Skip to content

John 1:42

“Jesus Gathers His First Disciples”John 1:35–51

King James Version
And he brought him to Jesus. And when Jesus beheld him, he said, Thou art Simon the son of Jona: thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, A stone.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
And G2532 he brought G71 him G846 to G4314 Jesus G2424. And G1161 when Jesus G2424 beheld G1689 him G846, he said G2036, Thou G4771 art G1488 Simon G4613 the son G5207 of Jona G2495: thou G4771 shalt be called G2564 Cephas G2786, which G3739 is by interpretation G2059, A stone G4074.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
Andrew brought him to Jesus, who looked at him and said, “You are Simon son of John. You will be called Cephas” (which is translated as Peter).

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
He brought him unto Jesus. Jesus looked upon him, and said, Thou art Simon the son of John: thou shalt be called Cephas (which is by interpretation, Peter).

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
He brought him to Yeshua. Yeshua looked at him, and said, “You are Simon the son of Jonah. You shall be called Kefa ” (which is by interpretation, Peter).

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
And he brought him to Iesus. And Iesus behelde him, and saide, Thou art Simon the sonne of Iona: thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, a stone.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
and he brought him unto Jesus: and having looked upon him, Jesus saith, `Thou art Simon, the son of Jonas, thou shalt be called Cephas,' (which is interpreted, A rock.)

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
24 Greek words
  1. καὶkaiandG2532CONJConjunction
  2. ἤγαγενēgagenHe ledG71V-2AAI-3SVerb 2nd Aorist Active Indicative 3rd Singular
  3. αὐτὸνautonhimG846P-ASMPersonal pronoun Accusative Singular Masculine
  4. πρὸςprostoG4314PREPPreposition
  5. τὸνton[the]G3588T-ASMDefinite article Accusative Singular Masculine
  6. ἸησοῦνIēsounJesusG2424N-ASM-PNoun Accusative Singular Masculine Individual
  7. ἐμβλέψαςemblepsasHaving looked atG1689V-AAP-NSMVerb Aorist Active Participle Nominative Singular Masculine
  8. δὲdenowG1161CONJConjunction
  9. αὐτῷautōhimG846P-DSMPersonal pronoun Dative Singular Masculine
  10. ὁho[the]G3588T-NSMDefinite article Nominative Singular Masculine
  11. ἸησοῦςIēsousJesusG2424N-NSM-PNoun Nominative Singular Masculine Individual
  12. εἶπεν·eipensaidG2036V-2AAI-3SVerb 2nd Aorist Active Indicative 3rd Singular
  13. σὺsuYou yourselfG4771P-2NSPersonal pronoun Nominative 2nd Singular
  14. εἶeiareG1510V-PAI-2SVerb Present Active Indicative 2nd Singular
  15. ΣίμωνSimōnSimonG4613N-NSM-PNoun Nominative Singular Masculine Individual
  16. ὁhotheG3588T-NSMDefinite article Nominative Singular Masculine
  17. υἱὸςhuiossonG5207N-NSMNoun Nominative Singular Masculine
  18. Ἰωάννου·Iōannouof JohnG2491N-GSM-PNoun Genitive Singular Masculine Individual
  19. σὺsuYou yourselfG4771P-2NSPersonal pronoun Nominative 2nd Singular
  20. κληθήσῃklēthēsēwill be calledG2564V-FPI-2SVerb Future Passive Indicative 2nd Singular
  21. ΚηφᾶςKēphasCephasG2786N-NSM-PNoun Nominative Singular Masculine Individual
  22. ὃhowhichG3739R-NSNRelative pronoun Nominative Singular Neuter
  23. ἑρμηνεύεταιhermēneuetaimeansG2059V-PPI-3SVerb Present Passive Indicative 3rd Singular
  24. ΠέτροςPetrosPeterG4074N-NSM-PNoun Nominative Singular Masculine Individual
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
All John Sites (Jerusalem)
All John Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
Jesus is Baptized and Travels to Galilee
Jesus is Baptized and Travels to Galilee View full PDF
All John Sites (Levant)
All John Sites (Levant) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 26,087 of 31,102 · 83.9%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

Andrew brings Simon to Jesus, who looks at him, names who he is, and gives him the new name Cephas, a stone, as a word about what he will make of him.

“And he brought him to Jesus.”

Andrew’s part is to bring his brother. The rest is Jesus’ work.

“And when Jesus beheld him,”

Jesus looks straight at Simon before he speaks.

“Thou art Simon the son of Jona:”

Jesus already knows Simon’s name and his father’s.

“thou shalt be called Cephas,”

The future tense makes the name a promise.

“which is by interpretation, A stone.”

Cephas in Aramaic is Peter in Greek.

Passage studyJohn 1:35–51

Jesus Gathers His First Disciples

Summary

The day after John the Baptist first points out Jesus, he is standing again with two of his disciples. As Jesus walks by, John says, “Behold the Lamb of God!” and the two leave him to follow Jesus. They spend the rest of the day with him, and one of them, Andrew, goes first to his brother Simon with the news, “We have found the Messias.” Jesus looks at Simon and gives him a new name, Cephas. The next day Jesus finds Philip and says, “Follow me,” and Philip finds Nathanael. Nathanael doubts that anything good could come out of Nazareth, yet when Jesus tells him where he was before Philip called him, he confesses Jesus as the Son of God and the King of Israel. Jesus answers with a promise that his disciples will see heaven open and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man. In a few days the first disciples are gathered, each one brought by someone who had already met Jesus, and each one finds that Jesus already knew him.

Why John Sends His Own Disciples to Jesus

The passage keeps count of days. On the day before this one, John the Baptist saw Jesus coming and said, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world,” and he testified that this is the Son of God (John 1:29–34). Verse 35 opens on the next day, and verse 43 opens on the day after that with “The day following”. The days follow quickly, and each one brings new people to Jesus.

Verse 35 begins with pálin, “again”, the plain adverb for something that happens once more. John is at the place beyond Jordan where he was baptizing (John 1:19–28), and he is about to say again what he said the day before. The verb for “stood”, hístēmi, is the ordinary word for standing, and it pictures John at his post with two of his disciples beside him.

A disciple, mathētḗs, is a learner or pupil, from a root meaning to learn. In Israel at that time pupils (in Hebrew, talmidim) attached themselves to a teacher to learn both his teaching and his way of life, and these two men belonged to John in that way. John’s work had been foretold. Isaiah spoke of a voice crying in the wilderness to prepare the way of the LORD (Isaiah 40:3), and Luke applies those words to John (Luke 3:4). Malachi spoke of a messenger sent to prepare the way before the Lord (Malachi 3:1) and of Elijah the prophet coming before the great day of the LORD (Malachi 4:5–6). John came to bear witness of the Light (John 1:6–8). The crowds that came to him wondered whether he might himself be the Christ (Luke 3:15), so he had a following he could have kept for himself. He used it to send his own disciples to Jesus, which is what he later meant when he said, “He must increase, but I must decrease” (John 3:30).

