- English
- King James KJV
- Complete Jewish CJB
- World English WEBM
- Berean Standard BSB
- American Standard ASV
- Geneva GNV
- Young's Literal YLT
- Douay-Rheims DRC
- International
- Shqip ALB
- العربية SVD
- বাংলা BN-IRV
- မြန်မာ Judson
- 简体文 CUV-S
- 繁體中文 CUV-T
- Čeština BKR
- Nederlands STVE
- Français LSG
- Deutsch SCH
- Ελληνικά Vamvas
- ગુજરાતી GU-IRV
- Hausa HCB
- עברית Hebrew
- हिन्दी HCV
- Magyar KAROLI
- Bahasa Indonesia INDO-TB
- Italiano Diodati
- 日本語 Kougo
- 한국어 Korean
- മലയാളം MAL
- मराठी MRCV
- Norsk DNB
- فارسی OPV
- Polski BG
- Português Almeida
- Română Cornilescu
- Русский Synodal
- Español RVG
- Kiswahili Neno
- Svenska SV1917
- Tagalog TAG-ADB
- தமிழ் TCV
- తెలుగు TSA
- ภาษาไทย THAI-KJV
- Українська Ohienko
- Tiếng Việt CADMAN
- Yorùbá YCB
See on the biblical-era map


Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Genesis 9:18–23. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Here is, I. Noah's family and employment. The names of his sons are again mentioned (Gen 9:18, Gen 9:19) as those from whom the whole earth was overspread, by which it appears that Noah, after the flood, had no more children: all the world came from these three. Note, God, when he pleases, can make a little one to become a thousand, and greatly increase the latter end of those whose beginning was small. Such are the power and efficacy of a divine blessing. The business Noah applied himself to was that of a husbandman, Heb. a man of the earth, that is, a man dealing in the earth, that kept ground in his hand, and occupied it. We are all naturally men of the earth, made of it, living on it, and hastening to it: many are sinfully so, addicted to earthly things. Noah was by his calling led to trade in the fruits of the earth. He began to be a husbandman, that is, some time after his departure out of the ark, he returned to his old employment, from which he had been diverted by the building of the ark first, and probably afterwards by the building of a house on dry land for himself and family. For this good while he had been a carpenter, but now he began again to be a husbandman. Observe, Though Noah was a great man and a good man, an old man and a rich man, a man greatly favoured by heaven and honoured on earth, yet he would not live an idle life, nor think the husbandman's calling below him. Note, Though God by his providence may take us off from our callings for a time, yet when the occasion is over we ought with humility and industry to apply ourselves to them again, and, in the calling wherein we are called, faithfully to abide with God, Co1 7:24.
II.Noah's sin and shame:
He planted a vineyard; and, when he had gathered his vintage, probably he appointed a day of mirth and feasting in his family, and had his sons and their children with him, to rejoice with him in the increase of his house as well as in the increase of his vineyard; and we may suppose he prefaced his feast with a sacrifice to the honour of God. If this was omitted, it was just with God to leave him to himself, that he who did not begin with God might end with the beasts; but we charitably hope that it was not: and perhaps he appointed this feast with a design, at the close of it, to bless his sons, as Isaac, Gen 27:3, Gen 27:4, That I may eat, and that my soul may bless thee. At this feast he drank of the wine; for who planteth a vineyard and eateth not of the fruit of it? But he drank too liberally, more than his head at this age would bear, for he was drunk. We have reason to think he was never drunk before nor after; observe how he came now to be overtaken in this fault. It was his sin, and a great sin, so much the worse for its being so soon after a great deliverance; but God left him to himself, as he did Hezekiah (Ch2 32:31), and has left this miscarriage of his upon record, to teach us,
1.That the fairest copy that ever mere man wrote since the fall had its blots and false strokes. It was said of Noah that he was perfect in his generations (Gen 6:9), but this shows that it is meant of sincerity, not a sinless perfection.
2.That sometimes those who, with watchfulness and resolution, have, by the grace of God, kept their integrity in the midst of temptation, have, through security, and carelessness, and neglect of the grace of God, been surprised into sin, when the hour of temptation has been over. Noah, who had kept sober in drunken company, is now drunk in sober company. Let him that thinks he stands take heed.
