Skip to content

1 Corinthians 1:11

“Plea for Unity and Against Divisions”1 Corinthians 1:10–17

King James Version
For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions among you.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
For G1063 it hath been declared G1213 unto me G3427 of G4012 you G5216, my G3450 brethren G80, by G5259 them which are of the house G3588 of Chloe G5514, that G3754 there are G1526 contentions G2054 among G1722 you G5213.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
My brothers, some from Chloe’s household have informed me that there are quarrels among you.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
For it hath been signified unto me concerning you, my brethren, by them that are of the household of Chloe, that there are contentions among you.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
For it has been reported to me concerning you, my brothers, by those who are from Chloe’s household, that there are contentions among you.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
For it hath bene declared vnto me, my brethren, of you by them that are of the house of Cloe, that there are contentions among you.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
for it was signified to me concerning you, my brethren, by those of Chloe, that contentions are among you;

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
15 Greek words
  1. ἘδηλώθηEdēlōthēIt was shownG1213V-API-3SVerb Aorist Passive Indicative 3rd Singular
  2. γάρgarforG1063CONJConjunction
  3. μοιmoito meG3165P-1DSPersonal pronoun Dative 1st Singular
  4. περὶpericoncerningG4012PREPPreposition
  5. ὑμῶνhumōnyouG4771P-2GPPersonal pronoun Genitive 2nd Plural
  6. ἀδελφοίadelphoibrothersG80N-VPMNoun Vocative Plural Masculine
  7. μουmouof mineG3165P-1GSPersonal pronoun Genitive 1st Singular
  8. ὑπὸhupobyG5259PREPPreposition
  9. τῶνtōnthoseG3588T-GPMDefinite article Genitive Plural Masculine
  10. ΧλόηςChloēsof ChloeG5514N-GSF-PNoun Genitive Singular Feminine Individual
  11. ὅτιhotithatG3754CONJConjunction
  12. ἔριδεςeridesquarrelsG2054N-NPFNoun Nominative Plural Feminine
  13. ἐνenamongG1722PREPPreposition
  14. ὑμῖνhuminyouG4771P-2DPPersonal pronoun Dative 2nd Plural
  15. εἰσινeisinthere areG1510V-PAI-3PVerb Present Active Indicative 3rd Plural
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
In the KJVVerse 28,375 of 31,102 · 91.2%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

Paul explains why he makes his appeal: people from Chloe’s household have told him plainly that the church is full of quarrels.

“For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren,”

“For” gives the reason for verse 10. The report was made plain to him (dēlóō), and he still calls them “my brethren”.

“by them which are of the house of Chloe,”

Members of Chloe’s household, named as Paul’s source, so the church knows the report is firsthand.

“that there are contentions among you.”

Quarrels and rivalry (éris), the trouble the whole appeal answers.

Passage study1 Corinthians 1:10–17

A Plea for One Mind in Christ

10Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment. 11For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions among you. 12Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ. 13Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul? 14I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius; 15Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name. 16And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other. 17For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.

Summary

Word has reached Paul from the household of Chloe that the church at Corinth is quarrelling. Its members have lined up behind names, saying, “I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.” Paul appeals to them, by the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, to speak the same thing and to be mended into one mind and one judgment. Three short questions then show where every believer’s loyalty belongs: Christ is one, he alone was crucified for them, and they were baptized into his name. Paul thanks God that he baptized only a handful of them, since Christ sent him to preach the gospel, and to preach it plainly, so that the power of the message stays with the cross.

What Paul asks of a divided church

These verses open the body of the letter. After his greeting and his thanksgiving for the grace God has given the Corinthians, Paul turns straight to the problem that troubles him most. The appeal he makes in verse 10 sets the course for much of what follows, from the factions of the first four chapters to his later teaching on worship, spiritual gifts, moral conduct and the resurrection. A church torn into parties would be poorly placed to hear any of it together.

“I beseech you” translates parakaléō, a verb that means to call near, to invite, to exhort or to comfort. Paul has an apostle’s authority, and here he uses it to plead earnestly with the church he founded. He calls them “brethren” (adelphós, a brother), and the family name makes their quarrels all the sadder.

He makes the appeal “by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ”. That name carries Christ’s authority, his character and all he has done to redeem them, and every one of them bears it. So the call to unity rests on Christ himself and on the loyalty all of them owe him, and Paul’s own preference has no part in it.

