. For a defense on one count will not operate to obtain an acquittal on another count. But if all things should be done according to law and justice, one must defend himself in those particulars wherein he is accused and must either disprove the past or else confess it with the promise that he will desist and do so no more. But if he is guilty of the crime and will not confess, but in order to conceal the truth speaks on other points instead of the one in question, he shows plainly that he has acted amiss and is conscious of his delinquency.
d. AD 435John CassianPost-NiceneSourceCONFERENCE 2.3.1
Finally, because he never had this eye of discretion, he who by God’s judgment first deserved to rule over the people of Israel was cast out of his kingdom like something dark out of a healthy body. Having been deceived by the darkness and error of this light, he decided that his own sacrifices were more acceptable to God than obedience to Samuel’s command, and in the very act by which he had hoped that he would propitiate the divine majesty he committed sin instead.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying 1 Samuel 15:19 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8