3.That we have need to be very careful, when we use God's good creatures plentifully, lest we use them to excess. Christ's disciples must take heed lest at any time their hearts be overcharged, Luk 21:34. Now the consequence of Noah's sin was shame. He was uncovered within his tent, made naked to his shame, as Adam when he had eaten forbidden fruit. Yet Adam sought concealment; Noah is so destitute of thought and reason that he seeks no covering. This was a fruit of the vine that Noah did not think of. Observe here the great evil of the sin of drunkenness.
(1.)It discovers men. What infirmities they have, they betray when they are drunk, and what secrets they are entrusted with are then easily got out of them. Drunken porters keep open gates.
(2.)It disgraces men, and exposes them to contempt. As it shows them, so it shames them. Men say and do that when drunk which when they are sober they would blush at the thoughts of, Hab 2:15, Hab 2:16.
III.Ham's impudence and impiety:
He saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren, Gen 9:22. To see it accidentally and involuntarily would not have been a crime; but,
1.He pleased himself with the sight, as the Edomites looked upon the day of their brother (Oba 1:12), pleased, and insulting. Perhaps Ham had sometimes been himself drunk, and reproved for it by his good father, whom he was therefore pleased to see thus overcome. Note, It is common for those who walk in false ways themselves to rejoice at the false steps which they sometimes see others make. But charity rejoices not in iniquity, nor can true penitents that are sorry for their own sins rejoice in the sins of others.
2.He told his two brethren without (in the street, as the word is), in a scornful deriding manner, that his father might seem vile unto them. It is very wrong,
(1.)To make a jest of sin (Pro 14:9), and to be puffed up with that for which we should rather mourn, Co1 5:2. And,
(2.)To publish the faults of any, especially of parents, whom it is our duty to honour. Noah was not only a good man, but had been a good father to him; and this was a most base disingenuous requital to him for his tenderness. Ham is here called the father of Canaan, which intimates that he who was himself a father should have been more respectful to him that was his father.
IV.The pious care of Shem and Japheth to cover their poor father's shame, Gen 9:23.
They not only would not see it themselves, but provided that no one else might see it, herein setting us an example of charity with reference to other men's sin and shame; we must not only not say, A confederacy, with those that proclaim it, but we must be careful to conceal it, or at least to make the best of it, be doing as we would be done by.
1.There is a mantle of love to be thrown over the faults of all, Pe1 4:8.
2.Besides this, there is a robe of reverence to be thrown over the faults of parents and other superiors.
Historical interpretation
Four Centuries of Reception
9 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Now the three sons of Noah were Shem, Ham and Japheth, from whom again the race was multiplied: for these were the beginning of mankind after the flood. Now of these one fell under a curse, and the two (others) inherited a blessing by reason of their works. For the younger of them, who was called Ham, having mocked his father, and having been condemned of the sin of impiety because of his outrage and unrighteousness against his father, received a curse; and all the posterity that came of him he involved in the curse; whence it came about that his whole race after him were accursed, and in sins they increased and multiplied. But Shem and Japheth, his brothers, because of their piety towards their father obtained a blessing. Now the curse of Ham, wherewith his father Noah cursed him, is this: Cursed be Ham the child; a servant shall he be unto his brethren. This having come upon his race, he begat many descendants upon the earth, (even) for fourteen generations, growing up in a wild condition; and then his race was cut off by God, being delivered up to judgment. For the Canaanites and Hittites and Peresites and Hivites and Amorites and Jebusites and Gergasites and Sodomites, the Arabians also and the dwellers in Phœnicia, all the Egyptians and the Libyans, are of the posterity of Ham, who have fallen under the curse; for the curse is of long duration over the ungodly.
The chaste son could not endure looking upon the immodest nakedness of a good man; chastity covered over what drunkenness had exposed in a transgression committed in ignorance but manifest to all.
