Skip to content

Joshua 13:13

“The Inheritance East of the Jordan”· Joshua 13:8–14Read in context
King James Version
Nevertheless the children of Israel expelled not the Geshurites, nor the Maachathites: but the Geshurites and the Maachathites dwell among the Israelites until this day.
KJV (with Strong's)
Nevertheless the children H1121 of Israel H3478 expelled H3423 not the Geshurites H1651, nor the Maachathites H4602: but the Geshurites H1650 and the Maachathites H4601 dwell H3427 among H7130 the Israelites H3478 until this day H3117.
Complete Jewish Bible
However, the people of Isra'el expelled neither the G'shuri nor the Ma'akhati, with the consequence that G'shur and Ma'akhat have lived among Isra'el to this day.
Berean Standard Bible
but the Israelites did not drive out the Geshurites or the Maacathites. So Geshur and Maacath dwell among the Israelites to this day.
American Standard Version
Nevertheless the children of Israel drove not out the Geshurites, nor the Maacathites: but Geshur and Maacath dwell in the midst of Israel unto this day.
World English Bible Messianic
Nevertheless the children of Israel didn’t drive out the Geshurites, nor the Maacathites: but Geshur and Maacath dwell in the midst of Israel to this day.
Geneva Bible (1599)
But the children of Israel expelled not the Geshurites nor the Maachathites: but the Geshurites and the Maachathites dwell among the Israelites euen vnto this day.
Young's Literal Translation
and the sons of Israel dispossessed not the Geshurite, and the Maachathite; and Geshur and Maachath dwell in the midst of Israel unto this day.
Douay-Rheims Bible
And the children of Israel would not destroy Gessuri and Machati and they have dwelt in the midst of Israel, until this present day.
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 6,168 of 31,102 · 19.8%

Study this verse

Summary

Joshua 13:13 serves as a profound and sobering parenthetical commentary within the meticulous account of Israel's tribal land allocations. It starkly reveals a critical failure of the Israelites to fully obey God's explicit command to dispossess the indigenous inhabitants of the Promised Land, specifically naming the Geshurites and Maachathites. This verse underscores the immediate and lasting consequences of incomplete obedience, highlighting a significant compromise that would reverberate through Israel's history, setting a precedent for future spiritual and national challenges.

Context

Literary Context

This verse is situated within Joshua chapter 13, which marks a crucial thematic shift in the Book of Joshua. Following the triumphant accounts of military conquest and initial victories in chapters 1-12, the narrative transitions to the detailed division of the land among the twelve tribes of Israel. Significantly, Joshua 13:1 opens with God's direct instruction to an aging Joshua, reminding him that "there remains yet very much land to be possessed." Amidst the otherwise administrative and geographical descriptions of the land east of the Jordan, allocated to Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh, verse 13 stands out as a stark, parenthetical note of Israel's failure to fully execute the divine mandate. It interrupts the meticulous cataloging, serving as an early, ominous warning sign of the spiritual compromises and persistent challenges that would plague Israel in the subsequent era of the Judges and beyond.

Historical & Cultural Context

The Geshurites and Maachathites were Aramean peoples who inhabited the region northeast of the Sea of Galilee, specifically in the fertile areas of Bashan and the Golan Heights. This territory bordered the land allocated to the half-tribe of Manasseh and Reuben. God had issued repeated and unequivocal commands to Israel to utterly destroy or drive out the indigenous populations of Canaan (e.g., Deuteronomy 7:2, Exodus 23:31-33). This was not an arbitrary act of cruelty but a necessary measure to preserve Israel's covenant purity and prevent the corruption of their worship through the idolatrous, immoral, and syncretistic practices inherent to Canaanite culture. Allowing these groups to remain, as Joshua 13:13 explicitly states, meant retaining a persistent source of temptation and spiritual compromise, a reality tragically borne out in the cycles of apostasy and judgment detailed in the Book of Judges.

