TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Commentary on 1 Samuel 15 verses 10–23
Saul is here called to account by Samuel concerning the execution of his commission against the Amalekites; and remarkable instances we are here furnished with of the strictness of the justice of God and the treachery and deceitfulness of the heart of man. We are here told,
I. What passed between God and Samuel, in secret, upon this occasion, Sa1 15:10, Sa1 15:11. 1. God determines Saul's rejection, and acquaints Samuel with it: It repenteth me that I have set up Saul to be king. Repentance in God is not, as it is in us, a change of his mind, but a change of his method or dispensation. He does not alter his will, but wills an alteration. The change was in Saul: He has turned back from following me; this construction God put upon the partiality of his obedience, and the prevalency of his covetousness. And hereby he did himself make God his enemy. God repented that he had given Saul the kingdom and the honour and power that belonged to it: but he never repented that he had given any man wisdom and grace, and his fear and love; these gifts and callings of God are without repentance. 2. Samuel laments and deprecates it. It grieved Samuel that Saul had forfeited God's favour, and that God had resolved to cast him off; and he cried unto the Lord all night, spent a whole night in interceding for him, that this decree might not go forth against him. When others were in their beds sleeping, he was upon his knees praying and wrestling with God. He did not thus deprecate his own exclusion from the government; nor was he secretly pleased, as many a one would have been, that Saul, who succeeded him, was so soon laid aside, but on the contrary prayed earnestly for his establishment, so far was he from desiring that woeful day. The rejection of sinners is the grief of good people; God delights not in their death, nor should we.
II. What passed between Samuel and Saul in public. Samuel, being sent of God to him with these heavy tidings, went, as Ezekiel, in bitterness of soul, to meet him, perhaps according to an appointment when Saul went forth on this expedition, for Saul had come to Gilgal (Sa1 15:12), the place where he was made king (Sa1 11:15), and were now he would have been confirmed if he had approved himself well in the trial of his obedience. But Samuel was informed that Saul had set up a triumphal arch, or some monument of his victory, at Carmel, a city in the mountains of Judah, seeking his own honour more than the honour of God, for he set up this place (or hand, as the word is) for himself (he had more need to have been repenting of his sin and making his peace with God than boasting of his victory), and also that he had marched in great state to Gilgal, for this seems to be intimated in the manner of expression: He has gone about, and passed on, and gone down, with a great deal of pomp and parade. There Samuel gave him the meeting, and,
1.Saul makes his boast to Samuel of his obedience, because that was the thing by which he was now to signalize himself (Sa1 15:13): "Blessed be thou of the Lord, for thou sendest me upon a good errand, in which I have had great success, and I have performed the commandment of the Lord." It is very likely, if his conscience had now flown in his face at this time and charged him with disobedience, he would not have been so forward to proclaim his disobedience; for by this he hoped to prevent Samuel's reproving him. Thus sinners think, by justifying themselves, to escape being judged of the Lord; whereas the only way to do that is by judging ourselves. Those that boast most of their religion may be suspected of partiality and hypocrisy in it.
2.Samuel convicts him by a plain demonstration of his disobedience. "Hast thou performed the commandment of the Lord? What means then the bleating of the sheep?" Sa1 15:14. Saul would needs have it thought than God Almighty was wonderfully beholden to him for the good service he had done; but Samuel shows him that God was so far from being a debtor to him that he had just cause of action against him, and produces for evidence the bleating of the sheep, and the lowing of the oxen, which perhaps Saul appointed to bring up the rear of his triumph, but Samuel appears to them as witnesses against him. He needed not go far to disprove his professions. The noise the cattle made (like the rust of silver, Jam 5:3) would be a witness against him. Note, It is no new thing for the plausible professions and protestations of hypocrites to be contradicted and disproved by the most plain and undeniable evidence. Many boast of their obedience to the command of God; but what mean then their indulgence of the flesh, their love of the world, their passion and uncharitableness, and their neglect of holy duties, which witness against them?
