1 Corinthians 1:12
“Plea for Unity and Against Divisions”1 Corinthians 1:10–17
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- λέγωlegōI meanG3004V-PAI-1SVerb Present Active Indicative 1st Singular
- δὲdenowG1161CONJConjunction
- τοῦτοtoutothisG3778D-ASNDemonstrative pronoun Accusative Singular Neuter
- ὅτιhotithatG3754CONJConjunction
- ἕκαστοςhekastoseachG1538A-NSMAdjective Nominative Singular Masculine
- ὑμῶνhumōnof youG4771P-2GPPersonal pronoun Genitive 2nd Plural
- λέγει·legeisaysG3004V-PAI-3SVerb Present Active Indicative 3rd Singular
- ἐγὼegōI myselfG1473P-1NSPersonal pronoun Nominative 1st Singular
- μένmenindeedG3303PRTParticle or Disjunctive
- εἰμιeimiamG1510V-PAI-1SVerb Present Active Indicative 1st Singular
- ΠαύλουPaulouof PaulG3972N-GSM-PNoun Genitive Singular Masculine Individual
- ἐγὼegōI myselfG1473P-1NSPersonal pronoun Nominative 1st Singular
- δὲdehoweverG1161CONJConjunction
- ἈπολλῶApollōof ApollosG625N-GSM-PNoun Genitive Singular Masculine Individual
- ἐγὼegōI myselfG1473P-1NSPersonal pronoun Nominative 1st Singular
- δὲdehoweverG1161CONJConjunction
- ΚηφᾶKēphaof CephasG2786N-GSM-PNoun Genitive Singular Masculine Individual
- ἐγὼegōI myselfG1473P-1NSPersonal pronoun Nominative 1st Singular
- δὲdehoweverG1161CONJConjunction
- ΧριστοῦChristouof ChristG5547N-GSM-TNoun Genitive Singular Masculine Title
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
See on the biblical-era maps


Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers 1 Corinthians 1:10–13.
Here the apostle enters on his subject.
I.He extorts them to unity and brotherly love, and reproves them for their divisions.
He had received an account from some that wished them well of some unhappy differences among them. It was neither ill-will to the church, nor to their ministers, that prompted them to give this account; but a kind and prudent concern to have these heats qualified by Paul's interposition. He writes to them in a very engaging way: "I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ; if you have any regard to that dear and worthy name by which you are called, be unanimous. Speak all the same thing; avoid divisions or schisms" (as the original is), "that is, all alienation of affection from each other. Be perfectly joined together in the same mind, as far as you can. In the great things of religion be of a mind: but, when there is not a unity of sentiment, let there be a union of affections. The consideration of being agreed in greater things should extinguish all feuds and divisions about minor ones."
II.He hints at the origin of these contentions.
Pride lay at the bottom, and this made them factious. Only of pride cometh contention, Proverbs 13:10. They quarrelled about their ministers. Paul and Apollos were both faithful ministers of Jesus Christ, and helpers of their faith and joy: but those who were disposed to be contentious broke into parties, and set their ministers at the head of their several factions: some cried up Paul, perhaps as the most sublime and spiritual teacher; others cried up Apollos, perhaps as the most eloquent speaker; some Cephas, or Peter, perhaps for the authority of his age, or because he was the apostle of the circumcision; and some were for none of them, but Christ only. So liable are the best things in the world to be corrupted, and the gospel and its institutions, which are at perfect harmony with themselves and one another, to be made the engines of variance, discord, and contention. This is no reproach to our religion, but a very melancholy evidence of the corruption and depravity of human nature. Note, How far will pride carry Christians in opposition to one another! Even so far as to set Christ and his own apostles at variance, and make them rivals and competitors.
III.He expostulates with them upon their discord and quarrels:
"Is Christ divided? No, there is but one Christ, and therefore Christians should be on one heart. Was Paul crucified for you? Was he your sacrifice and atonement? Did I ever pretend to be your saviour, or any more than his minister? Or, were you baptized in the name of Paul? Were you devoted to my service, or engaged to be my disciples, by that sacred rite? Did I challenge that right in you, or dependence from you, which is the proper claim of your God and Redeemer?" No; ministers, however instrumental they are of good to us, are not to be put in Christ's stead. They are not to usurp Christ's authority, nor encourage any thing in the people that looks like transferring his authority to them. He is our Saviour and sacrifice, he is our Lord and guide. And happy were it for the churches if there were no name of distinction among them, as Christ is not divided.