In verse 36 John is “looking upon Jesus as he walked”. The verb emblépō means to look at or look straight at someone, and John has his eyes fixed on Jesus as he passes. Then he speaks to his disciples: “Behold the Lamb of God!” The word íde, “behold”, is an interjection like “see!” or “lo!”, which calls for attention and puts weight on what comes after it. This time John says it to the two men closest to him, and they take it as his word to them.

They hear, and they act. The verb for “heard”, akoúō, is the common word for hearing, and what they heard moved them, because “they followed Jesus”. akolouthéō comes from a word of union and a word for a road, and Strong’s gives its sense as “to be in the same way with”, to go along with someone, especially as a disciple. The two men walk after Jesus along the road, and that walk is the beginning of their life as his disciples. Their own teacher has pointed them to him, so they go with John’s blessing. Jesus would later put the call in his own words: “Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men” (Matthew 4:19), and “take up his cross daily, and follow me” (Luke 9:23). He says that his sheep hear his voice and follow him (John 10:27), and Peter would one day tell him, “thou hast the words of eternal life” (John 6:68).

Why does John call Jesus the Lamb of God?

John calls Jesus the Lamb of God because Jesus is the sacrifice God himself has provided to take away sin. The word amnós is the plain word for a lamb, and every Jew who heard it knew what lambs were for. Many in Israel, living under Rome, were hoping for a deliverer who would set them free by force, and John’s title points to the deeper bondage of sin. Three strands of the Old Testament meet in it.

  • The Passover lamb. On the night Israel left Egypt, each household killed a lamb and put its blood on the door, and the LORD passed over the houses marked with the blood (Exodus 12). Jesus is the Passover Lamb whose blood delivers his people from the penalty of sin.
  • The offerings of the law. A worshipper laid his hand on the head of his offering, and it was accepted to make atonement for him (Leviticus 1:4), and a lamb could be brought as a sin offering (Leviticus 4:32). Those sacrifices had to be offered again and again, and they pointed ahead to a final one. Christ entered the holy place once, by his own blood, and obtained eternal redemption for us (Hebrews 9:11–14).
  • The servant of Isaiah. Isaiah describes the servant of the LORD who “is brought as a lamb to the slaughter” (Isaiah 53:7) and suffers for the sins of others.

The apostles use the same picture. Peter says we were redeemed “with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot” (1 Peter 1:18–19). Paul says God set Christ forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood (Romans 3:25). In Revelation, John sees in the midst of the throne a Lamb as it had been slain (Revelation 5:6), praised because by his blood he has redeemed people to God out of every nation (Revelation 5:9).

What Seek Ye? Jesus Turns to the Two

Jesus turns and sees the two following him. The verb stréphō is a turning round, and with it Jesus takes up the meeting himself and speaks to them first. His first words in John’s Gospel are a question: “What seek ye?” The verb zētéō means to seek, to look for, to try to obtain. Jesus already knows them, as his words to Nathanael will show, and the question brings into the open what they are looking for, so that following him becomes their own clear choice.

They answer with a title and a question. “Rabbi” was a title of honour for a teacher in Israel, meaning “my great one” or “my teacher”, and John explains it for his readers: “which is to say, being interpreted, Master”. He does the same with “Messias” in verse 41 and “Cephas” in verse 42. Then they ask, “where dwellest thou?” The verb is ménō, to stay, abide or remain. A disciple lived near his teacher and learned from his daily life, and these men want to stay where Jesus is and learn from him.

Jesus answers, “Come and see.” The verb érchomai is the ordinary word for coming or going, and eídō means to see, with the eyes or with the mind. Jesus offers himself to be known, and they come to know him by being with him. “They came and saw where he dwelt, and abode with him that day”. “Abode” is ménō again, the same verb as in their question, so they ask where he stays and end up staying with him. The word grows large in this Gospel. Jesus later says, “Abide in me, and I in you” (John 15:4), and he promises that the Spirit of truth will dwell with his disciples and be in them (John 14:16–17).

The whole exchange fits what Scripture says about seeking God. David longed to dwell in the house of the LORD all the days of his life (Psalm 27:4), and a psalm calls, “O taste and see that the LORD is good” (Psalm 34:8). Jesus promises that those who seek will find (Matthew 7:7), and he calls all who labour and are heavy laden to come to him for rest (Matthew 11:28–30). In him are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge (Colossians 2:3). John has already told us that the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us (John 1:14), so these two men spend that day in the company of God made man. After his death and resurrection he would make his home in his people by the Spirit, so that Paul could say, “Christ liveth in me” (Galatians 2:20), and call the believer’s body the temple of the Holy Ghost (1 Corinthians 6:19). Eternal life is to know the only true God and Jesus Christ whom he has sent (John 17:3), and for these two that knowing began on this day.

What was the tenth hour?

The tenth hour is about four in the afternoon if the hours are counted from sunrise, as the Jews counted them, and on that reckoning the two stayed with Jesus into the evening and most likely through the night. Believers differ here, because some hold that John counts from midnight, as the Romans did, which puts the hour at ten in the morning and gives the two a whole day with him. Either way, the writer remembered the hour. The other of the two disciples goes unnamed, and he is most likely John himself, the writer of this Gospel, who keeps his own name out of his book and speaks of himself as the disciple whom Jesus loved (John 21:7). The exact hour is the kind of thing a man remembers of the day his life changed.

Andrew Brings His Brother Simon

Verse 40 names one of the two: “Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother.” The verbs are those of verse 37, akoúō and akolouthéō: he heard John speak and followed Jesus. The word adelphós is the ordinary word for a brother. Andrew is introduced by his link to his brother, who would become the better known of the two, yet Andrew met Jesus first and then brought Simon to him. Matthew and Mark tell of Jesus calling Simon and Andrew by the Sea of Galilee (Matthew 4:18–22, Mark 1:16–18).

Verse 41 says, “He first findeth his own brother Simon”. The verb heurískō means to find, and finding runs through these verses: Andrew finds Simon, Jesus finds Philip, and Philip finds Nathanael. “First” (prōtos) marks this as the first thing Andrew did, and “his own brother” shows that he went straight to his family. His message is short: “We have found the Messias”. The “we” takes in the other disciple, who shared Andrew’s conviction after their day with Jesus.

What do Messias and Christ mean?

