Skip to content

Matthew 16:13

“Peter's Confession of Christ”Matthew 16:13–20
King James Version
When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
When G1161 Jesus G2424 came G2064 into G1519 the coasts G3313 of Caesarea G2542 Philippi G5376, he asked G2065 his G846 disciples G3101, saying G3004, Whom G5101 do men G444 say G3004 that I G3165 the Son G5207 of man G444 am G1511?

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, He questioned His disciples: “Who do people say the Son of Man is?”

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
Now when Jesus came into the parts of Cæsarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Who do men say that the Son of man is?

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
Now when Yeshua came into the parts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, “Who do men say that I, the Son of Man, am?”

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
Nowe when Iesus came into the coastes of Cesarea Philippi, hee asked his disciples, saying, Whome doe men say that I, the sonne of man am?

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
And Jesus, having come to the parts of Caesarea Philippi, was asking his disciples, saying, `Who do men say me to be--the Son of Man?'

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
25 Greek words
  1. ἘλθὼνElthōnHaving comeG2064V-2AAP-NSMVerb 2nd Aorist Active Participle Nominative Singular Masculine
  2. δὲdethenG1161CONJConjunction
  3. ὁho[the]G3588T-NSMDefinite article Nominative Singular Masculine
  4. ἸησοῦςIēsousJesusG2424N-NSM-PNoun Nominative Singular Masculine Individual
  5. εἰςeisintoG1519PREPPreposition
  6. τὰtatheG3588T-APNDefinite article Accusative Plural Neuter
  7. μέρηmerēdistrictG3313N-APNNoun Accusative Plural Neuter
  8. ΚαισαρείαςKaisareiasof CaesareaG2542N-GSF-LNoun Genitive Singular Feminine Location
  9. τῆςtēs[the]G3588T-GSFDefinite article Genitive Singular Feminine
  10. ΦιλίππουPhilippouPhilippiG5376N-GSM-PNoun Genitive Singular Masculine Individual
  11. ἠρώταērōtaHe was questioningG2065V-IAI-3SVerb Imperfect Active Indicative 3rd Singular
  12. τοὺςtoustheG3588T-APMDefinite article Accusative Plural Masculine
  13. μαθητὰςmathētasdisciplesG3101N-APMNoun Accusative Plural Masculine
  14. αὐτοῦautouof HimG846P-GSMPersonal pronoun Genitive Singular Masculine
  15. λέγων·legōnsayingG3004V-PAP-NSMVerb Present Active Participle Nominative Singular Masculine
  16. τίναtinaWhomG5101I-ASMInterrogative pronoun Accusative Singular Masculine
  17. μεmeMeG3165P-1ASPersonal pronoun Accusative 1st Singular
  18. λέγουσινlegousindo pronounceG3004V-PAI-3PVerb Present Active Indicative 3rd Plural
  19. οἱhoi[the]G3588T-NPMDefinite article Nominative Plural Masculine
  20. ἄνθρωποιanthrōpoimenG444N-NPMNoun Nominative Plural Masculine
  21. εἶναιeinaito beG1511V-PANVerb Present Active Infinitive
  22. τὸνtontheG3588T-ASMDefinite article Accusative Singular Masculine
  23. υἱὸνhuionSonG5207N-ASMNoun Accusative Singular Masculine
  24. τοῦtou[the]G3588T-GSMDefinite article Genitive Singular Masculine
  25. ἀνθρώπου;anthrōpouof man?G444N-GSMNoun Genitive Singular Masculine
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
All Matthew Sites (Jerusalem)
All Matthew Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
Matthew 16:13-19
Matthew 16:13-19 View full PDF
All Matthew Sites (Levant)
All Matthew Sites (Levant) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 23,686 of 31,102 · 76.2%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

At Caesarea Philippi Jesus asks his disciples who people say that he, the Son of man, is, and so opens the way to Peter’s confession.

“When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi,”

The journey takes Jesus out of Galilee, where the leaders had just demanded a sign, into Gentile country around a city of shrines.

“he asked his disciples, saying,”

Jesus opens the conversation, as the teacher leading his pupils toward what they need to say.

“Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?”

He asks first about people in general, and he calls himself by the title from Daniel’s vision, which already hints at the answer.

Thou Art the Christ, the Son of the Living God

Matthew 16:13–20

Summary

Far to the north, near Caesarea Philippi, Jesus asks his disciples who people say he is. They pass on the crowd’s answers: John the Baptist, Elias, Jeremias, or one of the prophets. Then he asks them, and Simon Peter answers, “Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.” Jesus calls him blessed, because the Father in heaven showed him this. He names him Peter, promises to build his own church upon this rock, says that “the gates of hell shall not prevail against it”, and gives Peter the keys of the kingdom of heaven. Then he charges the disciples to “tell no man” that he is the Christ. These eight verses hold the question every person must answer about Jesus, the answer God himself gives, and Christ’s promise to build and keep his church.

Who men said Jesus was

Matthew sets this conversation after a run of hard meetings. The Pharisees and Sadducees had asked Jesus for a sign from heaven while failing to discern the signs of the times (Matthew 16:1–4), and Jesus had warned his disciples to beware of the leaven, that is the teaching, of those leaders (Matthew 16:5–12). He had lately fed the four thousand. Now he takes the twelve far north, away from the crowds and from the men who opposed him, and asks them who he is. Mark records the same conversation (Mark 8:27–30).

Caesarea Philippi

“The coasts of Caesarea Philippi” are the district around the city, for the word méros means a part or share, and so a region. The city stood at the foot of Mount Hermon, at the northernmost point of Jesus’ ministry and far from Jerusalem. Its older name was Paneas, from the Greek god Pan, and Philip, one of Herod’s sons, renamed it in honour of Caesar and of himself. A great rock face rose over the town, and shrines to Pan and to Caesar stood there. In a place given over to idols and to the worship of Roman power, Jesus asks who he is, and Peter answers that he is the Son of the living God. Here, among the gods of the nations and the honours paid to Caesar, the truth about Jesus comes from the Father in heaven.

Why Jesus asks

“He asked” is erōtáō, to ask a question or make a request. The one asking already knows what people are saying. He asks so that his disciples will say it aloud, and the first question leads to the second, which leads to Peter’s confession. A good teacher draws the answer out of his pupils, and Jesus does exactly that here.

I the Son of man

“The Son of man” is the name Jesus uses for himself most often in the Gospels. It joins huiós, son, a word used very widely for kinship, to ánthrōpos, a human being, the same word that stands behind “men” in “Whom do men say”. The title tells us that Jesus is truly man and shares our human life. It also takes us to Daniel’s vision of “one like the Son of man” who “came with the clouds of heaven” and was given “dominion, and glory, and a kingdom”, for “his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away” (Daniel 7:13–14). So the name speaks both of his lowliness and of his authority as heaven’s King and the Judge to come. When Jesus asks who men say “I the Son of man” am, the question already holds part of the answer.

John the Baptist, Elias, Jeremias

The disciples report what they have heard. “Said” is épō, the plain verb for speaking, and the answers are the crowd’s. “Some... some... and others” shows how divided opinion was, and “others” is héteros, other or another.

Some said John the Baptist. Herod had lately put John to death, and his preaching of repentance was fresh in people’s minds, so some thought Jesus was John risen from the dead. Some said Elias, that is Elijah, whom God had promised through Malachi to send “before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD” (Malachi 4:5–6). Elijah had been taken up to heaven without dying, which made his return easy to picture. Others said Jeremias, Jeremiah, the weeping prophet who mourned over Israel’s sin and exile, and Jesus too lamented over Jerusalem. Others again said simply “one of the prophets”, prophētēs, one who speaks for God.

Every one of these answers honours Jesus. People saw God’s authority in his words and his works. Yet each answer counts him as one more messenger in a long line, while he is the one the whole line served. John prepared his way and pointed to him as “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). Elijah was to come before the day of the LORD, and Jesus is the Lord whose coming Elijah announced. Jeremiah wept for the people’s sins, and Jesus carried them: “he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities” (Isaiah 53:4–6). God, who spoke in time past by the prophets, has in these last days spoken to us by his Son (Hebrews 1:1–3), the Word made flesh (John 1:14). Paul says that “the world by wisdom knew not God” (1 Corinthians 1:20–25), and the crowd’s guesses, honourable as they were, show the limit of what people can work out for themselves.

