मुख्य मजकुरावर जा

Job 4:16

“Eliphaz’s Mystical Revelation”· Job 4:12–21Read in context
King James Version
It stood still, but I could not discern the form thereof: an image was before mine eyes, there was silence, and I heard a voice, saying,
KJV (with Strong's)
It stood still H5975, but I could not discern H5234 the form H4758 thereof: an image H8544 was before mine eyes H5869, there was silence H1827, and I heard H8085 a voice H6963, saying,
Complete Jewish Bible
It stood still, but I couldn't make out its appearance; yet the form stayed there before my eyes. Then I heard a subdued voice:
Berean Standard Bible
It stood still, but I could not discern its appearance; a form loomed before my eyes, and I heard a whispering voice:
American Standard Version
It stood still, but I could not discern the appearance thereof; A form was before mine eyes: There wassilence, and I heard a voice, saying,
World English Bible Messianic
It stood still, but I couldn’t discern its appearance. A form was before my eyes. Silence, then I heard a voice, saying,
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then stoode one, and I knewe not his face: an image was before mine eyes, and in silence heard I a voyce, saying,
Young's Literal Translation
It standeth, and I discern not its aspect, A similitude is over-against mine eyes, Silence! and a voice I hear:
मराठी · MRCV
तो थांबला, परंतु काय आहे ते मात्र मला समजेना. त्याचा आकार माझ्या डोळ्यासमोर होता, आणि त्याचे कुजबुजणे मी ऐकले:
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 12,947 of 31,102 · 41.6%

Study this verse

Summary

Job 4:16 records Eliphaz the Temanite's profound and unsettling account of a supernatural encounter, which he presents as a divine revelation to validate his subsequent counsel to Job. He describes an indistinct, terrifying spiritual presence that stood motionless before him, followed by a profound and oppressive silence, culminating in the clear articulation of an authoritative voice. This enigmatic vision serves as the foundational premise for Eliphaz's argument that Job's immense suffering must inherently stem from hidden sin, reflecting the prevailing retribution theology of his era and establishing a critical, albeit flawed, precedent for the wisdom offered by Job's friends.

Context

Literary Context

Job 4:16 is strategically positioned at the climax of Eliphaz's opening argument, immediately following Job's deeply anguished lament in Job 3. Having listened to Job's profound despair and his questioning of the very purpose of his existence, Eliphaz, the first of Job's three friends to respond, endeavors to provide a theological framework for Job's immense suffering. This verse functions as the dramatic and authoritative prelude to the core of Eliphaz's message, which is delivered by the "voice" beginning in Job 4:17. By attributing his subsequent words to a direct, terrifying divine encounter, Eliphaz seeks to imbue his counsel with irrefutable authority, regrettably grounding it in a flawed understanding of divine justice and Job's blamelessness. The deliberate ambiguity of the vision and the subsequent profound silence are masterfully employed to heighten the dramatic tension, preparing the reader for a revelation that Eliphaz believes is beyond dispute.

Historical & Cultural Context

In the ancient Near East, dreams, visions, and direct auditory experiences were widely recognized and accepted as legitimate avenues for divine communication. Prophets, seers, and even ordinary individuals frequently asserted such encounters as validation for their messages, prophecies, or insights. The culture in which the book of Job is set, often associated with broader wisdom literature traditions, consistently grappled with the complex problem of suffering and the pervasive concept of divine retribution. This theological framework posited that God justly rewards the righteous with prosperity and punishes the wicked with calamity. Eliphaz's vision, therefore, aligns with a cultural expectation regarding how divine truth might be revealed, yet his interpretation of this experience is profoundly influenced by this dominant, and ultimately incomplete, retribution theology. The geographical setting, likely the land of Uz (often associated with Edomite territory), places the narrative within a broader, non-Israelite ancient Near Eastern wisdom tradition, though the book's profound theological insights transcend these specific cultural boundaries.

Key Themes

Job 4:16 introduces and reinforces several crucial themes that resonate throughout the book of Job and beyond. Firstly, it highlights the Mysterious Nature of Divine Encounters, portraying a terrifying and indistinct spiritual manifestation that evokes both profound fear and awe, underscoring humanity's inherent limitation in fully comprehending the divine. Eliphaz's explicit inability to "discern the form thereof" emphasizes the incomprehensibility and transcendence of God's presence. Secondly, the verse establishes the theme of Claim to Divine Revelation, as Eliphaz strategically leverages this personal, mystical experience to legitimize his arguments against Job. He positions his counsel as divinely inspired truth, rather than mere human opinion, thereby setting up a significant tension with Job's eventual direct encounter with God in Job 38. Thirdly, the profound Silence and Anticipation preceding the "voice" masterfully builds intense dramatic tension, underscoring the gravity and perceived authority of the impending message. This dramatic device emphasizes the solemnity and weighty significance of what Eliphaz believes is a direct utterance from the spiritual realm, preparing the audience for a message that profoundly challenges human righteousness before God, a theme further developed in Job 4:17-19.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

