TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Acts 21:27–40. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
We have here Paul brought into a captivity which we are not likely to see the end of; for after this he is either hurried from one bar to another, or lies neglected, first in one prison and then in another, and can neither be tried nor bailed. When we see the beginning of a trouble, we know not either how long it will last or how it will issue.
I.We have here Paul seized, and laid hold on.
1.He was seized in the temple, when he was there attending the days of his purifying, and the solemn services of those days, Act 21:27. Formerly he had been well known in the temple, but now he had been so long in his travels abroad that he had become a stranger there; so that it was not till the seven days were almost ended that he was taken notice of by those that had an evil eye towards him. In the temple, where he should have been protected, as in a sanctuary, he was most violently set upon by those who did what they could to have his blood mingled with his sacrifices - in the temple, where he should have been welcomed as one of the greatest ornaments of it that ever had been there since the Lord of the temple left it. The temple, which they themselves pretended such a mighty zeal for, yet did they themselves thus profane. Thus is the church polluted by none more than by popish persecutors, under the colour of the church's name and interest.
2.The informers against him were the Jews of Asia, not those of Jerusalem - the Jews of the dispersion, who knew him best, and who were most exasperated against him. Those who seldom came up to worship at the temple in Jerusalem themselves, but contentedly lived at a distance from it, in pursuit of their private advantages, yet appeared most zealous for the temple, as if thereby they would atone for their habitual neglect of it.
3.The method they took was to raise the mob, and to incense them against him. They did not go to the high priest, or the magistrates of the city, with their charge (probably because they expected not to receive countenance from them), but they stirred up all the people, who were at this time more than ever disposed to any thing that was tumultuous and seditious, riotous and outrageous. Those are fittest to be employed against Christ and Christianity that are governed least by reason and most by passion; therefore Paul described the Jewish persecutors to be not only wicked, but absurd unreasonable men.
4.The arguments wherewith they exasperated the people against him were popular, but very false and unjust. They cried out, "Men of Israel, help. If you are indeed men of Israel, true-born Jews, that have a concern for your church and your country, now is your time to show it, by helping to seize an enemy to both." Thus they cried after him as after a thief (Job 30:5), or after a mad dog. Note, The enemies of Christianity, since they could never prove it to be an ill thing, have been always very industrious, right or wrong, to put it into an ill name, and so run it down by outrage and outcry. It had become men of Israel to help Paul, who preached up him who was so much the glory of his people Israel; yet here the popular fury will not allow them to be men of Israel, unless they will help against him. This was like, Stop thief, or Athaliah's cry, Treason, treason; what is wanting in right is made up in noise.
5.They charge upon him both bad doctrine and bad practice, and both against the Mosaic ritual.
(1.)They charge upon him bad doctrine; not only that he holds corrupt opinions himself, but that he vents and publishes them, though not here at Jerusalem, yet in other places, nay in all places, he teaches all men, every where; so artfully is the crime aggravated, as if, because he was an itinerant, he was a ubiquitary: "He spreads to the utmost of his power certain damnable and heretical positions," [1.] Against the people of the Jews. He had taught that Jews and Gentiles stand on the same level before God, and neither circumcision avails any thing nor uncircumcision; nay, he had taught against the unbelieving Jews that they were rejected (and therefore had separated from them and their synagogues), and this is interpreted to be speaking against the whole nation, as if no doubt but they were the people, and wisdom must die with them (Job 12:2), whereas God, though he had cast them off, yet had not cast away his people, Rom 11:1. They were Lo-ammi, not a people (Hos 1:9), and yet pretended to be the only people. Those commonly seem most jealous for the church's name that belong to it in name only. [2.] Against the law. His teaching men to believe the gospel as the end of the law, and the perfection of it, was interpreted his preaching against the law; whereas it was so far from making void the law that it established it, Rom 3:31. [3.] Against this place, the temple. Because he taught men to pray every where, he was reproached as an enemy to the temple, and perhaps because he sometimes mentioned the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple, and of the Jewish nation, which his Master had foretold. Paul had himself been active in persecuting Stephen, and putting him to death for words spoken against this holy place, and now the same thing is laid to his charge. He that was then made use of as the tool is now set up as the butt of Jewish rage and malice.