“But whom say ye that I am?”

Then Jesus turns the question on the disciples. “But” is dé, a small joining word that can mark a contrast, and here it sets what men say beside what the twelve say. “Ye” is hymeîs, the plural “you”, spoken to all of them, and the Greek writes it out, so that it stands over against the “men” of verse 13. “Whom” is tís, the ordinary word for “who?”, “say” is légō, to speak, and “am” is eînai, to be. The words are as plain as words can be, and the question is the plainest Jesus could ask.

He asks it of the men who had lived with him, heard his teaching and seen his miracles. The crowd has had its say, and now those who know him best must give their own answer. Peter had answered in much the same words once before, when many disciples turned back and Jesus asked the twelve whether they would go too: “Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life. And we believe and are sure that thou art that Christ, the Son of the living God” (John 6:67–69).

The rest of the New Testament ties salvation to this same confession: “That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved” (Romans 10:9–10), and “Whosoever shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwelleth in him, and he in God” (1 John 4:15). Jesus’ question to the twelve is the question every person meets in the Gospel, and our whole relationship with God turns on the answer.

Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God

Simon Peter answers, speaking first and for the others. His answer has two parts, and each one says something the crowd’s answers missed.

The Christ

“Christ” is Christós, the anointed one, from the verb chrio, to anoint. It is the Greek for the Hebrew Mashiach, Messiah. In the Old Testament prophets, priests and kings were anointed for their work. Peter confesses that Jesus is the one Israel had waited for, the anointed Deliverer in whom all God’s promises come true, prophet, priest and king in one. Peter later preached “how God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power” (Acts 10:38). His anointing was with the Spirit, for the work of all three offices.

The Son of the living God

“Son of God” could describe Israel’s king, as in the psalm, “Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee” (Psalm 2:7). Peter’s words, joined to “the living God”, say something greater: Jesus is God’s Son in a way that belongs to him alone. “Living” is záō, to live or be alive. The living God is the God of Israel, alive and at work, set against the dead idols of the nations, and at Caesarea Philippi, among the shrines, that title carried its full weight.

The Father bears witness to this Sonship again and again. The angel told Mary, “that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God” (Luke 1:35). At Jesus’ baptism a voice from heaven said, “This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased” (Matthew 3:17), and at the transfiguration, in the next chapter, the same voice added, “hear ye him” (Matthew 17:5). He was “declared to be the Son of God with power... by the resurrection from the dead” (Romans 1:4).

The Son is the Word who was with God and was God, by whom all things were made (John 1:1–3). He is “the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person” (Hebrews 1:3), “the image of the invisible God”, by whom all things in heaven and earth were created (Colossians 1:15–17). John writes, “No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him” (John 1:18), and so Jesus could say, “he that hath seen me hath seen the Father” (John 14:9). He is “the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6), and after his resurrection he said, “All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth” (Matthew 28:18). That is who Peter confessed.

The confession comes at the turning point of Matthew’s Gospel. From here Jesus begins to show his disciples that he must suffer, be killed and be raised again the third day (Matthew 16:21), and they will need all of verse 16 to bear what follows.

Where Peter’s confession came from

Jesus answers with a blessing: “Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona.” makários means blessed or happy, and here it marks Peter as a man God has favoured. “Barjona” means son of Jona, Peter’s family name, the name of the man as he was born. Jesus calls him blessed for what he has received, and then he names the giver.

“Flesh and blood” is a common Hebrew way of speaking of human beings in their natural state, frail, mortal and limited. sárx, flesh, here stands for human nature with its earthly view of things. Every human source, Peter’s own mind included, is set aside, and Peter learned this from God. “Revealed” is apokalýptō, to take off the cover, and so to reveal or disclose. The truth had been there in Jesus’ words and works all along, and the Father took the cover off it for Peter. Jesus calls God “my Father which is in heaven” in the same breath in which Peter has called him the Son of God.

The rest of Scripture speaks of this revealing in the same way. “But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God” (1 Corinthians 2:10–14). Jesus said of those who come to him, “they shall be all taught of God” (John 6:45), and Paul writes that saving faith is “the gift of God” (Ephesians 2:8). John says, “the Son of God is come, and hath given us an understanding, that we may know him that is true” (1 John 5:20).

Peter is blessed because he has seen what prophets and kings longed to see. Jesus told his disciples, “Blessed are the eyes which see the things that ye see” (Luke 10:23–24), and he blessed “they that hear the word of God, and keep it” (Luke 11:28). Jesus is himself the Father’s revelation. In him the invisible God is made known, and to know him is to know the Father.

God makes his Son known to his people today in the same way. The Holy Spirit opens the Scriptures to believers, through prayer, through reading and meditating on the Word, and through the teaching of the church, and Jesus promised that the Spirit of truth “will guide you into all truth” (John 16:13). It is a mercy worth noticing that the man the Father chose for this was Peter, quick to speak and quick to stumble, as the next verses show.

Upon this rock I will build my church

“And I say also unto thee” begins with kagṓ, “and I”. Peter has said, “Thou art the Christ”, and Jesus answers with a “thou art” of his own: “thou art Peter.” He had given Simon this name at their first meeting: “Thou art Simon the son of Jona: thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, A stone” (John 1:42). Now he gives the name its weight.

“Peter” is Pétros, a stone or piece of rock, and “rock” is pétra, a great rock, bedrock or a cliff. The two words are related forms, and Jesus’ words play on them. In the Old Testament the rock is a picture of God’s own strength and faithfulness: “He is the Rock, his work is perfect” (Deuteronomy 32:4).

“I will build my church” names the builder and the owner. The church belongs to Christ, and he builds it. “Church” is ekklēsía, an assembly or congregation. The word is made from ek, out of, and kaléō, to call, and in Greek cities it named the citizens’ assembly, duly summoned for public business. In the Greek Old Testament it often stood for the Hebrew qahal, the assembly of Israel. This is the first time Jesus names the community he is gathering: his own people, new and yet joined to God’s people of old.

“I will build” looks ahead, and the building goes on. Paul tells believers, “ye are God’s building” (1 Corinthians 3:9), and says they are “builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit” (Ephesians 2:22). Christ is the head of this body, “the beginning, the firstborn from the dead” (Colossians 1:18).

What is “this rock”?

Believers differ on what the rock is, and three readings have a long history.

  • Peter himself. On this reading Jesus has just named him Peter, the play on words points straight at him, and the next verse gives the keys to him. Some who read it this way hold that Peter was the first of a line of leaders who follow him in the church.
  • Peter’s confession, or Christ whom he confessed. On this reading the rock is the truth Peter has just spoken, that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the living God, or Christ himself, the one that truth is about. Those who read it so point out that pétra is a great mass of rock while Peter’s name means a stone, and they rest on Paul’s words: “For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ” (1 Corinthians 3:11).
  • Peter as the first stone laid. On this reading Peter is a foundation stone together with the other apostles, for the church is “built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone” (Ephesians 2:20), and Christ is the “chief corner stone” God lays in Sion (1 Peter 2:6).

All three agree on what Jesus says plainly. The church is his, he builds it, and the gates of hell will lose against it.

How can the rock be called Satan a few verses later?

Matthew records the blessing and the rebuke side by side and lets both stand. Once Jesus began to speak of his death, Peter rebuked him, and Jesus answered, “Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men” (Matthew 16:21–23). The man who had just spoken by the Father’s revealing now spoke as flesh and blood. Whatever the rock is, the church’s safety rests on the one who said “I will build”, and on his word.

The gates of hell

“The gates of hell” is pylai háidou in Greek, the gates of Hades, and the BSB renders it so. It is the unseen realm where the departed are, and the final place of punishment has a word of its own. In Israel a city’s gates were the seat of its strength and defence, where its decisions were made. So “the gates of hell” stands for the whole power of death and the grave, and of the forces of evil that serve it.

“Prevail against” is katischýō, to overpower or be strong against. The promise is that these powers will lose their fight with the church Christ builds. Death will be unable to hold his people, and persecution and every scheme of the enemy will fail to destroy them. Gates are built to defend a city, so the picture also shows the church on the move and the powers of death unable to hold out against it.