Key Themes

Joshua 13:13 encapsulates several crucial theological and narrative themes that resonate throughout the biblical narrative. The most prominent is Incomplete Obedience, highlighting Israel's failure to fully carry out God's clear directives. This was not a minor oversight but a significant lapse with profound implications, demonstrating that partial obedience is, in God's eyes, fundamental disobedience. Closely related is the theme of Consequences of Compromise. The phrase "dwell among the Israelites until this day" indicates that this failure had lasting repercussions, establishing a precedent for future spiritual and moral decay, as seen in the repeated cycles of apostasy and judgment in Judges (e.g., Judges 2:2-3). Furthermore, the verse subtly touches upon the interplay between Divine Sovereignty and Human Responsibility. While God promised to give Israel the land and even fought battles for them, their full possession and enjoyment of the inheritance were contingent upon their active and faithful obedience. This verse underscores that human choices have real, tangible consequences within the framework of God's overarching plan for His people.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

expelled yârash' H3423

This primitive root fundamentally means "to occupy (by driving out previous tenants, and possessing in their place); by implication, to seize, to rob, to inherit." In the Hiphil stem, as used here (implied by the KJV "expelled"), it carries the causative meaning of "to cause to inherit," or more commonly in this context, "to dispossess," "to drive out," or "to cast out." The negative particle "not" (לֹא, lo) emphatically states Israel's failure to perform this active duty. This highlights that the Geshurites and Maachathites were not merely allowed to remain, but Israel failed to actively dispossess them, indicating a lack of resolve or commitment to God's command.

Geshurites Gᵉshûwrîy' H1651

This term is a patrial noun referring to the inhabitants of Geshur, a small Aramean district located east of the Jordan River. The root (H1650, Gᵉshûwr) means "bridge" or "to join." Their continued presence is significant, as Geshur later plays a role in the Davidic narrative, with King David's wife Maacah, the mother of Absalom, being the daughter of Talmai, king of Geshur (2 Samuel 3:3). Their persistent existence underscores the long-term impact of this initial failure to fully dispossess.

until this day yôwm' H3117

The word yôwm refers to a "day" or a "space of time defined by an associated term." The phrase "until this day" (עַד הַיּוֹם הַזֶּה, 'ad hayyom hazzeh) is a common biblical idiom found throughout the historical books, serving as an editorial note. It signifies that the situation described persisted from the time of the event up to the time the book was written or compiled. In this context, it emphasizes the enduring nature of Israel's failure and the ongoing presence of these unexpelled peoples, highlighting the lasting and generational consequences of their disobedience.

Verse Breakdown

"Nevertheless the children of Israel expelled not the Geshurites, nor the Maachathites"

The opening "Nevertheless" (אַךְ, 'akh) acts as a strong adversative conjunction, introducing a contrasting reality to the preceding descriptions of land distribution and divine promise. It immediately signals a deviation from God's ideal plan and covenant expectations. The explicit naming of "the children of Israel" places the responsibility squarely on the nation as a whole. Their failure to "expel" (dispossess) the Geshurites and Maachathites is stated as a direct act of omission, a neglect of their divinely appointed task to clear the land of pagan influence.

"but the Geshurites and the Maachathites dwell among the Israelites until this day"

This clause reveals the immediate and lasting consequence of the aforementioned failure. The conjunction "but" (וְ, ve) emphasizes the direct result of Israel's disobedience. The unexpelled groups did not merely remain in their own territories but "dwell among the Israelites," implying a level of integration or coexistence that was explicitly forbidden by God to prevent spiritual contamination and syncretism. The phrase "until this day" underscores the enduring nature of this compromise, indicating that the consequences of this early disobedience continued to manifest for generations, impacting Israel's spiritual and national identity.

Literary Devices

Joshua 13:13 employs several literary devices to underscore its profound significance. It functions as a Parenthetical Note or Digression, abruptly interrupting the otherwise administrative and geographical listing in Joshua 13 to highlight a critical spiritual failure. This sudden shift in tone draws immediate attention to the gravity of the statement. The verse also utilizes Contrast, setting the divine command for complete disinheritance against Israel's actual incomplete obedience. This stark juxtaposition emphasizes the severity of their lapse and the gap between God's ideal and human reality. The Repetition of "Geshurites, nor the Maachathites" reinforces the specific nature of the failure and the enduring identity of the unexpelled groups. Finally, the phrase "until this day" serves as a form of Foreshadowing, hinting at the long-term, negative consequences that will unfold throughout the subsequent historical narratives, particularly in the Book of Judges, where the presence of unexpelled nations consistently leads to Israel's spiritual decline, idolatry, and oppression.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Joshua 13:13 is a powerful theological statement about the nature of obedience and the perils of compromise. It reveals that God's commands are not mere suggestions but divine mandates, and that incomplete obedience is fundamentally disobedience in His eyes. The failure to dispossess the Geshurites and Maachathites, though seemingly minor in the grand scheme of conquest, represents a significant breach of covenant faithfulness. This compromise allowed pockets of pagan influence to remain within the Promised Land, serving as ongoing temptations to idolatry and moral corruption, which tragically materialized throughout Israel's history. It underscores the profound principle that spiritual purity requires decisive action against all forms of ungodliness, both internal and external, emphasizing that God desires wholehearted devotion, not just partial compliance.

