דלג לתוכן

Exodus 32:22

“Moses Confronts Aaron and Judges the Sin”· Exodus 32:21–29Read in context
King James Version
And Aaron said, Let not the anger of my lord wax hot: thou knowest the people, that they are set on mischief.
KJV (with Strong's)
And Aaron H175 said H559, Let not the anger H639 of my lord H113 wax hot H2734: thou knowest H3045 the people H5971, that they are set on mischief H7451.
Complete Jewish Bible
Aharon replied, "My lord shouldn't be so angry. You know what these people are like, that they are determined to do evil.
Berean Standard Bible
“Do not be enraged, my lord,” Aaron replied. “You yourself know that the people are intent on evil.
American Standard Version
And Aaron said, Let not the anger of my lord wax hot: thou knowest the people, that they are set on evil.
World English Bible Messianic
Aaron said, “Don’t let the anger of my lord grow hot. You know the people, that they are set on evil.
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then Aaron answered, Let not the wrath of my Lord waxe fearce: Thou knowest this people, that they are euen set on mischiefe.
Young's Literal Translation
and Aaron saith, `Let not the anger of my lord burn; thou--thou hast known the people that it is in evil;
עברית · Modern
ויאמר אהרן אל יחר אף אדני אתה ידעת את העם כי ברע הוא׃
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
The Kingdom of Egypt in the Time of Moses
The Kingdom of Egypt in the Time of Moses View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 2,461 of 31,102 · 7.9%

Study this verse

Summary

Exodus 32:22 records Aaron's attempt to mitigate Moses' righteous anger and deflect blame from himself by attributing the Golden Calf idolatry to the Israelites' inherent depravity. Confronted by Moses' fury over his profound failure in leadership, Aaron appeals to Moses' presumed understanding of the people's rebellious nature, stating, "Let not the anger of my lord wax hot: thou knowest the people, that they [are set] on mischief." This verse starkly reveals Aaron's immediate, self-preserving reaction to accountability, underscoring a critical lapse in his leadership and highlighting the deep-seated human propensity toward sin.

Context

Literary Context

This verse is situated at a pivotal moment immediately following Moses' dramatic descent from Mount Sinai, bearing the divinely inscribed tablets of the Law, only to discover the Israelites engaged in rampant idolatry around a golden calf. Moses' righteous indignation erupts, leading him to shatter the tablets, destroy the calf, and confront Aaron directly about his complicity in this catastrophic apostasy. Aaron's words in this verse serve as his initial, self-preserving response to Moses' pointed accusation in Exodus 32:21: "What did this people do to you that you have brought such a great sin upon them?" Aaron's defense attempts to shift responsibility from his own actions and leadership failure to the uncontrollable, inherently sinful nature of the people. This exchange sets the stage for Moses' subsequent intercession for the people and the Levites' swift action against the idolaters.

Historical & Cultural Context

The incident of the Golden Calf occurs remarkably soon after the Israelites' miraculous deliverance from Egyptian bondage and their solemn covenant with God at Mount Sinai, where they unequivocally pledged allegiance to the Lord alone (Exodus 19:8). Moses' prolonged absence on the mountain, where he was receiving the Law (Exodus 24:18), created a vacuum of leadership and a period of anxiety for the people, who feared Moses would not return. In the ancient Near East, it was common for people to demand visible gods or symbols of divine presence to lead them, especially during times of uncertainty or when their familiar leader was absent. Aaron, as Moses' designated representative and the nascent high priest, was expected to uphold God's commands. His compliance with the people's demand to "make us gods" (Exodus 32:1) and his subsequent fashioning of the calf (Exodus 32:4) represents a profound failure of leadership and a direct, egregious violation of the first two commandments received directly from God's mouth (Exodus 20:3-5).