Both words mean “anointed”. Messías comes from the Hebrew Mashiach, and John gives its Greek equivalent, Christós, for his readers: “which is, being interpreted, the Christ”. In Israel, kings, priests and sometimes prophets were anointed with oil when God set them apart for their office. A psalm speaks of the rulers taking counsel “against the LORD, and against his anointed” (Psalm 2:2), Daniel speaks of “the Messiah the Prince” (Daniel 9:25–26), and the prophets promised a son of David whose government and peace would increase for ever (Isaiah 9:6–7) and one like the Son of man who would receive an everlasting kingdom (Daniel 7:13–14).

Many in Andrew’s day expected the Messiah to be a king who would drive out Rome and restore David’s throne. Jesus is that King, and he told Pilate, “My kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36). He is also the Prophet that Moses promised (Deuteronomy 18:15) and the Priest who offered himself once for all (Hebrews 9:11–14). Peter preached at Pentecost that God had made Jesus “both Lord and Christ” (Acts 2:36), Paul declared that Jesus is the Christ (Acts 17:3), and John wrote his Gospel so that we might believe “that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God” (John 20:31).

Why did Jesus give Simon a new name?

Jesus gave Simon a new name to declare what he would make of him. “And he brought him to Jesus” is all that Andrew did, and it was enough. “When Jesus beheld him” uses emblépō, the same verb used of John looking upon Jesus in verse 36. Jesus looks straight at Simon and speaks first: “Thou art Simon the son of Jona”. He names the man as he is, with his father’s name, and then names the man he will make: “thou shalt be called Cephas”. The verb kaléō means to call, and here it means to give a name. Kēphâs is the Aramaic word for a rock (Kepha), from the language Jesus and his disciples spoke in Galilee, and John translates it for his readers: “A stone”, which in Greek is Pétros, Peter. Strong’s defines Pétros as a piece of rock. Cephas and Peter are one name in two languages, and both speak of something solid.

When God renamed people in Scripture, he set them in a new place in his purposes. Abram became Abraham, “for a father of many nations have I made thee” (Genesis 17:5), and Jacob became Israel after he wrestled with God (Genesis 32:28). Jesus does the same at his first meeting with Simon, and it shows his authority over the man and his future. The name looks ahead. Simon was quick to speak and quick to act, and he would fail badly before he was restored, yet Jesus would make a rock of him, a leader of the apostles and a steady witness to the resurrection. The Lord who calls people knows what he is making of them before they do.

Jesus explains the name later, when Simon confesses him as the Christ: “thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church” (Matthew 16:18). Believers differ over what that saying means for the order of the church after Peter, and the verse in John, which records only the giving of the name, leaves that question to Matthew. Scripture is plain that Christ himself is the foundation. Paul says that the one foundation laid is Jesus Christ (1 Corinthians 3:11) and that “that Rock was Christ” (1 Corinthians 10:4). The church is “built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone” (Ephesians 2:20), and Christ is the head over all things to the church (Ephesians 1:22–23). Peter himself calls Christ the living stone and believers “lively stones” built up into a spiritual house (1 Peter 2:4–5), with Christ the chief corner stone laid in Sion (1 Peter 2:6–8). Isaiah told Israel to look to the rock they were hewn from, to Abraham, whom God called alone and blessed (Isaiah 51:1–2), and Jesus’ call of Simon is a call of the same kind, to one man for the sake of many.

Jesus Finds Philip

On the next day Jesus “would go forth into Galilee”, which is to say he had made up his mind to go. Galilaía, Galilee, is a name of Hebrew origin that Strong’s renders “the heathen circle”, and Isaiah calls it “Galilee of the nations”, the land where the people that walked in darkness would see a great light (Isaiah 9:1–2). The leaders in Jerusalem looked down on it, and the Pharisees would later tell Nicodemus, “out of Galilee ariseth no prophet” (John 7:52). They had already sent men to question John (John 1:19–28), and Galilee, among ordinary people and away from their scrutiny, would be where Jesus did much of his work.

Then Jesus “findeth Philip”. The verb is heurískō again, and this time Jesus is the one who finds. In Israel a student usually chose his rabbi, and here the Teacher goes looking for his student. His word to Philip is “Follow me”, the command form of akolouthéō, the verb used of the first two in verses 37 and 40. Jesus later told his disciples, “Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you” (John 15:16). He is the good shepherd who gives his life for the sheep (John 10:11), and he goes out to find his own. Before long he would appoint twelve to be with him (Mark 3:13–19).

Bethsaida, the town of the first disciples

Verse 44 adds a note, joined by dé, the little connective translated “Now”: “Philip was of Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter.” Phílippos, Philip, is a Greek name meaning fond of horses, and both Philip and Andrew bear Greek names, a sign of how much Greek was heard in Galilee. Bēthsaïdá means “fishing-house”, a name of Aramaic origin, and it was a fishing village on the north-eastern shore of the Sea of Galilee, near where the Jordan flows into the lake. John calls it a pólis, a city or town, and Herod Philip had raised it to the rank of a city and renamed it Julias. The first disciples were neighbours who already knew one another, and Jesus gathered them through the ties they already had.

Bethsaida comes up again in the Gospels. Jesus healed a blind man there (Mark 8:22–26), and after feeding the five thousand he sent his disciples by boat toward it (Mark 6:45). Even so, he pronounced woe on it for its lack of repentance after all its mighty works (Matthew 11:21). The other Gospels place Peter and Andrew at Capernaum (Mark 1:21). Bethsaida was most likely their home town, and Capernaum the place where they lived and fished when Jesus called them.

These were fishermen from a small town, far from the learned men of Jerusalem. God chose the foolish and weak things of the world, “that no flesh should glory in his presence” (1 Corinthians 1:26–29).

The One of Whom Moses and the Prophets Wrote

Philip does what Andrew did. He “findeth Nathanael” and tells him, “We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write”. gráphō is the ordinary verb to write, and prophḗtēs is a prophet, one who speaks for God. “Moses in the law, and the prophets” names the whole of the Scriptures Israel had, and Philip says all of it was pointing to this man.

Moses wrote that God would raise up a Prophet like him from among his brethren (Deuteronomy 18:15), and Peter applied those words to Jesus (Acts 3:22). The prophets and psalms told of a virgin who would conceive and bear a son (Isaiah 7:14), of one wounded for our transgressions (Isaiah 53:4–6), of the Holy One whom God would keep from corruption (Psalm 16:10), and of the Son of man given everlasting dominion (Daniel 7:13–14). Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth (Romans 10:4). After his resurrection Jesus himself, “beginning at Moses and all the prophets”, expounded in all the scriptures the things concerning himself (Luke 24:27), and he told his disciples that everything written of him in the law of Moses, the prophets and the psalms must be fulfilled (Luke 24:44).

