1 Corinthians 1:12

Translation
King James Version
Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Now G1161 this G5124 I say G3004, that G3754 every one G1538 of you G5216 saith G3004, I G1473 G3303 am G1510 of Paul G3972; and G1161 I G1473 of Apollos G625; and G1161 I G1473 of Cephas G2786; and G1161 I G1473 of Christ G5547.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
I say this because one of you says, “I follow Sha’ul”; another says, “I follow Apollos”; another, “I follow Kefa”; while still another says, “I follow the Messiah!”
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
What I mean is this: Individuals among you are saying, “I follow Paul,” “I follow Apollos,” “I follow Cephas,” or “I follow Christ.”
Ask
American Standard Version
Now this I mean, that each one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Now I mean this, that each one of you says, “I follow Paul,” “I follow Apollos,” “I follow Kefa,” and, “I follow Messiah.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Nowe this I say, that euery one of you saith, I am Pauls, and I am Apollos, and I am Cephas, and I am Christs.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and I say this, that each one of you saith, `I, indeed, am of Paul' --`and I of Apollos,' --`and I of Cephas,' --`and I of Christ.'
Ask
See also
1 Corinthians 3:211 Corinthians 3:23John 1:42Matthew 23:9Matthew 23:101 Corinthians 3:41 Corinthians 3:6
See on the biblical-era map
Corinthians
Corinthians View full PDF
Epistles Overview
Epistles Overview View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 28,376 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

In 1 Corinthians 1:12, the Apostle Paul confronts the Corinthian church's severe problem of internal divisions, where believers were fragmenting into factions based on allegiance to various prominent leaders like Paul himself, Apollos, or Cephas, and even a group claiming exclusive loyalty to Christ. This verse vividly exposes the spiritual immaturity and disunity that arose from elevating human personalities above the singular, unifying headship of Jesus Christ, thereby undermining the very nature of the church as one body.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated at the very beginning of Paul's first letter to the Corinthians, immediately following his initial greetings and a brief thanksgiving. Paul wastes no time in addressing the core issue plaguing the church: its profound disunity. In 1 Corinthians 1:10, he makes an urgent appeal for them to "agree, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment." Verse 12 then provides the concrete evidence and specific manifestation of these divisions, detailing the partisan slogans adopted by various groups within the community. This sets the stage for Paul's subsequent arguments throughout the initial chapters, where he systematically dismantles the wisdom of the world, the folly of human boasting, and the necessity of focusing solely on Christ crucified as the foundation for true unity and spiritual maturity.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Corinth was a prominent and wealthy Roman colony, a bustling port city known for its diverse population, commercial activity, and unfortunately, its moral laxity and philosophical schools. The city's culture often emphasized rhetoric, wisdom, and the following of influential teachers or philosophers. This cultural backdrop likely contributed to the Corinthians' tendency to elevate human leaders and their oratorical skills, treating Christian teachers like philosophical masters whose followers would proudly declare their allegiance. Such a mindset, while common in the Greco-Roman world, was antithetical to the unity and humility required within the body of Christ. The church itself was likely composed of both Jewish and Gentile converts, bringing diverse backgrounds and potentially pre-existing social hierarchies or intellectual biases into the Christian community.
  • Key Themes: The factions described in 1 Corinthians 1:12 are central to several overarching themes in the letter. The most prominent is Church Divisions and Unity, as Paul consistently calls the Corinthians back to the singular focus on Christ and the unity of the Spirit. This verse also highlights the danger of Elevating Human Leaders Above Christ, a theme Paul elaborates upon by asserting that ministers are merely servants through whom people believe (1 Corinthians 3:5) and that Christ alone is the foundation (1 Corinthians 3:11). Furthermore, the divisions reveal Spiritual Immaturity, which Paul directly addresses in 1 Corinthians 3:1-4, likening their behavior to that of "carnal" or "infant" believers, unable to handle solid spiritual food. The verse also implicitly introduces the theme of The Supremacy of Christ and the Cross, as Paul will argue that the wisdom of God is found not in human eloquence or worldly power but in the crucified Christ, which stands in stark contrast to the worldly wisdom that fueled their divisions.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • saith (Greek, légō', G3004): This word, derived from G3004, means "to lay forth" or "relate in words," often implying a systematic or set discourse. In this context, it suggests a deliberate declaration or proclamation of allegiance, indicating that the factions were not merely informal preferences but vocal, asserted identities within the community. The repetition of "saith" emphasizes the pervasive and active nature of these divisive declarations.
  • every one (Greek, hékastos', G1538): Meaning "each or every." This term highlights the widespread nature of the problem, indicating that the divisions were not limited to a few individuals but permeated the entire Corinthian congregation. It underscores the severity of the disunity, suggesting that nearly every member had adopted a partisan identity.
  • Cephas (Greek, Kēphâs', G2786): Derived from G2786, this is the Aramaic equivalent of the Greek name "Peter," both meaning "rock." The inclusion of Cephas (Peter) alongside Paul and Apollos demonstrates the breadth of the factions, extending even to the most prominent apostles. It also subtly reinforces the idea that these divisions were based on human personalities, regardless of their apostolic authority or spiritual stature.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Now this I say, that every one of you saith": Paul introduces his direct confrontation of the problem, emphasizing that he is speaking with authority and that the issue is a widespread, vocal declaration among the Corinthians. The repetition of "saith" underscores the active and public nature of their partisan allegiances.
  • "I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas": This clause reveals the specific nature of the divisions. Believers were identifying themselves by the names of prominent Christian leaders, treating them as figureheads for distinct groups or schools of thought. This indicates a misplaced loyalty, shifting focus from Christ to human personalities and their ministries.
  • "and I of Christ": This final phrase is particularly striking and ironic. While claiming allegiance to Christ seems righteous, in this context, it functions as another divisive slogan. It suggests a group that believed they possessed a superior or more direct connection to Christ, using this claim to distinguish themselves from and implicitly judge other believers, thereby contributing to the very disunity Paul condemns.