3.Saul insists upon his own justification against this charge, Sa1 15:15. The fact he cannot deny; the sheep and oxen were brought from the Amalekites. But, (1.) It was not his fault, for the people spared them; as if they durst have done it without the express orders of Saul, when they knew it was against the express orders of Samuel. Note, Those that are willing to justify themselves are commonly very forward to condemn others, and to lay the blame upon any rather than take it to themselves. Sin is a brat that nobody cares to have laid at his doors. It is the sorry subterfuge of an impenitent heart, that will not confess its guilt, to lay the blame on those that were tempters, or partners, or only followers in it. (2.) It was with a good intention: "It was to sacrifice to the Lord thy God. He is thy God, and thou wilt not be against any thing that is done, as this is, for his honour." This was a false plea, for both Saul and the people designed their own profit in sparing the cattle. But, if it had been true, it would still have been frivolous, for God hates robbery for burnt-offering. God appointed these cattle to be sacrificed to him in the field, and therefore will give those no thanks that bring them to be sacrificed at his altar; for he will be served in his own way, and according to the rule he himself has prescribed. Nor will a good intention justify a bad action.
4.Samuel overrules, or rather overlooks, his plea, and proceeds, in God's name, to give judgment against him. He premises his authority. What he was about to say was what the Lord had said to him (Sa1 15:16), otherwise he would have been far from passing so severe a censure upon him. Those who complain that their ministers are too harsh with them should remember that, while they keep to the word of God, they are but messengers, and must say as they are bidden, and therefore be willing, as Saul himself here was, that they should say on. Samuel delivers his message faithfully. (1.) He reminds Saul of the honour of God had done him in making him king (Sa1 15:17), when he was little in his own sight. God regarded the lowness of his state and rewarded the lowliness of his spirit. Note, Those that are advanced to honour and wealth ought often to remember their mean beginnings, that they may never think highly of themselves, but always study to do great things for the God that had advanced them. (2.) He lays before him the plainness of the orders he was to execute (Sa1 15:18): The Lord sent thee on a journey; so easy was the service, and so certain the success, that it was rather to be called a journey than a war. The work was honourable, to destroy the sworn enemies of God and Israel; and had he denied himself, and set aside the consideration of his own profit so far as to have destroyed all that belonged to Amalek, he would have been no loser by it at last, nor have gone this warfare on his own charges. God would no doubt have made it up to him, so that he should have no need of spoil. And therefore, (3.) He shows him how inexcusable he was in aiming to make a profit of this expedition, and to enrich himself by it (Sa1 15:19): "Wherefore then didst thou fly upon the spoil, and convert that to thy own use which was to have been destroyed for God's honour?" See what evil the love of money is the root of; but see what is the sinfulness of sin, and that in it which above any thing else makes it evil in the sight of the Lord. It is disobedience: Thou didst not obey the voice of the Lord.
5.Saul repeats his vindication of himself, as that which, in defiance of conviction, he resolved to abide by, Sa1 15:20, Sa1 15:21. He denies the charge (Sa1 15:20): "Yea, I have obeyed, I have done all I should do;" for he had done all which he thought he needed to do, so much wiser was he in his own eyes than God himself. God bade him kill all, and yet he puts in among the instances of his obedience that he brought Agag alive, which he thought was as good as if he had killed him. Thus carnal deceitful hearts think to excuse themselves from God's commandments with their own equivalents. He insists upon it that he has utterly destroyed the Amalekites themselves, which was the main thing intended; but, as to the spoil, he owns it should have been utterly destroyed; so that he knew his Lord's will, and was under no mistake about the command. But he thought that would be wilful waste; the cattle of the Midianites was taken for a prey in Moses's time (Num 31:32, etc.), and why not the cattle of the Amalekites now? Better it should be prey to the Israelites than to the fowls of the air and the wild beasts; and therefore he connived at the people's carrying it away. But it was their doing and not his; and, besides, it was for sacrifice to the Lord here at Gilgal, whither they were now bringing them. See what a hard thing it is to convince the children of disobedience of their sin and to strip them of their fig-leaves.