Philip ends with what everyone knew about him: “Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.” That is how his neighbours spoke of him, by his town and his family. Philip’s faith is real, and it is still young. John has already shown us that this man is the Word who was with God and was God, by whom all things were made (John 1:1–3), and who was made flesh (John 1:14). Later the crowds would stumble over the same facts and ask, “Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know?” (John 6:42).

Can Any Good Thing Come Out of Nazareth?

Jesus is the good thing that came out of Nazareth, and Nathanael is about to meet him. His question uses agathós, good, and ek, “out of” or “from”, the ordinary preposition for where something comes from. Nazareth was a small village in Galilee, and the Old Testament never mentions it. Micah had named Bethlehem as the place from which the ruler of Israel would come (Micah 5:2), and later the crowds in Jerusalem argued that the Christ must come from Bethlehem and the seed of David, and so could hardly come from Galilee (John 7:41–42). Nathanael came from Cana (John 21:2), another small Galilean town, and his question was the honest prejudice of a man who knew the Scriptures and knew Nazareth.

God’s way has long been to work through what people pass over. Isaiah said of the servant, “he hath no form nor comeliness” (Isaiah 53:2–3), and the Lord told Paul that his strength is made perfect in weakness (2 Corinthians 12:9).

Philip answers with the invitation Jesus gave in verse 39: “Come and see.” The verb for “see” is eídō, as it was there. Philip leaves Nazareth’s reputation alone and brings Nathanael to the one who can answer for himself. To come and see Jesus is to meet the only begotten Son who has declared the Father (John 1:18), the way, the truth, and the life (John 14:6). A Samaritan woman would later do the same for her town, telling them, “Come, see a man, which told me all things that ever I did: is not this the Christ?” (John 4:29).

An Israelite in Whom Is No Guile

Jesus “saw Nathanael coming” (eídō), and before Nathanael says a word, Jesus speaks about him: “Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile!” An Israēlítēs is a descendant of Israel, and “indeed” (alēthōs) means truly or genuinely. Nathanael is a son of Israel in heart as well as by birth. dólos, guile, is a word Strong’s traces to a decoy, a bait or trick, and so it means craft or deceit. Nathanael is open and straightforward. He said bluntly what he thought of Nazareth, and Jesus counts that honesty to his credit.

The words echo the man Israel was named for. Jacob took his brother’s blessing by deceit, so that Isaac said, “Thy brother came with subtilty, and hath taken away thy blessing” (Genesis 27:35), and only later did God name him Israel (Genesis 32:28). Here stands an Israelite free of the old trickery of Jacob, and in verse 51 Jesus will speak of Jacob’s own dream.

Scripture prizes this kind of heart. “Blessed is the man ... in whose spirit there is no guile” (Psalm 32:2), and God desires “truth in the inward parts” (Psalm 51:6). Peter tells believers to lay aside “all malice, and all guile” (1 Peter 2:1), and of the redeemed who follow the Lamb it is said, “in their mouth was found no guile” (Revelation 14:5). Jesus spoke hard words against religious men whose outward show covered inward corruption (Matthew 23). Christ himself is wholly free of guile: “in him is no sin” (1 John 3:5), and he always did what pleased the Father (John 8:29). Through him we are made new creatures (2 Corinthians 5:17), and he will present his church to himself holy and without blemish (Ephesians 5:27).

Jesus Saw Nathanael Before Philip Called Him

Nathanael’s reply is plain surprise: “Whence knowest thou me?” The verb ginṓskō is the common word for knowing or perceiving, and he simply asks how a stranger can know him. Jesus answers, “Before that Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig tree, I saw thee.” The verb is eídō again. Jesus saw Nathanael before anyone called him, in a place where he was alone, and Nathanael knows that only he himself knew of that moment.

John says of Jesus that he “knew what was in man” (John 2:24–25), and at the well he told the Samaritan woman about her husbands (John 4:17–19). Scripture gives this knowledge to God. Solomon prayed, “thou, even thou only, knowest the hearts of all the children of men” (1 Kings 8:39), David sang, “O LORD, thou hast searched me, and known me” (Psalm 139:1–4), and all things are naked and opened unto the eyes of him with whom we have to do (Hebrews 4:13). When Jesus sees Nathanael under the fig tree, he does what only God does.

That knowledge is also a comfort. Jesus is the shepherd who calls his own sheep by name (John 10:3) and knows them (John 10:14), the high priest who is touched with the feeling of our infirmities (Hebrews 4:15) and makes intercession for us (Romans 8:34), and the Son of man who came to seek and to save that which was lost (Luke 19:10).

What was Nathanael doing under the fig tree?

The verse tells us where Nathanael was, and that is the point: Jesus saw him in a place of his own, apart from others. Fig trees grew beside homes and in gardens, their thick shade made a quiet place to rest, pray or think, and Jewish teachers are said to have studied the law beneath them. Nathanael may well have been praying or reading the Scriptures there, and Jesus’ words about a true Israelite fit such a man, though John leaves the activity unnamed. What Nathanael heard was that Jesus knew his private moment, and that was enough for him.

Son of God and King of Israel

Nathanael answers at once: “Rabbi, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel.” rhabbí is the respectful title for a teacher, the one the first two disciples used in verse 38, and Nathanael moves straight on from it to two greater titles. huiós is the word for a son, and “the Son of God” names one who stands in a unique relationship to God. basileús means a king, one with authority to rule, and “the King of Israel” names Jesus as Israel’s promised ruler. God had promised David a son whose throne he would establish for ever (2 Samuel 7), and Isaiah foretold a child on David’s throne whose kingdom would grow for ever (Isaiah 9:6–7).

Nathanael spoke more truly than he yet understood. Many then thought of the Son of God as the anointed king, and John’s readers know from the opening of the Gospel that the Son is the Word who was God (John 1:1). He was in the form of God and took the form of a servant (Philippians 2:6–7), and he is the Son God gave because he so loved the world (John 3:16). Other confessions follow this one. Peter says, “Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God” (Matthew 16:16), Martha says she believes he is the Christ, the Son of God (John 11:27), and the newly converted Saul preached in the synagogues that Jesus is the Son of God (Acts 9:20).

What are the greater things?

The greater things are the signs, the teaching, the death and the resurrection by which Jesus shows his glory. He receives Nathanael’s faith and points him beyond it: “Because I said unto thee, I saw thee under the fig tree, believest thou? thou shalt see greater things than these.” pisteúō means to believe, to credit what someone says and to trust a person, and Jesus accepts that Nathanael believes. One sign has brought him to faith, and Jesus promises much more. The verb for “shalt see” is optánomai, which Strong’s glosses as to gaze, to look with wide-open eyes as at something remarkable, and what is coming deserves that kind of looking.