Literary Devices

Paul employs several literary devices in this concise verse to powerfully convey the gravity of the Corinthian divisions. Repetition is evident in the phrase "I am of..." (implied by the structure), which is reiterated for each leader, underscoring the pervasive and formulaic nature of their partisan declarations. This creates a rhythmic, almost chant-like effect, highlighting the ingrained nature of their factionalism. There is a strong element of Irony, particularly in the final declaration, "and I of Christ." What should be a unifying statement is presented as another divisive slogan, revealing the perverse way in which even spiritual truths can be weaponized for sectarian purposes. This also serves as a form of Antithesis, contrasting the ideal of unity in Christ with the reality of division, even under the guise of Christ's name. The verse also uses Metonymy, where the names of the leaders (Paul, Apollos, Cephas) stand in for the groups of followers who aligned themselves with those figures, effectively personifying the factions.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The profound disunity exposed in 1 Corinthians 1:12 strikes at the very heart of Christian theology regarding the nature of the church. The church is envisioned as the unified body of Christ, with Christ as its sole head, and all members are to be bound together by their common faith in Him, not by allegiance to human leaders or theological schools. These divisions betray a fundamental misunderstanding of the gospel, which calls believers to humility, self-sacrifice, and mutual love, rather than prideful boasting in human wisdom or personality. Paul's subsequent arguments emphasize that Christ was not divided, nor was anyone baptized in the name of a human leader, thereby dismantling the very foundation of their sectarianism and redirecting their focus to the unifying power of the cross.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The message of 1 Corinthians 1:12 resonates powerfully with the contemporary church, serving as a timeless warning against the insidious nature of division. It challenges us to examine our own loyalties: are we more devoted to a particular preacher, denomination, theological tradition, or worship style than we are to Christ Himself and the unity of His body? This verse calls for a radical reorientation of our affections, reminding us that our primary allegiance must always be to Jesus Christ alone, who died for all believers and is the sole foundation of the church. True spiritual maturity is evidenced not by intellectual superiority or adherence to a specific leader, but by a humble commitment to the unity of the Spirit, a willingness to overlook minor differences for the sake of the gospel, and a fervent love for all who name the name of Christ. We are to celebrate our diversity within the framework of our shared identity in Christ, rather than allowing it to become a source of strife or exclusion.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what ways might I, or my church community, be susceptible to forming factions based on human leaders, theological preferences, or cultural styles?
  • How does my personal allegiance to Christ alone impact my relationships with believers from different church backgrounds or traditions?
  • What practical steps can I take to promote unity within my local church and the broader body of Christ, rather than contributing to division?
  • How can I ensure that my zeal for truth does not inadvertently lead to a spirit of exclusivity or judgment towards other believers?