6.Samuel gives a full answer to his apology, since he did insist upon it, Sa1 15:22, Sa1 15:23. He appeals to his own conscience: Has the Lord as great delight in sacrifices as in obedience? Though Saul was not a man of any great acquaintance with religion, yet he could not but know this, (1.) That nothing is so pleasing to God as obedience, no, not sacrifice and offering, and the fat of rams. See here what we should seek and aim at in all the exercises of religion, even acceptance with God, that he may delight in what we do. If God be well pleased with us and our services, we are happy, we have gained our point, but otherwise to what purpose is it? Isa 1:11. Now here we are plainly told that humble, sincere, and conscientious obedience to the will of God, is more pleasing and acceptable to him than all burnt-offerings and sacrifices. A careful conformity to moral precepts recommends us to God more than all ceremonial observances, Mic 6:6-8; Hos 6:6. Obedience is enjoyed by the eternal law of nature, but sacrifice only by a positive law. Obedience was the law of innocency, but sacrifice supposes sin come into the world, and is but a feeble attempt to take that away which obedience would have prevented. God is more glorified and self more denied by obedience than by sacrifice. It is much easier to bring a bullock or lamb to be burnt upon the altar than to bring every high thought into obedience to God and the will subject to his will. Obedience is the glory of angels (Psa 103:20), and it will be ours. (2.) That nothing is so provoking to God as disobedience, setting up our wills in competition with his. This is here called rebellion and stubbornness, and is said to be as bad as witchcraft and idolatry, Sa1 15:23. It is as bad to set up other gods as to live in disobedience to the true God. Those that are governed by their own corrupt inclinations, in opposition to the command of God, do, in effect, consult the teraphim (as the word here is for idolatry) or the diviners. It was disobedience that made us all sinners (Rom 5:19), and this is the malignity of sin, that it is the transgression of the law, and consequently it is enmity to God, Rom 8:7. Saul was a king, but if he disobey the command of God, his royal dignity and power will not excuse him from the guilt of rebellion and stubbornness. It is not the rebellion of the people against their prince, but of a prince against God, that this text speaks of.
7.He reads his doom: in short, "Because thou has rejected the word of the Lord, hast despised it (so the Chaldee), hast made nothing of it (so the Septuagint), hast cast off the government of it, therefore he has rejected thee, despised and made nothing of thee, but cast thee off from being king. He that made thee king has determined to unmake thee again." Those are unfit and unworthy to rule over men who are not willing that God should rule over them.
And Saul said: They brought them from Amalek, etc. The prophet, though unwilling, confesses this with a guilty conscience; for not only to God, to whose eyes all things are naked and open, but also to spiritual men, the deceitful hearts of the wicked are evident. For Elisha, though Gehazi was far away, was present in heart. And the Apostle, absent in body, but present in spirit, rebukes the sinner in Corinth. From the examples, he says, they brought back the manifold cries of brutish and lascivious desires. The imprudent mind spared these vices, which seemed less harmful, nor did it care to destroy them; rather, it considered these very things as virtues, and thought they should be gratefully offered to their author. For example, by considering foolishness as simplicity, calling the insolence of anger the zeal of Phinehas and Elijah, considering the sluggishness of sloth as the patience of David, and calling the tightness of parsimony the discretion of moderation; and notably, and equally to be avoided, is the most depraved habit of the wicked, who are accustomed to accumulate their faults by excusing them. For behold, Saul claims that he, along with the people, killed those things which, at the Lord's command, were to be killed; but he asserts that the people, not he, spared those things which were reserved against His interdiction. And many negligent and lazy people, if they have overcome any vices, or think they have overcome them, do not attribute this to the grace of the author, but to their own effort. But whatever they do not want or cannot extinguish in themselves, they claim that these are due to the flaw of an inherent nature, so that indirectly, and as a cause of human guilt, they may ascribe it back to the Author of nature Himself.