The first of these comes within days, at the wedding in Cana, where Jesus turned water into wine, “and manifested forth his glory; and his disciples believed on him” (John 2:1–11). After that come his teaching, his power over sickness and death, his death on the cross, his resurrection and his ascension. In him dwells all the fulness of the Godhead bodily (Colossians 2:9). He even promised that those who believe on him would do greater works, because he goes to the Father (John 14:12), and at Pentecost the Spirit came upon the disciples (Acts 2:1–4).

Heaven Opened Above the Son of Man

Jesus closes with a solemn promise: “Verily, verily, I say unto you”. amḗn is a word of Hebrew origin meaning firm or sure, and as an adverb it means “surely” or “so be it”. In John’s Gospel Jesus doubles it, and it marks what follows as certain truth. He is speaking to Nathanael, “he saith unto him”, yet the promise uses hymîn, the plural “to you”, so it belongs to all the disciples with him. “Hereafter” stands for árti and apó, “from now on”, so what he promises begins now and goes on.

The promise is that “ye shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man.” anabaínō means to go up, and katabaínō means to go or come down. Jesus is speaking of Jacob’s dream at Bethel, where Jacob saw “a ladder set up on the earth, and the top of it reached to heaven: and behold the angels of God ascending and descending on it” (Genesis 28:12). Jacob called the place Bethel, the house of God. Jesus says the angels will go up and come down on the Son of man. He himself is the ladder, the place where heaven and earth meet, and the true house of God. All of God’s dealings with us come down through him, and all our approach to God goes up through him. Paul writes, “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus” (1 Timothy 2:5), and Jesus says, “I am the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6). The guileless Israelite of verse 47 is promised the reality that Jacob’s dream pointed to.

Heaven opened over Jesus at his baptism, when the Spirit came down upon him (Matthew 3:16), and Stephen, as he faced death, saw the heavens opened and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God (Acts 7:56).

Why does Jesus call himself the Son of man?

Jesus calls himself the Son of man because the name holds both his true humanity and the glory Daniel saw. huiós tou anthrṓpou joins huiós, son, with ánthrōpos, man or human being, and it is the name Jesus uses most for himself in the Gospels. Nathanael has just called him the Son of God, and Jesus answers with the Son of man, the same word for son in both. In Daniel’s vision one like the Son of man comes with the clouds of heaven and is given dominion, glory and an everlasting kingdom (Daniel 7:13–14). In John’s Gospel the Son of man is the one who came down from heaven (John 3:13) and has authority to execute judgment (John 5:27). His coming down to us and his going up to the Father are the true descending and ascending: “He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens” (Ephesians 4:8–10).

The Names Given to Jesus in These Days

These verses give Jesus one name after another, and together they say who he is. John the Baptist calls him the Lamb of God. The first disciples call him Rabbi, Master. Andrew calls him the Messias, the Christ. Philip calls him the one of whom Moses and the prophets wrote, and also Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph. Nathanael calls him the Son of God and the King of Israel. Jesus calls himself the Son of man. Each disciple says what he has seen so far, and each name is true. The sacrifice for sin, the Teacher, the Anointed One, the fulfilment of Scripture, the man from a small town, the Son of God, Israel’s King and the meeting place of heaven and earth are one person, and the rest of John’s Gospel shows him to be all of them.

Found by Christ and Brought by Friends

This passage shows us how Christ gathers his people. John the Baptist points two of his disciples to Jesus. Andrew goes first to his own brother. Jesus himself finds Philip, and Philip goes to his friend. Each of these witnesses speaks simply, “Behold the Lamb of God”, “We have found the Messias”, “Come and see”, and leaves the rest to Jesus. The same pattern carries on after the resurrection, when the Lord sends his disciples to teach all nations (Matthew 28:19) and to be his witnesses to the ends of the earth (Acts 1:8). Through Abraham’s seed, which is Christ, the blessing promised to all the families of the earth goes out (Genesis 12:3, Galatians 3:16), and it has reached each of us through someone who met him first.

The passage also shows us our Lord. He turns toward people who follow him and asks what they are looking for. He takes them home for the day. He looks at a fisherman and names what he will become. He goes looking for Philip. He sees Nathanael under the fig tree before anyone calls him, and he meets an honest doubter with knowledge that wins him and a promise of more. The one who came out of Nazareth is the Lamb who takes away the sin of the world and the Son of man on whom heaven stands open. Whoever comes to him with the question of verse 38 in their heart finds that he knew them before they came, and he still says, “Come and see.”

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers John 1:37–42. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 6 verses
Passage under commentJohn 1:37–42
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

We have here the turning over of two disciples from John to Jesus, and one of them fetching in a third, and these are the first-fruits of Christ's disciples; see how small the church was in its beginnings, and what the dawning of the day of its great things was.

I.Andrew and another with him were the two that John Baptist had directed to Christ, John 1:37.

Who the other was we are not told; some think that it was Thomas, comparing John 21:2; others that it was John himself, the penman of this gospel, whose manner it is industriously to conceal his name, John 13:23, and John 20:3.

1.Here is their readiness to go over to Christ: They heard John speak of Christ as the Lamb of God, and they followed Jesus. Probably they had heard John say the same thing the day before, and then it had not the effect upon them which now it had; see the benefit of repetition, and of private personal converse. They heard him speak of Christ as the Lamb of God, that takes away the sin of the world, and this made them follow him. The strongest and most prevailing argument with a sensible awakened soul to follow Christ is that it is he, and he only, that takes away sin.

2.The kind notice Christ took of them, John 1:38. They came behind him; but, though he had his back towards them, he was soon aware of them, and turned, and saw them following. Note, Christ takes early cognizance of the first motions of a soul towards him, and the first step taken in the way to heaven; see Isaiah 64:5; Luke 15:20. He did not stay till they begged leave to speak with him, but spoke first. What communion there is between a soul and Christ, it is he that begins the discourse. He saith unto them, What seek ye? This was not a reprimand for their boldness in intruding into his company: he that came to seek us never checked any for seeking him; but, on the contrary, it is a kind invitation of them into his acquaintance whom he saw bashful and modest: "Come, what have you to say to me? What is your petition? What is your request." Note, Those whose business it is to instruct people in the affairs of their souls should be humble, and mild, and easy of access, and should encourage those that apply to them. The question Christ put to them is what we should all put to ourselves when we begin to follow Christ, and take upon us the profession of his holy religion: "What seek ye? What do we design and desire?" Those that follow Christ, and yet seek the world, or themselves, or the praise of men, deceive themselves. "What seek we in seeking Christ? Do we seek a teacher, ruler, and reconciler? In following Christ, do we seek the favour of God and eternal life?" If our eye be single in this, we are full of light.