FAQ

What was the problem with the group that claimed "I am of Christ" in 1 Corinthians 1:12?

Answer: While proclaiming allegiance to Christ is inherently good and necessary, in the context of 1 Corinthians 1:12, this statement was presented by Paul as another manifestation of division, not of genuine unity. It likely indicated a group that claimed exclusive spiritual superiority or a more direct, perhaps even mystical, connection to Christ, thereby using this claim to differentiate themselves from and look down upon those who followed Paul, Apollos, or Cephas. This attitude fostered pride and exclusivity, undermining the very unity that Christ embodies. Paul's point is that even a correct theological statement can be used in an unchristlike and divisive manner when applied with a spirit of judgment or elitism rather than humility and love for the entire body of Christ.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

1 Corinthians 1:12, though highlighting the tragic reality of division, ultimately points to the profound Christ-centered fulfillment found in the New Covenant. The very problem Paul addresses—the fragmentation of the church around human personalities—underscores the absolute necessity of Christ as the singular, unifying head of the church. The New Testament consistently presents Jesus as the one in whom all things hold together (Colossians 1:17), the cornerstone upon which the entire spiritual edifice is built (Ephesians 2:20), and the one in whom there is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for all are one in Him (Galatians 3:28). The cross, far from being a symbol of division, is the ultimate act of reconciliation, breaking down the dividing wall of hostility (Ephesians 2:14) and bringing all believers into one body through His sacrifice (Ephesians 2:16). Thus, the solution to Corinthian-like divisions is not a better human leader or a more refined philosophy, but a deeper, unwavering commitment to the crucified and risen Christ, who alone is the source and sustainer of true unity within His church.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Corinthians 1 verses 10–13

Here the apostle enters on his subject.

I. He extorts them to unity and brotherly love, and reproves them for their divisions. He had received an account from some that wished them well of some unhappy differences among them. It was neither ill-will to the church, nor to their ministers, that prompted them to give this account; but a kind and prudent concern to have these heats qualified by Paul's interposition. He writes to them in a very engaging way: "I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ; if you have any regard to that dear and worthy name by which you are called, be unanimous. Speak all the same thing; avoid divisions or schisms" (as the original is), "that is, all alienation of affection from each other. Be perfectly joined together in the same mind, as far as you can. In the great things of religion be of a mind: but, when there is not a unity of sentiment, let there be a union of affections. The consideration of being agreed in greater things should extinguish all feuds and divisions about minor ones."

II. He hints at the origin of these contentions. Pride lay at the bottom, and this made them factious. Only of pride cometh contention, Pro 13:10. They quarrelled about their ministers. Paul and Apollos were both faithful ministers of Jesus Christ, and helpers of their faith and joy: but those who were disposed to be contentious broke into parties, and set their ministers at the head of their several factions: some cried up Paul, perhaps as the most sublime and spiritual teacher; others cried up Apollos, perhaps as the most eloquent speaker; some Cephas, or Peter, perhaps for the authority of his age, or because he was the apostle of the circumcision; and some were for none of them, but Christ only. So liable are the best things in the world to be corrupted, and the gospel and its institutions, which are at perfect harmony with themselves and one another, to be made the engines of variance, discord, and contention. This is no reproach to our religion, but a very melancholy evidence of the corruption and depravity of human nature. Note, How far will pride carry Christians in opposition to one another! Even so far as to set Christ and his own apostles at variance, and make them rivals and competitors.