Christ has already won this victory in his own body. God raised him up, “having loosed the pains of death: because it was not possible that he should be holden of it” (Acts 2:24), and the risen Lord says, “I am he that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death” (Revelation 1:18). “The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death” (1 Corinthians 15:26). The church stands because its Lord lives.

The keys of the kingdom of heaven

Jesus goes on, “And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven.” A key, kleís, from a verb meaning to shut, is what opens and shuts. In Israel a chief steward held the keys of a house or a city and managed its affairs for his master. Isaiah speaks of Eliakim receiving that authority: “And the key of the house of David will I lay upon his shoulder; so he shall open, and none shall shut; and he shall shut, and none shall open” (Isaiah 22:22). The keys are a steward’s authority over what belongs to another, to open the way in or to close it.

Peter used these keys first. On the day of Pentecost he preached, and “the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls” (Acts 2:41), and at the house of Cornelius he saw the Holy Ghost fall on Gentiles and had them baptized (Acts 10:44–48). So the door of faith was opened through his preaching, first to the Jews and then to the Gentiles, and through the church’s preaching of the gospel it stands open to all who believe.

The keys remain Christ’s own. He is the door (John 10:9), he is “he that hath the key of David, he that openeth, and no man shutteth; and shutteth, and no man openeth” (Revelation 3:7), and God “gave him to be the head over all things to the church, which is his body” (Ephesians 1:22–23). Peter holds the keys as Christ’s steward.

Binding and loosing

“Bind” is déō, to tie, bind or fasten, and “loose” is lýō, to loosen or untie. Jewish teachers used these two words as legal terms. To bind (asar) was to declare a thing forbidden, or to put someone out of the community, and to loose (hittir) was to declare it permitted, or to release someone. Jesus’ hearers would have understood him to be giving authority to declare what God forbids and permits, and who belongs among his people.

What is bound and loosed on earth “shall be bound in heaven” and “shall be loosed in heaven”. The two halves of the verse match each other, and heaven stands behind both. Later Jesus says the same words to all the disciples (Matthew 18:18), and after his resurrection he tells them, “Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained” (John 20:23). So the authority given to Peter here is given with him to the church, in its teaching, its discipline and its declaring of forgiveness.

Can the church bind and loose whatever it likes?

The church’s authority is to declare on earth what agrees with God’s revealed will, according to Scripture and under the Holy Spirit. What it binds and looses is confirmed in heaven when it matches what God has already declared there. Its work is to discern and apply God’s truth in doctrine, in conduct and in discipline, and the making of new truth lies outside it.

Why did Jesus tell them to tell no man?

Jesus was guarding the name “Christ” until he had shown what kind of Christ he is. “Charged” is diastéllomai, a strong word for giving an order, and the disciples, mathētḗs, learners or pupils, are to tell “no man”, mēdeís, no one at all, “that he was Jesus the Christ”. “Christ” here is the title, Christós, and it is the title they must keep to themselves.

The people of Israel lived under Roman rule, and most hoped for a Messiah who would be a conquering son of David, throw off Rome and restore Israel’s kingdom, reading promises such as “the government shall be upon his shoulder” and “upon the throne of David” (Isaiah 9:6–7) in that light. Once a crowd was ready to “take him by force, to make him a king”, and Jesus withdrew into a mountain alone (John 6:15). Had the disciples announced him as the Christ now, the name would have been heard as a call to revolt, Rome’s power would have been drawn against him before his time, and his true work would have been hidden behind it.

The very next verse shows why. “From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day” (Matthew 16:21). The Christ must first be the suffering servant, “brought as a lamb to the slaughter” (Isaiah 53:1–12), and Peter himself could hardly bear to hear it. The disciples knew the name, and they had still to learn what it meant.

This silence is often called the “Messianic secret”, and it appears again and again in the Gospels, where Jesus tells people to keep quiet about who he is or what he has done. It lasted until the cross and the empty tomb. At Pentecost the same Peter stood up and said, “Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ” (Acts 2:36). The one who “humbled himself, and became obedient unto death” has been given “a name which is above every name” (Philippians 2:6–11). The command of verse 20 was for its time, and the time came.

The Christ who asks and the church he keeps

These verses set Jesus’ own question before everyone who reads them: “But whom say ye that I am?” People’s answers vary now as they did at Caesarea Philippi, and the answer that saves is still Peter’s, “Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.”

Wherever someone makes that confession truly, the Father has been at work. Peter was blessed because God showed him the truth, and every believer who confesses Jesus has received the same gift by the same grace.

The church rests on Christ and belongs to him. He is building it still, out of people who confess him, and his promise stands that “the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” Its keys open the kingdom through the gospel, and its authority is his, held in trust.

The Christ who once told his disciples to keep quiet has since been proclaimed Lord and Christ to Israel and to the world. If you can say with Peter who Jesus is, that knowledge came to you from your Father in heaven, and it is a blessing to rest in.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Matthew 16:13–20. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 8 verses
Passage under commentMatthew 16:13–20
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

We have here a private conference which Christ had with his disciples concerning himself. It was in the coasts of Cesarea Philippi, the utmost borders of the land of Canaan northward; there in that remote corner, perhaps, there was less flocking after him than in other places, which gave him leisure for this private conversation with his disciples. Note, When ministers are abridged in their public work, they should endeavour to do the more in their own families.

Christ is here catechising his disciples.

I.He enquires what the opinions of others were concerning him; Who do men say that I, the Son of man, am?

1.He calls himself the Son of man; which may be taken either,

(1.)As a title common to him with others. He was called, and justly, the Son of God, for so he was (Luke i. 35); but he called himself the Son of man; for he is really and truly "Man, made of a woman." In courts of honour, it is a rule to distinguish men by their highest titles; but Christ, having now emptied himself, though he was the Son of God, will be known by the style and title of the Son of man. Ezekiel was often so called to keep him humble; Christ called himself so, to show that he was humble. Or,

(2.)As a title peculiar to him as Mediator. He is made known, in Daniel's vision, as the Son of man, Dan. vii. 13. I am the Messiah, that Son of man that was promised. But,

2.He enquires what people's sentiments were concerning him: "Who do men say that I am? The Son of man?" (So I think it might better be read). "Do they own me for the Messiah?" He asks not, "Who do the scribes and Pharisees say that I am?" They were prejudiced against him, and said that he was a deceiver and in league with Satan; but, "Who do men say that I am?" He referred to the common people, whom the Pharisees despised. Christ asked this question, not as one that knew not; for if he knows what men think, much more what they say; nor as one desirous to hear his own praises, but to make the disciples solicitous concerning the success of their preaching, by showing that he himself was so. The common people conversed more familiarly with the disciples than they did with their Master, and therefore from them he might better know what they said. Christ had not plainly said who he was, but left people to infer it from his works, John x. 24, 25. Now he would know what inferences the people drew from them, and from the miracles which his apostles wrought in his name.

3.To this question the disciples have him an answer (v. 14), Some say, thou art John the Baptist, &c. There were some that said, he was the Son of David (ch. xii. 23), and the great Prophet, John vi. 14. The disciples, however, do not mention that opinion, but only such opinions as were wide of the truth, which they gathered up from their countrymen. Observe,

(1.)They are different opinions; some say one thing, and others another. Truth is one; but those who vary from that commonly vary one from another. Thus Christ came eventually to send division, Luke xii. 51. Being so noted a Person, every one would be ready to pass his verdict upon him, and, "Many men, many minds;" those that were not willing to own him to be the Christ, wandered in endless mazes, and followed the chase of every uncertain guess and wild hypothesis.

(2.)They are honourable opinions, and bespeak the respect they had for him, according to the best of their judgment. These were not the sentiments of his enemies, but the sober thoughts of those that followed him with love and wonder. Note, It is possible for men to have good thoughts of Christ, and yet not right ones, a high opinion of him, and yet not high enough.

(3.)They all suppose him to be one risen from the dead; which perhaps arose from a confused notion they had of the resurrection of the Messiah, before his public preaching, as of Jonas. Or their notions arose from an excessive value for antiquity; as if it were not possible for an excellent man to be produced in their own age, but it must be one of the ancients returned to life again.