(2.)They charge upon him bad practices. To confirm their charge against him, as teaching people against this holy place, they charge it upon him that he had himself polluted it, and by an overt-act showed his contempt of it, and a design to make it common. He has brought Gentiles also into the temple, into the inner court of the temple, which none that were uncircumcised were admitted, under any pretence, to come into; there was written upon the wall that enclosed this inner court, in Greek and Latin, It is a capital crime for strangers to enter. - Josephus Antiq. 15.417. Paul was himself a Jew, and had right to enter into the court of the Jews. And they, seeing some with him there that joined with him in his devotions, concluded that Trophimus an Ephesian, who was a Gentile, was one of them. Why? Did they see him there? Truly no; but they had seen him with Paul in the streets of the city, which was no crime at all, and therefore they affirm that he was with Paul in the inner court of the temple, which was a heinous crime. They had seen him with him in the city, and therefore they supposed that Paul had brought him with him into the temple, which was utterly false. See here,
[1.]Innocency is no fence against calumny and false accusation. It is no new thing for those that mean honestly, and act regularly, to have things laid to their charge which they know not, nor ever thought of.
[2.]Evil men dig up mischief, and go far to seek proofs of their false accusations, as they did here, who, because they saw a Gentile with Paul in the city, will thence infer that he was with him in the temple. This was a strained innuendo indeed, yet by such unjust and groundless suggestions have wicked men thought to justify themselves in the most barbarous outrages committed upon the excellent ones of the earth.
[3.]It is common for malicious people to improve that against those that are wise and good with which they thought to have obliged them and ingratiated themselves with them. Paul thought to recommend himself to their good opinion by going into the temple, he had not been so maligned by them. This is the genius of ill-nature; for my love, they are my adversaries, Psa 109:4; Psa 69:10.
We have Paul in danger of being pulled in pieces by the rabble. They will not be at the pains to have him before the high priest, or the sanhedrim; that is a roundabout way: the execution shall be of a piece with the prosecution, all unjust and irregular. They cannot prove the crime upon him, and therefore dare not bring him upon a fair trial; nay, so greedily do they thirst after his blood that they have not patience to proceed against him by a due course of law, though they were ever so sure to gain their point; and therefore, as those who neither feared God nor regarded man, they resolved to knock him on the head immediately.
1.All the city was in an uproar, Act 21:30. The people, who though they had little holiness themselves, yet had a mighty veneration for the holy place, when they heard a hue-and-cry from the temple, were up in arms presently, being resolved to stand by that with their lives and fortunes. All the city was moved, when they were called to from the temple, Men of Israel, help, with as much violence as if the old complaint were revived (Psa 79:1), O God, the heathen are come into thine inheritance, thy holy temple have they defiled. Just such a zeal the Jews here show for God's temple as the Ephesians did for Diana's temple, when Paul was informed against as an enemy to that (Act 19:29): The whole city was full of confusion. But God does not reckon himself at all honoured by those whose zeal for him transports them to such irregularities, and who, while they pretend to act for him, act in such a brutish barbarous manner.
2.They drew Paul out of the temple, and shut the doors between the outer and inner court of the temple, or perhaps the doors of the outer court. In dragging him furiously out of the temple,
(1.)They showed a real detestation of him as one not fit to be suffered in the temple, nor to worship there, nor to be looked upon as a member of the Jewish nation; as if his sacrifice had been an abomination.
(2.)They pretended a veneration for the temple; like that of good Jehoiada, who would not have Athaliah to be slain in the house of the Lord, Kg2 11:15. See how absurd these wicked men were; they condemned Paul for drawing people from the temple, and yet, when he himself was very devoutly worshipping in the temple, they drew him out of it. The officers of the temple shut the doors, either,
[1.]Lest Paul should find means to get back and take hold of the horns of the altar, and so protect himself by that sanctuary from their rage. Or rather,
[2.]Lest the crowd should by the running in of more to them be thrust back into the temple, and some outrage should be committed, to the profanation of that holy place. Those that made no conscience of doing so ill a thing as the murdering of a good man for well-doing, yet would be thought to scruple doing it in a holy place, or at a holy time: Not in the temple, as Not on the feast-day.
3.They went about to kill him (Act 21:31), for they fell a beating him (Act 21:32), resolving to beat him to death by blows without number, a punishment which the Jewish doctors allowed in some cases (not at all to the credit of their nation), and called the beating of the rebels. Now was Paul, like a lamb, thrown into a den of lions, and made an easy prey to them, and, no doubt, he was still of the same mind as when he said, I am ready not only to be bound, but to die at Jerusalem, to die so great a death.
