Skip to content

1 Corinthians 5:2

“Judging Immorality in the Church”1 Corinthians 5:1–5

King James Version
And ye are puffed up, and have not rather mourned, that he that hath done this deed might be taken away from among you.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
And G2532 ye G5210 are G2075 puffed up G5448, and G2532 have G3996 not G3780 rather G3123 mourned G3996, that G2443 he that hath done G4160 this G5124 deed G2041 might be taken away G1808 from G1537 among G3319 you G5216.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
And you are proud! Shouldn’t you rather have been stricken with grief and have removed from your fellowship the man who did this?

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
And ye are puffed up, and did not rather mourn, that he that had done this deed might be taken away from among you.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
You are puffed up, and didn’t rather mourn, that he who had done this deed might be removed from among you.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
And ye are puffed vp and haue not rather sorowed, that he which hath done this deede, might be put from among you.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
and ye are having been puffed up, and did not rather mourn, that he may be removed out of the midst of you who did this work,

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
18 Greek words
  1. καὶkaiAndG2532CONJConjunction
  2. ὑμεῖςhumeisyou yourselvesG4771P-2NPPersonal pronoun Nominative 2nd Plural
  3. πεφυσιωμένοιpephusiōmenoipuffed upG5448V-RPP-NPMVerb Perfect Passive Participle Nominative Plural Masculine
  4. ἐστὲesteareG1510V-PAI-2PVerb Present Active Indicative 2nd Plural
  5. καὶkaiandG2532CONJConjunction
  6. οὐχὶouchinotG3780PRT-NNegative Particle Negative
  7. μᾶλλονmallonratherG3123ADVAdverb
  8. ἐπενθήσατεepenthēsatemournedG3996V-AAI-2PVerb Aorist Active Indicative 2nd Plural
  9. ἵναinaso thatG2443CONJConjunction
  10. ἀρθῇarthēamay be takenG142V-APS-3SVerb Aorist Passive Subjunctive 3rd Singular
  11. ἐκekout ofG1537PREPPreposition
  12. μέσουmesoumidstG3319A-GSNAdjective Genitive Singular Neuter
  13. ὑμῶνhumōnof youG4771P-2GPPersonal pronoun Genitive 2nd Plural
  14. ὁhothe [one]G3588T-NSMDefinite article Nominative Singular Masculine
  15. τὸtotheG3588T-ASNDefinite article Accusative Singular Neuter
  16. ἔργονergondeedG2041N-ASNNoun Accusative Singular Neuter
  17. τοῦτοtoutothisG3778D-ASNDemonstrative pronoun Accusative Singular Neuter
  18. πράξας;praxashaving performed?G4238V-AAP-NSMVerb Aorist Active Participle Nominative Singular Masculine
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
In the KJVVerse 28,457 of 31,102 · 91.5%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

The church was proud when it should have grieved over this sin, and its grief should have led it to remove the man from the fellowship.

“And ye are puffed up,”

Paul’s rebuke falls on the church’s attitude as much as on the man’s deed.

“and have not rather mourned,”

Grief over sin, of the kind people feel at a death, was the right response.

“that he that hath done this deed might be taken away from among you.”

The mourning was meant to lead to action, the removal of the man from their fellowship.

Passage study1 Corinthians 5:1–5

Paul Judges a Sin the Church Had Tolerated

1It is reported commonly that there is fornication among you, and such fornication as is not so much as named among the Gentiles, that one should have his father’s wife. 2And ye are puffed up, and have not rather mourned, that he that hath done this deed might be taken away from among you. 3For I verily, as absent in body, but present in spirit, have judged already, as though I were present, concerning him that hath so done this deed, 4In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, when ye are gathered together, and my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ, 5To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.

Summary

Word had reached Paul that a man in the church at Corinth was living with his father’s wife, a sin that even the pagans around them would not speak of, and the church had let it stand. In these five verses Paul rebukes them for being proud when they should have mourned, gives his own judgment on the man though he is far away, and tells them to meet in the name and with the power of the Lord Jesus and deliver the man unto Satan. The aim of that severe act is “that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.” The passage shows that God calls his people to be holy as he is holy, and that the discipline of the church, even at its sternest, is meant for the sinner’s salvation.