3.Their modest enquiry concerning the place of his abode: Rabbi, where dwellest thou?

(1.)In calling him Rabbi, they intimated that their design in coming to him was to be taught by him; rabbi signifies a master, a teaching master; the Jews called their doctors, or learned men, rabbies. The word comes from rab, multus or magnus, a rabbi, a great man, and one that, as we say, has much in him. Never was there such a rabbi as our Lord Jesus, such a great one, in whom were hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge. These came to Christ to be his scholars, so must all those that apply themselves to him. John had told them that he was the Lamb of God; now this Lamb is worthy to take the book and open the seals as a rabbi, Revelation 5:9. And, unless we give up ourselves to be ruled and taught by him, he will not take away our sins.

(2.)In asking where he dwelt, they intimate a desire to be better acquainted with him. Christ was a stranger in this country, so that they meant where was his inn where he lodged; for there they would attend him at some seasonable time, when he should appoint, to receive instruction from him; they would not press rudely upon him, when it was not proper. Civility and good manners well become those who follow Christ. And, besides, they hoped to have more from him than they could have in a short conference now by the way. They resolved to make a business, not a by-business of conversing with Christ. Those that have had some communion with Christ cannot but desire,

[1.]A further communion with him; they follow on to know more of him.

[2.]A fixed communion with him; where they may sit down at his feet, and abide by his instructions. It is not enough to take a turn with Christ now and then, but we must lodge with him.

4.The courteous invitation Christ gave them to his lodgings: He saith unto them, Come and see. Thus should good desires towards Christ and communion with him be countenanced.

(1.)He invites them to come to his lodgings: the nearer we approach to Christ, the more we see of his beauty and excellency. Deceivers maintain their interest in their followers by keeping them at a distance, but that which Christ desired to recommend him to the esteem and affections of his followers was that they would come and see: "Come and see what a mean lodging I have, what poor accommodations I take up with, that you may not expect any worldly advantage by following me, as they did who made their court to the scribes and Pharisees, and called them rabbin. Come and see what you must count upon if you follow me." See Matthew 8:20.

(2.)He invites them to come immediately and without delay. They asked where he lodged, that they might wait upon him at a more convenient season; but Christ invites them immediately to come and see; never in better time than now. Hence learn,

[1.]As to others, that it is best taking people when they are in a good mind; strike while the iron is hot.

[2.]As to ourselves, that it is wisdom to embrace the present opportunities: Now is the accepted time, 2 Corinthians 6:2.

5.Their cheerful and (no doubt) thankful acceptance of his invitation: They came and saw where he dwelt, and abode with him that day. It had been greater modesty and manners than had done them good if they had refused this offer. (2.) They readily went along with him: They came and saw where he dwelt. Gracious souls cheerfully accept Christ's gracious invitations; as David, Psalm 27:8. They enquired not how they might be accommodated with him, but would put that to the venture, and make the best of what they found. It is good being where Christ is, wherever it be. (2.) They were so well pleased with what they found that they abode with him that day ("Master, it is good to be here"); and he bade them welcome. It was about the tenth hour. Some think that John reckons according to the Roman computation, and that it was about ten o'clock in the morning, and they staid with him till night; others think that John reckons as the other evangelists did, according to the Jewish computation, and that it was four o'clock in the afternoon, and they abode with him that night and the next day. Dr. Lightfoot conjectures that this next day that they spent with Christ was a sabbath-day, and, it being late, they could not get home before the sabbath. As it is our duty, wherever we are, to contrive to spend the sabbath as much as may be to our spiritual benefit and advantage, so they are blessed who, by the lively exercises of faith, love, and devotion, spend their sabbaths in communion with Christ. These are Lord's days indeed, days of the Son of man.

II.Andrew brought his brother Peter to Christ.

If Peter had been the first-born of Christ's disciples, the papists would have made a noise with it: he did indeed afterwards come to be more eminent in gifts, but Andrew had the honour first to be acquainted with Christ, and to be the instrument of bringing Peter to him. Observe,

1.The information which Andrew gave to Peter, with an intimation to come to Christ.

(1.)He found him: He first finds his own brother Simon; his finding implies his seeking him. Simon came along with Andrew to attend John's ministry and baptism, and Andrew knew where to look for him. Perhaps the other disciple that was with him went out to seek some friend of his at the same time, but Andrew sped first: He first findeth Simon, who came only to attend on John, but has his expectations out-done; he meets with Jesus.

(2.)He told him whom they had found: We have found the Messias. Observe, [1.] he speaks humbly; not, "I have found," assuming the honour of the discovery to himself, but "We have," rejoicing that he had shared with others in it. [2.] He speaks exultingly, and with triumph: We have found that pearl of great price, that true treasure; and, having found it, he proclaims it as those lepers, 2 Kings 7:9, for he knows that he shall have never the less in Christ for others sharing. [3.] He speaks intelligently: We have found the Messias, which was more than had yet been said. John had said, He is the Lamb of God, and the Son of God, which Andrew compares with the scriptures of the Old Testament, and, comparing them together, concludes that he is the Messiah promised to the fathers, for it is now that the fulness of time is come. Thus, by making God's testimonies his meditation, he speaks more clearly concerning Christ than ever his teacher had done, Psalm 119:99.

(3.)He brought him to Jesus; would not undertake to instruct him himself, but brought him to the fountain-head, persuaded him to come to Christ and introduced him. Now this was,

[1.]An instance of true love to his brother, his own brother, so he is called here, because he was very dear to him. Note, We ought with a particular concern and application to seek the spiritual welfare of those that are related to us; for their relation to us adds both to the obligation and to the opportunity of doing good to their souls.

[2.]It was an effect of his day's conversation with Christ. Note, the best evidence of our profiting by the means of grace is the piety and usefulness of our conversation afterwards. Hereby it appeared that Andrew had been with Jesus that he was so full of him, that he had been in the mount, for his face shone. He knew there was enough in Christ for all; and, having tasted that he is gracious, he could not rest till those he loved had tasted it too. Note, True grace hates monopolies, and loves not to eat its morsels alone.

2.The entertainment which Jesus Christ gave to Peter, who was never the less welcome for his being influenced by his brother to come, John 1:42. Observe,

(1.)Christ called him by his name: When Jesus beheld him, he said, Thou art Simon, the son of Jona. It should seem that Peter was utterly a stranger to Christ, and if so,

[1.]It was a proof of Christ's omniscience that upon the first sight, without any enquiry, he could tell the name both of him and of his father. The Lord knows them that are his, and their whole case. However,

[2.]It was an instance of his condescending grace and favour, that he did thus freely and affably call him by his name, though he was of mean extraction, and vir mullius nominis - a man of no name. It was an instance of God's favour to Moses that he knew him by name, Exodus 33:17. Some observe the signification of these names: Simon - obedient, Jona - a dove. An obedient dove-like spirit qualifies us to be the disciples of Christ.