III.We have here Paul rescued out of the hands of his Jewish enemies by a Roman enemy.
1.Tidings were brought of the tumult, and that the mob was up, to the chief captain of the band, the governor of the castle, or, whoever he was, the now commander-in-chief of the Roman forces that were quartered in Jerusalem. Somebody that was concerned not for Paul, but for the public peace and safety, gave this information to the colonel, who had always a jealous and watchful eye upon these tumultuous Jews, and he is the man that must be instrumental to save Paul's life, when never a friend he had was capable of doing him any service.
2.The tribune, or chief captain, got his forces together with all possible expedition, and went to suppress the mob: He took soldiers and centurions, and ran down to them. Now at the feast, as at other such solemn times, the guards were up, and the militia more within call than at other times, and so he had them near at hand, and he ran down unto the multitude; for at such times delays are dangerous. Sedition must be crushed at first, lest it grow headstrong.
3.The very sight of the Roman general frightened them from beating Paul; for they knew they were doing what they could not justify, and were in danger of being called in question for this day's uproar, as the town clerk told the Ephesians. They were deterred from that by the power of the Romans from which they ought to have been restrained by the justice of God and the dread of his wrath. Note, God often makes the earth to help the woman (Rev 12:16), and those to be a protection to his people who yet have no affection for his people; they have only a compassion for sufferers, and are zealous for the public peace. The shepherd makes use even of his dogs for the defence of his sheep. It is Streso's comparison here. See here how these wicked people were frightened away at the very sight of the chief captain; for the king that sitteth on the throne of judgment scattereth away all evil with his eyes. The governor takes him into custody. He rescued him, not out of a concern for him, because he thought him innocent, but out of a concern for justice, because he ought not to be put to death without trial; and because he knew not how dangerous the consequence might be to the Roman government of such tumultuous proceedings were not timely suppressed, nor what such an outrageous people might do if once they knew their own strength: he therefore takes Paul out of the hands of the mob into the hands of the law (v. 33): He took him, and commanded him to be bound with two chains, that the people might be satisfied he did not intend to discharge him, but to examine him, for he demanded of those who were so eager against him who he was, and what he had done. This violent taking of him out of the hands of the multitude, though there was all the reason in the world for it, yet they laid to the charge of the chief captain as his crime (Act 24:7): The chief captain Lysias came with great violence, and took him out of our hands, which refers to this rescue as appears by comparing Act 23:27, Act 23:28, where the chief captain gives an account of it to Felix.
IV.The provision which the chief captain made, with much ado, to bring Paul to speak for himself.
One had almost as good enter into a struggle with the winds and the waves, as with such a mob as was here got together; and yet Paul made a shift to get liberty of speech among them.
1.There was no knowing the sense of the people; for when the chief captain enquired concerning Paul, having perhaps never heard of his name before (such strangers were the great ones to the excellent ones of the earth, and affected to be so), some cried one thing, and some another, among the multitude; so that it was impossible for the chief captain to know their mind, when really they knew not either one another's mind or their own, when every one pretended to give the sense of the whole body. Those that will hearken to the clamours of the multitude will know nothing for a certainty, any more than the builders of Babel, when their tongues were confounded.
2.There was no quelling the rage and fury of the people; for when the chief captain commanded that Paul should be carried into the castle, the tower of Antonia, where the Roman soldiers kept garrison, near the temple, the soldiers themselves had much ado to get him safely thither out of the noise, the people were so violent (Act 21:35): When he came upon the stairs, leading up to the castle, the soldiers were forced to take him up in their arms, and carry him (which they might easily do, for he was a little man, and his bodily presence weak), to keep him from the people, who would have pulled him limb from limb if they could. When they could not reach him with their cruel hands, they followed him with their sharp arrows, even bitter words: They followed, crying, Away with him, Act 21:36. See how the most excellent persons and things are often run down by a popular clamour. Christ himself was so, with, Crucify him, crucify him, though they could not say what evil he had done. Take him out of the land of the living (so the ancients expound it), chase him out of the world.
3.Paul at length begged leave of the chief captain to speak to him (Act 21:37): As he was to be led into the castle, with a great deal of calmness and composedness in himself, and a great deal of mildness and deference to those about him, he said unto the chief captain, "May I speak unto thee? Will it be no offence, nor construed as a breach of rule, if I give thee some account of myself, since my persecutors can give no account of me?" What a humble modest question was this! Paul knew how to speak to the greatest of men, and had many a time spoken to his betters, yet he humbly begs to leave to speak to this commander, and will not speak till he has obtained leave: May I speak unto thee?