Historical interpretation
Four Centuries of Reception
5 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Inspired by God, Paul wrote to you concerning himself and Cephas and Apollos, because even then you were given to faction. But that factiousness involved you in less guilt, because then you were partisans of highly reputed apostles and of those commended by them.
Of this work the Creator also by the same prophet says, "Behold, I lay in Sion for a foundation a precious stone and honourable; and he that resteth thereon shall not be confounded." Unless it be, that God professed Himself to be the builder up of an earthly work, that so He might not give any sign of His Christ, as destined to be the foundation of such as believe in Him, upon which every man should build at will the superstructure of either sound or worthless doctrine; forasmuch as it is the Creator's function, when a man's work shall be tried by fire, (or) when a reward shall be recompensed to him by fire; because it is by fire that the test is applied to the building which you erect upon the foundation which is laid by Him, that is, the foundation of His Christ. "Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? "
Paul exposes their error without mentioning the names of the people responsible. The men whom he names here were all good teachers, but by alluding to them in this way he is really getting at the false apostles. For if the Corinthians were not to boast of their devotion to any of these men, how much more would this be true in the case of false teachers, whose corrupt doctrine he refers to next?
Next he declares also the kind of contention. "That each one of you saith, I am of Paul, and I of Apollos, and I of Cephas." "I say, contentions," saith he, "I mean, not about private matters, but of the more grievous sort, of the Church. And yet they were not speaking about himself, nor about Peter, nor about Apollos; but he signifies that if these were not to be leaned on, much less others. For that they had not spoken about them, he saith further on: "And these things I have transferred in a figure unto myself and Apollos, that ye may learn in us not to go beyond the things which are written." For if it were not right for them to call themselves by the name of Paul, and of Apollos, and of Cephas, much less of any others. If under the Teacher and the first of the Apostles, and one that had instructed so much people, it were not right to enroll themselves, much less under those who were nothing. By way of hyperbole then, seeking to withdraw them from their disease, he sets down these names. Besides, he makes his argument less severe, not mentioning by name the rude dividers of the Church, but concealing them, as behind a sort of masks, with the names of the Apostles.
"I am of Paul, and I of Apollos, and I of Cephas." Not esteeming himself before Peter hath he set his name last, but preferring Peter to himself, and that greatly. He arranged his statement in the way of climax, that he might not be supposed to do this for attack, and then mentions Apollos, and then Cephas. Not therefore to magnify himself did he do this, but in speaking of wrong things he administers the requisite correction in his own person first.
But that those who addicted themselves to this or that man were in error, is evident. And rightly he rebukes them, saying, "Ye do not well in that ye say, 'I am of Paul, and I of Apollos, and I of Cephas.'" But why did he add, "And I of Christ?" For although those who addicted themselves to men were in error, not surely those who dedicated themselves unto Christ. But this was not his charge, that they called themselves by the Name of Christ, but that they did not all call themselves by that Name alone. And I think that he added this of himself, wishing to make the accusation more grievous, and to point out that by this rule Christ must be considered as belonging to one party only: although they were not so using the Name themselves. For that this was what he hinted at he declared in the sequel.
In reality the Corinthians called themselves after other teachers, but Paul uses his own name and that of Apollos and Peter in order to make his point. By adding the name of Christ to the rest, he showed them how ridiculous the whole conflict was.
Continue studying 1 Corinthians 1:12 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
The quarrels have become party slogans, as each member claims a leader, Paul, Apollos or Cephas, and some even make Christ’s name a badge of their own group.
“Now this I say, that every one of you saith,”
Paul spells out what the contentions are. “Saith” (légō) points to slogans spoken aloud, and “every one” (hékastos) to how far they had spread.
“I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas;”
Each name stands for a party gathered round a leader. Paul puts his own name first among those he rebukes.
“and I of Christ.”
The one name that belongs to them all, used here as one more party cry.
Passage study1 Corinthians 1:10–17
A Plea for One Mind in Christ
Summary
Word has reached Paul from the household of Chloe that the church at Corinth is quarrelling. Its members have lined up behind names, saying, “I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.” Paul appeals to them, by the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, to speak the same thing and to be mended into one mind and one judgment. Three short questions then show where every believer’s loyalty belongs: Christ is one, he alone was crucified for them, and they were baptized into his name. Paul thanks God that he baptized only a handful of them, since Christ sent him to preach the gospel, and to preach it plainly, so that the power of the message stays with the cross.