A sin even the Gentiles would not name

Chapter 5 turns from the divisions and pride Paul has addressed in chapters 1 to 4 to a single grave sin. He has already told the Corinthians that they are God’s temple, and that the temple of God is holy (1 Corinthians 3:16–17). Now he brings that truth to bear on a man in their own fellowship, and his instructions run on to the end of the chapter (1 Corinthians 5:6–13).

“It is reported commonly” tells us the matter was out in the open. The word behind “commonly”, hólōs, stresses that this was a widely known fact in Corinth, something people talked about openly. The sin is porneía, “fornication”, the broad word for every kind of sexual immorality, from prostitution to adultery, and here incest. It covers any sexual relationship outside the marriage of a man and a woman, and Paul uses it twice in one sentence.

Corinth was a wealthy, busy port city in Greece, full of trade and of temples, and known for its immorality. It had a temple of Aphrodite where sacred prostitution was practised, and “to Corinthianize” became a byword for sexual sin. The church there, made up of Jewish and Gentile converts, lived in the middle of all this. Yet Paul says this sin “is not so much as named among the Gentiles.” The word éthnos means a nation or people, and in an extended sense the Gentiles, the nations outside Israel. Pagan society had its own vices, and it still held this one in horror. Roman law forbade it, and common custom condemned it. So the church, called to be set apart for Christ, was putting up with what the pagan city around it would not, and the disgrace fell on the name of Christ among unbelievers.

What does “his father’s wife” mean?

“His father’s wife” means the man’s stepmother. The word gynḗ means woman or wife, and Paul’s wording points to a wife of the man’s father who was other than his own mother. The verse leaves open whether the father had died or had divorced her. She was his father’s wife, current or former. The law of Moses forbids this relationship in plain words, calling it the uncovering of the father’s nakedness (Leviticus 18:8) and saying, “A man shall not take his father’s wife” (Deuteronomy 22:30). Paul’s verb “have” is échō, to have, hold or possess, the ordinary way of speaking of a man keeping a woman as his own, and here it describes a relationship that was still going on.

Proud when they should have mourned

“And ye are puffed up.” The verb physióō means to inflate, and figuratively to make proud. Paul comes back to it again and again in this letter. He warns that none of them be “puffed up for one against another” (1 Corinthians 4:6), and he says that “knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth” (1 Corinthians 8:1). The picture is of something swollen, large on the outside and empty within. Their pride may have come from a sense of spiritual superiority, as if their freedom in Christ or their gifts let them tolerate what others condemned, or they may simply have been too proud to admit that anything was wrong. Either way, the pride kept them from seeing how serious the sin was.

What they should have done is mourn. The verb penthéō means to grieve, mourn or wail, the word for sorrow at a death or a great loss. Paul expected the church to grieve over a sin that offended God, defiled their fellowship and put the man himself in danger. Humble sorrow over sin is the mark of a mature church, and their pride showed how immature they still were.

That mourning was to lead somewhere: “that he that hath done this deed might be taken away from among you.” The verb exaírō means to lift up, lift off or remove, a general word for removal of many kinds, and in this chapter it is applied to putting a wicked man out of the church. The whole church is responsible here. Sin among its members is the business of all of them, and the failure to act was a failure of the whole fellowship. Paul goes on to explain why with the picture of leaven, which spreads through the whole lump, and with Christ our passover, sacrificed for us (1 Corinthians 5:6–8).

Paul’s verdict from far away

Paul is far from Corinth, and he gives his verdict anyway: “For I verily, as absent in body, but present in spirit, have judged already.” The verb krínō means to distinguish, to decide in the mind or as a judge, and by implication to try or condemn. Paul puts it in the perfect tense, kekrika, a decision completed and still standing, and he adds ḗdē, “already”, a word of time meaning now, by this time, ahead of the church’s meeting. His mind is made up, and the church’s task is to carry out the judgment he has reached. “I verily” makes it personal. Paul himself, as an apostle, stands behind this verdict. It concerns “him that hath so done this deed”, the one man and the sin the church had allowed to go on.