4.The chief captain tells him what notion he had of him: Canst thou speak Greek? I am surprised to hear thee speak a learned language; for, Art not thou that Egyptian who made an uproar? The Jews made the uproar, and then would have it thought that Paul had given them occasion for it, by beginning first; for probably some of them whispered this in the ear of the chief captain. See what false mistaken notions of good people and good ministers many run away with, and will not be at the pains to have the mistake rectified. It seems, there had lately been an insurrection somewhere in that country, headed by an Egyptian, who took on him to be a prophet. Josephus mentions this story, that "an Egyptian raised a seditious party, promised to show them the fall of the walls of Jerusalem from the mount of Olives, and that they should enter the city upon the ruins." The captain here says that he led out into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers - desperadoes, banditti, raparees, cut-throats. What a degeneracy was there in the Jewish nation, when there were found there so many that had such a character, and could be drawn into such an attempt upon the public peace! But Josephus says that "Felix the Roman president went out against them, killed four hundred, and took two hundred prisoners, and the rest were dispersed." - Antiq. 20.171; Wars 2.263. And Eusebius speaks of it, Hist. 2:20. It happened in the thirteenth year of Claudius, a little before those days, about three years ago. The ringleader of this rebellion, it seems, had made his escape, and the chief captain concluded that one who lay under so great an odium as Paul seemed to lie under, and against whom there was so great an outcry, could not be a criminal of less figure than this Egyptian. See how good men are exposed to ill-will by mistake.
5.Paul rectifies his mistake concerning him, by informing him particularly what he was; not such a vagabond, a scoundrel, a rake, as that Egyptian, who could give no good account of himself. No: I am a man who is a Jew originally, and no Egyptian - a Jew both by nation and religion; I am of Tarsus, a city of Cilicia, of honest parents and a liberal education (Tarsus was a university), and, besides that, a citizen of no mean city. Whether he means Tarsus or Rome is not certain; they were neither of them mean cities, and he was a freeman of both. Though the chief captain had put him under such an invidious suspicion, that he was that Egyptian, he kept his temper, did not break out into any passionate exclamations against the times he lived in or the men he had to do with, did not render railing for railing, but mildly denied the charge, and owned what he was.
6.He humbly desired a permission from the chief captain, whose prisoner he now was, to speak to the people. He does not demand it as a debt, though he might have done so, but sues for it as a favour, which he will be thankful for: I beseech thee, suffer me to speak to the people. The chief captain rescued him with no other design than to give him a fair hearing. Now, to show that his cause needs no art to give it a plausible colour, he desires he may have leave immediately to defend himself; for it needed no more than to be set in a true light; nor did he depend only on the goodness of his cause, but upon the goodness and fidelity of his patron, and that promise of his to all his advocates, that it should be given them in that same hour what they should speak.
7.He obtained leave to plead his own cause, for he needed not to have counsel assigned him, when the Spirit of the Father was ready to dictate to him, Mat 10:20. The chief captain gave him license (Act 21:40), so that now he could speak with a good grace, and with the more courage; he had, I will not say that favour, but that justice, done him by the chief captain, which he could not obtain from his countrymen the Jews; for they would not hear him, but the captain would, though it were but to satisfy his curiosity. This licence being obtained,
(1.)The people were attentive to hear: Paul stood on the stairs, which gave a little man like Zaccheus some advantage, and consequently some boldness, in delivering himself. A sorry pulpit it was, and yet better than none; it served the purpose, though it was not, like Ezra's pulpit of wood, made for the purpose. There he beckoned with the hand unto the people, made signs to them to be quiet and to have a little patience, for he had something to say to them; and so far he gained his point that every one cried hush to his neighbour, and there was made a profound silence. Probably the chief captain also intimated his charge to all manner of people to keep silence; if the people were not required to give audience, it was to no purpose at all that Paul was allowed to speak. When the cause of Christ and his gospel is to be pleaded, there ought to be a great silence, that we may give the more earnest heed, and all little enough.
(2.)Paul addressed himself to speak, well assured that he was serving the interest of Christ's kingdom as truly and effectually as if he had been preaching in the synagogue: he spoke unto them in the Hebrew tongue, that is, in their own vulgar tongue, which was the language of their country, to which he hereby owned not only an abiding relation, but an abiding respect.