That is why the drunkenness of Noah also has been described, so that we may guard against drunkenness as much as possible, with the picture of such a fall clearly described before our eyes in Scripture. That is why, too, the Lord blessed those who covered the shame of his drunkenness. Scripture, summing everything up in one succinct verse, has said, “Wine is sufficient for a man well taught, and upon his bed, he shall rest.”
When Christ says, “I am the true vine,” the blood of Christ is assuredly not water but wine. We are redeemed and made alive by his blood. But in the cup it is not wine as such that redeems but his blood. This is declared by the sacrament and testimony of all the Scriptures. For we find this even in Genesis also, in respect of the sacrament prefigured in Noah. That he drank wine was to them a precursor and figure of the Lord’s passion. Noah was made drunk by this wine, was made naked in his household, was lying down with his thighs naked and exposed, and the nakedness of the father was observed by his second son and was told abroad but was covered by two, the eldest and the youngest, and other matters which it is not necessary to follow out. It is enough for us simply to embrace the understanding that Noah set forth a type of the future truth. Noah did not drink water but wine and thus expressed in advance the figure of the passion of the Lord.
Noah’s drunkenness was not from an excess of wine but because it had been a long time since he had drunk any wine. In the ark he had drunk no wine. Although all flesh was going to perish, Noah was not permitted to bring any wine onto the ark. During the year after the flood Noah did not drink any wine. In that first year after he left the ark, he did not plant a vineyard, for he came out of the ark on the twenty-seventh of Iyor, the time when the fruit should be starting to mature and not the time for planting a vineyard. Therefore, seeing that it was in the third year that he planted the vineyard from the grape stones that he brought with him on the ark and that it was three or even four years before they would have become a productive vineyard, there were then at least six years during which the just one had not tasted any wine.
Perhaps, on the other hand, someone might say, “Why was vine dressing, source of such terrible wickedness, introduced into life?” Do not idly blurt out what comes into your head, O man: vine dressing is not wicked nor is wine evil—rather, it is use of them in excess. You see, dreadful sins arise not from wine as such but from intemperate attitudes of human depravity that undermine the benefit that should naturally come from it. The reason that now after the deluge he shows you the use of wine is that you may learn that before using wine the human race had to come to grief from it. Before wine had even appeared, human history gave evidence of the extremity of sinfulness and unbridled licentiousness. This was intended to teach you that when you see the way wine is used, you will not attribute it all to wine as such but to depraved human intention bent on evil. Consider especially where wine has proved useful, and tremble, O man. For wine is used in good things by which our salvation is made real. Those who have an insight into spiritual realities understand this saying.
After the deluge Noah drank and became drunk in his own house, and his thighs were uncovered and he was exposed in his nakedness. The elder brother came along and laughed; the younger, however, covered him up. All this is said in type of the Savior, for on the cross he had drunk of the passion: “Father, if it is possible, let this cup pass away from me.” He drank and was inebriated, and his thighs were laid bare—the dishonor of the cross. The older brothers, the Jews, came along and laughed; the younger, the Gentiles, covered up his ignominy.
Why was Noah not blamed for falling into drunkenness? His falling was not due to intemperance but inexperience. For he was the first man to press the fruit of the vine and was ignorant not only of the power of the drink but also of the kind of change it had undergone. Because it ought to be mixed first before being drunk, he suffered drowsiness. There was nothing new about the fact that he was naked. For even now some people sleep naked, sleep having taken away their consciousness. The drunkenness, added to sleep, makes easier a defense of his nakedness.
“Woe to you that demand strong drink as soon as they rise in the morning, and linger into the night while wine inflames them!” Noah drank wine and fell into a drunken stupor and became naked in the more shameful part of his body so that you may know that the mind of man is so confounded by wine and the reason of the human mind is made so dull that it does not have concern even for itself, much less for God.… When Lot was soused with wine, he committed incest with his daughters and did not know his mistake; from that passionate union came the Moabites and the Ammonites.
Continue studying Genesis 9:19 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Genesis 9:19 serves as a pivotal genealogical statement, concisely identifying Noah's three sons—Shem, Ham, and Japheth—as the sole progenitors of all post-Flood humanity, from whom the entire earth was subsequently repopulated and diversified. This verse establishes the foundational premise for the global spread of humankind after the catastrophic deluge.