Paul’s authority came from Christ, who is “the head of the body, the church” (Colossians 1:18) and to whom the Father “hath committed all judgment” (John 5:22). Paul uses the same authority when he warns this church in his second letter that if he comes again he will not spare (2 Corinthians 13:2–3), and he says the Lord gave it to him for building them up (2 Corinthians 10:8).

How could Paul be present in spirit?

Paul means that his mind, his will and his apostolic authority were fully engaged with Corinth while his body was elsewhere. The word for spirit is pneûma, breath or wind and, figuratively, a spirit, here Paul’s own. “Present” is páreimi, to be there. Guided by the Holy Spirit, he understood the situation and judged it as surely as if he were standing among them. He writes to the Colossians in the same way, saying that though he is absent in the flesh he is with them in the spirit, rejoicing to see their order (Colossians 2:5). The bond Paul describes is the real bond of the body of Christ, and it holds across any distance.

Gathered in the name and with the power of the Lord Jesus

Verse 4 tells how the judgment is to be carried out. The whole church is to meet, “when ye are gathered together.” The early church gathered, often in homes, for worship, teaching and decisions made together, and an act this solemn belonged to the whole assembly. The church is one body, where what touches one member touches all (1 Corinthians 12).

They meet “in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.” The word ónoma, “name”, carries a person’s authority and character. To act in his name is to act by his authority and as his representatives, with his backing, as Peter healed the lame man with the words “In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth rise up and walk” (Acts 3:6). Paul’s spirit is with them, joining his apostolic verdict to their action. And they act “with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ.” The word dýnamis means force or power, often miraculous power, and here it is Christ’s own power that makes the church’s act effective. Christ is named twice in the verse, because the authority and the power are both his.

Jesus gave his church this authority when he spoke of binding and loosing, and promised to be in the midst where two or three are gathered in his name (Matthew 18:18–20). He has “all power ... in heaven and in earth” (Matthew 28:18), he is head over all things to the church, which is his body (Ephesians 1:22–23), and he is with his people always (Matthew 28:20) by the Comforter, the Spirit who abides with them (John 14:16–17). So when a church gathers in obedience to his word and acts on a matter like this, its decision carries his weight. That makes the act a solemn and humble one, done for the health of the body and the good of the sinner, with no room for anger or a personal grudge.

Delivered unto Satan

Verse 5 says what the gathered church is to do: “To deliver such an one unto Satan.” The verb paradídōmi means to surrender, yield up, entrust or hand over, and here it is a formal act, done with authority. The man is to be put out of the church. Israel too knew the duty of putting what defiled out of the camp, and the young church needed clear boundaries for who belonged to it and how its members lived.

What does it mean to deliver someone unto Satan?

To deliver a man unto Satan is to put him out of the fellowship, protection and spiritual blessings of the church and back into the world, which lies under Satan’s sway. Paul calls Satan “the god of this world” (2 Corinthians 4:4) and “the prince of the power of the air” (Ephesians 2:2). Within the church a believer lives among God’s people and under their care. Outside it the man would meet the full consequences of his sin and the pull of evil, with the body of Christ no longer around him. The phrase is a solemn way of naming excommunication, and Paul commands it in the hope that the hardship will shock the man into repentance.

What does “the destruction of the flesh” mean?

The word for destruction, ólethros, means ruin, and it can mean death or punishment. It need not mean annihilation. The word for flesh, sárx, can mean the body, and in Paul it very often means the sinful nature, the old self that is drawn to sin and turned away from God. Read that way, the destruction of the flesh is the breaking of sin’s power in this man. Outside the church he would feel the harsh results of his sin, and his sinful desires would be exposed, humbled and brought to an end in repentance. Paul teaches the same when he says, “if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live” (Romans 8:13).

Believers differ on how far this goes. Some hold that the flesh here also includes the man’s body, so that Paul expects bodily suffering, even death, to come on him while his spirit is saved. On either reading the destruction serves the salvation, and the man’s eternal good is the goal.