Historical interpretation
Three Centuries of Reception
3 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Observe how, when he discourses to those that are without, he does not decline availing himself of the aids afforded by the laws. Here he awes the tribune by the name of his city. And again, elsewhere he said, "Openly, uncondemned, Romans as we are, they have cast us into prison." For since the tribune said, "Art thou that Egyptian?" he immediately drew him off from that surmise: then, that he may not be thought to deny his nation, he says at once, "I am a Jew:" he means his religion. What then? he did not deny (that he was a Christian): God forbid: for he was both a Jew and a Christian, observing what things he ought: since indeed he, most of all men, did obey the law. The man that believes in Christ. And when discoursing with Peter, he says: "We, Jews by nature. But I beseech thee, suffer me to speak unto the people." And this is a proof, that he does not speak lies, seeing he takes all as his witnesses. Observe again how mildly he speaks. This again is a very strong argument that he is chargeable with no crime, his being so ready to make his defence, and his wishing to come to discourse with the people of the Jews. See a man well-prepared! Mark the providential ordering of the thing: unless the tribune had come, unless he had bound him, he would not have desired to speak for his defence, he would not have obtained the silence he did. "Standing on the stairs." Then there was the additional facility afforded by the locality, that he should have a high place to harangue them from - in chains too! What spectacle could be equal to this, to see Paul, bound with two chains, and haranguing the people! To see him, how he was not a whit perturbed, not a whit confused; how, seeing as he did so great a multitude all hostility against him, the ruler standing by, he first of all made them desist from their anger: then, how prudently he does this. Just what he does in his Epistle to the Hebrews, the same he does here: first he attracts them by the sound of their common mother tongue: then by his mildness itself.
I am indeed a man, a Jew from Tarsus of Cilicia, a citizen of no insignificant city. For 'citizen' some Codices have 'municipate,' which is translated from one Greek word πολίτης, derived from the name of the city, which in Greek is called πόλις. Whence that which the Apostle says: But our conversation is in heaven (Philippians III), some have interpreted: But our citizenship is in heaven. And Jerome, writing to Heliodorus, put it thus: "For he wanted no other citizenship to be understood, than a civil conversation, which in Greek is called πολίτευμα."
A townsman from Tarsus in Cilicia, a not unknown city. The Apostle was indeed born in the town of Giscala in Galilee. When it was captured by the Romans, he moved with his parents to Tarsus in Cilicia. From there, sent to Jerusalem for the study of the law, he was instructed by Gamaliel, a very learned man, as he himself recounts later. However, he calls himself not a citizen but a townsman, from the township, that is, the territory, of the same city in which he was raised. It is called a municipality, because it only pays duties or taxes. For noble and very famous causes, and those which derive from the emperor, belong to the dignity of the cities. And no wonder that he calls himself a Tarsian and not a Giscalite, since the Lord Himself, although born in Bethlehem, is not called a Bethlehemite but a Nazarene.
Continue studying Acts 21:39 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
In Acts 21:39, the Apostle Paul, having been rescued by Roman soldiers from a violent mob in Jerusalem, asserts his identity to the Roman commander, Claudius Lysias. He clarifies that he is not a common criminal or an Egyptian insurrectionist, but a Jew from Tarsus in Cilicia, a city of considerable repute. This strategic disclosure of his background serves to establish his credibility and, crucially, to obtain permission to address the very crowd that had just attempted to kill him, demonstrating his unwavering commitment to his evangelistic mission.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is situated at a critical juncture in Paul's third missionary journey, specifically during his final visit to Jerusalem as recorded in Acts 21. Paul has arrived in Jerusalem, fulfilling a prophetic warning of impending suffering (Acts 21:10-14). His attempt to show solidarity with Jewish customs by undergoing a purification rite in the Temple backfires when Jews from Asia, recognizing him, stir up a riot, falsely accusing him of defiling the Temple by bringing Gentiles into its sacred precincts (Acts 21:27-29). The Roman commander intervenes to save Paul from being lynched, and initially, he mistakes Paul for a notorious Egyptian revolutionary (Acts 21:38). Paul's statement in Acts 21:39 is his immediate response to this misconception, a pivotal moment that opens the door for his defense before both the Jewish crowd and later, Roman authorities.