marʼeh marʼeh' H5234

Translated as "form" in this verse, this Hebrew word fundamentally refers to a "view" or "appearance," encompassing both the act of seeing and the thing seen, whether a physical shape or a mental vision. In Job 4:16, the critical aspect is Eliphaz's inability to discern this "form" (H5234 nâkar), rendering the apparition indistinct and adding to its terrifying, elusive quality. This contrasts sharply with clearer biblical accounts of divine revelation where a form, however awe-inspiring, is perceived, such as the "similitude of the Lord" seen by Moses in Numbers 12:8.

dᵉmâmâh dᵉmâmâh' H1827

Meaning "quiet," "calm," "silence," or "still," this word powerfully conveys the profound solemnity and absolute quiet that precedes the voice. The "silence" described here is not merely an absence of sound but an active, oppressive stillness that creates an atmosphere of dread and heightened expectation. It signifies a moment of divine preparation, a dramatic pause before a significant utterance, echoing the "still small voice" experienced by Elijah in 1 Kings 19:12.

qôwl qôwl' H6963

Meaning "voice" or "sound," this word denotes the auditory manifestation that dramatically breaks the profound silence. In biblical contexts, a "voice" from the spiritual realm often carries immense authority and significance, signifying a divine pronouncement. The transition from indistinct visual imagery and oppressive silence to a clear, audible "voice" underscores the gravity and perceived divine origin of the message Eliphaz is about to convey, a message he believes to be from God Himself.

Verse Breakdown

"It stood still, but I could not discern the form thereof"

This opening clause introduces the apparition's static nature, emphasizing its tangible presence without movement, yet immediately highlights its elusive quality. The inability to "discern the form" (H5234 nâkar) implies a terrifying ambiguity—something was undeniably present and visually perceived, yet utterly unidentifiable in its precise shape or nature. This lack of clear definition intensifies the mystery and fear surrounding the encounter, preventing Eliphaz from grasping its true essence or origin.

"an image [was] before mine eyes"

This phrase reiterates and confirms the visual aspect of the encounter, affirming that Eliphaz did indeed see something. Despite the preceding statement about his inability to discern a clear "form" (H4758 marʼeh), there was an "image" (H8544 tᵉmûwnâh) or likeness, a shadowy yet distinct presence that registered visually. This underscores the subjective and intensely personal nature of the experience, validating its reality for Eliphaz, even if its specific details remained obscure and terrifying.

"[there was] silence, and I heard a voice, [saying]"

This final part of the verse marks a dramatic and pivotal shift from visual ambiguity to auditory clarity and profound significance. The preceding "silence" (H1827 dᵉmâmâh) is not merely a lack of noise but an active, oppressive hush that builds immense tension and solemnity, creating a sacred space. This deep stillness serves as a powerful backdrop for the subsequent "voice" (H6963 qôwl), making its utterance exceptionally impactful and authoritative. The voice's appearance after such a dramatic pause signals that what is about to be said is of utmost importance, a direct communication from the spiritual realm, setting the stage for Eliphaz's "divine" message.

Literary Devices

Job 4:16 masterfully employs several literary devices to construct a powerful, unsettling, and suspenseful scene. The primary device is Mystery and Ambiguity, profoundly emphasized by Eliphaz's repeated inability to "discern the form" of the apparition, despite acknowledging an "image" before his eyes. This deliberate vagueness heightens the terror and awe, leaving both Eliphaz and the reader to grapple with the unknown and the incomprehensible nature of the encounter. Sensory Imagery is vividly utilized, transitioning from the visual ("image," "form," "eyes") to the auditory ("silence," "voice"), creating a multi-sensory experience that immerses the reader in the scene. The profound "silence" itself functions as a form of Personification, as it is described not merely as an absence but as an active presence that "was" there, creating an atmosphere of dread and anticipation. This "silence" is then dramatically broken by the "voice," creating a powerful Juxtaposition that underscores the gravity and authority of the impending message. Furthermore, the entire account functions as Foreshadowing, building intense anticipation for the "voice's" message in Job 4:17, which will lay the theological groundwork for Eliphaz's subsequent, flawed counsel. There is also a subtle layer of Dramatic Irony, as Eliphaz presents this ambiguous vision as clear divine truth, while the discerning reader, aware of Job's blamelessness and God's later pronouncements, recognizes the eventual misapplication and misinterpretation of this "revelation."