Paul asks three things. First, that they “all speak the same thing”, which means one confession of the one gospel, so that the church proclaims the same Christ with one voice, free of rival slogans that contradict each other before a watching city. Second, that there be “no divisions” among them. The word is schísma, from schízō, to split or tear. It means a tear, as in cloth, and so a division or schism, and the picture is of the fabric of the church being ripped apart. Third, that they be “perfectly joined together”. The verb katartízō means to complete thoroughly, to repair, to adjust or to restore. It was used for mending fishing nets, setting a broken bone and fitting out a ship for its voyage. Where the factions tear, Christ’s people are to be mended, made whole and fitted again for the work God gave them.

That mending reaches the inner life, “in the same mind and in the same judgment”. The mind, noûs, is the understanding and the inner disposition. Judgment, gnṓmē, is an opinion, a purpose or a resolve. Together they describe believers who see the great truths of the faith alike and set themselves to the same ends. Paul asks the same of the Philippians, that they be of one mind and look to one another’s good (Philippians 2:1–4), and he names the mind he means: the mind of Christ, who humbled himself and became obedient unto death (Philippians 2:5–8).

Does “speak the same thing” mean agreeing on everything?

Paul is asking for one confession and one shared commitment to the core truths of the gospel, so that the church speaks of Christ without partisan rhetoric pulling against its witness. Within that common faith he leaves wide room for different people and different gifts. He later describes the church as one body with many members, each with its own gift (1 Corinthians 12), and he tells the Romans that we, being many, are one body in Christ (Romans 12:4–5). The unity he wants is a harmony the Spirit gives, held together by the truth and by love for one another, and what he forbids is the party spirit that sets one group’s banner against another’s.

Chloe’s household and the report of quarrels

Verse 11 opens with “For” and gives the reason for the appeal. Paul has had news. “It hath been declared” translates dēlóō, to make plain by words, so what reached him was a clear report from people who knew. He calls them “my brethren” again, tenderly, just before he names the trouble.

The report came from “them which are of the house of Chloe”. Chloe was most likely a Christian woman at the head of a household, either in Corinth itself or in Ephesus, where Paul was writing, with close ties to the Corinthian church. The people of her house, who may have been family, servants or freedmen, had travelled and told Paul what they had seen. By naming them, Paul lets the church know that he is acting on firsthand testimony from people it trusts. The verse also gives us a glimpse of how the early churches kept in touch and cared for one another, and of a real concern for a church carried to the apostle who could help, where gossip would only have widened the rift.

What they reported was “contentions”, éris: a quarrel, wrangling, debate, strife or variance. It is a strong word for rivalry and active quarrelling, and Paul lists it among the works of the flesh (Galatians 5:20), set against the life of the Spirit. He tells the Romans to mark those who cause divisions and avoid them (Romans 16:17), and he urges the Ephesians to walk worthy of their calling, “Endeavouring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace” (Ephesians 4:1–3).

Paul deals with this first because so much else depends on it. A church split into parties is poorly placed to live out its calling or to show the world the reconciling power of the gospel, and the moral, practical and doctrinal questions he takes up later all need a church willing to listen to Christ together.

“I am of Paul”: the slogans of Corinth

Paul now says exactly what he means: “every one of you saith”. The verb légō means to lay forth or relate in words, and here it marks a declaration, a slogan said aloud. The word hékastos means each or every, each one of the whole, and it tells us the party spirit ran right through the congregation.

The names are those of real servants of Christ: Paul, who founded the church, Apollos, and Cephas. Cephas is Kēphâs, the Aramaic form of the name Peter, and both mean rock. Including him shows that the factions reached even the most prominent apostles, and that they were built around men, whatever their standing.

The city explains a good deal. Corinth was a wealthy Roman colony and a busy port, with a mixed population and a love of rhetoric, philosophy and social standing. Followers of a philosopher would proudly name their master, and the Corinthians had started to treat Christian teachers in the same way, as heads of rival schools, admired for their eloquence. The church drew together Jews and Gentiles, slaves and free, rich and poor, and each brought habits from the world outside. Paul’s answer runs through the chapters that follow. He sets out God’s wisdom in the cross (1 Corinthians 1:18–31), calls this partisanship the mark of carnal believers, babes in Christ, describes himself and Apollos as ministers by whom the Corinthians believed (1 Corinthians 3:1–7), and insists that the one foundation of the church is Jesus Christ (1 Corinthians 3:11).

What was wrong with saying “I of Christ”?

Belonging to Christ is right for every believer, and the fault lay in making his name one more party badge. In this list the words stand as another slogan. They probably belonged to a group that claimed a closer or purer link to Christ than the others had, and used that claim to set themselves apart and look down on those who followed Paul, Apollos or Cephas. A true confession becomes a cause of division when it is spoken in pride, and Christ’s name belongs to his whole church.