Continue studying 1 Samuel 15:15 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
In 1 Samuel 15:15, King Saul offers a deceptive justification to the prophet Samuel for his blatant disobedience regarding God's explicit command to utterly destroy the Amalekites. He attempts to deflect personal responsibility by claiming "the people" spared the choicest livestock, not out of greed or defiance, but with the pious intention of sacrificing them to "the LORD thy God." This pivotal moment reveals Saul's spiritual immaturity, his fear of human approval over divine command, and his fundamental misunderstanding of genuine obedience, setting the stage for his ultimate rejection as Israel's king.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: This verse is deeply embedded within the climactic narrative of Saul's decline and ultimate rejection as king. Immediately preceding this exchange, God had issued a severe command through Samuel to Saul: execute divine judgment upon the Amalekites, utterly destroying everything—men, women, children, infants, oxen, sheep, camels, and donkeys—as a consequence for their historical hostility towards Israel, particularly their ambush of the vulnerable during the Exodus (1 Samuel 15:3). However, Saul conspicuously spared King Agag and the finest of the livestock. Samuel's arrival and direct confrontation in 1 Samuel 15:14 ("What then is this bleating of the sheep in my ears and the lowing of the oxen that I hear?") directly prompts Saul's self-serving excuse in verse 15. This crucial dialogue then culminates in Samuel's iconic rebuke in 1 Samuel 15:22, emphasizing that "to obey is better than sacrifice." The entire chapter serves as the definitive turning point marking God's rejection of Saul's kingship due to his persistent and defiant disobedience.
Historical & Cultural Context: The Amalekites were a nomadic, predatory people, descendants of Esau, who harbored a deep-seated, generational animosity towards Israel. Their most infamous act was their unprovoked and cowardly attack on the Israelites, targeting the weak and straggling, during their exodus from Egypt (Exodus 17:8-16). This act of malice led God to swear to blot out their memory (Deuteronomy 25:17-19). The command to "utterly destroy" (Hebrew: herem) was a specific form of holy war, where spoils were consecrated to God by being completely destroyed, signifying God's absolute judgment and preventing human gain or defilement from the cursed enemy. Saul's actions directly violated this sacred principle, either out of a desire for personal gain, to appease his soldiers by allowing them plunder, or to elevate himself by bringing back a captive king and valuable spoils, mirroring the practices of other ancient Near Eastern monarchs who sought to display their victories.
Key Themes: This verse powerfully illustrates several crucial theological and narrative themes. The most prominent is the nature of obedience versus disobedience, highlighting that partial obedience, when it compromises God's absolute authority and holiness, is tantamount to complete disobedience in God's eyes. It also showcases blame-shifting and excuse-making, as Saul attempts to deflect personal responsibility onto "the people" and justify his actions with a false pious motive, revealing a lack of integrity. Furthermore, it underscores the profound danger of fearing man over fearing God, suggesting Saul's actions were influenced by a desire for popular approval, material gain, or a perceived strategic advantage rather than prioritizing God's explicit command (Proverbs 29:25). Finally, the passage speaks to the nature of true worship, demonstrating that outward religious acts (like sacrifice) are meaningless, and indeed offensive, when they are used as a substitute for genuine, heartfelt obedience to God's revealed will (Isaiah 1:11-15).