(4.)They are all false opinions, built upon mistakes, and wilful mistakes. Christ's doctrines and miracles bespoke him to be an extraordinary Person; but because of the meanness of his appearance, so different from what they expected, they would not own him to be the Messiah, but will grant him to be any thing rather than that.

[1.]Some say, thou art John the Baptist. Herod said so (ch. xiv. 2), and those about him would be apt to say as he said. This notion might be strengthened by an opinion they had, that those who died as martyrs, should rise again before others; which some think the second of the seven sons refers to, in his answer to Antiochus, 2 Macc. vii. 9, The King of the world shall raise us up, who have died for his laws, unto everlasting life.

[2.]Some Elias; taking occasion, no doubt, from the prophecy of Malachi (ch. iv. 5), Behold, I will send you Elijah. And the rather, because Elijah (as Christ) did many miracles, and was himself, in his translation, the greatest miracle of all.

[3.]Others Jeremias: they fasten upon him, either because he was the weeping prophet, and Christ was often in tears; or because God had set him over the kingdoms and nations (Jer. i. 10), which they thought agreed with their notion of the Messiah.

[4.]Or, one of the prophets. This shows what an honourable idea they entertained of the prophets; and yet they were the children of them that persecuted and slew them, ch. xxiii. 29. Rather than they would allow Jesus of Nazareth, one of their own country, to be such an extraordinary Person as his works bespoke him to be, they would say, "It was not he, but one of the old prophets."

II.He enquires what their thoughts were concerning him; "But who say ye that I am? v.

15. Ye tell me what other people say of me; can ye say better?" 1. The disciples had themselves been better taught than others; had, by their intimacy with Christ, greater advantages of getting knowledge than others had. Note, It is justly expected that those who enjoy greater plenty of the means of knowledge and grace than others, should have a more clear and distinct knowledge of the things of God than others. Those who have more acquaintance with Christ than others, should have truer sentiments concerning him, and be able to give a better account of him than others. 2. The disciples were trained up to teach others, and therefore it was highly requisite that they should understand the truth themselves: "Ye that are to preach the gospel of the kingdom, what are your notions of him that sent you?" Note, Ministers must be examined before they be sent forth, especially what their sentiments are of Christ, and who they say that he is; for how can they be owned as ministers of Christ, that are either ignorant or erroneous concerning Christ? This is a question we should every one of us be frequently putting to ourselves, "Who do we say, what kind of one do we say, that the Lord Jesus is? Is he precious to us? Is he in our eyes the chief of ten thousand? Is he the Beloved of our souls?" It is well or ill with us, according as our thoughts are right or wrong concerning Jesus Christ.

Well, this is the question; now let us observe,

(1.)Peter's answer to this question, v. 16. To the former question concerning the opinion others had of Christ, several of the disciples answered, according as they had heard people talk; but to this Peter answers in the name of all the rest, they all consenting to it, and concurring in it. Peter's temper led him to be forward in speaking upon all such occasions, and sometimes he spoke well, sometimes amiss; in all companies there are found some warm, bold men, to whom a precedency of speech falls of course; Peter was such a one: yet we find other of the apostles sometimes speaking as the mouth of the rest; as John (Mark ix. 38), Thomas, Philip, and Jude, John xiv. 5, 8, 22. So that this is far from being a proof of such primacy and superiority of Peter above the rest of the apostles, as the church of Rome ascribes to him. They will needs advance him to be a judge, when the utmost they can make of him, is, that he was but foreman of the jury, to speak for the rest, and that only pro hâc vice—for this once; not the perpetual dictator or speaker of the house, only chairman upon this occasion.

Peter's answer is short, but it is full, and true, and to the purpose; Thou art the Christ, the Son of the Living God. Here is a confession of the Christian faith, addressed to Christ, and so made an act of devotion. Here is a confession of the true God as the living God, in opposition to dumb and dead idols, and of Jesus Christ, whom he hath sent, whom to know is life eternal. This is the conclusion of the whole matter.

[1.]The people called him a Prophet, that Prophet (John vi. 14); but the disciples own him to be the Christ, the anointed One; the great Prophet, Priest, and King of the church; the true Messiah promised to the fathers, and depended on by them as He that shall come. It was a great thing to believe this concerning one whose outward appearance was so contrary to the general idea the Jews had of the Messiah.

[2.]He called himself the Son of Man; but they owned him to be the Son of the living God. The people's notion of him was, that he was the ghost of a dead man, Elias, or Jeremias; but they know and believe him to be the Son of the living God, who has life in himself, and has given to his Son to have life in himself, and to be the Life of the world. If he be the Son of the living God, he is of the same nature with him: and though his divine nature was now veiled with the cloud of flesh, yet there were those who looked through it, and saw his glory, the glory as of the Only-Begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth. Now can we with an assurance of faith subscribe to this confession? Let us then, with a fervency of affection and adoration, go to Christ, and tell him so; Lord Jesus, thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.

(2.)Christ's approbation of his answer (v. 17-19); in which Peter is replied to, both as a believer and as an apostle.

[1.]As a believer, v. 17. Christ shows himself well pleased with Peter's confession, that it was so clear and express, without ifs or ands, as we say. Note, The proficiency of Christ's disciples in knowledge and grace is very acceptable to him; and Christ shows him whence he received the knowledge of this truth. At the first discovery of this truth in the dawning of the gospel day, it was a mighty thing to believe it; all men had not this knowledge, had not this faith. But,

First, Peter had the happiness of it; Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jona. He reminds him of his rise and original, the meanness of his parentage, the obscurity of his extraction; he was Bar-jonas—The son of a dove; so some. Let him remember the rock out of which he was hewn, that he may see he was not born to this dignity, but preferred to it by the divine favour; it was free grace that made him to differ. Those that have received the Spirit must remember who is their Father, 1 Sam. x. 12. Having reminded him of this, he makes him sensible of his great happiness as a believer; Blessed art thou. Note, True believers are truly blessed, and those are blessed indeed whom Christ pronounces blessed; his saying they are so, makes them so. "Peter, thou art a happy man, who thus knowest the joyful sound," Ps. lxxxix. 15. Blessed are your eyes, ch. xiii. 16. All happiness attends the right knowledge of Christ.

Secondly, God must have the glory of it; "For flesh and blood have not revealed it to thee. Thou hadst this neither by the invention of thy own wit and reason, nor by the instruction and information of others; this light sprang neither from nature nor from education, but from my Father who is in heaven." Note, 1. The Christian religion is a revealed religion, has its rise in heaven; it is a religion from above, given by inspiration of God, not the learning of philosophers, nor the politics of statesmen. 2. Saving faith is the gift of God, and, wherever it is, is wrought by him, as the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, for his sake, and upon the score of his mediation, Phil. i. 29. Therefore thou art blessed, because my Father has revealed it to thee. Note, The revealing of Christ to us and in us is a distinguishing token of God's good will, and a firm foundation of true happiness; and blessed are they that are thus highly favoured.

Perhaps Christ discerned something of pride and vain-glory in Peter's confession; a subtle sin, and which is apt to mingle itself even with our good duties. It is hard for good men to compare themselves with others, and not to have too great a conceit of themselves; to prevent which, we should consider that our preference to others is no achievement of our own, but the free gift of God's grace too us, and not to others; so that we have nothing to boast of, Ps. cxv. 1; 1 Cor. iv. 7.

[2.]Christ replies to him as an apostle or minister, v. 18, 19. Peter, in the name of the church, had confessed Christ, and to him therefore the promise intended for the church is directed. Note, There is nothing lost by being forward to confess Christ; for those who honour him, he will honour.

Upon occasion of this great confession made of Christ, which is the church's homage and allegiance, he signed and published this royal, this divine charter, by which that body politic is incorporated. Such is the communion between Christ and the church, the Bridegroom and the spouse. God had a church in the world from the beginning, and it was built upon the rock of the promised Seed, Gen. iii. 15. But now, that promised Seed being come, it was requisite that the church should have a new charter, as Christian, and standing in relation to a Christ already come. Now here we have that charter; and a thousand pities it is, that this word, which is the great support of the kingdom of Christ, should be wrested and pressed into the service of antichrist. But the devil has employed his subtlety to pervert it, as he did that promise, Ps. xci. 11, which he perverted to his own purpose, ch. iv. 6, and perhaps both that scripture and this he thus perverted because they stood in his way, and therefore he owed them a spite.