Key Themes

This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within Exodus and the broader Pentateuch. It highlights the pervasive theme of human sinfulness and rebellion, demonstrating humanity's deep-seated inclination towards idolatry and apostasy, even after experiencing divine deliverance and covenant. It underscores the critical importance of accountability, especially for those in leadership, revealing how easily even spiritual leaders can succumb to peer pressure and compromise divine commands, leading to catastrophic spiritual consequences. The narrative also explores the theme of God's holy wrath and merciful intercession, as Moses' anger mirrors God's righteous indignation, yet Moses' subsequent intercession for the people and Aaron demonstrates the possibility of divine mercy in the face of grave sin. Furthermore, it subtly touches upon the theme of the people's stubbornness and stiff-necked nature, a recurring motif throughout Israel's wilderness journey, which Aaron leverages in his defense.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Wax Hot chârâh' H2734

This verb (H2734) is a primitive root meaning "to glow or grow warm." Figuratively, and most commonly in biblical usage, it means to "blaze up" with intense emotion, particularly anger, zeal, or jealousy. When Aaron pleads, "Let not the anger of my lord wax hot," he is acknowledging the severity of Moses' justified fury, which is burning intensely like a fire. This term often describes God's righteous indignation (e.g., Numbers 11:1), making Aaron's plea a recognition of the profound offense committed and an attempt to de-escalate the immediate, fiery consequences.

Knowest yâdaʻ' H3045

This primitive root (H3045) signifies more than mere intellectual awareness; it implies a deep, experiential understanding, intimate acquaintance, or recognition. By stating "thou knowest the people," Aaron is not simply asserting a fact but appealing to Moses' shared, firsthand experience of the Israelites' stubbornness, their propensity for complaint, and their rebellious tendencies. It is an attempt to forge solidarity with Moses, suggesting that Moses, too, would understand the intractable nature of the people and thus, implicitly, the challenges Aaron faced in leading them. This appeal seeks to shift the focus from Aaron's actions to the people's inherent character.

Mischief raʻ' H7451

This crucial term (H7451) is derived from a root meaning "to break" or "to be evil." While translated as "mischief" in the KJV, the Hebrew word raʻ carries a much stronger and broader meaning, encompassing "evil," "wickedness," "calamity," "harm," or "adversity." Aaron is not suggesting the people are merely playful or troublesome; rather, he is claiming they are inherently inclined toward moral evil, destructive behavior, and a fixed disposition towards rebellion against God and authority. It implies a deep-seated depravity and a deliberate bent towards wrongdoing, which Aaron uses as an excuse for his own failure to resist their demands and uphold God's law.

Verse Breakdown

"And Aaron said, Let not the anger of my lord wax hot"

Aaron's immediate response is a deferential plea to Moses, acknowledging his authority and the intensity of his wrath. This opening phrase is a strategic attempt to calm Moses' righteous indignation, recognizing the gravity of the situation and the potential, severe consequences for himself and the people. It subtly prepares the ground for his subsequent defense by seeking to diffuse the immediate emotional tension.

"thou knowest the people"

This clause is Aaron's direct appeal to Moses' personal experience and intimate understanding of the Israelites. By invoking Moses' shared history with the people, Aaron attempts to establish common ground and subtly deflect personal responsibility. He implies that the people's inherent character is so difficult and prone to sin that even Moses, with all his authority and spiritual insight, would understand the immense challenges Aaron faced in managing them, thereby suggesting that the problem lies with the people, not his leadership.

"that they [are set] on mischief"

This is the core of Aaron's self-justification and blame-shifting. The phrase "[are set] on mischief" conveys a fixed inclination or disposition, indicating that the people are inherently disposed to raʻ (evil, wickedness). Aaron claims the people are uncontrollably and inevitably prone to wrongdoing, suggesting their depravity is the ultimate cause of the idolatry. While containing a kernel of truth about universal human sinfulness, this statement is employed by Aaron as a convenient rationalization for his own failure to resist their demands and uphold God's holy law.

Literary Devices

Exodus 32:22 is rich with literary devices that underscore Aaron's character and the gravity of the moment. Blame Shifting is the most prominent device, as Aaron immediately attempts to divert Moses' anger and his own culpability by attributing the sin to the people's inherent wickedness rather than his own actions and lack of resolve. There is also a notable element of Euphemism in the KJV's translation of "mischief" for the Hebrew raʻ, which is a much stronger word signifying "evil" or "wickedness." This softening of the term, whether by the translator or implicitly by Aaron's intent to lessen the perceived severity, contrasts with the true depth of the people's sin. Aaron's choice of words also employs Pathos, appealing to Moses' presumed empathy and shared frustration with the people's character, hoping to soften the blow of his own accountability by creating a sense of "we're in this together." Furthermore, the statement carries a profound degree of Irony, as Aaron, who was divinely appointed as Moses' spokesman and later as the high priest—a leader meant to guide and intercede—now paints himself as a helpless victim of the very people he was supposed to lead in righteousness.