What Paul asks of a divided church
These verses open the body of the letter. After his greeting and his thanksgiving for the grace God has given the Corinthians, Paul turns straight to the problem that troubles him most. The appeal he makes in verse 10 sets the course for much of what follows, from the factions of the first four chapters to his later teaching on worship, spiritual gifts, moral conduct and the resurrection. A church torn into parties would be poorly placed to hear any of it together.
“I beseech you” translates parakaléō, a verb that means to call near, to invite, to exhort or to comfort. Paul has an apostle’s authority, and here he uses it to plead earnestly with the church he founded. He calls them “brethren” (adelphós, a brother), and the family name makes their quarrels all the sadder.
He makes the appeal “by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ”. That name carries Christ’s authority, his character and all he has done to redeem them, and every one of them bears it. So the call to unity rests on Christ himself and on the loyalty all of them owe him, and Paul’s own preference has no part in it.
Paul asks three things. First, that they “all speak the same thing”, which means one confession of the one gospel, so that the church proclaims the same Christ with one voice, free of rival slogans that contradict each other before a watching city. Second, that there be “no divisions” among them. The word is schísma, from schízō, to split or tear. It means a tear, as in cloth, and so a division or schism, and the picture is of the fabric of the church being ripped apart. Third, that they be “perfectly joined together”. The verb katartízō means to complete thoroughly, to repair, to adjust or to restore. It was used for mending fishing nets, setting a broken bone and fitting out a ship for its voyage. Where the factions tear, Christ’s people are to be mended, made whole and fitted again for the work God gave them.
That mending reaches the inner life, “in the same mind and in the same judgment”. The mind, noûs, is the understanding and the inner disposition. Judgment, gnṓmē, is an opinion, a purpose or a resolve. Together they describe believers who see the great truths of the faith alike and set themselves to the same ends. Paul asks the same of the Philippians, that they be of one mind and look to one another’s good (Philippians 2:1–4), and he names the mind he means: the mind of Christ, who humbled himself and became obedient unto death (Philippians 2:5–8).
Does “speak the same thing” mean agreeing on everything?
Paul is asking for one confession and one shared commitment to the core truths of the gospel, so that the church speaks of Christ without partisan rhetoric pulling against its witness. Within that common faith he leaves wide room for different people and different gifts. He later describes the church as one body with many members, each with its own gift (1 Corinthians 12), and he tells the Romans that we, being many, are one body in Christ (Romans 12:4–5). The unity he wants is a harmony the Spirit gives, held together by the truth and by love for one another, and what he forbids is the party spirit that sets one group’s banner against another’s.
Chloe’s household and the report of quarrels
Verse 11 opens with “For” and gives the reason for the appeal. Paul has had news. “It hath been declared” translates dēlóō, to make plain by words, so what reached him was a clear report from people who knew. He calls them “my brethren” again, tenderly, just before he names the trouble.
The report came from “them which are of the house of Chloe”. Chloe was most likely a Christian woman at the head of a household, either in Corinth itself or in Ephesus, where Paul was writing, with close ties to the Corinthian church. The people of her house, who may have been family, servants or freedmen, had travelled and told Paul what they had seen. By naming them, Paul lets the church know that he is acting on firsthand testimony from people it trusts. The verse also gives us a glimpse of how the early churches kept in touch and cared for one another, and of a real concern for a church carried to the apostle who could help, where gossip would only have widened the rift.
What they reported was “contentions”, éris: a quarrel, wrangling, debate, strife or variance. It is a strong word for rivalry and active quarrelling, and Paul lists it among the works of the flesh (Galatians 5:20), set against the life of the Spirit. He tells the Romans to mark those who cause divisions and avoid them (Romans 16:17), and he urges the Ephesians to walk worthy of their calling, “Endeavouring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace” (Ephesians 4:1–3).
Paul deals with this first because so much else depends on it. A church split into parties is poorly placed to live out its calling or to show the world the reconciling power of the gospel, and the moral, practical and doctrinal questions he takes up later all need a church willing to listen to Christ together.