Context
Literary Context
This verse immediately follows God's establishment of His unconditional covenant with Noah and all living creatures, marked by the rainbow as a sign that He would never again destroy all life with a flood (Genesis 9:8-17). Having survived the global deluge in the ark, Noah and his family are now positioned as the sole remnant of humanity. Genesis 9:19 acts as a crucial transition point, bridging the narrative of the Flood's conclusion with the subsequent unfolding of human history, particularly the repopulation and diversification of the earth's inhabitants. It sets the genealogical stage for the "Table of Nations" in Genesis 10, which elaborates on the descendants of these three sons.
Historical & Cultural Context
In the ancient Near East, genealogical records were of paramount importance, serving to establish identity, inheritance, and tribal or national origins. Following a cataclysmic event like the Flood, the re-establishment of human civilization hinged entirely on Noah's family. The divine mandate given to Noah—to "be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth" (Genesis 9:1)—was a direct echo of the original creation mandate given to Adam and Eve (Genesis 1:28). This verse, therefore, places Noah's family at the very genesis of post-Flood humanity, emphasizing their unique role as the ancestral source for all future peoples. The cultural understanding of family lines as the basis for national identity is deeply embedded here.
Key Themes
Genesis 9:19 contributes significantly to several overarching themes in the book of Genesis. Firstly, it underscores the theme of Universal Ancestry, affirming that all humanity, regardless of race or nation, shares a common origin from Noah's family, thereby establishing a fundamental unity among all peoples. Secondly, it highlights the Continuity of God's Plan for humanity and the earth, demonstrating His faithfulness in preserving a remnant and reiterating the creation mandate for repopulation. Thirdly, it sets the stage for the theme of Human Diversification and Dispersion, foreshadowing the subsequent narratives of the "Table of Nations" in Genesis 10 and the dispersion at the Tower of Babel in Genesis 11, where the descendants of Noah's three sons spread across the globe, forming distinct nations and languages.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This term denotes a male offspring, but in a broader sense, it signifies a builder of the family name, encompassing descendants, nations, and even qualities. Here, it specifically refers to Noah's direct male children—Shem, Ham, and Japheth—who are identified as the foundational progenitors of all subsequent human lineage, emphasizing their role in rebuilding and extending the human family after the Flood.
This word refers to the earth at large, or partitively, a specific land or country. In the context of "the whole earth overspread," it strongly implies a global scope, indicating that the descendants of Noah's sons would eventually populate every region of the planet, not just a localized area. This reinforces the universal nature of the Flood and the subsequent repopulation.
This primitive root means "to dash to pieces, or scatter." In this passive form, it conveys the idea of being dispersed, broken up, or spread abroad. This is not merely a passive filling of space but an active, dynamic process of scattering and populating diverse regions, which accurately foreshadows the detailed account of the "Table of Nations" and the dispersion at Babel in later chapters.
Verse Breakdown
"These [are] the three sons of Noah:"
This opening clause serves as a direct and definitive genealogical statement. It identifies the specific individuals—Shem, Ham, and Japheth—who are central to the post-Flood narrative. The number "three" is significant, emphasizing the limited and singular source from which all future humanity would spring, highlighting God's preservation of a small remnant.
"and of them was the whole earth overspread."
This second clause declares the comprehensive outcome of Noah's lineage. The phrase "the whole earth" underscores the universal scope of the repopulation, implying that every corner of the globe would eventually be inhabited by their descendants. The verb "overspread" (Hebrew nâphats) conveys a sense of active dispersion and scattering, indicating that humanity would not remain confined to one location but would spread out and populate diverse regions, fulfilling the divine mandate to "fill the earth."