Theological and Thematic Connections

This verse powerfully highlights the pervasive theological theme of human sinfulness and the deep-seated inclination towards idolatry and rebellion that plagues fallen humanity. Aaron's excuse, while self-serving and a profound failure of leadership, inadvertently points to a fundamental biblical truth about humanity's propensity for evil, a truth echoed throughout the entirety of Scripture. It underscores the critical importance of accountability, especially for those in positions of spiritual leadership, demonstrating how easily even those entrusted with divine authority can succumb to peer pressure and compromise God's explicit commands. The narrative serves as a stark reminder that true, God-honoring leadership requires immense courage to stand against the tide of popular opinion when it contradicts God's revealed will. It also foreshadows the ongoing struggle against idolatry, both overt and subtle, that would characterize Israel's history and remains a challenge for believers today.

Reflection and Application

Aaron's desperate defense in Exodus 32:22 offers timeless lessons on personal responsibility, the nature of sin, and the demands of true leadership. It compels us to honestly examine our own tendencies to deflect blame, to rationalize our shortcomings, or to succumb to the pressures of those around us, whether explicit or implicit. True spiritual maturity and integrity involve humbly acknowledging our failures, taking full ownership of our choices, and seeking God's forgiveness and transforming strength to do what is right, even when it is unpopular, difficult, or costly. As leaders in any sphere—be it the church, our families, or the workplace—we are called to courageously uphold God's standards, resisting the temptation to compromise for the sake of ease, approval, or avoiding conflict. Understanding the pervasive nature of sin in the human heart, as Aaron inadvertently highlights with his excuse, should lead us not to despair or to excuse our own actions, but rather to a deeper appreciation for God's boundless grace and the transformative power of the Holy Spirit, who alone can give us new hearts and new desires that are aligned with His righteous will.

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what situations do I find myself tempted to shift blame or make excuses for my actions, rather than taking full responsibility?
  2. How does Aaron's profound failure to lead in this moment challenge my own understanding of what it means to be a courageous and accountable leader?
  3. What specific steps can I take to better resist peer pressure or popular opinion when it conflicts with clear biblical principles?
  4. What does this passage teach me about the enduring reality of human sinfulness, and how does that understanding deepen my appreciation for God's grace and the need for redemption?

FAQ

Why did Aaron make the Golden Calf in the first place?

Aaron's actions appear to be a direct capitulation to intense popular pressure and fear. When the people grew impatient with Moses' prolonged absence on Mount Sinai, they confronted Aaron, demanding, "Up, make us gods who will go before us; as for this Moses, the man who brought us up from the land of Egypt, we do not know what has become of him" (Exodus 32:1). Instead of resisting this idolatrous demand, Aaron collected their gold, fashioned the calf with an engraving tool, and even proclaimed a "feast to the LORD" in its honor (Exodus 32:4-5). His motivation seems to have been a desire to appease the restless multitude, perhaps fearing their wrath or simply lacking the courage and conviction to stand firm against their blatant idolatrous demands, a profound failure for one designated to lead them in God's ways.

Was Aaron punished for his role in the Golden Calf incident?

While Moses' initial anger was indeed directed at Aaron, and God's wrath burned fiercely against the people, Aaron was not immediately struck down or removed from his position. Moses interceded on his behalf, pleading with God not to destroy him (Deuteronomy 9:20). However, Aaron's actions certainly marred his record and demonstrated a significant lapse in his leadership and faithfulness. He later faced consequences for other acts of disobedience, such as striking the rock instead of speaking to it at Meribah (Numbers 20:12), which prevented him from entering the Promised Land. The Golden Calf incident remains a significant stain on his otherwise pivotal role as Israel's first High Priest, highlighting the constant need for vigilance and faithfulness in leadership.

What does "they are set on mischief" truly imply about the Israelites?