Theological and Thematic Connections

Eliphaz's terrifying, indistinct vision in Job 4:16 raises profound theological questions concerning the nature of divine revelation and the perils of human interpretation. While the encounter is undeniably supernatural and deeply impactful for Eliphaz, its inherent ambiguity ("could not discern the form thereof") and Eliphaz's subsequent misapplication of its message highlight the significant danger of relying solely on subjective experience as the ultimate arbiter of theological truth. Authentic divine revelation, while often awe-inspiring and overwhelming, typically leads to clarity, profound conviction, and a deeper alignment with God's revealed character and purposes. Eliphaz's experience, however, tragically reinforces his preconceived notions about suffering and sin, leading him to unjustly accuse Job. This passage serves as a powerful cautionary tale, reminding us that even genuine spiritual encounters must be rigorously discerned and carefully weighed against the consistent, objective truth of God's written Word. The terror and indistinctness of Eliphaz's vision stand in stark contrast to other biblical accounts where God's presence, though overwhelming, brings specific, understandable messages that lead to repentance, worship, or a clearer understanding of His divine will.

Reflection and Application

Eliphaz's experience in Job 4:16 offers a crucial and enduring lesson for believers today regarding the discernment of spiritual experiences and the responsible formation of theological understanding. While God, in His sovereign wisdom, can and does communicate in myriad ways—including visions, dreams, and inner impressions—this passage powerfully underscores the profound peril of allowing subjective encounters, no matter how profound or terrifying, to become the sole or primary basis for our theology, particularly when such experiences lead to conclusions that contradict the clear, consistent character of God revealed in Scripture. Eliphaz's vision, though undeniably supernatural, tragically led him to a flawed and hurtful judgment of Job, vividly demonstrating how personal experiences can be misinterpreted through the distorting lens of our own biases, incomplete understanding, or existing theological frameworks. For us, this calls for cultivating a deep humility before God's mystery, acknowledging that His ways are often far beyond our full comprehension, and diligently testing all "revelations" against the unchanging, objective standard of His written Word. It compels us to "test the spirits to see whether they are from God" (1 John 4:1), ensuring that our spiritual insights align perfectly with the objective truth of God's nature, His redemptive plan, and His revealed will for humanity.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How do we, in our own lives, responsibly discern genuine spiritual experiences from mere subjective impressions, emotional responses, or even potential deception?
  2. Considering the objective and complete truth of Scripture, what appropriate role should personal revelation or mystical experiences play in shaping our theological understanding?
  3. In what specific ways might we, like Eliphaz, be tempted to interpret our experiences or the suffering of others through our own preconceived notions about God's justice or the nature of human sin?

FAQ

Was Eliphaz's vision a true revelation from God?

The text describes a genuine supernatural experience for Eliphaz, implying it was indeed a spiritual encounter he personally experienced. However, the critical point is not the reality of the vision itself, but Eliphaz's interpretation and application of it. The vision was terrifying and indistinct ("could not discern the form thereof"), and the subsequent message, while posing a rhetorical question about human righteousness before God (Job 4:17), was ultimately used by Eliphaz to condemn Job unjustly. Ultimately, God Himself rebukes Eliphaz and his friends for not speaking what was right about Him (Job 42:7). This suggests that while the encounter might have been divinely permitted or even initiated, Eliphaz's human wisdom and flawed retribution theology led him to misinterpret its meaning and misapply its implications, tragically transforming a potentially humbling experience into a tool for accusation.

Why did God allow such a terrifying and indistinct vision?