Literary Devices
Genesis 9:19, though brief, employs several significant literary devices. Its Conciseness or Brevity belies its immense theological and genealogical weight, delivering a foundational truth about human origins in a remarkably compact form. The verse functions as a crucial Genealogical Marker, serving as a bridge between the pre-Flood world and the subsequent development of nations, setting the stage for the detailed "Table of Nations" in Genesis 10. Furthermore, it utilizes Foreshadowing, hinting at the future dispersion and diversification of humanity that will be explicitly detailed in the subsequent chapters, particularly the events at Babel in Genesis 11. The phrase "the whole earth overspread" also implies a Totality or Universality, emphasizing the comprehensive nature of the repopulation from this single family unit.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Genesis 9:19 is profoundly significant for its theological implications, primarily establishing the unified ancestry of all post-Flood humanity. It asserts that every people group, nation, and tongue ultimately traces its lineage back to Noah's three sons. This common origin underscores the inherent dignity and shared humanity of all individuals, challenging any notion of racial superiority or division based on ethnicity. It powerfully demonstrates God's sovereign plan for the earth's repopulation, fulfilling the divine command given first in creation and then reiterated to Noah, ensuring the continuity of human life and the unfolding of His redemptive purposes.
Reflection and Application
Genesis 9:19 offers a profound truth about human origins that holds immense relevance for our understanding of ourselves and our place in the world. It unequivocally declares that all humanity, without exception, descends from a single family—Noah's. This shared ancestry should foster a deep sense of humility and interconnectedness, reminding us that despite our diverse cultures, languages, and appearances, we are all part of one human family. This biblical truth serves as a powerful antidote to racism, prejudice, and tribalism, calling us to recognize the inherent dignity and value of every individual as a fellow descendant of Noah, and ultimately, a creature made in God's image. Our common origin compels us to pursue unity, reconciliation, and mutual respect, reflecting the divine design for a populated and harmonious earth.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
How could the entire earth be repopulated from only three sons and their wives?
The phrase "the whole earth overspread" signifies the eventual, not immediate, global dispersal and multiplication of humanity. Over centuries and millennia, through successive generations, the descendants of Shem, Ham, and Japheth would multiply exponentially and migrate across continents, fulfilling the divine mandate to "fill the earth" (Genesis 9:1). This process is further elaborated in the genealogical records of Genesis 10 and the account of the dispersion at Babel in Genesis 11, which describes how different language groups and nations emerged and spread out from a common point.
Does "the whole earth" in this verse imply a global flood?
While Genesis 9:19 specifically refers to the repopulation after the flood, the phrase "the whole earth overspread" (Hebrew naphatz) implies a universal scope for the subsequent human population. This aligns seamlessly with the preceding narrative of a global deluge, where the floodwaters covered "all the high hills that were under the whole heaven" (Genesis 7:19). The necessity of repopulating the "whole earth" from a single surviving family unit strongly supports the understanding that the previous destruction was comprehensive and universal, requiring a global re-establishment of humanity.
Why are Noah's sons specifically mentioned here, and what is their significance?
The specific mention of Noah's three sons—Shem, Ham, and Japheth—is crucial for establishing the genealogical bridge between the pre-Flood world and all subsequent humanity. They are the designated patriarchs from whom all nations would descend. This verse sets the foundational premise for the "Table of Nations" in Genesis 10, which meticulously traces the origins of various peoples and cultures back to these three individuals. Their mention emphasizes the shared ancestry of all mankind and the singular point of origin for the diverse human family.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
While Genesis 9:19 details the physical repopulation of the earth through Noah's three sons, establishing the common ancestry of all humanity, it implicitly points to a deeper, spiritual unity found ultimately in Christ. The divisions and dispersions that arose from Noah's lineage, particularly after Babel, are ultimately overcome in the person and work of Jesus. As the "last Adam" and the "second man" (1 Corinthians 15:45-47), Jesus inaugurates a new humanity, transcending all racial, ethnic, and national boundaries. In Him, the walls of division are broken down, and a new spiritual family is formed, uniting those from "every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people" (Revelation 7:9) into one body (Ephesians 2:14-16). The physical spreading of humanity from Noah's sons foreshadows the spiritual spreading of the gospel to all peoples, bringing a diverse multitude into a unified fellowship under the headship of Christ, where there is "neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus" (Galatians 3:28).