That the spirit may be saved

The goal comes last: “that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.” The spirit is the man’s inner self, the same word pneûma that Paul used of his own spirit in verses 3 and 4. To be saved, sṓzō, is to be delivered, kept and made whole. “The day of the Lord Jesus” is the day of his return and of the final judgment, the day Paul spoke of at the opening of the letter, when he wrote that Christ would confirm the Corinthians to the end, “that ye may be blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ” (1 Corinthians 1:7–8). So the sternest act in the chapter is done in love, with the man’s salvation on that day in view. God uses what looks like destruction to rescue.

Discipline that aims at restoration

Jesus himself set out the steps of discipline: telling a brother his fault alone, then with one or two witnesses, then before the church, and if he will not hear the church, treating him “as an heathen man and a publican” (Matthew 18:15–17). Paul calls those who are spiritual to restore a brother overtaken in a fault, in the spirit of meekness (Galatians 6:1). In every one of these places the purpose of discipline is to bring the sinner back.

In his second letter Paul tells the Corinthians that the punishment the many had inflicted on a certain man was sufficient, and that they should now forgive and comfort him, lest he be swallowed up with overmuch sorrow, and confirm their love toward him (2 Corinthians 2:5–11). Whether that is the man of this chapter is uncertain, but the instruction shows the end Paul has in view whenever the church disciplines: repentance, forgiveness and a welcome home. Hebrews says the same of God’s own chastening: “Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby” (Hebrews 12:11). Christ came to call sinners to repentance (Luke 5:32), and the church’s discipline follows him in that.

Is church discipline for the church today?

The church today is still called to deal with unrepentant sin in its midst, for the reasons Paul gives: to keep the church pure, to protect the flock, to keep its witness true before the world, and above all to seek the sinner’s repentance and restoration. The words “deliver such an one unto Satan” may belong to an apostle’s command in this one case, and the duty they serve remains. It is to be carried out with prayer, humility and love, by a church that grieves over sin. God’s word to his people still stands: “Be ye holy; for I am holy” (1 Peter 1:15–16).

Christ, the holy Head of a holy church

Every part of this passage rests on who Christ is. He “knew no sin” (2 Corinthians 5:21), and his church, his body, is called to share his holiness. He is “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29), and Paul calls him “our passover” a few verses later. He bore the penalty for sins as grave as this one, so forgiveness and a changed life are open even to this man. Christ “gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works” (Titus 2:14). He loved the church and gave himself for it, “that he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish” (Ephesians 5:25–27). A church that shrugs at open sin hides that purpose from the world.

The saving of the spirit is the heart of Christ’s own mission, since God sent his Son “that the world through him might be saved” (John 3:17). He was manifested to destroy the works of the devil (1 John 3:8), our old man was crucified with him to set us free from serving sin (Romans 6:6), and God means his people to be conformed to the image of his Son (Romans 8:29). The day of the Lord Jesus, which verse 5 looks toward, is the day when every knee shall bow and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father (Philippians 2:10–11).

Holiness and Mercy in One Judgment

These verses show us a God who cares too much for his people to leave them in their sin. He wants his church holy, because it is his temple and the body of his Son, and he wants the sinner saved, so the same act that guards the church reaches out to the man who is put out of it. The church grieves where the world would shrug or boast, and it acts in the name and with the power of the Lord Jesus, who is present with it. Even the hardest words in the passage, “deliver such an one unto Satan”, end on the hope “that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.” God’s discipline, in the church as in our own lives, is aimed at that day, and his grace is large enough for a man whose sin shocked the pagans.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers 1 Corinthians 5:1–6. He set out his notes in a two-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 6 verses
Passage under comment1 Corinthians 5:1–6
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Here the apostle states the case; and,

I.Lets them know what was the common or general report concerning them, that one of their community was guilty of fornication, 1 Corinthians 5:1.