(2.)He gave him a new name: Cephas.

[1.]His giving him a name intimates Christ's favour to him. A new name denotes some great dignity, Revelation 2:17; Isaiah 62:2. By this Christ not only wiped off the reproach of his mean and obscure parentage, but adopted him into his family as one of his own.

[2.]The name which he gave him bespeaks his fidelity to Christ: Thou shalt be called Cephas (that is Hebrew for a stone), which is by interpretation Peter; so it should be rendered, as Acts 9:36. Tabitha, which by interpretation is called Dorcas; the former Hebrew, the latter Greek, for a young roe. Peter's natural temper was stiff, and hardy, and resolute, which I take to be the principal reason why Christ called him Cephas - a stone. When Christ afterwards prayed for him, that his faith might not fail, that so he might be firm to Christ himself, and at the same time bade him strengthen his brethren, and lay out himself for the support of others, then he made him what he here called him, Cephas - a stone. Those that come to Christ must come with a fixed resolution to be firm and constant to him, like a stone, solid and stedfast; and it is by his grace that they are so. His saying, Be thou steady, makes them so. Now this does no more prove that Peter was the singular or only rock upon which the church is built than the calling of James and John Boanerges proves them the only sons of thunder, or the calling of Joses Barnabas proves him the only son of consolation.

Historical interpretation

Four Centuries of Reception

10 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

10 quotes · AD 407–804
Post-NiceneEarly Medieval
400500600700800

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

d. AD 407John Chrysostomas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Hom. xix. 1, 2) And therefore he said not Messias, but the Messias. Mark the obedience of Peter from the very first; ho went immediately without delay, as appears from the next words: And he brought him to Jesus. Nor let us blame him as too yielding, because he did not ask many questions, before he received the word. It is reasonable to suppose that his brother had told him all, and sufficiently fully; but the Evangelists often make omissions for the sake of brevity. But, besides this, it is not absolutely said that he did believe, but only, He took him to Jesus; i. e. to learn from the mouth of Jesus Himself, what Andrew had reported. Our Lord begins now Himself to reveal the things of His Divinity, and to exhibit them gradually by prophecy. For prophecies are no less persuasive than miracles; inasmuch as they are preeminently God's work, and are beyond the power of devils to imitate, while miracles may be phantasy or appearance: the foretelling future events with certainty is an attribute of the incorruptible nature alone: And when Jesus beheld him, He said, Thou art Simon the son of Jonas; thou shall be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, A stone.

(Hom. xix. [al. xviii. 2]) He changed the name too to show that He was the same who done so before in the Old Testament; who had called Abram Abraham, Sarai Sarah, Jacob Israel. Many He had named from their birth, as Isaac and Samson; others again after being named by their parents, as were Peter, and the sons of Zebedee. Those whose virtue was to be eminent from their early youth, from that time received their names; while to those who were to become great at a later period, the title also was given later.
"And when Jesus beheld him," saith the Evangelist, "He said, Thou art Simon, the son of Jonas; thou shalt be called Cephas, which is, by interpretation, a stone."

He begins from this time forth to reveal the things belonging to His Divinity, and to open It out little by little by predictions. So He did in the case of Nathaniel and the Samaritan woman. For prophecies bring men over not less than miracles; and are free from the appearance of boasting. Miracles may possibly be slandered among foolish men, ("He casteth out devils," said they, "by Beelzebub"), but nothing of the kind has ever been said of prophecy. Now in the case of Nathaniel and Simon He used this method of teaching, but with Andrew and Philip He did not so. Why was this? Because those (two) had the testimony of John, no small preparation, and Philip received a credible evidence of faith, when he saw those who had been present.