“I am of Paul”: the slogans of Corinth
Paul now says exactly what he means: “every one of you saith”. The verb légō means to lay forth or relate in words, and here it marks a declaration, a slogan said aloud. The word hékastos means each or every, each one of the whole, and it tells us the party spirit ran right through the congregation.
The names are those of real servants of Christ: Paul, who founded the church, Apollos, and Cephas. Cephas is Kēphâs, the Aramaic form of the name Peter, and both mean rock. Including him shows that the factions reached even the most prominent apostles, and that they were built around men, whatever their standing.
The city explains a good deal. Corinth was a wealthy Roman colony and a busy port, with a mixed population and a love of rhetoric, philosophy and social standing. Followers of a philosopher would proudly name their master, and the Corinthians had started to treat Christian teachers in the same way, as heads of rival schools, admired for their eloquence. The church drew together Jews and Gentiles, slaves and free, rich and poor, and each brought habits from the world outside. Paul’s answer runs through the chapters that follow. He sets out God’s wisdom in the cross (1 Corinthians 1:18–31), calls this partisanship the mark of carnal believers, babes in Christ, describes himself and Apollos as ministers by whom the Corinthians believed (1 Corinthians 3:1–7), and insists that the one foundation of the church is Jesus Christ (1 Corinthians 3:11).
What was wrong with saying “I of Christ”?
Belonging to Christ is right for every believer, and the fault lay in making his name one more party badge. In this list the words stand as another slogan. They probably belonged to a group that claimed a closer or purer link to Christ than the others had, and used that claim to set themselves apart and look down on those who followed Paul, Apollos or Cephas. A true confession becomes a cause of division when it is spoken in pride, and Christ’s name belongs to his whole church.
Three questions that answer the factions
Verse 13 puts three questions, each with an answer so plain that the factions fall apart as soon as it is given.
“Is Christ divided?” The verb is merízō, to part or apportion, and figuratively to disunite. Paul uses the perfect passive, memeristai, which speaks of a finished act with a lasting result: has Christ been split up and parcelled out? Christ is one, whole and undivided, so a church that splits into rival parties under his name is acting against who he is. His body, the church, is to show the same oneness. “And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence” (Colossians 1:18). As Paul writes to the Ephesians, “There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling; One Lord, one faith, one baptism, One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all” (Ephesians 4:4–6).
“Was Paul crucified for you?” The verb stauróō means to crucify. Paul names himself, the leader one party had chosen, and the question shows how far below Christ he stands. Christ alone died for them. He is “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29), and God showed his love toward us in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us (Romans 5:8). Salvation is Christ’s work alone, so our loyalty belongs to the one who died for us, and the one who preached to us was his instrument. Paul later reminds the Corinthians that he determined to know nothing among them save Jesus Christ and him crucified (1 Corinthians 2:2).
“Or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?” The verb baptízō means to dip, immerse, wash or baptize, and in the New Testament it is used of Christian baptism. The word for “name”, ónoma, stands for a person’s authority and character. To be baptized in someone’s name was to be identified with that person, to come under his authority and to belong to him. Every believer in Corinth had been baptized into Christ. Paul tells the Romans that “so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death”, to walk in newness of life (Romans 6:3–4), and the Galatians that “as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ”, so that there is neither Jew nor Greek, bond nor free, male nor female, for they are all one in Christ Jesus (Galatians 3:27–28).
These questions also bear on the many churches and movements among believers today. Paul was writing to one local church, and his principle reaches further. Our first loyalty is to Christ. A denomination, tradition or movement may serve good purposes, guarding particular teachings or a heritage, and it serves well while it keeps that loyalty first. Every one who truly confesses Jesus as Lord (Romans 10:9) is a fellow member of his one body.
Why Paul was glad he had baptized so few
“I thank God” is eucharistéō, to be grateful or to give thanks. Paul thanks God, who ordered things so that he personally baptized none of them (oudeís, not even one) except Crispus and Gaius. Crispus was the chief ruler of the synagogue at Corinth, who believed on the Lord with all his house (Acts 18:8). Gaius was a generous believer whom Paul later calls his host and the host of the whole church (Romans 16:23). Paul names them because accuracy matters to him, and the shortness of the list makes his point.