It was told in all places, to their dishonour, and the reproach of Christians. And it was the more reproachful because it could not be denied. Note, The heinous sins of professed Christians are quickly noted and noised abroad. We should walk circumspectly, for many eyes are upon us, and many mouths will be opened against us if we fall into any scandalous practice. This was not a common instance of fornication, but such as was not so much as named among the Gentiles, that a man should have his father's wife - either marry her while his father was alive, or keep her as his concubine, either when he was dead or while he was alive. In either of these cases, his criminal conversation with her might be called fornication; but had his father been dead, and he, after his decease, married to her, it had been incest still, but neither fornication nor adultery in the strictest sense. But to marry her, or keep her as a concubine, while his father was alive, though he had repudiated her, or she had deserted him, whether she were his own mother or not, was incestuous fornication: Scelus incredibile (as Cicero calls it), et prater unum in omni vit inauditum (Orat. pro Cluent.), when a woman had caused her daughter to be put away, and was married to her husband. Incredible wickedness! says the orator; such I never heard of in all my life besides. Not that there were no such instances of incestuous marriages among the heathens; but, whenever they happened, they gave a shock to every man of virtue and probity among them. They could not think of them without horror, nor mention them without dislike and detestation. Yet such a horrible wickedness was committed by one in the church of Corinth, and, as is probable, a leader of one of the factions among them, a principal man. Note, The best churches are, in this state of imperfection, liable to very great corruptions. Is it any wonder when so horrible a practice was tolerated in an apostolical church, a church planted by the great apostle of the Gentiles?

II.He greatly blames them for their own conduct hereupon: They were puffed up (1 Corinthians 5:2), they gloried,

1.Perhaps on account of this very scandalous person. He might be a man of great eloquence, of deep science, and for this reason very greatly esteemed, and followed, and cried up, by many among them. They were proud that they had such a leader. Instead of mourning for his fall, and their own reproach upon his account, and renouncing him and removing him from the society, they continued to applaud him and pride themselves in him. Note, Pride or self-esteem often lies at the bottom of our immoderate esteem of others, and this makes us as blind to their faults as to our own. It is true humility that will bring a man to a sight and acknowledgement of his errors. The proud man either wholly overlooks or artfully disguises his faults, or endeavours to transform his blemishes into beauties. Those of the Corinthians that were admirers of the incestuous person's gifts could overlook or extenuate his horrid practices. Or else,

2.It may intimate to us that some of the opposite party were puffed up. They were proud of their own standing, and trampled upon him that fell. Note, It is a very wicked thing to glory over the miscarriages and sins of others. We should lay them to heart, and mourn for them, not be puffed up with them. Probably this was one effect of the divisions among them. The opposite party made their advantage of this scandalous lapse, and were glad of the opportunity. Note, It is a sad consequence of divisions among Christians that it makes them apt to rejoice in iniquity. The sins of others should be our sorrow. Nay, churches should mourn for the scandalous behaviour of particular members, and, if they be incorrigible, should remove them. He that had done this wicked deed should have been taken away from among them.

III.We have the apostle's direction to them how they should now proceed with this scandalous sinner.

He would have him excommunicated and delivered to Satan (1 Corinthians 5:3-5); as absent in body, yet present in spirit, he had judged already as if he had been present; that is, he had, by revelation and the miraculous gift of discerning vouchsafed him by the Spirit, as perfect a knowledge of the case, and had hereupon come to the following determination, not without special authority from the Holy Spirit. He says this to let them know that, though he was at a distance, he did not pass an unrighteous sentence, nor judge without having as full cognizance of the case as if he had been on the spot. Note, Those who would appear righteous judges to the world will take care to inform them that they do not pass sentence without full proof and evidence. The apostle adds, him who hath so done this deed. The fact was not only heinously evil in itself, and horrible to the heathens, but there were some particular circumstances that greatly aggravated the offence. He had so committed the evil as to heighten the guilt by the manner of doing it. Perhaps he was a minister, a teacher, or a principal man among them. By this means the church and their profession were more reproached. Note, In dealing with scandalous sinners, not only are they to be charged with the fact, but the aggravating circumstances of it. Paul had judged that he should be delivered to Satan (1 Corinthians 5:5), and this was to be done in the name of Christ, with the power of Christ, and in a full assembly, where the apostle would be also present in spirit, or by his spiritual gift of discerning at a distance. Some think that this is to be understood of a mere ordinary excommunication, and that delivering him to Satan for the destruction of the flesh is only meant of disowning him, and casting him out of the church, that by this means he might be brought to repentance, and his flesh might be mortified. Christ and Satan divide the world: and those that live in sin, when they profess relation to Christ, belong to another master, and by excommunication should be delivered up to him; and this in the name of Christ. Note, Church-censures are Christ's ordinances, and should be dispensed in his name. It was to be done also when they were gathered together, in full assembly. The more public the more solemn, and the more solemn the more likely to have a good effect on the offender. Note, Church-censures on notorious and incorrigible sinners should be passed with great solemnity. Those who sin in this manner are to be rebuked before all, that all may fear, 1 Timothy 5:20. Others think the apostle is not to be understood of mere excommunication, but of a miraculous power or authority they had of delivering a scandalous sinner into the power of Satan, to have bodily diseases inflicted, and to be tormented by him with bodily pains, which is the meaning of the destruction of the flesh. In this sense the destruction of the flesh has been a happy occasion of the salvation of the spirit. It is probable that this was a mixed case. It was an extraordinary instance: and the church was to proceed against him by just censure; the apostle, when they did so, put forth an act of extraordinary power, and gave him up to Satan, nor for his destruction, but for his deliverance, at least for the destruction of the flesh, that the soul might be saved. Note, The great end of church-censures is the good of those who fall under them, their spiritual and eternal good. It is that their spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus, 1 Corinthians 5:5. Yet it is not merely a regard to their benefit that is to be had in proceeding against them. For,