The text does not explicitly state God's precise purpose for Eliphaz's specific vision. However, several possibilities align with broader biblical themes concerning divine encounters. Firstly, it could serve to humble Eliphaz, demonstrating the overwhelming and incomprehensible nature of God's presence, which is often beyond the full grasp of finite human beings. The terror and ambiguity might be inherent to encountering the divine for those not fully prepared or chosen for a clearer revelation. Secondly, it highlights the inherent limits of human wisdom and understanding, even when confronted with the supernatural. Eliphaz, despite his profound experience, still arrives at a flawed and uncharitable conclusion about Job's suffering. Thirdly, it sets the stage for the dramatic unfolding of the book of Job, where human attempts to explain God's ways ultimately fall short, paving the way for God's own majestic and unchallengeable revelation from the whirlwind in Job 38. The indistinctness may also serve as a powerful literary device to underscore the general human struggle to fully comprehend the transcendent and mysterious nature of the divine.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Eliphaz's terrifying, indistinct vision and the subsequent ambiguous voice in Job 4:16 stand in profound and illuminating contrast to the ultimate, perfect, and clear revelation of God found in Jesus Christ. Where Eliphaz struggled to "discern the form" of the spiritual presence, and the message he received, while supernatural, led him to a flawed and hurtful theology, in Christ we encounter the full, perfect, and clear manifestation of God's very being. Jesus is explicitly described as the "image of the invisible God" (Colossians 1:15), and the exact "imprint of His nature" (Hebrews 1:3). Where Eliphaz saw an indistinct "image," we behold God perfectly revealed in human flesh, making the incomprehensible God comprehensible. The profound "silence" preceding Eliphaz's voice finds its ultimate fulfillment in the Incarnate Word of God, who "became flesh and dwelt among us" (John 1:14), and through whom God has now "spoken to us by His Son" (Hebrews 1:1-2). Unlike the terrifying and accusatory message Eliphaz derived from his experience, Christ's voice speaks of grace, truth, and eternal salvation, inviting us not to fear but to draw near with confidence to the throne of grace (Hebrews 4:16). In Jesus, the mystery of God is not an indistinct terror but a loving, redemptive reality made fully known and accessible to all who believe.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Job 4:12–21. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 10 verses
Passage under commentJob 4:12–21
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Eliphaz, having undertaken to convince Job of the sin and folly of his discontent and impatience, here vouches a vision he had been favoured with, which he relates to Job for his conviction. What comes immediately from God all men will pay a particular deference to, and Job, no doubt, as much as any. Some think Eliphaz had this vision now lately, since he came to Job, putting words into his mouth wherewith to reason with him; and it would have been well if he had kept to the purport of this vision, which would serve for a ground on which to reprove Job for his murmuring, but not to condemn him as a hypocrite. Others think he had it formerly; for God did, in this way, often communicate his mind to the children of men in those first ages of the world, Job 33:15. Probably God had sent Eliphaz this messenger and message some time or other, when he was himself in an unquiet discontented frame, to calm and pacify him. Note, As we should comfort others with that wherewith we have been comforted (Co2 1:4), so we should endeavour to convince others with that which has been powerful to convince us. The people of God had not then any written word to quote, and therefore God sometimes notified to them even common truths by the extraordinary ways of revelation. We that have Bibles have there (thanks be to God) a more sure word to depend upon than even visions and voices, Pe2 1:19. Observe,

I.The manner in which this message was sent to Eliphaz, and the circumstances of the conveyance of it to him.

1.It was brought to him secretly, or by stealth. Some of the sweetest communion gracious souls have with God is in secret, where no eye sees but that of him who is all eye. God has ways of bringing conviction, counsel, and comfort, to his people, unobserved by the world, by private whispers, as powerfully and effectually as by the public ministry. His secret is with them, Psa 25:14. As the evil spirit often steals good words out of the heart (Mat 13:19), so the good Spirit sometimes steals good words into the heart, or ever we are aware.

2.He received a little thereof, Job 4:12. And it is but a little of divine knowledge that the best receive in this world. We know little in comparison with what is to be known, and with what we shall know when we come to heaven. How little a portion is heard of God! Job 26:14. We know but in part, Co1 13:12. See his humility and modesty. He pretends not to have understood it fully, but something of it he perceived.

3.It was brought to him in the visions of the night (Job 4:13), when he had retired from the world and the hurry of it, and all about him was composed and quiet. Note, The more we are withdrawn from the world and the things of it the fitter we are for communion with God. When we are communing with our own hearts, and are still (Psa 4:4), then is a proper time for the Holy Spirit to commune with us. When others were asleep Eliphaz was ready to receive this visit from Heaven, and probably, like David, was meditating upon God in the night-watches; in the midst of those good thoughts this thing was brought to him. We should hear more from God if we thought more of him; yet some are surprised with convictions in the night, Job 33:14, Job 33:15.

4.It was prefaced with terrors: Fear came upon him, and trembling, Job 4:14. It should seem, before he either heard or saw any thing, he was seized with this trembling, which shook his bones, and perhaps the bed under him. A holy awe and reverence of God and his majesty being struck upon his spirit, he was thereby prepared for a divine visit. Whom God intends to honour he first humbles and lays low, and will have us all to serve him with holy fear, and to rejoice with trembling.

II.The messenger by whom it was sent - a spirit, one of the good angels, who are employed not only as the ministers of God's providence, but sometimes as the ministers of his word. Concerning this apparition which Eliphaz saw we are here told (Job 4:15, Job 4:16),

1.That it was real, and not a dream, not a fancy. An image was before his eyes; he plainly saw it; at first it passed and repassed before his face, moved up and down, but at length it stood still to speak to him. If some have been so knavish as to impose false visions on others, and some so foolish as to be themselves imposed upon, it does not therefore follow but that there may have been apparitions of spirits, both good and bad.

2.That it was indistinct, and somewhat confused. He could not discern the form thereof, so as to frame any exact idea of it in his own mind, much less to give a description of it. His conscience was to be awakened and informed, not his curiosity gratified. We know little of spirits; we are not capable of knowing much of them, nor is it fit that we should: all in good time; we must shortly remove to the world of spirits, and shall then be better acquainted with them.