"Thou art Simon, the son of Jonas." By the present, the future is guaranteed; for it is clear that He who named Peter's father foreknew the future also. And the prediction is attended with praise; but the object was not to flatter, but to foretell something future.
And behold, I beg of you, the mind of Peter obedient and tractable from the very beginning; he ran to Him without any delay; "He brought him," saith St. John, "to Jesus." Yet let no one blame his easy temper if he received the word without much questioning, because it is probable that his brother had told him these things more exactly and at length; but the Evangelists from their care for conciseness constantly cut many things short. Besides, it is not said absolutely that "he believed," but that "he brought him to Jesus," to give him up for the future to Him, so that from Him he might learn all; for the other disciple also was with him, and contributed to this. And if John the Baptist, when he had said that He was "the Lamb," and that He "baptized with the Spirit," gave them over to learn the clearer doctrine concerning this thing from Him, much more would Andrew have done this, not deeming himself sufficient to declare the whole, but drawing him to the very fount of light with so much zeal and joy, that the other neither deferred nor delayed at all.
But Peter makes no reply to these words; as yet he knew nothing clearly, but still was learning. And observe, that not even the prediction is fully set forth; for Jesus did not say, "I will change thy name to Peter, and upon this rock I will build My Church," but, "Thou shalt be called Cephas." The former speech would have expressed too great authority and power; for Christ does not immediately nor at first declare all His power, but speaks for a while in a humbler tone; and so, when He had given the proof of His Divinity, He puts it more authoritatively, saying, "Blessed art thou, Simon, because My Father hath revealed it to thee"; and again, "Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build My Church." Him therefore He so named, and James and his brother He called "sons of thunder." Why then doth He this? To show that it was He who gave the old covenant, that it was He who altered names, who called Abram "Abraham," and Sarai "Sarah," and Jacob "Israel." To many he assigned names even from their birth, as to Isaac, and Samson, and to those in Isaiah and Hosea; but to others He gave them after they had been named by their parents, as to those we have mentioned, and to Joshua the son of Nun. It was also a custom of the Ancients to give names from things, which in fact Leah also has done; and this takes place not without cause, but in order that men may have the appellation to remind them of the goodness of God, that a perpetual memory of the prophecy conveyed by the names may sound in the ears of those who receive it. Thus too He named John early, because they whose virtue was to shine forth from their early youth, from that time received their names; while to those who were to become great at a later period, the title also was given later.
d. AD 430Augustine of HippoPost-NiceneSourceHARMONY OF THE GOSPELS 2.17.34
The Evangelist John, again, tells us that before Jesus went into Galilee, Peter and Andrew were with him one day. He also tells us that on that occasion the former had this name, Peter, given to him, while before that he was called Simon. Likewise, John tells us that on the day following, when Jesus now wanted to go up to Galilee, he found Philip and told him to follow him. In this way, too, the Evangelist comes to give the narrative about Nathanael. Further, he informs us that on the third day, when he was yet in Galilee, Jesus brought about the miracle of the turning of the water into wine at Cana. All these incidents are left unrecorded by the other Evangelists, who continue their narratives at once with the statement of the return of Jesus into Galilee. From this, we are to understand that there was an interval here of several days during which those incidents took place in the history of the disciples that are inserted at this point by John. Neither is there anything contradictory here to that other passage where Matthew tells us how the Lord said to Peter, “You are Peter, and on this rock will I build my church.” But we are not to understand that that was the time when he first received this name. We are rather to suppose that this took place on the occasion when it was said to him, as John mentions, “You shall be called Cephas, which is, by interpretation, ‘a rock.’ ” Thus the Lord could address him at that later period by this very name when he said, “You are Peter.” For he does not say then, “You shall be called Peter” but “You are Peter,” because on a previous occasion it had already been said, “You shall be called.”
d. AD 430Augustine of HippoPost-NiceneSourceTractates on John 7
"And he brought him to Jesus; and when Jesus beheld him, He said, Thou art Simon the son of Joannes: thou shalt be called Cephas, which is, by interpretation, Peter." It is not a great thing that the Lord said whose son Peter was. What is great to the Lord? He knew all the names of His own saints, whom He predestinated before the foundation of the world; and dost thou wonder that He said to one man, Thou art the son of this man, and thou shalt be called this or that? Is it a great matter that He changed his name, and converted it from Simon to Peter? Peter is from petra, a rock, but the petra [rock] is the Church; in the name of Peter, then, was the Church figured. And who is safe, unless he who builds upon the rock? And what saith the Lord Himself? "He that heareth these my words, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man building his house upon a rock" (he doth not yield to temptation). "The rain descended, the floods came, the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock. But he that heareth my words, and doeth them not" (now let each one of us fear and beware), "I will liken him to a foolish man, who built his house upon the sand: the rain descended, the floods came, the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it." What profit is it to enter the Church for him who builds upon the sand? For, by hearing and not doing, he builds indeed, but on the sand. For if he hears nothing, he builds nothing; but if he hears, he builds. But we ask, Where? For if he hears and does, he builds upon the rock; if he hears and does not, he builds upon the sand. There are two kinds of builders, those building upon the rock, and those building upon the sand. What, then, are those who do not hear? Are they safe? Does He say that they are safe because they do not build? They are naked beneath the rains, before the winds, before the floods; when these come, they carry away: those persons before they overthrow the houses. It is then the only security, both to build, and to build upon the rock. If thou wilt hear and do not, thou buildest; but thou buildest a ruin: and when temptation comes it overthrows the house, and carries away thee with the ruin. But if thou dost not hear, thou art naked; thou thyself art dragged away by those temptations. Hear, then, and do; it is the only remedy. How many, perchance, on this day, by hearing and not doing, are hurried away on the stream of this festival! For, through hearing and not doing, the flood cometh, this annual festival; the torrent is filled, it will pass away and become dry, but woe to him whom it shall carry away! Know this, then, beloved, that unless a man hears and does, he builds not upon the rock, and he does not belong to that great name which the Lord so commended. For He has called thy attention. For if Simon had been called Peter before, thou wouldest not have so clearly seen the mystery of the rock, and thou wouldest have thought that he was called so by chance, not by the providence of God; therefore God willed that he should be called first something else, that by the very change of name the reality of the sacrament might be commended to our notice.
d. AD 430Augustine of Hippoas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Tr. vii. c. 14) There was nothing very great in our Lord saying whose son he was, for our Lord knew the names of all His saints, having predestinated them before the foundation of the world. But it was a great thing for our Lord to change his name from Simon to Peter. Peter is from petra, rock, which rock is the Church: so that the name of Peter represents the Church. And who is safe, unless he build upon a rock? Our Lord here rouses our attention: for had he been called Peter before, we should not have seen the mystery of the Rock, and should have thought that he was called so by chance, and not providentially. God therefore made him to be called by another name before, that the change of that name might give vividness to the mystery.

(de Con. Evang. l. ii. c. 17) The account here of the two disciples on the Jordan, who follow Christ (before he had gone into Galilee) in obedience to John's testimony; viz. of Andrew bringing his brother Simon to Jesus, who gave him, on this occasion, the name of Peter; disagrees considerably with the account of the other Evangelists, viz. that our Lord found these two, Simon and Andrew, fishing in Galilee, and then bid them follow Him: unless we understand that they did not regularly join our Lord when they saw Him on the Jordan; but only discovered who He was, and full of wonder, then returned to their occupations. Nor must we think that Peter first received his name on the occasion mentioned in Matthew, when our Lord says, Thou art Peter, and upon this rock will I build My Church; (Mat. 16:18) but rather when our Lord says, Thou shall be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, A stone.
He after a Divine sort looketh upon him, Who seeth the hearts and reins; and seeth to how great piety the disciple will attain, of how great virtue he will be possessed, and at what consummation he will leave off. For He Who knoweth all things before they be is not ignorant of ought. And herein does He specially instruct him that is called, that being Very God, He hath knowledge untaught. For not having needed a single word, nor even sought to learn who or whence the man came to Him; He says of what father he was born, and what was his own name, and permits him to be no more called Simon, already exercising lordship and power over him, as being His: but changes it to Peter from Petra: for upon him was He about to found His Church.
d. AD 735Bedeas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Early MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Hom. i. Temp. Hier. in Vig. S. Andr.) He beheld him not with His natural eye only, but by the insight of His Godhead discerned from eternity the simplicity and greatness of his soul, for which he was to be elevated above the whole Church. In the word Peter, we must not look for any additional meaning, as though it were of Hebrew or Syriac derivation; for the Greek and Latin word Peter, has the same meaning as Cephas; being in both languages derived from petra. He is called Peter on account of the firmness of his faith, in cleaving to that Rock, of which the Apostle speaks, And that Rock was Christ; (1 Cor. 10:4) which secures those who trust in it from the snares of the enemy, and dispenses streams of spiritual gifts.
d. AD 804Alcuin of Yorkas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Early MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
Or perhaps He does not actually give him the name now, but only fixes beforehand what He afterwards gave him when He said, Thou art Peter, and upon this rock will I build My Church. And while about to change his name, Christ wishes to show that even that which his parents had given him, was not without a meaning. For Simon signifies obedience, Joanna grace, Jona a dove: as if the meaning was; Thou art an obedient son of grace, or of the dove, i. e. the Holy Spirit; for thou hast received of the Holy Spirit the humility, to desire, at Andrew's call, to see Me. The elder disdained not to follow the younger; for where there is meritorious faith, there is no order of seniority.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying John 1:42 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8