Now the purport of this charter is,

First, To establish the being of the church; I say also unto thee. It is Christ that makes the grant, he who is the church's Head, and Ruler, to whom all judgment is committed, and from whom all power is derived; he who makes it pursuant to the authority received from the Father, and his undertaking for the salvation of the elect. The grant is put into Peter's hand; "I say it to thee." The Old Testament promises relating to the church were given immediately to particular persons, eminent for faith and holiness, as to Abraham and David; which yet gave no supremacy to them, much less to any of their successors; so the New-Testament charter is here delivered to Peter as an agent, but to the use and behoof of the church in all ages, according to the purposes therein specified and contained. Now it is here promised,

1.That Christ would build his church upon a rock. This body politic is incorporated by the style and title of Christ's church. It is a number o the children of men called out of the world, and set apart from it, and dedicated to Christ. It is not thy church, but mine. Peter remembered this, when he cautioned ministers not to lord it over God's heritage. The church is Christ's peculiar, appropriated to him. The world is God's, and they that dwell therein; but the church is a chosen remnant, that stands in relation to God through Christ as Mediator. It bears him image and superscription.

(1.)The Builder and Maker of the church is Christ himself; I will build it. The church is a temple which Christ is the Builder of, Zech. vi. 11-13. Herein Solomon was a type of Christ, and Cyrus, Isa. xliv. 28. The materials and workmanship are his. By the working of his Spirit with the preaching of his word he adds souls to his church, and so builds it up with living stones, 1 Pet. ii. 5. Ye are God's building; and building is a progressive work; the church in this world is but in fieri—in the forming, like a house in the building. It is a comfort to all those who wish well to the church, that Christ, who has divine wisdom and power, undertakes to build it.

(2.)The foundation on which it is built is, this Rock. Let the architect do his part ever so well, if the foundation be rotten, the building will not stand; let us therefore see what the foundation is, and it must be meant of Christ, for other foundation can no man lay. See Isa. xxviii. 16.

[1.]The church is built upon a rock; a firm, strong, and lasting foundation, which time will not waste, nor will it sink under the weight of the building. Christ would not build his house upon the sand, for he knew that storms would arise. A rock is high, Ps. lxi. 2. Christ's church does not stand upon a level with this world; a rock is large, and extends far, so does the church's foundation; and the more large, the more firm; those are not the church's friends that narrow its foundation.

[2.]It is built upon this rock; thou art Peter, which signifies a stone or rock; Christ gave him that name when he first called him (John i. 42), and here he confirms it; "Peter, thou dost answer thy name, thou art a solid, substantial disciple, fixed and stayed, and one that there is some hold of. Peter is thy name, and strength and stability are with thee. Thou art not shaken with the waves of men's fluctuating opinions concerning me, but established in the present truth," 2 Pet. i. 12. From the mention of this significant name, occasion is taken for this metaphor of building upon a rock.

First, Some by this rock understand Peter himself as an apostle, the chief, though not the prince, of the twelve, senior among them, but not superior over them. The church is built upon the foundation of the apostles, Eph. ii. 20. The first stones of that building were laid in and by their ministry; hence their names are said to be written in the foundations of the new Jerusalem, Rev. xxi. 14. Now Peter being that apostle by whose hand the first stones of the church were laid, both in Jewish converts (Acts ii.), and in the Gentile converts (Acts x.), he might in some sense be said to be the rock on which it was built. Cephas was one that seemed to be a pillar, Gal. ii. 9. But it sounds very harsh, to call a man that only lays the first stone of a building, which is a transient act, the foundation on which it is built, which is an abiding thing. Yet if it were so, this would not serve to support the pretensions of the Bishop of Rome; for Peter had no such headship as he claims, much less could he derive it to his successors, least of all to the Bishops of Rome, who, whether they are so in place or no, is a question, but that they are not so in the truth of Christianity, is past all question.

Secondly, Others, by this rock, understand Christ; "Thou art Peter, thou hast the name of a stone, but upon this rock, pointing to himself, I will build my church." Perhaps he laid his hand on his breast, as when he said, Destroy this temple (John ii. 19), when he spoke of the temple of his body. Then he took occasion from the temple, where he was, so to speak of himself, and gave occasion to some to misunderstand him of that; so here he took occasion from Peter, to speak of himself as the Rock, and gave occasion to some to misunderstand him of Peter. But this must be explained by those many scriptures which speak of Christ as the only Foundation of the church; see 1 Cor. iii. 11; 1 Pet. ii. 6. Christ is both its Founder and its Foundation; he draws souls, and draws them to himself; to him they are united, and on him they rest and have a constant dependence.

Thirdly, Others by this rock understand this confession which Peter made of Christ, and this comes all to one with understanding it of Christ himself. It was a good confession which Peter witnessed, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God; the rest concurred with him in it. "Now," saith Christ, "this is that great truth upon which I will build my church." 1. Take away this truth itself, and the universal church falls to the ground. If Christ be not the Son of God, Christianity is a cheat, and the church is a mere chimera; our preaching is vain, your faith is vain, and you are yet in your sins, 1 Cor. xv. 14-17. If Jesus be not the Christ, those that own him are not of the church, but deceivers and deceived. 2. Take away the faith and confession of this truth from any particular church, and it ceases to be a part of Christ's church, and relapses to the state and character of infidelity. This is articulus stantis et cadentis ecclesia—that article, with the admission or the denial of which the church either rises or falls; "the main hinge on which the door of salvation turns;" those who let go this, do not hold the foundation; and though they may call themselves Christians, they give themselves the lie; for the church is a sacred society, incorporated upon the certainty and assurance of this great truth; and great it is, and has prevailed.

2.Christ here promises to preserve and secure his church, when it is built; The gates of hell shall not prevail against it; neither against this truth, nor against the church which is built upon it.

(1.)This implies that the church has enemies that fight against it, and endeavour its ruin overthrow, here represented by the gates of hell, that is, the city of hell; (which is directly opposite to this heavenly city, this city of the living God), the devil's interest among the children of men. The gates of hell are the powers and policies of the devil's kingdom, the dragon's head and horns, by which he makes war with the Lamb; all that comes out of hell-gates, as being hatched and contrived there. These fight against the church by opposing gospel truths, corrupting gospel ordinances, persecuting good ministers and good Christians; drawing or driving, persuading by craft or forcing by cruelty, to that which is inconsistent with the purity of religion; this is the design of the gates of hell, to root out the name of Christianity (Ps. lxxxiii. 4), to devour the man-child (Rev. xii. 9), to raze this city to the ground.

(2.)This assures us that the enemies of the church shall not gain their point. While the world stands, Christ will have a church in it, in which his truths and ordinances shall be owned and kept up, in spite of all the opposition of the powers of darkness; They shall not prevail against it, Ps. cxxix. 1, 2. This gives no security to any particular church, or church-governors that they shall never err, never apostatize or be destroyed; but that somewhere or other the Christian religion shall have a being, though not always in the same degree of purity and splendour, yet so as that the entail of it shall never be quite cut off. The woman lives, though in a wilderness (Rev. xii. 14), cast down but not destroyed (2 Cor. iv. 9). Corruptions grieving, persecutions grievous, but neither fatal. The church may be foiled in particular encounters, but in the main battle it shall come off more than a conqueror. Particular believers are kept by the power of God, through faith, unto salvation, 1 Pet. i. 5.