Historical & Cultural Context
Tarsus, located in the Roman province of Cilicia (modern-day Turkey), was a highly significant city in the 1st century AD. It was a major commercial hub, strategically positioned on the Cydnus River, and a renowned center of Hellenistic learning, rivaling Athens and Alexandria in its philosophical schools and intellectual life. Emperor Augustus had granted Tarsus the status of a "free city," meaning it enjoyed a degree of self-governance and its citizens were exempt from certain Roman taxes, though it was not a Roman colony like Philippi. Paul's declaration of being a "citizen of no mean city" was a powerful statement of his social standing and intellectual background, directly addressing the Roman commander's assumption that he was a common agitator. Furthermore, his identity as a "Jew of Tarsus" underscored his dual heritage—deeply rooted in Jewish tradition (as a Pharisee, Philippians 3:5) yet also shaped by the broader Hellenistic world, making him uniquely equipped for his mission to both Jews and Gentiles.
Key Themes
This verse powerfully contributes to several key themes within the book of Acts and Paul's ministry. Firstly, it highlights Paul's strategic use of his identity and background for the sake of the Gospel. He leverages his Roman citizenship and his esteemed Tarsian origin to gain a hearing, demonstrating that all aspects of one's life can be consecrated for God's purposes. Secondly, it underscores Paul's unwavering boldness and commitment to evangelism, even in the face of extreme danger. Despite having just been rescued from a murderous mob, his immediate request is to preach the Gospel to them, echoing his earlier declaration that he considers his life worth nothing if he can "finish the race and complete the task the Lord Jesus has given me—the task of testifying to the good news of God's grace" (Acts 20:24). Lastly, the entire episode, from the riot to the Roman intervention and Paul's opportunity to speak, illustrates divine providence at work. What appears to be a chaotic and life-threatening situation is divinely orchestrated to provide Paul with a platform to bear witness to Christ before various audiences, fulfilling the Lord's promise that he would testify in Jerusalem, Rome, and before kings (Acts 23:11).
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
Paul identifies himself as a "Jew of Tarsus." This term, derived from "Judah," signifies belonging to the Jewish people and their religious and cultural heritage. For Paul, this was not merely an ethnic designation but the foundation of his upbringing as a Pharisee, "trained according to the strict sect of our religion" (Acts 26:5). His emphasis on being a Jew from Tarsus distinguished him from a Jerusalem-born Jew, highlighting his broader background, yet firmly asserting his identity within the Jewish nation.
Paul declares himself a "citizen" of Tarsus. This word, polítēs, refers to a townsman or inhabitant of a polis (city). In the Roman context, being a citizen of a "free city" like Tarsus carried significant prestige and rights, though distinct from Roman citizenship itself (which Paul also possessed, as revealed in Acts 22:25-29). This assertion of his status as a legitimate, respected inhabitant of a notable city was crucial in disabusing the Roman commander of the notion that Paul was a mere vagrant or criminal.
The phrase "no mean city" translates the Greek ou ásēmos pólis. The word ásēmos means "unmarked," "insignificant," or "ignoble." By using the emphatic double negative ("not insignificant"), Paul underscores the considerable reputation, influence, and importance of Tarsus. This was a direct and effective rhetorical strategy to elevate his own standing in the eyes of the Roman official, contrasting sharply with the commander's initial assumption that Paul was from an obscure or disreputable background, such as the Egyptian terrorist who had led a band of assassins.
Verse Breakdown
"But Paul said, I am a man [which am] a Jew of Tarsus, [a city] in Cilicia"
Paul immediately corrects the commander's misidentification. He asserts his true identity as a human being ("a man") who is ethnically a "Jew," specifically from "Tarsus," a city located in the Roman province of "Cilicia." This statement is precise, providing geographical and ethnic markers that immediately distinguish him from the Egyptian insurgent. It highlights his legitimate origin and background.
"a citizen of no mean city"
This is a powerful rhetorical flourish. Paul emphasizes the high standing and reputation of Tarsus. By stating it is "of no mean (insignificant) city," he uses a litotes (a double negative) to affirm its considerable importance and prestige. This implies that he himself, as a citizen of such a city, is also a person of substance and not a common criminal or a leader of a disreputable band.
"and, I beseech thee, suffer me to speak unto the people"
Having established his credibility and respectable background, Paul makes a direct and urgent plea to the commander. The phrase "I beseech thee" (Greek déomai) conveys a strong request, almost a binding petition. He asks for "permission" (epitrépō, to allow or give leave) to address the very crowd that had just violently attacked him. This reveals Paul's unwavering focus on his mission to preach the Gospel, seeing even this perilous situation as an opportunity for witness.