Reflection and Application

Joshua 13:13 serves as a timeless and poignant warning against the insidious dangers of incomplete obedience and spiritual compromise in our own lives. Just as Israel was commanded to dispossess the pagan nations to preserve their covenant purity and prevent corruption, believers today are called to actively dispossess sin, worldly influences, and spiritual strongholds from their hearts and lives. This verse challenges us to critically examine areas where we might be practicing "partial obedience," knowingly or unknowingly tolerating "pockets" of unaddressed sin, unconfessed rebellion, or unholy habits, perhaps believing that a half-hearted surrender is sufficient. The enduring presence of the Geshurites and Maachathites among Israel vividly illustrates that leaving such areas unconquered inevitably leads to ongoing spiritual struggles, compromise, and a hindering of our full inheritance in Christ. True spiritual growth, freedom, and effectiveness require a thorough, uncompromising commitment to God's revealed will, understanding that God desires and deserves our wholehearted devotion, not just convenient compliance.

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what areas of my life might I be practicing "incomplete obedience," knowingly or unknowingly tolerating attitudes, habits, or influences that God has called me to dispossess?
  2. What are the potential long-term consequences of these unaddressed areas of compromise, both for my personal spiritual walk and for those around me whom I influence?
  3. What specific, decisive actions can I take today to "expel" or fully surrender these areas to God, trusting in His power to enable my obedience and transformation?
  4. How does the warning of Joshua 13:13 encourage me to pursue a more thorough and uncompromising commitment to God's holiness and His complete will in my daily life?

FAQ

Why was it so important for Israel to expel these groups, and not just live among them peacefully?

It was critically important for several theological and practical reasons, all rooted in God's unique covenant with Israel. The primary reason was to preserve Israel's spiritual purity and prevent them from falling into idolatry and the immoral, often horrific, practices of the Canaanite nations. God knew that if these groups remained, their pagan worship, child sacrifice, and sexual immorality would inevitably corrupt Israel, leading them away from the one true God. Deuteronomy 7:1-5 explicitly commands their expulsion to prevent Israel from being "snared" by their gods. Furthermore, the land itself was to be holy, a dwelling place for God's presence among His people, and the presence of unholy practices defiled it. Allowing these groups to remain was an act of direct disobedience that threatened Israel's unique identity as God's chosen people and their mission to be a light to the surrounding nations.

What happened to the Geshurites and Maachathites later in Israel's history?

Joshua 13:13 states that they "dwell among the Israelites until this day," indicating their continued presence for a significant period after the initial conquest. While they were not fully expelled, they likely existed as distinct, though sometimes integrated, communities. The Geshurites, for instance, are later mentioned in connection with King David's family; his wife Maacah, the mother of Absalom, was the daughter of Talmai, the king of Geshur (2 Samuel 3:3). This suggests that at least some Geshurite communities maintained their identity and even political structures, forming alliances or relationships with Israelite tribes or kings. Their continued presence, along with other unexpelled groups like the Jebusites in Jerusalem (Judges 1:21), contributed to the ongoing spiritual struggles, temptations to idolatry, and cycles of oppression that are vividly described throughout the Book of Judges and into the period of the monarchy.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Joshua 13:13, in its stark portrayal of Israel's incomplete obedience and its lasting consequences, powerfully foreshadows the profound need for a greater deliverer and a more perfect fulfillment of God's redemptive will. Israel's failure to fully "dispossess" the land's inhabitants highlights humanity's inherent inability to perfectly obey God's commands and achieve true spiritual purity through their own efforts. This points directly to Jesus Christ, who is the true and perfectly obedient Son. Unlike Israel, who failed to drive out their physical enemies, Christ decisively conquered and dispossessed humanity's ultimate spiritual enemies: sin, death, and the devil (Hebrews 2:14-15). Through His perfect life, atoning death, and glorious resurrection, Jesus accomplished what Israel could not. He not only provides the means for believers to overcome the "pockets of sin" in their own lives through the sanctifying power of the Holy Spirit (Romans 8:13), but He also secures for them a true and eternal inheritance, a spiritual "Promised Land" that is fully possessed not by human effort, but by grace through faith in Him (Ephesians 1:11-14). He is the faithful Joshua who leads His people to complete victory over all spiritual adversaries and into their full spiritual inheritance in the heavenly places.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Joshua 13:7–33. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 27 verses
Passage under commentJoshua 13:7–33
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Here we have, I. Orders given to Joshua to assign to each tribe its portion of this land, including that which was yet unsubdued, which must be brought into the lot, in a believing confidence that it should be conquered when Israel was multiplied so as to have occasion for it (Jos 13:7): Now divide this land. Joshua thought all must be conquered before any must be divided. "No," said, God, "there is as much conquered as will serve your turn for the present; divide this, and make your best of it, and wait for the remainder hereafter." Note, We must take the comfort of what we have, though we cannot compass all we would have. Observe,