3.That it puts him into a great consternation, so that his hair stood on end. Ever since man sinned it has been terrible to him to receive an express from heaven, as conscious to himself that he can expect no good tidings thence; apparitions therefore, even of good spirits, have always made deep impressions of fear, even upon good men. How well it is for us that God sends us his messages, not by spirits, but by men like ourselves, whose terror shall not make us afraid! See Dan 7:28; Dan 10:8, Dan 10:9.

III.The message itself.

Before it was delivered there was silence, profound silence, Job 4:16. When we are to speak either from God or to him it becomes us to address ourselves to it with a solemn pause, and so to set bounds about the mount on which God is to come down, and not be hasty to utter any thing. It was in a still small voice that the message was delivered, and this was it (Job 4:17): "Shall mortal man be more just than God, the immortal God? Shall a man be thought to be, or pretend to be, more pure than his Maker? Away with such a thought!" 1. Some think that Eliphaz aims hereby to prove that Job's great afflictions were a certain evidence of his being a wicked man. A mortal man would be thought unjust and very impure if he should thus correct and punish a servant or subject, unless he had been guilty of some very great crime: "If therefore there were not some great crimes for which God thus punishes thee, man would be more just than God, which is not to be imagined." 2. I rather think it is only a reproof of Job's murmuring and discontent: "Shall a man pretend to be more just and pure than God? more truly to understand, and more strictly to observe, the rules and laws of equity than God? Shall Enosh, mortal and miserable man, be so insolent; nay, shall Geber, the strongest and most eminent man, man at his best estate, pretend to compare with God, or stand in competition with him?" Note, It is most impious and absurd to think either others or ourselves more just and pure than God. Those that quarrel and find fault with the directions of the divine law, the dispensations of the divine grace, or the disposals of the divine providence, make themselves more just and pure than God; and those who thus reprove God, let them answer it. What! sinful man! (for he would not have been mortal if he had not been sinful) short-sighted man! Shall he pretend to be more just, more pure, than God, who, being his Maker, is his Lord and owner? Shall the clay contend with the potter? What justice and purity there is in man, God is the author of it, and therefore is himself more just and pure. See Psa 94:9, Psa 94:10.

IV.The comment which Eliphaz makes upon this, for so it seems to be; yet some take all the following verses to be spoken in vision. It comes all to one.

1.He shows how little the angels themselves are in comparison with God, Job 4:18. Angels are God's servants, waiting servants, working servants; they are his ministers (Psa 104:4); bright and blessed beings they are, but God neither needs them nor is benefited by them and is himself infinitely above them, and therefore, (1.) He puts no trust in them, did not repose a confidence in them, as we do in those we cannot live without. There is no service in which he employs them but, if he pleased, he could have it done as well without them. he never made them his confidants, or of his cabinet-council, Mat 24:36. He does not leave his business wholly to them, but his own eyes run to and fro through the earth, Ch2 16:9. See this phrase, Job 39:11. Some give this sense of it: "So mutable is even the angelical nature that God would not trust angels with their own integrity; if he had, they would all have done as some did, left their first estate; but he saw it necessary to give them supernatural grace to confirm them." (2.) He charges them with folly, vanity, weakness, infirmity, and imperfection, in comparison with himself. If the world were left to the government of the angels, and they were trusted with the sole management of affairs, they would take false steps, and everything would not be done for the best, as now it is. Angels are intelligences, but finite ones. Though not chargeable with iniquity, yet with imprudence. This last clause is variously rendered by the critics. I think it would bear this reading, repeating the negation, which is very common: He will put no trust in his saints; nor will he glory in his angels (in angelis suis non ponet gloriationem) or make his boast of them, as if their praises, or services, added any thing to him: it is his glory that he is infinitely happy without them.

2.Thence he infers how much less man is, how much less to be trusted in or gloried in. If there is such a distance between God and angels, what is there between God and man! See how man is represented here in his meanness.

(1.)Look upon man in his life, and he is very mean, Job 4:19. Take man in his best estate, and he is a very despicable creature in comparison with the holy angels, though honourable if compared with the brutes. It is true, angels are spirits, and the souls of men are spirits; but,

[1.]Angels are pure spirits; the souls of men dwell in houses of clay: such the bodies of men are. Angels are free; human souls are housed, and the body is a cloud, a clog, to it; it is its cage; it is its prison. It is a house of clay, mean and mouldering; an earthen vessel, soon broken, as it was first formed, according to the good pleasure of the potter. It is a cottage, not a house of cedar or a house of ivory, but of clay, which would soon be in ruins if not kept in constant repair.