Three questions that answer the factions

Verse 13 puts three questions, each with an answer so plain that the factions fall apart as soon as it is given.

“Is Christ divided?” The verb is merízō, to part or apportion, and figuratively to disunite. Paul uses the perfect passive, memeristai, which speaks of a finished act with a lasting result: has Christ been split up and parcelled out? Christ is one, whole and undivided, so a church that splits into rival parties under his name is acting against who he is. His body, the church, is to show the same oneness. “And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence” (Colossians 1:18). As Paul writes to the Ephesians, “There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling; One Lord, one faith, one baptism, One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all” (Ephesians 4:4–6).

“Was Paul crucified for you?” The verb stauróō means to crucify. Paul names himself, the leader one party had chosen, and the question shows how far below Christ he stands. Christ alone died for them. He is “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29), and God showed his love toward us in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us (Romans 5:8). Salvation is Christ’s work alone, so our loyalty belongs to the one who died for us, and the one who preached to us was his instrument. Paul later reminds the Corinthians that he determined to know nothing among them save Jesus Christ and him crucified (1 Corinthians 2:2).

“Or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?” The verb baptízō means to dip, immerse, wash or baptize, and in the New Testament it is used of Christian baptism. The word for “name”, ónoma, stands for a person’s authority and character. To be baptized in someone’s name was to be identified with that person, to come under his authority and to belong to him. Every believer in Corinth had been baptized into Christ. Paul tells the Romans that “so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death”, to walk in newness of life (Romans 6:3–4), and the Galatians that “as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ”, so that there is neither Jew nor Greek, bond nor free, male nor female, for they are all one in Christ Jesus (Galatians 3:27–28).

These questions also bear on the many churches and movements among believers today. Paul was writing to one local church, and his principle reaches further. Our first loyalty is to Christ. A denomination, tradition or movement may serve good purposes, guarding particular teachings or a heritage, and it serves well while it keeps that loyalty first. Every one who truly confesses Jesus as Lord (Romans 10:9) is a fellow member of his one body.

Why Paul was glad he had baptized so few

“I thank God” is eucharistéō, to be grateful or to give thanks. Paul thanks God, who ordered things so that he personally baptized none of them (oudeís, not even one) except Crispus and Gaius. Crispus was the chief ruler of the synagogue at Corinth, who believed on the Lord with all his house (Acts 18:8). Gaius was a generous believer whom Paul later calls his host and the host of the whole church (Romans 16:23). Paul names them because accuracy matters to him, and the shortness of the list makes his point.

Verse 15 gives the reason. “Lest” is hína mḗ, “in order that not”, a phrase of purpose. Paul held back from baptizing on purpose, so that nobody, in the church or outside it, could say that he baptized in his own name and gathered a following loyal to himself. Here again ónoma means the whole authority and person behind a name. Christian baptism is “in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” (Matthew 28:19), and Acts speaks of believers baptized in the name of Jesus Christ (Acts 2:38) and in the name of the Lord Jesus (Acts 8:16). Each way of saying it places the believer under Christ as Lord and Saviour, so that believers are “in Christ Jesus” (Romans 8:1). Paul’s whole ministry kept this rule: “For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord” (2 Corinthians 4:5).

Verse 16 adds a name he had passed over, “the household of Stephanas”. The word is oîkos, a dwelling and so a family, the whole household of relatives, servants and dependents. In the early church, when the head of a household believed, the household often believed and was baptized with him, as with Lydia (Acts 16:15) and the Philippian jailer (Acts 16:33). Stephanas’s household was the firstfruits of Achaia, among the very first believers in that province, and they gave themselves to serving the saints (1 Corinthians 16:15).

Then Paul adds, “besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.” “Besides” is loipón, “furthermore” or “as for the rest”. “Know” is eídō, which properly means to see and, in the tense used here, to know, and ouk oida, “I know not”, is a plain admission that his memory fails him on the point. The correction shows his honesty, and the uncertainty makes his point for him: the one who performs a baptism matters little beside the Christ into whom we are baptized. Others, perhaps his fellow workers or leaders of the local church, will have baptized the rest of the Corinthians while Paul gave himself to preaching.

Does Paul make light of baptism?

Paul honours baptism as the ordinance Christ commanded, and these verses set it in its true place. Its meaning comes from Christ, into whom we are baptized, and from the gospel it declares, our union with him in his death and resurrection. By one Spirit we are all baptized into one body (1 Corinthians 12:13), and in Corinth the rite that joins believers into one body was being used to sort them into parties. Paul guards it from pride and from loyalty to a minister, so that what baptism truly means stands out clearly.