1.The land must be divided among the several tribes, and they must not always live in common, as now they did. Which way soever a just property is acquired, it is the will of that God who has given the earth to the children of men that there should be such a thing, and that every man should know his own, and not invade that which is another's. The world must be governed, not by force, but right, by the law of equity, not of arms.

2.That it must be divided for an inheritance, though they got it by conquest.

(1.)The promise of it came to them as an inheritance from their fathers; the land of promise pertained to the children of promise, who were thus beloved for their fathers' sakes, and in performance of the covenant with them.

(2.)The possession of it was to be transmitted by them, as an inheritance to their children. Frequently, what is got by force is soon lost again; but Israel, having an incontestable title to this land by the divine grant, might see it hereby secured as an inheritance to their seed after them, and that God kept this mercy for thousands.

3.That Joshua must not divide it by his own will. Though he was a very wise, just, and good man, it must not be left to him to give what he pleased to each tribe; but he must do it by lot, which referred the matter wholly to God, and to his determination, for he it is that appoints the bounds of our habitation, and every man's judgment must proceed from him. But Joshua must preside in this affair, must manage this solemn appeal to Providence, and see that the lot was drawn fairly and without fraud, and that every tribe did acquiesce in it. The lot indeed causeth contention to cease, Pro 18:18. But, if upon this lot any controversy should arise, Joshua by his wisdom and authority must determine it, and prevent any ill consequences of it. Joshua must have the honour of dividing the land,

(1.)Because he had undergone the fatigue of conquering it: and when, through his hand, each tribe received its allotment, they would thereby be made the more sensible of their obligations to him. And what a pleasure must it needs be to a man of such a public spirit as Joshua was to see the people that were so dear to him eating of the labour of his hands!

(2.)That he might be herein a type of Christ, who has not only conquered for us the gates of hell, but has opened to us the gates of heaven, and, having purchased the eternal inheritance for all believers, will in due time put them all in possession of it.

II.An account is here given of the distribution of the land on the other side Jordan among the Reubenites, and Gadites, and half the tribe of Manasseh. Observe,

1.How this account is introduced. It comes in,

(1.)As the reason why this land within Jordan must be divided only to the nine tribes and a half, because the other two and a half were already provided for.

(2.)As a pattern to Joshua in the work he had now to do. He had seen Moses distribute that land, which would give him some aid in distributing this, and thence he might take his measure; only this was to be done by lot, but it should seem Moses did that himself, according to the wisdom given unto him.

(3.)As an inducement to Joshua to hasten the dividing of this land, that the nine tribes and a half might not be kept any longer than was necessary out of their possession, since their brethren of the two tribes and a half were so well settled in theirs; and God their common Father would not have such a difference made between his children.

2.The particulars of this account.

(1.)Here is a general description of the country that was given to the two tribes and a half, which Moses gave them, even as Moses gave them, Jos 13:8. The repetition implies a ratification of the grant by Joshua. Moses settled this matter, and, as Moses settled it, so shall it rest; Joshua will not, under any pretence whatsoever, go about to alter it. And a reason is intimated why he would not, because Moses was the servant of the Lord, and acted in this matter by secret direction from him and was faithful as a servant. Here we have,

[1.]The fixing of the boundaries of this country, by which they were divided from the neighbouring nations, Jos 13:9, etc. Israel must know their own and keep to it, and may not, under pretence of their being God's peculiar people, encroach upon their neighbours, and invade their rights and properties, to which they had a good and firm title by providence, though not, as Israel, a title by promise.

[2.]An exception of one part of this country from Israel's possession, though it was in their grant, namely, the Geshurites and the Maachathites, Jos 13:13. They had not leisure to reduce all the remote and obscure corners of the country in Moses's time, and afterwards they had no mind to it, being easy with what they had. Thus those who are not straitened in God's promises are yet straitened in their own faith, and prayers, and endeavours.