Verse 15 gives the reason. “Lest” is hína mḗ, “in order that not”, a phrase of purpose. Paul held back from baptizing on purpose, so that nobody, in the church or outside it, could say that he baptized in his own name and gathered a following loyal to himself. Here again ónoma means the whole authority and person behind a name. Christian baptism is “in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” (Matthew 28:19), and Acts speaks of believers baptized in the name of Jesus Christ (Acts 2:38) and in the name of the Lord Jesus (Acts 8:16). Each way of saying it places the believer under Christ as Lord and Saviour, so that believers are “in Christ Jesus” (Romans 8:1). Paul’s whole ministry kept this rule: “For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord” (2 Corinthians 4:5).
Verse 16 adds a name he had passed over, “the household of Stephanas”. The word is oîkos, a dwelling and so a family, the whole household of relatives, servants and dependents. In the early church, when the head of a household believed, the household often believed and was baptized with him, as with Lydia (Acts 16:15) and the Philippian jailer (Acts 16:33). Stephanas’s household was the firstfruits of Achaia, among the very first believers in that province, and they gave themselves to serving the saints (1 Corinthians 16:15).
Then Paul adds, “besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.” “Besides” is loipón, “furthermore” or “as for the rest”. “Know” is eídō, which properly means to see and, in the tense used here, to know, and ouk oida, “I know not”, is a plain admission that his memory fails him on the point. The correction shows his honesty, and the uncertainty makes his point for him: the one who performs a baptism matters little beside the Christ into whom we are baptized. Others, perhaps his fellow workers or leaders of the local church, will have baptized the rest of the Corinthians while Paul gave himself to preaching.
Does Paul make light of baptism?
Paul honours baptism as the ordinance Christ commanded, and these verses set it in its true place. Its meaning comes from Christ, into whom we are baptized, and from the gospel it declares, our union with him in his death and resurrection. By one Spirit we are all baptized into one body (1 Corinthians 12:13), and in Corinth the rite that joins believers into one body was being used to sort them into parties. Paul guards it from pride and from loyalty to a minister, so that what baptism truly means stands out clearly.
Sent to preach the gospel, and to preach it plainly
Verse 17 explains all of this: “For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel”. Paul is describing the particular commission Christ gave him. The verb is euangelízō, formed from the words for “well” and “messenger”, and it means to announce good news, in the New Testament especially the good news, the euangelion, about Jesus. Paul was the pioneer, sent to proclaim Christ where he was unknown and so to plant churches, and he often left baptizing to others. The power lies in the message, and the Corinthians who rallied round whoever had baptized them had missed that.
Then he says how he preaches: “not with wisdom of words”. The word sophía covers wisdom of every kind, higher or lower, worldly or spiritual, and here, in “wisdom of words” (sophia logou), it means human wisdom in speech: the polish of rhetoric, the subtlety of philosophy and the arts of persuasion. In Corinth these were highly prized. Public speaking was a competitive art, skilled orators won fame and influence, and people attached themselves to teachers whose speaking pleased them. Paul’s refusal to preach that way would have struck many Corinthians as strange, even scandalous, and it went to the root of their factions.
His reason is “lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect”. The verb kenóō means to make empty, to neutralize, to make void. If people credited the gospel’s power to eloquence, they would empty the cross of its own power, as though Christ’s sacrifice needed human persuasion or polish to do its work. “The cross of Christ” stands for the whole of his saving work, his death and resurrection and all they won for us. There Jesus bore the sins of the world, and there God made him who knew no sin to be sin for us (2 Corinthians 5:21).
This verse opens Paul’s next argument. To those who perish the preaching of the cross is foolishness, and to us who are saved it is the power of God (1 Corinthians 1:18). “But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness” (1 Corinthians 1:23), and to those who are called, Christ is the power of God and the wisdom of God (1 Corinthians 1:24). Paul reminds them that he came to Corinth without excellency of speech, so that their faith would stand in the power of God (1 Corinthians 2:1–5), and the whole of 1 Corinthians 2 sets God’s wisdom against the wisdom of this world. He calls the gospel “the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth” (Romans 1:16), and the cross is the one thing he will glory in (Galatians 6:14). Since the power belongs to God, so does the glory, and nobody may boast in a preacher.
Christ, in whom his church is one
The cure Paul gives for the factions is Christ himself. On the night before he died, Jesus prayed for all who would believe through the apostles’ word, “That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me” (John 17:20–23). The oneness of his people reflects the oneness of the Father and the Son, and it is part of their witness to the world.