Secondly, The other part of this charter is, to settle the order and government of the church, v. 19. When a city or society is incorporated, officers are appointed and empowered to act for the common good. A city without government is a chaos. Now this constituting of the government of the church, is here expressed by the delivering of the keys, and, with them, a power to bind and loose. This is not to be understood of any peculiar power that Peter was invested with, as if he were sole door-keeper of the kingdom of heaven, and had that key of David which belongs only to the Son of David; no, this invests all the apostles and their successors with a ministerial power to guide and govern the church of Christ, as it exists in particular congregations or churches, according to the rules of the gospel. Claves regni cælorum in B. Petro apostolo cuncti suscepimus sacerdotes—All we that are priests, received, in the person of the blessed apostle Peter, the keys of the kingdom of heaven; so Ambrose De Dignit. Sacerd. Only the keys were first put into Peter's hand, because he was the first that opened the door of faith to the Gentiles, Acts x. 28. As the king, in giving a charter to a corporation, empowers the magistrates to hold courts in his name, to try matters of fact, and determine therein according to law, confirming what is so done regularly as if done in any of the superior courts; so Christ, having incorporated his church, hath appointed the office of the ministry for the keeping up of order and government, and to see that his laws be duly served; I will give thee the keys. He doth not say, "I have given them," or "I do now;" but "I will do it," meaning after his resurrection; when he ascended on high, he gave those gifts, Ephes. iv. 8; then this power was actually given, not to Peter only, but to all the rest, ch. xxviii. 19, 20; John xx. 21. He doth not say, The keys shall be given, but, I will give them; for ministers derive their authority from Christ, and all their power is to be used in his name, 1 Cor. v. 4.

Now, 1. The power here delegated is a spiritual power; it is a power pertaining to the kingdom of heaven, that is, to the church, that part of it which is militant here on earth, to the gospel dispensation; that is it about which the apostolical and ministerial power is wholly conversant. It is not any civil, secular power that is hereby conveyed, Christ's kingdom is not of this world; their instructions afterward were in things pertaining to the kingdom of God, Acts i. 3.

2.It is the power of the keys that is given, alluding to the custom of investing men with authority in such a place, by delivering to them the keys of the place. Or as the master of the house gives the keys to the steward, the keys of the stores where the provisions are kept, that he may give to every one in the house his portion of meat in due season (Luke xii. 42), and deny it as there is occasion, according to the rules of the family. Ministers are stewards, 1 Cor. iv. 1; Tit. i. 7. Eliakim, who had the key of the house of David, was over the household, Isa. xxii. 22.

3.It is a power to bind and loose, that is (following the metaphor of the keys), to shut and open. Joseph, who was lord of Pharaoh's house, and steward of the stores, had power to bind his princes, and to teach his senators wisdom, Ps. cv. 21, 22. When the stores and treasures of the house are shut up from any, they are bound, interdico tibi aquâ et igne—I forbid thee the use of fire and water; when they are opened to them again, they are loosed from that bond, are discharged from the censure, and restored to their liberty.

4.It is a power which Christ has promised to own the due administration of; he will ratify the sentences of his stewards with his own approbation; It shall be bound in heaven, and loosed in heaven: not that Christ hath hereby obliged himself to confirm all church-censures, right or wrong; but such as are duly passed according to the word, clave non errante—the key turning the right way, such are sealed in heaven; that is, the word of the gospel, in the mouth of faithful ministers, is to be looked upon, not as the word of man, but as the word of God, and to be received accordingly, 1 Thess. ii. 13; John xii. 20.

Now the keys of the kingdom of heaven are,

(1.)The key of doctrine, called the key of knowledge. "Your business shall be to explain to the world the will of God, both as to truth and duty; and for this you shall have your commissions, credentials, and full instructions to bind and loose:" these, in the common speech of the Jews, at that time, signified to prohibit and permit; to teach or declare a thing to be unlawful was to bind; to be lawful, was to loose. Now the apostles had an extraordinary power of this kind; some things forbidden by the law of Moses were now to be allowed, as the eating of such and such meats; some things allowed there were now to be forbidden, as divorce; and the apostles were empowered to declare this to the world, and men might take it upon their words. When Peter was first taught himself, and then taught others, to call nothing common or unclean, this power was exercised. There is also an ordinary power hereby conveyed to all ministers, to preach the gospel as appointed officers; to tell people, in God's name, and according to the scriptures, what is good, and what the Lord requires of them: and they who declare the whole counsel of God, use these keys well, Acts xx. 27.

Some make the giving of the keys to allude to the custom of the Jews in creating a doctor of the law, which was to put into his hand the keys of the chest where the book of the law was kept, denoting his being authorized to take and read it; and the binding and loosing, to allude to the fashion about their books, which were in rolls; they shut them by binding them up with a string, which they untied when they opened them. Christ gives his apostles power to shut or open the book of the gospel to people, as the case required. See the exercise of this power, Acts xiii. 46; xviii. 6. When ministers preach pardon and peace to the penitent, wrath and the curse to the impenitent, in Christ's name, they act then pursuant to this authority of binding and loosing.

(2.)The key of discipline, which is but the application of the former to particular persons, upon a right estimate of their characters and actions. It is not legislative power that is hereby conferred, but judicial; the judge doth not make the law, but only declares what is law, and upon an impartial enquiry into the merits of the cause, gives sentence accordingly. Such is the power of the keys, wherever it is lodged, with reference to church-membership and the privileges thereof.

[1.]Christ's ministers have a power to admit into the church; "Go, disciple all nations, baptizing them; those who profess faith in Christ, and obedience to him, admit them and their seed members of the church by baptism." Ministers are to let in to the wedding-feast those that are bidden; and to keep out such as are apparently unfit for so holy a communion.

[2.]They have a power to expel and cast out such as have forfeited their church-membership, that is binding; refusing to unbelievers the application of gospel promises and the seals of them; and declaring to such as appear to be in the gall of bitterness and bond of iniquity, that they have no part or lot in the matter, as Peter did to Simon Magus, though he had been baptized; and this is a binding over to the judgment of God.

[3.]They have a power to restore and to receive in again, upon their repentance, such as had been thrown out; to loose those whom they had bound; declaring to them, that, if their repentance be sincere, the promise of pardon belongs to them. The apostles had a miraculous gift of discerning spirits; yet even they went by the rule of outward appearances (as Acts viii. 21; 1 Cor. v. 1; 2 Cor. ii. 7; 1 Tim. i. 20), which ministers may still make a judgment upon, if they be skilful and faithful.

Lastly, Here is the charge which Christ gave his disciples, to keep this private for the present (v. 20); They must tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ. What they had professed to him, they must not yet publish to the world, for several reasons; 1. Because this was the time of preparation for his kingdom: the great thing now preached, was, that the kingdom of heaven was at hand; and therefore those things were now to be insisted on, which were proper to make way for Christ; as the doctrine of repentance; not this great truth, in and with which the kingdom of heaven was to be actually set up. Every thing is beautiful in its season, and it is good advice, Prepare thy work, and afterwards build, Prov. xxiv. 27. 2. Christ would have his Messiahship proved by his works, and would rather they should testify of him than that his disciples should, because their testimony was but as his own, which he insisted not on. See John v. 31, 34. He was so secure of the demonstration of his miracles, that he waived other witnesses, John x. 25, 38. 3. If they had known that he was Jesus the Christ, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory, 1 Cor. ii. 8. 4. Christ would not have the apostles preach this, till they had the most convincing evidence ready to allege in confirmation of it. Great truths may suffer damage by being asserted before they can be sufficiently proved. Now the great proof of Jesus being the Christ was his resurrection: by that he was declared to be the Son of God, with power; and therefore the divine wisdom would not have this truth preached, till that could be alleged for proof of it. 5. It was requisite that the preachers of so great a truth should be furnished with greater measures of the Spirit than the apostles as yet had; therefore the open asserting of it was adjourned till the Spirit should be poured out upon them. But when Christ was glorified and the Spirit poured out, we find Peter proclaiming upon the house-tops what was here spoken in a corner (Acts ii. 36), That God hath made this same Jesus both Lord and Christ; for, as there is a time to keep silence, so there is a time to speak.