(2.)A very particular account of the inheritances of these two tribes and a half, how they were separated from each other, and what cites, with the towns, villages, and fields, commonly known and reputed to be appurtenances to them, belonged to each tribe. This is very fully and exactly set down in order that posterity might, in reading this history, be the more affected with the goodness of God to their ancestors, when they found what a large and fruitful country, and what abundance of great and famous cities, he put them in possession of (God's grants look best when we descend to the particulars); and also that the limits of every tribe being punctually set down in this authentic record disputes might be prevented, and such contests between the tribes as commonly happen where boundaries have not been adjusted nor this matter brought to a certainty. And we have reason to think that the register here prescribed and published of the lot of each tribe was of great use to Israel in after-ages, was often appealed to, and always acquiesced in, for the determining of meum and tuum - mine and thine.

[1.]We have here the lot of the tribe of Reuben, Jacob's first-born, who, though he had lost the dignity and power which pertained to the birthright, yet, it seems, had the advantage of being first served. Perhaps those of that tribe had an eye to this in desiring to be seated on that side Jordan, that, since they could not expect the benefit of the best lot, they might have the credit of the first. Observe, First, In the account of the lot of this tribe mention is made of the slaughter, 1. Of Sihon, king of the Amorites, who reigned in this country, and might have kept it and his life if he would have been neighbourly, and have suffered Israel to pass through his territories, but, by attempting to oppose them, justly brought ruin upon himself, Num 21:21, etc. 2. Of the princes of Midian, who were slain afterwards in another war (Num 31:8), and yet are here called dukes of Sihon, and are said to be smitten with him, because they were either tributaries to him, or, in his opposition to Israel, confederates with him, and hearty in his interests, and his fall made way for theirs not long after. 3. Of Balaam particularly, that would, if he could, have cursed Israel, and was soon after recompensed according to the wickedness of his endeavour (Psa 28:4), for he fell with those that set him on. This was recorded before (Num 31:8), and is here repeated, because the defeating of Balaam's purpose to curse Israel was the turning of that curse into a blessing, and was such an instance of the power and goodness of God as was fit to be had in everlasting remembrance. See Mic 6:5. Secondly, Within the lot of this tribe was that Mount Pisgah from the top of which Moses took his view of the earthly Canaan and his flight to the heavenly. And not far off thence Elijah was when he was fetched up to heaven in a chariot of fire. The separation of this tribe from the rest, by the river Jordan, was that which Deborah lamented; and the preference they gave to their private interests above the public was what she censured, Jdg 5:15, Jdg 5:16. In this tribe lay Heshbon and Sibmah, famed for their fruitful fields and vineyards. See Isa 16:8, Isa 16:9; Jer 48:32. This tribe, with that of Gad, was sorely shaken by Hazael king of Syria (Kg2 10:33), and afterwards dislodged and carried into captivity, twenty years before the general captivity of the ten tribes by the king of Assyria, Ch1 5:26.

[2.]The lot of the tribe of Gad, Jos 13:24-28. This lay north of Reuben's lot; the country of Gilead lay in this tribe, so famous for its balm that it is thought strange indeed if there be no balm in Gilead, and the cities of Jabesh-Gilead and Ramoth-Gilead which we often read of in scripture. Succoth and Penuel, which we read of in the story of Gideon, were in this tribe; and that forest which is called the wood of Ephraim (from the slaughter Jephthah made there of the Ephraimites), in which Absalom's rebellious army was beaten, while his father David lay at Mahanaim, one of the frontier-cities of this tribe, Jos 13:26. Sharon, famous for roses, was in this tribe. And within the limits of this tribe lived those Gadarenes that loved their swine better than their Saviour, fitter to be called Girgashites than Israelites.

[3.]The lot of the half-tribe of Manasseh, Jos 13:29-31. Bashan, the kingdom of Og, was in this allotment, famous for the best timber, witness the oaks of Bashan - and the best breed of cattle, witness the bulls and rams of Bashan. This tribe lay north of Gad, reached to Mount Hermon, and had in it part of Gilead. Mispeh was in this half-tribe, and Jephthah was one of its ornaments; so was Elijah, for in this tribe was Thisbe, whence he is called the Tishbite; and Jair was another. In the edge of the tribe stood Chorazin, honoured with Christ's wondrous works, but ruined by his righteous woe for not improving them.

[4.]Twice in this chapter it is taken notice of that to the tribe of Levi Moses gave no inheritance (Jos 13:14, Jos 13:33), for so God had appointed, Num 18:20. If they had been appointed to a lot entire by themselves, Moses would have served them first, not because it was his own tribe, but because it was God's; but they must be provided for in another manner; their habitations must be scattered in all the tribes, and their maintenance brought out of all the tribes, and God himself was the portion both of their inheritance and of their cup, Deu 10:9; Deu 18:2.

Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Joshua 13:13 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8