Literary Devices
Paul's statement in Acts 21:39 employs several effective literary devices. Most prominently, he uses Litotes in the phrase "no mean city." This figure of speech, where an affirmative is expressed by negating its opposite, serves to emphasize the considerable importance and reputation of Tarsus. It's a subtle yet powerful way to convey that Tarsus was a city of significant standing, thereby elevating Paul's own status in the eyes of the Roman commander. Furthermore, Paul's entire address is an exercise in Ethos, establishing his credibility and character. By clearly stating his background as a Jew from a respected city, he builds trust with the commander, distinguishing himself from the assumed identity of a revolutionary. This strategic use of his personal identity and background allows him to gain a crucial opportunity to speak. The scene also demonstrates dramatic Irony, as Paul, having just been saved from a mob, immediately requests to speak to them, highlighting his audacious commitment to his mission, even in the face of extreme danger.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Paul's assertion of his identity in Acts 21:39 is more than a mere biographical detail; it is a theological statement about God's sovereign use of diverse backgrounds for His purposes. Paul, a Jew from a prominent Hellenistic city, a Pharisee by training, and a Roman citizen, embodies the very bridge between the Jewish and Gentile worlds that was central to his apostolic calling. His willingness to leverage his social standing and intellectual heritage for the sake of the Gospel demonstrates a profound understanding that all aspects of one's life, identity, and experiences can be consecrated to God's service. This episode underscores the theme of divine providence, where even moments of intense persecution are transformed into platforms for witness, fulfilling God's overarching plan for the spread of the Gospel.
Reflection and Application
Paul's actions in Acts 21:39 offer profound lessons for believers today. Firstly, we are reminded that our personal identity, background, and experiences are not accidental but are sovereignly woven by God into the fabric of our lives for His purposes. Just as Paul leveraged his Tarsian and Jewish heritage, we too can consider how our unique stories, professions, cultural contexts, or educational backgrounds can serve as platforms for sharing the Gospel. This requires a discerning spirit, recognizing opportunities for witness even in unexpected or challenging circumstances. Secondly, Paul's audacious request to speak to the very crowd that sought his life is a powerful call to courage in evangelism. It challenges us to move beyond fear and discomfort, trusting that God can open doors and grant us words even in hostile environments. Our mission is not contingent on comfortable settings but on faithful obedience, believing that God's power is made perfect in weakness. Ultimately, this passage encourages us to view every situation, whether favorable or adverse, as a potential opportunity for God's redemptive work, reminding us that His providence can turn apparent setbacks into strategic advances for His kingdom.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was it important for Paul to state he was from Tarsus, a "no mean city"?
It was crucial for Paul to state he was from Tarsus, a "no mean city," to immediately correct the Roman commander's mistaken identity. The commander initially thought Paul was an Egyptian insurrectionist, a leader of a notorious band of assassins (Acts 21:38). By identifying himself as a Jew from Tarsus, a city renowned for its intellectual and commercial significance in the Roman Empire, Paul was asserting his legitimate, respectable background. This distinguished him from a common criminal or a foreign agitator, establishing his credibility and social standing. It was a strategic move to gain the commander's respect and, ultimately, permission to address the crowd, which he successfully achieved in Acts 21:40).
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Acts 21:39, while focusing on Paul's identity and mission, finds its ultimate fulfillment and deepest meaning in Christ. Paul's willingness to suffer and strategically use his background for the Gospel mirrors Christ's own embodiment of diverse identities for redemptive purposes. Jesus, though fully divine, "made himself nothing by taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness" (Philippians 2:7). He was "a Jew of Nazareth," a town considered insignificant (John 1:46), yet He was the Son of God, the King of kings. Paul's boldness in facing a hostile crowd, driven by his commitment to proclaim the truth, reflects Christ's own unwavering resolve to go to Jerusalem, knowing the suffering that awaited Him, in order to fulfill His mission of salvation (Luke 9:51). Ultimately, Paul's entire life and ministry, including his strategic identity disclosure and his passion for evangelism, were a living out of his union with Christ, who called him to be a witness to both Jews and Gentiles (Acts 26:16-18). Paul's suffering and subsequent opportunity to speak before authorities foreshadow the suffering and exaltation of Christ, who, through His death and resurrection, secured the ultimate platform for the Gospel to be proclaimed to all nations (Matthew 28:18-20).