The phrase "they are set on mischief," using the Hebrew word raʻ (evil/wickedness), implies a deep-seated, active inclination towards moral corruption, rebellion, and destructive behavior. Aaron is suggesting that the people are not merely prone to occasional missteps or minor transgressions, but that their very disposition, their inner bent, is towards doing evil and straying from God's commands. While used by Aaron as a self-serving excuse for his own complicity, this statement inadvertently reflects a profound biblical truth about humanity's fallen nature and its inherent propensity to stray from God's ways, as seen in passages like Genesis 8:21 and Psalm 51:5. It speaks to the pervasive and active nature of sin in the human heart, which requires divine intervention for true transformation.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Aaron's failure in Exodus 32:22, where he attempts to deflect blame for the people's profound sin and his own complicity, powerfully foreshadows the desperate need for a perfect High Priest who would never succumb to pressure, compromise God's holy standards, or offer excuses for sin. Unlike Aaron, who could only point to the people's inherent "mischief" as a justification for his own weakness, Jesus Christ is the sinless Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, not by excusing it, but by bearing its full, crushing weight on the cross. He is the faithful and compassionate High Priest who, unlike Aaron, did not need to offer sacrifices for His own sins before interceding for others, for He was "holy, innocent, unstained, separated from sinners" (Hebrews 7:26-27). Where Aaron failed to lead the people in righteousness and instead facilitated their idolatry, Christ perfectly fulfilled the Law and established a new covenant, writing God's laws not on stone tablets, but supernaturally on the hearts and minds of His people (Jeremiah 31:33). Through His atoning sacrifice and resurrection, Jesus directly confronts the deep-seated "mischief" of the human heart, offering true transformation, forgiveness, and eternal reconciliation with God, thereby accomplishing what no human leader, including Aaron, could ever achieve. His perfect obedience and sacrifice provide the ultimate answer to humanity's inherent bent towards evil, offering a path to righteousness and new life in Him (Romans 5:19).

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Exodus 32:21–29. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 9 verses
Passage under commentExodus 32:21–29
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Moses, having shown his just indignation against the sin of Israel by breaking the tables and burning the calf, now proceeds to reckon with the sinners and to call them to an account, herein acting as the representative of God, who is not only a holy God, and hates sin, but a just God, and is engaged in honour to punish it, Isa 59:18. Now,

I.He begins with Aaron, as God began with Adam, because he was the principal person, though not first in the transgression, but drawn into it. Observe here,

1.The just reproof Moses gives him, Exo 32:21. He does not order him to be cut-off, as those (Exo 32:27) that had been the ring-leaders in the sin. Note, A great deal of difference will be made between those that presumptuously rush into sin and those that through infirmity are surprised into it, between those that overtake the fault that flees from them and those that are overtaken in the fault they flee from. See Gal 6:1. Not but that Aaron deserved to be cut off for this sin, and would have been so if Moses had not interceded particularly for him, as appears Deu 9:20. And having prevailed with God for him, to save him from ruin, he here expostulates with him, to bring him to repentance. He puts Aaron upon considering,

(1.)What he had done to this people: Thou hast brought so great a sin upon them. The sin of idolatry is a great sin, so great a sin that the evil of it cannot be expressed; the people, as the first movers, might be said to bring the sin upon Aaron; but he being a magistrate, who should have suppressed it, and yet aiding and abetting it, might truly be said to bring it upon them, because he hardened their hearts and strengthened their hands in it. It is a shocking thing for governors to humour people in their sins, and give countenance to that to which they should be a terror. Observe, in general, Those who bring sin upon others, either by drawing them into it or encouraging them in it, do more mischief than they are aware of; we really hate those whom we either bring or suffer sin upon, Lev 19:17. Those that share in sin help to break their partners, and really ruin one another.

(2.)What moved him to it: What did this people unto thee? He takes it for granted that it must needs be something more than ordinary that prevailed with Aaron to do such a thing, thus insinuating an excuse for him, because he knew that his heart was upright: "What did they? Did they accost thee fairly, and wheedle thee into it; and durst thou displease thy God, to please the people? Did they overcome thee by importunity; and hadst thou so little resolution left as to yield to the stream of a popular clamour? Did they threaten to stone thee; and couldest not thou have opposed God's threatenings to theirs, and frightened them worse than they could frighten thee?" Note, We must never be drawn into sin by any thing that man can say or do to us, for it will not justify us to say that we were so drawn in. Men can but tempt us to sin; they cannot force us. Men can but frighten us; if we do not comply, they cannot hurt us.