At the cross Christ “hath broken down the middle wall of partition” between Jew and Gentile, made of the two one new man, and reconciled both unto God in one body (Ephesians 2:14–16). He is the chief corner stone of the house God is building (Ephesians 2:20), the head over all things to the church, which is his body (Ephesians 1:22–23), the one by whom all things consist (Colossians 1:17), who made peace through the blood of his cross (Colossians 1:20). Paul tells the Corinthians that they are the body of Christ and members in particular, many members sharing one life (1 Corinthians 12:12–27).
So the answer to a quarrel like the one in Corinth is a firmer hold on the crucified and risen Christ, the one source and keeper of his church’s unity. A better leader or a finer philosophy would leave the quarrel where it was.
One Lord at the centre of his church
These verses give the church a single centre. Every believer was bought by the same crucifixion, baptized into the same name and called into the same family, so the ground of our unity was laid by Christ before any of us arrived. The leaders God gives are real gifts, and Paul names Apollos and Cephas with respect, yet they are ministers through whom we believed, and the glory for every work of grace goes to God.
The passage also shows us how Paul cares for a troubled church. He names the fault plainly, he names his source, he still calls the quarrellers “brethren”, and he points them to Christ crucified. He trusts the cross to do its own work by the power of God, without the help of clever speech. Whenever believers are drawn to rally round a name, a style or a camp, these verses bring us back to the questions Paul asked in Corinth, and to the Lord who prayed that his people would be one.
1 Corinthians 1:10
“Now I beseech you, brethren,”
An earnest plea (parakaléō) to his spiritual family, opening the main body of the letter.
“by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ,”
The appeal rests on Christ’s authority and on the name all of them share.
“that ye all speak the same thing,”
One confession of the one gospel, in place of rival slogans.
“and that there be no divisions among you;”
The word is schísma, a tear in the fabric of the church.
“but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment.”
Mended and fitted for use (katartízō), in understanding (noûs) and in purpose (gnṓmē). The repeated “the same” covers both how they think and what they resolve to do.
1 Corinthians 1:11
“For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren,”
“For” gives the reason for verse 10. The report was made plain to him (dēlóō), and he still calls them “my brethren”.
“by them which are of the house of Chloe,”
Members of Chloe’s household, named as Paul’s source, so the church knows the report is firsthand.
“that there are contentions among you.”
Quarrels and rivalry (éris), the trouble the whole appeal answers.
1 Corinthians 1:12 This verse
“Now this I say, that every one of you saith,”
Paul spells out what the contentions are. “Saith” (légō) points to slogans spoken aloud, and “every one” (hékastos) to how far they had spread.
“I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas;”
Each name stands for a party gathered round a leader. Paul puts his own name first among those he rebukes.
“and I of Christ.”
The one name that belongs to them all, used here as one more party cry.
1 Corinthians 1:13
“Is Christ divided?”
Christ is one (merízō, in the perfect passive), and so is his body.
“was Paul crucified for you?”
Only Christ’s death saves, so loyalty belongs to him (stauróō).
“or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?”
Baptism (baptízō) joins us to the one whose name (ónoma) is named over us, and that is Christ.
1 Corinthians 1:14
“I thank God”
Paul gives thanks (eucharistéō) to God for the way things fell out in Corinth.
“that I baptized none of you,”
An emphatic “none” (oudeís), qualified at once.
“but Crispus and Gaius;”
The synagogue ruler who believed with all his house, and the man who later hosted Paul and the whole church.
1 Corinthians 1:15
“Lest any should say”
A clause of purpose (hína mḗ). Paul foresaw the charge and took away any ground for it.
“that I had baptized in mine own name.”
To baptize in his own name would be to gather disciples for himself, under his own authority.
1 Corinthians 1:16
“And I baptized also the household of Stephanas:”
A correction as he remembers. The household (oîkos) included family, servants and dependents, the firstfruits of Achaia.
“besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.”
“Besides” is loipón, and “know” is eídō. Paul admits honestly that he cannot recall, because he kept his eye on the gospel.
1 Corinthians 1:17
“For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel:”
His commission from Christ was to announce the good news (euangelízō).
“not with wisdom of words,”
The sophía of polished speech, so admired in Corinth.
“lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.”
Clever speech would empty (kenóō) the cross of its own power. The verse leads straight into “the preaching of the cross” in verse 18.
Last revised