Sent to preach the gospel, and to preach it plainly

Verse 17 explains all of this: “For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel”. Paul is describing the particular commission Christ gave him. The verb is euangelízō, formed from the words for “well” and “messenger”, and it means to announce good news, in the New Testament especially the good news, the euangelion, about Jesus. Paul was the pioneer, sent to proclaim Christ where he was unknown and so to plant churches, and he often left baptizing to others. The power lies in the message, and the Corinthians who rallied round whoever had baptized them had missed that.

Then he says how he preaches: “not with wisdom of words”. The word sophía covers wisdom of every kind, higher or lower, worldly or spiritual, and here, in “wisdom of words” (sophia logou), it means human wisdom in speech: the polish of rhetoric, the subtlety of philosophy and the arts of persuasion. In Corinth these were highly prized. Public speaking was a competitive art, skilled orators won fame and influence, and people attached themselves to teachers whose speaking pleased them. Paul’s refusal to preach that way would have struck many Corinthians as strange, even scandalous, and it went to the root of their factions.

His reason is “lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect”. The verb kenóō means to make empty, to neutralize, to make void. If people credited the gospel’s power to eloquence, they would empty the cross of its own power, as though Christ’s sacrifice needed human persuasion or polish to do its work. “The cross of Christ” stands for the whole of his saving work, his death and resurrection and all they won for us. There Jesus bore the sins of the world, and there God made him who knew no sin to be sin for us (2 Corinthians 5:21).

This verse opens Paul’s next argument. To those who perish the preaching of the cross is foolishness, and to us who are saved it is the power of God (1 Corinthians 1:18). “But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness” (1 Corinthians 1:23), and to those who are called, Christ is the power of God and the wisdom of God (1 Corinthians 1:24). Paul reminds them that he came to Corinth without excellency of speech, so that their faith would stand in the power of God (1 Corinthians 2:1–5), and the whole of 1 Corinthians 2 sets God’s wisdom against the wisdom of this world. He calls the gospel “the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth” (Romans 1:16), and the cross is the one thing he will glory in (Galatians 6:14). Since the power belongs to God, so does the glory, and nobody may boast in a preacher.

Christ, in whom his church is one

The cure Paul gives for the factions is Christ himself. On the night before he died, Jesus prayed for all who would believe through the apostles’ word, “That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me” (John 17:20–23). The oneness of his people reflects the oneness of the Father and the Son, and it is part of their witness to the world.

At the cross Christ “hath broken down the middle wall of partition” between Jew and Gentile, made of the two one new man, and reconciled both unto God in one body (Ephesians 2:14–16). He is the chief corner stone of the house God is building (Ephesians 2:20), the head over all things to the church, which is his body (Ephesians 1:22–23), the one by whom all things consist (Colossians 1:17), who made peace through the blood of his cross (Colossians 1:20). Paul tells the Corinthians that they are the body of Christ and members in particular, many members sharing one life (1 Corinthians 12:12–27).

So the answer to a quarrel like the one in Corinth is a firmer hold on the crucified and risen Christ, the one source and keeper of his church’s unity. A better leader or a finer philosophy would leave the quarrel where it was.

One Lord at the centre of his church

These verses give the church a single centre. Every believer was bought by the same crucifixion, baptized into the same name and called into the same family, so the ground of our unity was laid by Christ before any of us arrived. The leaders God gives are real gifts, and Paul names Apollos and Cephas with respect, yet they are ministers through whom we believed, and the glory for every work of grace goes to God.

The passage also shows us how Paul cares for a troubled church. He names the fault plainly, he names his source, he still calls the quarrellers “brethren”, and he points them to Christ crucified. He trusts the cross to do its own work by the power of God, without the help of clever speech. Whenever believers are drawn to rally round a name, a style or a camp, these verses bring us back to the questions Paul asked in Corinth, and to the Lord who prayed that his people would be one.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers 1 Corinthians 1:10–13.

1662–1714 · 4 verses
Passage under comment1 Corinthians 1:10–13

Here the apostle enters on his subject.

I.He extorts them to unity and brotherly love, and reproves them for their divisions.