2.The frivolous excuse Aaron makes for himself. We will hope that he testified his repentance for the sin afterwards better than he did now; for what he says here has little in it of the language of a penitent. If a just man fall, he shall rise again, but perhaps not quickly.

(1.)He deprecates the anger of Moses only, whereas he should have deprecated God's anger in the first place: Let not the anger of my Lord wax hot, Exo 32:22.

(2.)He lays all the fault upon the people: They are set on mischief, and they said, Make us gods. It is natural to us to endeavour thus to transfer our guilt; we have it in our kind, Adam and Eve did so; sin is a brat that nobody is willing to own. Aaron was now the chief magistrate and had power over the people, and yet pleads that the people overpowered him; he that had authority to restrain them, yet had so little resolution as to yield to them.

(3.)It is well if he did not intend a reflection upon Moses, as accessory to the sin, by staying so long on the mount, in repeating, without need, that invidious surmise of the people, As for this Moses, we know not what has become of him, Exo 32:23.

(4.)He extenuates and conceals his own share in the sin, as if he had only bidden them break off their gold that they had about them, intending to make a hasty assay for the present, and to try what he could make of the gold that was next hand: and childishly insinuates that when he cast the gold into the fire it came out, either by accident or by the magic art of some of the mixed multitude (as the Jewish writers dream), in this shape; but not a word of his graving and fashioning it, Exo 32:24. But Moses relates to all ages what he did (Exo 32:4), though he himself here would not own it. Note, He that covers his sin shall not prosper, for sooner or later it will be discovered. Well, this was all Aaron had to say for himself; and he had better have said nothing, for his defence did but aggravate his offence; and yet he is not only spared, but preferred; as sin did abound, grace did much more abound.

II.The people are next to be judged for this sin.

The approach of Moses soon spoiled their sport and turned their dancing into trembling. Those that hectored Aaron into a compliance with them in their sin durst not look Moses in the face, nor make the least opposition to the severity which he thought fit to use both against the idol and against the idolaters. Note, It is not impossible to make those sins which were committed with daring presumption appear contemptible, when the insolent perpetrators of them slink away overwhelmed in their own confusion. The king that sits upon the throne of judgment scatters away all evil with his eyes. Observe two things: -

1.How they were exposed to shame by their sin: The people were naked (Exo 32:25), not so much because they had some of them lost their ear-rings (that was inconsiderable), but because they had lost their integrity, and lay under the reproach of ingratitude to their best benefactor, and a treacherous revolt from their rightful Lord. It was a shame to them, and a perpetual blot, that they changed their glory into the similitude of an ox. Other nations boasted that they were true to their false gods; well may Israel blush for being false to the true God. Thus were they made naked, stripped of their ornaments, and exposed to contempt; stripped of their armour, and liable to insults. Thus our first parents, when they had sinned, became naked, to their shame. Note, Those that do dishonour to God really bring the greatest dishonour upon themselves: so Israel here did, and Moses was concerned to see it, though they themselves were not; he saw that they were naked.

2.The course that Moses took to roll away this reproach, not by concealing the sin, or putting any false colour upon it, but by punishing it, and so bearing a public testimony against it. Whenever it should be case in their teeth that they had made a calf in Horeb, they might have this to say, in answer to those that reproached them, that though it was true there were those that did so, yet justice was executed upon them. The government disallowed the sin, and suffered not the sinners to go unpunished. They did so, but they paid dearly for it. Thus (said God) thou shalt put the evil away, Deu 13:5. Observe here,

(1.)By whom vengeance was taken - by the children of Levi (Exo 32:26, Exo 32:28); not by the immediate hand of God himself, as on Nadab and Abihu, but by the sword of man, to teach them that idolatry was an iniquity to be punished by the judge, being a denial of the God that is above, Job 31:28; Deu 13:9. It was to be done by the sword of their own brethren, that the execution of justice might redound more to the honour of the nation. And, if they must fall now into the hands of man, better so than flee before their enemies. The innocent must be culled out to be the executioners of the guilty, that it might be the more effectual warning to themselves, that they did not the like another time; and the putting of them upon such an unpleasant service, and so much against the grain as this must needs be, to kill their next neighbours, was a punishment to them too for not appearing sooner to prevent the sin, and make head against it. The Levites particularly were employed in doing this execution; for, it should seem, there were more of them than of any other tribe that had kept themselves free from the contagion, which was the more laudable because Aaron, the head of their tribe, was so deeply concerned in it. Now here we are told,