IV.He hints the danger of contagion from this example:

Your glorying is not good. Know you not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump? The bad example of a man in rank and reputation is very mischievous, spreads the contagion far and wide. It did so, probably, in this very church and case: see 2 Corinthians 12:21. They could not be ignorant of this. The experience of the whole world was for it; one scabbed sheep infects a whole flock. A little heaven will quickly spread the ferment through a great lump. Note, Concern for their purity and preservation should engage Christian churches to remove gross and scandalous sinners.

Historical interpretation

Two Centuries of Reception

3 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

3 quotes · AD 220–407
Ante-NicenePost-Nicene
200300400

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

d. AD 220TertullianAnte-NiceneSourceOn Modesty
Accordingly, he could have said that to a fornicator, too, "affection" only was conceded, not "communion "as well; to an incestuous man, however, not even "affection; "whom he would, to be sure, have bidden to be banished from their midst -much more, of course, from their mind.
d. AD 384AmbrosiasterPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON PAUL’S EPISTLES
Paul humbles their pride, but in such a way that instead of making them angry he makes them willing to cooperate with him.
And "tell me not," saith he, "that the fornicator is but one: the charge hath become common to all." Wherefore at once he added, "and ye are puffed up:" he said not, "with the sin;" for this would imply want of all reason: but with the doctrine you have heard from that person. This however he set not down himself, but left it undetermined, that he might inflict a heavier blow.

And mark the good sense of Paul. Having first overthrown the wisdom from without, and signified that it is nothing by itself although no sin were associated with it; then and not till then he discourses about the sin also. For if by way of comparison with the fornicator who perhaps was some wise one, he had maintained the greatness of his own spiritual gift; he had done no great thing: but even when unattended with sin to take down the heathen wisdom and demonstrate it to be nothing, this was indicating its extreme worthlessness indeed. Wherefore first, as I said, having made the comparison, he afterwards mentions the man's sin also.

And with him indeed he condescends not to debate, and thereby signifies the exceeding greatness of his dishonor. But to the others he saith, "You ought to weep and wail, and cover your faces, but now ye do the contrary." And this is the force of the next clause, "And ye are puffed up, and did not rather mourn."

"And why are we to weep?" some might say. Because the reproach hath made its way even unto the whole body of your Church. "And what good are we to get by our weeping?" "That such an one should be taken away from you." Not even here doth he mention his name; rather, I should say, not any where; which in all monstrous things is our usual way.

And he said not, "Ye have not rather cast him out," but, as in the case of any disease or pestilence, "there is need of mourning," saith he, "and of intense supplication, 'that he may be taken away.' And you should have used prayer for this, and left nothing undone that he should be cut off."

Nor yet doth he accuse them for not having given him information, but for not having mourned so that the man should be taken away; implying that even without their Teacher this ought to have been done, because of the notoriety of the offence.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying 1 Corinthians 5:2 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8