[2.]Angels are fixed, but the very foundation of that house of clay in which man dwells is in the dust. A house of clay, if built upon a rock, might stand long; but, if founded in the dust, the uncertainty of the foundation will hasten its fall, and it will sink with its own weight. As man was made out of the earth, so he is maintained and supported by that which cometh out of the earth. Take away that, and his body returns to its earth. We stand but upon the dust; some have a higher heap of dust to stand upon than others, but still it is the earth that stays us up and will shortly swallow us up.

[3.]Angels are immortal, but man is soon crushed; the earthly house of his tabernacle is dissolved; he dies and wastes away, is crushed like a moth between one's fingers, as easily, as quickly; one may almost as soon kill a man as kill a moth. A little thing will destroy his life. He is crushed before the face of the moth, so the word is. If some lingering distemper, which consumes like a moth, be commissioned to destroy him, he can no more resist it than he can resist an acute distemper, which comes roaring upon him like a lion. See Hos 5:12-14. Is such a creature as this to be trusted in, or can any service be expected from him by that God who puts no trust in angels themselves?

(2.)Look upon him in his death, and he appears yet more despicable, and unfit to be trusted. Men are mortal and dying, Job 4:20, Job 4:21.

[1.]In death they are destroyed, and perish for ever, as to this world; it is the final period of their lives, and all the employments and enjoyments here; their place will know them no more.

[2.]They are dying daily, and continually wasting: Destroyed from morning to evening. Death is still working in us, like a mole digging our grave at each remove, and we so continually lie exposed that we are killed all the day long.

[3.]Their life is short, and in a little time they are cut off. It lasts perhaps but from morning to evening. It is but a day (so some understand it); their birth and death are but the sun-rise and sun-set of the same day.

[4.]In death all their excellency passes away; beauty, strength, learning, not only cannot secure them from death, but must die with them, nor shall their pomp, their wealth, or power, descend after them.

[5.]Their wisdom cannot save them from death: They die without wisdom, die for want of wisdom, by their own foolish management of themselves, digging their graves with their own teeth.

[6.]It is so common a thing that nobody heeds it, nor takes any notice of it: They perish without any regarding it, or laying it to heart. The deaths of others are much the subject of common talk, but little the subject of serious thought. Some think the eternal damnation of sinners is here spoken of, as well as their temporal death: They are destroyed, or broken to pieces, by death, from morning to evening; and, if they repent not, they perish for ever (so some read it), Job 4:20. They perish for ever because they regard not God and their duty; they consider not their latter end, Lam 1:9. They have no excellency but that which death takes away, and they die, they die the second death, for want of wisdom to lay hold on eternal life. Shall such a mean, weak, foolish, sinful, dying creature as this pretend to be more just than God and more pure than his Maker? No, instead of quarrelling with his afflictions, let him wonder that he is out of hell.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Two Centuries of Reception

