Acts 24:7

But the chief captain Lysias came [upon us], and with great violence took [him] away out of our hands,

But {G1161} the chief captain {G5506} Lysias {G3079} came {G3928} upon us, and with {G3326} great {G4183} violence {G970} took him away {G520} out of {G1537} our {G2257} hands {G5495},

Commentary

Acts 24:7 is part of Tertullus's opening statement against the Apostle Paul before Governor Felix in Caesarea. This verse presents a biased and inaccurate account of chief captain Lysias's intervention in Jerusalem, aiming to discredit both Paul and the Roman tribune.

Context

In this passage, Tertullus, a professional orator representing the Jewish high priest Ananias and the elders, is prosecuting Paul. He attempts to paint Paul as a dangerous troublemaker and a leader of a sect, deserving of punishment. Verse 7 specifically refers to the events in Jerusalem where Paul was nearly killed by a mob. Tertullus conveniently omits the fact that the "violence" he describes was actually Lysias rescuing Paul from an unlawful lynching attempt by the Jewish crowd (Acts 21:31-32). Lysias, as a Roman officer, intervened to protect a Roman citizen, not to violently disrupt a lawful process. This statement by Tertullus is a clear example of how facts can be twisted to serve an agenda in a legal proceeding.

Key Themes

  • Misrepresentation of Truth: The verse highlights how easily facts can be distorted in legal or public discourse to achieve a desired outcome. Tertullus's accusation of Lysias's "great violence" was a manipulative tactic to make the Roman intervention seem unjust and to imply that the Jewish leaders had a legitimate right to execute Paul.
  • Roman Authority and Justice: Despite Tertullus's spin, the actual events demonstrate the Roman legal system's role in protecting its citizens. Lysias's actions, though described as "violent," were in fact a necessary exercise of authority to prevent murder and ensure a proper legal process for a Roman citizen like Paul (Acts 22:25-29).
  • Divine Providence: Underlying these human machinations, God's plan for Paul to testify in Rome was unfolding. Lysias's intervention, even if misconstrued by Tertullus, was instrumental in preserving Paul's life and moving him closer to Caesarea and eventually to Rome, as foretold by the Lord (Acts 23:11).

Linguistic Insights

The KJV phrase "great violence" translates the Greek words bia pollฤ“ (ฮฒฮฏฮฑ ฯ€ฮฟฮปฮปฮฎ). While "violence" accurately describes the forceful nature of Lysias's intervention, Tertullus uses it with a negative connotation, implying an unwarranted aggression against the Jewish leaders. In reality, it was a necessary and forceful act to save Paul from the violent mob. This demonstrates how a seemingly neutral word can be charged with bias depending on the speaker's intent and perspective.

Practical Application

This verse serves as a reminder that we must be discerning consumers of information, especially when accusations are made. Not every account, even under oath, reflects the full or accurate truth. It encourages us to:

  • Seek the Full Story: Always look beyond initial accusations to understand the complete context and motives behind statements.
  • Trust in God's Sovereignty: Even when facing false accusations or manipulative tactics, God can use difficult circumstances to advance His purposes and protect His servants.
  • Stand for Truth: Like Paul, who later defends himself by presenting the true narrative, believers are called to uphold truth, even when it is unpopular or challenging.
Note: If the commentary doesnโ€™t appear instantly, please allow 2โ€“5 seconds for it to load. It is generated by Gemini 2.5 Flash using a prompt focused on Biblical fidelity over bias. While the insights have been consistently reliable, we encourage prayerful discernment through the Holy Spirit.

Please note that only the commentary section is AI-generated โ€” the main Scripture and cross-references are stored on the site and are from trusted and verified sources.

Cross-References

No cross-references found.

โ† Back