[1.]How the Levites were called out to this service: Moses stood in the gate of the camp, the place of judgment; there he displayed a banner, as it were, because of the truth, to enlist soldiers for God. He proclaimed, Who is on the Lord's side? The idolaters had set up the golden calf for their standard, and now Moses set up his, in opposition to them. Now Moses clad himself with zeal as with a robe, and summoned all those to appear forthwith that were on God's side, against the golden calf. He does not proclaim, as Jehu, "Who is on my side (Kg2 9:32), to avenge the indignity done to me?" but, Who is on the Lord's side? It was God's cause that he espoused against the evil-doers, Psa 94:16. Note, First, There are two great interests on foot in the world, with the one or the other of which all the children of men are siding. The interest of sin and wickedness is the devil's interest, and all wicked people side with that interest; the interest of truth and holiness is God's interest, with which all godly people side; and it is a case that will not admit a neutrality. Secondly, It concerns us all to enquire whether we are on the Lord's side or not. Thirdly, Those who are on his side are comparatively but few, and sometimes seem fewer than really they are. Fourthly, God does sometimes call out those that are on his side to appear for him, as witnesses, as soldiers, as intercessors.

[2.]How they were commissioned for this service (Exo 32:27): Slay every man his brother, that is, "Slay all those that you know to have been active for the making and worshipping of the golden calf, though they were your own nearest relations, or dearest friends." The crime was committed publicly, the Levites saw who of their acquaintance were concerned in it, and therefore needed no other direction than their own knowledge whom to slay. And probably the greatest part of those that were guilty were known, and known to be so, by some or other of the Levites who were employed in the execution. Yet, it should seem, they were to slay those only whom they found abroad in the streets of the camp; for it might be hoped that those who had retired into their tents were ashamed of what they had done, and were upon their knees, repenting. Those are marked for ruin who persist in sin, and are not ashamed of the abominations they have committed, Jer 8:12. But how durst the Levites encounter so great a body, who probably were much enraged by the burning of their calf? It is easy to account for this; a sense of guilt disheartened the delinquents, and a divine commission animated the executioners. And one thing that put life into them was that Moses had said, Consecrate yourselves to day to the Lord, that he may bestow a blessing upon you, thereby intimating to them that they now stood fair for preferment and that, if they would but signalize themselves upon this occasion, it would be construed into such a consecration of themselves to God, and to his service, as would put upon their tribe a perpetual honour. Those that consecrate themselves to the Lord he will set apart for himself. Those that do the duty shall have the dignity; and, if we do signal services for God, he will bestow especial blessings upon us. There was a blessing designed for the tribe of Levi; now says Moses, "Consecrate yourselves to the Lord, that you may qualify yourselves to receive the blessing." The Levites were to assist in the offering of sacrifice to God; and now they must begin with the offering of these sacrifices to the honour of divine justice. Those that are to minister about holy things must be not only sincere and serious, but warm and zealous, bold and courageous, for God and godliness. Thus all Christians, but especially ministers, must forsake father and mother, and prefer the service of Christ and his interest far before their nearest and dearest relations; for if we love our relations better than Christ we are not worthy of him. See how this zeal of the Levites is applauded, Deu 33:9.

(2.)On whom vengeance is taken: There fell of the people that day about 3000 men, Exo 32:28. Probably these were but few, in comparison with the many that were guilty; but these were the men that headed the rebellion, and were therefore picked out, to be made examples of, for terror to all others. Those that in the morning were shouting and dancing before night were dying in their own blood; such a sudden change do the judgments of God sometimes make with sinners that are secure and jovial in their sin, as with Belshazzar by the hand-writing upon the wall. This is written for warning to us. Co1 10:7, Neither be you idolaters, as were some of them.

Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Exodus 32:22 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8