2 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

2 quotes · AD 604–850
Post-NiceneEarly Medieval
600700800

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

AD 604Gregory the DialogistEarly Medieval
61. For we do not speak of a certain one, saving surely in the case of him, whom we are either unwilling or unable to express. Now with what feeling it is here said a certain one, is clearly set forth, in that it immediately comes in, but I could not discern the form thereof. For the human soul, being by the sin of the first of mankind banished from the joys of paradise, lost the light of the invisible, and poured itself out entire in the love of the visible, and was darkened in the interior sight, in proportion as it was dissipated without, to the deformment of itself. Whence it comes to pass that it knows nothing, saving the things that it acquaints itself with by the palpable touch, so to say, of the bodily eyes. For man, who, had he been willing to have kept the commandment, would even in his flesh have been a spiritual being, by sinning was rendered even in soul carnal, so as to imagine such things only as he derives to the soul through the images of bodily substances. For body is the property of heaven, earth, water, animals, and all the visible things; which he unceasingly beholds; and while the delighted mind wholly precipitates itself into these, it waxes gross, loses the fineness of the inward sense; and whereas it is now no longer able to erect itself to things on high, it willingly lies prostrate in its weakness in things below. But when with marvellous efforts it strives to rise up from the same, it is great indeed, if the soul, thrusting aside the bodily form, be brought to the knowledge of itself, so as to think of itself without a bodily figure, and by thus thinking of itself to prepare itself a pathway to contemplate the substance of Eternity.
62. Now in this way it shows itself to its own eyes as a kind of ladder, whereby in ascending from outward things to pass into itself, and from itself to tend unto its Maker. For when the mind quits bodily images, entering into itself, it mounts up to no mean height; for though the soul be incorporeal, yet because she is incorporate with the body, she is known by that property of hers, which is confined within the local bounds of the flesh. And whereas she forgets things known, acquaints herself with such as are unknown, remembers what has been consigned to oblivion, entertains mirth after sadness, is adjudged to punishment [addicitur] after joy; she herself shows by her own diversity in herself, how widely she is removed from the Substance of eternal Unchangeableness. Which is always the same, even as It Is; Which every where present, every where invisible, every where whole and entire, every where incomprehensible, is by the longing mind discerned without seeing, heard without uncertainty, taken in without motion, touched without bodily substance, held without locality. Now when the mind that is used to corporeal objects represents to itself this same Substance, it is loaded with the phantasms of divers images. And whilst it banishes these from the eyes of its attention with the hand of discernment, making every thing give place thereto, it at last beholds It in some degree. And if it does not as yet apprehend what It is, it has surely learnt what It is not. And so because the mind is carried away into unaccustomed ground, when it pries into the Essence of the Deity, it is rightly said here, A certain one stood, but I could not discern the form thereof.
63. And it is well said, it stood still; for every created thing, in that it is made out of nothing, and of itself tends to nothing, has not the property to stand, but to run to an end. But a creature endowed with reason, by this very circumstance, that it is created after the image of its Maker, is fixed
that it should not pass into nothing. Now no irrational creature is ever fixed, but only, so long as, by the service of its appearing, it is completing the form and fashion of the universe, it is delayed in passing away. For though heaven and earth abide henceforth and for ever, still they are at this present time of themselves hastening on to nought; yet for the use of those, whom they serve, they remain to be changed for the better. To ‘stand’ then is the attribute of the Creator alone, through Whom all thing's pass away, Himself never passing away, and in Whom some things are held fast, that they should not pass away. Hence our Redeemer, because the fixed state of His Divine Nature could not be comprehended by the human mind, showed this to us as it were in passing, by coming to us, by being created, born, dead, buried, by rising again, and returning to the heavenly realms. Which He well shadowed out in the Gospel by the enlightening the blind man, to whom when passing on He vouchsafed a hearing, but it was standing still that He healed his eyes. For by the economy of His Human Nature He had His passing on, but the standing by the power of His Divine Nature, in that He is every where present. Thus the Lord is said to hear the complaints of our blind condition in passing, in that being made Man He has compassion on human misery; but He restores light to the eyes standing still, in that He enlightens the darkness of our frail state by the efficacy of His Divine Nature. It is well then that, after it has been said, Then a spirit passed before my face, it should be added, but I could not discern the form thereof. As if it were in plain words, ‘Him, Whom I perceived in passing, I discovered never to pass.’ He then that ‘passes’ is the same as He that ‘stands still.’ He ‘passes,’ in that when known He cannot be detained, He ‘stands still,’ in that, so far as He is known, He is seen to be unchangeable. Therefore, because He, That is ever the Same, is seen by a hasty glance, God at the same time appears both passing and standing still. Or surely His ‘standing’ is His never varying with any change; as it is said to Moses, I AM THAT I AM. And as James represents Him, saying, With Whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning. [Jam. 1, 17] Now whereas every man, that apprehends something of the Eternal Being by contemplation, beholds the Same through His coeternal Image, it is rightly subjoined;
An image was before mine eyes.
64. For the Image of the Father is the Son, as Moses teaches in the case of man at his creation; So God created man in His own Image; in the Image of God created He him. [Gen. 1, 27] And as the Wise Man, in the setting forth of Wisdom, saith concerning the same Son, For She is the brightness of the everlasting light. [Wisd. 7, 26] And as Paul hath it, Who being the brightness of His glory, and the express Image of His Person. [Heb. 1, 3] When then His Eternity is perceived as far as the capability of our frail nature admits, His Image is set before the eyes of the mind, in that when we really strain towards the Father, as far as we receive Him we see Him by His Image, i.e. by His Son, And by That Image, Which was born of Himself without beginning, we strive in some sort to obtain a glimpse of Him, Who hath neither beginning nor ending. And hence this same Truth saith in the Gospel, No man cometh to the Father but by Me. [John 14, 6] And it is well added,