Historical interpretation

Nine Centuries of Reception

14 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

14 quotes · AD 220–1150
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
200300400500600700800900100011001200

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

d. AD 220TertullianAnte-NiceneSourceScorpiace
Rather is the nature preserved, though the life blushes; nor does Christ know other men than those with reference to whom He says, "Whom do men say that I am? " And, "As ye would that men should do to you, do ye likewise so to, them.
d. AD 220TertullianAnte-NiceneSourceOn Monogamy
Peter alone do I find-through (the mention of) his "mother-in-law" ,-to have been married. Monogamist I am led to presume him by consideration of the Church, which, built upon him, was destined to appoint every grade of her Order from monogamists.
d. AD 253Origen of Alexandriaas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Ante-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
Christ puts this question to His disciples, that from their answer we may learn that there were at that time among the Jews various opinions concerning Christ; and to the end that we should always investigate what opinion men may form of us; that if any ill be said of us, we may cut off the occasions of it; or if any good, we may multiply the occasions of it.
d. AD 355Theodore of HeracleaPost-NiceneSourceFRAGMENT 101.5
Jesus asks this in order that we might know what opinions about him were current among the Jews. [He also asks] so that we might learn to inquire intently into what people are saying about him, and if it is bad, to remove the causes, or if complimentary, to increase them. But he said “Son of man” in order to show that he himself not only appears to be but in fact unchangeably is man, and again, is true God. [It is] not as if he were divided into different species, one part God and one part man; rather one may address him as Son of man with no doubt that this very same one is also the Son of God.
d. AD 367Hilary of Poitiersas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
By asking, Whom do men say that the Son of Man is? He implied that something ought to be thought respecting Him beyond what appeared, for He was the Son of Man. And in thus enquiring after men's opinion respecting Himself, we are not to think that He made confession of Himself; for that which He asked for was something concealed, to which the faith of believers ought to extend itself. We must hold that form of confession, that we so mention the Son of God as not to forget the Son of Man, for the one without the other offers us no hope of salvation; and therefore He said emphatically, Whom do men say that the Son of Man is?

This is the true and unalterable faith, that from God came forth God the Son, who has eternity out of the eternity of the Father. That this God took unto Him a body and was made man is a perfect confession. Thus He embraced all in that He here expresses both His nature and His name, in which is the sum of virtues.

This confession of Peter met a worthy reward, for that he had seen the Son of God in the man. Whence it follows, Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjonas, for flesh and blood has not revealed this unto thee, but my Father who is in heaven.

Otherwise; He is blessed, because to have looked and to have seen beyond human sight is matter of praise, not beholding that which is of flesh and blood, but seeing the Son of God by the revelation of the heavenly Father; and he was held worthy to be the first to acknowledge the divinity which was in Christ.

But in this bestowing of a new name is a happy foundation of the Church, and a rock worthy of that building, which should break up the laws of hell, burst the gates of Tartarus, and all the shackles of death. And to show the firmness of this Church thus built upon a rock, He adds, And the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
d. AD 407John Chrysostomas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Hom. liv.) He adds 'of Philip,' to distinguish it from the other Cæsarea, of Strato. And He asks this question in the former place, leading His disciples far out of the way of the Jews, that being set free from all fear, they might say freely what was in their mind.

He says not, Whom do the Scribes and Pharisees say that I am? but, Whom do men say that I am? searching into the minds of the common people, which were not perverted to evil. For though their opinion concerning Christ was much below what it ought to have been, yet it was free from wilful wickedness; but the opinion of the Pharisees concerning Christ was full of much malice.

The disciples having recounted the opinion of the common people, He then by a second question invites them to higher thoughts concerning Him, and therefore it follows, Jesus saith unto them, Whom say ye that I am? You who are with Me always, and have seen greater miracles than the multitudes, ought not to agree in the opinion of the multitudes. For this reason He did not put this question to them at the commencement of His preaching, but after He had done many signs; then also He spoke many things to them concerning His Deity.

When the Lord enquires concerning the opinion of the multitudes, all the disciples answer; but when all the disciples are asked, Peter as the mouth and head of the Apostles answers for all, as it follows, Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art Christ, the Son of the living God.

It would be without meaning to say, Thou art the son of Jonas, unless he intended to show that Christ is as naturally the Son of God, as Peter is the son of Jonas, that is, of the same substance as him that begot him.

And truly if Peter had not confessed that Christ was in a peculiar sense born of the Father, there had been no need of revelation; nor would he have been worthy of this blessing for confessing Christ to be one of many adopted sons; for before this they who were with Him in the ship had said, Truly thou art the Son of God. (John 1:49.) Nathanael also said, Rabbi, thou art the Son of God. Yet were not these blessed because they did not confess such sonship as does Peter here, but thought Him one among many, not in the true sense a son; or, if chief above all, yet not the substance of the Father. But see how the Father reveals the Son, and the Son the Father; from none other comes it to confess the Son than of the Father, and from none other to confess the Father than of the Son; so that from this place even it is manifest that the Son is of the same substance, and to be worshipped together with the Father. Christ then proceeds to show that many would hereafter believe what Peter had now confessed, whence He adds, And I say unto thee, that thou art Peter,

That is, On this faith and confession I will build my Church. Herein showing that many should believe what Peter had confessed, and raising his understanding, and making him His shepherd.

Then He speaks of another honour of Peter, when He adds, And I will give thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven; as much as to say, As the Father hath given thee to know Me, I also will give something unto thee, namely, the keys of the kingdom of heaven.

See how Christ leads Peter to a high understanding concerning himself. These things that He here promises to give him, belong to God alone, namely to forgive sins, and to make the Church immoveable amidst the storms of so many persecutions and trials.
Wherefore hath he mentioned the founder of the city? Because there was another besides, Caesarea Stratonis. But not in that, but in this doth He ask them, leading them far away from the Jews, so that being freed from all alarm, they might speak with boldness all that was in their mind.

And wherefore did He not ask them at once their own opinion, but that of the people? In order that when they had told the people's opinion, and then were asked, "But whom say ye that I am?" by the manner of His inquiry they might be led up to a sublimer notion, and not fall into the same low view as the multitude. Accordingly He asks them not at all in the beginning of His preaching, but when He had done many miracles, and had discoursed with them of many and high doctrines, and had afforded so many clear proofs of His Godhead, and of His unanimity with the Father, then He puts this question to them.

And He said not, "Whom say the Scribes and Pharisees that I am?" often as these had come unto Him, and discoursed with Him; but, "Whom do men say that I am?" inquiring after the judgment of the people, as unbiassed. For though it was far meaner than it should be, yet was it free from malice, but the other was teeming with much wickedness.

And signifying how earnestly He desires His Economy to be confessed, He saith, "The Son of Man;" thereby denoting His Godhead, which He doth also in many other places. For He saith, "No man hath ascended up to Heaven, but the Son of Man, which is in Heaven." And again, "But when ye shall see the Son of Man ascend up, where He was before."
d. AD 420JeromePost-NiceneSourceCommentary on Matthew
(Verse 13) And Jesus came into the parts of Caesarea Philippi. This Philip is the brother of Herod, about whom we spoke before, the tetrarch of Ituraea and Trachonitis regions, who built Caesarea, which is now called Paneas, in honor of Tiberius Caesar, and in honor of Caesar, and also named it after himself, Caesarea Philippi, and it is in the province of Phoenicia. He imitated his father Herod, who named Caesarea in honor of August Caesar, which was formerly called the Tower of Straton. And he built, in the name of his daughter Julia, across the Jordan. This place (which is also called Ille) is Caesarea Philippi, where the Jordan River originates at the foot of Mount Lebanon, and it has two springs, one called Jor and the other Dan, which, when mixed together, become the Jordan River.

And he asked his disciples, saying: Whom do men say that the Son of man is? He did not say, whom do men say that I am, but the Son of man: lest he should seem to seek glory from men. And note that wherever it is written in the Old Testament, son of man, in Hebrew it is written as son of Adam. Just as it is in that (also), which we read in the psalm: Sons of men, how long will you be heavy of heart? (Psal. IV, 3), which in Hebrew is said as sons of Adam. But beautifully he asks: Whom do people say the Son of Man is? For those who speak of the Son of Man are humans; but those who understand his divinity are not humans, but gods are called.
d. AD 420Jeromeas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
This Philip was the brother of Herod, the tetrarch of Ituræa, and the region of Trachonitis, who gave to the city, which is now called Panæas, the name of Cæsarea in honour of Tiberius Cæsar.

Beautifully is the question put, Whom do men say that the Son of Man is? For they who speak of the Son of Man, are men: but they who understood His divine nature are called not men but Gods.

He says not, Whom, do men say that I am? but, Whom do men say that the Son of Man is? that He should not seem to ask ostentatiously concerning Himself. Observe, that wherever the Old Testament has 'Son of Man,' the phrase in the Hebrew is 'Son of Adam,'

It was as easy for the multitudes to be wrong in supposing Him to be Elias and Jeremias, as Herod in supposing Him to be John the Baptist; whence I wonder that some interpreters should have sought for the causes of these several errors.