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The passage employs several potent literary devices to underscore Saul's character and the gravity of his actions. Blame-shifting is prominently displayed, as Saul repeatedly attributes the disobedience to "the people" rather than accepting personal responsibility, a rhetorical strategy designed to deflect accountability and preserve his own image. There is a profound irony in Saul's claim that the spared animals were intended "to sacrifice unto the LORD thy God," given that God had already declared His preference for obedience over sacrifice, a truth Samuel would soon articulate directly in 1 Samuel 15:22. This serves as a form of euphemism or false justification, where a seemingly pious motive is used to mask underlying disobedience, potential greed, and a lack of genuine submission. The stark contrast between "the best" being spared and "the rest" being utterly destroyed highlights the selective and self-serving nature of Saul's obedience, revealing a heart that picks and chooses which of God's commands to follow based on personal advantage rather than divine will.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
This verse profoundly illustrates the critical theological principle that God values complete, heartfelt obedience above all else, even above religious ritual or outward acts of worship. Saul's attempt to substitute sacrifice for obedience reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of God's character and His covenant demands. God desires a relationship built on trust, submission to His revealed will, and a heart that prioritizes His commands, not a transactional one where human efforts or religious performances can compensate for direct defiance. This passage serves as a stark warning against partial obedience, self-justification, and the dangerous human tendency to prioritize personal gain or popular approval over divine command. True devotion is demonstrated not by what we say we will do for God, but by our faithful adherence to what He has commanded, reflecting a heart fully surrendered to His sovereignty.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
Saul's excuse in 1 Samuel 15:15 serves as a timeless mirror for believers, challenging us to examine the sincerity and completeness of our own obedience to God. It forces us to confront our natural inclination to rationalize our shortcomings, shift blame, or perform religious acts as a substitute for genuine submission. Are there areas in our lives where we, like Saul, "spare the best" for ourselves—whether it be time, resources, desires, ambitions, or even certain sins—while claiming to be devoted to God? Do we subtly attribute our failures to circumstances or others, rather than humbly confessing our personal responsibility and seeking repentance? This passage calls us to a radical, wholehearted obedience that prioritizes God's explicit commands above all human approval, personal convenience, or perceived gain. It reminds us that true worship is not merely about what we offer, but about how we live in response to God's Word, demonstrating a heart that fears God more than man and trusts Him completely.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was God's command to destroy the Amalekites so severe, including women and children?
Answer: God's command for the utter destruction (herem) of the Amalekites, including all living beings, was a unique act of divine judgment, not a general command for warfare. It stemmed from Amalek's persistent and egregious wickedness, particularly their unprovoked and cowardly attack on the vulnerable Israelites (the elderly, women, and children) during their exodus from Egypt (Exodus 17:8-16). God had sworn to blot out their memory (Deuteronomy 25:17-19) due to their deep-seated evil and unrelenting opposition to His people. This was not arbitrary cruelty but a righteous judgment against a nation that had filled up its measure of iniquity, a demonstration of God's holiness and justice against an utterly corrupt people who posed a continual spiritual and physical threat to Israel's existence and purity. It was a specific, divinely ordained execution of justice for a specific, egregious sin, distinct from general warfare.
What does Saul's use of "the LORD thy God" (rather than "my God") imply about his relationship with God?
Answer: Saul's phrasing, "the LORD thy God," is highly significant and reveals a subtle but profound distancing from God. Instead of referring to God as "my God," which would imply a personal relationship, ownership of the divine command, and a sense of intimate covenant, Saul uses a possessive pronoun that attributes God to Samuel. This suggests a lack of personal devotion, a transactional view of his kingship, and perhaps an attempt to appeal to Samuel's piety or to deflect responsibility by making the issue Samuel's concern rather than his own. It indicates that Saul's relationship with God was not one of intimate, obedient submission, but rather one of external obligation, manipulation, or even spiritual estrangement, highlighting his failure to internalize God's commands as his own.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
Saul's profound failure in 1 Samuel 15:15, marked by partial obedience, blame-shifting, and substituting ritual for genuine submission, stands in stark contrast to the perfect and complete obedience of Jesus Christ. Saul's attempt to offer a "sacrifice" as an excuse for his disobedience foreshadows the profound truth that true worship is found not in human offerings, but in perfect obedience. Where Saul failed to utterly destroy the enemies of God, Jesus perfectly fulfilled the Father's will, utterly destroying the power of sin and death through His perfect obedience unto death on the cross (Philippians 2:8). Unlike Saul, who sought to please men and preserve spoils for personal gain, Jesus declared, "For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will but to do the will of him who sent me" (John 6:38). His life was the ultimate "sacrifice" of obedience, making atonement for our own partial obedience and rebellion. Through His perfect obedience, "many will be made righteous" (Romans 5:19), offering us redemption and a new covenant where God's law is written on our hearts, empowering us to obey Him fully, not out of fear or obligation, but out of love and gratitude for the King who perfectly obeyed and secured our salvation.