And I heard the voice as it were of a light breath.
65. For what is signified by ‘the voice of a light breath,’ but the knowledge of the Holy Spirit, Which proceeding from the Father, and receiving of that which belongeth to the Son, is gently imparted to the knowledge of our frail nature? Yet when It came upon the Apostles, It is demonstrated by an outward sound, like a vehement blast, where it is said, And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind. [Acts 2, 2] For when the Holy Spirit imparts Itself to the knowledge of frail humanity, It is both represented by ‘the sound of a rushing mighty wind,’ and also by the ‘voice of a gentle breath,’ clearly, in that when It comes, It is both ‘vehement’ and ‘gentle;’ ‘gentle,’ in that It tempers the knowledge of Itself to our perceptions, so as to be in some sort brought under our cognizance; ‘vehement,’ in that however It may temper that same, yet by Its coming, It confounds while It illumines the darkness of our frail condition. For It touches us but lightly by Its enlightening influence, yet it shakes our emptiness with fearful might.
66. So God's voice is heard as if of ‘a light breath,’ in that the Divine Being never imparts Himself as He is to those that contemplate Him while still in this life, but to the purblind eyes of our mind He discovers His brightness but scantily. Which is well represented by the very receiving of the Law itself, when it is said that Moses ascended, and God descended upon the Mount. For ‘the Mount’ is our very contemplation itself, whereinto we ascend, that we may be elevated to see those things which are beyond our frail nature; but the Lord descends thereupon, in that, when we advance much, He discloses some little concerning Himself to our perceptions, if either ‘little’ or ‘somewhat’ can be said to be in Him, Who, being always One and abiding the Same, cannot be understood by parts, and yet is said to be participated by His faithful servants, whereas ‘part’ is nowise admissible in His Substance. But because we are unable to express Him with perfect speech, being hindered by the scanty measure of our human nature, as by the impotency of the infant state, we give back an echo of Him in some sort with stammering utterance. But that when we are lifted up in high contemplation, it is somewhat refined that we attain unto in the knowledge of the Eternal One, is shown by the words of Sacred Story, when the illustrious Prophet Elijah is instructed in the knowledge of God. For when the Lord promised him that He would pass by before him, saying, And, behold, the Lord passeth by, a great and strong wind rending the mountains, and breaking in pieces the rocks before the Lord; He thereupon added, But the Lord is not in the wind: and after the wind a quaking, but the Lord is not in the quaking: and after the quaking a fire, but the Lord is not in the fire: and after the fire, a still small voice. [1 Kings 19, 11. 12.] [V. the whisper of a gentle air] For the wind before the Lord overturns the mountains, and shatters the rocks, in that the affright, which rushes in upon us from His coming, both casts down the exaltation of our hearts, and melts their hardness. But the Lord is said not to be in the ‘wind of quaking’ and in the fire, but it is not denied that He is ‘in the still small voice,’ in that verily when the mind is hung aloft in the height of contemplation, whatever it has power to see perfectly and completely is not God, but when it sees something of great fineness, this is the same as that he hears belonging to the incomprehensible substance of the Deity. For we as it were perceive a still small voice, when by a moment's contemplation we taste with finest sense the savour of incomprehensible truth. Accordingly then only is there truth in what we know concerning God, when we are made sensible that we cannot know any thing fully concerning Him. Hence it is well added in that place, And it was so when Elijah heard it, that he wrapped his face in his mantle, and went out and stood at the entering in of the cave. After the still small voice, the Prophet covers his face with his mantle, because in that very refined contemplation he learns in what a cloak of ignorance man is shrouded; for to draw the mantle over the face is to veil the mind by the consideration of its own infirmity, that it may never presume to seek things above it, that it never rashly open the eyes of the understanding beyond itself, but close them with a feeling of awe to that which it cannot apprehend. And he, in doing such things, is described to have stood at the entering in of the cave. For what is our cave but this dwelling-place of our corrupt nature, wherein we are still held fast from remaining oldness? But when we begin to take in something of the knowledge of the Divine Being, we as it were already stand ‘in the entering in of our cave;’ for whereas we cannot make perfect progress, yet panting after the knowledge of the truth, we already catch something of the breath of liberty. So to ‘stand at the entering in of the cave,’ is, forcing aside the obstruction of our corrupt nature, to begin to issue forth to the knowledge of the truth. And hence upon the cloud descending on the Tabernacle, the Israelites seeing it afar off are related to have stood at the entering in of their tents, [Ex. 33, 9] in that they, who in some sort behold the coming of the Deity, as it were already issue forth from the habitation of the flesh. Therefore because with whatever amplitude of virtue the human mind may have enlarged its compass, yet it scarcely knows the very outermost extremes that belong to the interior things, it is rightly said here, And I heard the voice as of a light breath; but as at the time that the knowledge of the Deity shows us after all but little concerning Itself, It is perfectly instructing the ignorance of our infirmness; let him that ‘heard the voice of a light breath,’ declare all that he learnt by that same hearing.
AD 850Ishodad of MervEarly MedievalSourceCOMMENTARY ON JOB 4:16
Eliphaz employs “murmur” and “voice” as words to express his ideas about God. As … the murmur and the voice strike our ears, they have no form or aspect. We only receive their sensation. Just as it is not possible to see a “murmur” or “voice,” so we must realize the same is true of our thoughts about the divine nature. We receive our perception and knowledge of the divine nature as God gives us these thoughts, but this is not something that we can perceive through forms.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Job 4:16 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8