He had received an account from some that wished them well of some unhappy differences among them. It was neither ill-will to the church, nor to their ministers, that prompted them to give this account; but a kind and prudent concern to have these heats qualified by Paul's interposition. He writes to them in a very engaging way: "I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ; if you have any regard to that dear and worthy name by which you are called, be unanimous. Speak all the same thing; avoid divisions or schisms" (as the original is), "that is, all alienation of affection from each other. Be perfectly joined together in the same mind, as far as you can. In the great things of religion be of a mind: but, when there is not a unity of sentiment, let there be a union of affections. The consideration of being agreed in greater things should extinguish all feuds and divisions about minor ones."

II.He hints at the origin of these contentions.

Pride lay at the bottom, and this made them factious. Only of pride cometh contention, Proverbs 13:10. They quarrelled about their ministers. Paul and Apollos were both faithful ministers of Jesus Christ, and helpers of their faith and joy: but those who were disposed to be contentious broke into parties, and set their ministers at the head of their several factions: some cried up Paul, perhaps as the most sublime and spiritual teacher; others cried up Apollos, perhaps as the most eloquent speaker; some Cephas, or Peter, perhaps for the authority of his age, or because he was the apostle of the circumcision; and some were for none of them, but Christ only. So liable are the best things in the world to be corrupted, and the gospel and its institutions, which are at perfect harmony with themselves and one another, to be made the engines of variance, discord, and contention. This is no reproach to our religion, but a very melancholy evidence of the corruption and depravity of human nature. Note, How far will pride carry Christians in opposition to one another! Even so far as to set Christ and his own apostles at variance, and make them rivals and competitors.

III.He expostulates with them upon their discord and quarrels:

"Is Christ divided? No, there is but one Christ, and therefore Christians should be on one heart. Was Paul crucified for you? Was he your sacrifice and atonement? Did I ever pretend to be your saviour, or any more than his minister? Or, were you baptized in the name of Paul? Were you devoted to my service, or engaged to be my disciples, by that sacred rite? Did I challenge that right in you, or dependence from you, which is the proper claim of your God and Redeemer?" No; ministers, however instrumental they are of good to us, are not to be put in Christ's stead. They are not to usurp Christ's authority, nor encourage any thing in the people that looks like transferring his authority to them. He is our Saviour and sacrifice, he is our Lord and guide. And happy were it for the churches if there were no name of distinction among them, as Christ is not divided.

Historical interpretation

Two Centuries of Reception

4 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

4 quotes · AD 220–458
Ante-NicenePost-Nicene
200300400

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

d. AD 220TertullianAnte-NiceneSourceOn Baptism
But they roll back an objection from that apostle himself, in that he said, "For Christ sent me not to baptize; " , as if by this argument baptism were done away! For if so, why did he baptize Gaius, and Crispus, and the house of Stephanas? However, even if Christ had not sent him to baptize, yet He had given other apostles the precept to baptize. But these words were written to the Corinthians in regard of the circumstances of that particular time; seeing that schisms and dissensions were agitated among them, while one attributes everything to Paul, another to Apollos. For which reason the "peace-making" apostle, for fear he should seem to claim all gifts for himself, says that he had been sent "not to baptize, but to preach." For preaching is the prior thing, baptizing the posterior. Therefore the preaching came first: but I think baptizing withal was lawful to him to whom preaching was.
d. AD 384AmbrosiasterPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON PAUL’S EPISTLES
Some people think that “Chloe’s people” are those who remain faithful and bear fruit in the faith of Christ. Others think that Chloe is a place, as if one were to say “Antioch’s people,” for example. But others think that she was a woman devoted to God, in whose company there were many faithful worshipers.
But seeing that whoso is blamed is unabashed so long as he hath no witnesses, observe how, not permitting them to deny the fact, he adduces some to bear witness.

"For it hath been signified unto me concerning you, my brethren, by them which are of the household of Chloe." Neither did he say this at the very beginning, but first he brought forward his charge; as one who put confidence in his informants. Because, had it not been so, he would not have found fault: for Paul was not a person to believe lightly. Neither then did he immediately say, "it hath been signified." Consider also his prudence in not speaking of any distinct person, but of the entire family; so as not to make them hostile towards the informer: for in this way he both protects him, and fearlessly opens the accusation. For he had an eye to the benefit not of the one side only, but of the other also. Wherefore he saith not, "It hath been declared to me by certain," but he indicates also the household, lest they might suppose that he was inventing.

What was "declared?" "That there are contentions among you." Thus, when he speaks, he relies upon the informants.
d. AD 458Theodoret of CyrusPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS 168
Perhaps there was a family at Corinth called Chloe, but Paul does not give any details so as not to reveal their identity and start more quarreling.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying 1 Corinthians 1:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8