III. He expostulates with them upon their discord and quarrels: "Is Christ divided? No, there is but one Christ, and therefore Christians should be on one heart. Was Paul crucified for you? Was he your sacrifice and atonement? Did I ever pretend to be your saviour, or any more than his minister? Or, were you baptized in the name of Paul? Were you devoted to my service, or engaged to be my disciples, by that sacred rite? Did I challenge that right in you, or dependence from you, which is the proper claim of your God and Redeemer?" No; ministers, however instrumental they are of good to us, are not to be put in Christ's stead. They are not to usurp Christ's authority, nor encourage any thing in the people that looks like transferring his authority to them. He is our Saviour and sacrifice, he is our Lord and guide. And happy were it for the churches if there were no name of distinction among them, as Christ is not divided.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 10–13. Public domain.
Copy as
Clement of RomeAD 99
EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS 47.3-4
Inspired by God, Paul wrote to you concerning himself and Cephas and Apollos, because even then you were given to faction. But that factiousness involved you in less guilt, because then you were partisans of highly reputed apostles and of those commended by them.
TertullianAD 220
Against Marcion Book V
Of this work the Creator also by the same prophet says, "Behold, I lay in Sion for a foundation a precious stone and honourable; and he that resteth thereon shall not be confounded." Unless it be, that God professed Himself to be the builder up of an earthly work, that so He might not give any sign of His Christ, as destined to be the foundation of such as believe in Him, upon which every man should build at will the superstructure of either sound or worthless doctrine; forasmuch as it is the Creator's function, when a man's work shall be tried by fire, (or) when a reward shall be recompensed to him by fire; because it is by fire that the test is applied to the building which you erect upon the foundation which is laid by Him, that is, the foundation of His Christ. "Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? "
AmbrosiasterAD 384
COMMENTARY ON PAUL’S EPISTLES
Paul exposes their error without mentioning the names of the people responsible. The men whom he names here were all good teachers, but by alluding to them in this way he is really getting at the false apostles. For if the Corinthians were not to boast of their devotion to any of these men, how much more would this be true in the case of false teachers, whose corrupt doctrine he refers to next?
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on 1 Corinthians 3
Next he declares also the kind of contention. "That each one of you saith, I am of Paul, and I of Apollos, and I of Cephas." "I say, contentions," saith he, "I mean, not about private matters, but of the more grievous sort, of the Church. And yet they were not speaking about himself, nor about Peter, nor about Apollos; but he signifies that if these were not to be leaned on, much less others. For that they had not spoken about them, he saith further on: "And these things I have transferred in a figure unto myself and Apollos, that ye may learn in us not to go beyond the things which are written." For if it were not right for them to call themselves by the name of Paul, and of Apollos, and of Cephas, much less of any others. If under the Teacher and the first of the Apostles, and one that had instructed so much people, it were not right to enroll themselves, much less under those who were nothing. By way of hyperbole then, seeking to withdraw them from their disease, he sets down these names. Besides, he makes his argument less severe, not mentioning by name the rude dividers of the Church, but concealing them, as behind a sort of masks, with the names of the Apostles.

"I am of Paul, and I of Apollos, and I of Cephas." Not esteeming himself before Peter hath he set his name last, but preferring Peter to himself, and that greatly. He arranged his statement in the way of climax, that he might not be supposed to do this for attack, and then mentions Apollos, and then Cephas. Not therefore to magnify himself did he do this, but in speaking of wrong things he administers the requisite correction in his own person first.

But that those who addicted themselves to this or that man were in error, is evident. And rightly he rebukes them, saying, "Ye do not well in that ye say, 'I am of Paul, and I of Apollos, and I of Cephas.'" But why did he add, "And I of Christ?" For although those who addicted themselves to men were in error, not surely those who dedicated themselves unto Christ. But this was not his charge, that they called themselves by the Name of Christ, but that they did not all call themselves by that Name alone. And I think that he added this of himself, wishing to make the accusation more grievous, and to point out that by this rule Christ must be considered as belonging to one party only: although they were not so using the Name themselves. For that this was what he hinted at he declared in the sequel.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
COMMENTARY ON THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS 168
In reality the Corinthians called themselves after other teachers, but Paul uses his own name and that of Apollos and Peter in order to make his point. By adding the name of Christ to the rest, he showed them how ridiculous the whole conflict was.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Corinthians 1:12 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.