Observe how by this connection of the discourse the Apostles are not styled men but Gods. For when He had said, Whom say ye that the Son of Man is? Ho adds, Whom say ye that I am? as much as to say, They being men think of Me as man, ye who are Gods, whom do you think Me?

He calls Him the living God, in comparison of those gods who are esteemed gods, but are dead; such, I mean, as Saturn, Jupiter, Venus, Hercules, and the other monsters of idols.

This return Christ makes to the Apostle for the testimony which Peter had spoken concerning Him, Thou art Christ, the Son of the living God. The Lord said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jonas? Why? Because flesh and blood has not revealed this unto thee, but My Father. That which flesh and blood could not reveal, was revealed by the grace of the Holy Spirit. By his confession then he obtains a title, which should signify that he had received a revelation from the Holy Spirit, whose son he shall also be called; for Barjonas in our tongue signifies The son of a dove. Others take it in the simple sense, that Peter is the son of Johnq, according to that question in another place, Simon, son of John, lovest thou me? (John 21:15.) affirming that it is an error of the copyists in writing here Barjonas for Barjoannas, dropping one syllable. Now Joanna is interpreted 'The grace of God.' But either name has its mystical interpretation; the dove signifies the Holy Spirit; and the grace of God signifies the spiritual gift.

Compare what is here said, flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, with the Apostolic declaration, Immediately I was not content with flesh and blood, (Gal. 1:16.) meaning there by this expression the Jews; so that here also the same thing is shown in different words, that not by the teaching of the Pharisees, but by the grace of God, Christ was revealed to him the Son of God.

As much as to say, You have said to me, Thou art Christ, the Son of the living God, therefore I say unto thee, not in a mere speech, and that goes not on into operation; but I say unto thee, and for Me to speak is to make it sor, that thou art Peter. For as from Christ proceeded that light to the Apostles, whereby they were called the light of the world, and those other names which were imposed upon them by the Lord, so upon Simon who believed in Christ the Rock, He bestowed the name of Peter (Rock.)

And pursuing the metaphor of the rock, it is rightly said to him as follows: And upon this rock I will build my Church.

I suppose the gates of hell to mean vice and sin, or at least the doctrines of heretics by which men are ensnared and drawn into hell.

Let none think that this is said of death, implying that the Apostles should not be subject to the condition of death, when we see their martyrdoms so illustrious.

Bishops and Presbyters; not understanding this passage, assume to themselves something of the lofty pretensions of the Pharisees, and suppose that they may either condemn the innocent, or absolve the guilty; whereas what will be enquired into before the Lord will be not the sentence of the Priests, but the life of him that is being judged. We read in Leviticus of the lepers, how they are commanded to show themselves to the Priests, and if they have the leprosy, then they are made unclean by the Priest; not that the Priest makes them leprous and unclean, but that the Priest has knowledge of what is leprosy and what is not leprosy, and can discern who is clean, and who is unclean. In the same way then as there the Priest makes the leper unclean, here the Bishop or Presbyter binds or looses not those who are without sin, or guilt, but in discharge of his function when he has heard the varieties of their sins, he knows who is to be bound, and who loosed.
d. AD 510Epiphanius ScholasticusPost-NiceneSourceINTERPRETATION OF THE GOSPELS 28
Caesarea Philippi is outside Judea in the region of the Gentiles. Why therefore did our Lord not examine his own disciples within the borders of Judea? Why did he go far north into the territory of the Gentiles? But as our insignificance [as Gentiles] works against us, he questioned the disciples in Gentile territory. The result was that by the true and everlasting conviction of the blessed apostle Peter—what flesh and blood had not unveiled, the Father revealed from the heavens. Through faith the Gentiles rather than the Jews would come to acknowledge the Son of God. This indeed occurred in the city of Caesarea—Cornelius who was first among the Gentiles to believe with all his own household, through the holy apostle Peter. The Lord was not inclined to question his own disciples in Judea, when the Jews did not believe that he was the Son of God but regarded him merely as the son of Joseph.
AD 553Second Council of Constantinopleas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Concil. Con. ii. Collat. 8.) How is it that some do presume to say that these things are said only of the living? Know they not that the sentence of anathema is nothing else but separation? They are to be avoided who are held of grievous faults, whether they are among the living, or not. For it is always behoveful to fly from the wicked. Moreover there are divers letters read of Augustine of religious memory, who was of great renown among the African bishops, which affirmed that heretics ought to be anathematized even after death. (vid. Aug. Ep. 185. 4.) Such an ecclesiastical tradition other African Bishops also have preserved. And the Holy Roman Church also has anathematized some Bishops after death, although no accusation had been brought against their faith in their lifetimeu.
d. AD 856Rabanus Maurusas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Early MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
He enquires the opinions of His disciples and of those without, not because He was ignorant of them; His disciples He asks, that He may reward with due reward their confession of a right faith, and the opinions of those without He enquires, that having the wrong opinions first set forth, it might be proved that the disciples had received the truth of their confession not from common opinion, but out of the hidden treasure of the Lord's revelation.

And by a remarkable distinction it was that the Lord Himself puts forward the lowliness of the humanity which He had taken upon Him, while His disciple shows us the excellence of His divine eternity.

The gates of hell are the torments and promises of the persecutors. Also, the evil works of the unbelievers, and vain conversation, are gates of hell, because they show the path of destruction.

For as with a zeal beyond the others he had confessed the King of heaven, he is deservedly entrusted more than the others with the keys of the heavenly kingdom, that it might be clear to all, that without that confession and faith none ought to enter the kingdom of heaven. By the keys of the kingdom He means discernment and power; power, by which he binds and looses, discernment, by which he separates the worthy from the unworthy.

But this power of binding and loosing, though it seems given by the Lord to Peter alone, is indeed given also to the other Apostles, and is even now in the^ Bishops and Presbyters in every Church. (vid. Matt. 18:18.) But Peter received in a special manner the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and a supremacy of judicial power, that all the faithful throughout the world might understand that all who in any manner separate themselves from the unity of the faith, or from communion with him, such should neither be able to be loosed from the bonds of sin, nor to enter the gate of the heavenly kingdom.
d. AD 1107Theophylact of OhridMedieval
The evangelist mentions the founder of the city, Philip, because there is another Caesarea, of Strato, and it was not in the latter, but in the former, that Christ asked them the question. He leads the disciples far away from the Jews so that they could speak boldly without fear of anyone. First He asks for the opinion of the multitude so that the disciples would be directed upwards to a greater understanding and not fall into the same lowliness of understanding as that of the people. He does not ask them, "Who do the Pharisees say that I am?" but "Who do men say?" referring to the guileless multitude.
AD 1150Glossa Ordinariaas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(non occ.) As soon as the Lord had taken His disciples out of the teaching of the Pharisees, He then suitably proceeds to lay deep the foundations of the Gospel doctrine; and to give this the greater solemnity, it is introduced by the name of the place, When Jesus came into the coasts of Cæsarea Philippi.

(ap. Anselm.) When about to confirm the disciples in the faith, He would first take away from their minds the errors and opinions of others, whence it follows, And he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that the Son of Man is?

(non occ.) So by this instance of the Apostles, the followers of the Bishops are instructed, that whatever opinions they may hear out of doors concerning their Bishops, they should tell them to them.

(interlin.) That is, shall not separate it from the love and faith of Me.

(interlin.) It follows, And whatsoever thou shalt bind; that is, whomsoever thou shalt judge unworthy of forgiveness while he lives, shall be judged unworthy with God; and whatsoever thou shalt loose, that is, whomsoever thou shalt judge worthy to be forgiven while he lives, shall obtain forgiveness of his sins from God.

(ap. Anselm.) This power was committed specially to Peter, that we might thereby be invited to unity. For He therefore appointed him the head of the Apostles, that the Church might have one principal Vicar of Christ, to whom the different members of the Church should have recourse, if ever they should have dissensions among them. But if there were many heads in the Church, the bond of unity would be broken. Some say that the words upon earth denote that power was not given to men to bind and loose the dead, but the living; for he who should loose the dead would do this not upon earth, but after the earth.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Matthew 16:13 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8